AUTHOR=Wang Rong , Niu Bin , Zhang Chenming , Wang Yinghan , Zhang Xin , Tian Haiyan , Zhang Liaoyun 

TITLE=Machine learning-based prediction model for chronic brucellosis: a multi-feature approach using clinical and laboratory data

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

VOLUME=Volume 15 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2025.1700233

DOI=10.3389/fcimb.2025.1700233

ISSN=2235-2988

ABSTRACT=BackgroundChronic progression is a major clinical challenge in human brucellosis (HB), affecting nearly one-third of patients and leading to long-term disability. Reliable early prediction tools are lacking, hindering timely risk stratification and individualized management. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict chronic progression using routinely available clinical and laboratory data.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 555 patients with confirmed brucellosis admitted between 2019 and 2024. Clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators at admission were collected. Feature selection was performed using Boruta and recursive feature elimination. Six supervised ML models (random forest [RF], LightGBM, XGBoost, logistic regression [LR], multilayer perceptron [MLP], and support vector machine [SVM]) were constructed and evaluated by discrimination, calibration, clinical utility, and predictive metrics. Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and a web-based prediction tool was developed.ResultsOf 555 patients, 144 (25.9%) progressed to chronic brucellosis. Compared with the recovery group, chronic cases presented more frequently with arthralgia and arthritis and showed distinct biochemical profiles, including lower alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), triglycerides (TG), and higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), albumin (ALB), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and uric acid (UA). Among the six models, RF consistently demonstrated the most robust performance across metrics, achieving the highest AUC in the test set (0.782, 95% CI: 0.701 - 0.856), superior calibration (Emax = 0.155), and the greatest net clinical benefit in decision curve analysis. SHAP analysis identified TG, HDL-C, UA, eosinophil count, PA, ALT, BUN, and GLB as the most influential predictors, with biologically plausible associations.ConclusionUsing eight routinely available variables, the RF model demonstrated moderate discrimination with well-calibrated probability estimates but limited sensitivity. The tool may assist early risk stratification of chronic brucellosis when combined with clinical judgment; however, its predictive performance should be interpreted cautiously until validated in external, multicenter, and prospective studies.