In the process of re-defining Parkinson’s disease (PD) a task force is working on various symptoms which, despite being unrelated to the extra-pyramidal motor system, are now considered as fundamental features of PD (Poewe, 2008; Fornai and Ruggieri, 2013; Marras and Chaudhuri, 2016; Wei et al., 2016). Although most cardinal symptoms of PD involve the extra-pyramidal motor system, an in depth knowledge of PD patients led to describe a variety of non-motor alterations as well as pyramidal motor dysfunctions which are presently under intense scrutiny (Li et al., 2010; Fornai and Ruggieri, 2013; Fornai et al., 2013; Natale et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2015; Zou et al., 2016). In fact, the occurrence of these symptoms may be helpful to discern between various PD genotypes/phenotypes, while it provides new vistas on the variety of brainstem reticular nuclei, which may or may not, be recruited during the disease course (Chao et al., 2015). Despite being missed out for a long time or being considered as an unexpected complication of a pure extra-pyramidal motor disorder, non-motor symptoms (NMS) are now a fundamental feature of PD. At the same time NMS provides an unusual perspective to elucidate the anatomical network sub-serving a brainstem monoamine disorder (BMD) which is the anatomical core of PD. In PD, NMS are often present during the disease course (Chaudhuri et al., 2006; Li et al., 2010; Bonnet et al., 2012; Chege and McColl, 2014; Bastide et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2015). In fact, brain areas, which control extra-pyramidal motor systems concomitantly, affect other neurological and psychiatric domains. This is evident when examining several reticular brainstem nuclei, whose functions affect both extra-pyramidal motor circuitries and a variety of non-motor domains during the neuropathology of sporadic PD (S-PD; Fornai and Ruggieri, 2013). Within these sub-cortical regions a variety of activities beyond extra-pyramidal motor control take place, which explains why non-motor alterations should be expected to occur rather than being unusual in most PD patients. In a recent article, we emphasized such a concept focusing on the involvement of a number of brainstem monoamine nuclei (Fornai and Ruggieri, 2013). In this analysis, we proposed the definition of BMD as more balanced to define the neuroanatomy of PD. In fact, a constellation of nuclei belonging to the brainstem reticular formation (BRF), are affected at various disease/stage severity. There is an appreciable site-specificity, which connects neuroanatomy with the onset of NMS and this works as a general model to build a clinical anatomical correlation within various PD syndromes. Within this context, progress in neurogenetics provided a powerful tool to improve PD nosography since specific gene/protein alterations connect quite specifically with clusters of both motor and NMS, which in turn, are related to a damage in quite selective brain areas. This configures PD as a spectrum of brainstem disorders which ranges between the occurrence of solely extra-pyramidal motor symptoms, up to the coexistence of pyramidal, extra-pyramidal symptoms along with NMS. Remarkably, a deep insight in the genetics of PD, along with the progressive awareness of NMS in PD, provided two key elements, which fostered the need to re-define PD itself. This is listed in the form of three paradigms shown in Figure 1 as PD due to mutations in three different loci (Parkin; LRRK2; SNCA). Similarly, Figure 2 shows the anatomy of the BRF and highlights those reticular nuclei which are often recruited in each paradigm of PD (Parkin; LRRK2; SNCA). When combining Figures 1, 2, one may get a general correlation between PD genotype, the occurrence of specific NMS, and the recruitment of specific brainstem reticular nuclei. For instance, Parkin disease represents an almost pure extra-pyramidal motor disorder. This is well described by Doherty et al. (2013) showing the paucity of symptoms (Figure 1) and affected brain areas (Figure 2), limited to the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) dorsal tier, locus coeruleus (LC) and dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus. Conversely, the specific point mutation p.G51D in the SNCA gene (Lesage et al., 2013) or multiplications of SNCA gene itself leads to a plethora of non-motor alterations (Figure 1). In this latter SNCA-dependent syndrome, motor alterations surpass the extra-pyramidal circuitry featuring also a pyramidal disorder with fatal prognosis (Mutez et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2015; Kiely et al., 2015). The p.G51D mutation additionally shifts the disease towards multiple system atrophy (MSA). The great amount of NMS shown in Figure 1 is consistent with massive recruitment of brainstem nuclei shown in Figure 2. Roughly, in the middle of these extremes we describe most LRRK2-associated PD, which features extra-pyramidal motor symptoms along with some NMS (Zimprich et al., 2004). This resembles most SNCA point mutations but p.G51D, as well as S-PD patients (Figure 1).

The Parkin gene (OMIM 602544), codes for a protein called Parkin, a E3 ubiquitin-ligase, which tags altered proteins by ubiquitin chains (Hristova et al., 2009; Yoshii et al., 2011). The loss of function of parkin activity leads to a restricted pathology of the mesencephalic RF (SNpc; Takahashi et al., 1994), which is affected only in the ventral tier (Doherty et al., 2013). This is quite odd in PD since we are now aware that in most PD cases the pontine nucleus of LC (A6) is massively affected and represents a hallmark for pathological diagnosis (Braak et al., 2000; Dickson, 2012). Mutations in Parkin produce autosomic recessive (AR) parkinsonism with early onset. Alterations are spread over the entire gene and include deletions and duplications of one or more exons in more than 50% of cases (Matsumine et al., 1997; Kitada et al., 1998; Abbas et al., 1999; Labandeira-Garcia et al., 2011). Motor symptoms of PD patients with two Parkin mutations present with classic parkinsonism, slow disease progression and more symmetrical onset, with fewer NMS than classic PD (Lesage and Brice, 2009; Lohmann et al., 2009; Kasten et al., 2010), supporting the concept of limited pathology (Kägi et al., 2010). In line with this, the frequency of dementia in Parkin mutations matches the frequency of the general population above the age of 65 (Khan et al., 2003; Macedo et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2012). Even psychiatric symptoms are almost absent (Lohmann et al., 2009; Alcalay et al., 2014). These observations may be unexpected since the occurrence of psychiatric disorders PD patients is connected with dopamine (DA)-induced motor fluctuations. Indeed, these patients undergo DA-dependent motor fluctuations early in their life, nonetheless these motor fluctuations do not contaminate the psychiatric domain. This evidence is critical to understand the neurobiology of DA-dependent psychiatric disorders. The occurrence of fluctuations in response to DA replacement therapy is concomitant with a massive loss of DA axons (Lohmann et al., 2009). Thus, the DA replacement therapy generates peaks and valleys of extracellular DA concentrations, which trigger a non-canonical transduction pathway within post-synaptic neurons (Gerfen, 2006; Biagioni et al., 2009). When the DA axons are present, the DA substitution therapy does not generate fluctuations. In fact, the excess of DA concentrations is quickly buffered by the powerful uptake from surrounding DA terminals via the DA transporter (DAT). In PARK2 patients, the loss of DA selectively occurs in the dorsal striatum which produces motor fluctuations only consistent with the loss of ventral tier of the SNpc. In contrast, the meso-limbic DA rising from the reticular nucleus of ventral tegmental area (VTA) pathways is spared preserving DA fluctuations in the ventral striatum and brain areas, which are key for psychopathology. Other psychiatric symptoms such as depression, panic, and anxiety are absent as well, which is likely to depend on sparing 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and the NA neurons of the RF (Figure 2; Fornai et al., 2013). In fact, depressive symptoms in PD as a whole syndrome, or a few items such as apathy or anhedonia, are likely to rely on degeneration of reticular 5-HT dorsal raphe nucleus and/or NA LC nucleus (Politis and Loane, 2011). Interestingly, although PINK1 mutation carriers are clinically indistinguishable from Parkin mutation carriers, frequency of depression is higher in PINK1 carriers, calling for more detailed anatomical comparisons between these two diseases (Schneider and Klein, 2010; Ricciardi et al., 2014; Chaudhuri et al., 2015). Autonomic dysfunction often relies on medullary A1, A2 and C1 and C2 noradrenergic and adrenergic neurons, respectively, which provide the descending fibers to preganglionic sympathetic neurons (Figure 2). The absence of disease spreading caudally may explain the preservation of blood pressure, micturition, sweating and other autonomic functions in PARK2 patients (Palma and Kaufmann, 2014). This is further explained by the lack of involvement of post-ganglionic ortho-sympathetic neurons, which otherwise degenerate in most PD cases. The lack of upstream disease progression and preservation of cholinergic and noradrenergic ascending reticular pathways as shown in Figure 2 may explain why cognitive dysfunction and sleep disorders are absent in these patients. As reported for PINK1 and DJ-1, these PD patients show a largely preserved sense of smell, adding evidence to the observations that autosomal dominant forms of monogenic parkinsonism exhibit more severe olfactory impairment than the recessive ones (Yoritaka et al., 2011). Only in a few cases slight psychiatric symptoms may occur in Parkin PD patients (Cooney and Stacy, 2016; Lynch and Fujioka, 2016).

Mutations of the LRRK2 gene (leucine-rich repeat kinase 2, OMIM 609007) is considered the most common genetic cause of late-onset, autosomal-dominant (AD) familial PD (PARK8; Paisán-Ruíz et al., 2004). The gene codes for a member of the leucine-rich repeat kinase family, widely expressed in isocortex, striatum, cerebellum, BRF and hippocampus (Sweet et al., 2015).

Several LRRK2 mutations have been reported so far. These genotypes differently affect the amount of catecholamine nuclei of the BRF, and produce various NMS patterns (Vitte et al., 2010). LRRK2 overlaps with alpha-synuclein pathology in the BRF, where deposition of LRRK2 appears to anticipate alpha-synuclein pathology (Alegre-Abarrategui et al., 2008). This makes the involvement of brainstem reticular nuclei in LRRK2 PD closely resembling point SNCA mutations and idiopathic PD.

In fact, clinical data support that in LRKK2 patients the prevalence of NMS is similar to idiopatic PD (i-PD; Estanga et al., 2014; Gaig et al., 2014).

Depression is quite common and can affect up to 40% of individuals with LRRK2 mutations (Chaudhuri et al., 2006; Langston, 2006; Schrag and Schott, 2006; Shanker et al., 2011; Gaig et al., 2014; Pont-Sunyer et al., 2015). Similarly, REM sleep behavioral disorder (RBD) is quite frequent (Trinh et al., 2014). This suggests a recruitment of ascending reticular nuclei extending beyond the SNpc. In fact, just like idiopathic PD, LRRK2 involves the substantia nigra and LC (Vitte et al., 2010).

The occurrence of dementia in 17% of LRKK2 patients is lower than i-PD (Aarsland and Kurz, 2010). This appears to rely on altered synaptic activity within hippocampus. Supporting this concept, transgenic mice expressing p.G2019S LRRK2 mutations show altered long-term depression (LTD) with potential impairment of learning and memory as shown in PD patients carrying LRRK2 mutations (Shanker et al., 2011; Sweet et al., 2015). Olfactory functions is preserved in PD patients carrying the LRRK2 mutations which is confirmed in preclinical models where mice expressing p.R1441C LRKK2 mutations exhibit normal olfactory function (Tsika et al., 2014). These latter findings may be in contradiction with the classic Braak staging of PD. Nonetheless, the brainstem progression involves monoamine containing nuclei of the RF and starts from the dorsal nucleus of the vagus and nucleus solitarius (Kingsbury et al., 2010). According to Figure 2 this area corresponds roughly to the A2/C2 catecholamine region of the medulla. The cortical pathology is independent from the recruitment of the brainstem and so would be the olfactory allocortex including the olfactory bulb.

The SNCA gene (alpha-synuclein, OMIM 163890) was the first gene to be associated with familial parkinsonism (Houlden and Singleton, 2012). This gene codes for the protein alpha-synuclein which is altered in both familial PD (F-PD) and S-PD (Oczkowska et al., 2013). Both point mutations (PARK1) and gene multiplications (PARK4), have been reported to produce PD with different age at onset, penetrance and clinical motor and non-motor features (Singleton et al., 2003; Puschmann et al., 2009; Kiely et al., 2013).

The occurrence of both motor NMS in most cases of PD is now well established. This is related to the engagement of a constellation of brain areas mostly located in the core of the BRF. The severity and variety of motor symptoms and mostly the various occurrence of NMS produce different PD syndromes, which appear more and more as a variety of diseases. This is substantiated by the number of genetic alterations, which may produce PD, and it is confirmed by the variety brain nuclei which may be involved. The present manuscript suggests a clinical anatomical correlation based on different genetic alterations which produce PD. These genetic conditions were used as paradigms for a clear-cut separation of different PD syndromes. The various involvement of brainstem reticular nuclei in these three paradigms was discussed.

Evidence was provided that the onset of an almost pure extrapyramidal syndrome due to a Parkin mutation was related to a quite unusual pathology mostly confined to the ventral tier of the SNpc. On the other hand, the multiplications of the SNCA genes and the p.G51D SNCA point mutation were related to the most severe phenotype in which a plethora of NMS (psychotic and mood disorder, sleep disorder, cognitive alterations, autonomic dysfunctions) were associated with a massive involvement of several nuclei of the BRF. Remarkably the most severe condition (point mutation p.G51D is definitely considered as MSA rather than PD). In the middle of these paradigms, we described the clinical anatomical correlation in the case of most LRRK2 mutation and SNCA point mutation, which resembles S-PD. An interesting correlation was evident between specific NMS and specific brainstem reticular nuclei. This is quite remarkable for anxiety, mood and sleep disorders which associate with serotonergic neurons and lateral reticular noradrenergic nuclei. Similarly, the occurrence of autonomic dysfunctions witnesses for the involvement of the bulbar noradrenergic and adrenergic areas (A1/A2 and C1/C2, respectively). The impairment of oculo-motor activities suggests the impairment in the paramedianpontine RF, while the presence of DA-dependent psychotic symptoms relates with the involvement of the mesencephalic VTA of the RF which projects to limbic and iso-cortical regions. In the most severe phenotypes, the disease surpasses the definition of BMD and configures as a MSA where the early involvement of the brainstem is expected to spread quickly to distant brain regions also including the motor cortex and spinal cord. The spreading of symptoms in the disease course is likely to rely on the prion-like properties of key proteins such as alpha-synuclein. The variety of brain areas is not totally unexpected in the light of the remarkable branching and collateralization of the iso-dendritic neurons forming the core of the BRF which represents a powerful stream to drive physiological and altered synaptic activity.

SG: coordination and writing the review. RF: pubmed research and state of the art about genetic of parkin. FB: pubmed research and state of the art about genetic of LRRK2. CLB: pubmed research and state of the art about genetic of SNCA. RC: participated in critically revising the article. AMPG: participated in drafting the article. FL: pubmed research and state of the art about genetic of SNCA duplication and triplication. GN: participated in critically revising the article for important intellectual content. MS: participated in drafting the article. FF: coordinating and writing the article. Participated in drafting the article. Participated in critically revising the article for important intellectual content.

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.