<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2235-2988</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2023.1237500</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Cellular and Infection Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Microbiome profile and calprotectin levels as markers of risk of recurrent <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>V&#xe1;zquez-Cuesta</surname>
<given-names>Silvia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1831948"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lozano Garc&#xed;a</surname>
<given-names>Nuria</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez</surname>
<given-names>Ana I.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2341616"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olmedo</surname>
<given-names>Mar&#xed;a</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kestler</surname>
<given-names>Martha</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alcal&#xe1;</surname>
<given-names>Luis</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/586148"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mar&#xed;n</surname>
<given-names>Mercedes</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bermejo</surname>
<given-names>Javier</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/721959"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>D&#xed;az</surname>
<given-names>Francisco Fern&#xe1;ndez-Avil&#xe9;s</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mu&#xf1;oz</surname>
<given-names>Patricia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bouza</surname>
<given-names>Emilio</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reigadas</surname>
<given-names>Elena</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<on-behalf-of>HGUGM Microbiome Group</on-behalf-of>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara&#xf1;&#xf3;n</institution>, <addr-line>Madrid</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Instituto de Investigaci&#xf3;n Sanitaria Gregorio Mara&#xf1;&#xf3;n</institution>, <addr-line>Madrid</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Faculty of Biology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)</institution>, <addr-line>Madrid</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Department of Cardiology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara&#xf1;&#xf3;n</institution>, <addr-line>Madrid</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)</institution>, <addr-line>Madrid</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
<institution>Centro de Investigaci&#xf3;n Biom&#xe9;dica en red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CB06/06/0058)</institution>, <addr-line>Madrid</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
<institution>Centro de Investigaci&#xf3;n Biom&#xe9;dica en red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV)</institution>, <addr-line>Madrid</addr-line>, <country>Spain</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Piyush Baindara, University of Missouri, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Prajita Paul, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Neha Thakre, University of California, San Diego, United States; Maryam Meskini, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Iran</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Silvia V&#xe1;zquez-Cuesta, <email xlink:href="mailto:silviavazquez.lab@gmail.com">silviavazquez.lab@gmail.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1237500</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>09</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>23</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 V&#xe1;zquez-Cuesta, Lozano Garc&#xed;a, Fern&#xe1;ndez, Olmedo, Kestler, Alcal&#xe1;, Mar&#xed;n, Bermejo, D&#xed;az, Mu&#xf1;oz, Bouza and Reigadas</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>V&#xe1;zquez-Cuesta, Lozano Garc&#xed;a, Fern&#xe1;ndez, Olmedo, Kestler, Alcal&#xe1;, Mar&#xed;n, Bermejo, D&#xed;az, Mu&#xf1;oz, Bouza and Reigadas</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the main cause of nosocomial diarrhoea in developed countries. Recurrent CDI (R-CDI), which affects 20%-30% of patients and significantly increases hospital stay and associated costs, is a key challenge. The main objective of this study was to explore the role of the microbiome and calprotectin levels as predictive biomarkers of R-CDI.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We prospectively (2019-2021) included patients with a primary episode of CDI. Clinical data and faecal samples were collected. The microbiome was analysed by sequencing the hypervariable V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene on an Illumina Miseq platform.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>We enrolled 200 patients with primary CDI, of whom 54 developed R-CDI and 146 did not. We analysed 200 primary samples and found that Fusobacterium increased in abundance, while Collinsella, Senegalimassilia, Prevotella and Ruminococcus decreased in patients with recurrent versus non-recurrent disease. Elevated calprotectin levels correlated significantly with R-CDI (p=0.01). We built a risk index for R-CDI, including as prognostic factors age, sex, immunosuppression, toxin B amplification cycle, creatinine levels and faecal calprotectin levels (overall accuracy of 79%).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Calprotectin levels and abundance of microbial genera such as Fusobacterium and Prevotella in primary episodes could be useful as early markers of R-CDI. We propose a readily available model for prediction of R-CDI that can be applied at the initial CDI episode. The use of this tool could help to better tailor treatments according to the risk of R-CDI.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>calprotectin</kwd>
<kwd>biomarkers</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>C. difficile</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>microbiome</kwd>
<kwd>R-CDI</kwd>
<kwd>16S rRNA</kwd>
<kwd>prediction model</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="74"/>
<page-count count="17"/>
<word-count count="8371"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Intestinal Microbiome</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The clinical severity of <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection ranges from asymptomatic, mild, moderate and severe episodes and pseudomembranous colitis to toxic megacolon, sepsis or death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Rupnik et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>One of the current challenges associated with CDI is recurrent CDI (R-CDI), which usually affects 20%-30% of patients with a first CDI infection and increases to 40%-65% after a first R-CDI episode (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Barbut et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Leffler and Lamont, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Larrainzar-Coghen et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Smits et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>The costs associated with R-CDI in the United States reach $94,209 per year for patients with 1 R-CDI episode, increasing to $207,733 per year for patients with 3 or more R-CDI, with a length of stay ranging from 8.3 to 17.9 days (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Feuerstadt et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In Europe each episode of R-CDI involves an average cost of &#x20ac;40,941 and a length of stay of 55 days; these costs are 4-fold higher and with a 2.5-fold longer stay than for a primary CDI episode (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Wingen-Heimann et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The main risk factors associated with R-CDI include advanced age, hospital exposure, treatment with proton pump inhibitors, prior antibiotic treatment and initial disease severity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Eyre et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Lupse et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alrahmany et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The imbalance of gut&#x2019;s microbial community, known as gut microbiota dysbiosis, is strongly linked to the risk of CDI, especially that resulting from the action of antibiotics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Buffie et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Theriot et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). However, very few papers in the literature investigate the association between gut microbiota factors and the risk of R-CDI, and those that do include a low number of patients and report very disparate results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Khanna et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Seekatz et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Pakpour et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dawkins et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).Khanna et&#xa0;al. included 88 patients with CDI, 22 of them developed R-CDI; Seekatz et&#xa0;al. included 93 patients with CDI and 32 developed R-CDI, and Dawkins et&#xa0;al. included 53 patients with CDI and 19 developed R-CDI, all they found no significant differences in either alpha diversity or beta diversity. Pakpour et&#xa0;al. included 31 patients with CDI, of them 11 developed R-CDI, they found significant differences in alpha diversity and beta diversity. Because of the close relationship between gut microbiota and <italic>C. difficile</italic>, treatment with faecal microbiota transplantation for R-CDI to restore patients&#x2019; gut microbiota and prevent future recurrences is already included in IDSA/SHEA guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">McDonald et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). For this reason, clinical trials are now investigating the use of faecal microbiota transplantation in first episodes to reduce the risk of recurrence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Kates et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>New CDI treatments for reducing recurrences include fidaxomicin, bezlotoxumab, and SER-109 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Escudero-S&#xe1;nchez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Dubberke et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Feuerstadt et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Johnson et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Tashiro et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).Both fidaxomicin and bezlotoxumab involve reducing damage to the gut microbiota in CDI patients, which has been shown to result in lower recurrence rates. SER-109 is an orally administered faecal microbiota treatment, helping microbiota recovery to prevent possible recurrences, just like the faecal microbiota transplants that have been performed for years. However, new CDI treatments are costly, and recent European guidelines suggest applying a risk stratification strategy in cases of economic restraints (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">van Prehn et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Many attempts have been made to try to identify or profile patients at high risk for CDI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">van Rossen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), to date, no reliable objective markers to help predict who is at increased risk of R-CDI have been identified.</p>
<p>There are different markers of inflammation that can be measured directly in faeces, including faecal leukocyte analysis, in which blood is drawn from the patient, the leukocytes are labelled with a radioisotope and reintroduced to the patient. Stool samples are then collected and quantified for labelled leukocytes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Stathaki et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). Its main drawback is that it is invasive and exposes patients to radiation. Other methods involve measuring leukocyte proteins such as myeloperoxidase, lysozyme, elastase, S100A12, lactoferrin and calprotectin in the stool (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Gonzalez et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Lehmann et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Galgut et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Of these, calprotectin has been shown to be the most stable in faeces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Gonzalez et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) and is therefore the most commonly used in clinical practice, hence we included faecal calprotectin in our analyses.</p>
<p>Calprotectin is a protein secreted mainly by neutrophils, but also by macrophages, monocytes and dendritic cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Odink et&#xa0;al., 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Edgeworth et&#xa0;al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kumar et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). It is known to be a good marker of intestinal inflammation, can be obtained non-invasively and is stable at room temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Xu and Geczy, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Lasson et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>).Several studies have examined the role of calprotectin as a marker of severity of CDI with calprotectin levels being higher the more severe the CDI episode (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Peretz et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kim et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Suarez-Caranto&#xf1;a et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and as a marker of CDI itself with higher levels of calprotectin in patients with CDI than in patients without CDI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Popiel et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barbut et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>The high associated health and economic burden of R-CDI calls for the development of novel strategies by which R-CDI can be prevented in susceptible patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Heimann et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Reigadas Ramirez and Bouza, 2018</xref>). Profiling differences between gut microbiota and calprotectin levels in patients with CDI could help to predict which patients are more likely to experience R-CDI.</p>
<p>The main objective of this study was to explore the role of the microbiome and calprotectin as predictive biomarkers of R-CDI.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Setting, design, and study population</title>
<p>This study was carried out at Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara&#xf1;&#xf3;n in Madrid (Spain), a tertiary university hospital with 1,350 beds. Toxigenic <italic>C. difficile</italic> is routinely investigated in all diarrhoeic stool samples from patients older than 2 years. The microbiology laboratory receives samples both from the hospital itself and from 13 outpatient centres in the same area.</p>
<p>We conducted a prospective study from January 2019 to April 2021. We enrolled patients over 2 years old with a positive test result for toxigenic <italic>C. difficile</italic> and met the clinical criteria for CDI. We excluded patients younger than 2 years old because they have a high colonisation rate, which in many cases makes it difficult to determine the true cause of diarrhoea, in infants less than 7 days are 15%, in infants between 6 and 12 months 41% and 22% in 2 year old (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Tougas et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). It appears that the infants&#x2019; gut is immune to the effects of toxins A and B although the mechanism is unknown, very few cases of CDI have been described in infants under 2 years of age (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Jangi and Lamont, 2010</xref>). We collected clinical data and faecal samples from all patients. Patients were classified into 2 groups: patients with a primary CDI episode who did not subsequently develop recurrent CDI (non-recurrent) and patients with a primary CDI episode who subsequently developed recurrent CDI (recurrent).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Definitions</title>
<p>An episode of CDI was defined as the presence of a positive toxigenic CDI test result, together with diarrhoea (&#x2265;3 unformed stools in 24 h) or findings of pseudomembranous colitis by colonoscopy, following the definitions set out in the guidelines of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">McDonald et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>CDI is considered recurrent when it recurs within 8 weeks after a previous episode, provided the symptoms from the previous episode resolved after completion of the initial treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">van Prehn et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Having new symptoms and a positive sample after 60 days was considered a new episode.</p>
<p>Defined daily dose (DDD) is defined in the &#x201c;WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology&#x201d; as the assumed average maintenance dose per day in the case of a drug used for its main indication in adults (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">WHO, 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>We classified antimicrobial drugs as anaerobic, as previously described by Mulder et al, &#x201c;We also classified the antimicrobial drugs in antimicrobial drugs with anaerobic activity (consisting of combinations of penicillins, including beta-lactamase inhibitors (J01CR), lincosamides (J01 FF) and imidazole derivatives (metronidazole) (J01XD): anaerobic+)&#x2026;&#x201d; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Mulder et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>The severity of the CDI episode was defined according to the SHEA and IDSA guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">McDonald et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Death was considered CDI-related when there were no other attributable causes and/or it occurred within 10 days after the diagnosis of CDI and/or was due to known complications of CDI.</p>
<p>As for microbiome-related definitions, we considered richness as the number of different species found in a sample (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Whittaker et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>). Evenness (Pielou index) was defined as the degree to which different species are similar or uniform in abundance. Diversity indicated the degree of species richness and abundance, where alpha diversity is referred to the diversity within an individual -Inverse Simpson index: an indication of the richness in a community with the same evenness; and Shannon index: takes into account the number of species living in a habitat (richness) and their relative abundance (evenness)- and beta diversity referred to the difference in diversity between individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Whittaker et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>).</p>
<p>We considered as microbiota-related diseases the following: cholelithiasis, colorectal cancer, hepatic encephalopathy, idiopathic constipation, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, familial Mediterranean fever, gastric lymphoma or carcinoma, arthritis, asthma, atopy, dermatitis, psoriasis, autoimmune disease, fatigue syndrome, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, myocardial ischaemia, metabolic syndrome, behavioural disorders, multiple sclerosis, myoclonus dystonia, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, oxalate kidney stones and Parkinson&#x2019;s disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Detection of toxigenic <italic>C. difficile</italic>
</title>
<p>Samples were processed using a rapid detection kit for toxigenic <italic>C. difficile</italic>. This rapid test consists of glutamate dehydrogenase antigen and toxins A and B detection by immunochromatography (C Diff Quik-Chek Complete assay, TechLab, Blacksburg, VA, USA) (Sensitivity 90.5%, specificity 93.1%, predictive positive value 76.4%, predictive negative value 97.6% in comparison with bacterial culture) and a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay of the <italic>C. difficile</italic> toxin B gene (Xpert.<italic>C. difficile</italic> Assay, GeneXpert, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) (Sensitivity 98.79%, specificity 90.82%, predictive positive value 56.58%, predictive negative value 99.83% in comparison with bacterial culture).</p>
<p>In addition, all samples were cultured on <italic>C. difficile</italic> selective agar (bioMeri&#xe9;ux, Marcy l&#x2019;Etoile, France). Suspected toxigenic <italic>C. difficile</italic> colonies were confirmed using immunochromatography (C Diff Quik-Chek Complete assay, TechLab, Blacksburg, VA, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Calprotectin assay</title>
<p>Calprotectin levels were measured using EDITM Quantitative Faecal Calprotectin ELISA (Measurement range: 1 &#x2013; 2000 &#xb5;g/g stool) (Epitope Diagnostics, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA), according to the manufacturers&#x2019; instructions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Clinical data</title>
<p>The demographic data collected included age and sex. Regarding clinical data, the underlying conditions were recorded using the McCabe and Jackson score for prognosis of underlying diseases. The McCabe score was used to categorise the risk of death by underlying comorbidities. The 3 categories were rapidly fatal (within 1 year), ultimately fatal (within 5 years) and non-fatal (&gt;5 years) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Jackson and McCabe, 1962</xref>); comorbidity was graded according to the Charlson comorbidity index (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Charlson et&#xa0;al., 1987</xref>). The Charlson comorbidity index is one of the most extensively used comorbidity indices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Huang et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). This index consists of 19 conditions, each of which is assigned a weighting of 1, 2, 3 or 6 based on the adjusted hazard ratio for each comorbidity. The sum of the weighted scores gives the total score (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Yurkovich et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Other clinical data collected included antibiotic treatment, proton pump inhibitor use, nasogastric tube use, mechanical ventilation, surgery and chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the month prior to diagnosis of CDI. Regarding antibiotic consumption, the DDDs for each antibiotic were recorded. For the CDI episode, data on severity of the episode, treatment received, treatment failure, recurrence, mortality and CDI-related mortality were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Sample processing</title>
<p>Immediately upon receipt, the faecal samples were homogenized, aliquoted and stored at &#x2212;80&#xb0;C until the day of analysis. Total DNA was extracted from faecal samples using the Qiagen Fast QiaAmp DNA stool mini kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol with the inclusion of a physical lysis step. The sample was lysed twice at 6.5m/s for 45 seconds in FastPrep-24 (MPBio, Derby, UK) with lysis matrix tubes E (MPBio, Derby, UK). The hypervariable V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR, with 515-806 primers (515:GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA, 806:GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT) tailed with sequences to incorporate Illumina flow cell adapters and indexing barcodes (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). PCR amplification program was 1 cycle of 98&#xb0;C 30 seconds; 25 cycles of 98&#xb0;C 10 seconds, 60&#xb0;C 20 seconds, 72&#xb0;C 20 seconds; 1 cycle of 72&#xb0;C 2 minutes. Q5&#xae; High-Fidelity 2X Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA)</p>
<p>Primer dimers and low-molecular-weight products were removed using Agencourt Ampure Beads (Beckman Coulter, Spain). Samples were quantified and quality was checked for amplicon size using the 4200 TapeStation (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Amplicons were equimolar pooled and sequenced (2 &#xd7; 250) on an Illumina Miseq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) according to standard protocols.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>The raw data were pre-processed, grouped by operational taxonomic units (OTUs) with 97% similarity and taxonomically classified using MOTHUR software (Patrick D. Schloss, PhD, &#xa9; 2019, Michigan, USA) and SILVA and RDP databases. Analyses of species richness (OTUs observed), evenness (Pielou index), alpha diversity (Shannon index) and beta diversity (Bray-Curtys distance, unweighted unifrac distance) were performed with MOTHUR and R software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B501">R Core Team, 2021</xref>, Vienna, Austria).</p>
<p>The statistical analyses were performed using R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B501">R Core Team, 2021</xref>, Vienna, Austria). Frequencies were calculated for qualitative variables, and proportions were calculated with their 95% confidence interval (CI) following a binomial distribution. For quantitative variables, the median and interquartile range (IQR) or mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated. Microbiota analyses were performed with R using the packages phyloseq, microbiome, microbiomeStat, vegan, DESeq2 and microeco.</p>
<p>The MaAslin2 (Multivariate microbial Association by Linear models) library was used to study the relationship between microbiota and clinical variables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Mallick et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Differences between groups were determined using the &#x3c7;<sup>2</sup> test. Continuous variables were compared using the <italic>t</italic> test or the Mann-Whitney test (when a normal distribution could not be assumed). The normality of the distribution of continuous variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test with the Lilliefors correction. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess predictors of R-CDI. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were calculated. A p value &lt;0.05 was considered significant. All significant variables in the bivariate study were included in the multivariate model, in the multivariate study a logistic regression was performed in which the weight of each variable was scored according to its odds ratio.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Ethical issues</title>
<p>This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara&#xf1;&#xf3;n in Madrid (number MICRO.HGUGM.2016-029).</p>
<p>Participants&#x2019; informed consent was obtained before enrolment. All patients included in the study were given the sufficient time to make the decision to participate and understood each of the components of the study. Patients were also informed about their rights of access, rectification, cancellation and opposition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_9">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>Data availability</title>
<p>The data for this study have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) at EMBL-EBI under accession number PRJEB57947 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB57947">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB57947</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<p>During the study period, there were 1308 samples positive for toxigenic <italic>C. difficile</italic> from 906 patients. We obtained informed consent and a valid sample from 227 patients who had their first episode of CDI. Of these, 24 patients died before the end of the 2-month recurrence period follow-up, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up. We selected for analysis only samples from the patient&#x2019;s first episode. Finally, we had 200 primary samples belonging to 200 patients, of whom 54 developed R-CDI and 146 did not.</p>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Demographic and clinical characteristics</title>
<p>The median age of the patients was 67 years for those with non-recurrent disease and 78.50 years for those with recurrent disease. In both groups, there were more females than males (non-recurrent 54.8% [80/146]; recurrent 74.1% [40/54]; p = 0.013).</p>
<p>The most common underlying diseases were cardiovascular, metabolic, endocrine, nephrourological and gastrointestinal diseases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The median Charlson comorbidity index was 4 (IQR: 2-6) in the non-recurrent group and 3.50 (IQR: 3-6) in the recurrent group (p= 0.256). Both groups contained a high percentage of patients with underlying diseases related to alterations of the microbiota, although this difference was not statistically significant (non-recurrent 65.8% [96/146]; recurrent 75.9% [41/54]; (p=0.169). Within this group of diseases, diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease were the most common (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Approximately 36% of all patients were immunocompromised (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Surprisingly, a higher percentage of patients had inflammatory bowel disease in the non-recurrent group (13.5%) than in the recurrent group (2.4%), and a higher percentage of patients had arthritis in the recurrent group (12.2%) than in the non-recurrent group (3.1%) (all p &lt;0.05).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Clinical characteristics of patients with a primary <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection episode.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Non-Rec (n=146)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Rec (n=54)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">p value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>AGE</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">67.00 (55.00, 79.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">78.50 (70.25, 85.75)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>SEX</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.013</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Female</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">80 (54.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40 (74.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Male</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">66 (45.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14 (25.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ADMITTED PATIENT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">106 (72.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29 (53.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.011</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>INSTITUTIONALISED PATIENT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (3.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (13.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.012</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>DAYS OF HOSPITAL STAY</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.00 (9.00, 36.25)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.00 (8.00, 27.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.222</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>HIV</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (4.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (3.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.897</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>SOLID ORGAN TRANSPLANT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20 (13.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (13.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.892</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>MALIGNANCY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30 (20.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13 (24.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CARDIOLOGICAL DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">97 (66.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50 (92.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>PULMONARY DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32 (21.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15 (27.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.386</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56 (38.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19 (35.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.681</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>LIVER DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40 (27.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (14.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.064</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>HAEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31 (21.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (13.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ENDOCRINE DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60 (41.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28 (51.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.174</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>METABOLIC DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">64 (43.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34 (63.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.016</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>INFECTIOUS DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (12.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (11.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.814</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ALLERGIC DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (2.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.289</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>RHEUMATIC DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29 (19.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20 (37.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.012</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>NEUROLOGICAL DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40 (27.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (33.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.411</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>NEPHROUROLOGICAL DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">53 (36.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27 (50.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.079</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>IMMUNE-MEDIATED DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (4.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (5.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.661</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>NUMBER OF DISEASES</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.00 (3.00, 5.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00 (4.00, 7.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.00 (2.00, 6.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.50 (3.00, 6.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.256</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>BMI</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.23 (22.04, 28.36)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.92 (23.03, 30.59)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.117</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>SMOKER</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (15.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (7.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.121</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>MICROBIOTA DYSBIOSIS&#x2013;RELATED DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">96 (65.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41 (75.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.169</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">DIABETES MELLITUS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45 (46.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20 (48.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.838</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">CHOLELITHIASIS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (11.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (12.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.902</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (24.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (26.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.722</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (5.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">ASTHMA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (10.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (12.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">ATOPY</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.512</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">PSORIASIS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.512</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">GASTRIC LYMPHOMA OR CARCINOMA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.512</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">COLORECTAL CARCINOMA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (6.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (7.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.817</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (5.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.468</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13 (13.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.049</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">IDIOPATHIC THROMBOCYTOPENIC PURPURA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.512</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">SKIN DISEASE</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.532</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">PARKINSON DISEASE</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (6.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (9.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">HEPATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (2.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (4.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.374</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">BEHAVIOURAL DISORDERS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.532</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">COELIAC DISEASE</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">ARTHRITIS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (3.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (12.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.038</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">IDIOPATHIC CONSTIPATION</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.512</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (3.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.827</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">NUMBER OF MICROBIOTA DYSBIOSIS&#x2013;RELATED DISEASES Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00 (1.00, 2.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00 (1.00, 2.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.575</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ALCOHOL INTAKE &gt; 50G/DAY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (5.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.269</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>COLECTOMY OR ILEOSTOMY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15 (10.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (9.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.832</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CHOLECYSTECTOMY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (12.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (14.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.643</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>IMMUNOCOMPROMISED</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">53 (36.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21 (38.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.737</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Non-Rec, non-recurrent disease; Rec, recurrent disease; N-Miss, number of cases with no information. Q1, Q3, quartile 1, quartile 3. BMI, body mass index. Significant p values (&lt;0.05) are shown in bold.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>No significant differences regarding risk factors for CDI were recorded in either of the groups. The main risk factor for developing CDI was antibiotic therapy in the month prior to sampling. In the patients with non-recurrent disease, the most frequent antibiotics were cephalosporins, followed by penicillins, carbapenems and quinolones, while in the patients with recurrent disease the most frequently administered antibiotics were cephalosporins, followed by quinolones, penicillins and carbapenems (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). As for other CDI risk factors, treatment with proton pump inhibitors and being hospitalised were widely present (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Antibiotic treatment received 1 month prior to the primary <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection episode.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Non-Rec (n=131)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Rec (n=51)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">p value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>TOTAL DDDs</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.31 (6.00, 22.57)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.67 (8.00, 22.75)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.572</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>DDDs ANAEROBE</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.71 (2.17, 12.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.79 (2.68, 11.90)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>SULPHONAMIDE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (13.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (7.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.273</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>QUINOLONES</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42 (32.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22 (43.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>RIFAMYCIN</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (8.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (3.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.292</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CARBAPENEMS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43 (32.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12 (23.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>GLUCOPEPTIDES</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20 (15.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (5.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.087</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>1ST GENERATION CEPHALOSPORINS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13 (9.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (13.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.461</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>2ND GENERATION CEPHALOSPORINS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (4.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (5.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.716</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>3RD GENERATION CEPHALOSPORINS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44 (33.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (45.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.148</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>4TH GENERATION CEPHALOSPORINS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (4.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (5.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.716</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>5TH GENERATION CEPHALOSPORINS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (2.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.276</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>PENICILLINS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">55 (42.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21 (41.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.921</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>LIPOPEPTIDES</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (2.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.892</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>AMINOGLYCOSIDES</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (4.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.409</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>PHOSPHONATES</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (4.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (3.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.846</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>NITROIMIDAZOLE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16 (12.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (15.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.534</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>MACROLIDES</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (6.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (3.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.561</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>OXAZOLIDINONES</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11 (8.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (3.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.292</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>LINCOSAMIDES</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (5.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.034</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>MONOBACTAMS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (2.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.486</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>TETRACYCLINES</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (1.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.375</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CEPHALOSPORINS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">67 (51.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32 (62.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.158</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>BETALACTAMS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115 (87.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44 (86.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.783</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ANAEROBICS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">95 (72.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33 (64.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Non-Rec, non-recurrent disease; Rec, recurrent disease; N-Miss, number of cases with no information. Q1, Q3, quartile 1, quartile 3. Significant p values (&lt;0.05) are shown in bold.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Risk factors for <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Non-Rec (n=146)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Rec (n=54)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">p value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ANTIFUNGAL TREATMENT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20 (13.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5 (9.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.391</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ANTIBIOTIC TREATMENT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">131 (89.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51 (94.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.301</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>NUMBER OF ANTIBIOTICS</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.00 (1.00, 4.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.00 (1.00, 4.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.753</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR TREATMENT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">121 (83.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45 (83.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.985</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>NASOGASTRIC TUBE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25 (17.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (7.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>MECHANICAL VENTILATION</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31 (21.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (13.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.179</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>SURGERY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39 (26.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (14.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.074</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>NEUTROPENIA</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (16.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (13.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.581</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>RISK OF INFECTION NEUTROPENIA</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16 (11.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (5.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CHEMOTHERAPY OR RADIOTHERAPY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30 (20.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (13.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.213</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>DIALYSIS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (6.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.169</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE TREATMENT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50 (34.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (33.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.879</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Non-Rec, non-recurrent disease; Rec, recurrent disease; N-Miss, number of cases with no information.Q1, Q3, quartile 1, quartile 3.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Regarding the severity of the CDI episodes, most were mild (non-recurrent 65.8%; recurrent 64.8%; p=0.901). There were 2 cases of toxic megacolon and 2 cases of pseudomembranous colitis, all in the non-recurrent group. Most CDI episodes (non-recurrent 57.5%; recurrent 38.9%; p=0.020) were hospital onset, healthcare facility&#x2013;associated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The median toxin B PCR cycle was lower in patients with recurrent disease than in those with non-recurrent disease (23.25 vs 26.10; p=0.003). Those with recurrent disease had higher levels of creatinine and faecal calprotectin than those with non-recurrent disease (all p&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics of the primary <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection episode.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Non-Rec (n=146)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Rec (n=54)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">p value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>EPISODE TYPE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.008</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">CA-CDI</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32 (21.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (18.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">CO-HCFA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26 (17.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17 (31.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.037</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">HO-HCFA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">84 (57.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21 (38.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.020</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Undetermined</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (2.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (11.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.016</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>TOXIN B PCR CYCLE</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.10 (23.50, 29.90)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.55 (21.80, 27.12)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.003</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>TOXIN B PCR CYCLE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.004</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">&lt;23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29 (20.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22 (40.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">&gt;23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">112 (79.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32 (59.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>BINARY TOXIN</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34 (23.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (18.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.416</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>HYPERVIRULENT RIBOTYPE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">No hypervirulent</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">140 (95.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50 (92.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">181</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (2.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (7.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">027</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (2.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>FEVER PREVIOUS 24 H</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42 (28.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13 (24.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.509</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>DAYS OF DIARROHEA</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.00 (2.00, 7.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00 (4.00, 8.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.018</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ABDOMINAL PAIN</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76 (52.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24 (44.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.339</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ABDOMINAL BLOATING</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28 (19.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7 (13.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.287</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>TOXIC MEGACOLON</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (1.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.387</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>PSEUDOMEMBRANOUS COLITIS</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (1.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.175</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>LEUCOCYTES</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8,500.00 (5,970.00, 12,500.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10,900.00 (7,110.00, 14,700.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.181</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>NEUTROPHILS</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6,300.00 (3,500.00, 10,050.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7,500.00 (4,900.00, 12,600.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.213</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ALBUMIN</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.30 (3.00, 3.73)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.40 (2.90, 4.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.472</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">74</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>Aspartate transaminase (AST)</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.00 (18.75, 78.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43.00 (42.00, 50.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.362</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">114</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>Alanine transaminase (ALT)</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.00 (12.00, 33.25)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.00 (9.50, 22.50)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.025</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CREATININE</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.059</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.92 (0.62, 1.48)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.23 (0.82, 1.67)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CREATININE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.003</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">&lt;1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76 (55.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16 (31.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">&gt;1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60 (44.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35 (68.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>FAECAL CALPROTECTIN (&#xb5;g/mg)</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.01</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">92.91 (2.67, 172.25)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">150.36 (57.11, 253.75)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>FAECAL CALPROTECTIN</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">higher_185</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27 (21.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (45.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">lower_185</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">101 (78.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28 (54.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>EPISODE SEVERITY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.156</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">mild</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">96 (65.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35 (64.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.901</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">severe</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37 (25.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (33.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.261</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">severe-complicated</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13 (8.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.083</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>OTHER CAUSE OF DIARRHOEA</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">138 (94.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52 (96.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.609</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CDI TREATMENT RECEIVED</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">142 (97.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">54 (100.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.287</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>METRONIDAZOLE TREATMENT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50 (34.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14 (25.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.252</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>VANCOMYCIN TREATMENT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">125 (85.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">48 (88.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.617</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>FIDAXOMYCIN TREATMENT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (2.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3 (5.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>FMT</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10 (6.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (7.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>BEZLOTOXUMAB</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9 (6.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.211</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Non-Rec, non-recurrent disease; Rec, recurrent disease; CDI, <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection; N-Miss, number of cases with no information. Q1, Q3, quartile 1, quartile 3. Significant p values (&lt;0.05) are shown in bold.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In both groups, most patients received treatment for CDI (non-recurrent, 97.9% [142/146]; recurrent, 100% [54/54]), mainly with vancomycin (non-recurrent, 85.6%, recurrent, 88.7%), followed by metronidazole (non-recurrent, 34.2%, recurrent, 26.4%). Fourteen patients included in this study had been enrolled in a clinical trial with faecal microbiota transplantation as their initial treatment. Few patients received fidaxomicin, and few patients received bezlotoxumab. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to the CDI treatment they received (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>One patient with recurrent disease died (probably CDI-related), and no patients in the non-recurrent group died from a probably CDI-related condition. Both 30-day mortality and 90-day mortality (3.7% and 11.1%, respectively) were higher in the recurrent group than in the non-recurrent group (0% and 1.4% respectively) (all p&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Outcome of the primary CDI episode.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Non-Rec (n=146)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Rec (n=54)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">p value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>ICU ADMISSION</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (4.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.441</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>OUTCOME AT DISCHARGE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Dead</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (4.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Healing</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">126 (99.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44 (95.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CDI-RELATED DEATH</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.194</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Not related</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (0.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Probably related</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>TREATMENT FAILURE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1 (1.9%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.103</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>30-DAY MORTALITY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (3.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.019</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>90-DAY MORTALITY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2 (1.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6 (11.1%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.002</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Non-Rec, non-recurrent disease; Rec, recurrent disease; CDI, <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection; N-Miss, number of cases with no information.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Probably CDI-related death: Death was considered CDI-related when there were no other attributable causes and/or it occurred within 10 days after the diagnosis of CDI and/or was due to known complications of CDI.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>ICU, intensive care unit. Significant p values (&lt;0.05) are shown in bold.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Calprotectin levels and recurrent CDI predictive models</title>
<p>We analyzed 179 samples for calprotectin levels (128 from non-recurrent patients and 51 from recurrent patients). The median values obtained were 98.92&#xb5;g/mg (IQR 8.33-191.05). We observed significant differences between non-recurrent and recurrent patients (92.91 &#xb5;g/mg vs 150.36 &#xb5;g/mg; p=0.01).We obtained a median calprotectin value of 81.32 &#xb5;g/mg (IQR: 0.00-171.02) for mild CDI episodes and 148.16 &#xb5;g/mg (IQR: 55.83-230.38) for severe CDI episodes (p=0.002).</p>
<p>We classified faecal calprotectin levels as &gt;185&#xb5;g/mg and &lt;185&#xb5;g/mg (45.1% and 21.1% of the recurrent group, respectively; p=0.01) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Patients with faecal calprotectin &gt;185&#xb5;g/mg had a lower median toxin B PCR cycle threshold than patients with faecal calprotectin levels &lt;185&#xb5;g/mg (24.00 vs 25.60; p=0.034). Patients with faecal calprotectin higher than 185&#xb5;g/mg had higher levels of leucocytes and more days of diarrhoea than patients with lower levels of faecal calprotectin. In addition, more patients had severe and severe-complicated CDI episodes with a calprotectin level &gt;185&#xb5;g/mg and more mild episodes with calprotectin &lt;185&#xb5;g/mg (all p&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics of patients and <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection episode according to faecal calprotectin levels.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Lower than 185 &#x3bc;g/mg (n=129)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Higher than 185 &#x3bc;g/mg<break/>(n=50)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">p value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>AGE</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">71.00 (58.00, 80.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">74.00 (59.25, 84.75)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.262</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>SEX</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.663</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Female</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">78 (60.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32 (64.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Male</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51 (39.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (36.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>TOXIN A/B POSITIVE (EIA)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">73 (57.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30 (60.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>TOXIN B PCR CYCLE</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.60 (23.05, 29.55)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.00 (22.20, 27.10)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.034</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>BINARY TOXIN POSITIVE (PCR)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25 (19.5%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14 (28.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.194</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>MICROBIOTA DYSBIOSIS&#x2013;RELATED DISEASE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">95 (73.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32 (64.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.202</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>IMMUNOCOMPROMISED</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57 (44.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12 (24.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.013</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>NEUTROPENIA (&lt; 600/mm<sup>3</sup>)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16 (12.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0 (0.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.012</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>DAYS OF DIARROHEA</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.00 (2.00, 7.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.00 (3.00, 9.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.042</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>LEUCOCYTES</bold> Median (Q1, Q3)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8150.00 (5450.00, 11400.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11200.00 (7320.00, 16800.00)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.006</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>EPISODE SEVERITY</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Mild</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">98 (76.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (46.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Severe</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (17.8%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (46.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">Severe-complicated</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8 (6.2%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4 (8.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.666</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>CDI RECURRENCE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28 (21.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23 (46.0%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>TOXIN B PCR CYCLE</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.102</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N-Miss</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">&lt;23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31 (24.4%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18 (36.7%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.102</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="right">&gt;23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">96 (75.6%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31 (63.3%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.102</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>CDI, <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection; N-Miss, Number of cases with no information. EIA, enzyme immunoassay. Q1, Q3, quartile 1, quartile 3. Significant p values (&lt;0.05) are shown in bold.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>We ran a multivariate model and found the following independent risk factors for developing R-CDI: age, faecal calprotectin level &gt;185&#xb5;g/mg, toxin B PCR cycle threshold &lt;23, immunosuppression, female sex, and creatinine levels higher than 1mg/dL (all p&lt;0.05). We built a risk index for developing R-CDI based on the risk factors we obtained in the multivariable model (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">
<bold>Table&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>). The ROC curve analysis showed that this risk index had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.783, with a power of 0.999, significance level of 0.05 and an overall accuracy of 79.0% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Predictive model of recurrent <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Characteristic</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">OR<italic>
<sup>1</sup>
</italic>
</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">95% CI<italic>
<sup>1</sup>
</italic>
</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">P value</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Points</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Faecal calprotectin</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;&gt;185 &#xb5;g/mg</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.91, 11.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Toxin B PCR Cycle</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;&lt;23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.37, 8.42</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.009</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Immunosuppression</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Yes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.96, 14.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Sex</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Female</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.94</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.01, 13.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Creatinine</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;&gt;1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.40</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.45, 8.39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Age</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;&gt;70</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.74</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.22, 16.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>
<sup>1</sup> OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>ROC curve (receiver operating characteristic curve) of our model of independent risk factors for developing a recurrent CDI: faecal calprotectin level &gt;185&#xb5;g/mg, toxin B PCR cycle lower than 23, immunosuppression, female gender, age higher than 65 years, and creatinin levels higher than 1mg/dL (all p&lt;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1237500-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Community structure (diversity)</title>
<p>When studying the primary episode microbiome diversity of patients who went on to develop R-CDI and those who did not, we found significant differences in the inverse Simpson index (p=0.021), with lower values in patients with non-recurrent disease.</p>
<p>We found significant differences between those who presented any type of inflammatory bowel disease in the Shannon index, richness and evenness, with lower values than those of patients who did not present this condition (all p&lt;0.05). Patients with a nasogastric tube during the month prior to the episode had lower values in the Shannon index, richness and evenness (all p&lt;0.05).We found lower evenness values for patients who had taken probiotics in the month prior to the episode and those who had undergone colectomy or ileostomy and lower richness values for smokers and patients who had received antifungal treatment in the month prior to the episode.</p>
<p>We also studied the effects of antibiotics on the diversity of the microbiota and found that patients who received more than 3 antibiotics had less alpha diversity, less evenness (all p&lt;0.05) and significant differences in beta diversity with respect to patients who received fewer than 3 antibiotics. The differences in alpha diversity and evenness remained significant in patients with recurrent disease compared with those who had non-recurrent disease.</p>
<p>In terms of beta diversity and of the variance of the intra-group samples, we found no significant differences between the recurrent and the non-recurrent group.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Community composition (relative abundance of taxa)</title>
<p>Regarding the relative abundance of the different taxonomic groups, we found that Bacteroidetes was the major phylum in patients with non-recurrent disease (40.18%), followed by Firmicutes (35.69%), whereas in those with recurrent disease, the major phylum was Firmicutes (38.26%), followed by Bacteroidetes (37.63%). Differences in relative abundance between the groups were not significant.</p>
<p>At the taxonomic family level, we found Bacteroidaceae to be the most abundant taxon in all patients (non-recurrent, 30.57%; recurrent, 28.02%), followed by Enterobacteriaceae (non-recurrent, 16.77%; recurrent, 13.75%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). When we analysed the taxonomic level of genus, we found that <italic>Fusobacterium</italic> increased in abundance in recurrent versus non-recurrent disease and that <italic>Collinsella</italic>, <italic>Senegalimassilia</italic>, <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Ruminococcus</italic> decreased in abundance in recurrent versus non-recurrent disease (all p&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Heatmap of family relative abundance in each sample, divided in Non-recurrent patients (group Non-Rec; left) and recurrent patients (Rec; right).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1237500-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Genus Log2 Fold Change represent differentially abundance genus between groups. Recurrent patients vs Non-recurrent patients.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1237500-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Our analysis of the differences between patients with calprotectin levels &gt;185&#xb5;g/mg and those with levels &lt;185&#xb5;g/mg revealed that, as in the recurrent group, <italic>Fusobacterium</italic> increased and <italic>Senegalimassilia</italic>, <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Ruminococcus</italic> decreased. We also found other differences such as lower abundance of <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, <italic>Lactococcus</italic>, <italic>Streptococcus</italic>, <italic>Blautia</italic>, <italic>Dorea, Bacteroides, Faecalicoccus, Clostridium XVIa</italic> and <italic>Parasutterella</italic> in patients with faecal calprotectin &gt;185&#xb5;g/mg than in those with lower values (all p&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Genus Log2 Fold Change represent differentially abundance genus between the following groups: Fecal calprotectin &gt;185<italic>&#x3bc;</italic>g/mg vs &lt;185<italic>&#x3bc;</italic>g/mg.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1237500-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We performed a multivariable association study between microbial communities and clinical metadata and found that the genera <italic>Senegalimassilia, Alistipes, Blautia</italic> and <italic>Lactococcus</italic> had a negative association with faecal calprotectin concentration and that the genera <italic>Bacteroides, Fusobacterium</italic> and <italic>Dialister</italic> had a positive association with faecal calprotectin concentration (all p&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">
<bold>Table&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T8" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Association between microbial communities and calprotectin concentrations.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Genus</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Coefficient</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Standard deviation</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">p value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">q value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Senegalimassilia</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-2.451</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7983</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0025</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.043</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Bacteroides</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.136</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.6656</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Coprobacter</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.756</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4819</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.013</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Alistipes</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-1.723</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5023</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Lactococcus</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-4.241</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.9881</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Finegoldia</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.760</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5526</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Blautia</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-2.854</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7209</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.005</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Coprococcus</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-2.219</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.6547</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.022</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Faecalibacterium</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-4.352</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.8891</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Dialister</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.839</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4885</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Megasphaera</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.351</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.8040</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Fusobacterium</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.141</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5655</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.009</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Akkermansia</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-2.184</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5800</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.009</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Bacterial genera positively or negatively associated with faecal calprotectin concentrations.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In terms of similarities between the OTUs of both groups, we found that they shared 1921 OTUs: 1119 unique OTUs in the recurrent group and 2241 unique OTUs in the non-recurrent group.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In the present study, we profiled the microbiota of a large cohort of patients with CDI and found marked differences that could be useful in predicting R-CDI. We also established a significant association between elevated calprotectin values in patients who will subsequently develop R-CDI and built a risk index for R-CDI.</p>
<p>Several studies have characterised the microbiota in patients with CDI and R-CDI, although very few have attempted to establish relationships between gut microbiota and the likelihood of developing R-CDI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Khanna et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Seekatz et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Pakpour et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dawkins et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). These studies include a limited number of patients, and their results are conflicting.</p>
<p>With respect to diversity, we found significant differences in alpha diversity (inverse Simpson index) between patients who later developed R-CDI and those who did not. This was also observed in a smaller study by Pakpour et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Pakpour et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). When studying beta diversity, we did not observe any significant differences between the recurrent and non-recurrent groups, consistent with findings published elsewhere, except for those of Pakpour et&#xa0;al. who found significant differences in beta diversity between these groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Khanna et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Seekatz et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Pakpour et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dawkins et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>With respect to changes in genus abundance, we observed significant differences in genera such as <italic>Fusobacterium</italic>, which is more abundant in recurrent than non-recurrent disease, and in <italic>Collinsella</italic>, <italic>Senegalimassilia</italic>, <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Ruminococcus</italic>, with lower abundance in recurrent than in non-recurrent disease. Very few data have been reported on taxa abundance in patients with primary CDI who later develop R-CDI, and the available data are conflicting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Khanna et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Seekatz et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Pakpour et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dawkins et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The genus <italic>Fusobacterium</italic>, which we observed to have higher abundance in patients who will further develop R-CDI, is considered an opportunistic pathogen associated with a wide range of human conditions, including inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer, preterm birth and intestinal inflammation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Strauss et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Amitay et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Engevik et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The genera that we found in lower abundance in patients with recurrent disease, such as <italic>Collinsella</italic>, <italic>Senegalimassilia</italic>, <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Ruminococcus</italic>, were previously associated with healthy individuals, had anti-inflammatory properties and produced metabolites that are very important for the preservation of the intestinal barrier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Ze et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Ko et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Adamberg et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Yeoh et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The devalences of these genera could play a role in maintaining intestinal inflammation and thus providing a favourable environment for new R-CDI, although this has not been demonstrated.</p>
<p>These microbiota findings may relate to the results we had obtained for calprotectin, with higher levels in recurrent disease than in non-recurrent disease, as calprotectin is a good biomarker of intestinal inflammation. We also found the same response for some of the above-mentioned genera in patients with high calprotectin levels than in those with low calprotectin levels. In this sense, at diagnosis, patients who are likely to develop R-CDI have higher levels of calprotectin, together with a higher abundance of <italic>Fusobacterium</italic> and lower abundance of <italic>Senegalimassilia</italic>, <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Ruminococcus</italic>. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between calprotectin levels and microbiota abundance alterations (in CDI).</p>
<p>However, although it is known that faecal calprotectin reaches the gut via migration of neutrophils into gastrointestinal tissues due to inflammatory processes, the exact mechanism by which this happens, and the genera or species of microbes involved in this process, are not known (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Pathirana et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>In the literature, some studies use calprotectin levels to distinguish true episodes of CDI from colonisation by <italic>C. difficile</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Popiel et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) or to classify the severity of the CDI episode. We obtained statistically significantly higher levels of faecal calprotectin in severe episodes than in mild episodes, consistent with previous studies, which reported significant results between calprotectin levels and the severity of the CDI episode. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barbut et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kim et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Han et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Suarez-Caranto&#xf1;a et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, few studies have investigated the relationship between calprotectin levels and risk of developing R-CDI: those that did showed no significant association between R-CDI and calprotectin levels, and most of them included a low number of patients studied or only included a specific subpopulation such as children or cancer patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Swale et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Peretz et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Nicholson et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">He et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Our results for calprotectin reveal a significant association between elevated calprotectin values in patients who will subsequently develop R-CDI, possibly because we analysed a large cohort of patients.</p>
<p>We propose an early prediction model for R-CDI based on clinical and analytical data such as age, sex, immunosuppression, creatinine level, calprotectin level and <italic>C. difficile</italic> PCR toxin B gene cycle, which can be assessed using commercially available PCR methods found in many microbiology laboratories. Our R-CDI prediction model included variables already known to be risk factors for R-CDI or poor outcome of CDI, such as advanced age, female sex, creatinine levels &gt;1mg/dL, <italic>C. difficile</italic> PCR toxin B gene cycle threshold &lt;23, immunosuppression and faecal calprotectin levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Eyre et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Lupse et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Miller et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Reigadas et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Orig&#xfc;en et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alrahmany et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Hence, the data on which the model is based are easy to obtain at the time of diagnosis of the primary CDI episode, with a reasonable AUC (0.783). Although several prediction models have been developed for R-CDI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Eyre et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">D&#x2019;Agostino et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">LaBarbera et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Escobar et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cobo et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Ruzicka et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), none have been widely implemented in clinical practice. External validations of prediction tools have revealed disappointing results, probably owing to the low quality of most studies and the small effects of the proposed prognostic factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">van Rossen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Most of these predictive R-CDI models yielded much lower AUC values than ours, including those of Ruzicka et&#xa0;al. (AUC 0.65-0.63), Cobo et&#xa0;al. (AUC 0.72), Zilberberg et&#xa0;al. (AUC 0.643), Escobar et&#xa0;al. (AUC 0.591-0.605), D&#x2019;Agostino et&#xa0;al. (AUC 0.64) and Larrainzar-Coghen et&#xa0;al. (AUC 0.66). Of these models, only that of Cobo et&#xa0;al. incorporated laboratory parameters related to <italic>C. difficile</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">D&#x2019;Agostino et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Larrainzar-Coghen et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Zilberberg et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Escobar et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cobo et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Ruzicka et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).Orig&#xfc;en et&#xa0;al. obtained a predictive model for R-CDI with an AUC very similar to ours, ie, 0.785. Their model also included the PCR cycles of the <italic>C. difficile</italic> toxin (as did ours), although when they included the result of toxin detection by EIA, their AUC dropped to 0.775 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Orig&#xfc;en et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). We found only 2 models with higher AUC values than ours, namely, that of Hu et&#xa0;al. (AUC 0.80 in the validation cohort, 0.62 in the derivation cohort), which includes the detection of <italic>C. difficile</italic> antitoxin A IgG, and that of LaBarbera et&#xa0;al. (AUC 0.83), which does not include any laboratory parameters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">LaBarbera et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). However, given that the model of Hu et&#xa0;al. is based on obtaining antitoxin IgA levels at day 12 of the CDI diagnosis, it cannot be used to guide treatment at the beginning of the episode. The model of LaBarbera et&#xa0;al. was complex, including 25 different variables with an overall accuracy of 66.1%, whereas ours was 79%. Having a simple and good R-CDI prediction model could help to guide early treatment of R-CDI.</p>
<p>Our study and our prediction model are limited by their single-centre design; therefore, our results should be validated in multicentre studies. On the other hand, we recruited a large number of patients, making ours the largest cohort to date in which microbiota in CDI and risk of recurrence are analysed. Our results can therefore be considered robust.</p>
<p>In conclusion, abundance of various bacterial genera and faecal calprotectin levels could be used as biomarkers to help identify patients who will develop R-CDI from those who will not. We also propose the use of our simple R-CDI risk index, which includes readily available data and rapid laboratory tests. The use of these early markers of R-CDI can guide management and treatment of the initial CDI episode, thus optimizing the use of resources, especially for patients who are at increased risk of R-CDI. Further research is warranted.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>HGUGM Microbiome Group</title>
<p>Carmen Moreno, Mara Perellada, Celso Arando, Lorena Cuss&#xf3;, Manuel Desco, Javier Vaquero, Marta Fern&#xe1;ndez, Rafael Correa, Dar&#xed;o Garc&#xed;a de Viedma, Ana I. Fern&#xe1;ndez, Nuria L&#xf3;pez, Silvia V&#xe1;zquez-Cuesta, Elena Reigadas, Javier Bermejo, Francisco Fern&#xe1;ndez-Avil&#xe9;s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena</ext-link>, PRJEB57947.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Mara&#xf1;&#xf3;n in Madrid (number MICRO.HGUGM.2016-029). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ER and EB designed the study. SV-C collected data and samples. SV-C and NG performed the data analysis. SV-C, ER, EB, MO, MK, LA, MM and PM contributed to data interpretation. SV-C wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SV-C, ER, EB, MO, MK, LA, MM, JB, FD, PM and AF contributed to the intellectual content and approved the final draft. SV-C, ER and EB had access to and verified the underlying study data. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study has been funded by &#x201c;Instituto de Salud Carlos III&#x201d; (ISCIII) through the projects PI16/00490, PI20/01381, FI21/00310, PIE16/00055 and co-funded by the European Union.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank Thomas O&#x2019;Boyle for his help in the preparation of the manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1237500/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1237500/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Presentation_1.pptx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="ST1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adamberg</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adamberg</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ernits</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larionova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Voor</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaagura</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Composition and metabolism of fecal microbiota from normal and overweight children are differentially affected by melibiose, raffinose and raffinose-derived fructans</article-title>. <source>Anaerobe</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>100</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.06.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alrahmany</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ereshefsky</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>El Nekidy</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harb</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pontiggia</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghazi</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Risk factors for recurrence of <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> in hospitalized patients</article-title>. <source>J. Infect. Public Health</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1642</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1649</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jiph.2021.09.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amitay</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Werner</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vital</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pieper</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>H&#xf6;fler</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gierse</surname> <given-names>I. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Fusobacterium and colorectal cancer: causal factor or passenger? Results from a large colorectal cancer screening study</article-title>. <source>Carcinogenesis</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>781</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>788</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/carcin/bgx053</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barbut</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gouot</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lapidus</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suzon</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Syed-Zaidi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lalande</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Faecal lactoferrin and calprotectin in patients with <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection: a case-control study</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>36</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2423</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2430</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10096-017-3080-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barbut</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richard</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamadi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chomette</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burghoffer</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Epidemiology of recurrences or reinfections of <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic>-associated diarrhea</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>2386</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2388</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.38.6.2386-2388.2000</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Buffie</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jarchum</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Equinda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lipuma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gobourne</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viale</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Profound alterations of intestinal microbiota following a single dose of clindamycin results in sustained susceptibility to <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic>-induced colitis</article-title>. <source>Infect. Immun.</source> <volume>80</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>62</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/iai.05496-11</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Charlson</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pompei</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ales</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MacKenzie</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation</article-title>. <source>J. Chronic Dis.</source> <volume>40</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>383</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cobo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Merino</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>C&#xf3;zar-Llist&#xf3;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marrod&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Prediction of recurrent C<italic>lostridium difficile</italic> infection at the bedside: the GEIH-CDI score</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents</source> <volume>51</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>398</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.09.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>D&#x2019;Agostino</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pencina</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kean</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gorbach</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Risk estimation for recurrent <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection based on clinical factors</article-title>. <source>Clin. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>58</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1386</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1393</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/ciu107</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dawkins</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allegretti</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McClure</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delaney</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bry</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Gut metabolites predict <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> recurrence</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>87</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-022-01284-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dubberke</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Puckett</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Obi</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamal-Bahl</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desai</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stuart</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Impact of updated clinical practice guidelines on outpatient treatment for <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection and associated clinical outcomes</article-title>. <source>Open Forum Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <elocation-id>ofac435</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ofid/ofac435</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Edgeworth</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gorman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freemont</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hogg</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Identification of p8,14 as a highly abundant heterodimeric calcium binding protein complex of myeloid cells</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>266</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>7706</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7713</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-9258(20)89506-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Engevik</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Danhof</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engevik</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang-Graham</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engevik</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Fusobacterium nucleatum</italic> secretes outer membrane vesicles and promotes intestinal inflammation</article-title>. <source>mBio</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>2</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.02706-20</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Escobar</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kipnis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greene</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mast</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Prediction of recurrent <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection using comprehensive electronic medical records in an integrated healthcare delivery system</article-title>. <source>Infect. Control Hosp Epidemiol.</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1203</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/ice.2017.176</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Escudero-S&#xe1;nchez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ru&#xed;z-Ruizg&#xf3;mez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez-Fradejas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a Fern&#xe1;ndez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olmedo Samperio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cano Yuste</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Real-world experience with bezlotoxumab for prevention of recurrence of <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Med.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>1</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jcm10010002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eyre</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wyllie</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dingle</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Griffiths</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Finney</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Predictors of first recurrence of <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection: implications for initial management</article-title>. <source>Clin. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>55</volume> (<supplement>Suppl 2</supplement>), <fpage>S77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S87</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/cis356</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feuerstadt</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Louie</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lashner</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>E. E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bryant</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>SER-109, an oral microbiome therapy for recurrent <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>N Engl. J. Med.</source> <volume>386</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>220</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>229</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMoa2106516</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feuerstadt</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dahdal</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sacks</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Healthcare resource utilization and direct medical costs associated with index and recurrent <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection: a real-world data analysis</article-title>. <source>J. Med. Econ</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>603</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>609</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13696998.2020.1724117</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Galgut</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lemberg</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Day</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leach</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The value of fecal markers in predicting relapse in inflammatory bowel diseases</article-title>. <source>Front. Pediatr.</source> <volume>5</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fped.2017.00292</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilen</surname> <given-names>C. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burnham</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Markers of intestinal inflammation for the diagnosis of infectious gastroenteritis</article-title>. <source>Clin. Lab. Med.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>333</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>344</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cll.2015.02.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Investigation of intestinal microbiota and fecal calprotectin in non-toxigenic and toxigenic <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> colonization and infection</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>6</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms8060882</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaplan</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramanathan</surname> <given-names>L. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamboj</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Fecal calprotectin concentrations in cancer patients with <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2341</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2346</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10096-018-3381-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heimann</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cruz Aguilar</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mellinghof</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vehreschild</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Economic burden and cost-effective management of <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infections</article-title>. <source>Med. Mal Infect.</source> <volume>48</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.medmal.2017.10.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Katchar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kyne</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maroo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tummala</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dreisbach</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Prospective derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for recurrent <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Gastroenterology</source> <volume>136</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1214</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.038</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gou</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diao</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Q. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Charlson comorbidity index helps predict the risk of mortality for patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy</article-title>. <source>J. Zhejiang Univ Sci. B</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1631/jzus.B1300109</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jangi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lamont</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Asymptomatic colonization by <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> in infants: implications for disease in later life</article-title>. <source>J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr.</source> <volume>51</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181d29767</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Molina</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Howard</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwarz</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Real-World Comparison of Bezlotoxumab to Standard of Care Therapy for Prevention of Recurrent <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> Infection in Patients at High Risk for Recurrence</article-title>. <source>Clin. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>74</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1572</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1578</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/ciab674</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kates</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaulke</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Wolfe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zimbric</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haight</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Watson</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Fecal microbiota transplantation for patients on antibiotic treatment with <italic>C. difficile</italic> infection history (GRAFT): Study protocol for a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to prevent recurrent <italic>C. difficile</italic> infections</article-title>. <source>Contemp Clin. Trials Commun.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <elocation-id>100576</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100576</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khanna</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montassier</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knights</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pardi</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Gut microbiome predictors of treatment response and recurrence in primary <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Aliment Pharmacol. Ther.</source> <volume>44</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>715</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>727</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/apt.13750</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yong</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Fecal calprotectin level reflects the severity of <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Ann. Lab. Med.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3343/alm.2017.37.1.53</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jo</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>I. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Anti-inflammatory effects of ursodeoxycholic acid by lipopolysaccharide-stimulated inflammatory responses in RAW 264.7 macrophages</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <elocation-id>e0180673</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0180673</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steinkasserer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berchtold</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Interleukin-10 influences the expression of MRP8 and MRP14 in human dendritic cells</article-title>. <source>Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.</source> <volume>132</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1159/000073263</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>LaBarbera</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikiforov</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parvathenani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pramil</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gorrepati</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A prediction model for <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> recurrence</article-title>. <source>J. Community Hosp. Internal Med. Perspect.</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <elocation-id>26033</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3402/jchimp.v5.26033</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Larrainzar-Coghen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodriguez-Pardo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Puig-Asensio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferrer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bartolom&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>First recurrence of <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection: clinical relevance, risk factors, and prognosis</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>371</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>378</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10096-015-2549-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lasson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stotzer</surname> <given-names>P. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xd6;hman</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Isaksson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sapnara</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strid</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The intra-individual variability of faecal calprotectin: a prospective study in patients with active ulcerative colitis</article-title>. <source>J. Crohns Colitis</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crohns.2014.06.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leffler</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lamont</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>N Engl. J. Med.</source> <volume>372</volume> (<issue>16</issue>), <fpage>1539</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1548</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1056/NEJMra1403772</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burri</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beglinger</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The role and utility of faecal markers in inflammatory bowel disease</article-title>. <source>Therap Adv. Gastroenterol.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/1756283x14553384</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lupse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flonta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cioara</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Filipescu</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Todor</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Predictors of first recurrence in <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic>-associated disease. A study of 306 patients hospitalized in a ROmanian tertiary referral center</article-title>. <source>J. Gastrointestin Liver Dis.</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>403</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mallick</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahnavard</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McIver</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies</article-title>. <source>PloS Comput. Biol.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>e1009442</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009442</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McCabe</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1962</year>). <article-title>Gram-negative bacteremia: I. Etiology and ecology</article-title>. <source>Arch. Internal Med.</source> <volume>110</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>847</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>855</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/archinte.1962.03620240029006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerding</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bakken</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carroll</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coffin</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Clinical practice guidelines for <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA) and society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA)</article-title>. <source>Clin. Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>66</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>987</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>994</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cid/ciy149</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Louie</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mullane</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weiss</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lentnek</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Golan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Derivation and validation of a simple clinical bedside score (ATLAS) for <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection which predicts response to therapy</article-title>. <source>BMC Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>148</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2334-13-148</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mulder</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Radjabzadeh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiefte-de Jong</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uitterlinden</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kraaij</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stricker</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Long-term effects of antimicrobial drugs on the composition of the human gut microbiota</article-title>. <source>Gut Microbes</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1795492</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19490976.2020.1791677</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nicholson</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crews</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Starke</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Z. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DuPont</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Recurrent <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection in children: patient risk factors and markers of intestinal inflammation</article-title>. <source>Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J.</source> <volume>36</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>383</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/inf.0000000000001450</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Odink</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cerletti</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Br&#xfc;ggen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clerc</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarcsay</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zwadlo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Two calcium-binding proteins in infiltrate macrophages of rheumatoid arthritis</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>330</volume> (<issue>6143</issue>), <fpage>80</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/330080a0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Orig&#xfc;en</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orellana</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corbella</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>San Juan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz-Ruig&#xf3;mez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Toxin B PCR amplification cycle threshold adds little to clinical variables for predicting outcomes in <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection: a retrospective cohort study</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>57</volume> (<issue>2</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.01125-18</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pakpour</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhanvadia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amarnani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gibbons</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gurry</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Identifying predictive features of <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection recurrence before, during, and after primary antibiotic treatment</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>148</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-017-0368-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pathirana</surname> <given-names>W. G. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chubb</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gillett</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasikaran</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Faecal calprotectin</article-title>. <source>Clin. Biochem. Rev.</source> <volume>39</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peretz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tkhawkho</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pastukh</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brodsky</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halevi</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nitzan</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Correlation between fecal calprotectin levels, disease severity and the hypervirulent ribotype 027 strain in patients with <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>BMC Infect. Dis.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>309</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12879-016-1618-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Popiel</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gheorghe</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eastmond</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Usefulness of adjunctive fecal calprotectin and serum procalcitonin in individuals positive for <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> toxin gene by PCR assay</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Microbiol.</source> <volume>53</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>3667</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3669</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jcm.02230-15</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B501">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>R Core Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <source>A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing</source> (<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>). Available online: <uri xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org/">https://www.R-project.org/</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reigadas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alcal&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valerio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mar&#xed;n</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouza</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Toxin B PCR cycle threshold as a predictor of poor outcome of <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection: a derivation and validation cohort study</article-title>. <source>J. Antimicrob. Chemother.</source> <volume>71</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1380</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1385</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jac/dkv497</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reigadas Ramirez</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouza</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Economic burden of <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection in European countries</article-title>. <source>Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.</source> <volume>1050</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-72799-8_1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rupnik</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilcox</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerding</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection: new developments in epidemiology and pathogenesis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>526</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>536</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro2164</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruzicka</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kondo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fujimoto</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Craig</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mikamo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Development of a clinical prediction model for recurrence and mortality outcomes after <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection using a machine learning approach</article-title>. <source>Anaerobe</source> <volume>77</volume>, <elocation-id>102628</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anaerobe.2022.102628</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Seekatz</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santhosh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Young</surname> <given-names>V. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of the fecal microbiome in patients with recurrent and nonrecurrent <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Genome Med.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>47</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13073-016-0298-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smits</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyras</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lacy</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilcox</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuijper</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>16020</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrdp.2016.20</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stathaki</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koukouraki</surname> <given-names>S. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karkavitsas</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koutroubakis</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Role of scintigraphy in inflammatory bowel disease</article-title>. <source>World J. Gastroenterol.</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>22</issue>), <fpage>2693</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2700</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3748/wjg.15.2693</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Strauss</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaplan</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beck</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rioux</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Panaccione</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devinney</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Invasive potential of gut mucosa-derived <italic>Fusobacterium nucleatum</italic> positively correlates with IBD status of the host</article-title>. <source>Inflammation Bowel Dis.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1971</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1978</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ibd.21606</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Suarez-Caranto&#xf1;a</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodriguez-Torres</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viteri-Noel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pintado</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia-Fernandez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mora-Pimentel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Usefulness of fecal calprotectin in the management of patients with toxigenic <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Med.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>8</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jcm10081627</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Swale</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miyajima</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Little</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beadsworth</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Calprotectin and lactoferrin faecal levels in patients with <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection (CDI): a prospective cohort study</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <elocation-id>e106118</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0106118</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tashiro</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mihara</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasaki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimamura</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimamura</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Oral fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for the treatment of <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials</article-title>. <source>J. Infect. Chemother.</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1536</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1545</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jiac.2022.08.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Theriot</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Young</surname> <given-names>V. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Antibiotic-induced alterations of the gut microbiota alter secondary bile acid production and allow for <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> spore germination and outgrowth in the large intestine</article-title>. <source>mSphere</source> <volume>1</volume> (<issue>1</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSphere.00045-15</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tougas</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lodha</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandermeer</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lorenzetti</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarr</surname> <given-names>P. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarr</surname> <given-names>G. A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Prevalence of detection of <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> among asymptomatic children: A systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>JAMA Pediatr.</source> <volume>175</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <elocation-id>e212328</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2328</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Prehn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reigadas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vogelzang</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouza</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hristea</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guery</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection in adults</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Infection</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>S1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S21</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Rossen</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ooijevaar</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandenbroucke-Grauls</surname> <given-names>C. M. J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dekkers</surname> <given-names>O. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuijper</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Prognostic factors for severe and recurrent <italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Infection</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>321</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>331</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.026</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Whittaker</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Willis</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Field</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity</article-title>. <source>J. Biogeography</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>453</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>470</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00563.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>WHO</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <source>Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2021</source> (<publisher-loc>Oslo, Norway</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>World Health Organization</publisher-name>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://www.whocc.no">www.whocc.no</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wingen-Heimann</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viprey</surname> <given-names>V. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilcox</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vehreschild</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Clostridioides difficile</italic> infection (CDI): A pan-European multi-center cost and resource utilization study, results from the Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe CDI (COMBACTE-CDI)</article-title>. <source>Clin. Microbiol. Infect.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>651.e1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>651.e8</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cmi.2022.12.019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geczy</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>IFN-gamma and TNF regulate macrophage expression of the chemotactic S100 protein S100A8</article-title>. <source>J. Immunol.</source> <volume>164</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>4916</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4923</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4916</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yeoh</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ip</surname> <given-names>L. Y. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>F. K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Prevotella</italic> species in the human gut is primarily comprised of <italic>Prevotella copri, Prevotella stercorea</italic> and related lineages</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>9055</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-12721-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yurkovich</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avina-Zubieta</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gorenchtein</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lacaille</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A systematic review identifies valid comorbidity indices derived from administrative health data</article-title>. <source>J. Clin. Epidemiol.</source> <volume>68</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ze</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duncan</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Louis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flint</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Ruminococcus bromii</italic> is a keystone species for the degradation of resistant starch in the human colon</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1535</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1543</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2012.4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zilberberg</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shorr</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baser</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Development and validation of a risk score for <italic>Clostridium difficile</italic> infection in medicare beneficiaries: A population-based cohort study</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.</source> <volume>64</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1690</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1695</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jgs.14236</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>