Front. Chem. Eng. Frontiers in Chemical Engineering Front. Chem. Eng. 2673-2718 Frontiers Media S.A. 744911 10.3389/fceng.2021.744911 Chemical Engineering Perspective Photo-Driven Reduction of Carbon Dioxide: A Sustainable Approach Towards Achieving Carbon Neutrality Goal Gui et al. Photo-Driven Reduction of Carbon Dioxide Gui Meei Mei 1 Lee W.P. Cathie 2 Putri Lutfi Kurnianditia 3 Kong Xin Ying 4 Tan Lling-Lling 5 Chai Siang-Piao 5 * School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom Entropic Interface Group, Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore Low Carbon Economy (LCE) Research Group, School of Chemical Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal, Malaysia Division of Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore Multidisciplinary Platform of Advanced Engineering, Chemical Engineering Discipline, School of Engineering, Monash University, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia

Edited by: Mingming Lu, University of Cincinnati, United States

Reviewed by: Rahul Kumar, Arizona State University, United States

Shixuan Zeng, Bettergy, United States

 *Correspondence: Siang-Piao Chai, chai.siang.piao@monash.edu

This article was submitted to Sustainable Process Engineering, a section of the journal Frontiers in Chemical Engineering

 11 11 2021 2021 3 744911 21 07 2021 25 10 2021 Copyright © 2021 Gui, Lee, Putri, Kong, Tan and Chai. 2021 Gui, Lee, Putri, Kong, Tan and Chai

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

The photo-driven reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) into green and valuable solar fuels could be a promising solution to simultaneously address energy- and environmental-related problems. This approach could play an integral role in achieving a sustainable energy economy by closing the carbon cycle and allowing the storage and transportation of intermittent solar energy within the chemical bonds of hydrocarbon molecules. This Perspective discusses the latest technological advancements in photo-driven CO2 conversion via various pathways, namely photocatalysis, photoelectrocatalysis and photovoltaic-integrated systems. In addition to providing an outlook on unresolved issues concerning the said technologies, this Perspective also spotlights new trends and strategies in the structural engineering of materials to meet the demands for prominent CO2 photoreduction activity as well as spearhead the ground-breaking advances in the field that lead to the translation of CO2 photo-driven technologies from the laboratory to industrial-scale applications.

 carbon dioxide photocatalysis photoelectrochemical photovoltaic environmental remediation Introduction

Greenhouse gases (GHG) emission has been identified as the major cause that leads to climate change and has remained as the primary challenge in the effort to control the pace of global warming. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) entered into force in 1994 with a pivotal role to oversee and control the emission of GHG as a global effort. In the same year, the impact of climate change and the need for mitigations to tackle this issue were recognized and highlighted for the first time in the Convention. Figure 1A depicts key development of climate change actions by UNFCCC since its establishment. The Kyoto Protocol was initiated in 1997 with all party members came into agreement to limit and reduce the emission of GHG with individual targets tailored for their respective countries. The initiative only entered into force 8 years later and was amended in 2012 (known as the Doha Amendment) with emission targets renewed for the second commitment period from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2020 (United Nations Climate Change). On the other hand, Copenhagen Accord was established in December 2009 where a target of global temperature rises of not more than 2 C above pre-industrial level was introduced (United Nations Climate Change, 2009). The global target was highlighted again in Paris Agreement, 2015, to drive social and economic transformation to control global warming at preferably 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels (United Nations Climate Change). In response to the Paris Agreement, both EU and United Kingdom have set their targets to achieve at least 55 and 68% reduction in GHG emission, respectively by 2030 with the final goal of zero-carbon emission by 2050 (Gov, 2020; European Commission). This ambitious zero-carbon emission target requires effort from several stakeholders across the nations, up from technology advancement and transformation of current industrial activities down to the reforming of policies and regulations to facilitate socioeconomic development sectors associated with GHG emissions.

(A) Timeline of major UNFCCC actions on climate change. (B) Potential pathways for CO2 utilization (IEA, 2019).

To control the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main culprit of global GHG emission, new technology pathways related to CO2 capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) have been widely studied over the past decades. Figure 1B illustrates the potential pathways for the utilization of CO2 in the industry. In general, CO2 collected on-site can be either: 1) directly used as a heat transfer fluid or feedstock/solvent in manufacturing processes or; 2) converted into other derivatives, such as fuels, hydrocarbons, and building materials following respective chemical synthesis routes. Currently, the established technologies are carbon capture with amine process, direct capture from air with underground deposit, and carbon capture integrated with bioenergy plant (IEA, 2021a). According to the recent report by IEA, the overall cost of carbon capture can be in a broad range of USD15-25/t CO2 (for CCUS from natural gas processing) to USD130-340/t CO2 (for direct capture), subject to the quality of CO2 streams and the technology applied (IEA, 2021). These technologies are costly but necessary to achieve a zero-carbon emission goal. Therefore, the continuous advancement in CCUS technologies is an on-going process to improve their availability and cost effectiveness for large-scale, practical deployment.

 Recent Technological Advancements in the Photoreduction of CO<sub>2</sub>

The transformation of CO2 into energy bearing hydrocarbon compounds has gained incessant research interest in recent years (Creutzig, et al., 2017; Alsayegh et al., 2020). Converting CO2 generated from a combustion process into hydrocarbon fuels offers attractive solution to close the carbon-fuel cycle (Ulmer et al., 2019). Ideally, for the derivation of completely renewable hydrocarbon fuels from CO2, the entire synthesis route should have minimal carbon emission and be free from fossil fuel usage. With this aim, much attention has been placed on using solar energy as the future energy source. Nevertheless, the practical implementation of CO2 photoreduction technologies necessitates the development of highly efficient, robust, photo-driven materials and systems; these have been hot research areas in recent years. Thus, in this perspective, the latest technological advances in the photo-driven reduction of CO2 are summarized and discussed with comments of their respective advantages and existing limitations. The three primary CO2 reduction systems covered are: 1) the photocatalytic CO2 reduction; 2) the photoelectrochemical (PEC) pathway as well as 3) the photovoltaic-integrated systems.

Photocatalytic CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction

The efficiency of photocatalytic CO2 reduction lies in the design of the photocatalyst. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to tailor the electronic structures of photocatalysts, with efforts to modulate the reaction paths and activation energy barriers, thereby enhancing the photoactivity and product selectivity (Wang H.-N. et al., 2021). In recent years, significant research progress has been witnessed in photocatalysis. A myriad of novel photocatalysts with 0D (zero-dimensional, i.e., quantum dots), 1D (one-dimensional, i.e., nanotubes, nanorods), 2D (two-dimensional, i.e., atomic layers, nanosheets, nanoplates) and 3D (three-dimensional, i.e., hollow nanostructures, nanospheres, microspheres) structures have been developed (; Kong et al., 2017; Kong et al., 2019; He et al., 2019; Kong et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2020; Wang J. et al., 2020; Ke et al., 2021; Li L. et al., 2021). The photoactivities are highly dependent on the architectures of the photocatalysts as the light trapping capability, surface active sites, electron-hole pairs separation and transportation pathways of photocatalysts are greatly affected by the structures. To improve the photoresponse of catalysts, a number of strategies have been adopted to reduce the bandgap of photocatalysts by integration of dopants, sensitizers, co-catalysts, heteroatoms or inducing surface defects (Chen et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020; Miao et al., 2021; Pan et al., 2021). For instance, introducing oxygen vacancy (OV) onto bismuth tungstate could expand the light absorption spectrum of the photocatalyst from UV to near infrared (Kong et al., 2016). The OV-induced defect states play indispensable role to trap photoinduced electrons, hence improving the electron–hole pair separation and inhibiting the direct recombination of photogenerated charge carriers. In this photocatalyst structure, near infrared light was harvested through sub-bands excitation from OV-induced defect states to the conduction band of bismuth tungstate (Figure 2A). To promote the separation and transportation of photoinduced charge carriers, Type-II, Z-scheme or p-n heterojunctions are often introduced to the composite photocatalysts to prolong the lifetime of charge carriers so that more electrons can take part in the CO2 reduction reaction (Jiang et al., 2020; Li S. et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021). Since CO2 reduction can only take place on the surface active sites, many recent researches focus on crystal facet engineering in order to maximize the exposure of most active facets (Kong et al., 2018; Jatav et al., 2021). Besides, decreasing the thickness of 2D materials to ultrathin-nanoscale or even atomic layers can endow ultrafast transportation of charge carriers from interior to the surface of photocatalysts along with large exposure of active sites to boost CO2 adsorption and activation (Han et al., 2021; Teh et al., 2021).

(A) Mechanisms for photocatalytic CO2 reduction over pristine and oxygen-deficient bismuth tungstate (Kong et al., 2016), (B) Mechanisms for photoreduction of CO2 into CO over COF-367-Co nanosheets with [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as photosensitizer and ascorbic acid as electron donor (Liu et al., 2019). (C) Biocathode thin film derived from a polydopamine (PDA) matrix copolymerized with an enzyme (FDH) and its cofactor (NADH) (Lee et al., 2016), (D) Dual-electrodes PEC–PEC tandem cell consisting a SrTiO3-x photoanode and Ru(MeCN)CO2C3Py-P/TiO2/N,Zn-Fe2O3/Cr2O3 photocathode (Sekizawa et al., 2018). (E) PV–PEC tandem cell comprising an Au-CdTe@ZnTe@ZnO NR photocathode-perovskite solar cell and a cobalt bicarbonate (Co-Ci) anode (Jang et al., 2016), (F) PV–GDE-based flow electrolyser cell employing NiFe anode and Au25 cathode (Kim B. et al., 2019), (G) Schematic of CO2 reduction reaction on Au25-anchored GDE (MPL = microporous layer) (Cheng et al., 2020).

Other than the conventional semiconductor photocatalysts, molecular photocatalysts have received much attention in the past few years. In another reported work, CO production rate of up to 10,162 μmol g−1 h−1 was obtained using COF-367-Co nanosheets under visible light illumination with [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2 (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) as the photosensitizer (Figure 2B) (Liu et al., 2019). The Photosensitizer plays a pivotal role where it absorbs incident light and converts it to photon energy that activates the nearby photocatalyst. Very recently, a molecularly engineered, scalable photocatalyst sheet with solar-to-formate conversion efficiency of 0.08 ± 0.01% and product selectivity of 97 ± 3% for formate were reported. Notably, in this setup, the photoreduction of CO2 was realized without using any sacrificial reagents; however, the photocatalytic system is complex, which comprises of Rh, La, SrTiO3, BiVO4, RuO2, Au, and phosphonated cobalt(II) bis(terpyridine) (Wang Q. et al., 2020).

 PEC CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction

PEC CO2 reduction, which uses electricity as an aide, enables higher conversion efficiencies and offers more design room owing to the wider selection of exploitable materials and configurations. For a commercially competitive device, PEC materials and cell design should approach high product selectivity with photocurrent of 7 mAcm−2 (corresponding to a 10% solar-to-fuel efficiency) and minimum bias requirement in the simplest possible system (Kumaravel et al., 2020). Although single-semiconductor configurations in photoanode- or photocathode-driven CO2 reduction reactions provide the greatest simplicity, they face elevated requirements, needing larger biases to achieve high system efficiencies (Kim J. H. et al., 2019). It is worth recognizing that higher photocurrent and lower onset potential values have generally been linked to catalytically-active materials which can overcome the high kinetic overpotential of the CO2 reduction half-reaction, and by a lesser degree, the optical and charge transport properties of the photoelectrode. Single-junction expensive PV-grade materials such as Si (Fung et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2018; Rao et al., 2018), GaN (DuChene et al., 2018; Sekimoto et al., 2016), InP (Kaneco et al., 2006a; Kaneco et al., 2006b; Qiu et al., 2015; Zeng et al., 2015) and ZnTe (Jang et al., 2014; Jang et al., 2015) with excellent optical and charge transport properties have been extensively studied. Nevertheless, these materials possess poor catalytic sites for CO2 reduction, which usually offer little to no redeeming improvements in the PEC activity as compared to those of more catalytically-active copper-based (Ghadimkhani et al., 2013; Won et al., 2014; de Brito et al., 2015; Kang et al., 2015; Kang and Park, 2017; Lee et al., 2018) or molecular metal-complex (Arai et al., 2011; Jeon et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2016; Kumagai et al., 2017) systems, whose activities have hitherto remained unparalleled.

Recently, integrating microbes and enzymes into biocathodes (Figure 2C) have shown massive success in lowering bias requirements due to their innate capacity to catalyze a range of CO2 metabolic processes (Fu et al., 2018; Kuk et al., 2019; Sokol et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2021). Despite the high bias requirement in single-junction configurations, bias-free photoanode-driven CO2 reduction were realized by the microbial TiO/CdS–Methanobacterium (Xiao et al., 2020) and enzymatic CoPi/BiVO4–PDA/NADH/FDH (Lee et al., 2016) hybrid systems, reaching unprecedented single-junction solar conversion efficiencies of 1.28 and 0.042%, respectively. Moreover, higher conversion efficiencies and lower biases have also been achieved in the more complex, dual photoanode-photocathode tandem configurations, owing to their improved spectral absorption, cumulative photo-potential and Z-schematic band arrangement which better meets the voltage and band-edge requirements for CO2 reduction. A seminal work by Arai et al. reported among the highest solar-to-chemical conversion efficiency of 0.14% to formate, which approaches that of the biological plant switchgrass (0.2%), using a SrTiO3 photoanode and InP[RuCP] photocathode (Arai et al., 2013). While more recently, the combination of SrTiO3-x photoanode and Ru(MeCN)CO2C3Py-P/TiO2/N,Zn-Fe2O3/Cr2O3 photocathode (Figure 2D) can yield a comparable efficiency of 0.15%, by alternately employing more abundant and cheaper multilayer metal oxides with efficient interfaces (Sekizawa et al., 2018).

 Photovoltaic-Assisted CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction

Photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical (PV-PEC) schemes are another attractive option to achieve spontaneous CO2 reduction at the expense of higher system complexity. This is since voltage requirement for CO2 reduction can be offset by the additional bias generated from the PV cell. The WO3/dye-sensitized solar cells tandem photoanode with CuxO wire-array cathode, is by far, one of the most efficient PV-PEC systems with a solar-to-CO efficiency of 2.5% (Nath et al., 2016). On the other hand, an Au-decorated triple layered ZnO@ZnTe@CdTe core-shell nanoarray photocathode in tandem with CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cell and a Co-Ci anode, which produced CO with a 0.35% conversion efficiency, was reported (Figure 2E) (Jang et al., 2016). Balancing light absorbance in the PV and PEC cell however remains a challenging aspect which has prohibitively restricted conversion efficiencies to mostly below <0.1% (Kuk et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2019; Andrei et al., 2020). Zhou et al., on the other hand, reported an exceptionally high efficiency of ∼10% by PV-PEC using a buried III-V tandem photoanode GaAs/InGaP/TiO2/Ni and a Pd/C cathode by means of a bipolar membrane (Zhou et al., 2016). The use of a bipolar membrane enabled the seamless coupling between two electrodes and electrolytes at different pH values, each optimized respectively for oxygen-evolution (pH 13.7) and CO2 reduction reaction (pH 8.0), which overall lowered the combined cell overvoltage.

A higher efficiency range of 5–20% has usually been acquired in PV-EC configurations, where semiconductor-liquid-junctions are eliminated (Schreier et al., 2015; Bullock et al., 2017; Arai et al., 2019). Some notable works were by Schreier et al. which attained a solar-to-CO efficiency of 13.4% by pairing a three-junction GaInP/GaInAs/Ge PV cell to a CO2-to-CO electrolyser equipped with a bipolar membrane (Schreier et al., 2017). More recently, the applications of gas diffusion electrodes (GDE) in electrolyser flow cell designs have afforded record-breaking efficiencies. The use of GDEs permit a semi-gas-phase operation at the cathode compartment, allowing higher current densities by circumventing the mass-transfer limitation of CO2 in aqueous system. Through directly connecting a high-efficiency PV cell and a GDE-based flow electrolyser (Figures 2F,G), Kim B. et al. (2019) and Cheng et al. (2020) have achieved a CO2-to-CO efficiency of as high as 18.0 and 19.1%, respectively. Though it should be noted that while higher efficiencies have been achieved, this comes at the price of greater device complexity and cost, and a techno-economic assessment is required to ensure that these enhanced performances offer worthwhile advantages over the simpler single-junction devices. Ultimately, the ideal choice for PEC materials and cell design should strike the perfect balance between maximizing conversion efficiency and minimizing system cost.

 Challenges and Future Prospects

Desptite its great significance, the photoreduction technology is still far from commercialization and the complex reaction system curtails its practical applications. Technology readiness level (TRL), a measurement system that assesses the maturity level of a particular technology, can be used as an indicator to gauge the readiness of the photoreduction technology for full commercial deployment. Currently, the TRL of the photoreduction of CO2 remains low at TRL 3 to 4 (Jarvis and Samsatli, 2018). Most of the research findings reported are limited to the laboratory-scale and revolve around the development of photocatalytic materials. There are only a handful of work on pilot-scale operations at low capacity. To make this technology feasible for commercial scale production, the technology must achieve at least TRL 6 or 7 for demonstrating in the relevant environment. It is anticipated that at least five to ten years of further research is needed before carbon photoreduction technology can be practically deployed (The Global CO2 Initiative, 2016).

Another key aspect is the fabrication of catalyst from inexpensive, non-toxic and abundantly available elements. To date, a diverse range of photo(electrochemical)catalysts has been reported to be efficient for CO2 photoreduction in various reactor set-ups. The vast majority of these materials are carefully tailored using multiple dopants to achieve high efficiency and selectivity. The introduction of rare earth elements as dopants or co-catalysts, such as Ce/TiO2 (Xiong et al., 2015), monometallic cerium layered double hydroxides (Ye et al., 2017), La/g-CNT (Muhammad et al., 2020), La0.225Bi0.775O1.5 (Wang Y. et al., 2021) and yttrium-doped H-Titanate (Lu et al., 2019), Re(CO)3(bpy)Cl (Adams et al., 2018) etc., will increase the overall cost of the photoreduction and pose environmental issues.

Another challenge of CO2 photoreduction lies within the product selectivity and yield. Taking methane (CH4) as an example, CO2 photoreduction under visible light irradiation could yield 3–12 times more CO than CH4. (Cheng et al., 2017; Raziq et al., 2017; Thompson et al., 2020). The stark difference in yield is attributed to the preferred formation of CO over CH4, as the former only requires two electrons while the latter requires eight. Interestingly, other researchers have also reported contrasting results where a higher yield of CH4 was observed over CO (Wang et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021). The difference in the results is due to the unique characteristics of the photocatalysts used. This prompts the need for selectivity studies to tailor the photocatalyst to maximise its yield for the desired products. Additionally, water plays an essential role in CO2 conversion as it serves as both the electron and proton donor. Therefore, in catalytic CO2 reduction reactions, be it photocatalysis, PEC or PV-EC, the competing reaction of water reduction is fundamentally unavoidable. The aforementioned reaction effectively reduces the yield of the intended product by reducing the electrons available for CO2 photoreduction.

The CO2 photoreduction pathway can be regarded as a green process since the reaction is merely powered by light energy. This, however, poses an important challenge to the commercialization of the technology. The incident light intensity is known to be one of the most important factors that controls the efficiency of a CO2 photoreduction process (Tan et al., 2017). As such, the potential for industrial-scale operation of CO2 photoreduction is largely constrained by regional solar intensity which is dependent on geographical factors. Commercialization of CO2 photoreduction could be relatively more challenging in countries or continents with lower solar intensity. For instance, the United Kingdom is reported to have an average solar irradiance of 101.2 W m−2, ranging from 71.8 W m−2–128.4 W m−2 depending on the geographical location in the country (Burnett et al., 2014). This value is much lower as compared to tropical countries which has an average annual solar irradiance of approximately 10-fold higher, ranging between 600 and 900 W m−2 (Mohammad et al., 2020). A higher level of solar irradiance is important to ensure that sufficient photon energy is available for activation of the photocatalyst to drive the CO2 reduction reaction (Sichel et al., 2017). As such, a higher performance photo(electrochemical)catalyst is necessary to overcome this barrier for the countries with lower solar irradiance.

With the increase in the awareness of sustainability processing, circular economy of the photoreduction system could be another focus of study. The efficiency of the photo(electrochemical)catalyst no doubt plays key role to these reaction pathways. However, one should not overlook the potential environmental impact of the use of the materials, if we are to upscale these technologies for large-scale reduction of CO2. In principal, a suitable photocatalyst material should not have significant impact to the environment, is green (or less toxic), and easy to handle. Extensive studies on the lifespan and reusability of photocatalyst materials could be the next focus to make this technology more economical and environmentally viable.

 Conclusion

Photo-driven technologies are undoubtedly the most sustainable and green solution for the conversion of CO2 into energy-rich hydrocarbon derivatives. These processes employ the power of the sun as the only resource to attain the Gibbs free energy of the CO2 reduction reaction; thus rendering it fossil fuel-free with markedly lower carbon footprint as compared to the conventional hydrothermal reactions or electrolysis. With the global pledge to achieve net zero-carbon emission by 2050, the development of emerging technologies in CO2 utilization must be fast-tracked. In addition, with the recent interest in the exploration of Mars, a planet consisting of 95% CO2 and a solar irradiation of 586 W m−2, it would be extremely beneficial to utilize its atmosphere to produce sustainable fuels for interplanetary travels. Despite great strides made in the field, the implementation and up-scaling of these photo-driven technologies for commercial applications remain a great hurdle even up till today. As highlighted in the previous sections, this is mainly ascribed to the constraints of solar energy potential as well as low product selectivity and yield. Intensified research is needed in the areas of materials discovery and innovative photoreactor designs. The resolution of these obstacles could bring about the successful industrialization of CO2 photoreduction technologies in the near future, which could ultimately pave the way for a greener and more sustainable tomorrow.

 Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

 Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

 Funding

This work was financially supported by Monash University Malaysia under the MUM-ASEAN Research Grant Scheme (Ref. no: ASE-000010).

 Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

 References Adams F. Pschenitza M. Rieger B. (2018). Yttrium‐Catalyzed Synthesis of Bipyridine‐Functionalized AB‐Block Copolymers: Micellar Support for Photocatalytic Active Rhenium‐Complexes. ChemCatChem 10, 4309–4316. 10.1002/cctc.201801009 Alsayegh S. O. Varjian R. Alsalik Y. Katsiev K. Isimjan T. T. Idriss H. (2020). Methanol Production Using Ultrahigh Concentrated Solar Cells: Hybrid Electrolysis and CO2 Capture. ACS Energ. Lett. 5, 540–544. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02455 Andrei V. Reuillard B. Reisner E. (2020). Bias-free Solar Syngas Production by Integrating a Molecular Cobalt Catalyst with Perovskite-BiVO4 Tandems. Nat. Mater. 19, 189–194. 10.1038/s41563-019-0501-6 Arai T. Sato S. Kajino T. Morikawa T. (2013). Solar CO2 Reduction Using H2O by a Semiconductor/metal-Complex Hybrid Photocatalyst: Enhanced Efficiency and Demonstration of a Wireless System Using SrTiO3 Photoanodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1274–1282. 10.1039/C3EE24317F Arai T. Sato S. Sekizawa K. Suzuki T. M. Morikawa T. (2019). Solar-driven CO2 to CO Reduction Utilizing H2O as an Electron Donor by Earth-Abundant Mn-Bipyridine Complex and Ni-Modified Fe-Oxyhydroxide Catalysts Activated in a Single-Compartment Reactor. Chem. Commun. 55, 237–240. 10.1039/C8CC07900E Arai T. Tajima S. Sato S. Uemura K. Morikawa T. Kajino T. (2011). Selective CO2 Conversion to Formate in Water Using a CZTS Photocathode Modified with a Ruthenium Complex Polymer. Chem. Commun. 47, 12664–12666. 10.1039/C1CC16160A Burnett D. Barbour E. Harrison G. P. (2014). The UK Solar Energy Resource and the Impact of Climate Change. Renew. Energ. 71, 333–343. 10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.034 Chen S. Hai G. Gao H. Chen X. Li A. Zhang X. (2021). Modulation of the Charge Transfer Behavior of Ni(II)-doped NH2-MIL-125(Ti): Regulation of Ni Ions Content and Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Performance. Chem. Eng. J. 406, 126886. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126886 Chen W. Liu X. Han B. Liang S. Deng H. Lin Z. (2020). Boosted Photoreduction of Diluted CO2 through Oxygen Vacancy Engineering in NiO Nanoplatelets. Nano Res. 14, 730–737. 10.1007/s12274-020-3105-1 Cheng W.-H. Richter M. H. Sullivan I. Larson D. M. Xiang C. Brunschwig B. S. (2020). CO2 Reduction to CO with 19% Efficiency in a Solar-Driven Gas Diffusion Electrode Flow Cell under Outdoor Solar Illumination. ACS Energ. Lett. 5, 470–476. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02576 Cheng X. Dong P. Huang Z. Zhang Y. Chen Y. Nie X. (2017). Green Synthesis of Plasmonic Ag Nanoparticles Anchored TiO2 Nanorod Arrays Using Cold Plasma for Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 . J. CO2 Utilization 20, 200–207. 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.04.009 Creutzig F. Agoston P. Goldschmidt J. C. Luderer G. Nemet G. Pietzcker R. C. (2017). The Underestimated Potential of Solar Energy to Mitigate Climate Change. Nat. Energ. 2, 17140. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 de Brito J. F. Araujo A. R. Rajeshwar K. Zanoni M. V. B. (2015). Photoelectrochemical Reduction of CO2 on Cu/Cu2O Films: Product Distribution and pH Effects. Chem. Eng. J. 264, 302–309. 10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.081 Deb Nath N. C. Choi S. Y. Jeong H. W. Lee J.-J. Park H. (2016). Stand-alone Photoconversion of Carbon Dioxide on Copper Oxide Wire Arrays Powered by Tungsten Trioxide/dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Dual Absorbers. Nano Energy 25, 51–59. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.025 DuChene J. S. Tagliabue G. Welch A. J. Cheng W.-H. Atwater H. A. (2018). Hot Hole Collection and Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction with Plasmonic Au/p-GaN Photocathodes. Nano Lett. 18, 2545–2550. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00241 European Commission (). 2030 Climate & Energy Framework. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2030_en (Accessed June 25, 2021). Fu Q. Xiao S. Li Z. Li Y. Kobayashi H. Li J. (2018). Hybrid Solar-To-Methane Conversion System with a Faradaic Efficiency of up to 96. Nano Energy 53, 232–239. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.051 Fung C.-M. Tang J.-Y. Tan L.-L. Mohamed A. R. Chai S.-P. (2020). Recent Progress in Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials for Photocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Transformation into Solar Fuels. Mater. Today Sustainability 9, 100037. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2020.100037 Ghadimkhani G. de Tacconi N. R. Chanmanee W. Janaky C. Rajeshwar K. (2013). Efficient Solar Photoelectrosynthesis of Methanol from Carbon Dioxide Using Hybrid CuO-Cu2O Semiconductor Nanorod Arrays. Chem. Commun. 49, 1297–1299. 10.1039/C2CC38068D Gov U. K. (2020). UK Sets Ambitious New Climate Target Ahead of UN Summit. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-sets-ambitious-new-climate-target-ahead-of-un-summit (Accessed July 6, 2021). Gurudayal G. Bullock J. Srankó D. F. Towle C. M. Lum Y. Hettick M. (2017). Efficient Solar-Driven Electrochemical CO2 Reduction to Hydrocarbons and Oxygenates. Energ. Environ. Sci. 10, 2222–2230. 10.1039/C7EE01764B Han S.-G. Ma D.-D. Zhou S.-H. Zhang K. Wei W.-B. Du Y. (2021). Fluorine-tuned Single-Atom Catalysts with Dense Surface Ni-N4 Sites on Ultrathin Carbon Nanosheets for Efficient CO2 Electroreduction. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 283, 119591. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119591 He Y. Rao H. Song K. Li J. Yu Y. Lou Y. (2019). 3D Hierarchical ZnIn2S4 Nanosheets with Rich Zn Vacancies Boosting Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1905153. 10.1002/adfm.201905153 Hu Y. Chen F. Ding P. Yang H. Chen J. Zha C. (2018). Designing Effective Si/Ag Interface via Controlled Chemical Etching for Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A. 6, 21906–21912. 10.1039/C8TA05420G Huang X. Shen Q. Liu J. Yang N. Zhao G. (2016). A CO2 Adsorption-Enhanced Semiconductor/metal-Complex Hybrid Photoelectrocatalytic Interface for Efficient Formate Production. Energ. Environ. Sci. 9, 3161–3171. 10.1039/C6EE00968A IEA (2021a). About CCUS. Paris: IEA. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/about-ccus (Accessed Oct 19, 2021). IEA (2021). Is Carbon Capture Too Expensive. Paris: IEA. Available at: https://www.iea.org/commentaries/is-carbon-capture-too-expensive (Accessed Oct 15, 2021). IEA (2019). Putting CO2 to Use: Creating Value from Emissions. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/publications/putting-co2-to-use-dfeabbf4-en.htm (Accessed June 25, 2021). Jang J.-W. Cho S. Magesh G. Jang Y. J. Kim J. Y. Kim W. Y. (2014). Aqueous-Solution Route to Zinc Telluride Films for Application to CO2 Reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 5852–5857. 10.1002/anie.201310461 Jang Y. J. Jang J.-W. Lee J. Kim J. H. Kumagai H. Lee J. (2015). Selective CO Production by Au Coupled ZnTe/ZnO in the Photoelectrochemical CO2 Reduction System. Energ. Environ. Sci. 8, 3597–3604. 10.1039/C5EE01445J Jang Y. J. Jeong I. Lee J. Lee J. Ko M. J. Lee J. S. (2016). Unbiased Sunlight-Driven Artificial Photosynthesis of Carbon Monoxide from CO2 Using a ZnTe-Based Photocathode and a Perovskite Solar Cell in Tandem. ACS Nano 10, 6980–6987. 10.1021/acsnano.6b02965 Jarvis S. M. Samsatli S. (2018). Technologies and Infrastructures Underpinning Future CO2 Value Chains: A Comprehensive Review and Comparative Analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 85, 46–68. 10.1016/j.rser.2018.01.007 Jatav S. Liu J. Herber M. Hill E. H. (2021). Facet Engineering of Bismuth Molybdate via Confined Growth in a Nanoscale Template toward Water Remediation. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 13, 18713–18723. 10.1021/acsami.1c01144 Jeon J. H. Mareeswaran P. M. Choi C. H. Woo S. I. (2014). Synergism between CdTe Semiconductor and Pyridine - Photoenhanced Electrocatalysis for CO2 reduction to Formic Acid. RSC Adv. 4, 3016–3019. 10.1039/C3RA44410D Jiang Y. Liao J.-F. Chen H.-Y. Zhang H.-H. Li J.-Y. Wang X.-D. (2020). All-Solid-State Z-Scheme α-Fe2O3/Amine-RGO/CsPbBr3 Hybrids for Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Chem. 6, 766–780. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.01.005 Kaneco S. Katsumata H. Suzuki T. Ohta K. (2006a). Photoelectrocatalytic Reduction of CO2 in LiOH/methanol at Metal-Modified P-InP Electrodes. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 64, 139–145. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.11.012 Kaneco S. Katsumata H. Suzuki T. Ohta K. (2006b). Photoelectrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide at P-type Gallium Arsenide and P-type Indium Phosphide Electrodes in Methanol. Chem. Eng. J. 116, 227–231. 10.1016/j.cej.2005.12.014 Kang U. Choi S. K. Ham D. J. Ji S. M. Choi W. Han D. S. (2015). Photosynthesis of Formate from CO2 and Water at 1% Energy Efficiency via Copper Iron Oxide Catalysis. Energ. Environ. Sci. 8, 2638–2643. 10.1039/C5EE01410G Kang U. Park H. (2017). A Facile Synthesis of CuFeO2 and CuO Composite Photocatalyst Films for the Production of Liquid Formate from CO2 and Water over a Month. J. Mater. Chem. A. 5, 2123–2131. 10.1039/C6TA09378G Ke X. Zhang J. Dai K. Fan K. Liang C. (2021). Integrated S‐Scheme Heterojunction of Amine‐Functionalized 1D CdSe Nanorods Anchoring on Ultrathin 2D SnNb2O6 Nanosheets for Robust Solar‐Driven CO2 Conversion. Sol. RRL 5, 2000805. 10.1002/solr.202000805 Kim B. Seong H. Song J. T. Kwak K. Song H. Tan Y. C. (2019a). Over a 15.9% Solar-To-CO Conversion from Dilute CO2 Streams Catalyzed by Gold Nanoclusters Exhibiting a High CO2 Binding Affinity. ACS Energ. Lett 5, 749–757. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02511 Kim J. H. Hansora D. Sharma P. Jang J.-W. Lee J. S. (2019b). Toward Practical Solar Hydrogen Production - an Artificial Photosynthetic Leaf-To-Farm challenge. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1908–1971. 10.1039/C8CS00699G Kong X. Y. Choo Y. Y. Chai S.-P. Soh A. K. Mohamed A. R. (2016). Oxygen Vacancy Induced Bi2WO6 for the Realization of Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction over the Full Solar Spectrum: from the UV to the NIR Region. Chem. Commun. 52, 14242–14245. 10.1039/c6cc07750a Kong X. Y. Lee W. Q. Mohamed A. R. Chai S.-P. (2019). Effective Steering of Charge Flow through Synergistic Inducing Oxygen Vacancy Defects and P-N Heterojunctions in 2D/2D Surface-Engineered Bi2WO6/BiOI cascade: Towards superior Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Activity. Chem. Eng. J. 372, 1183–1193. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.001 Kong X. Y. Ng B.-J. Tan K. H. Chen X. Wang H. Mohamed A. R. (2018). Simultaneous Generation of Oxygen Vacancies on Ultrathin BiOBr Nanosheets during Visible-Light-Driven CO2 Photoreduction Evoked superior Activity and Long-Term Stability. Catal. Today 314, 20–27. 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.04.018 Kong X. Y. Tan W. L. Ng B.-J. Chai S.-P. Mohamed A. R. (2017). Harnessing Vis-NIR Broad Spectrum for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction over Carbon Quantum Dots-Decorated Ultrathin Bi2WO6 Nanosheets. Nano Res. 10, 1720–1731. 10.1007/s12274-017-1435-4 Kong X. Y. Tong T. Ng B.-J. Low J. Zeng T. H. Mohamed A. R. (2020). Topotactic Transformation of Bismuth Oxybromide into Bismuth Tungstate: Bandgap Modulation of Single-Crystalline {001}-Faceted Nanosheets for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 12, 26991–27000. 10.1021/acsami.9b15950 Kuk S. K. Ham Y. Gopinath K. Boonmongkolras P. Lee Y. Lee Y. W. (2019). Continuous 3D Titanium Nitride Nanoshell Structure for Solar‐Driven Unbiased Biocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Adv. Energ. Mater. 9, 1900029. 10.1002/aenm.201900029 Kumagai H. Sahara G. Maeda K. Higashi M. Abe R. Ishitani O. (2017). Hybrid Photocathode Consisting of a CuGaO2 P-type Semiconductor and a Ru(ii)-Re(i) Supramolecular Photocatalyst: Non-biased Visible-Light-Driven CO2 Reduction with Water Oxidation. Chem. Sci. 8, 4242–4249. 10.1039/C7SC00940B Kumaravel V. Bartlett J. Pillai S. C. (2020). Photoelectrochemical Conversion of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) into Fuels and Value-Added Products. ACS Energ. Lett. 5, 486–519. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02585 Lee K. Lee S. Cho H. Jeong S. Kim W. D. Lee S. (2018). Cu+-incorporated TiO2 Overlayer on Cu2O Nanowire Photocathodes for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Conversion of CO2 to Methanol. J. Energ. Chem. 27, 264–270. 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.04.019 Lee S. Kim S. Park C. Moon G.-h. Son H.-J. Baeg J.-O. (2020). Nafion-Assisted Noncovalent Assembly of Molecular Sensitizers and Catalysts for Sustained Photoreduction of CO2 to CO. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 3709–3717. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06797 Lee S. Y. Lim S. Y. Seo D. Lee J.-Y. Chung T. D. (2016). Light-Driven Highly Selective Conversion of CO2 to Formate by Electrosynthesized Enzyme/Cofactor Thin Film Electrode. Adv. Energ. Mater. 6, 1502207. 10.1002/aenm.201502207 Li L. Zhang Z. Ding C. Xu J. (2021a). Boosting Charge Separation and Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots by Hybridizing with P3HT. Chem. Eng. J. 419, 129543. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129543 Li S. Wang C. Liu Y. Xue B. Jiang W. Liu Y. (2021b). Photocatalytic Degradation of Antibiotics Using a Novel Ag/Ag2S/Bi2MoO6 Plasmonic P-N Heterojunction Photocatalyst: Mineralization Activity, Degradation Pathways and Boosted Charge Separation Mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 415, 128991. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128991 Liu W. Li X. Wang C. Pan H. Liu W. Wang K. (2019). A Scalable General Synthetic Approach toward Ultrathin Imine-Linked Two-Dimensional Covalent Organic Framework Nanosheets for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 17431–17440. 10.1021/jacs.9b09502 Lu D. Kumar Kondamareddy K. Fan H. Gao B. Wang J. Wang J. (2019). Highly Improved Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Removal of Cr(VI) over Yttrium Doped H-Titanate Nanosheets and its Synergy with Organic Pollutant Oxidation. Separat. Purif. Technol. 210, 775–785. 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.004 Miao Y.-F. Guo R.-T. Gu J.-W. Liu Y.-Z. Wu G.-l. Duan C.-P. (2021). Oxygen Vacancy-Rich BiO2-X: Super-active Co-catalyst on G-C3n4 for Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. J. CO2 Utilization 44, 101377. 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101377 Mohammad S. T. Al-Kayiem H. H. Aurybi M. A. Khlief A. K. (2020). Measurement of Global and Direct normal Solar Energy Radiation in Seri Iskandar and Comparison with Other Cities of Malaysia. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 18, 100591. 10.1016/j.csite.2020.100591 Muhammad A. Tahir M. Al-Shahrani S. S. Mahmood Ali A. Rather S. U. (2020). Template Free Synthesis of Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanotubes Mediated by Lanthanum (La/g-CNT) for Selective Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction via Dry Reforming of Methane (DRM) to Fuels. Appl. Surf. Sci. 504, 144177. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144177 Pan B. Wu Y. Rhimi B. Qin J. Huang Y. Yuan M. (2021). Oxygen-doping of ZnIn2S4 Nanosheets towards Boosted Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. J. Energ. Chem. 57, 1–9. 10.1016/j.jechem.2020.08.024 Qiu J. Zeng G. Ha M.-A. Ge M. Lin Y. Hettick M. (2015). Artificial Photosynthesis on TiO2-Passivated InP Nanopillars. Nano Lett. 15, 6177–6181. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02511 Rao K. R. Pishgar S. Strain J. Kumar B. Atla V. Kumari S. (2018). Photoelectrochemical Reduction of CO2 to HCOOH on Silicon Photocathodes with Reduced SnO2 Porous Nanowire Catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A. 6, 1736–1742. 10.1039/C7TA09672K Raziq F. Qu Y. Humayun M. Zada A. Yu H. Jing L. (2017). Synthesis of SnO2/B-P Codoped G-C3n4 Nanocomposites as Efficient Cocatalyst-free Visible-Light Photocatalysts for CO2 Conversion and Pollutant Degradation. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 201, 486–494. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.057 Schreier M. Curvat L. Giordano F. Steier L. Abate A. Zakeeruddin S. M. (2015). Efficient Photosynthesis of Carbon Monoxide from CO2 Using Perovskite Photovoltaics. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–6. 10.1038/ncomms8326 Schreier M. Héroguel F. Steier L. Ahmad S. Luterbacher J. S. Mayer M. T. (2017). Solar Conversion of CO2 to CO Using Earth-Abundant Electrocatalysts Prepared by Atomic Layer Modification of CuO. Nat. Energ. 2, 1–9. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.87 Sekimoto T. Hashiba H. Shinagawa S. Uetake Y. Deguchi M. Yotsuhashi S. (2016). Analysis of Products from Photoelectrochemical Reduction of 13CO2 by GaN-Si Based Tandem Photoelectrode. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 13970–13975. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03840 Sekizawa K. Sato S. Arai T. Morikawa T. (2018). Solar-Driven Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction in Water Utilizing a Ruthenium Complex Catalyst on P-type Fe2O3 with a Multiheterojunction. ACS Catal. 8, 1405–1416. 10.1021/acscatal.7b03244 Sichel C. Tello J. de Cara M. Fernández-Ibáñez P. (2007). Effect of UV Solar Intensity and Dose on the Photocatalytic Disinfection of Bacteria and Fungi. Catal. Today 129, 152–160. 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.061 Sokol K. P. Robinson W. E. Oliveira A. R. Warnan J. Nowaczyk M. M. Ruff A. (2018). Photoreduction of CO2 with a Formate Dehydrogenase Driven by Photosystem II Using a Semi-artificial Z-Scheme Architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 16418–16422. 10.1021/jacs.8b10247 Sun Z. Fang W. Zhao L. Wang H. (2020). 3D Porous Cu-NPs/g-C3n4 Foam with Excellent CO2 Adsorption and Schottky junction Effect for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 504, 144347. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144347 Tan L. L. Ong W. J. Chai S. P. Mohamed A. R. (2017). Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 with H2O over Greaphene Oxide-Supported Oxygen-Rich TiO2 Hybrid Photocatalyst under Visible Light Irradiation: Process and Kinetic Studies. Chem. Eng. J. 308, 245–255. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.09.050 Teh Y. W. Fung C.-M. Chee M. K. T. Low J. Yong S.-T. Chai S.-P. (2021). Broadening Cognizance on Atomically Thin Photocatalysts. Mater. Today 43, 198–212. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.10.034 The Global CO2 Initiative (2016). Global Roadmap for Implementing CO2 Utilization. Available at: https://assets.ctfassets.net/xg0gv1arhdr3/27vQZEvrxaQiQEAsGyoSQu/44ee0b72ceb9231ec53ed180cb759614/CO2U_ICEF_Roadmap_FINAL_2016_12_07.pdf (Assessed September 26, 2021). Thompson W. A. Sanchez Fernandez E. Maroto-Valer M. M. (2020). Probability Langmuir-Hinshelwood Based CO2 Photoreduction Kinetic Models. Chem. Eng. J. 384, 123356. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123356 Ulmer U. Dingle T. Duchesne P. N. Morris R. H. Tavasoli A. Wood T. (2019). Fundamentals and Applications of Photocatalytic CO2 Methanation. Nat. Commun. 10, 3169. 10.1038/s41467-019-10996-2 United Nations Climate Change (2009). Copenhagen Climate Change Conference - December 2009. Available at: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/past-conferences/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-december-2009/copenhagen-climate-change-conference-december-2009 (Accessed Sept 15, 2021). United Nations Climate Change (). The Paris Agreement. Available at: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement (Accessed Sept 15, 2021). United Nations Climate Change (). What Is the Kyoto Protocol. Available at: https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol (Accessed June 24, 2021). Wang F. Liu D. Wen J. Zheng X. (2021). In-situ Sulfurized In2S3/MoO3@MoS2 Heterojunction for Visible Light Induced CO2 Photoreduction. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9, 106042. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106042 Wang H.-N. Zou Y.-H. Sun H.-X. Chen Y. Li S.-L. Lan Y.-Q. (2021a). Recent Progress and Perspectives in Heterogeneous Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction through a Solid-Gas Mode. Coord. Chem. Rev. 438, 213906. 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213906 Wang J. Wang J. Li N. Du X. Ma J. He C. (2020a). Direct Z-Scheme 0D/2D Heterojunction of CsPbBr3 Quantum Dots/Bi2WO6 Nanosheets for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 12, 31477–31485. 10.1021/acsami.0c08152 Wang Q. Warnan J. Rodríguez-Jiménez S. Leung J. J. Kalathil S. Andrei V. (2020b). Molecularly Engineered Photocatalyst Sheet for Scalable Solar Formate Production from Carbon Dioxide and Water. Nat. Energ. 5, 703–710. 10.1038/s41560-020-0678-6 Wang Y. Zhang Y. Chen Y. Li Z. Zou Z. (2021b). Lanthanum Bismuth Oxide Photocatalysts for CO2 Reduction to CO with High Selectivity. Sustain. Energ. Fuels 5, 2688–2694. 10.1039/D1SE00245G Won D. H. Choi C. H. Chung J. Woo S. I. (2014). Photoelectrochemical Production of Formic Acid and Methanol from Carbon Dioxide on Metal-Decorated CuO/Cu2O-Layered Thin Films under Visible Light Irradiation. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 158-159, 217–223. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.04.021 Wu H. Kong X. Y. Wen X. Chai S. P. Lovell E. C. Tang J. (2021). Metal-Organic Framework Decorated Cuprous Oxide Nanowires for Long‐lived Charges Applied in Selective Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to CH4 . Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 8455–8459. 10.1002/anie.202015735 Xiao S. Li Z. Fu Q. Li Y. Li J. Zhang L. (2020). Hybrid Microbial Photoelectrochemical System Reduces CO2 to CH4 with 1.28% Solar Energy Conversion Efficiency. Chem. Eng. J. 390, 124530. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124530 Xiong Z. Zhao Y. Zhang J. Zheng C. (2015). Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 into Liquid Products over Cerium Doped Titania Nanoparticles Synthesized by a Sol-Gel Auto-Ignited Method. Fuel Process. Technol. 135, 6–13. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.09.017 Xu K. Chatzitakis A. Backe P. H. Ruan Q. Tang J. Rise F. (2021). In Situ cofactor Regeneration Enables Selective CO2 Reduction in a Stable and Efficient Enzymatic Photoelectrochemical Cell. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 296, 120349. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120349 Ye T. Huang W. Zeng L. Li M. Shi J. (2017). CeO2-x Platelet from Monometallic Cerium Layered Double Hydroxides and its Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 . Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 210, 141–148. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.051 Zeng G. Qiu J. Hou B. Shi H. Lin Y. Hettick M. (2015). Enhanced Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 to CO through TiO2 Passivation of InP in Ionic Liquids. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 13502–13507. 10.1002/chem.201501671 Zhou B. Kong X. Vanka S. Cheng S. Pant N. Chu S. (2019). A GaN:Sn Nanoarchitecture Integrated on a Silicon Platform for Converting CO2 to HCOOH by Photoelectrocatalysis. Energ. Environ. Sci. 12, 2842–2848. 10.1039/C9EE01339C Zhou X. Liu R. Sun K. Chen Y. Verlage E. Francis S. A. (2016). Solar-driven Reduction of 1 Atm of CO2 to Formate at 10% Energy-Conversion Efficiency by Use of a TiO2-Protected III–V Tandem Photoanode in Conjunction with a Bipolar Membrane and a Pd/C Cathode. ACS Energ. Lett 1, 764–770. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00317