<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2235-2988</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2023.1203582</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Cellular and Infection Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Diffusible signal factor primes plant immunity against <italic>Xanthomonas campestris</italic> pv. <italic>campestris</italic> (<italic>Xcc</italic>) <italic>via</italic> JA signaling in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> and <italic>Brassica oleracea</italic>
</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Qian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/185987"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Fang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1494297"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>Cong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2233089"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhai</surname>
<given-names>Tingting</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>Ziwei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Limei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Xuemeng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>Zhenhua</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/201967"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>Shuishan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/189490"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Biology Institute, Hebei Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Shijiazhuang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Hebei Technology Innovation Center of Microbiological Control on Main Crop Disease</institution>, <addr-line>Shijiazhuang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Shijiazhuang Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Shijiazhuang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Yangyang Zhao, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences (JAAS), China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Qian Guoliang, Nanjing Agricultural University, China; Juan F. Gonz&#xe1;lez, Nationwide Children&#x2019;s Hospital, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Shuishan Song, <email xlink:href="mailto:shuishans620@163.com">shuishans620@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1203582</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>11</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>16</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Zhao, Liu, Song, Zhai, He, Ma, Zhao, Jia and Song</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhao, Liu, Song, Zhai, He, Ma, Zhao, Jia and Song</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>Many Gram-negative bacteria use quorum sensing (QS) signal molecules to monitor their local population density and to coordinate their collective behaviors. The diffusible signal factor (DSF) family represents an intriguing type of QS signal to mediate intraspecies and interspecies communication. Recently, accumulating evidence demonstrates the role of DSF in mediating inter-kingdom communication between DSF-producing bacteria and plants. However, the regulatory mechanism of DSF during the <italic>Xanthomonas</italic>-plant interactions remain unclear.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Plants were pretreated with different concentration of DSF and subsequent inoculated with pathogen <italic>Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc)</italic>. Pathogenicity, phynotypic analysis, transcriptome combined with metabolome analysis, genetic analysis and gene expression analysis were used to evaluate the priming effects of DSF on plant disease resistance.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>We found that the low concentration of DSF could prime plant immunity against <italic>Xcc</italic> in both <italic>Brassica oleracea</italic> and <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>. Pretreatment with DSF and subsequent pathogen invasion triggered an augmented burst of ROS by DCFH-DA and DAB staining. CAT application could attenuate the level of ROS induced by DSF. The expression of <italic>RBOHD</italic> and <italic>RBOHF</italic> were up-regulated and the activities of antioxidases POD increased after DSF treatment followed by Xcc inoculation. Transcriptome combined with metabolome analysis showed that plant hormone jasmonic acid (JA) signaling involved in DSF-primed resistance to <italic>Xcc</italic> in Arabidopsis. The expression of JA synthesis genes (<italic>AOC2, AOS, LOX2, OPR3</italic> and <italic>JAR1</italic>), transportor gene (<italic>JAT1</italic>), regulator genes (<italic>JAZ1</italic> and <italic>MYC2</italic>) and responsive genes (<italic>VSP2, PDF1.2</italic> and <italic>Thi2.1</italic>) were up-regulated significantly by DSF upon Xcc challenge. The primed effects were not observed in JA relevant mutant <italic>coi1-1</italic> and <italic>jar1-1</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>These results indicated that DSF-primed resistance against <italic>Xcc</italic> was dependent on the JA pathway. Our findings advanced the understanding of QS signal-mediated communication and provide a new strategy for the control of black rot in <italic>Brassica oleracea</italic>.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>quorum sensing</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Xanthomonas campestris</italic> pv. <italic>campestris</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>plant immunity</kwd>
<kwd>priming</kwd>
<kwd>Jasmonic acid</kwd>
<kwd>DSF</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">31601144</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn002">2015CB150604</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn003">226Z6501G</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn004">22304</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002855</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn003">Hebei Provincial Department of Bureau of Science and Technology<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100008238</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn004">Hebei Academy of Science<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100014898</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="9"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="37"/>
<page-count count="17"/>
<word-count count="8683"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Molecular Bacterial Pathogenesis</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Quorum sensing (QS) is a process of cell-to-cell communication depending on the population density of bacteria. By monitoring the concentration of QS signal molecules, bacteria regulate gene expression to coordinate their collective behaviors in order to improve their adaptability to complex nutrition and environmental conditions. The diffusible signal factor (DSF) family represents an intriguing type of QS signal found in diverse Gram-negative bacteria and mediates intraspecies and interspecies communication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">He et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). DSF- mediated cell-to-cell signaling plays an important role in the virulence of the <italic>Xanthomonas</italic> group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). In <italic>Xanthomonas campestris</italic> pv. <italic>campestris</italic> (<italic>Xcc</italic>), a global-threat phytopathogen that causes black rot on crucifers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Meyer et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>), DSF regulates the production of several secreted virulence factors such as the exopolysaccharide (EPS) xanthan, extracellular cell wall-hydrolyzing enzymes, and glucan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Barber et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>). Recently, increasing evidence shows that DSF mediates inter-kingdom communication between DSF-producing bacteria and their eukaryotic hosts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tran et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Song et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zhai et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zhu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">He et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref> reported first that plants have evolved to recognize DSF signals and induce innate immunity against pathogen infection in a dose-dependent manner. Infiltration of leaves with 100 &#x3bc;M of DSF induced hypersensitive reaction (HR) -like symptom, callose deposition, programmed cell death, the accumulation of autofluorescent compounds and hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), and the expression of pathogenesis-related protein 1 (<italic>PR-1</italic>) gene and then reduced disease severity and <italic>Xcc</italic> growth in <italic>Nicotiana benthamiana</italic>, <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>, and rice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Intriguingly, infiltration of 10 &#x3bc;M of DSF did not induce a significant amount of callose deposition, while pre-infiltration with DSF and subsequent challenge with flg22 caused a substantial amount of callose deposition. This suggests that the application of a lower concentration of DSF may prime plants and influence their subsequent defense response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>The DSF modulation of plant immunity is highly spatiotemporally regulated and influences a diverse array of host biological systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">He et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tran et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> examined DSF effects on plant growth and PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) responses. It was found that a low concentration of DSF with 5&#x2013;10 &#x3bc;M promoted the primary root growth, while &#x2265; 25 &#x3bc;M of DSF inhibited root elongation in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. It is consistent with the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zhai et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. The promotion of the primary root elongation by 2 &#x3bc;M of DSF was due to the enhancement of cell division in the meristem zone and cell expansion in the elongation zone and involvement with auxin signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zhai et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>DSF measuring 25 &#x3bc;M impaired flg22-elicited stomatal closure, callose deposition, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst. Such dampening of PTI responses was a consequence of a DSF-induced phytosterol production that impaired both clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) for internalizing FLS2 and FLS2 nano-clustering on the cell surface, which therefore desensitized <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> immune responses to the bacterial flagellum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tran et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). A significant reduction of actin assembly was observed after DSF treatment in a dose-dependent manner starting from 25 &#x3bc;M (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). DSF elevated <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> cellulose production, which caused fewer restraints on lateral diffusion and nano-clustering of CW-bound type-1 formin, and thus further led to less actin nucleation during plant&#x2013;bacteria communication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). These pieces of evidence show that DSF-mediated plant&#x2013;bacteria interaction is much more complex. The regulatory mechanism of DSF during the <italic>Xanthomonas</italic>&#x2013;plant interactions remains unclear.</p>
<p>Plant hormones play major roles in the establishment of signaling networks to regulate plant growth and stress-related responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Jasmonic acid (JA)- and salicylic acid (SA)-mediated signaling pathways are mainly related to plant resistance, prompting plant responses to external damage (mechanical, herbivore, and insect damage) and pathogen infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Evidence demonstrates that JA signaling and SA signaling are involved in QS molecule-primed plant immunity. <italic>N</italic>-3-Oxo-tetradecanoyl-<sc>l</sc>-homoserine lactone (3OC14-HSL), one of the QS molecules, was reported to prime plants for cell wall reinforcement and induce resistance to bacterial pathogens <italic>via</italic> the SA/oxylipin pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Schenk et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Another QS molecule, <italic>N</italic>-3-oxo-octanoyl-<sc>l</sc>-homoserine lactone (3OC8-HSL), primes <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> defense response to hemi-biotrophic bacterial infection depending on the SA signaling pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), while it primes <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> resistance against necrotrophic pathogen by coordinating JA and auxin signaling pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Different from a single <italic>N</italic>-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) molecule, the combination of AHL molecules including 3OC14-HSL, <italic>N</italic>-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-<sc>l</sc>-homoserine lactone (3OC10-HSL), 3OC8-HSL, and <italic>N</italic>-3-oxo-hexanoyl-<sc>l</sc>-homoserine lactone (3OC6-HSL) primes <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> defenses <italic>via</italic> JA metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Duan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). A recent study demonstrated that plant SA signal directly acts on the QS system of the invading pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic> to affect its virulence by inducing the turnover of the DSF family QS signal <italic>via</italic> a pH-dependent manner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Song et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). However, the role of plant hormones in DSF-mediated <italic>Xanthomonas</italic>&#x2013;plant interactions and the associated underlying molecular mechanisms are not yet fully understood.</p>
<p>In this study, we examined the effects of DSF on triggering the plant defense responses with a low concentration (0.1&#x2013;10 &#x3bc;M), which was considered as the priming concentration during plant-<italic>Xcc</italic> interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). It was found that 2 &#x3bc;M of DSF could prime plant immunity effectively against <italic>Xcc</italic> in both <italic>Brassica oleracea</italic> and <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>. DSF pretreatment decreased the disease symptoms and <italic>Xcc</italic> proliferation on plant leaves. ROS burst, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation, and antioxidase activation were observed after DSF treatment followed by <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation. Transcriptome combined with metabolome analysis showed that plant hormone JA signaling was involved in DSF-primed resistance to <italic>Xcc</italic> in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. Upregulating gene expression and desensitizing <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> mutants of JA signaling confirmed that DSF-primed resistance against <italic>Xcc</italic> was dependent on the JA pathway. Our findings advanced the understanding of QS signal-mediated communication and provide a new strategy for the control of black rot in <italic>B. oleracea</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Plant materials and growth conditions</title>
<p>
<italic>A. thaliana</italic> (L.) cv. Columbia-0 and the homozygous T-DNA inserted mutants <italic>coi1-1</italic> (CS4144) and <italic>jar1-1</italic> (CS8072) were obtained from The <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> Information Resource (TAIR <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.arabidopsis.org">http://www.arabidopsis.org</ext-link>). <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seeds were surface-sterilized by 75% (v/v) ethanol and 20% (v/v) NaClO and geminated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) Polygel medium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Murashige and Skoog, 1962</xref>) adjusted to pH 5.8. The seeds were stratified at 4&#xb0;C for 2 days and then grown in a growth chamber at 22&#xb0;C &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C and a 16-&#xa0;h light/8-&#xa0;h dark cycle with a light intensity of 120 &#x3bc;mol&#xb7;m<sup>2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. Ten- day-old seedlings grown vertically on MS polygel plates were transplanted into a floating hydroponic system containing sterile Hoagland medium for another 10 days. These seedlings were used for DSF or pathogenic treatments. Fertilized substrate TS1 (Klasmann-Deilmann GmbH, Saterland, Germany) and vermiculite (1:2) were used for soil culture.</p>
<p>Cabbage (<italic>B. oleracea</italic> var. <italic>capitata</italic> L.) seeds were soaked in water until germination and then transplanted into a floating hydroponic system containing sterile MS medium at 25&#xb0;C &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C and under 16/8-h photoperiod (light/dark) with a light intensity of 120 &#x3bc;mol&#xb7;m<sup>2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. Fertilized substrate TS1 (Klasmann-Deilmann GmbH, Germany) and vermiculite (1:1) were used for soil culture.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Bacterial strains and growth conditions</title>
<p>
<italic>X. campestris</italic> pv. <italic>campestris</italic> (<italic>Xcc</italic>) wild-type strain 8004 and its <italic>rpfF</italic> gene deletion mutant strain &#x394;<italic>rpfF</italic> were grown in NYG agar or NYG medium containing 25 &#xb5;g/ml of rifampicin at 28&#xb0;C. <italic>Xcc</italic> was cultured overnight with shaking at 200 rpm, then collected by centrifugation, washed, and re-suspended with 10 mM of sterile MgSO<sub>4</sub>. Bacterial growth was measured in a spectrophotometer at 600 nm. The bacterial inoculum cells were diluted to a final density of 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml by 10 mM of sterile MgSO<sub>4</sub>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>DSF treatment</title>
<p>DSF (<italic>cis</italic>-11-methyl-2-dodecenoic acid) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), stored dry, diluted as 10- mM stock solutions in dH<sub>2</sub>O, and sterilized by passing them through a 0.22-&#xb5;m filter just prior to use. Indicated concentrations of DSF were used as the treatments in our experiments. The untreated plants were taken as the control.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Pathogenicity tests</title>
<p>To inoculate <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> with <italic>Xcc</italic>, the roots of 20-day-old hydroponic seedlings were pretreated with different concentrations (0 nM, 100 nM, 1 &#xb5;M, 2 &#xb5;M, 5 &#xb5;M, and 10 &#xb5;M) of DSF for 48&#xa0;h; then, the leaves were sprayed with 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. After inoculation for 24, 48, and 72&#xa0;h, 100 mg of leaf tissues was harvested and homogenized in 10 mM of MgSO<sub>4</sub>. Then, the homogenate was diluted and plated onto YNG agar medium containing 25 &#xb5;g/ml of rifampicin for colony- forming unit (CFU) counting. Three independent biological experiments were conducted with three technical replications each. Detached leaves from 4-week-old soil-cultured <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seedlings were soaked in sterile dH<sub>2</sub>O or 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h. Then, leaves were placed in sterile Petri dishes containing two layers of moist filter paper to maintain high humidity. Leaves were inoculated with 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic> and cultured at 28&#xb0;C. The disease symptoms were investigated at 72&#xa0;h after inoculation. Sterile dH<sub>2</sub>O treatments were taken as the control. Three independent biological experiments were conducted, and each of them included at least 18 leaves.</p>
<p>Cabbage soil-cultured in four leaves and one shoot period was used for treatments. Two pathogenic inoculation methods were used for cabbage. The suspension inoculation method was performed by making a small cross at the petiole on the back of cabbage leaves and dropping 10 &#xb5;l of bacterial suspension with the cut exposed to air until it is absorbed. The leaf cutting inoculation method was performed by cutting a wound perpendicular to the main vein of the leaf with scissors dipped in the bacterial suspension. Detached leaves were soaked in sterile dH<sub>2</sub>O or 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h, placed in sterile Petri dishes containing two layers of moist filter paper, suspension- inoculated with 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>, and cultured at 28&#xb0;C. CFU counting was conducted at 72&#xa0;h, and the disease symptom was investigated 9 days after inoculation. In the pot experiment, the roots of cabbage were treated with sterile dH<sub>2</sub>O or 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h when the soil was almost dry, and the leaves of cabbage underwent suspension inoculation or leaf cutting inoculation with 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic> and cultured at 28&#xb0;C. The disease symptom was investigated 21 days after inoculation. Sterile dH<sub>2</sub>O treatments were taken as the control. Three or six independent biological experiments were conducted, and each of them included at least eight leaves and six seedlings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>DCFH-DA staining</title>
<p>
<italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seeds were surface-sterilized and geminated on MS Polygel medium for 3&#x2013;5 days. The seedlings were transplanted to 1/2 MS Polygel medium containing 2 &#xb5;M of DSF when the root length was up to 1.5&#x2013;2 cm. DSF-untreated seedlings were taken as the control. After 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48&#xa0;h of treatments, the roots were stained by 10 &#xb5;M of 2&#x2032;,7&#x2032;-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA; Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) for 1&#xa0;h and washed three times by 1/2 MS medium, and then the green fluorescence intensity was examined by a laser scanning confocal microscope (excitation, 488 nm; emission, 500-550 nm; Leica SP8, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany).</p>
<p>To determine H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation induced by DSF, 50 &#xb5;g/ml of catalase (CAT) was used with DSF treatment. DCFH-DA staining was performed, and fluorescence intensity was scanned after 24&#xa0;h of treatment. Three independent experiments were performed with 8&#x2013;19 roots for each treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>DAB staining</title>
<p>Detached leaves of 4-week- old <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 2 days and then inoculated with 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic> for 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48&#xa0;h. Leaves were soaked in 1 mg/ml of 3,3&#x2032;-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and shaken at 80&#x2013;100 rpm for 4&#x2013;8 h at 28&#xb0;C in the dark. Then, 95% ethanol was used to bleach the leaves. DSF-untreated leaves were taken as the control. The experiments were performed three times with six leaves for each treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<title>Hydrogen peroxide determination</title>
<p>Twenty-day- old hydroponic <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seedlings were pretreated with or without 2 &#x3bc;M of DSF in roots for 48&#xa0;h and then spray-inoculated with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic>. Leaves of plants were harvested at 48&#xa0;h after DSF pretreatment and 48&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation. H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> content was determined using a Hydrogen Peroxide assay kit according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions (Solarbio Science &amp; Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> reacts with titanium sulfate to form a yellow titanium peroxide complex, which has characteristic absorption at 665 nm. Three independent biological experiments were conducted with three technical replicates each.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<title>Peroxidase activity determination</title>
<p>Twenty-day- old hydroponic <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seedlings were pretreated with or without 2 &#x3bc;M of DSF in roots for 48&#xa0;h and then spray-inoculated with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic>. Leaves of plants were harvested at 48&#xa0;h after DSF pretreatment and 48&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation. The enzymatic activity of peroxidase (POD) was determined using POD Activity Assay Kit according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions (Solarbio Science &amp; Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Three independent biological experiments were conducted with three technical replicates each.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_9">
<title>RNA-seq</title>
<p>Twenty-day- old hydroponic <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seedlings were pretreated with or without 2 &#x3bc;M of DSF in roots for 48&#xa0;h and then spray-inoculated with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic>. Leaves of plants were harvested at 48&#xa0;h after DSF pretreatment and 48&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation. Total RNA was extracted from treated and control plants using TRIzol<sup>&#xae;</sup> Reagent according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions (Magen). Paired-end libraries were prepared using ABclonal mRNA-seq Lib Prep Kit (ABclonal, Wuhan, China) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The library preparations were sequenced on an Illumina Novaseq 6000, and 150 bp paired-end reads were generated. Raw data of fastq format were first processed through in-house perl scripts by r emoving the adapter sequence and filtering out low- quality and N ratio greater than 5% reads to obtain clean reads that can be used for subsequent analysis. Then, clean reads were separately aligned to the reference genome with orientation mode using HISAT2 software (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://daehwankimlab.github.io/hisat2/">http://daehwankimlab.github.io/hisat2/</ext-link>) to obtain mapped reads. FeatureCounts (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://subread.sourceforge.net/">http://subread.sourceforge.net/</ext-link>) were used to count the read numbers mapped to each gene. Then, the Fragments per Kilobase Million (FRKM) of each gene was calculated based on the length of the gene and the reads count mapped to this gene. Differential expression analysis was performed using the DESeq2 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html">http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html</ext-link>), DEGs with | log2FC | &gt; 1 and p adjust &lt; 0.05 were considered to be significantly differentially expressed genes. ClusterProfiler R software package was used for Gene Ontology (GO) function enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses. When p &lt; 0.05, it is considered that the GO or KEGG function is significantly enriched. The data discussed in this study have been deposited in NCBI&#x2019;s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE229511 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE229511">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE229511</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_10">
<title>Targeted metabolomics analysis and phytohormone determination</title>
<p>Twenty-day- old hydroponic <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seedlings were pretreated with or without 2 &#x3bc;M of DSF in roots for 48&#xa0;h and then spray-inoculated with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic>. Leaves of plants were harvested at 48&#xa0;h after DSF pretreatment and 48&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation. Targeted metabolomics analysis based on multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) technology was performed. Samples were ground using liquid nitrogen, and metabolites were extracted by acetonitrile solution (1%FA). Samples were separated by Agilent 1290 Infinity LC ultra-high- performance liquid chromatography (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The conditions of ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) are as follows: the mobile phase system is 1%FA solution (A) and acetonitrile (B); the chromatographic column is ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 &#x3bc;m, 2.1&#xa0;mm &#xd7; 100&#xa0;mm column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA); column temperature, 40&#xb0;C; liquid velocity, 0.4 ml/min. Gradient eluted program: 0&#x2013;20 min, 0%&#x2013;90%B; 20&#x2013;25 min, 90%B; 25&#x2013;27 min, 90%&#x2013;0%B; 27&#x2013;30 min, 0%B. Mass spectrometric analysis was performed by Thermo Scientific TSQ Quantiva (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The conditions were as follows: sheath gas flow, 30 Arb; auxiliary gas flow, 10 Arb; sweep gas flow, 8 Arb; collision gas, 1.5 mTorr; ion transfer tube temperature, 350&#xb0;C; vaporizer temperature, 300&#xb0;C; spray voltage, 3.0 kV. Thermo Scientific Xcalibur 2.1 software was used for data analysis. The Quantitative results of phytohormones were calculated based on the standard curve.</p>
<p>Samples were harvested at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation in DSF 48 h-pretreated seedlings or non-DSF-pretreated seedlings (taken as the control). The contents of JA and JA-Ile were determined according to the above method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_11">
<title>qRT-PCR</title>
<p>Twenty-day- old hydroponic cultured <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> and cabbage seedlings were treated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48&#xa0;h and then harvested for RNA extraction. Untreated plants were used as controls. Other treatments were that DSF- pretreated seedlings for 48&#xa0;h were inoculated with 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic> for 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48&#xa0;h and then harvested for RNA extraction. DSF-untreated plants were used as controls. Total RNA was extracted using the RNAiso Plus reagent (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScript<sup>&#xae;</sup> RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. SYBR Premix Ex Taq was purchased from TaKaRa (Shiga, Japan). For the relative quantification of gene expression, the comparative CT method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Livak and Schmittgen, 2001</xref>) was used with the 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The amount of target was normalized to the endogenous reference gene <italic>ACTIN2/8</italic> (AT3G18780) in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> and <italic>BoACTIN1</italic> (AF044573) in cabbage. For technical control, each sample was repeated three times on the same 96-well plate. Each data point represents the average of three independent experiments. A 1.5-fold increase (ratio &gt; 1.5) or 1.5-fold decrease (ratio &lt; 0.8) in expression in the treated plants compared with the untreated plants (the control) was considered as upregulation or downregulation, respectively, in relation to DSF response. The specific primers used for qRT-PCR are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_12">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>For all experiments, the overall data were statistically analyzed in the DPS v7.05 program. Univariate and multivariate analyses (ANOVA) with Duncan&#x2019;s new multiple- range tests (p &lt; 0.05) were used. All data were represented as means &#xb1; SD of three or six independent experiments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>DSF protects <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> from <italic>Xcc</italic> infection</title>
<p>The influence of bacterial QS molecule DSF on priming plant defense responses was analyzed. Detached leaves from 3&#x2013;4-week- old soil-cultured <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to spray inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic>. The disease symptoms were observed at 72&#xa0;h after inoculation. The leaves pretreated with DSF exhibited no significant <italic>Xcc</italic> symptoms, while the un-pretreated leaves turned yellow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). To evaluate the dose-dependent induction effects of DSF on <italic>Xcc</italic>, a series concentration of DSF, ranging from 0.1 to 10 &#xb5;M, were used to pretreat the roots of hydroponic <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seedlings for 48&#xa0;h and then spray-inoculated with <italic>Xcc</italic> in leaves. The bacterial CFUs in the leaf tissue were counted at 72&#xa0;h post- inoculation (hpi). Pathogen proliferation was significantly inhibited by 1, 2, and 5 &#xb5;M of DSF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). The optimum concentration of DSF treatment that was screened was 2 &#xb5;M. To monitor the disease progression on the leaves of DSF-pretreated plants, CFUs were monitored for 72&#xa0;h after pathogen infection. While bacterial titer gradually increased in the leaves of <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> without DSF pretreatment, pathogen proliferation was significantly reduced in the DSF-pretreated plants after 48- and 72-&#xa0;h inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref>). The expression of PTI marker genes <italic>WRKY22</italic> and <italic>FRK1</italic> was detected by qPCR in seedlings pretreated by DSF prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> infection. DSF induced the expression of <italic>WRKY22</italic> and <italic>FRK1</italic> to dramatically increase at 48 hpi, and the fold change was up to 5.33 and 4.1, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1D, E</bold>
</xref>). These results indicated that DSF may play an important role in protecting plants from <italic>Xcc</italic> infection.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Enhanced resistance of DSF-treated <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> against <italic>Xcc</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Symptoms of <italic>Xcc</italic> infection on wild-type <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> Col-0 pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF. The disease symptoms were recorded at 72&#xa0;h after inoculation. <bold>(B)</bold> Priming effects of different concentrations of DSF on <italic>Xcc</italic> growth in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. The roots of hydroponically grown plants were pretreated with indicated concentrations of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to foliar inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. CFUs were counted at 72 hpi. <bold>(C)</bold> Inhibitory effect of DSF on <italic>Xcc</italic> growth in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. CFUs were counted at indicated hpi. <bold>(D)</bold> The expression level of PTI marker gene <italic>WRKY22</italic>. <bold>(E)</bold> The expression level of PTI marker <italic>FRK1</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. Samples were harvested at indicated time points for qPCR. Three independent experiments were performed with three replicates in each experiment, and similar results were obtained. Values are means &#xb1; SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA test, *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001). DSF, diffusible signal factor; CFU, colony-forming unit; hpi, post-inoculation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1203582-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In consideration of DSF being the main QS molecule generated by <italic>Xcc</italic>, the <italic>rpfF</italic> gene deletion mutant strain &#x394;<italic>rpfF</italic>, which is not able to produce DSF, was introduced to detect the effect of DSF on priming plant resistance to pathogens. First, exogenous DSF had no influence on bacterial growth in both <italic>Xcc</italic> wild-type strain 8004 and <italic>Xcc</italic>&#x394;<italic>rpfF</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). Pathogen proliferation of <italic>Xcc</italic>&#x394;<italic>rpfF</italic> was also inhibited by exogenous DSF application, which has no difference compared to <italic>Xcc</italic>8004, in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). It indicated that the DSF priming effect was not influenced by endogenous DSF generated by <italic>Xcc</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>DSF elicits ROS burst in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> roots</title>
<p>DCFH-DA probe was used to monitor the oxidation&#x2013;reduction process in cells and detect intracellular ROS production, especially H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, with the intensity of green fluorescence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Lyublinskaya et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The roots of <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> treated with DSF for 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48&#xa0;h were stained by DCFH-DA. An increasing enhancement of green fluorescence was observed along with DSF treatment time extension, while there were no significant changes in the untreated control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). The peak of the intensity of green fluorescence was at 24&#xa0;h after DSF treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>). To test H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation induced by DSF, CAT, one of the main enzymes that catalyze the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide, was applied with DSF treatment for 24&#xa0;h in DCFH-DA staining assay. CAT significantly reduced the intensity of green fluorescence induced by DSF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2C, D</bold>
</xref>). These results suggested that DSF can elicit ROS burst and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of DSF on ROS burst by DCFH-DA staining in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> root. <bold>(A)</bold> Green fluorescence of primary roots in 5-day-old <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> Col-0 seedlings exposed to 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for indicated time. Scale bar = 100 &#x3bc;m. <bold>(B)</bold> Intensity of green fluorescence from panel <bold>(A, C)</bold> CAT effect on fluorescence diminishing; 50 &#x3bc;g/ml of CAT and 2 &#xb5;M of DSF co-treated the roots of 5-day-old <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> seedlings for 24&#xa0;h, and green fluorescence was observed. Scale bar = 100 &#x3bc;m. <bold>(D)</bold> Intensity of green fluorescence from panel <bold>(C)</bold> Three independent experiments were performed and 8&#x2013;19 roots each treatment. Values are means &#xb1; SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA test, **p &lt; 0.01, ****p &lt; 0.0001). DSF, diffusible signal factor; ROS, reactive oxygen species; CAT, catalase.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1203582-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>DSF triggers H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation upon pathogen infection</title>
<p>H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation in leaves was analyzed first by DAB staining. Detached leaves of <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF were stained after <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation at different time points. Brown color in DSF-pretreated leaves was deeper than in un-pretreated leaves after 12 hpi, and the most obvious difference appeared at 24 hpi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). Then, the level of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in leaves was determined by titanium sulfate colorimetry at 24&#xa0;h post <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation. A very strong accumulation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was detected in DSF-pretreated leaves after pathogen infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). Meanwhile, the activity of POD, one of the main H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> scavenging enzymes, also rose rapidly when induced by DSF pretreatment with subsequent pathogen invasion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>). The gene expression of respiratory burst oxidase homolog proteins D and F (<italic>RBOHD</italic> and <italic>RBOHF</italic>) were detected by qPCR in seedlings pretreated by DSF prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> infection. RBOHD and RBOHF were the calcium- dependent NADPH oxidases that play important roles in generating ROS in plant immunity. DSF induced the expression of <italic>RBOHD</italic> and <italic>RBOHF</italic> to increase at 12&#xa0;h after DSF treatment and at 12 and 48&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3D, E</bold>
</xref>). The expression of RBOHF was greatly triggered at 6&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> infection, while there was no significant difference between DSF pretreatment and the un-pretreated control perhaps due to the <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge. These results indicated that DSF pretreatment could trigger RBOH-mediated ROS production when the plant underwent the <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of priming by DSF and pathogen challenge on H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation. <bold>(A)</bold> H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation in leaves stained by diaminobenzidine (DAB). Detached leaves of <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> pretreated with or without 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h and then inoculated with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation. Leaves at indicated hpi were stained by DAB for 24&#xa0;h. After de-staining, the leaves were photographed. The experiments were performed with six leaves per treatment, and similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. <bold>(B)</bold> H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> content in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> leaves. <bold>(C)</bold> POD activity in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> leaves. Control presents the sample with distilled water treatment for 48&#xa0;h. DSF presents DSF treatment for 48&#xa0;h. <italic>Xcc</italic> presents <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation for 48&#xa0;h. DSF+<italic>Xcc</italic> presents DSF pretreatment for 48&#xa0;h followed by <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation for another 48&#xa0;h. Control is the untreated seedlings that grew synchronously with DSF- treated seedlings. <bold>(D)</bold> The expression level of <italic>RBOHD</italic>. <bold>(E)</bold> The expression level of <italic>RBOHF</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. Samples were harvested at indicated time points for qPCR. Values are means &#xb1; SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA test, *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001). DSF, diffusible signal factor; CFU, colony-forming unit; POD, peroxidase; hpi, post-inoculation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1203582-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Transcriptional changes primed by DSF in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>
</title>
<p>To clarify the mechanism of DSF priming the plant immunity against <italic>Xcc</italic>, an RNA sequencing approach was employed to analyze the changes in transcriptomic gene expression in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated by DSF for 48&#xa0;h following <italic>Xcc</italic> infection for another 48&#xa0;h. DSF- untreated seedlings with synchronous growth were taken as blank control, and <italic>Xcc</italic> -inoculated seedlings without DSF pretreatment were taken as pathogen control. A total of 230 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) including 191 upregulated genes and 39 downregulated genes were identified in DSF- treated seedlings compared to untreated control. There were a total of 227 DEGs including 205 genes upregulated and 22 genes downregulated in DSF- pretreated seedlings prior to the <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge compared to <italic>Xcc</italic> -inoculated seedlings without DSF pretreatment. A total of 82 upregulated DEGs were found in both DSF-treated seedlings and DSF-pretreated seedlings with <italic>Xcc</italic> infection. There were no common downregulated DEGs in DSF-treated seedlings and DSF-pretreated seedlings following <italic>Xcc</italic> invasion (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF2">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>To verify the data of RNA-seq, qPCR was used to analyze the gene expression levels of 10 selected DEGs involved in JA signaling, Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling, MAPK signaling, ethylene signaling, auxin signaling, and leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinases. Similar results of up- or down regulation and the fold changes of gene expression were obtained by the qPCR method, which confirmed the reliability of RNA-seq results (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST2">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>To reveal the biological function of DEGs primed by DSF, GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed. The top 10 enrichment terms in Biological Process (BP) were response to wounding, response to JA, JA mediated signaling pathway, cellular response to JA stimulus, regulation of JA mediated signaling pathway, cellular response to hypoxia, to oxygen levels, regulation of response to water deprivation, defense response to insect, and response to chitin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST3">
<bold>Supplementary Tables&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>). In Cellular Component (CC) and Molecular Function (MF), the terms chloroplast membrane and linoleate-13<italic>S</italic>-lipoxygenase activity were enriched (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST3">
<bold>Supplementary Tables&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>). Chloroplast is the main reaction site of JA biosynthesis, and linoleate-13<italic>S</italic>-lipoxygenase is the key enzyme to initiate JA biosynthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). These pieces of evidence suggested that JA signaling might be involved in the DSF priming effect.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Transcriptional changes primed by DSF in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. RNA sequencing was performed. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed between DSF- treated seedlings and untreated control seedlings (DSF <italic>vs.</italic> CK) or DSF- pretreated seedlings followed by <italic>Xcc</italic> infection and <italic>Xcc</italic> -inoculated seedlings without DSF pretreatment (DSF+<italic>Xcc vs. Xcc</italic>). The DEGs were filtered by threshold (p adjust &lt; 0.05, log2foldchange &gt; 1) with three independent replicates. <bold>(A)</bold> GO enrichment (top 20 terms). <bold>(B)</bold> KEGG pathway enrichment (top 9 terms). <bold>(C)</bold> The transcriptional level of JA relative genes upregulated in RNA-seq data and verified by qPCR. RNA-seq values are means of three replicate sample data, and qPCR values are means &#xb1; SD of three independent experiments. Light green indicates the qPCR ratio &#x2248; 1 (no change), medium green indicates 1.5 &lt; qPCR ratio &lt; 2 (slight upregulation), and dark green indicates qPCR ratio &gt; 2 (significant upregulation). DSF, diffusible signal factor; CFU, colony-forming unit; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1203582-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The KEGG pathways that DSF primed include linoleic acid metabolism, alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, plant&#x2013;pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, and MAPK signaling pathway (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST5">
<bold>Supplementary Tables&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST6">
<bold>6</bold>
</xref>). Alpha-linolenic acid, one of the linoleic acids, is the substrate of LOX2 in the initiation of JA biosynthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Alpha-linolenic acid metabolism pathway involved in DSF priming further indicated that JA signaling might be involved in the DSF priming effect.</p>
<p>Upregulated DEGs involved in JA biosynthesis, metabolism, and signaling were confirmed by qPCR. <italic>LOX2</italic>, <italic>LOX3</italic>, <italic>LOX4</italic>, and 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 3 (<italic>OPR3</italic>) belong to JA biosynthesis genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). <italic>LOX3</italic>, <italic>LOX4</italic>, and <italic>OPR3</italic> were induced significantly by DSF treatment, while the expression of <italic>LOX2</italic>, <italic>LOX3</italic>, and <italic>LOX4</italic> was more increased induced by DSF after the <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref>). JA metabolism genes include <italic>Cytochrome P450 94B3</italic> (<italic>CYP94B3</italic>) and <italic>CYP94C1</italic>, which catalyzed JA-Ile into 12-OH-JA and 12-COOH-JA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Enhanced expression of these two genes was observed in seedlings pretreated by DSF prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref>). JA signaling genes such as <italic>JAZ10</italic>, <italic>JAZ13</italic>, and <italic>VSP2</italic> were also induced greatly by DSF after <italic>Xcc</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref>). These consistent results suggested that JA signaling may be involved in the DSF priming process.</p>
<p>In addition, hypoxia response, calcium ion binding, heterotrimeric G protein, MAPK signaling, and carotenoid biosynthesis (ABA biosynthesis relevance) were also enriched in GO and KEGG analyses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A, B</bold>
</xref>). It was suggested that DSF might play a role in these areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Metabolomics analysis and phytohormone changes primed by DSF</title>
<p>To further investigate the mechanism of DSF priming the plant immunity against pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic>, metabolomics analysis was used, and the level of phytohormones was determined in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated by DSF for 48&#xa0;h following <italic>Xcc</italic> infection for another 48&#xa0;h. DSF- untreated seedlings with synchronous growth were taken as blank control, and <italic>Xcc</italic> -inoculated seedlings without DSF pretreatment were taken as pathogen control. The contents of 13 phytohormones were determined including SA, abscisic acid (ABA), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), indoleacetic acid (IAA), JA, JA-isoleucine conjugate (JA-Ile), 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (<italic>cis</italic>-OPDA), <italic>N</italic>
<sup>6</sup>-dimethylallyladenine (iP), <italic>N</italic>
<sup>6</sup>-dimethylallyladenine riboside (iPR), trans-zeatin (tZ), zeatin (cZ), trans-zeatin riboside (tzR), and zeatin riboside (czR). Most hormones were not induced by DSF except iP and iPR (downregulation) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5H, I</bold>
</xref>). However, when <italic>Xcc</italic> infected the seedlings, the level of JA, an important defensive hormone, and its amino acid derivative JA-Ile increased, sharply triggered by DSF pretreatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A, B</bold>
</xref>). ABA and zeatin biosynthesis hormones tZ and cZ were also promoted by DSF in <italic>Xcc</italic> -challenged seedlings, while IAA and iPR were decreased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5D&#x2013;G, I</bold>
</xref>). Another important defensive hormone SA was elevated by <italic>Xcc</italic> invasion but was not affected by DSF pretreatment (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF3">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). The content of <italic>cis</italic>-OPDA, the precursor of JA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Taki et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>), was also insensitive to DSF treatment whether or not in the <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge condition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>). Other phytohormones including ACC, tZR, and cZR were not influenced by DSF and <italic>Xcc</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF3">
<bold>Supplementary Figures&#xa0;3B&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Metabolomics changes primed by DSF in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. Phytohormones were extracted to test the level changes between DSF treatment and untreated control (48&#xa0;h) or between DSF pretreatment and un-pretreatment prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> infection (48 hpi). <bold>(A)</bold> JA, <bold>(B)</bold> JA-Ile, <bold>(C)</bold> <italic>cis</italic>-OPDA, <bold>(D)</bold> ABA, <bold>(E)</bold> tZ, <bold>(F)</bold> cZ, <bold>(G)</bold> IAA, <bold>(H)</bold> iP, and <bold>(I)</bold> iPR. Values are means of three duplicate sample data. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA test, *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001). DSF, diffusible signal factor; CFU, colony-forming unit; hpi, post-inoculation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1203582-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<title>DSF primes JA accumulation by eliciting JA synthesis gene expression</title>
<p>To further verify the effects of DSF on JA accumulation, the content of JA was determined at different times after <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. <italic>Xcc</italic> triggered the level of JA to rise rapidly when inoculation time was &#x2265; 6 hpi. DSF pretreatment also elicited JA concentration to rise simultaneously but had no significant difference when compared to the <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge only. At 48 hpi, the priming effect of DSF on promoting JA accumulation was remarkable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>). JA-Ile is the most bioactive form of JAs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Fonseca et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). The effect of DSF on JA-Ile was similar to that of JA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of priming by DSF and pathogen challenge on JA accumulation. The seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. Samples were harvested at indicated time points. <bold>(A)</bold> The content of JA. <bold>(B)</bold> The content of JA-Ile. <bold>(C&#x2013;F)</bold> Expression of JA synthesis genes <italic>LOX2</italic>, <italic>AOS</italic>, <italic>AOC2</italic>, and <italic>OPR3</italic>. <bold>(G)</bold> The expression of JA-Ile synthesis gene <italic>JAR1</italic>. <bold>(H)</bold> The expression of JA transporter gene <italic>JAT1</italic>. Values are means &#xb1; SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA test, *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001). DSF, diffusible signal factor; CFU, colony-forming unit.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1203582-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>, three enzymes in chloroplast are required including lipoxygenase (LOX), allene oxide synthase (AOS), and allene oxide cyclase (AOC) in JA biosynthesis pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The gene expression of <italic>LOX2</italic>, <italic>AOS</italic>, and <italic>AOC2</italic> was detected by qPCR in seedlings pretreated by DSF prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> infection. DSF induced <italic>LOX2</italic> upregulation dramatically at 12 hpi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>). At 12 and 48 hpi, the expression of <italic>AOS</italic> and <italic>AOC2</italic> was also increased by DSF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6D, E</bold>
</xref>). OPR3 catalyzes OPDA and subsequently with three rounds of &#x3b2;-oxidation to yield JA [(+)-7-iso-JA] (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Liu and Timko, 2021</xref>). <italic>OPR3</italic> was induced by DSF at 24 and 48&#xa0;h after DSF treatment and subsequently with the <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6F</bold>
</xref>). Jasmonoyl-isoleucine synthetase (JAR1) catalyzes the conjugation of JA to the amino acid isoleucine to form JA-Ile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Fonseca et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). The expression of <italic>JAR1</italic> was increased significantly by DSF at 24 and 48&#xa0;h prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> infection and at 48&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6G</bold>
</xref>). The ABC transporter JAT1 with JA transport ability mediates the bioactive JA-Ile across the inner membrane of the nuclear to activate JA responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The expression of <italic>JAT1</italic> was increased significantly by DSF at 24 and 48&#xa0;h prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> infection and at 12 and 48&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6H</bold>
</xref>). These results indicated that DSF promotes JA and JA-Ile accumulation in plant cells by eliciting the expression of JA synthesis and transport genes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_7">
<title>DSF modulated the expression of JA signaling genes</title>
<p>Coronatine insensitive 1 (COI1) and jasmonate ZIM-domain protein (JAZ) are coreceptors of JA signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Sheard et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor MYC2 is a well-known regulatory protein of JA signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). DSF pretreatment elicited the expression level of <italic>JAZ1</italic> to rise at 24 and 48 hpi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7A</bold>
</xref>). The transcriptional level of <italic>MYC2</italic> was promoted by DSF at 6 and 12 hpi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>). The expression of <italic>COI1</italic> was not influenced by DSF pretreatment following <italic>Xcc</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7C</bold>
</xref>). The expression of JA-responsive marker genes <italic>VSP2</italic>, <italic>PDF1.2</italic>, and <italic>Thi2.1</italic> was detected in seedlings pretreated by DSF prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> infection. VSP2 has acid phosphatase activity dependent on the presence of a divalent cation. <italic>PDF1.2</italic> encodes ethylene- and JA-responsive plant defense. <italic>Thi2.1</italic> encodes a thionin, which is a cysteine-rich protein having antimicrobial properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The expression levels of <italic>VSP2</italic>, <italic>PDF1.2</italic>, and <italic>Thi2.1</italic> were induced by DSF treatment slightly and increased dramatically at 12&#xa0;h after <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation in seedlings primed with DSF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7D&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>). These results indicated that DSF primed plant resistance against <italic>Xcc</italic> by activating the expression of JA signaling genes.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Expression of JA signaling genes primed by DSF with <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. Samples were harvested at indicated time points for qPCR. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> Expression of JA signaling transcriptional regulator genes <italic>JAZ1</italic>, <italic>MYC2</italic>, and <italic>COI1</italic>. <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> Expression of JA signaling downstream cascade genes <italic>VSP2</italic>, <italic>PDF1.2</italic>, and <italic>Thi2.1</italic>. Values are means &#xb1; SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA test, *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001). DSF, diffusible signal factor; CFU, colony-forming unit.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1203582-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_8">
<title>The DSF priming effect is absent in JA signaling mutants <italic>coi1-1</italic> and <italic>jar1-1</italic>
</title>
<p>To further investigate the role of JA signaling in DSF- primed resistance to <italic>Xcc</italic>, two functional defective mutants <italic>coi1-1</italic> and <italic>jar1-1</italic> were employed for comparison with wild-type Col-0. COI1 is the JA signaling receptor, and <italic>coi1-1</italic> is defective in JA perception (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). JAR1 plays an important role in transforming JA into bioactive JA-Ile, and <italic>jar1-1</italic> is defective in the synthesis of JA-Ile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chini et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). JA-Ile binds with the COI1-JAZ complex to activate JA signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). DSF pretreatment could relieve the <italic>Xcc</italic> disease symptoms in detached leaves of wild-type <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> Col-0, while the priming- resistant effect of DSF was not observed in mutants <italic>coi1-1</italic> and <italic>jar1-1</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8A</bold>
</xref>). Consistently, there was no significant difference in the <italic>Xcc</italic> proliferation levels between DSF- pretreated seedlings and un-pretreated ones in <italic>coi1-1</italic> and <italic>jar1-1</italic>, while a reduction of bacterial proliferation was observed in wild-type seedlings pretreated by DSF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8B</bold>
</xref>). Unlike wild-type Col-0, the expression of JA- responsive genes <italic>VSP2</italic> and <italic>PDF1.2</italic> only increased slightly, while the expression of <italic>Thi2.1</italic> was not increased by DSF in mutant <italic>coi1-1</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;8C&#x2013;E</bold>
</xref>). The expression levels of these three JA- responsive genes were also not increased by DSF pretreatment prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> infection in mutant <italic>jar1-1</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;8F&#x2013;H</bold>
</xref>). These results indicated that the synthesis and perception of the bioactive JA-Ile were required for the DSF priming process.</p>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Desensitization of priming effects elicited by DSF and <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge in JA signaling mutants <italic>coi1-1</italic> and <italic>jar1-1</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Symptoms of <italic>Xcc</italic> infection on <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> mutants <italic>coi1-1</italic> and <italic>jar1-1</italic> pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF. The disease symptoms were recorded at 72&#xa0;h after inoculation. <bold>(B)</bold> Proliferation of <italic>Xcc</italic> in the leaves of wild-type <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> Col-0 and mutants <italic>coi1-1</italic> and <italic>jar1-1</italic> at 48 hpi. <bold>(C&#x2013;E)</bold> Expression of JA- responsive genes <italic>VSP2</italic>, <italic>PDF1.2</italic>, and <italic>Thi2.1</italic> in mutant <italic>coi1-1</italic>. <bold>(F&#x2013;H)</bold> Expression of JA- responsive genes <italic>VSP2</italic>, <italic>PDF1.2</italic>, and <italic>Thi2.1</italic> in mutant <italic>jar1-1</italic>. Values are means &#xb1; SD of three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA test, *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ****p &lt; 0.0001). DSF, diffusible signal factor; CFU, colony-forming unit; hpi, post-inoculation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1203582-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_9">
<title>DSF primes resistance against <italic>Xcc</italic> in cabbage (<italic>B. oleracea</italic> L.)</title>
<p>To explore the priming effects of DSF against black rot in <italic>B. oleracea</italic>, detached leaves and soil-cultured pot seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h and then inoculated with 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic> by suspension inoculation method and leaf cutting inoculation method. The disease symptoms were observed after 9 days in detached leaves and 21 days in pot seedlings. The leaves infected by <italic>Xcc</italic> showed a typical black rot symptom with a filemot necrotic lesion, while DSF- pretreated leaves exhibited no significant <italic>Xcc</italic> symptoms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9A</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF4">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). <italic>Xcc</italic> proliferation in <italic>B. oleracea</italic> leaves was significantly inhibited by DSF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9B</bold>
</xref>). It indicated that DSF plays an important role in priming <italic>B. oleracea</italic> resistance against pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic>.</p>
<fig id="f9" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;9</label>
<caption>
<p>Enhanced resistance of DSF-treated cabbage against <italic>Xcc</italic>. The seedlings were pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF for 48&#xa0;h prior to inoculation with 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/ml of <italic>Xcc</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Symptoms of <italic>Xcc</italic> infection on cabbage pretreated with 2 &#xb5;M of DSF in pot-cultured seedlings. The disease symptoms were recorded 21 days after inoculation. <bold>(B)</bold> Proliferation of <italic>Xcc</italic> in the leaves of cabbage at 48 hpi. <bold>(C, D)</bold> Expression of JA synthesis genes <italic>BoLOX</italic> and <italic>BoAOS</italic>. <bold>(E, F)</bold> Expression of JA regulator genes <italic>BoJAZ1</italic> and <italic>BoMYC2</italic>. <bold>(G)</bold> The expression of JA- responsive gene <italic>BoVSP</italic>. <bold>(H)</bold> The expression of JA-Ile synthesis gene <italic>BoJAR1</italic>. Values are means &#xb1; SD of three or six independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (ANOVA test, *p &lt; 0.05, **p &lt; 0.01, ***p &lt; 0.001, ****p &lt; 0.0001). DSF, diffusible signal factor; CFU, colony-forming unit; hpi, post-inoculation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fcimb-13-1203582-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In view of DSF priming plant resistance dependent on the JA signaling pathway in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>, JA signaling orthologues were detected in <italic>B. oleracea</italic>. JA biosynthesis genes <italic>BoLOX</italic> and <italic>BoAOS</italic> were strongly induced by DSF, especially when they underwent pathogen <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge at 6 hpi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;9C, D</bold>
</xref>). The expression of JA signaling transcriptional regulator genes <italic>BoMYC2</italic> and <italic>BoJAZ1</italic> were also increased by DSF whether or not under <italic>Xcc</italic> infection condition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;9E, F</bold>
</xref>). <italic>BoVSP</italic>, one of the JA- responsive genes, was all upregulated drastically by DSF with fold change of up to 100 when DSF was treated at 12&#xa0;h and DSF-pretreated prior to <italic>Xcc</italic> invasion at 6 and 24 hpi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9G</bold>
</xref>). <italic>BoJAR1</italic>, which functions on JA-Ile synthesis, was induced significantly by DSF under the <italic>Xcc</italic> challenge (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9H</bold>
</xref>). These results suggested that JA signaling may be involved in DSF- primed <italic>B. oleracea</italic> resistance against <italic>Xcc</italic>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Plants and bacteria have co-existed for millions of years, and complex networks consisting of different signaling molecules have evolved. QS is one of the best-studied cell&#x2013;cell communication modes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">He et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Accumulating evidence suggests that QS signaling molecules such as DSF mediate not only intraspecies communication and interspecies communication within microbes but also inter-kingdom communication between DSF-producing bacteria and their eukaryotic hosts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tran et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zhai et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">He et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref> reported that DSF signal induced innate immunity against pathogen infection in a dose-dependent manner in <italic>N. benthamiana</italic>, <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>, and rice. High dose of DSF (&#x2265;100 &#x3bc;M) induced HR-like symptoms, callose deposition, programmed cell death, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation, and <italic>PR-1</italic> gene expression, while a low dose of DSF (&#x2264;10 &#x3bc;M) did not induce a significant amount of callose deposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tran et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> found that 25 &#x3bc;M of DSF, mimicking early-infection concentrations, hijacked <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> sterol biosynthesis, thereby suppressing PTI responses, including callose deposition, ROS production, and stomatal closure. However, pre-infiltration with 10 &#x3bc;M of DSF and subsequent challenge with flg22 caused a substantial amount of callose deposition, which suggested that the application of a lower concentration of DSF may prime plants and influence their subsequent defense response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kakkar et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). In this study, we demonstrated that DSF could prime plant immunity effectively against <italic>Xcc</italic> in both <italic>A. thaliana</italic> and <italic>B. oleracea</italic> with a low concentration (1&#x2013;5 &#x3bc;M) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>9</bold>
</xref>). It was found that 2 &#x3bc;M of DSF pretreatment decreased the disease symptoms and <italic>Xcc</italic> proliferation on plant leaves and upregulated the transcriptional level of PTI marker genes <italic>WRKY22</italic> and <italic>FRK1</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>9</bold>
</xref>). These results indicated that DSF plays an important role in priming plant resistance against the <italic>Xcc</italic> pathogen and that the concentration of 2 &#x3bc;M was the optimized dose of DSF to prime plant immunity.</p>
<p>ROS production is critical for plant development, growth, and response to abiotic and biotic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Plant NADPH oxidases, the respiratory burst oxidase homologs (RBOHs), which generate superoxide anions (<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) in the apoplast that rapidly dismutated to H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, are a major source of ROS during plant&#x2013;microbe interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Otulak-Kozie&#x142; et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). RBOHD and RBOHF are pleiotropic and function together, contributing to stress signaling, especially pathogen response differentially modulating the immune response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Morales et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). In this study, DSF treatment elicited ROS burst in the <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> root, and CAT application proved that the cellular level of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> was elevated mainly by DSF (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). ROS burst, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulation, antioxidase POD activation, and <italic>RBOHD/F</italic> upregulation were observed after DSF treatment followed by <italic>Xcc</italic> inoculation in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> leaves (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). These pieces of evidence indicated that RBOH-mediated ROS production plays an important role in DSF-primed plant resistance.</p>
<p>JA and its metabolic derivatives, such as JA-Ile and methyl jasmonate (MeJA), collectively known as jasmonates (JAs), are a class of lipid-derived, natural, and widely distributed phytohormones in higher plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Liu and Timko, 2021</xref>). JA and its derivatives are key signaling compounds closely related to plant defense and resistance to microbial pathogens, herbivorous insects, wounding, light, drought, salt, ozone stress, and low temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Rao et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Balbi and Devoto, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Glauser et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Mewis et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Ellouzi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>, there are three pathways for the synthesis of JAs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chini et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Liu and Timko, 2021</xref>). The octadecane pathway starting from &#x3b1;-linolenic acid (&#x3b1;-LeA, 18:3) was the main pathway. Through a sequential series of reactions catalyzed by LOX, AOS, and AOC, &#x3b1;-LeA is converted to OPDA. Then, OPDA is transported from chloroplast to peroxisome, where it is reduced by OPR3 and subsequently shortened by three rounds of &#x3b2;-oxidation, finally yielding JA [(+)-7-iso-JA] (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Liu and Timko, 2021</xref>). In the cytoplasm, JA is metabolized into different structures by various chemical reactions, such as MeJA, JA-Ile, <italic>cis</italic>-jasmone (CJ), and 12-hydroxyjasmonic acid (12-OH-JA), and <italic>JAR1</italic>, <italic>CYP94B3</italic>, and <italic>CYP94C1</italic> are involved in this process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). JAT1 mediated the bioactive JA-Ile transport quickly into the nucleus when the plant is under stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). COI1-JAZ complex is a high-affinity receptor for the bioactive JA-Ile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Sheard et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). COI1 associates with the SKP1 protein and Cullin protein to form the SCF-type E3 ubiquitin ligase SCF<sup>COI1</sup>, which targets JAZ for degradation by ubiquitination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Zhai et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Subsequently, JAZ proteins are degraded after being transferred to the 26S proteasome, and simultaneously, transcription factors such as MYC2 are released to activate the expression of downstream genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In this study, transcriptome combined with metabolome analysis showed that plant hormone JA signaling was involved in DSF-primed resistance to <italic>Xcc</italic> in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>5</bold>
</xref>). Biosynthesis, metabolism, and signaling genes of JA including <italic>LOX</italic>, <italic>JAZ</italic>, <italic>VSP2</italic>, <italic>CYP94B3</italic>, and <italic>CYP94C1</italic> were induced by DSF priming following <italic>Xcc</italic> invasion (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>6</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>7</bold>
</xref>). <italic>LOX2</italic>, <italic>AOS</italic>, <italic>AOC2</italic>, <italic>JAR1</italic>, <italic>JAT1</italic>, <italic>JAZ1</italic>, and <italic>MYC2</italic> were all induced in the DSF priming process in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> and cabbage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>7</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>9</bold>
</xref>). Elevated JA and JA-Ile hormone levels and desensitizing of JA signaling mutants <italic>coi1-1</italic> and <italic>jar1-1</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>8</bold>
</xref>) confirmed that DSF-primed resistance against <italic>Xcc</italic> was dependent on the JA pathway.</p>
<p>DSF-producing phytopathogens or plant-associated bacteria use DSF signals to affect host cell biology through multilayered regulatory networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">He et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The regulatory mechanism of DSF during the <italic>Xanthomonas</italic>&#x2013;plant interactions is far from clear. The role of JA and JA derivatives in DSF-mediated <italic>Xanthomonas</italic>&#x2013;plant interactions needs further study. JA signaling crosstalk with other phytohormones such as SA, auxin, ABA, and zeatin in DSF priming plant immunity needs more investigation. Moreover, the role of calcium signaling, G protein signaling, and MAPK signaling in DSF-mediated <italic>Xanthomonas</italic>&#x2013;plant interactions is also the direction of further research. Understanding the mechanisms of QS signal-mediated communication has important implications for appreciating host&#x2013;pathogen interactions and providing new strategies for the control of plant disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="s10">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>QZ and SS drafted the manuscript. QZ, FL, and CS performed the plant pathology analysis, molecular analysis, and genetic assay, respectively. TZ, ZH, LM, XZ, and ZJ helped with the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work. SS was responsible for the design of the work. All authors gave approval to the final version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was financially supported by a project from the Central Guidance on Local Science and Technology Development Fund of Hebei Province (226Z6501G), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31601144), the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2015CB150604), and the Science and Technology project of Hebei Academy of Sciences (22304).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We would like to thank Yantao Jia (Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences in China) for providing the black rot pathogen <italic>Xcc8004</italic> and mutant strain <italic>Xcc&#x394;rpfF</italic>, and the seeds of <italic>B. oleracea</italic> (Jingfeng No. 1).</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1203582/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2023.1203582/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.pdf" id="SF1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_2.pdf" id="SF2" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_3.pdf" id="SF3" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_4.pdf" id="ST1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_5.pdf" id="SF4" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_6.pdf" id="ST2" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_7.pdf" id="ST7" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_3.xlsx" id="ST3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet">
<label>Supplementary Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>DSF_vs_CK.DEG_GO_enriched_result (padjust 0.05).</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_4.xlsx" id="ST4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet">
<label>Supplementary Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>DSF-Xcc_vs_CK-Xcc.DEG_GO_enriched_result (padjust 0.05).</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_5.xlsx" id="ST5" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet">
<label>Supplementary Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>DSF_vs_CK.DEG_KEGG_enriched_result.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_6.xlsx" id="ST6" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet">
<label>Supplementary Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>DSF-X_vs_CK-X.DEG_KEGG_enriched_result.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balbi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devoto</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Jasmonate signalling network in arabidopsis thaliana: crucial regulatory nodes and new physiological scenarios</article-title>. <source>New Phytologist.</source> <volume>177</volume>, <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>318</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02292.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barber</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>M. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>T. J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slater</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>A novel regulatory system required for pathogenicity of <italic>Xanthomonas campestris</italic> is mediated by a small diffusible signal molecule</article-title>. <source>Mol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>555</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>566</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.3721736.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fonseca</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adie</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chico</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lorenzo</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>448</volume>, <fpage>666</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>671</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature06006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Monte</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zamarre&#xf1;o</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lassueur</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reymond</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>An OPR3-independent pathway uses 4, 5-didehydrojasmonate for jasmonate synthesis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Chem. Biol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nchembio.2540</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grimm</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ponath</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reichelt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mith&#xf6;fer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Combination of bacterial n-acyl homoserine lactones primes arabidopsis defenses <italic>via</italic> jasmonate metabolism</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>191</volume>, <fpage>2027</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2044</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/plphys/kiad017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ellouzi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamed</surname> <given-names>K. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cela</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xfc;ller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdelly</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munn&#xe9;-Bosch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Increased sensitivity to salt stress in tocopherol-deficient arabidopsis mutants growing in a hydroponic system</article-title>. <source>Plant Signal Behav.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <elocation-id>e23136</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4161/psb.23136</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fonseca</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adie</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porzel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kramell</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>(+)-7-iso-Jasmonoyl- l-isoleucine is the endogenous bioactive jasmonate</article-title>. <source>Nat. Chem. Biol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>344</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>350</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nchembio.161</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Glauser</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grata</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubugnon</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rudaz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farmer</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wolfender</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Spatial and temporal dynamics of jasmonate synthesis and accumulation in arabidopsis in response to wounding</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>283</volume>, <fpage>16400</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16407</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M801760200</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chatterjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>DSF-family quorum sensing signal-mediated intraspecies, interspecies, and inter-kingdom communication</article-title>. <source>Trends Microbiol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2022.07.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kakkar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nizampatnam</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kondreddy</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pradhan</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chatterjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Xanthomonas campestris</italic> cell-cell signaling molecule DSF (diffusible signal factor) elicits innate immunity in plants and is suppressed by the exopolysaccharide xanthan</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>6697</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6714</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erv377</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Diffusible signal factor (DSF)-mediated quorum sensing modulates expression of diverse traits in <italic>Xanthomonas citri</italic> and responses of citrus plants to promote disease</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-018-5384-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Metabolism, signaling, and transport of jasmonates</article-title>. <source>Plant Commun.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <elocation-id>100231</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100231</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Timko</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Jasmonic acid signaling and molecular crosstalk with other phytohormones</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <elocation-id>2914</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms22062914</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>
<italic>N</italic>-3-oxo-octanoyl-homoserine lactone-mediated priming of resistance to <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> requires the salicylic acid signaling pathway in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>
</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>38</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-019-2228-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>
<italic>N</italic>-3-oxo-octanoyl homoserine lactone primes plant resistance against necrotrophic pathogen <italic>Pectobacterium carotovorum</italic> by coordinating jasmonic acid and auxin-signaling pathways</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.886268</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Livak</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmittgen</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-DeltaDeltaC(T)) method</article-title>. <source>Methods</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>408</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/meth.2001.1262</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lyublinskaya</surname> <given-names>O. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ivanova</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pugovkina</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kozhukharova</surname> <given-names>I. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kovaleva</surname> <given-names>Z. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shatrova</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Redox environment in stem and differentiated cells: a quantitative approach</article-title>. <source>Redox Biol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>758</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>769</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.redox.2017.04.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nath</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Formin nanoclustering-mediated actin assembly during plant flagellin and DSF signaling</article-title>. <source>Cell Rep.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <elocation-id>108884</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108884</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mewis</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schreiner</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krumbein</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ulrichs</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lohse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>UV-B irradiation changes specifically the secondary metabolite profile in broccoli sprouts: induced signaling overlaps with defense response to biotic stressors</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Physiol.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>1546</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1560</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcs096</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roby</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arlat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kroj</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Optimization of pathogenicity assays to study the <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>&#x2013;<italic>Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris</italic> pathosystem</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>333</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00287.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morales</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kadota</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zipfel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Molina</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The arabidopsis NADPH oxidases rbohd and rbohf display differential expression patterns and contributions during plant immunity</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1663</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1676</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erv558</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Murashige</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skoog</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1962</year>). <article-title>A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>497</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Otulak-Kozie&#x142;</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kozie&#x142;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bujarski</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frankowska-&#x141;ukawska</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Respiratory burst oxidase homologs RBOHD and RBOHF as key modulating components of response in turnip mosaic virus-<italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> (L.) heyhn system</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <elocation-id>8510</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms21228510</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Creelman</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mullet</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Jasmonic acid signaling modulates ozone-induced hypersensitive cell death</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1633</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1646</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.12.9.1633</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou.</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khurshid</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Jasmonic acid signaling pathway in plants</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <elocation-id>2479</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms20102479</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schenk</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hern&#xe1;ndez-Reyes</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samans</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stein</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neumann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schikora</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>
<italic>N</italic>-acyl-homoserine lactone primes plants for cell wall reinforcement and induces resistance to bacterial pathogens <italic>via</italic> the salicylic acid/oxylipin pathway</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>2708</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2723</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.114.126763</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sheard</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Withers</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ben-Nissan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hinds</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Jasmonate perception by inositolphosphate-potentiated COI1-JAZ co-receptor</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>468</volume>, <fpage>400</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>405</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature09430</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen.</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The plant defense signal salicylic acid activates the RpfB dependent quorum sensing signal turnover <italic>via</italic> altering the culture and cytoplasmic pH in the phytopathogen <italic>Xanthomonas campestris</italic>
</article-title>. <source>mBio</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>2</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mbio.03644-21</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Taki</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasaki-Sekimoto</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Obayashi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kikuta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kobayashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ainai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>12-oxo-phytodienoic acid triggers expression of a distinct set of genes and plays a role in wound-induced gene expression in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>139</volume>, <fpage>1268</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1283</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.105.067058</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Triebl</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nath</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>B. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The bacterial quorum sensing signal DSF hijacks arabidopsis thaliana sterol biosynthesis to suppress plant innate immunity</article-title>. <source>Life Sci. Alliance</source> <volume>3</volume>, <elocation-id>e202000720</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26508/lsa.202000720</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Role of plant respiratory burst oxidase homologs in stress responses</article-title>. <source>Free Radic. Res.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>826</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>839</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10715762.2018.1473572</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Jasmonate action in plant defense against insects</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>3391</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3400</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erz174</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The crosstalks between jasmonic acid and other plant hormone signaling highlight the involvement of jasmonic acid as a core component in plant response to biotic and abiotic stresses</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.01349</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Auxin signaling pathway is involved in the regulation of root growth by bacterial quorum sensing molecule DSF in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. J.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>1724</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1734</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.100111</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Transcriptional mechanism of jasmonate receptor COI1-mediated delay of flowering time in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2814</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2828</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.15.00619</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuang</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>K. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Induction of jasmonate signaling regulators MaMYC2s and their physical interactions with MaICE1 in methyl jasmonate-induced chilling tolerance in banana fruit</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02551.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Bacterial quorum sensing signal DSF inhibits LPS-induced inflammations by suppressing toll-like receptor signaling and preventing lysosome mediated apoptosis in zebrafish</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <elocation-id>7110</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms23137110</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>