Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2235-2988 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1662444 Review Lactate and lactylation in macrophage polarization of sepsis SunJian † Funding acquisition Writing – original draft ZhangMin † Writing – original draft ZhangLi Writing – original draft ZhangXinyue Writing – original draft ZhangJingxiao * ‡ Writing – review & editing Department of Emergency Critical Care Medicine, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China Correspondence: Jingxiao Zhang, zhangjingxiao@jlu.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work

ORCID: Jingxiao Zhang, orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-986X

 12 01 2026 2025 15 1662444 09 07 2025 17 12 2025 16 12 2025 Copyright © 2026 Sun, Zhang, Zhang, Zhang and Zhang. 2026 Sun, Zhang, Zhang, Zhang and Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Sepsis, which is characterized by potentially fatal multiple organ dysfunction, is caused by an abnormal host response to a major infection. During sepsis, the pathogen stimulates the host to activate resistance mechanisms that enhance immune cells’ oxygen consumption in inflammatory tissues and cells, and promote aerobic glycolysis. Lactate generated by aerobic glycolysis is an essential substrate for the tricarboxylic acid cycle and for post-translational modifications via histone lactylation and epigenetic regulation. It also serves as a signaling molecule that modulates macrophage polarization between pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotypes in response to inflammatory and metabolic signals in their local environment. The roles of lactate and lactylation modifications in cancer cell proliferation and invasion have been well studied and are now potential therapeutic targets for various malignancies. However, the roles of lactate and lactylation modification in sepsis remain unclear. This review focuses on lactate’s regulatory mechanism and lactylation modification during macrophage polarization in sepsis, and investigates whether this regulation could be a potential therapeutic target for sepsis.

 lactate lactylation macrophage polarization metabolic reprogramming sepsis The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This study was funded by the Department of Finance of Jilin Province (Award Numbers: 2024WSZX-D20, awarded to Jian Sun). section-at-acceptance Adaptive & Innate Immunity in Infection Introduction

Sepsis is a result of an aberrant host response to serious infection, characterized by life-threatening multiple organ dysfunction (Singer et al., 2016; Backer et al., 2024). It has been estimated that sepsis affects about 50 million people globally per annum and remains a major cause of death, increasing the global health burden (Fleischmann-Struzek et al., 2020; Rudd et al., 2020). The host initiates a vigorous anti-infection response to the pathogen in sepsis (Binnie et al., 2020). Resistance and tolerance mechanisms are two evolutionarily conserved defense systems that are essential for both efficient immune responses and host survival in sepsis (Willmann and Moita, 2024). While disease tolerance systems improve host fitness by reducing and repairing tissue damage (Martins et al., 2019) caused by both the pathogen and excessive inflammation without affecting pathogen load, resistance mechanisms attempt to lower the pathogen burden directly (Soares et al., 2017). Macrophages, as key mediators of immune activity in sepsis, demonstrate functional flexibility by switching between pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotypes based on the inflammatory and metabolic signals in their local environment. In addition to their antimicrobial roles in resistance mechanisms against infections, macrophages also maintain local and systemic homeostasis (Wculek et al., 2022), and their metabolic reprogramming plays a crucial part in developing disease tolerance (Ip et al., 2017).

Lactate serve as a significant biomarker for sepsis, exhibiting a favorable correlation with death and morbidity in cases of septic shock or sepsis (Mao et al., 2022; Schneider et al., 2022). It has been observed that during sepsis, lactate is produced by aerobic glycolysis or bacterial stimulation, which modulates macrophage polarization and the levels of certain genes via specific signaling pathways (Dichtl et al., 2021; Llibre et al., 2025). Moreover, lactate is present at the junction of oxidative and glycolytic metabolisms, serving as a vital energy intermediate. In 2014, Colegio et al. discovered that lactate can be absorbed by tumor-associated macrophages through the monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT1) in a melanoma model, subsequently directing macrophages towards a pro-tumorigenic phenotype (Colegio et al., 2014). Lactate has since been regarded as a significant substrate in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (Hui et al., 2017) and post-translational modifications (PTMs) through histone lactylation and epigenetic modulation (Zhang et al., 2019). It also functions as a signaling molecule that modulates both innate (Colegio et al., 2014) and adaptive immune responses, as required (Pucino et al., 2019). The roles of lactate and lactylation modification in cancer cell proliferation and invasion have been well studied and become potential therapeutic targets for various malignancies (Colegio et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2019). However, the roles of lactate and lactylation modification in sepsis remain unclear, this review focuses on lactate’s regulatory mechanism and lactylation modification in macrophage polarization during sepsis, and investigates whether the regulation would be a potential therapy target for sepsis.

 Metabolic reprogramming of macrophages in sepsis

According to historical descriptions, sepsis progresses in two stages: an initial hyperinflammatory stage caused by an acute burst of pro-inflammatory mediators and metabolic deviation in response to injury or infection, and a later immunosuppressive stage distinguished by counter-regulatory mechanisms to limit and control the inflammatory process, facilitate repair mechanisms, and return to basal homeostasis (Van Wyngene et al., 2018; Willmann and Moita, 2024). Macrophages are very flexible and can polarize into several phenotypes in response to stimuli (Yu et al., 2017). LPS-stimulated macrophages, commonly referred to as M1, exhibit a decrease in oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and an increase in aerobic glycolysis (also known as the Warburg effect). Glycolysis is up-regulated, which aids macrophages in fully developing their pro-inflammatory phenotype (Semba et al., 2016; Lauterbach et al., 2019). On the other hand, macrophages treated with interleukin-4 (IL-4), also known as M2, display alternative activation markers, such as arginase 1 (Arg1), resistin-like molecule α (RELM-α), and PD-1 ligand 2 (PD-L2), and up-regulate OXPHOS (Huang et al., 2016).

M1 macrophages show decreased OXPHOS through the TCA cycle, higher glucose absorption, an increased rate of glycolysis, and an up-regulated pentose phosphate pathway during the early stages of sepsis (Tannahill et al., 2013). This metabolic shift in highly glycolytic, activated “M1” macrophages has led to increased levels of the TCA cycle intermediate succinate, which has been shown to enhance the signal that stabilizes hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) (Figure 1) (Koivunen et al., 2007; Tannahill et al., 2013). This process occurs when extra succinate is transferred from the mitochondria into the cytosol, where it might hinder the activity of the prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD), stabilizing and activating HIF-1α. The proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β and other HIF-dependent genes, such as those encoding glycolysis-related enzymes, are subsequently positively regulated by HIF-1α (Tannahill et al., 2013).

The pathway through which lactate induces M2 macrophage phenotype in sepsis. (A) Lactate increases the levels of VEGF and Arg-1 by stabilizing/activating HIF-1α. (B) Extracellular lactate promotes acidic TME, which activates proton-sensing GPR65/GPR132, mediating the expression of M2-like genes through the cAMP-ICER pathway. (C) Lactate activates the mTOR-AKT pathway, which modulates TAM to a proinvasive M2-like phenotype. (D) Lactate stimulates the ERK-STAT3 pathway through ERK phosphorylation, which then promotes pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory M2-like phenotypes. (E) Lactate induces histone lactylation at the H3K18 promoter site of VEGF, Arg-1, and various M2-like genes in TAM to increase their levels, thus mediating an M2-like phenotype in TAM. (F) TLR can activate PI3K-AKT, which promotes the transformation of macrophages into an anti-inflammatory repair phenotype via the PI3K-AKT-GSK3b-FOXO1 pathway. TME tumor mircro environment, mTOR mammalian target of rapamycin, GPR81 G-protein-coupled receptor 81, TLR4 toll-like receptor 4, HIF-1α hypoxia inducible factor-1α.

Diagram depicting cellular processes in sepsis, contrasting M1 pro-inflammatory and M2 anti-inflammatory pathways. It shows interactions between lactate and glycolysis, with signaling molecules like TORC, AKT, and STAT3 influencing gene expression. The image includes cellular components such as histones and pathways involving ILR, ATP, HIF-1 alpha, CRP, impacting inflammatory responses.

Following the acute inflammatory phase of sepsis, the body uses a variety of counter-regulatory mechanisms to limit the inflammatory process, facilitate repair, and return to basal homeostasis as tissue damage increases, immune cells undergo metabolic reprogramming, the inflammatory microenvironment changes, and metabolic byproducts accumulate (Willmann and Moita, 2024). The establishment of disease tolerance is dependent mainly on macrophage metabolic reprogramming, potentially mediated by IL-10 (Ip et al., 2017). This cytokine inhibits glycolysis and glucose absorption while promoting OXPHOS. Furthermore, IL-10 stimulates the expression of DNA damage inducible transcript 4 (DDIT4), which inhibits the activity of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). This results in the mitophagy of malfunctioning mitochondria, which lowers ROS levels, inhibits NOD-like receptor thermal protein domain-associated protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation, and reduces IL-1 production, all of which can harm cells and tissues (Ip et al., 2017).

 The influence of lactate-related signaling pathways on macrophage polarization in sepsis Lactate changes in sepsis

Lactate is one of the primary metabolites of glycolysis in sepsis and plays a significant role in resistance and tolerance mechanisms (Willmann and Moita, 2024). Serum lactate levels serve as a significant biomarker for sepsis (Mao et al., 2022; Schneider et al., 2022). It is becoming increasingly clear that not only accelerated aerobic glycolysis flux but also reduced hepatic clearance contribute to hyperlactatemia (Suetrong and Walley, 2016). However, 24–72 hours post-tissue injury, they transition to anti-inflammatory phenotypes, enhancing mitochondrial metabolic pathways and suppressing glycolytic genes, facilitating tissue repair and restoring homeostasis (Varga et al., 2016). Furthermore, studies on immune metabolism have indicated that aerobic glycolysis induced immune cell activation and lactate generation may promote an immunosuppression of the local inflammation and innate immunity (Nolt et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2022). These metabolic changes have profound implications for immune control and organ function, modulating the pathogenesis of sepsis.

Relative to other immune modulatory metabolites, like itaconate, fumarate, and succinate, lactate’s signaling pathways and sensing are evolutionarily markedly developed (Zasłona and O’Neill, 2020). Lactate acts as an essential glycolytic precursor, a major source of energy for mitochondrial respiration, and a signaling molecule, by shuttling between inter- and intra-cellular compartments (Brooks, 2020). Its complex network comprises 2 transporter families: monocarboxylate transporter 1(MCT1), MCT4 (Felmlee et al., 2020) and 2 sodium-coupled MCTs (SLC5A8 and SLC5A12) (Ganapathy et al., 2008) as well as membrane receptors, G-protein-coupled receptor 81 (GPR81) and GPR132 (Chen et al., 2017; Khatib-Massalha et al., 2020). MCT1 and MCT4 have been comprehensively researched. MCT1 is markedly found in multiple tissues and facilitates the uptake of lactate, whereas MCT4 is primarily present in tissues with excess glycolysis and promotes lactate outflow (Sun et al., 2017; Ye et al., 2022). Each lactate molecule produced releases one proton (H+), proton and lactate concentration gradients, however, determine the direction of in vivo MCT-mediated lactate transport. Lactate shuttling is facilitated by a variety of bodily systems and compartments, including the interstitial space, circulation, and vasculature (Tasdogan et al., 2020).

 The impact of lactate on macrophage polarization in sepsis

The literature suggests that lactate modulates macrophage metabolic reprogramming in inflammation, cancer, and pulmonary fibrosis (Cui et al., 2021; Wang N. et al., 2022). Furthermore, it inhibits pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages and promotes pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. These effects are facilitated by multiple processes, including histone PTM and signaling pathway changes (Ivashkiv, 2020): (1) pyruvate metabolizes lactate through lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which in turn results in the stabilization of HIF-1α by inhibiting prolyl hydroxylase. HIF-1α increases tumor-associated macrophages’ vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)and Arg-1 levels via a mechanism independent of IL-4/IL-13, inducing the M2 phenotype. HIF-1α, however, does not raise the levels of Arg-1 or VEGF during M1 polarization, as it is expressed early and induces the transcription of glycolytic genes, rather than Arg-1 and VEGF (Colegio et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2019) (Figure 1A). (2) Lactate increases immunological tolerance by activating the mTOR, which subsequently reduces HIF-1α’s lysosomal degradation, thus enhancing macrophage anti-inflammatory responses (Liu et al., 2023) (Figure 1C). (3) In macrophages, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) recognition by toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) stimulates nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kB), which mediates pro-inflammatory molecules and elevates lactate production by increasing aerobic glycolysis (Zanoni et al., 2011; Fitzgerald and Kagan, 2020). Irizarry-Caro RA et al. showed that B-cell adapter for PI3K (BCAP) is a novel TLR signaling adapter, which modulates macrophage differentiation into an M2 repair phenotype (Troutman et al., 2012). TLR stimulates PI3K-AKT through BCAP, and active AKT induces M2 transition of macrophage phenotype via the PI3K-AKT-GSK3b-FOXO1 pathway. Furthermore, AKT phosphorylation suppresses GSK3b and FOXO1, its downstream targets, alleviating inflammation. The accumulation of lactate promotes histone lactylation, which increases wound repair gene levels (Figure 1F). These data suggest that BCAP has an essential switch-like role in the M2 repair phenotype differentiation of macrophages and serves as a potential pharmacological target for treating disorders associated with the excessive activation of the macrophage proinflammatory phenotype (Irizarry-Caro et al., 2020). Lactate suppresses NLRP2 and TLR4 signaling during inflammation, disrupting the NF-κB-IL-1β-Casp1 axis through GPR81 and arrestin β 2 (ARRB2) (Hoque et al., 2014). The expression of lactate is markedly high in the brain, which alters during pathological conditions. In microglia, lactate can promote pro-inflammatory (Andersson et al., 2005) and anti-inflammatory (Zhang et al., 2023) effects, as well as increased (Liu et al., 2020) and decreased (Nicola et al., 2022) phagocytic capacity, potentially via GPR81 but not MCT1 (Nicola et al., 2022). (4) GPR132 and GPR65 are primarily found on macrophage surfaces and are stimulated by the acidic TME derived from extracellular conditions. Moreover, they induce an intracellular signaling cascade, stimulating the production of pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory genes in macrophages through the cAMP-ICER pathway, thus facilitating M2 phenotype differentiation of macrophages (Chen et al., 2017; Bohn et al., 2018) (Figure 1B).

 The impact of ketone bodies on macrophage polarization in sepsis

Lactate and pyruvate, the byproducts of glycolysis, offer negative feedback inhibition of glucose elimination (Brooks, 2020). In particular, the ketone body β-hydroxybutyrate may inhibit histone deacetylase activity (Chisolm and Weinmann, 2018), with clear health consequences, particularly for people who are malnourished or fasting, who eat high-fat, ketogenic diets, or who have severe insulin insufficiency and are at risk for ketoacidosis. It is anticipated that β-hydroxybutylation of histones will neutralize the positive charge on lysine residues, creating a more open chromatin for gene transcription, much as histone acetylation (Xie et al., 2016). The discovery that β-hydroxybutyrate can suppress histone deacetylase activity remains debated (Bendridi et al., 2022). Lactate can also inhibit histone deacetylases activity (Latham et al., 2012), potentially altering gene expression and raising interesting considerations about the potential effects of acute or chronic hyperlactatemia on epigenetics. Acetyl-CoA and Malonyl-CoA are produced from lactate, which is also the primary mitochondrial substrate. Malonyl-CoA prevents the absorption of derivatives of free fatty acids (FFAs) in the mitochondria through carnitine palmitoyltransferase1 (CPT1), whereas acetyl-CoA inhibits β-ketothiolase and therefore β-oxidation (Abo Alrob and Lopaschuk, 2014). Lactate has significant effects on energy substrate partitioning via mass action, cell redox control, allosteric binding, and chromatin reprogramming via histone lactylation (Brooks, 2020). Further, the injection of ketone bodies (KBs) decreases lactate formation and glycolysis (Cox et al., 2016). Like the treatment in PDH complex deficiency child, whether ketogenic diets or supplementation with KBs will improve fat oxidation and decrease lactate production in septic subjects requires further investigation. In addition, KBs can prevent oxidative stress and the NLRP3 inflammasome in inflammatory illness models (Shimazu et al., 2013), and subcutaneous KBs delivery guards against peripheral and neuroinflammation in sepsis (Ryan and O’Neill, 2020).

 The influence of lactylation-related signaling pathways on macrophage polarization in sepsis

During sepsis, under the combined influence of various factors, such as pathogens, tissue damage, an inflammatory microenvironment, and metabolic products, macrophages promote a new balance between tolerance and resistance mechanisms in the body through metabolic reprogramming (Martins et al., 2019; Willmann and Moita, 2024).

Since its discovery in 2019 as a novel epigenetic modification at lysine residues, histone lysine lactylation (Kla) has gained recognition for its crucial function in connecting the cellular metabolite lactate to epigenetic regulation. Histone Kla is biochemically attached to lysine residues through the incorporation of a lactyl group (Zhang et al., 2019). The majority of the discovered histone Kla sites, H3K18la, H3K27la, H3K14la, H3K9la, H3K56la, and H4K12la, are found on H3 and H4 (Wang et al., 2024). Like other acylation modifications, histone Kla activates gene expression and is involved in cellular metabolism, inflammatory responses, and embryonic development. Zhang et al. revealed that LPS-mediated M1 macrophages elevated lactate levels by glycolysis and increased histone lactylation, increasing the levels of Arg1 and other wound healing-related genes, suggesting a phenotypic shift to M2 immunosuppressive macrophages (Zhang et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2020), promotes the tolerance mechanism to pathogens in diseases. They identified a modulatory mechanism in which both endogenous and exogenous lactate, resulting from aerobic glycolysis and MCT in M1 macrophages, respectively, were converted to lactoyl coenzyme A, which subsequently attaches a lactoyl moiety to histone lysine tails in the presence of p53 and acetyltransferase p300 (Zhang et al., 2019; Varner et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2022). Then, it was identified that aerobic glycolysis induces lactate accumulation in M1 macrophages, which results in pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2)’s lactylation modification at K62, activating the tetrameric form of PKM2 and decreasing dimerization and nuclear translocation. This suppressed the macrophage Warburg effect, reduced lactate generation, and increased the M1 to M2 macrophage transition, which is called “the PKM2 paradox in the Warburg effect” (Dichtl et al., 2021; Wang J. et al., 2022). This pathway reduced the levels of M1 phenotypic genes in macrophages via the HIF-1α/PKM2 axis, promoting M2 features and mitigating the LPS-induced M1 phenotype (Palsson-McDermott et al., 2015; Wiese et al., 2021). Lactate enhances M2 macrophage polarization through HIF-1α signaling and induces histone lactylation, facilitating immune homeostasis (Zhang et al., 2019; Zhang and Li, 2020). In sepsis, it modulates the levels of inflammatory cytokines, increases the levels of Arg1, and induces macrophages’ anti-inflammatory function. Arg1 overexpression is associated with a macrophage-resolving phenotype (Chu et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2024). Ma XM et al. studied the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy and indicated that although lactate can promote H3K12 and H4K18 lactylation in macrophages, it primarily directed the inflammatory response in macrophages and stimulated HIF-1α and inflammatory factors, including IL-1β, through H4K12 lactylation in conditions with high levels of free fatty acids (Ma et al., 2024). Lactyl-CoA is a key precursor in both histone and non-histone lactylation processes. The activity of CoA transferases that catalyze the synthesis of lactyl-CoA from lactate is strongly influenced by pH levels (Liao et al., 2025). Recent studies have identified alanyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS1/2) as unique enzymes that sense intracellular lactate and convert it into lactyl-CoA in an ATP-dependent manner to catalyze histone lactylation. This positioning makes lactylation a direct readout of metabolic changes, dynamically modifying lysine residues on histones to regulate gene expression during hypoxia or inflammation (Li et al., 2024). Lactylation is thus expected to influence the balance between tolerance and resistance in tissues by impacting macrophages’ metabolic reprogramming. Non-histone lactylation modification is also crucially involved in macrophage phenotype differentiation. Lactylation of lysine on histones exhibits slower (24 h) kinetics than does acetylation (6 h) in lung (Chen et al., 2021). Non-histone protein Kla affects protein levels and functions more directly by altering their stability, activity, or localization, whereas histone Kla affects gene accessibility and transcription (Zhang et al., 2025). To reestablish a new balance in Sepsis, histone and non-histone lactylation, along with other protein post-translational modifications, work together in metabolic reprogramming.

 Role of other PTMs in sepsis-associated macrophage polarization

Among these post-translational modifications (PTMs), methylation, acetylation, and lactylation are important regulatory mechanisms governing macrophage polarization during sepsis. By comparing these common PTMs with lactylation, we can further clarify the role of lactylation in therapeutic strategies for sepsis.

Methylation and lactylation

Methylation refers to the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to lysine or arginine residues on proteins. This modification mainly occurs at specific sites on histones—H3K4, H3K9, H3K27, H3K36, and H3K79—with H3K9 being a notable competitive site for lactylation (Zhang and Li, 2020). Lactylation reflects the acute metabolic state of the cell, depends on lactyl-CoA, and can be reversed by deacetylases such as histone deacetylase (HDAC)1–3 and CobB (Chu et al., 2022). Methylation generally establishes stable and long-lasting epigenetic marks, whereas lactylation is highly dynamic and responsive to rapid metabolic fluctuations during inflammation (Wang J. et al., 2022).

Competition between methylation and lactylation at lysine residues (such as H3K9 or H3K18) forms a complex regulatory mechanism. This interplay allows lactylation to counteract repressive methyl marks during the resolution phase of inflammation, particularly as macrophages shift from a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Functionally, this metabolism-epigenetics crosstalk enables lactylation to modulate inflammatory responses. In macrophages, H3K18la promotes anti-inflammatory gene expression and may counterbalance the inhibitory effects of methylation on adjacent residues (Chen et al., 2024). In addition, lactate—the substrate for lactylation—can indirectly affect the availability of SAM, partly through mechanisms involving hypoxia-inducible factors, thereby influencing methylation patterns (Ma et al., 2024).

 Acetylation, lactylation, and phosphorylation

The interaction between phosphorylation and lactylation is particularly important in metabolic regulation and sepsis. Phosphorylation indirectly affects lactylation by regulating glycolytic flux and lactate production. Phosphorylation of enzymes such as pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) promotes lactate accumulation, a hallmark of the Warburg effect (Wu et al., 2024). Elevated lactate levels subsequently drive histone lactylation, linking phosphorylation and lactylation dynamically. This mechanism highlights how PTMs are interconnected and co-regulated. Acetylation refers to the addition of an acetyl group to lysine residues on proteins, a process catalyzed by acetyltransferases (HATs/KATs) and reversed by histones deacetylases (Gil et al., 2017). It commonly occurs at multiple sites on histones, such as H3K9, K14, K18, and K23 (Arnaudo and Garcia, 2013), many of which are also frequent targets of lactylation.

Acetylation involves the addition of an acetyl group and is derived from acetyl-CoA, a common metabolite produced through OXPHOS of carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins. Lactylation, on the other hand, is mainly facilitated by lactate generated during aerobic glycolysis. Lactylation specifically adds lactyl groups derived from lactate, a byproduct of glycolysis, making it a direct indicator of cellular metabolic states, particularly under hypoxic or inflammatory conditions. This direct metabolic sensitivity positions lactylation as a key sensor of glycolytic flux. The accumulation of acetyl-CoA due to OXPHOS and acetylation, or the accumulation of lactate due to enhanced glycolysis and lactylation, has a strong regulatory effect on macrophage polarization. At the epigenetic intersection of lactylation and acetylation, the PDH complex catalyzes the irreversible oxidation of pyruvate generated by glycolysis to acetyl-CoA, priming the TCA cycle, initiating mitochondrial OXPHOS, and eventually driving ATP generation (Stacpoole and McCall, 2023). Several small compounds control PDH complex post-transcriptionally, primarily through reversible phosphorylation. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) overexpression phosphorylates serine residues on the E1α subunit, rendering the complex inactive under anaerobic or inflammatory circumstances. This shifts carbohydrate metabolism away from OXPHOS and toward cytoplasmic pyruvate degradation to lactate, increasing glycolysis and facilitating the removal of pathogens. Two isoforms of pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase (PDP) 1 and 2dephosphorylate E1α and restore catalytic activity in aerobic environments. The PTM of histones may also be facilitated by acetyl-CoA, which is produced by glycolysis and other processes. The acetylation of histone lysine residues is a significant form of PTM-mediated epigenetic control. Gene transcription is made possible by the acetylation of conserved lysine residues on chromatin, which opens up the chromatin structure (Bannister and Kouzarides, 2011). In summary, acetylation neutralizes the positive charge on lysine residues, weakening electrostatic interactions between DNA and histones to create a more open chromatin structure amenable to transcription and providing a critical metabolic signal for cell growth and proliferation, promoted tolerance mechanisms and injury repair in sepsis (Lee et al., 2014). Lactylation can promote the shift of macrophages from the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype by enhancing anti-inflammatory responses, thereby increasing tolerance mechanisms during sepsis (Liu et al., 2019). When oxidative phosphorylation predominates, acetylation serves as the major form of protein modification, whereas lactylation becomes the dominant modification during anaerobic glycolysis. As interconnected yet functionally distinct regulators of cellular physiology, acetylation broadly fine-tunes cellular functions, while lactylation acts as a rapid and dynamic sensor of metabolic flux. However, the interactions between these two modifications remain unclear and require further investigation (Table 1).

Major histone modifications and their pathophysiological effects in sepsis.

Histone modification Mechanism Target genes/pathways Pathophysiological effect Ref
H3K27me3 Catalyzed by EZH2; repressive mark Sox9, IL-12 promoter Suppresses gene expression; associated with immune cell dysfunction, AKI and reduced IL-12 in dendritic cells (Li et al., 2023)
H3K4me3 Activating mark at gene promoters NF-κB target genes Enhances transcription of inflammatory genes; its loss linked to long-term immune suppression post-sepsis (Davis et al., 2019)
H3K18la Addition of lactyl group from lactate via p300 EGR1, RhoA Promotes transcription of genes involved in repair and inflammation; associated with ALI, AKI, and immunosuppression (Zhang et al., 2019; Chu et al., 2022; Qiao et al., 2024; Lu et al., 2025)
H3K27ac H3K4me1 Enhancers are involved in cytokine response and NF-κB signaling NF-κB signaling, LPS can induce the accumulation of histone H3K27ac and H3K4me1, but the accumulation of H3K27ac precedes that of H3K4me1. (Novakovic et al., 2016)
Deacetylation Removes acetyl groups; represses gene transcription TNF, IL-1β Promotes immunosuppression; HDAC1/2 modulates TLR responses and contributes to endotoxin tolerance (Urdinguio et al., 2019)

EZH2, enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit; Sox9, SRY-Box Transcription Factor 9; AKI, acute kidney injury; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; HATs, histone acetyltransferases; Foxp3, forkhead box P3; EGR1, early growth response protein 1; ALI, acute lung injury; NET, neutrophil extracellular trap; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; HDAC1/2, histone deacetylase 1/2; TLR, toll-like receptor.

 Therapeutic frontiers in the regulation of lactate and lactylation in sepsis

Histone Kla, MCT, and LDH are the primary targets in the control of lactate and lactylation (Figure 2). The last stage of glycolysis, which converts pyruvate to lactate, is catalyzed by LDH, which is widely distributed throughout the body’s tissues and organs. Irrespective of the increased rate of glycolysis and the decreased rate of selected substantial pyruvate-malate-dependent oxygen consumption, energy metabolism problems arise during Sepsis. Serum LDH levels are significantly elevated in sepsis patients due to the previously described reasons (Yu et al., 2024). LDH adopts a bilobal shape with two domains: a smaller domain devoted to the substrate pyruvate and a larger Rossmann domain that binds the cofactor NADH. Based on their mechanism of action, the LDH inhibitors identified to date can be divided into several categories. Among them are dual (substrate and cofactor) competitive inhibitors, cofactor (NADH) competitive inhibitors, and substrate (pyruvate) competitive inhibitors (Rai et al., 2017; Sharma et al., 2022). According to recent studies, oxamate, (R)-GNE-140, and fargesin are the medications that impact histone Kla. An inactive enzyme complex is created when oxamate and pyruvate compete for binding to LDH. It has been demonstrated that this association inhibits LDH activity, which in turn affects histone Kla levels, particularly H3K18la (Sun et al., 2023). This inhibition may improve the effectiveness of CAR-T-cell therapy. Histone Kla levels were considerably decreased by treatment with 10 μM (R)-GNE-140 (Dai et al., 2023). Similarly, fargesin’s potential as a therapeutic approach is demonstrated by its inhibition of LDH expression, thereby lowering H3Kla levels in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Guo et al., 2024).

During glycolytic metabolism in macrophages, the first rate-limiting enzyme is HK, which catalyzes the conversion of glucose into G-6-P. The primary rate-limiting step of glycolysis is the PFK1-catalyzed conversion of F-6-P to F-1,6-BP. PFKFB catalyzes F-6-P transformation into F-2,6-BP, the most potent PFK1 activator. Another rate-limiting enzyme, PK, converts PEP to pyruvate. PKM2, an isoform of PK, promotes both macrophage inflammatory responses and aerobic glycolysis. PDK1 is an essential regulator of glucose metabolism that is responsible for the inactivation of PDH through the process of phosphorylation, hence inhibiting the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA and promoting lactate generation via glycolysis. HK2, hexokinase 2; PK, pyruvate kinase; PKM2, pyruvate kinase M2; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; G-6-P, Glucose-6-phosphat; F-6-P, fructose 6-phosphate; F-1,6-P, 1,6-fructose diphosphate; PFK1, Phosphofructokinase-1; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; PDK, Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

Flowchart illustrating glucose metabolism. Glucose is converted to G-6-P by HK, then to F-6-P. PFK1 activates conversion to F-1,6-BP, then to PEP and pyruvate by PK. Pyruvate converts aerobically to acetyl-CoA, entering TCA cycle, or anaerobically to lactate by LDH. Hypoxia increases HIF-1α, stimulating PDK, reducing PDH, affecting acetyl-CoA. Inhibitors: 2-DG affects HK, dichloroacetic affects PDK, shikonin affects PK, oxamate affects LDH. F-2,6-BP activates PFK1.

MCT1 and MCT4 are essential for improving lactate shuttling. The most powerful MCT inhibitors share comparable structural features. Among the inhibitors, the pyrrolidine derivative AZD3965 is distinguished by its strong inhibition of MCT1 and high affinity (Wang et al., 2021). In melanoma cells, AZD3965 enhances lactate levels and prevents lactate export (Tasdogan et al., 2020). Following treatment of mouse myoblast C2C12 cells with AZD3965, histone Kla levels are significantly increased (Dai et al., 2023).

Histone Kla is the target of the experimentally verified inhibitor C646 (Bowers et al., 2010). In myoblasts treated with lactate, this molecule has been shown to decrease H3K9la expression (Dai et al., 2023) substantially. However, C646’s effectiveness and specificity still need improvement. According to recent studies, elevated histone Kla accelerates disease progression, making eraser activators viable treatment options. Meanwhile, subsequent research may find that the disease is affected by lower levels of histone Kla, necessitating investigation of related inhibitors. Targeting lactylation-modifying enzymes, such as p300/CBP, histone deacetylases, and sirtuins (deacetylases), can alter the extent (Ciarlo et al., 2013; Moreno-Yruela et al., 2022). Controlling these enzymes can affect the lactylation balance, improving the inflammatory state and immunological response in sepsis patients. To clarify the upstream and downstream regulatory mechanisms of these lactylation enzymes, further research is needed.

2-Deoxy-D-glucose(2-DG), and oxamate (Maio et al., 2024), have demonstrated potential in mitigating systemic inflammation in sepsis models, underscoring their prospective therapeutic uses (Tan et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2022). In sepsis, these inhibitors reduce glycolysis rate, decreasing intracellular lactate, which suppresses the inflammatory reactions and tissue damage by inducing autophagy via the lactate/SIRT3/AMPK pathway (Zhong et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2021; Dai et al., 2022). Therefore, knocking down hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, pyruvate kinase isoenzymes M2, and Gly-related genes (Ding et al., 2021; Cai et al., 2022) can modulate lactate production via glycolytic pathways, and is a promising treatment approach for sepsis (Chen et al., 2021). Shikonin is a PKM2 inhibitor, which can reduce lactate generation, high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) release, and septic mouse mortality in Adenosine 5’-monophosphate-activated protein kinase-deficient mice (Yang et al., 2014; Leite-Avalca et al., 2019).

 Conclusion

Lactate is an essential energy intermediate found at the junction of oxidative and glycolytic metabolism. During sepsis, hypoxia and bacterial infection promoted anaerobic glycolysis, increased lactate levels and lactylation (Suetrong and Walley, 2016). Macrophages, as key regulators of immune responses with significant adaptability, undergo dynamic phenotypic alterations to accommodate changes in inflammatory and metabolic cues. Lactate restricts the over-inflammation of M1 macrophages through negative feedback by regulating histone or non-histone lactylation to promote the tolerance mechanisms in sepsis. Therefore, it was inferred that macrophage inhibition by targeting glycolysis, modulating lactylation, and identifying new lactylation sites are potential therapeutic avenues to improve sepsis prognosis. These approaches will provide novel perspectives and methods for treating sepsis by modulating immune cells’ metabolic state and inflammatory response. However, to ensure the clinical efficacy and safety of these treatment avenues, further validation is required. Moreover, lactyl-histones are considered potential bio-indices for sepsis prognosis and diagnosis (Bo et al., 2021). These strategies may become integral to sepsis treatment in the future, providing a wide range of therapeutic options for patients.

 Author contributions

JS: Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. MZ: Writing – original draft. LZ: Writing – original draft. XZ: Writing – original draft. JZ: Writing – review & editing.

 Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the reviewers who participated in the review and MJEditor (www.mjeditor.com) for their linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

 Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

 Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

 References Abo Alrob O. Lopaschuk G. D. (2014). Role of CoA and acetyl-CoA in regulating cardiac fatty acid and glucose oxidation. Biochem. Soc Trans. 42, 1043–1051. doi: 10.1042/BST20140094, PMID: 25110000 Andersson A. K. Rönnbäck L. Hansson E. (2005). Lactate induces tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6 and interleukin-1β release in microglial- and astroglial-enriched primary cultures. J. Neurochem. 93, 1327–1333. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03132.x, PMID: 15934951 Arnaudo A. M. Garcia B. A. (2013). Proteomic characterization of novel histone post-translational modifications. Epigenet. Chromatin 6, 24. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-6-24, PMID: 23916056 Bannister A. J. Kouzarides T. (2011). Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 21, 381–395. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.22, PMID: 21321607 Bendridi N. Selmi A. Balcerczyk A. Pirola L. (2022). Ketone bodies as metabolites and signalling molecules at the crossroad between inflammation and epigenetic control of cardiometabolic disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 14564. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314564, PMID: 36498891 Binnie A. Tsang J. L. Y. Hu P. Carrasqueiro G. Castelo-Branco P. dos Santos C. C. (2020). Epigenetics of sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 48, 745–756. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004247, PMID: 32167492 Bo F. Shendong L. Zongshuai W. Fang C. Zheng W. Chunhua G. . (2021). Global analysis of lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation in wheat root. Sci. Rep. 11, 6327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85879-y, PMID: 33737719 Bohn T. Rapp S. Luther N. Klein M. Bruehl T.-J. Kojima N. . (2018). Tumor immunoevasion via acidosis-dependent induction of regulatory tumor-associated macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 19, 1319–1329. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0226-8, PMID: 30397348 Bowers E. M. Yan G. Mukherjee C. Orry A. Wang L. Holbert M. A. . (2010). Virtual ligand screening of the p300/CBP histone acetyltransferase: identification of a selective small molecule inhibitor. Chem. Biol. 17, 471–482. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.03.006, PMID: 20534345 Brooks G. A. (2020). Lactate as a fulcrum of metabolism. Redox Biol. 35, 101454. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101454, PMID: 32113910 Cai W. Xu D. Zeng C. Liao F. Li R. Lin Y. . (2022). Modulating lysine crotonylation in cardiomyocytes improves myocardial outcomes. Circ. Res. 131, 456–472. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321054, PMID: 35920168 Chen P. Zuo H. Xiong H. Kolar M. J. Chu Q. Saghatelian A. . (2017). Gpr132 sensing of lactate mediates tumor–macrophage interplay to promote breast cancer metastasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 580–585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614035114, PMID: 28049847 Chen A.-N. Luo Y. Yang Y.-H. Fu J.-T. Geng X.-M. Shi J.-P. . (2021). Lactylation, a novel metabolic reprogramming code: current status and prospects. Front. Immunol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.688910, PMID: 34177945 Chen Y. Wu J. Zhai L. Zhang T. Yin H. Gao H. . (2024). Metabolic regulation of homologous recombination repair by MRE11 lactylation. Cell 187, 294–311.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.022, PMID: 38128537 Chisolm D. A. Weinmann A. S. (2018). Connections between metabolism and epigenetics in programming cellular differentiation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 36, 221–246. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053127, PMID: 29328786 Chu X. Di C. Chang P. Li L. Feng Z. Xiao S. . (2022). Lactylated histone H3K18 as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and predicting the severity of septic shock. Front. Immunol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.786666, PMID: 35069560 Ciarlo E. Savva A. Roger T. (2013). Epigenetics in sepsis: targeting histone deacetylases. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 42, S8–S12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.04.004, PMID: 23664675 Colegio O. R. Chu N.-Q. Szabo A. L. Chu T. Rhebergen A. M. Jairam V. . (2014). Functional polarization of tumour-associated macrophages by tumour-derived lactic acid. Nature 513, 559–563. doi: 10.1038/nature13490, PMID: 25043024 Cox P. J. Kirk T. Ashmore T. Willerton K. Evans R. Smith A. . (2016). Nutritional ketosis alters fuel preference and thereby endurance performance in athletes. Cell Metab. 24, 256–268. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.07.010, PMID: 27475046 Cui H. Xie N. Banerjee S. Ge J. Jiang D. Dey T. . (2021). Lung myofibroblasts promote macrophage profibrotic activity through lactate-induced histone lactylation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 64, 115–125. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2020-0360OC, PMID: 33074715 De Backer D. Deutschman C. S. Hellman J. Myatra S. N. Ostermann M. Prescott H. C. . (2024). Surviving sepsis campaign research priorities 2023. Crit. Care Med. 52, 268–296. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006135, PMID: 38240508 Dai W. Wu G. Liu K. Chen Q. Tao J. Liu H. . (2023). Lactate promotes myogenesis via activating H3K9 lactylation-dependent up-regulation of Neu2 expression. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 14, 2851–2865. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13363, PMID: 37919243 Dai X. Lv X. Thompson E. W. Ostrikov K.(. (2022). Histone lactylation: epigenetic mark of glycolytic switch. Trends Genet. 38, 124–127. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.09.009, PMID: 34627643 Davis F. M. Schaller M. A. Dendekker A. Joshi A. D. Kimball A. S. Evanoff H. . (2019). Sepsis induces prolonged epigenetic modifications in bone marrow and peripheral macrophages impairing inflammation and wound healing. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 39, 2353–2366. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312754, PMID: 31644352 Dichtl S. Lindenthal L. Zeitler L. Behnke K. Schlösser D. Strobl B. . (2021). Lactate and IL6 define separable paths of inflammatory metabolic adaptation. Sci. Adv. 7. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg3505, PMID: 34162546 Ding H. Wang J. Zhang X.-Y. Yin L. Feng T. (2021). Lycium barbarum polysaccharide antagonizes LPS-induced inflammation by altering the glycolysis and differentiation of macrophages by triggering the degradation of PKM2. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 44, 379–388. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b20-00752, PMID: 33390389 Felmlee M. A. Jones R. S. Rodriguez-Cruz V. Follman K. E. Morris M. E. (2020). Monocarboxylate transporters (SLC16): function, regulation, and role in health and disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 72, 466–485. doi: 10.1124/pr.119.018762, PMID: 32144120 Fitzgerald K. A. Kagan J. C. (2020). Toll-like receptors and the control of immunity. Cell 180, 1044–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.041, PMID: 32164908 Fleischmann-Struzek C. Mellhammar L. Rose N. Cassini A. Rudd K. E. Schlattmann P. . (2020). Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 46, 1552–1562. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x, PMID: 32572531 Ganapathy V. Thangaraju M. Gopal E. Martin P. M. Itagaki S. Miyauchi S. . (2008). Sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporters in normal tissues and in cancer. AAPS J. 10, 193. doi: 10.1208/s12248-008-9022-y, PMID: 18446519 Gil J. Ramírez-Torres A. Encarnación-Guevara S. (2017). Lysine acetylation and cancer: A proteomics perspective. J. Proteomics 150, 297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.10.003, PMID: 27746255 Guo Z. Tang Y. Wang S. Huang Y. Chi Q. Xu K. . (2024). Natural product fargesin interferes with H3 histone lactylation via targeting PKM2 to inhibit non-small cell lung cancer tumorigenesis. BioFactors 50, 592–607. doi: 10.1002/biof.2031, PMID: 38149461 Hoque R. Farooq A. Ghani A. Gorelick F. Mehal W. Z. (2014). Lactate reduces liver and pancreatic injury in toll-like receptor– and inflammasome-mediated inflammation via GPR81-mediated suppression of innate immunity. Gastroenterology 146, 1763–1774. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.014, PMID: 24657625 Huang S. C.-C. Smith A. M. Everts B. Colonna M. Pearce E. L. Schilling J. D. . (2016). Metabolic reprogramming mediated by the mTORC2-IRF4 signaling axis is essential for macrophage alternative activation. Immunity 45, 817–830. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.016, PMID: 27760338 Hui S. Ghergurovich J. M. Morscher R. J. Jang C. Teng X. Lu W. . (2017). Glucose feeds the TCA cycle via circulating lactate. Nature 551, 115–118. doi: 10.1038/nature24057, PMID: 29045397 Ip W. K. E. Hoshi N. Shouval D. S. Snapper S. Medzhitov R. (2017). Anti-inflammatory effect of IL-10 mediated by metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. Sci. (80-.) 356, 513–519. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3535, PMID: 28473584 Irizarry-Caro R. A. McDaniel M. M. Overcast G. R. Jain V. G. Troutman T. D. Pasare C. (2020). TLR signaling adapter BCAP regulates inflammatory to reparatory macrophage transition by promoting histone lactylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 30628–30638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009778117, PMID: 33199625 Ivashkiv L. B. (2020). The hypoxia–lactate axis tempers inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 85–86. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0259-8, PMID: 31819164 Khatib-Massalha E. Bhattacharya S. Massalha H. Biram A. Golan K. Kollet O. . (2020). Lactate released by inflammatory bone marrow neutrophils induces their mobilization via endothelial GPR81 signaling. Nat. Commun. 11, 3547. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17402-2, PMID: 32669546 Koivunen P. Hirsilä M. Remes A. M. Hassinen I. E. Kivirikko K. I. Myllyharju J. (2007). Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) hydroxylases by citric acid cycle intermediates. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 4524–4532. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610415200, PMID: 17182618 Latham T. Mackay L. Sproul D. Karim M. Culley J. Harrison D. J. . (2012). Lactate, a product of glycolytic metabolism, inhibits histone deacetylase activity and promotes changes in gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4794–4803. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks066, PMID: 22323521 Lauterbach M. A. Hanke J. E. Serefidou M. Mangan M. S. J. Kolbe C.-C. Hess T. . (2019). Toll-like receptor signaling rewires macrophage metabolism and promotes histone acetylation via ATP-citrate lyase. Immunity 51, 997–1011.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.11.009, PMID: 31851905 Lee J. V. Carrer A. Shah S. Snyder N. W. Wei S. Venneti S. . (2014). Akt-dependent metabolic reprogramming regulates tumor cell histone acetylation. Cell Metab. 20, 306–319. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.06.004, PMID: 24998913 Lee M. J. Bae J. Lee J. H. Park Y. J. Lee H. A. R. Mun S. . (2022). Serial change of endotoxin tolerance in a polymicrobial sepsis model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 6581. doi: 10.3390/ijms23126581, PMID: 35743025 Leite-Avalca M. C. G. Staats F. T. Verona D. de Souza P. Almeida M. C. Silva-Santos J. E. . (2019). Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant decreases levels of markers of organ dysfunction and alters vascular reactivity in aortic vessels in late sepsis in rats. Inflammation 42, 618–627. doi: 10.1007/s10753-018-0919-z, PMID: 30556096 Li B. Xia Y. Mei S. Ye Z. Song B. Yan X. . (2023). Histone H3K27 methyltransferase EZH2 regulates apoptotic and inflammatory responses in sepsis-induced AKI. Theranostics 13, 1860–1875. doi: 10.7150/thno.83353, PMID: 37064878 Li H. Liu C. Li R. Zhou L. Ran Y. Yang Q. . (2024). AARS1 and AARS2 sense l-lactate to regulate cGAS as global lysine lactyltransferases. Nature 634, 1229–1237. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07992-y, PMID: 39322678 Liao Y. Niu L. Ling J. Cui Y. Huang Z. Xu J. . (2025). Turning sour into sweet: Lactylation modification as a promising target in cardiovascular health. Metabolism 168, 156234. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2025.156234, PMID: 40113080 Liu Y. Liu Z. Tang H. Shen Y. Gong Z. Xie N. . (2019). The N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A)-forming enzyme METTL3 facilitates M1 macrophage polarization through the methylation of STAT1 mRNA. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 317, C762–C775. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00212.2019, PMID: 31365297 Liu Y. Yang S. Cai E. Lin L. Zeng P. Nie B. . (2020). Functions of lactate in the brain of rat with intracerebral hemorrhage evaluated with MRI/MRS and in vitro approaches. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 26, 1031–1044. doi: 10.1111/cns.13399, PMID: 32488963 Liu T. Wen Z. Shao L. Cui Y. Tang X. Miao H. . (2023). ATF4 knockdown in macrophage impairs glycolysis and mediates immune tolerance by targeting HK2 and HIF-1α ubiquitination in sepsis. Clin. Immunol. 254, 109698. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2023.109698, PMID: 37481013 Llibre A. Kucuk S. Gope A. Certo M. Mauro C. (2025). Lactate: A key regulator of the immune response. Immunity 58, 535–554. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2025.02.008, PMID: 40073846 Lu Z. Fang P. Li S. Xia D. Zhang J. Wu X. . (2025). Lactylation of histone H3k18 and egr1 promotes endothelial glycocalyx degradation in sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Adv. Sci. 12. doi: 10.1002/advs.202407064, PMID: 39721014 Ma W. Ao S. Zhou J. Li J. Liang X. Yang X. . (2022). Methylsulfonylmethane protects against lethal dose MRSA-induced sepsis through promoting M2 macrophage polarization. Mol. Immunol. 146, 69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2022.04.001, PMID: 35461144 Ma X. M. Geng K. Wang P. Jiang Z. Law B. Y.-K. Xu Y. (2024). MCT4-dependent lactate transport: a novel mechanism for cardiac energy metabolism injury and inflammation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 23, 96. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02178-2, PMID: 38486199 Maio M. Barros J. Joly M. Vahlas Z. Marín Franco J. L. Genoula M. . (2024). Elevated glycolytic metabolism of monocytes limits the generation of HIF1A-driven migratory dendritic cells in tuberculosis. Elife 12. doi: 10.7554/eLife.89319, PMID: 38922679 Mao L. Sun M. Chen Z. Zeng Z. Wu J. Chen Z. . (2022). The pyruvate dehydrogenase complex mitigates LPS-induced endothelial barrier dysfunction by metabolic regulation. Shock 57, 308–317. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001931, PMID: 35759309 Martins R. Carlos A. R. Braza F. Thompson J. A. Bastos-Amador P. Ramos S. . (2019). Disease tolerance as an inherent component of immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 37, 405–437. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042718-041739, PMID: 30673535 Moreno-Yruela C. Zhang D. Wei W. Bæk M. Liu W. Gao J. . (2022). Class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1–3) are histone lysine delactylases. Sci. Adv. 8. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi6696, PMID: 35044827 Nicola R. Madar R. Okun E. (2022). HCAR1-mediated l-lactate signaling suppresses microglial phagocytosis. NeuroMolecular Med. 24, 399–404. doi: 10.1007/s12017-022-08710-5, PMID: 35411485 Nolt B. Tu F. Wang X. Ha T. Winter R. Williams D. L. . (2018). Lactate and immunosuppression in sepsis. Shock 49, 120–125. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000958, PMID: 28767543 Novakovic B. Habibi E. Wang S.-Y. Arts R. J. W. Davar R. Megchelenbrink W. . (2016). β-glucan reverses the epigenetic state of LPS-induced immunological tolerance. Cell 167, 1354–1368.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.034, PMID: 27863248 Palsson-McDermott E. M. Curtis A. M. Goel G. Lauterbach M. A. R. Sheedy F. J. Gleeson L. E. . (2015). Pyruvate kinase M2 regulates hif-1α Activity and IL-1β Induction and is a critical determinant of the warburg effect in LPS-activated macrophages. Cell Metab. 21, 65–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.12.005, PMID: 25565206 Pan T. Sun S. Chen Y. Tian R. Chen E. Tan R. . (2022). Immune effects of PI3K/Akt/HIF-1α-regulated glycolysis in polymorphonuclear neutrophils during sepsis. Crit. Care 26, 29. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03893-6, PMID: 35090526 Pucino V. Certo M. Bulusu V. Cucchi D. Goldmann K. Pontarini E. . (2019). Lactate buildup at the site of chronic inflammation promotes disease by inducing CD4+ T cell metabolic rewiring. Cell Metab. 30, 1055–1074.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.10.004, PMID: 31708446 Qiao J. Tan Y. Liu H. Yang B. Zhang Q. Liu Q. . (2024). Histone H3K18 and ezrin lactylation promote renal dysfunction in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury. Adv. Sci. 11. doi: 10.1002/advs.202307216, PMID: 38767134 Rai G. Brimacombe K. R. Mott B. T. Urban D. J. Hu X. Yang S.-M. . (2017). Discovery and optimization of potent, cell-active pyrazole-based inhibitors of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). J. Med. Chem. 60, 9184–9204. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00941, PMID: 29120638 Rudd K. E. Johnson S. C. Agesa K. M. Shackelford K. A. Tsoi D. Kievlan D. R. . (2020). Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 395, 200–211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7, PMID: 31954465 Ryan D. G. O’Neill L. A. J. (2020). Krebs cycle reborn in macrophage immunometabolism. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 38, 289–313. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-081619-104850, PMID: 31986069 Schneider L. Chalmers D. O’Beirn S. Greenberg M. Cave G. (2022). Premorbid beta blockade in sepsis is associated with a lower risk of a lactate concentration above the lactate threshold, a retrospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 12, 20843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25253-8, PMID: 36460714 Semba H. Takeda N. Isagawa T. Sugiura Y. Honda K. Wake M. . (2016). HIF-1α-PDK1 axis-induced active glycolysis plays an essential role in macrophage migratory capacity. Nat. Commun. 7, 11635. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11635, PMID: 27189088 Sharma D. Singh M. Rani R. (2022). Role of LDH in tumor glycolysis: Regulation of LDHA by small molecules for cancer therapeutics. Semin. Cancer Biol. 87, 184–195. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.11.007, PMID: 36371026 Shimazu T. Hirschey M. D. Newman J. He W. Shirakawa K. Le Moan N. . (2013). Suppression of oxidative stress by β-hydroxybutyrate, an endogenous histone deacetylase inhibitor. Sci. (80-.) 339, 211–214. doi: 10.1126/science.1227166, PMID: 23223453 Singer M. Deutschman C. S. Seymour C. W. Shankar-Hari M. Annane D. Bauer M. . (2016). The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315, 801. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287, PMID: 26903338 Soares M. P. Teixeira L. Moita L. F. (2017). Disease tolerance and immunity in host protection against infection. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 83–96. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.136, PMID: 28044057 Stacpoole P. W. McCall C. E. (2023). The pyruvate dehydrogenase complex: Life’s essential, vulnerable and druggable energy homeostat. Mitochondrion 70, 59–102. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2023.02.007, PMID: 36863425 Suetrong B. Walley K. R. (2016). Lactic acidosis in sepsis: it’s not all anaerobic. Chest 149, 252–261. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-1703, PMID: 26378980 Sun T. Liu B. Li Y. Wu J. Cao Y. Yang S. . (2023). Oxamate enhances the efficacy of CAR-T therapy against glioblastoma via suppressing ectonucleotidases and CCR8 lactylation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 42, 253. doi: 10.1186/s13046-023-02815-w, PMID: 37770937 Sun S. Li H. Chen J. Qian Q. (2017). Lactic acid: no longer an inert and end-product of glycolysis. Physiology 32, 453–463. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00016.2017, PMID: 29021365 Tan C. Gu J. Chen H. Li T. Deng H. Liu K. . (2020). Inhibition of aerobic glycolysis promotes neutrophil to influx to the infectious site via CXCR2 in sepsis. Shock 53, 114–123. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001334, PMID: 30829852 Tan C. Gu J. Li T. Chen H. Liu K. Liu M. . (2021). Inhibition of aerobic glycolysis alleviates sepsis−induced acute kidney injury by promoting lactate/Sirtuin 3/AMPK−regulated autophagy. Int. J. Mol. Med. 47, 19. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4852, PMID: 33448325 Tannahill G. M. Curtis A. M. Adamik J. Palsson-McDermott E. M. McGettrick A. F. Goel G. . (2013). Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature 496, 238–242. doi: 10.1038/nature11986, PMID: 23535595 Tasdogan A. Faubert B. Ramesh V. Ubellacker J. M. Shen B. Solmonson A. . (2020). Metabolic heterogeneity confers differences in melanoma metastatic potential. Nature 577, 115–120. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1847-2, PMID: 31853067 Troutman T. D. Hu W. Fulenchek S. Yamazaki T. Kurosaki T. Bazan J. F. . (2012). Role for B-cell adapter for PI3K (BCAP) as a signaling adapter linking Toll-like receptors (TLRs) to serine/threonine kinases PI3K/Akt. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 273–278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118579109, PMID: 22187460 Urdinguio R. G. Lopez V. Bayón G. F. Diaz de la Guardia R. Sierra M. I. García-Toraño E. . (2019). Chromatin regulation by Histone H4 acetylation at Lysine 16 during cell death and differentiation in the myeloid compartment. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 5016–5037. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz195, PMID: 30923829 Van Wyngene L. Vandewalle J. Libert C. (2018). Reprogramming of basic metabolic pathways in microbial sepsis: therapeutic targets at last? EMBO Mol. Med. 10. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201708712, PMID: 29976786 Varga T. Mounier R. Horvath A. Cuvellier S. Dumont F. Poliska S. . (2016). Highly dynamic transcriptional signature of distinct macrophage subsets during sterile inflammation, resolution, and tissue repair. J. Immunol. 196, 4771–4782. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502490, PMID: 27183604 Varner E. L. Trefely S. Bartee D. von Krusenstiern E. Izzo L. Bekeova C. . (2020). Quantification of lactoyl-CoA (lactyl-CoA) by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry in mammalian cells and tissues. Open Biol. 10. doi: 10.1098/rsob.200187, PMID: 32961073 Wang N. Wang W. Wang X. Mang G. Chen J. Yan X. . (2022). Histone lactylation boosts reparative gene activation post–myocardial infarction. Circ. Res. 131, 893–908. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.320488, PMID: 36268709 Wang J. Yang P. Yu T. Gao M. Liu D. Zhang J. . (2022). Lactylation of PKM2 suppresses inflammatory metabolic adaptation in pro-inflammatory macrophages. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 18, 6210–6225. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.75434, PMID: 36439872 Wang Y. Qin L. Chen W. Chen Q. Sun J. Wang G. (2021). Novel strategies to improve tumour therapy by targeting the proteins MCT1, MCT4 and LAT1. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 226, 113806. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113806, PMID: 34517305 Wang J. Wang Z. Wang Q. Li X. Guo Y. (2024). Ubiquitous protein lactylation in health and diseases. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 29, 23. doi: 10.1186/s11658-024-00541-5, PMID: 38317138 Wculek S. K. Dunphy G. Heras-Murillo I. Mastrangelo A. Sancho D. (2022). Metabolism of tissue macrophages in homeostasis and pathology. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 19, 384–408. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00791-9, PMID: 34876704 Wiese E. K. Hitosugi S. Loa S. T. Sreedhar A. Andres-Beck L. G. Kurmi K. . (2021). Enzymatic activation of pyruvate kinase increases cytosolic oxaloacetate to inhibit the Warburg effect. Nat. Metab. 3, 954–968. doi: 10.1038/s42255-021-00424-5, PMID: 34226744 Willmann K. Moita L. F. (2024). Physiologic disruption and metabolic reprogramming in infection and sepsis. Cell Metab. 36, 927–946. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2024.02.013, PMID: 38513649 Wu B. Liang Z. Lan H. Teng X. Wang C. (2024). The role of PKM2 in cancer progression and its structural and biological basis. J. Physiol. Biochem. 80, 261–275. doi: 10.1007/s13105-024-01007-0, PMID: 38329688 Xie Z. Zhang D. Chung D. Tang Z. Huang H. Dai L. . (2016). Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lysine β-hydroxybutyrylation. Mol. Cell 62, 194–206. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.036, PMID: 27105115 Yang L. Xie M. Yang M. Yu Y. Zhu S. Hou W. . (2014). PKM2 regulates the Warburg effect and promotes HMGB1 release in sepsis. Nat. Commun. 5, 4436. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5436, PMID: 25019241 Yang K. Xu J. Fan M. Tu F. Wang X. Ha T. . (2020). Lactate suppresses macrophage pro-inflammatory response to LPS stimulation by inhibition of YAP and NF-κB activation via GPR81-mediated signaling. Front. Immunol. 11. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.587913, PMID: 33123172 Ye L. Jiang Y. Zhang M. (2022). Crosstalk between glucose metabolism, lactate production and immune response modulation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 68, 81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2022.11.001, PMID: 36376165 Yu X. Buttgereit A. Lelios I. Utz S. G. Cansever D. Becher B. . (2017). The cytokine TGF-β Promotes the development and homeostasis of alveolar macrophages. Immunity 47, 903–912.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.10.007, PMID: 29126797 Yu H. Yang Q. Qian Y. Luo S. Kong T. Yang G. . (2024). A positive correlation between serum lactate dehydrogenase level and in-hospital mortality in ICU sepsis patients: evidence from two large databases. Eur. J. Med. Res. 29, 525. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02071-4, PMID: 39487549 Zanoni I. Ostuni R. Marek L. R. Barresi S. Barbalat R. Barton G. M. . (2011). CD14 controls the LPS-induced endocytosis of toll-like receptor 4. Cell 147, 868–880. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.051, PMID: 22078883 Zasłona Z. O’Neill L. A. J. (2020). Cytokine-like roles for metabolites in immunity. Mol. Cell 78, 814–823. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.002, PMID: 32333837 Zhang D. Tang Z. Huang H. Zhou G. Cui C. Weng Y. . (2019). Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature 574, 575–580. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1678-1, PMID: 31645732 Zhang Y. Jia P. Wang K. Zhang Y. Lv Y. Fan P. . (2023). Lactate modulates microglial inflammatory responses after oxygen-glucose deprivation through HIF-1α-mediated inhibition of NF-κB. Brain Res. Bull. 195, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2023.02.002, PMID: 36746287 Zhang Q. Luo B. Sun X. Nagashima H. Wu Y. Liang G. . (2025). Non-histone lysine lactylation: Emerging roles in tumor biology and therapeutic implications. Ageing Res. Rev. 112, 102875. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2025.102875, PMID: 40825375 Zhang L. Li S. (2020). Lactic acid promotes macrophage polarization through MCT-HIF1α signaling in gastric cancer. Exp. Cell Res. 388, 111846. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.111846, PMID: 31945319 Zhong W. Yang H. Guan X. Xiong J. Sun C. Zhang C. . (2019). Inhibition of glycolysis alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in a mouse model. J. Cell. Physiol. 234, 4641–4654. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27261, PMID: 30256406

Edited by: Nidhi Srivastava, Maharaja Agrasen University (MAU), India

Reviewed by: Charles E. McCall, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, United States

Sanpreet Singh, University of Pittsburgh, United States