Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.Frontiers in Cellular and Infection MicrobiologyFront. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.2235-2988Frontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fcimb.2024.1501233Cellular and Infection MicrobiologyCorrectionCorrigendum: Sensor histidine kinases kdpD and aauS regulate biofilm and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14SultanMaria1AryaRekha12*ChaurasiaAkhilesh Kumar1*KimKyeong Kyu1*1Department of Precision Medicine, Graduate School of Basic Medical Science, Institute for Antimicrobial Resistance Research and Therapeutics, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Corrigendum on Sensor histidine kinases kdpD and aauS regulate biofilm and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 By Sultan M, Arya R, Chaurasia AK and Kim KK (2023) Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13:1270667. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1270667Pseudomonas aeruginosatwo-component system (TCS)sensor histidine kinaseKdpDAauSquorum sensing (QS)virulence2017M3A9E4078553, 2021M3A9I2080487National Research Foundation10.13039/501100001321section-in-acceptanceMolecular Bacterial Pathogenesis
In the originally published article, a part of Figure 6 has duplication of waxworm image Figure 6C and editing errors in the strain names Figure 6D while making the final high-resolution images.
Confirming the roles of kdpD and aauS in the virulence potential of P. aeruginosa using the G. mellonella infection model. (A) Survival of G. mellonella larvae infected with 10 CFU of WT::pUCP18, ΔkdpD::pUCP18, ΔaauS::pUCP18, ΔkdpD::pUCP18kdpD, and ΔaauS::pUCP18aauS strains. The number of larvae in each group was 10 (n =10). The larvae were injected with 20 µL bacterial solution, and their survival was examined for 72 (h) The control group received 20 µL PBS. (B) The health index of larvae is plotted as an average of each group at multiple time points based on the health scoring index (movement, melaninization, cocoon formation, and survival). (C) An image showing the differential melaninization and death of waxworms infected with different bacterial strains; and (D) Assessment of CFUs recovered on selective media CA after 72 h of infection. The experiments were performed in triplicates. The significance of the data was analyzed using Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (ns, non significant; **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.005).
Specifically, the worm image in two panels of Figure 6C (PBS control-WT pUCP18 and ΔkdpD::pUCP18-ΔkdpD::pUCP18kdpD) are duplicated. The names of two strains (ΔkdpD::pUCP18kdpD and ΔaauS::pUCP18) in Figure 6D are interchanged. These errors have been corrected as shown in Figures 6C, D below. There is no change in the figure legends. We apologize for any inconvenience this error may have caused. It is noteworthy that these modifications do not change the scientific conclusions of the paper in any way.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.