<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2235-2988</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2026.1746200</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Real-world effectiveness and predictors of treatment failure for eravacycline in patients with <italic>Acinetobacter baumannii</italic> or <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> infections: a multicenter retrospective analysis</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Yi</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3240192/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes">
<name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>Qiaolian</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1054100/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Menglan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/349653/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>Minya</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/996933/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Yingchun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/429471/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project-administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Clinical Laboratory, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College</institution>, <city>Beijing</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College</institution>, <city>Beijing</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Qiaolian Yi, <email xlink:href="mailto:yiqiaolian@pumch.cn">yiqiaolian@pumch.cn</email>; Yingchun Xu, <email xlink:href="mailto:xuyc@pumch.cn">xuyc@pumch.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<label>&#x2020;</label>
<p>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-03-04">
<day>04</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1746200</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>14</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>12</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>09</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Li, Yi, Zhou, Lu and Xu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li, Yi, Zhou, Lu and Xu</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-03-04">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Eravacycline (ERV) is a novel synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic with broad-spectrum antibacterial efficacy against pathogens. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness of eravacycline and its correlation with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against infections caused by <italic>Acinetobacter baumannii</italic> or <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>This retrospective multicenter study investigated the real-world use of ERV in 1,796 adults with infection caused by <italic>A. baumannii</italic> or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> in China. Antimicrobial susceptibility of strains and laboratory test results during treatment were analyzed. Microbiological and clinical outcomes were assessed at the end of treatment and day 30.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The overall susceptibility rate to ERV was 96.0% (1,027/1,070), and around 98% of carbapenem-resistant isolates were susceptible to ERV. ERV had a 4-fold lower MIC<sub>90</sub> than tigecycline against both pathogens. At end of treatment, treatment success (microbiological eradication or clinical resolution) occurred in 82.6% (1,483/1,796) of the cohort with microbiological eradication achieved 76.1% (789/1,037). At day 30, infection cure was achieved in 83.57% (1,501/1,796) of the cases. Different ERV regimens (monotherapy or concomitant therapy) had no influence on the treatment and 30-day clinical outcomes. Multivariable analysis identified that elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels during treatment, bloodstream infection, sepsis and specific clinical interventions (e.g., central venous catheterization) were independent predictors of treatment failure.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The study highlights ERV&#x2019;s utility in infection of <italic>A. baumannii</italic> or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>, especially carbapenem-resistant strains.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd><italic>Acinetobacter baumannii</italic></kwd>
<kwd>antimicrobial stewardship</kwd>
<kwd>carbapenem</kwd>
<kwd>eravacycline</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic></kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (No.2024ZD0532800), and Peking Union Medical College Hospital Talent Cultivation Program (Category D, UHB12289).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="29"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="6241"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Antibiotic Resistance and New Antimicrobial drugs</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Eravacycline (ERV) is the first fully synthetic tetracycline (TET) compound which demonstrates robust activity against a wide range of pathogens, encompassing aerobic and anaerobic Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains, excluding <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and <italic>Burkholderia cenocepacia</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Sutcliffe et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Similar to other TETs, it inhibits protein synthesis through binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit. ERV has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2018 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in patients aged 18 and above (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alosaimy et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>).</p>
<p>Most existing prospective clinical trials and meta-analysis have demonstrated similar efficacy of ERV to carbapenems in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Solomkin et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Lan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Solomkin et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alosaimy et&#xa0;al., 2020b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eljaaly et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Clinical trials usually limited by sample size and have exclusively focused on the infection site rather than the causative organism. Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant <italic>Enterobacterales</italic> (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant <italic>A. baumannii</italic> (CRAB) represent formidable challenges in hospital settings. <italic>A. baumannii</italic> is responsible for a spectrum of nosocomial infections, most notably ventilator-associated pneumonia and central-line-associated bloodstream infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Mar&#xed;-Almirall et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Harding et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> is an opportunistic pathogen of grave clinical concern, characterized by a convergence of multidrug resistance, high virulence, and efficient intra- and interspecies transmissibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Lei et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Among Gram-negative pathogens, only the MIC breakpoints of ERV against <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> were provided. Clinical evaluation of ERV against <italic>A. baumannii</italic> or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>, especially carbapenem-resistant strains are lacking. More importantly, most clinical trials were conducted in western countries and clinical evaluation of ERV on Asian population is blank. In China, eravacycline is approved for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) in adults. This study reflects its real-world use across various infection sites, which includes many off-label uses reflective of clinical practice for difficult-to-treat infections.</p>
<p>On January 29, 2024, the clinical breakpoints of ERV against <italic>A. baumannii</italic> and <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> was approved by the Committee of the National Health Commission on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Standard Research (ChinaCAST) in China. Supported by data from multicenter of China, the present study analyzed 1,796 cases who were treated with ERV against infection caused by <italic>A. baumannii</italic> or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> from Sep 2023 to Sep 2024. We aimed to explore the clinical and microbiological outcomes among patients treated with ERV in the real-world setting amid Chinese population.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Study design and patient population</title>
<p>The present study was conducted among hospitalized patients (&gt;18-years-old) receipt of &#x2265;72 consecutive hours of ERV therapy for infection in participating hospitals from 21 provinces of China during September 2023 to September 2024. The data for this multicenter study were systematically obtained using a standardized &#x201c;Eravacycline Clinical Application Evaluation Data Collection Form&#x201d;, which was uniformly used by reporting physicians across all participating centers. This form was specifically designed for this study to ensure consistent and comprehensive data capture across all sites, encompassing key elements such as patient demographics, infection details, microbiological results, treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes.</p>
<p>Patients with multiple pathogens were excluded to avoid confounding variables, ensuring that the observed clinical and microbiological outcomes could be attributed specifically to the treatment of <italic>A. baumannii</italic> or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>. A total of 1,796 adult patients with <italic>A. baumannii</italic> (n=1,214) or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> (n=582) infections were included. Infection was defined by physicians according to positive culture, clinical signs, laboratory test results and imaging evidence. To differentiate infection from colonization, we required not only a positive culture but also corresponding clinical symptoms (e.g., fever, purulent sputum), elevated inflammatory markers, and/or radiological evidence of new infiltrates. The following patient characteristics were collected: demographics, underlying conditions, immunosuppressive regimen, recent surgery, medical ventilation, laboratory test results (WBC count, neutrophil count, CRP and PCT) before, at the 3<sup>rd</sup> day and the end of treatment, clinical outcomes at the end of treatment, clinical outcomes at day 30. Clinical data were systematically collected by thoroughly reviewing the medical charts that were implemented in the centralized medical software of each hospital. The following microbiological characteristics were recorded: causal pathogen(s), antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by broth microdilution and/or disk diffusion, and microbiological outcomes at the end of treatment (eradication, persistence, relapse with another pathogen). Finally, ERV treatment characteristics were recorded: dose, duration of intravenous infusion and side effects. ChinaCAST recommends that MIC &#x2264; 1mg/L by broth microdilution or disk diffusion zone diameters &#x2265;15 mm to be considered as susceptible. The MIC values reported in this study were determined quantitatively using the broth microdilution method. Concomitant therapy was defined as any therapy used in conjunction with eravacycline for &#x2265;48 continuous hours for the primary organism that eravacycline therapy was used for.</p>
<p>This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Given the retrospective observational nature of the study and the absence of any modification to patient management, the need for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee. All data were anonymized and kept confidential. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Protocol code I-23ZM0067).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Endpoint</title>
<p>The primary objective consisted of determining the microbiological and clinical outcome at the end of treatment. Microbiological outcomes including eradication, persistence and relapse with another pathogen. For cases who were unable to collect specimen for bacteria culture, clinical outcomes at the end of treatment were analyzed which included clinical resolution (clinical success): defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of clinical signs and symptoms of the index infection; clinical failure: defined as persistence or worsening of signs and symptoms, or the requirement of additional rescue therapy.</p>
<p>Secondary objectives were to determine the clinical outcome at day 30, including infection cure (resolution of all signs and symptoms, normalization of laboratory findings, and confirmed/presumed pathogen eradication), relapse (recurrence of clinical manifestations with abnormal laboratory findings), attributable mortality (death directly related to the index infection) and unattributable mortality (death from unrelated causes during follow-up).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
<p>Medians and IQRs are presented for continuous variables. Categorical variables were expressed as % (m/n) and examined using &#x3c7;<sup>2</sup>/Fisher&#x2019;s exact test. <italic>P</italic> value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to identify independent factors associated with the primary composite outcome of treatment failure and with 30-day overall mortality. Variables with a P-value &lt; 0.1 in univariate analysis were included in the initial models. A stepwise selection method was used to retain significant predictors in the final models. Results are presented as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analyses were performed and graphs were plotted using R (4.2.1) (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org">https://cran.r-project.org</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Demographics, clinical course and treatment characteristics</title>
<p>A total of 1,796 adult patients (aged over 18 years) from 21 Chinese provinces received &#x2265;72 hours of eravacycline for <italic>A. baumannii</italic> (n=1,214) or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> (n=582) infections (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). The cohort exhibited male predominance (sex ratio 1.98:1) with a median age of 62 years (IQR 50&#x2013;74). No intergroup difference was observed in median treatment duration (8 days). Patients with <italic>A. baumannii</italic> infections had higher rates of ICU admission (63.8% vs 44.2%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) and mechanical ventilation (60.0% vs 46.4%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), whereas <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> infections were associated with greater hematological comorbidities (25.8% vs 11.0%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) and neutropenia (20.6% vs 10.7%; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics and clinical information of patients.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Characteristics</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Patients infected with <italic>A. baumannii</italic></th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Patients infected with <italic>K. pneumonia</italic></th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Total</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>P</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Number</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1,214</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">582</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1,796</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Median age (IQR)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63 (50-75)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60 (48-72)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">62 (50-74)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Sex ratio (M/F)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.93</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.98</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.482</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Departments</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;ICU</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63.76% (774)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.16% (257)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57.41% (1031)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Hematology</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.43% (78)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.79% (121)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.08% (199)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Transplant</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.57% (104)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.67% (33)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.63% (137)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.039</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Respiratory</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.95% (48)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.47% (26)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.12% (74)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Emergency</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.31% (28)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.61% (21)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.73% (49)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.153</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.89% (23)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.41% (14)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.06% (37)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.592</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Others</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.1% (159)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.9% (110)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.98% (269)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Specimen type</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Sputum</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">53.79% (653)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50.17% (292)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52.62% (945)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.166</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;BALF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.47% (382)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.52% (166)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.51% (548)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.225</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Blood</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.33% (89)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.68% (68)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.74% (157)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Peritoneal fluid</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.41% (90)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.62% (56)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.13% (146)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.131</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Infection Classification</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Pneumonia</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">91.7% (1113)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">86.8% (505)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">90.1% (1618)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Lung abscess</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.1% (38)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.1% (12)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.8% (50)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.256</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Intra-abdominal infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.7% (166)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.5% (96)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.6% (262)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Bloodstream infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.7% (154)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.7% (97)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.0% (251)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.027</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Urinary tract infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.1% (25)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.3% (19)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.4% (44)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.167</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Central nervous system infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.6% (7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2% (1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4% (8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Underlying Diseases and Comorbidities</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Pulmonary diseases</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.5% (382)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.0% (134)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.7% (516)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Solid tumors</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.6% (116)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.8% (63)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.0% (179)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.449</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Hematological diseases</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.0% (133)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.8% (150)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.8% (283)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Cardiovascular diseases</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.7% (397)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.4% (177)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.0% (574)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.358</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Neurological diseases</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.4% (211)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.7% (109)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.8% (320)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.527</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Renal diseases</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.3% (271)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.3% (118)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.7% (389)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.355</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Diabetes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.1% (256)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.8% (150)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.6% (406)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.031</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;AIDS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.6% (32)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.3% (19)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.8% (51)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.549</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Rheumatic and immunological diseases</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.5% (30)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.7% (16)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.6% (46)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;History of splenectomy</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.0% (24)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.9% (5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.6% (29)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Hemodialysis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.0% (146)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.3% (60)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.5% (206)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.322</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Recent chemotherapy/radiotherapy</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.3% (113)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.0% (122)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.1% (235)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Mechanical ventilation</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60.0% (729)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">46.4% (270)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">55.6% (999)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Sepsis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.6% (371)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.4% (171)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.2% (542)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Neutropenia</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.7% (130)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.6% (120)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.9% (250)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Recent surgery</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33.9% (412)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.2% (170)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.4% (582)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.051</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Post-transplantation status</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.2% (209)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.8% (92)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.8% (301)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.496</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Long-term Corticosteroid/immunosuppressant use</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.6% (286)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.6% (143)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.9% (429)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.681</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Invasive Devices and Procedures</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Arterial catheterization</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.0% (485)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.0% (157)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.7% (642)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Central venous catheterization</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">61.1% (742)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57.0% (332)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59.8% (1074)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Endotracheal intubation</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">64.1% (778)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">48.6% (283)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59.1% (1061)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Tracheostomy</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.7% (494)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.1% (204)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38.9% (698)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.025</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Foley catheter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">61.7% (749)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">47.9% (279)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57.2% (1028)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Nasogastric tube</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63.1% (766)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52.1% (303)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59.5% (1069)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Dialysis therapy</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.9% (230)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.1% (88)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.7% (318)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.055</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Other indwelling catheters</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.0% (182)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.5% (61)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.5% (243)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Treatment characteristics</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Treatment duration of ERV (IQR)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (6-11)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (6-12)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (6-11)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.066</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Active therapy before ERV <sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.2% (488)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">48.6% (283)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.9% (771)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Meropenem</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.4% (236)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.9% (133)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.5% (369)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Tigecycline</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.3% (137)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.7% (62)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.1% (199)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Cefoperazone-Sulbactam</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.0% (122)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.5% (55)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.9% (177)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.753</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Imipenem</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.5% (55)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.7% (39)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.2% (94)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.069</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Ceftazidime-Avibactam</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.0% (37)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.1% (47)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.7% (84)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Polymyxins</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.9% (60)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.0% (23)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.6% (83)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.415</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Vancomycin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.0% (37)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.5% (26)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.5% (63)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.163</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Piperacillin-Tazobactam</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.7% (33)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.9% (17)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.8% (50)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.927</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Levofloxacin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.0% (24)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.9% (17)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.3% (41)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.278</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Moxifloxacin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.1% (25)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.4% (14)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.2% (39)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.766</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Others</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.2% (39)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.0% (23)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.5% (62)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.506</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Concomitant therapy <sup>a b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.8% (337)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.2% (112)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.0% (449)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Polymyxins</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.4% (236)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.4% (72)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.1% (308)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Cefoperazone-Sulbactam</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.0% (37)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.2% (7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.4% (44)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.028</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Imipenem</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.3% (16)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.2% (7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.3% (23)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Caspofungin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.2% (14)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3% (2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.9% (16)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Amikacin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5% (6)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.2% (7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7% (13)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.134</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Piperacillin-Tazobactam</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3% (4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7% (4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4% (8)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.283</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Amphotericin B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3% (4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5% (3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4% (7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.688</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Voriconazole</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3% (4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3% (2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3% (6)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Posaconazole</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4% (5)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2% (1)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3% (6)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.671</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Aztreonam</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2% (2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3% (2)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2% (4)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.599</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Others</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.3% (16)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.2% (7)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.3% (23)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="3" align="left">Data presented as percentage (number) or median (IQR), as appropriate.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="3" align="left">a. Total may exceed total number due to receipt of multiple antibiotics.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">b. Concomitant therapy: Antibiotic administered for &#x2265;48 continuous hours while the patient received eravacycline.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">P-value was calculated by Utest, &#x3c7;2/Fisher&#x2019;s exact test.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The distribution of infection types reflected the distinct epidemiological profiles of each pathogen. Pneumonia was the predominant manifestation for <italic>A. baumannii</italic>, occurring in 91.7% (1,113/1,214) of cases. The high acuity of these respiratory infections was underscored by the frequent requirement for ventilatory support including mechanical ventilation, endotracheal intubation, and tracheostomy, which was documented in 82.3% (916/1,113) of <italic>A. baumannii</italic> pneumonia patients. Conversely, <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> infections presented with a broader anatomical distribution. While pneumonia was also common (86.8%, 505/582), a substantial proportion of cases were bloodstream infections (16.7%, 97/582). Among patients with <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> pneumonia, 67.9% (343/505) required ventilatory support.</p>
<p>Differences were also observed in treatment patterns. Prior to eravacycline initiation, 48.6% of patients with <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> infections had received pretreatment antimicrobial therapy, with carbapenems (29.6%) and ceftazidime-avibactam (8.1%) being notable exposures. In comparison, the pretreatment exposure rate was 40.2% in the <italic>A. baumannii</italic> group, where carbapenem use was documented in 23.9% of cases and ceftazidime-avibactam in 3.0%. During eravacycline treatment, concomitant antibiotic therapy was employed in 27.8% of <italic>A. baumannii</italic> infections, predominantly with polymyxins (19.4%). This practice was less frequent in <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> infections, where 19.2% of patients received concomitant therapy, most commonly involving polymyxins (12.4%).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>The antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates</title>
<p>According to the information uploaded by participating hospitals, the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of ERV (N = 1,070), tigecycline (N = 1,398), imipenem (N = 1,023), meropenem (N = 1,014) and colistin (N = 1,143) were summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>. Eravacycline demonstrated high activity against both pathogens (overall susceptibility 96.0%, 1,027/1,070), with significantly higher susceptibility for <italic>A. baumannii</italic> versus <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> (96.9% vs 93.8%; <italic>P</italic> = 0.023). In contrast, tigecycline susceptibility was substantially lower (75.8%, 1,060/1,398).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>A. baumannii</italic></th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>K. pneumoniae</italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="left">Antimicrobial Agents</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Eravacycline</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">96.85% (738/762)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">93.83% (289/308)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Tigecycline</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">77.71% (753/969)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">71.56% (307/429)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Imipenem</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.09% (35/687)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.07% (54/336)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Meropenem</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.83% (55/702)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.06% (47/312)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Colistin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">92.94% (777/836)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">84.36% (259/307)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="left">Eravacycline susceptibility in</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Tigecycline resistant isolates</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">66.67% (16/24)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">82.35% (14/17)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Imipenem resistant isolates</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">97.74% (390/399)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">99.33% (148/149)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Meropenem resistant isolates</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">96.97% (384/396)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">98.57% (138/140)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Colistin resistant isolates</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">86.67% (26/30)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">88% (22/25)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Comparative MIC analysis of 551 isolates with MIC for both ERV and tigecycline revealed 4-fold lower geometric mean MICs for eravacycline versus tigecycline against both <italic>A. baumannii</italic> (0.588 vs 1.993 &#x3bc;g/mL; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) and <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> (0.675 vs 1.892 &#x3bc;g/mL; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). Notably, 66.7% (16/24) of tigecycline-resistant <italic>A. baumannii</italic> and 82.4% (14/17) of <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> isolates remained eravacycline-susceptible (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The <italic>in vitro</italic> antimicrobial activity of eravacycline and tigecycline. GM, geometric mean MIC (ug/mL).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-16-1746200-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four density plots compare MIC distributions for tigecycline and eravacycline against Acinetobacter baumannii (N equals four hundred one) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (N equals one hundred fifty). Tigecycline shows higher geometric means (GM: one point nine nine three for A. baumannii and one point eight nine two for K. pneumoniae) than eravacycline (GM: zero point five eight eight and zero point six seven five, respectively), with lower MIC values for eravacycline. Color shading differentiates MIC below MIC fifty, between MIC fifty and MIC ninety, and above MIC ninety. MIC values on the x-axis range from zero point zero one five to sixteen micrograms per milliliter.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Carbapenem non-susceptibility was prevalent: Only 5.1% (35/687) of <italic>A. baumannii</italic> and 16.1% (54/336) of <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> isolates were imipenem-susceptible. Eravacycline maintained &#x2265;96.9% susceptibility against carbapenem-resistant strains (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>). Colistin susceptibility was 90.6% (1,036/1,143), with eravacycline retaining activity against 86.7% (26/30) of colistin-resistant <italic>A. baumannii</italic> and 88.0% (22/25) of <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Clinical and microbiological outcomes</title>
<p>At end of treatment (EOT), microbiological outcomes were assessed in 1,037 patients. Overall microbiological eradication was 76.1% (789/1,037). Microbiological persistence occurred in 9.4% (97/1,037) and relapse in 14.6% (151/1,037) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). Among 759 patients without EOT microbiological cultures, clinical cure was achieved in 91.4% (694/759). Composite treatment failure (microbiological persistence/relapse or clinical failure) occurred in 17.4% (313/1,796) of the cohort. Treatment failure was associated with elevated inflammatory markers: Failure cases exhibited significantly higher WBC, neutrophil counts, CRP, and PCT levels at day 3 and EOT versus success cases (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold></xref>). Monotherapy (75.0%, 1,347/1,796) and concomitant therapy (25.0%, 449/1,796) yielded comparable outcomes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Laboratory test results before eravacycline treatment, at the third day and the end of eravacycline treatment. * indicates p&lt;0.05, compared by Mann-Whitney U-test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-16-1746200-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four-panel data visualization comparing dynamics of WBC, neutrophils, CRP, and PCT with box and violin plots for treatment failure (red) and infection cure (blue), with higher values in treatment failure at all timepoints; axes and units labeled; significant differences indicated by asterisks.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>The microbiological and clinical outcomes of eravacycline therapy, stratified by the primary infection site, are comprehensively detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"><bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold></xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure 3A</bold></xref>. The analysis across different infection types revealed distinct patterns of treatment efficacy. Pneumonia, being the most common infection in the cohort, demonstrated favorable outcomes with an overall microbiological eradication rate of 76.0% (723/951) at the end of treatment (EOT). Clinical resolution at EOT was achieved in 90.8% (605/666) of assessable pneumonia patients. By day 30, the infection cure rate for pneumonia was 83.6% (1353/1618), with an attributable mortality of 5.6% (91/1618).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Microbiological and clinical outcomes by different infection types.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infection Types and Outcomes</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Patients infected with <italic>A. baumannii</italic> (N = 1214)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Patients infected with <italic>K. pneumonia</italic> (N = 582)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Total</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Infection Type: Pneumonia</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Microbiological outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Eradication</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">497 (74.74%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">226 (78.75%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">723 (75.95%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Persistence</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63 (9.47%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24 (8.36%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">87 (9.14%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse with another pathogen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">105 (15.79%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37 (12.89%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">142 (14.92%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical resolution</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">409 (91.29%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">196 (89.91%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">605 (90.84%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical failure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39 (8.71%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22 (10.09%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">61 (9.16%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at day 30</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Infection cure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">924 (83.02%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">429 (84.95%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1353 (83.62%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">54 (4.85%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14 (2.77%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">68 (4.20%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Attributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59 (5.30%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32 (6.34%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">91 (5.62%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Unattributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76 (6.83%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30 (5.94%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">106 (6.55%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Infection Type: Lung abscess</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Microbiological outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Eradication</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9 (52.94%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (87.50%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16 (64.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Persistence</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (12.50%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (4.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse with another pathogen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (47.06%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (32.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical resolution</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20 (95.24%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (100.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24 (96.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical failure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (4.76%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (4.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at day 30</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Infection cure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36 (94.74%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (83.33%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">46 (92.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (8.33%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Attributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.63%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Unattributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.63%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (8.33%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (4.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Infection Type: Intra-abdominal infection</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Microbiological outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Eradication</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">89 (83.18%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25 (54.35%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">114 (74.51%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Persistence</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (9.35%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (21.74%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20 (13.07%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse with another pathogen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (7.48%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (23.91%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19 (12.42%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical resolution</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52 (88.14%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43 (86.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">95 (87.16%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical failure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (11.86%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (14.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14 (12.84%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at day 30</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Infection cure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132 (79.52%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">72 (75.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">204 (77.86%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (4.22%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (4.17%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (4.20%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Attributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (6.63%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (8.33%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19 (7.25%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Unattributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16 (9.64%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12 (12.50%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28 (10.69%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Infection Type: Bloodstream infection</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Microbiological outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Eradication</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">70 (67.96%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33 (62.26%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">103 (66.03%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Persistence</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14 (13.59%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9 (16.98%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (14.74%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse with another pathogen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19 (18.45%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (20.75%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30 (19.23%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical resolution</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43 (84.31%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37 (84.09%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">80 (84.21%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical failure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (15.69%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (15.91%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15 (15.79%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at day 30</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Infection cure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">105 (68.18%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">71 (73.20%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">176 (70.12%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14 (9.09%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (7.22%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21 (8.37%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Attributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (11.69%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (11.34%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29 (11.55%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Unattributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17 (11.04%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (8.25%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25 (9.96%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Infection Type: Urinary tract infection</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Microbiological outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Eradication</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12 (70.59%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (42.86%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15 (62.50%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Persistence</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (11.76%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (28.57%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (16.67%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse with another pathogen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (17.65%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (28.57%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (20.83%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical resolution</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (75.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9 (75.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15 (75.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical failure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (25.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (25.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (25.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at day 30</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Infection cure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (72.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13 (68.42%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31 (70.45%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (4.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (15.79%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (9.09%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Attributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (8.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (15.79%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (11.36%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Unattributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (16.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (9.09%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Infection Type: Central nervous system infection</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Microbiological outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Eradication</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (50.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (50.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Persistence</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (25.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (25.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse with another pathogen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (25.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (25.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical resolution</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (66.67%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (100.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (75.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical failure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (33.33%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (25.00%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at day 30</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Infection cure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (57.14%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (100.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (62.50%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (14.29%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (12.50%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Attributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (14.29%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (12.50%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Unattributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (14.29%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.00%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (12.50%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>The efficacy of eravacycline treatment in different pathogens <bold>(A)</bold> and isolates with different MICs <bold>(B)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-16-1746200-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Figure contains two panels. Panel A shows grouped bar charts of microbiological and clinical outcomes for A. baumannii and K. pneumoniae infections by infection type, reporting percentages for stages like eradication, persistence, relapse, and clinical failure at end of treatment and cure, relapse, and mortality at day thirty. Panel B displays a bar chart of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values in micrograms per milliliter versus number of cases, grouped by infection cure, relapse, attributable mortality, and unattributable mortality.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>For other infection types, the overall EOT microbiological eradication rates were 64.0% (16/25) for lung abscess, 74.5% (114/153) for intra-abdominal infection, 66.0% (103/156) for bloodstream infection, 62.5% (15/24) for urinary tract infection, and 50.0% (2/4) for central nervous system infection. The corresponding day 30 infection cure rates for these infection types were 92.0% (46/50), 77.9% (204/262), 70.1% (176/251), 70.5% (31/44), and 62.5% (5/8), respectively. Across all infection types, clinical resolution rates at the end of treatment were consistently high, ranging from 75.0% to 96.0%. The 30-day attributable mortality was lowest in pneumonia (5.6%) and lung abscess (2.0%), and highest in bloodstream infections (11.6%) and central nervous system infections (12.5%).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Factors associated with treatment failure</title>
<p>Among 1,070 cases with available ERV susceptibility data, infections caused by non-susceptible strains (MIC &gt;1 &#x3bc;g/mL) showed a higher rate of treatment failure at the end of treatment (23.26%, 10/43) compared to susceptible strains (12.95%, 133/1027), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.086) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"><bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold></xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure 3B</bold></xref>). Multivariable logistic regression analysis (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table 3</bold></xref>) identified several independent predictors of early treatment failure. Higher baseline white blood cell (WBC) count was associated with reduced risk (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92&#x2013;0.98, p&lt;0.001), whereas elevated inflammatory markers, including baseline CRP (OR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.99&#x2013;1.00, p=0.048) and CRP after 3 days of treatment (OR 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01&#x2013;1.01, p&lt;0.001), significantly increased the risk of failure. Increased neutrophil counts at day 3 also predicted poorer outcomes (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01&#x2013;1.07, p=0.018). Clinical interventions influenced outcomes substantially: central venous catheterization (OR 2.15, 95% CI: 1.18&#x2013;3.90, p=0.012), tracheostomy (OR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.75&#x2013;4.66, p&lt;0.001), and other indwelling catheters (OR 2.49, 95% CI: 1.27&#x2013;4.86, p=0.008) were associated with higher failure rates. In contrast, mechanical ventilation (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29&#x2013;0.93, p=0.029) and arterial catheterization (OR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.34&#x2013;0.99, p=0.048) appeared protective.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Microbiological and clinical outcomes of patients infected with susceptible or non-susceptible strains.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Outcomes</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infection of strains with MIC &gt; 1 (N = 43)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infection of strains with MIC &#x2264; 1 (N = 1027)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>P</italic></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Microbiological outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Eradication</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16 (66.67%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">488 (80.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Persistence</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (4.17%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43 (7.08%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse with another pathogen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (29.17%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76 (12.52%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at end of treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical resolution</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17 (89.47%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">406 (96.67%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Clinical failure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (10.53%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14 (3.33%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Clinical outcomes at day 30</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Infection cure</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32 (74.42%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">901 (87.73%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Relapse</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (4.65%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26 (2.53%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Attributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (9.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40 (3.89%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Unattributable mortality</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (11.63%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60 (5.84%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">P-value was calculated by&#x3c7;2/Fisher&#x2019;s exact test.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>At day 30, the overall cure rate was 83.57% (1501/1,796). Relapse occurred in 4.34% (78/1,796) of cases, and overall mortality was 12.08% (217/1,796), with 5.4% (97/1,796) attributed directly to infection. Infections caused by non-susceptible isolates were associated with significantly lower cure rates (74.4% <italic>vs</italic>. 87.7%, p=0.04) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"><bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold></xref>). This association was attenuated and lost statistical independence in the adjusted model (OR 2.73, 95%CI: 0.88-8.45, p=0.082). Multivariable analysis (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table 4</bold></xref>) indicated that elevated CRP levels at the end of treatment, was the strongest predictor of 30-day failure (OR 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02&#x2013;1.04, p&lt;0.001). Bloodstream infection (OR 2.41, 95% CI: 1.18&#x2013;4.93, p=0.016) and sepsis (OR 1.94, 95% CI: 1.01&#x2013;3.69, p=0.045) were also independent risk factors, nearly doubling the odds of failure. Invasive procedures further modulated outcomes: endotracheal intubation increased risk (OR 2.65, 95% CI: 1.21&#x2013;5.81, p=0.015), whereas mechanical ventilation was strongly protective (OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13&#x2013;0.58, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Adverse events</title>
<p>Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 41 patients (2.28%, 41/1,796). The most frequent AEs were gastrointestinal disorders (1.11%, 20/1,796) and hepatotoxicity (0.56%, 10/1,796). One patient experienced a severe AE resulting in acute liver injury.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Our study presents the largest real-world, observational analysis of clinical and microbiological outcomes for patients treated with ERV for infection caused by <italic>A. baumannii</italic> or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>. Most of patients were from ICU (57.41%) and department of hematology (11.08%), with a median age of 62 (50&#x2013;74) and various underlying medical conditions like hematological system diseases and immunosuppressant usage, as well as medical ventilation. Our cohort represents patients with difficult-to-treat infection in a real-world hospital setting.</p>
<p>The pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of eravacycline provides a crucial lens through which to interpret our clinical outcomes. Eravacycline is characterized by a high volume of distribution (ranging from ~184 to 320 L in human studies) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Connors et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhanel et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), which signifies extensive penetration into body tissues. This property is a key asset, likely contributing to the favorable clinical and microbiological outcomes observed in our cohorts with tissue-based infections such as pneumonia and intra-abdominal infections, and may also support its efficacy in bloodstream infections by ensuring adequate tissue sanctuary site penetration. Conversely, its PK profile also explains the observed trends in urinary tract infections (UTIs). Eravacycline undergoes minimal renal excretion, with studies reporting very low urinary recovery (e.g., ~2.5% in rats) and the majority of the drug being eliminated via the fecal route (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Tan et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The low urinary concentrations achieved are pharmacologically suboptimal for eradicating pathogens in the urinary tract. Consequently, the numerically lower eradication rate we observed for UTIs (62.5%), though not powered for statistical significance, is consistent with its intrinsic PK properties.</p>
<p><italic>A. baumannii</italic> usually exhibits a high drug resistance rate, and is one of the most challenging pathogens in the health care setting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ayoub Moubareck and Hammoudi Halat, 2020</xref>). The IGNITE1 trial (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Solomkin et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) demonstrated clinical cure with ERV in 8/8 patients infected with <italic>A. baumannii</italic>, of which 2 of them were confirmed CRAB. Then, the IGNITE4 trial (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Solomkin et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) showed 100% (5/5) clinical cure rate for patients infected with <italic>A. baumannii</italic>. Alosaimy et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Alosaimy et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). conducted a retrospective analysis on 46 patients treated with ERV for <italic>A. baumannii</italic> infections (69.5% of them were CRAB) and observed a 30-day mortality of 23.9%. Scott et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Scott et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) analyzed 27 patients receiving ERV for pneumonia with <italic>A. baumannii</italic>. However, they observed higher 30-day mortality (33% vs 15%; p = 0.048) and lower microbiologic cure rate (17% vs 59%; p = 0.004) compared with control group. Few studies had focused on ERV treatment of <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> infection. Study of Hise et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Van Hise et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) included 3 patients infected with <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> and clinical failure occurred in one of them. In a real-world, observational study in USA, Kunz, et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Kunz Coyne et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). reported clinical success rate of 75.7% (n = 315/416) in patients infected with Enterobacterales spp., Enterococci spp. and Acinetobacter spp. Supported by clinical and microbiological data of 1214 A<italic>. baumannii</italic> infected patients with various underlying medical conditions, we observed an eradication rate of 75.63% and a 30-day infection cure rate of 83.11%. Similar trend was also noticed in 582 K<italic>. pneumoniae</italic> infected patients, with an eradication rate of 77.09% and a 30-day infection cure rate of 84.54%. More importantly, many isolates in our study were resistant to imipenem or meropenem, and around 97% of them were susceptible to ERV. Consistently, previous <italic>in vitro</italic> studies had underscored the potency of ERV against carbapenem-resistant pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Seifert et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). We believe ERV provides a new option for carbapenem-resistant strains.</p>
<p>As a new tetracycline antibacterial agents, ERV seems to have better performance that tigecycline. Previous comparison study of ERV with tigecycline show that in terms of efficacy, ERV has a higher clinical response rate and a significantly better microbiological response rate than tigecycline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Meng et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). ERV has a 2- to 4-fold lower MIC<sub>90</sub> than tigecycline against common gram-negative bacteria in both the overall and multidrug-resistant populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Morrissey et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Similarly, we also observed 4-fold lower MIC<sub>90</sub> in ERV than tigecycline against <italic>A. baumannii</italic> or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>. This superior <italic>in vitro</italic> activity appears to translate into survival benefits in clinical practice; a recent real-world study by Guo et&#xa0;al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). involving ICU patients with CRAB pneumonia reported a notably lower 30-day mortality rate in the eravacycline group (15.2%) compared to the tigecycline group (25.0%), reinforcing the utility of eravacycline in high-acuity settings. Besides that, it has been suggested that ERV might be less likely than tigecycline to cause nausea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Scott, 2019</xref>). The safety profile of eravacycline in our large cohort was consistent with prior reports, with gastrointestinal events being the most common adverse effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Van Hise et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eljaaly et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The low incidence of hepatotoxicity (0.56%) is reassuring.</p>
<p>Previous meta-analysis did not offer a thorough analysis of the clinical outcomes associated with ERV monotherapy or combination therapy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eljaaly et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). In our study, ERV was used in monotherapy in 75% of the cases. Amid cases taken combination therapy, 68.60% of them used ERV in combination with polymyxin. However, different ERV regimens had no influence on the microbiological and clinical outcomes.</p>
<p>The multivariable analyses further revealed that persistent inflammation&#x2014;particularly elevated CRP levels at both early and late treatment phases&#x2014;was a dominant predictor of treatment failure. This association underscores the diagnostic value of inflammatory kinetics; as previously observed in severe bloodstream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia, a CRP ratio greater than 0.58 on the fourth day of therapy is a strong predictor of poor outcomes, reflecting an inadequate host or therapeutic response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">P&#xf3;voa et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">P&#xf3;voa et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In successful cases, CRP typically declines to approximately 47% of initial levels by day 4, whereas it remains nearly unchanged in non-responders (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">P&#xf3;voa et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Furthermore, the higher failure rates observed in patients with sepsis may be linked to altered pharmacokinetics. Sepsis-induced capillary leak and aggressive fluid resuscitation can significantly increase the volume of distribution, potentially leading to subtherapeutic serum concentrations of drugs with high tissue distribution like eravacycline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Blot et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Shah et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The increased risks also linked to central venous catheterization and other indwelling devices emphasize the iatrogenic contributions to treatment failure, likely through biofilm formation or secondary infections. The observation that non-susceptibility to ERV remained a strong predictor in univariate analysis but was attenuated in multivariable models suggests that its effect may be mediated or confounded by other patient factors, such as underlying comorbidities or inflammatory status.</p>
<p>Data should be interpreted with caution because of the retrospective nature of the study. As a retrospective observational study without a randomized control group, we cannot definitively establish the superiority of eravacycline over other standard therapies; our findings should be interpreted as reflecting real-world clinical utility rather than controlled comparative efficacy. Furthermore, this study was conducted exclusively within China, and the results may reflect local resistance patterns and clinical practices. Therefore, global multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings across diverse populations. Not all ERV MICs data were collected. Limited carbapenem MICs data also lead to an unprecise proportion of carbapenem-resistant strains. Information on source control measures (e.g., drainage or debridement), a critical confounder for clinical efficacy in infections such as lung abscesses and intra-abdominal infections, was not consistently available across all centers in this retrospective study and could not be analyzed. Future prospective studies should prioritize the standardized collection of this data. Furthermore, this study focused exclusively on <italic>A. baumannii</italic> and <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>. Expanding future research to include other difficult-to-treat <italic>Enterobacterales</italic> would be valuable to further establish eravacycline&#x2019;s role across a broader spectrum of Gram-negative infections. Finally, the molecular mechanisms underlying eravacycline non-susceptibility were not investigated in this study. Future work should include genomic analysis to characterize these resistance pathways.</p>
<p>The present study is the largest report of eravacycline use in China hospitals to date, ERV demonstrated promising efficacy in treating patients with infections of <italic>A. baumannii</italic> or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>, especially carbapenem-resistant strains.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Material</bold></xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p></sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>Ethical review and approval was not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the [patients/participants OR patients/participants legal guardian/next of kin] was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.</p></sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YL: Data curation, Visualization, Methodology, Conceptualization, Investigation, Software, Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. QY: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Supervision, Conceptualization, Resources, Funding acquisition. MZ: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Resources. ML: Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. YX: Supervision, Project administration, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Resources, Funding acquisition.</p></sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank the study investigators, participating doctors, coordinators, nurses, laboratory testing personnel, patients, and their families for their contributions. This study is conducted by the Expert Committee on Clinical Use of Antimicrobials and Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance in China. We appreciate the support of all the members of this committee.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1746200/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1746200/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.xlsx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Alosaimy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abdul-Mutakabbir</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kebriaei</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jorgensen</surname> <given-names>S. C. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rybak</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>a). 
<article-title>Evaluation of eravacycline: A novel fluorocycline</article-title>. <source>Pharmacotherapy</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>238</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/phar.2366</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31944332</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Alosaimy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Molina</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Claeys</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Andrade</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Truong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>King</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>b). 
<article-title>Early experience with eravacycline for complicated infections</article-title>. <source>Open Forum Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <elocation-id>ofaa071</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ofid/ofaa071</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32411809</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Alosaimy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Morrisette</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lagnf</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rojas</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>King</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pullinger</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Clinical outcomes of eravacycline in patients treated predominately for carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>e0047922</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.00479-22</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36190427</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ayoub Moubareck</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hammoudi Halat</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Insights into Acinetobacter baumannii: A Review of Microbiological, Virulence, and Resistance Traits in a Threatening Nosocomial Pathogen</article-title>. <source>Antibiotics (Basel)</source> <volume>9</volume>, <page-range>119</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics9030119</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32178356</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Blot</surname> <given-names>S. I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pea</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lipman</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>The effect of pathophysiology on pharmacokinetics in the critically ill patient--concepts appraised by the example of antimicrobial agents</article-title>. <source>Adv. Drug Delivery Rev.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.addr.2014.07.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25038549</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Efficacy and safety of eravacycline (ERV) in treating infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>867</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>875</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14787210.2024.2397663</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39258866</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Connors</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Housman</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pope</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Russomanno</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Salerno</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shore</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>Phase I, open-label, safety and pharmacokinetic study to assess bronchopulmonary disposition of intravenous eravacycline in healthy men and women</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>2113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2118</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.02036-13</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24468780</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Eljaaly</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ortwine</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shaikhomer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Almangour</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bassetti</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Efficacy and safety of eravacycline: A meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>J. Glob Antimicrob. Resist.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>424</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>428</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jgar.2021.02.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33621690</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Efficacy and safety of eravacycline combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in ICU patients: A retrospective study</article-title>. <source>Infect. Drug Resist.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>3013</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3021</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/IDR.S515207</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40548167</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Harding</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hennon</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Feldman</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Uncovering the mechanisms of Acinetobacter baumannii virulence</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>91</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro.2017.148</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29249812</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kunz Coyne</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Alosaimy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lucas</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lagnf</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Morrisette</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Molina</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Eravacycline, the first four years: health outcomes and tolerability data for 19 hospitals in 5 U.S</article-title>. <source>Reg 2018 to 2022. Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>e0235123</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.02351-23</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38018984</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lan</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>The efficacy and safety of eravacycline in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Med.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <page-range>866</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jcm8060866</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31212991</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>T. Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Hypervirulent and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A global public health threat</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>288</volume>, <fpage>127839</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2024.127839</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39141971</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mar&#xed;-Almirall</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cosgaya</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Higgins</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Van Assche</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Telli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huys</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>MALDI-TOF/MS identification of species from the Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) group revisited: inclusion of the novel A. seifertii and A. dijkshoorniae species</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Infect.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>210.e211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>210.e219</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmi.2016.11.020</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27919649</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>The efficacy and safety of eravacycline compared with current clinically common antibiotics in the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections: A Bayesian network meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Front. Med. (Laus)</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>935343</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmed.2022.935343</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36186801</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Morrissey</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Olesky</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hawser</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lob</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Karlowsky</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Corey</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title><italic>In vitro</italic> activity of eravacycline against gram-negative bacilli isolated in clinical laboratories worldwide from 2013 to 2017</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <elocation-id>e01699-19</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.01699-19</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31843999</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>P&#xf3;voa</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Coelho</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fernandes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mealha</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Moreira</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). 
<article-title>Pilot study evaluating C-reactive protein levels in the assessment of response to treatment of severe bloodstream infection</article-title>. <source>Clin. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>1855</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1857</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/430382</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15909277</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>P&#xf3;voa</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Martin-Loeches</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ramirez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bos</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Esperatti</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Silvestre</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Biomarkers kinetics in the assessment of ventilator-associated pneumonia response to antibiotics - results from the BioVAP study</article-title>. <source>J. Crit. Care</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>91</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.05.007</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28502892</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Scott</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Eravacycline: A review in complicated intra-abdominal infections</article-title>. <source>Drugs</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40265-019-01067-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30783960</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Scott</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jayakumar</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Viswesh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Efficacy of eravacycline versus best previously available therapy for adults with pneumonia due to difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) acinetobacter baumannii</article-title>. <source>Ann. Pharmacother.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>1299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1307</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/10600280221085551</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35511209</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Seifert</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stefanik</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sutcliffe</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Higgins</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title><italic>In-vitro</italic> activity of the novel fluorocycline eravacycline against carbapenem non-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>62</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.06.022</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28705668</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Barton</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Pharmacokinetic considerations and dosing strategies of antibiotics in the critically ill patient</article-title>. <source>J. Intensive Care Soc.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>153</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1751143714564816</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28979397</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Solomkin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Slepavicius</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marsh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Assessing the efficacy and safety of eravacycline vs ertapenem in complicated intra-abdominal infections in the investigating gram-negative infections treated with eravacycline (IGNITE 1) trial: A randomized clinical trial</article-title>. <source>JAMA Surg.</source> <volume>152</volume>, <fpage>224</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4237</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27851857</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Solomkin</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gardovskis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lawrence</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Montravers</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sway</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>IGNITE4: results of a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, prospective trial of eravacycline vs meropenem in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections</article-title>. <source>Clin. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>921</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>929</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/ciy1029</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30561562</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sutcliffe</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>O&#x2019;Brien</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fyfe</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Grossman</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Antibacterial activity of eravacycline (TP-434), a novel fluorocycline, against hospital and community pathogens</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>5548</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5558</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.01288-13</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23979750</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Nonclinical pharmacokinetics, protein binding, and elimination of KBP-7072, an aminomethylcycline antibiotic, in animal models</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <elocation-id>e00488-20</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.00488-20</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32229494</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Van Hise</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Petrak</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Skorodin</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fliegelman</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Didwania</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>A real-world assessment of clinical outcomes and safety of eravacycline: A novel fluorocycline</article-title>. <source>Infect. Dis. Ther.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1017</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1028</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40121-020-00351-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33063176</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhanel</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cheung</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Adam</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zelenitsky</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Golden</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Schweizer</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Review of eravacycline, a novel fluorocycline antibacterial agent</article-title>. <source>Drugs</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>588</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40265-016-0545-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26863149</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title><italic>In vitro</italic> activities of Eravacycline against 336 isolates collected from 2012 to 2016 from 11 teaching hospitals in China</article-title>. <source>BMC Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>508</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12879-019-4093-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31182038</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/24512">Dongsheng Zhou</ext-link>, Academy of Military Medical Science, China</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/414303">Carlos Henrique Camargo</ext-link>, Adolfo Lutz Institute, Brazil</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/486825">Laura Scrano</ext-link>, University of Basilicata, Italy</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>