Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2235-2988 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1650832 Cellular and Infection Microbiology Correction Correction: Systematic bacteriophage selection for the lysis of multiple Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains Rieper Finja 1 2 Wittmann Johannes 3 Bunk Boyke 3 Spröer Cathrin 3 Häfner Melanie 4 Willy Christian 4 Müsken Mathias 5 Ziehr Holger 1 Korf Imke H.E. 1 * † Jahn Dieter 2 6 * † 1 Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine (ITEM), Braunschweig, Germany 2 Institute of Microbiology, Braunschweig University of Technology, Braunschweig, Germany 3 Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH (DSMZ), Braunschweig, Germany 4 Department Trauma & Orthopedic Surgery, Septic & Reconstructive Surgery, Research and Treatment Center Septic Defect Wounds, Federal Armed Forces of Germany, Military Academic Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany 5 Central Facility for Microscopy, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Braunschweig, Germany 6 Institute of Microbiology, Braunschweig Center of Systems Biology (BRICS), Braunschweig, Germany

Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

*Correspondence: Imke H.E. Korf, imke.korf@item.fraunhofer.de; Dieter Jahn, d.jahn@tu-bs.de

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship

 20 08 2025 2025 15 1650832 20 06 2025 11 07 2025 Copyright © 2025 Rieper, Wittmann, Bunk, Spröer, Häfner, Willy, Müsken, Ziehr, Korf and Jahn. 2025 Rieper, Wittmann, Bunk, Spröer, Häfner, Willy, Müsken, Ziehr, Korf and Jahn

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Correction on Systematic bacteriophage selection for the lysis of multiple Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains By Rieper F, Wittmann J, Bunk B, Spröer C, Häfner M, Willy C, Müsken M, Ziehr H, Korf IHE and Jahn D (2025) Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 15:1597009. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1597009 bacteriophages Pseudomonas aeruginosa phage susceptibility testing antibiotic resistance phage selection 01VSF18049 Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss10.13039/501100014840 section-in-acceptance Antibiotic Resistance and New Antimicrobial drugs

The Conflict of interest statement was erroneously given as “Author XY was employed by Leibniz Institute DSMZ, which is an independent, non-profit research infrastructure.

All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”

The correct Conflict of interest statement is “Author BB, CS alnd JW was employed by Leibniz Institute DSMZ, which is an independent, non-profit research infrastructure.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”

The original version of this article has been updated.

In the published article, there was a mistake in the numbers of isolated phages. The number of myoviruses was given as “13” and the number of podoviruses as “eight”.

A correction has been made to the section 3.2 Phage morphology, Line 284:285:

“Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the 25 phages were classified as twelve myoviruses including three jumbo phages, four siphoviruses and nine podoviruses (Figure 1)”.

The original version of this article has been updated.

Conflict of interest

Author BB, CS alnd JW was employed by Leibniz Institute DSMZ, which is an independent, non-profit research infrastructure.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.