Introduction

Front. Cell Dev. Biol.

Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

Front. Cell Dev. Biol.

2296-634X

Frontiers Media S.A.

847761

10.3389/fcell.2022.847761

Cell and Developmental Biology

Review

Roles of Embryonic Lethal Abnormal Vision-Like RNA Binding Proteins in Cancer and Beyond

Cai et al.

ELAVL Proteins in Cancer

Cai

Haijian

^† Zheng

Dandan

^† Yao

Yizhu

Yang

Lehe

* Huang

Xiaoying

* Wang

Liangxing

The First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

Edited by: Alexander Brodsky, Lifespan, United States

Reviewed by: Greco Hernández, National Institute of Cancerology (INCAN), Mexico

Ihab Younis, Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar, Qatar

*Correspondence: Lehe Yang, yanglehe@wmu.edu.cn; Xiaoying Huang, zjwzhxy@126.com; Liangxing Wang, wangliangxing@wzhospital.cn ^†

These authors have contributed equally to this work

This article was submitted to Molecular and Cellular Pathology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology

06 04 2022

2022

847761

03 01 2022 04 03 2022

2022

Cai, Zheng, Yao, Yang, Huang and Wang

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Embryonic lethal abnormal vision-like (ELAVL) proteins are RNA binding proteins that were originally discovered as indispensable regulators of the development and functioning of the nervous system. Subsequent studies have shown that ELAVL proteins not only exist in the nervous system, but also have regulatory effects in other tissues. ELAVL proteins have attracted attention as potential therapeutic targets because they stabilize multiple mRNAs by binding within the 3′-untranslated region and thus promote the development of tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, colorectal carcinoma and lung cancer. Previous studies have focused on these important relationships with downstream mRNAs, but emerging studies suggest that ELAVL proteins also interact with non-coding RNAs. In this review, we will summarize the relationship of the ELAVL protein family with mRNA and non-coding RNA and the roles of ELAVL protein family members in a variety of physiological and pathological processes.

ELAVL proteins RNA binding proteins non-coding RNAs post-transcriptional regulation cancers

82170061 82170062

National Natural Science Foundation of China10.13039/501100001809

Introduction

The embryonic lethal abnormal vision-like (ELAVL) proteins in fish, frogs, and mammals are defined as RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), and they play important roles in post-transcriptional regulation (Campos et al., 1985). ELAVL proteins were first discovered in Drosophila due to their ability to interact with AU-rich element (ARE)-containing transcripts (Campos et al., 1985). Each member of the ELAVL protein family, which includes ELAVL1-4 (HuR HuB, HuC, HuD) (Figure 1), consists of three similar and conserved RNA recognition motifs (RRM) (Toba and White, 2008; Colombrita et al., 2013). The sequence of a hinge region between RRMs 2 and 3 differs among the four family members (Good, 1995), and its presence is key to the ability of these proteins to shuttle into and out of the nucleus (Fan and Steitz, 1998a).

FIGURE 1

Structure of the human ELAVL proteins. Each ELAVL protein consists of three similar and conserved RNA recognition motifs (RRMs). The numbers indicate amino acid positions.

Biologically, ELAVL proteins were originally discovered as indispensable regulators of nervous system development and physiological function (Rogulja-Ortmann et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2019a; Zhao et al., 2020a). Interestingly, subsequent studies have shown that they not only exist in the nervous system, but also have regulatory effects in other tissues, including hepatocytes (Wang et al., 2021), fat cells (Siang et al., 2020), vascular smooth muscle cells (Liu et al., 2020a), and intestinal epithelial cells (Liu et al., 2019).

Previous studies have mainly focused on the relationship between ELAVL proteins and downstream mRNA transcripts, and less attention has been paid to interactions between ELAVLs and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) molecules. The regulation and metabolism of ncRNA is an emerging research topic, and ncRNAs have been shown to play important roles in a variety of fields, such as cancer (Deschenes-Furry et al., 2007; Schultz et al., 2020), inflammation (Wen et al., 2021), and cell differentiation (Chen et al., 2021a). This review aims to summarize relationships of the ELAVL family of proteins with mRNAs and ncRNAs and the regulation of ELAVL family proteins in various physiological and pathological processes.

Members of the ELAVL Family

ELAVL1, also known as human antigen R (HuR), has been established as a tumor-specific antigen in colorectal carcinoma (Wang et al., 2000) and tumors of the central nervous system (Nabors et al., 2001). This protein is a widely expressed RBP whose function in many cell types has been elucidated. The gene encoding human ELAVL1 is localized to chromosome 19p13.2, and while the protein is mainly localized to the nucleus, it will translocate to the cytoplasm following stimulation by a variety of extracellular stimuli (Chand et al., 2017).

The consequences for an mRNA after ELAVL1 binding to its ARE depend on the mRNA itself and the cell type. When the target ARE, which usually contains multiple AUUUA repeats, appears in the 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs) of an mRNA, ELAVL1 binding often results in mRNA instability (Fan et al., 1997), and thus selective binding of ELAVL1 to the ARE at the 3′ end of an mRNA can lead to rapid degradation (Myer et al., 1997). However, in most cases, ELAVL1 plays an important role in stabilizing the mRNA sequence. Competitive binding to mRNA in the 3′-UTR by ELAVL1 prevents exonuclease- or endonuclease-mediated degradation induced by other RBPs (Chen et al., 1995; Fan and Steitz, 1998b). In one specific case, ELAVL1 promotes neuronal movement by the stabilizing of profilin 1 mRNA (Chen et al., 1995). Similarly, ELAVL1 binding extends the half-life of CX43 mRNA in rat liver epithelial cells (Ale-Agha et al., 2009).

In addition to interacting with the 3′-UTR, ELAVL1 also has multiple effects in other mRNA regions. For example, ELAVL1 can reduce the activity of the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) in the initiation of translation by binding to the 5′-UTR of the mRNA that codes for the insulin like growth factor type 1 receptor (Meng et al., 2005). Conversely, ELAVL1 can stimulate the initiation of translation of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) mRNA by binding to the IRES in the 5′-UTR of the XIAP mRNA (Durie et al., 2011).

Other members of the ELAVL protein family have not been studied to the extent that ELAVL1 has, but these other family members have been shown to be important in multiple physiological and pathological processes. ELAVL2 (also known as HuB or Hel-N1), ELAVL3 (HuC) and ELAVL4 (HuD) are mainly distributed in neuronal cells (Ripin et al., 2019). ELAVL2 plays a key role in several processes in the early stages of neuronal differentiation, such as cell cycle exit (Hambardzumyan et al., 2009). ELAVL3 has been shown to affect brain function in that low expression levels of ELAVL3 correlated with impaired spatial learning ability of mice and led to the down-regulation of expression of growth associated protein-43 (Quattrone et al., 2001). In addition, the levels of the ELAVL4 transcript and protein in the superior cervical ganglion were found to decrease after the severing of the axon (Deschenes-Furry et al., 2007). These results show that ELAVL2-4 are involved in the development and functioning of the nervous system. Interestingly, however, the functions of these three protein family members go far beyond the brain. They are also essential in the maintenance of physiological functions and the regulation of the occurrence and development of a variety of diseases (Mazan-Mamczarz et al., 2003; Casolaro et al., 2008; Beauchamp et al., 2010; Ahuja et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2019).

The Regulation of ELAVL Proteins by Non-RNA Molecules

The regulation of ELAVL proteins by non-RNA molecules can be divided into three categories: regulation of protein expression level, regulation of nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, and regulation of the binding of ELAVL proteins to the transcripts in cytoplasm. In gastric tumorigenesis, the activation of AKT serine/threonine kinase promotes the binding of Nuclear Factor-kappa B to the ELAVL promoter, which enhances transcription and the stability of the transcripts (Kang et al., 2008). In addition, the esophageal cancer related gene 2 protein has been shown to increase ubiquitination and degradation of ELAVL1 in the colon cancer-derived RKO cell line and the breast cancer-derived MCF7 cell line, but this protein failed to produce similar effects on several non-ubiquitinable mutant forms of ELAVL1 (Lucchesi et al., 2016).

In response to proliferative signals, the phosphorylation of ELAVL1 protein by cyclin-dependent kinase 1 at S202 prevents its translocation to the cytoplasm, resulting in the inhibition of its pro-proliferation and anti-apoptotic effects (Kim et al., 2008). Upon cessation of the external signal, two mechanisms serve to promote relocalization to the cytoplasm. One mechanism involves polyADP-ribosylation of ELAVL1 by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (Ke et al., 2017), and a second mechanism is mediated by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (Farooq et al., 2009). In another enzyme-controlled mechanism of regulation, sulfhydration by cystathionine γ lyase prevents the homodimerization of ELAVL1, which ultimately leads to decreases in activity to levels insufficient to increase the expression level of downstream genes in mouse endothelial cells (Bibli et al., 2019).

Interactions Between ELAVL Proteins and Various Classes of RNA Molecules Interactions Between ELAVL Proteins and mRNAs

One of the main functions of the ELAVL protein family is to regulate the stability and half-life of downstream mRNA. Therefore, their regulatory effects on cells almost entirely depend on the function of downstream mRNAs and the direction of regulation. The most common binding sites where ELAVL proteins interact with mRNAs, AREs in the 3′-UTR, are found in up to 8% of human genome transcripts (Bakheet et al., 2006). These AREs are often regarded as regulatory elements that promote mRNA decay; most RBPs that bind to this region, such as tristetraprolin, butyrate response factor 1, AU-binding factor 1, and KH-type splicing regulatory protein, greatly reduce the half-life of the target RNA (Gherzi et al., 2004; Lykke-Andersen and Wagner, 2005; Gratacós and Brewer, 2010). In most cases, however, the effect of the binding of ELAVL proteins to a downstream mRNA supports stability (Barreau et al., 2005). Previously discovered mRNAs that have been found to bind to the ELAVL family are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Interactions Between ELAVL Proteins and ncRNAs Micro RNA (miRNA)

Various miRNA molecules can bind to the 3′-UTRs of mRNA to decrease the stability of the mRNA. Therefore, the regulation of miRNAs to the ELAVL protein family is mainly reflected in the stability of mRNAs of the latter (Table 1). For example, miR-133, which targets the ELAVL1 mRNA and is sponged by long intergenic non-protein coding RNA, muscle differentiation 1 (linc-MD1), regulates the expression of ELAVL1. The ELAVL1 protein in turn promotes the interaction between linc-MD1 and miR-133 in the early stages of myogenesis (Legnini et al., 2014). Through targeting AREs in ELAVL1 mRNA, miR-155-5p negatively regulates the protein level of ELAVL1 and thus the migration of tumor cells in colorectal cancer (Al-Haidari et al., 2018). In breast cancer, miR-125a inhibited cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis by downregulating ELAVL1 which was highly expressed in cancer cells, and this effect was partially rescued by ELAVL1 overexpression (Guo et al., 2009). In normal human dermal fibroblasts, the overexpression of miR-520d-5p has been shown to down-regulate ELAVL2 and restore cell proliferation; down-regulation of ELAVL2 with small interfering RNA alone achieved the same effect (Ishihara et al., 2014). In mutant motor neurons, decreased expression of miR-375 resulted in increased expression of its downstream targets, which include ELAVL4 as well as p53. These changes promoted the apoptosis and fragility of mutant motor neurons in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (De Santis et al., 2017).

TABLE 1

MiRNAs interacting with ELAVL proteins.

Member of protein family	miRNA	Interaction and effect	PMID
ELAVL1	miR-199a	Prevent pre-miR-199a from maturing	26346275
	miR-27	Competitively bind downstream mRNA	25533351
	miR-133	Inhibit ELAVL1 mRNA	24440503
	miR- 155-5p		29471005
	miR-125a		19875930
	miR-519		19088191
	miR-582-3p		32600329
	miR-291b-3p		30106126
	miR-326		32968928
	miR-514a-5p		32370736
	miR-3127-5p		30317610
		miR-23c		27964927
		miR-146b-5p		27166258
ELAVL2	miR-520d	Inhibit ELAVL2 mRNA	25303886
ELAVL4	miR-375	Inhibit ELAVL4 mRNA	28988989
ELAVL4	miR-129-5p	Inhibit ELAVL4 mRNA	32335272

In turn, ELAVL proteins can regulate miRNAs maturation or co-regulate downstream with miRNAs. In another mode of regulation for miR-199a, hypoxia-induced expression of ELAVL1 prevents the maturation of pre-miR-199a, thereby promoting enhancement of glycolysis through impacts of miR-199a on hexokinase 2 and pyruvate kinase 2 expression in the tumor microenvironment (Zhang et al., 2015). It has been shown that miR-27 targets the mRNA encoding zinc finger protein 36 mRNA in macrophages, but ELAVL1 and miR-27 compete for binding to the 3′-UTR of this mRNA to regulate its stability (Lu et al., 2014). These examples indicate that there is significant crosstalk among RBPs, miRNAs and mRNAs, and that the regulation is not limited to a few isolated cases.

Long Non-coding RNA (lncRNA)

The mechanisms by which lncRNAs regulate mRNA activity through the ELAVL protein family, especially ELAVL1, include 1) direct binding to ELAVL1 and promotion of its binding to downstream mRNA, 2) inhibiting of the expression of ELAVL1, 3) stabilizing ELAVL1 protein, 4) direct binding to ELAVL1 and blocking of its binding to downstream mRNA, and 5) promoting the translocation of ELAVL1 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (Table 2).

TABLE 2

LncRNAs that regulate ELAVL proteins.

Member of protein family	LncRNA	Interaction and effect	PMID
ELAVL1	LINC00707	Binds to ELAVL1 and stabilizes downstream mRNA	30502359
	RMST		31636039
	B4GALT1-AS1		30182452
	MIR100HG		30102375
	lincRNA-UFC1		25449213
	HMS		34302808
	lAK136714		34015766
	AGAP2-AS1		33273726
	TUG1		33047284
	TSLNC8		32951177
	ZEB1-AS1		31922280
	HOXB-AS1		31886581
	SNHG7		31026094
	EGFR-AS1		30770799
	LINC00707		30502359
	LINC00324		29915327
	SPRY4-IT1		27853262
	APOA4-AS		27131369
	lncRNA OCC-1	Inhibit the expression of ELAVL1	29931370
	ASB16-AS1		33219221
	AK058003		28035067
	FAM83H-AS1	Stabilize ELAVL1	30831080
	CAAlnc1	Blocks ELAVL1 from binding downstream	30807648
	FENDRR		31180580
	OIP5-AS1		26819413
	OSER1-AS1		33113263
	RPSAP52		31831098
	tie1AS		29724820
	MALAT1		27197265
		lncRNA MAARS	Binds to ELAVL1 and promotes its translocation to the cytoplasm	33262333

First, LINC00707 has been reported as a malignant factor in the progression of lung adenocarcinoma and gastric cancer. LINC00707, which is highly expressed in tumor tissues, has been shown to form a complex with ELAVL1 protein. This complex increases the expression of downstream proteins, such as vav guanine nucleotide exchange factor 3/F11 receptor, and ultimately leads to tumor progression and a poorer tumor prognosis (Xie et al., 2019). In a similar way, lncRNA RMST enhances the binding of ELAVL1 to the mRNA of the target gene DNMT3B, thereby increasing the expression of DNMT3B and global levels of DNA methylation (Peng et al., 2020).

Second, ELAVL1 interacts with lncRNA OCC-1, which acts as a protective factor in colorectal cancer, inhibits the growth of tumor cells in vivo and in vitro. This inhibition is achieved by sensitizing ELAVL1 to ubiquitination and making it prone to degradation (Lan et al., 2018). In the third type of regulation, up-regulated FAM83H-AS1 binds to ELAVL1 and stabilizes it, which can induce cell metastasis and resistance to radiotherapy in ovarian cancer (Dou et al., 2019). As described in the fourth mode of regulation, pull-down assays and RNA immunoprecipitation have confirmed the binding relationship between CAAlnc1 and ELAVL1, which blocked the binding of ELAVL1 to mRNAs associated with fat production (Shen et al., 2019).

According to multiple reports, lncRNA MAARS, which is positively correlated with the progression of atherosclerosis disease, interacts with ELAVL1 and reduces its cytoplasmic localization, which reduces the apoptosis of macrophages and delays the course of the disease (Simion et al., 2020).

Circular RNA (circRNA)

The class of circRNAs includes closed circular ncRNA molecules that are not easily degraded and have been shown to regulate the progression of various diseases (Li et al., 2015). For example, circRHOBTB3 is expressed at relatively low levels in hepatocellular carcinoma, and it has been reported that over-expression of circRHOBTB3 can lead to degradation of ELAVL1 and thus inhibition of the expression of the ELAVL1 target gene PTBP1 (Chen et al., 2021b). ELAVL1 also interacts competitively with circDLC1 to negatively regulate the expression of the gene encoding matrix metalloproteinase 1 (Liu et al., 2021); this mechanism occurs in a similar manner with regard to circPPM1F and its target gene PPM1F (Zhang et al., 2020) and circPABPN1 and its target gene ATG16L1 (Li et al., 2020).

The complex between circ-CCND1 and ELAVL1 promotes the expression of the gene encoding cyclin D1 and ultimately leads to the malignant proliferation of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (Zang et al., 2020). A similar mechanism has been found in the relationship among CircAGO2/ELAVL/AGO2 (Chen et al., 2019). Further studies have shown that circRNA-mediated positive regulation of downstream mRNAs may be achieved by promoting the cytoplasmic relocation of ELAVL1; thus, circBACH1 binds directly to ELAVL1 and mediates its translocation from the nucleus, thereby increasing its binding to the mRNA encoding p27 (Liu et al., 2020b). At the level of transcription, nuclear-localized circ-HuR derived from ELAVL1 can bind to the transcription factor cellular nucleic acid-binding protein to block this protein from binding to the ELAVL1 promoter, resulting in a decreased expression of ELAVL1 (Yang et al., 2019). In another regulatory mechanism, direct binding of Hsa_circ_00074854 to the ELAVL1 protein improves the stability of the protein, and ultimately promotes hepatocellular carcinoma migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (Wang et al., 2021). The interaction between ncRNA and ELAVL proteins is shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2

The interaction of ELAVL proteins with mRNAs and ncRNAs. In response to external stimuli like UV irradiation, gemcitabine or hypoxia, ELAVL1 is transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. And ELAVL2-4 are mainly localized in the cytoplasm. (A) ELAVL proteins inhibit mRNAs’ degradation and stabilize them by binding the 3′-UTR. In another regulation mode, ELAVL proteins can promote or inhibit mRNAs’ translation by binding the 5′-UTR; (B) miRNAs and ELAVL proteins co-regulate downstream mRNAs, and some miRNAs can regulate the expression of ELAVL proteins by binding their mRNAs. (C) circRNA and lncRNAs promote ELAVL proteins’ degradation or stabilize them by binding to them. And circRNAs and lncRNAs can also promote or inhibit the binding of ELAVL proteins to downstream mRNAs. Created with BioRender.com.

ELAVL Proteins in Pathological and Physiological Processes ELAVL Proteins in Cancers ELAVL1

ELAVL1 is indispensable to life. For example, the ELAVL1 gene is expressed during mouse embryonic development and growth cycle (Gouble and Morello, 2000), and the knockout of mouse ELAVL1 leads to hematopoietic failure, loss of intestinal villi, and death within 10 days (Ghosh et al., 2009). Thus, ELAVL1 protein is necessary in the maintenance of normal life processes. On the other hand, dysregulation of the expression of the ELAVL1 gene or the activity of the protein can also lead to aberrant cellular growth and cancer. A schematic of the relationships between ELAVL1 and cancer is shown in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3

The role of ELAVL1 in tumors. ELAVL1 affects tumor biology by either (1) promoting proliferation, (2) inhibiting apoptosis, (3) promoting migration, (4) inducing drug resistance, (5) promoting angiogenesis, or (6) reducing DNA damage. Created with BioRender.com.

Colorectal Cancer

The functions of ELAVL1 in colorectal cancer have been studied extensively. Importantly, studies have connected ELAVL1 to cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), which has been shown through in vivo and in vitro studies to be a key factor in the malignant progression of colorectal cancer. As noted, ELAVL1 typically distributes mainly to the nucleus, but β-catenin can promote the cytoplasmic translocation of ELAVL1 (Lee and Jeong, 2006). Enrichment of ELAVL1 in the cytoplasm prolongs stabilization of the mRNA that encodes for COX-2 by binding with an ARE in the 3′-UTR, causing an increase in COX-2 protein levels (Dixon et al., 2001). Accordingly, the cytoplasmic localization of ELAVL1 has been shown to be significantly positively correlated with tumor stage (Denkert et al., 2006).

Interactions with the cell cycle also explain involvement of ELAVL1 in colorectal cancer. For example, ELAVL1 positively regulates the cell division 6 protein, which is highly expressed in colorectal cancer and which drives both the malignant behavior of colorectal cancer and its resistance to oxaliplatin (Cai et al., 2019). It has been reported that in the colorectal carcinoma RKO cell line, the levels of ELAVL1 in the cytoplasm increase during the late G₁, S, and G₂ phases of the cell cycle, and it binds to the 3′-UTR of mRNAs encoding cyclins A and B1, resulting in enhanced stability of these mRNAs and increased expression of the proteins, ultimately leading to increased cell proliferation (Wang et al., 2000). In animal experiments, overexpressing ELAVL1 in RKO cells results in increased tumor sizes upon injection into nude mice (de Silanes et al., 2003).

Ovarian Cancer

ELAVL1 can promote the expression level of COX-2 in ovarian cancer as well as in colorectal cancer, and COX-2 is also positively correlated with poor prognosis and high-grade of ovarian cancer. When the nuclear translocation of ELAVL1 is suppressed, the expression of COX-2 decreases in vitro (Erkinheimo et al., 2003). Accordingly, it has been found that levels of ELAVL1 in the cytoplasm of cells in ovarian cancer tissues was significantly increased relative to levels in borderline tumors or normal ovaries (Denkert et al., 2004). Another interaction with ovarian cancer involves miR-519, which targets the 3′-UTR of ELAVL1 mRNA, inhibiting its translation and slowing cell division of A2780 cells, a human ovarian cancer cell line, in vitro (Abdelmohsen et al., 2008). Also, in A2780 cells, glucose deprivation has been shown to enhance ELAVL1-dependent TUBB3 expression at the mRNA and protein levels, resulting in tumor invasion (Raspaglio et al., 2010).

Breast Cancer

ELAVL1 affects the development of breast cancer by regulating the mRNAs associated with a variety of proteins. Accordingly, among familial non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer patients, ELAVL1 can be used as an independent prognostic factor, associated with low survival rate and high tumor malignancy (Heinonen et al., 2007). Mechanistically, ELAVL1 promotes the expression of interleukin (IL)-8, which has clear connections with the progression of breast cancer, via binding to the 3′-UTR of the mRNA encoding IL-1β (Suswam et al., 2005). In addition, the abnormal expression of cyclin E1, Wnt-5a, thrombospondin 1 and the colony stimulating factor receptor is directly related to the increased expression of ELAVL1 in breast cancer models (Guo and Hartley, 2006; Leandersson et al., 2006; Mazan-Mamczarz et al., 2008; Woo et al., 2009). When ELAVL1 is silenced, the programmed death of tumor cells increases and invasion is inhibited (Heinonen et al., 2011). ELAVL1 is also regulated by upstream factors in breast cancer. Levels of miR-125 are negatively correlated with ELAVL1; miR-125 may thus act as an inhibitor of ELAVL1 to decrease translation by binding with its mRNA (Guo et al., 2009).

Pancreatic Cancer

The role of ELAVL1 in pancreatic cancer remain controversial. Overexpression of ELAVL1 in pancreatic cancer cells has been shown to increase the sensitivity of patients to gemcitabine treatment. The mechanism of this effect involves the binding of ELAVL1 to and the promotion effect of the mRNA that encodes deoxycytidine kinase whose products can activate gemcitabine (Costantino et al., 2009). In another report, ELAVL1 was also shown to be involved in the apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells exposed to gemcitabine. ELAVL1 translocates to the cytoplasm after gemcitabine treatment, where it binds to the mRNA of retinoic acid-induced protein 3, which acts as an oncogene, leading to an increase of it at the initial stage of drug treatment (Zhou et al., 2016). Hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment can similarly induce nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of ELAVL1, which then promotes the expression of the PIM1 serine/threonine kinase, which leads to resistance to oxaliplatin (Blanco et al., 2016). In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, ELAVL1 promotes the translation of poly (ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase mRNA, leading to enhanced DNA repair and resistance to the PARP inhibitor olaparib (Chand et al., 2017).

Other Types of Cancer

ELAVL1 has been found to play important roles in multiple kinds of tumors. For instance, ELAVL1 has been found to be highly expressed in prostate cancer, and it thus acts as an independent predictor positively correlating with tumor staging and metastasis. ELAVL1 promotes cell proliferation and migration of cells of the prostate cancer lines LNCaP and PC-3 by targeting vascular endothelial growth factors A and C and COX-2 (Barbisan et al., 2009; Mitsunari et al., 2016).

In hepatocellular carcinoma cells, the highly expressed lincRNA-UFC1 directly binds to ELAVL1, leading to an increase of β-catenin mRNA and protein and finally increased cell proliferation and decreased apoptosis (Cao et al., 2015). Similarly, hsa_circ_0074854 promotes the migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by stabilizing ELAVL1 (Wang et al., 2021). On another hand, ELAVL1 binds pre-miRNA-199a to prevent its maturation, leading to enhanced glycolytic metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma cells in response to hypoxia (Zhang et al., 2015).

In glioblastoma multiforme and adjacent tissues, high expression of ELAVL1 can also be detected (Nabors et al., 2001). In glioblastoma, pyruvate kinase M2, which is up-regulated, binds to ELAVL1 and promotes its cytoplasmic localization, prompting tumor cells to enter a dividing state and promoting cell growth (Mukherjee et al., 2016). In a nude mouse model of glioblastoma, knockdown of ELAVL1 reduced tumor growth and proliferation, and prolonged survival time (Wang et al., 2019b).

Generally speaking, ELAVL1 often appears as a malignant factor. On the one hand, it is indispensable in life activities. On the other hand, the tumorigenic effects of high expression of ELAVL1 acts as an important contributor to the progression and invasion of many types of tumor through various pathways. Therefore, ELAVL1 may be a potential drug target with universal applicability.

ELAVL2-4

The three other family members, ELAVL2, ELAVL3 and ELAVL4, initially received much attention as neuroendocrine markers for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (King, 1997; D'Alessandro et al., 2008). Among them, ELAVL4 received the most attention in SCLC, because it was found to be expressed in 100% of SCLC cells and more than 50% of neuroblastoma cells, and treatment targeting ELAVL4 can reduce tumor progression in nude mouse models (Ohwada et al., 1999; Ehrlich et al., 2014). As the antigen target of autoreactive CD4⁺ T cells, ELAVL4 may directly participate in cell-mediated anti-tumor immunity and nervous system damage (Benyahia et al., 1999).

At the level of post-transcriptional regulation, ELAVL4 regulates RNA as an RBP, but in tumorigenic neuroblasts, ELAVL4 also takes part in the nuclear processing and stability of the pre-mRNA of the proto-oncogenic transcription factor N-myc (Lazarova et al., 1999). ELAVL4 has also been shown to interact with both the 3′-UTR and 5′-UTR regions of the p27 mRNA to promote its translation leading to tumor suppression, but ELAVL4 and p27 levels are both reduced in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Kim et al., 2018). Outside of SCLC, ELAVL2 has been shown to be an independent risk factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and it increases the resistance of these tumor cells to paclitaxel and cisplatin (Zhao et al., 2019).

There are also notable cancer-related interactions between members of the ELAVL family. A combination of ELAVL2 and ELAVL1 has been shown to localize to the nucleus and to be indispensable in the activation of several proto-oncogenes, including v-fos, v-ets, and v-myc (Hatanaka et al., 2019). Also, by binding with a structure containing an AU-rich sequence, ELAVL2 and ELAVL4 together inhibit the assembly of the core complex of telomerase to reduce its activity and cell growth in human neuroblastoma cells; notably, the activity of this complex antagonizes the function of ELAVL1 (Cheng et al., 2021). Surprisingly, considering the importance of the other ELAVL family members, few reports link ELAVL3 to tumor development or progression.

ELAVL Proteins in Disorders of the Nervous System

The ELAVL protein family was originally best known for its associations with the nervous system (Akamatsu et al., 1999). In the development of the neocortex, the deletion of ELAVL1 reduces the phosphorylation of eIF2a and eEF2 and the formation of polysomes, ultimately leading to the mis-localization of mRNAs. The lack of ELAVL1 reduces the stability of PFN1 mRNA and affects actin polymerization, resulting in the mis-localization of neurons in the neocortex (Kraushar et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2020a). It also participates in cellular metabolism and protection from oxidation-induced neurodegeneration (Skliris et al., 2015).

With regard to various disease states, ELAVL1 has either protective or damaging effects, depending on the circumstances. In spinal muscle atrophy, ELAVL1 stabilizes survival motor neuron transcripts, which leads to accumulation of the protein products, thus alleviating the loss of alpha motor neurons that otherwise lead to progressive muscle atrophy (Farooq et al., 2009). In the occurrence and progress of neurodegenerative diseases, including age-related macular degeneration, ELAVL1 promotes the early elevation and accumulation of P62 in response to the early activation of autophagy, clearing protein multimers and alleviating neurodegenerative effects (Marchesi et al., 20182018).

On the other hand, ELAVL1 has been found to play deleterious roles in Huntington’s disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In Huntington’s disease, which is caused by mutations in the HTT gene and abnormal accumulation of the HTT protein, the HTT protein itself induces ELAVL1 to stabilize HTT mRNA, forming a positive feedback loop (Zhao et al., 2020b). Moreover, inhibition of ELAVL1 has been shown to block the chronic activation of microglia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and to delay the course of this disease (Matsye et al., 2017).

In neurons, ELAVL2, ELAVL3, and ELAVL4 function in stages. ELAVL2 protein is expressed in early neuron progenitor cells through to mature neurons, while ELAVL3 and 4 are expressed later than ELAVL2 and function mainly in cortical neuron development (Yano et al., 2016). Multiple studies have linked ELAVL4 to neuron development and plasticity (Bronicki et al., 2012; Loffreda et al., 2020). ELAVL4 is engaged in stabilization of tau microtubule-associated protein transcripts and maintains axon development in neuronal cells. Accordingly, the inhibition of ELAVL4 results in the cessation of axonal growth (Aranda-Abreu et al., 1999; Fukao et al., 2009; Hao le et al., 2017), and a deficiency of ELAVL4 in mice leads to transient impaired cranial nerve development during the embryonic period in vivo (Akamatsu et al., 2005).

Similar to ELAVL1, ELAVL4 is indispensable for establishing neocortex and hippocampal circuits and maintaining the function of these circuits (DeBoer et al., 2014). Furthermore, in the adult subventricular zone neural stem and progenitor cells, ELAVL4 promotes neuronal differentiation through special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 1 (SATB1). A lack of SATB1 affects the maturation of neuronal stem cells, and the overexpression of SATB1 in ELAVL4-suppressed cells can restore the neuronal differentiation phenotype (Wang et al., 2015). ELAVL2 promotes the exit from the cell cycle during the neuronal stem cell maturation, and overexpression of ELAVL2 restricts the proliferation of neuronal stem cells (Hambardzumyan et al., 2009). For ELAVL3, a low level of ELAVL3 leads to the impairment of spatial learning ability of mice with lowered expression of growth-associated protein 43 (Quattrone et al., 2001).

ELAVL Proteins in Other Physiological and Pathological Process

In addition to cancer and processes involving the nervous system, the ELAVL protein family is also involved in muscle differentiation (Beauchamp et al., 2010), aging (Lee et al., 2018), inflammation (Casolaro et al., 2008), stress events (Mazan-Mamczarz et al., 2003; Ahuja et al., 2016) and other processes. Figure 4 shows how tumors and other different diseases interact with ELAVL proteins.

FIGURE 4

Diseases or pathophysiological processes related to ELAVL proteins. Diseases related to ELAVL proteins are included in the figure.

The impact on muscle differentiation involves a novel proteolytic cleavage of ELAVL1. When transferred to the cytoplasm in myoblasts, some ELAVL1 is cleaved into two fragments, cleavage products (CP) 1 and 2, of sizes 24 and 8 kDa, respectively. CP1 forms a complex with ELAVL1 import factor transportin-2 (TRN2), allowing uncleaved ELAVL1 to remain in the cytoplasm. The other fragment, CP2, promotes myogenesis (Beauchamp et al., 2010).

The known impact of ELAVL1 on aging involves interactions with the telomeric protein TIN2. ELAVL1 binding destabilizes TIN2 mRNA to decay quickly. Therefore, when ELAVL1 is inhibited, the expression of TIN2 protein in the mitochondria are increased. These factors correlate with increased levels of ROS, ultimately leading to cell senescence (Lee et al., 2018).

Inflammatory stimuli lead to poly ADP-ribosylation of D226 of ELAVL1. Modified ELAVL1 oligomerizes in the presence of PARP1, resulting in the protection of pro-inflammatory mRNA from degradation induced by miRNA and other factors. Therefore, treatments targeting ELAVL1 alleviate the lipopolysaccharide-induced accumulation of inflammatory cells in the airways of mice (Ke et al., 2021). In another inflammatory disease, pterygium, the activation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 by ELAVL1 amplifies the pro-inflammatory effect of IL-1β (Cui et al., 2020). The combination of ELAVL1 and matrix metalloproteinase 9 also appears in the inflammatory infiltration of cardiomyocytes in acute myocardial infarction. IL-10 can inhibit this combined effect to alleviate fibrosis and inflammation, and ultimately reduce damage to left ventricular function (Krishnamurthy et al., 2009).

Under the influence of different stressors, the function of ELAVL1 changes accordingly. Low-level UV irradiation induces the translocation of ELAVL1 to the cytoplasm, where it interacts with and preserves transcription products by binding with them after the formation of DNA damage. At the same time, the transcription process is inhibited to prevent the generation of false transcripts. In this mode, ELAVL1 is beneficial to cell survival (Mazan-Mamczarz et al., 2003). On the other hand, after ionizing radiation, ELAVL1 is separated from almost all mRNAs, including proliferation-related and apoptosis-related proteins. While this mechanism is different from that associated with UV irradiation, it similarly contributes to a better survival outcome for cells (Masuda et al., 2011). However, when cells are subjected to high pressure stress, ELAVL1 is translocated to the cytoplasm and where it is cleaved by caspases at A226, and this action amplifies apoptotic signals (Mazroui et al., 2008).

Inhibitors of ELAVL1

Research on the inhibitors of ELAVL proteins has mainly focused on ELAVL1. In view of the positive regulation of ELAVL1 in tumor promotion, the research and development of inhibitors is of significance. At present, the effects of inhibitors on ELAVL1 are mainly focused in four directions: inhibiting its nucleocytoplasmic trafficking, blocking its binding to mRNA, suppressing its dimerization/multimerization and downregulating its expression. As shown in Figure 5, MS-444 (Meisner et al., 2007), dehydromutactin (Meisner et al., 2007), okicenone (Meisner et al., 2007), eltrombopag (Zhu et al., 2020) and SRI-42127 (Filippova et al., 2021) inhibit the dimerization/multimerization of ELAVL1; 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (AZA) (Hostetter et al., 2008), trichostatin A (TSA) (Hostetter et al., 2008), pyrvinium pamoate (Guo et al., 2016) and Rottlerin (Latorre et al., 2012) inhibite ELAVL1’s nucleocytoplasmic trafficking; Dihydrotanshinone-I (Lal et al., 2017), azaphilone-9 (AZA-9) (Kaur et al., 2017), quercetin (Chae et al., 2009), b-40 (Chae et al., 2009), suramin (Kakuguchi et al., 2018), KH-3 (Wu et al., 2020) and CMLD1 (Wu et al., 2015) block ELAVL1’s binding to mRNA; CMLD2 downregulates ELAVL1’s expression (Muralidharan et al., 2017) and blocks its binding to mRNA (Wu et al., 2015). Among these inhibitors, MS-444, dehydromutactin, okicenone, SRI-42127, AZA-9, b-40, KH-3, CMLD1 and CMLD2 are specific inhibitors of ELAVL1, while others are not. For example, eltrombopag often acts as a thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist (Bussel et al., 2019), AZA as a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (Song et al., 2022) and TSA as a histone deacetylase inhibitor (He et al., 2022). Pyrvinium pamoate (Faheem et al., 2022), Rottlerin (Hufnagel et al., 2009), dihydrotanshinone-I (Sun et al., 2022), quercetin (Zaragozá et al., 2022) and suramin (Zhang et al., 2022) all have effects on other physiological or pathological processes.

FIGURE 5

The drugs being used to inhibit ELAVL1, the processes how drugs affect ELAVL1 and the diseases the drugs aim to alleviate.

Conclusion and Perspective

This review summarizes the role of ELAVL proteins in various pathophysiological processes and in regulating mRNA and ncRNA. Given the ubiquity of ELAVL proteins existence and their role in a variety of diseases, it is logical to develop innovative small molecules. Based on the interaction mechanism between ncRNA and ELAVL proteins, the development of ncRNA analogs to promote the degradation of ELAVL proteins or inhibit the translation of their mRNAs is worth discussing. Developing chemically inactive analogs of ELAVL proteins to interfere with their synergy or competition with ncRNA in a competitive manner may also provide a new perspective to reduce the functionality of the protein family. Notably, although the ELAVL proteins have promising potential as a therapeutic target, many questions still need to be further explored. Interfering with ELAVL proteins seems to be a new strategy; however, considering that they are an integral part of life activities and interact with too many RNA molecules, whether their intervention will cause other unexpected side effects needs to be handled carefully. Is it better to use it alone or in combination with other drugs? According to previous reports, inhibition of ELAVL1 sensitized tumors to treatment with platinum-based drugs, including oxaliplatin and cisplatin (Young et al., 2009). What about drugs other than platinum-based drugs? In addition, considering ELAVL2-4 participating in many pathological processes and the similarity of the structure between ELAVL2-4 and ELAVL1, substantial study is imminent to fill the lacunae in the development of ELAVL2-4 inhibitors.

Author Contributions

HJC and DDZ collected literatures, prepared figures and tables, drafted the manuscript and edited the manuscript. YZY helped to arrange the manuscript. LHY, XYH and LXW conceived the idea and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170061 and 82170062).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2022.847761/full#supplementary-material

References Abdelmohsen

Srikantan

Kuwano

Gorospe

(2008). miR-519 Reduces Cell Proliferation by Lowering RNA-Binding Protein HuR Levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 20297–20302. 10.1073/pnas.0809376106 Ahuja

Goyal

Ray

P. S.

(2016). Interplay between RNA-Binding Protein HuR and microRNA-125b Regulates P53 mRNA Translation in Response to Genotoxic Stress. RNA Biol. 13, 1152–1165. 10.1080/15476286.2016.1229734 Akamatsu

Fujihara

Mitsuhashi

Yano

Shibata

Hayakawa

(2005). The RNA-Binding Protein HuD Regulates Neuronal Cell Identity and Maturation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 4625–4630. 10.1073/pnas.0407523102 Akamatsu

Okano

H. J.

Osumi

Inoue

Nakamura

Sakakibara

S.-I.

(1999). Mammalian ELAV-like Neuronal RNA-Binding Proteins HuB and HuC Promote Neuronal Development in Both the central and the Peripheral Nervous Systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 9885–9890. 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9885 Al-Haidari

Algaber

Madhi

Syk

Thorlacius

(2018). MiR-155-5p Controls colon Cancer Cell Migration via post-transcriptional Regulation of Human Antigen R (HuR). Cancer Lett. 421, 145–151. 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.02.026 Ale-Agha

Galban

Sobieroy

Abdelmohsen

Gorospe

Sies

(2009). HuR Regulates gap Junctional Intercellular Communication by Controlling β-catenin Levels and Adherens junction Integrity. Hepatology 50, 1567–1576. 10.1002/hep.23146 Aranda-Abreu

G. E.

Behar

Chung

Furneaux

Ginzburg

(1999). Embryonic Lethal Abnormal Vision-like RNA-Binding Proteins Regulate Neurite Outgrowth and Tau Expression in PC12 Cells. J. Neurosci. 19, 6907–6917. 10.1523/jneurosci.19-16-06907.1999 Bakheet

Williams

B. R.

Khabar

K. S.

(2006). ARED 3.0: the Large and Diverse AU-Rich Transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D111–D114. 10.1093/nar/gkj052 Barbisan

Mazzucchelli

Santinelli

Lopez-Beltran

Cheng

Scarpelli

(2009). Overexpression of ELAV-like Protein HuR Is Associated with Increased COX-2 Expression in Atrophy, High-Grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Incidental Prostate Cancer in Cystoprostatectomies. Eur. Urol. 56, 105–112. 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.043 Barreau

Paillard

Osborne

H. B.

(2005). AU-rich Elements and Associated Factors: Are There Unifying Principles? Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 7138–7150. 10.1093/nar/gki1012 Beauchamp

Nassif

Hillock

van der Giessen

von Roretz

Jasmin

B. J.

(2010). The Cleavage of HuR Interferes with its Transportin-2-Mediated Nuclear Import and Promotes Muscle Fiber Formation. Cell Death Differ 17, 1588–1599. 10.1038/cdd.2010.34 Benyahia

Liblau

Merle-Béral

H. l. n.

Tourani

J.-M.

Dalmau

Delattre

J.-Y.

(1999). Cell-mediated Autoimmunity in Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes with Anti-hu Antibodies. Ann. Neurol. 45, 162–167. 10.1002/1531-8249(199902)45:2<162::aid-ana5>3.0.co;2-r Bibli

S.-I.

Sigala

Wittig

Heidler

Zukunft

(2019). Cystathionine γ Lyase Sulfhydrates the RNA Binding Protein Human Antigen R to Preserve Endothelial Cell Function and Delay Atherogenesis. Circulation 139, 101–114. 10.1161/circulationaha.118.034757 Blanco

F. F.

Jimbo

Wulfkuhle

Gallagher

Deng

Enyenihi

(2016). The mRNA-Binding Protein HuR Promotes Hypoxia-Induced Chemoresistance through Posttranscriptional Regulation of the Proto-Oncogene PIM1 in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Oncogene 35, 2529–2541. 10.1038/onc.2015.325 Bronicki

L. M.

Belanger

Jasmin

B. J.

(2012). Characterization of Multiple Exon 1 Variants in Mammalian HuD mRNA and Neuron-specific Transcriptional Control via Neurogenin 2. J. Neurosci. 32, 11164–11175. 10.1523/jneurosci.2247-12.2012 Bussel

Kulasekararaj

Cooper

Verma

Steidl

Semple

J. W.

(2019). Mechanisms and Therapeutic Prospects of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists. Semin. Hematol. 56, 262–278. 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2019.09.001 Cai

Wang

Jiao

Huang

Qin

Zhang

(2019). The RNA-Binding Protein HuR Confers Oxaliplatin Resistance of Colorectal Cancer by Upregulating CDC6. Mol. Cancer Ther. 18, 1243–1254. 10.1158/1535-7163.Mct-18-0945 Campos

A. R.

And

D. G.

White

(1985). Mutant Alleles at the Locus Elav in Drosophila melanogaster lead to Nervous System Defects. A Developmental-Genetic Analysis. J. Neurogenet. 2, 197–218. 10.3109/01677068509100150 Cao

Sun

Zhang

Guo

Xie

(2015). The Long Intergenic Noncoding RNA UFC1, a Target of MicroRNA 34a, Interacts with the mRNA Stabilizing Protein HuR to Increase Levels of β-Catenin in HCC Cells. Gastroenterology 148, 415–426. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.10.012 Casolaro

Fang

Tancowny

Fan

Srikantan

(2008). Posttranscriptional Regulation of IL-13 in T Cells: Role of the RNA-Binding Protein HuR. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 121, 853–859. e854. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.12.1166 Chae

M.-J.

Sung

H. Y.

Kim

E.-H.

Lee

Kwak

Chae

C. H.

(2009). Chemical Inhibitors Destabilize HuR Binding to the AU-Rich Element of TNF-α mRNA. Exp. Mol. Med. 41, 824–831. 10.3858/emm.2009.41.11.088 Chand

S. N.

Zarei

Schiewer

M. J.

Kamath

A. R.

Romeo

Lal

(2017). Posttranscriptional Regulation of PARG mRNA by HuR Facilitates DNA Repair and Resistance to PARP Inhibitors. Cancer Res. 77, 5011–5025. 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-16-2704 Chen

C. Y.

Shyu

A. B.

(1995). mRNA Decay Mediated by Two Distinct AU-Rich Elements from C-Fos and Granulocyte-Macrophage colony-stimulating Factor Transcripts: Different Deadenylation Kinetics and Uncoupling from Translation. Mol. Cell Biol 15, 5777–5788. 10.1128/mcb.15.10.5777 Chen

Luo

Jin

Zhou

(2021). Circular RNA circRHOBTB3 Represses Metastasis by Regulating the HuR-Mediated mRNA Stability of PTBP1 in Colorectal Cancer. Theranostics 11, 7507–7526. 10.7150/thno.59546 Chen

Lei

She

Zhou

Shi

(2021). Lnc-GD2H Promotes Proliferation by Forming a Feedback Loop with C-Myc and Enhances Differentiation through Interacting with NACA to Upregulate Myog in C2C12 Myoblasts. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 671857. 10.3389/fcell.2021.671857 Chen

Yang

Fang

Xiao

Mei

(2019). Circular RNA circAGO2 Drives Cancer Progression through Facilitating HuR-Repressed Functions of AGO2-miRNA Complexes. Cell Death Differ 26, 1346–1364. 10.1038/s41418-018-0220-6 Cheng

Xia

Yang

Feng

H. L.

(2021). HuB and HuD Repress Telomerase Activity by Dissociating HuR from TERC. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 2848–2858. 10.1093/nar/gkab062 Colombrita

Silani

Ratti

(2013). ELAV Proteins along Evolution: Back to the Nucleus? Mol. Cell Neurosci. 56, 447–455. 10.1016/j.mcn.2013.02.003 Costantino

C. L.

Witkiewicz

A. K.

Kuwano

Cozzitorto

J. A.

Kennedy

E. P.

Dasgupta

(2009). The Role of HuR in Gemcitabine Efficacy in Pancreatic Cancer: HuR Up-Regulates the Expression of the Gemcitabine Metabolizing Enzyme Deoxycytidine Kinase. Cancer Res. 69, 4567–4572. 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-09-0371 Cui

Y. H.

Feng

Q. Y.

Liu

H. Y.

Song

X. L.

Z. X.

(2020). Posttranscriptional Regulation of MMP‐9 by HuR Contributes to IL‐1β‐induced Pterygium Fibroblast Migration and Invasion. J. Cell Physiol 235, 5130–5140. 10.1002/jcp.29387 D'Alessandro

Muscarella

L. A.

Copetti

Zelante

Carella

Vendemiale

(2008). Molecular Detection of Neuron-specific ELAV-Like-Positive Cells in the Peripheral Blood of Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Cell Oncol 30, 291–297. 10.3233/clo-2008-0424 De Santis

Santini

Colantoni

Peruzzi

de Turris

Alfano

(2017). FUS Mutant Human Motoneurons Display Altered Transcriptome and microRNA Pathways with Implications for ALS Pathogenesis. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 1450–1462. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.09.004 de Silanes

I. L.

Fan

Yang

Zonderman

A. B.

Potapova

Pizer

E. S.

(2003). Role of the RNA-Binding Protein HuR in colon Carcinogenesis. Oncogene 22, 7146–7154. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206862 DeBoer

E. M.

Azevedo

Vega

T. A.

Brodkin

Akamatsu

Okano

(2014). Prenatal Deletion of the RNA-Binding Protein HuD Disrupts Postnatal Cortical Circuit Maturation and Behavior. J. Neurosci. 34, 3674–3686. 10.1523/jneurosci.3703-13.2014 Denkert

Koch

von Keyserlingk

Noske

Niesporek

Dietel

(2006). Expression of the ELAV-like Protein HuR in Human colon Cancer: Association with Tumor Stage and Cyclooxygenase-2. Mod. Pathol. 19, 1261–1269. 10.1038/modpathol.3800645 Denkert

Weichert

Pest

Koch

Licht

Köbel

(2004). Overexpression of the Embryonic-Lethal Abnormal Vision-like Protein HuR in Ovarian Carcinoma Is a Prognostic Factor and Is Associated with Increased Cyclooxygenase 2 Expression. Cancer Res. 64, 189–195. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-1987 Deschenes-Furry

Mousavi

Bolognani

Neve

R. L.

Parks

R. J.

Perrone-Bizzozero

N. I.

(2007). The RNA-Binding Protein HuD Binds Acetylcholinesterase mRNA in Neurons and Regulates its Expression after Axotomy. J. Neurosci. 27, 665–675. 10.1523/jneurosci.4626-06.2007 Dixon

D. A.

Tolley

N. D.

King

P. H.

Nabors

L. B.

McIntyre

T. M.

Zimmerman

G. A.

(2001). Altered Expression of the mRNA Stability Factor HuR Promotes Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in colon Cancer Cells. J. Clin. Invest. 108, 1657–1665. 10.1172/jci12973 Dou

Zhu

Yan

(2019). LncRNA FAM83H-AS1 Contributes to the Radioresistance, Proliferation, and Metastasis in Ovarian Cancer through Stabilizing HuR Protein. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 852, 134–141. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.03.002 Durie

Lewis

S. M.

Liwak

Kisilewicz

Gorospe

Holcik

(2011). RNA-binding Protein HuR Mediates Cytoprotection through Stimulation of XIAP Translation. Oncogene 30, 1460–1469. 10.1038/onc.2010.527 Ehrlich

Wang

Dowling

Yuan

(2014). Intratumoral Anti-HuD Immunotoxin Therapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer and Neuroblastoma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 7, 91. 10.1186/s13045-014-0091-3 Erkinheimo

T. L.

Lassus

Sivula

Sengupta

Furneaux

Hla

(2003). Cytoplasmic HuR Expression Correlates with Poor Outcome and with Cyclooxygenase 2 Expression in Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Cancer Res. 63, 7591–7594. http://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/63/22/7591/2509724/zch02203007591.pdf. Faheem

S. A.

El- Sayed

N. M.

Moustafa

Y. M.

Saeed

N. M.

Hazem

R. M.

(2022). Pyrvinium Pamoate Ameliorates Cyclosporin A- Induced Hepatotoxicity via the Modulation of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling and Upregulation of PPAR-γ. Int. Immunopharmacology 104, 108538. 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108538 Fan

X. C.

Myer

V. E.

Steitz

J. A.

(1997). AU-rich Elements Target Small Nuclear RNAs as Well as mRNAs for Rapid Degradation. Genes Dev. 11, 2557–2568. 10.1101/gad.11.19.2557 Fan

X. C.

Steitz

J. A.

(1998). Overexpression of HuR, a Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Shuttling Protein, Increases the Invivo Stability of ARE-Containing mRNAs. Embo j 17, 3448–3460. 10.1093/emboj/17.12.3448 Fan

X. C.

Steitz

J. A.

(1998). HNS, a Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Shuttling Sequence in HuR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 15293–15298. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15293 Farooq

Balabanian

Liu

Holcik

MacKenzie

(2009). p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Stabilizes SMN mRNA through RNA Binding Protein HuR. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 4035–4045. 10.1093/hmg/ddp352 Filippova

Yang

Ananthan

Calano

Pathak

Bratton

(2021). Targeting the HuR Oncogenic Role with a New Class of Cytoplasmic Dimerization Inhibitors. Cancer Res. 81, 2220–2233. 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-20-2858 Fukao

Sasano

Imataka

Inoue

Sakamoto

Sonenberg

(2009). The ELAV Protein HuD Stimulates Cap-dependent Translation in a Poly(A)- and eIF4A-dependent Manner. Mol. Cell 36, 1007–1017. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.013 Gherzi

Lee

K.-Y.

Briata

Wegmüller

Moroni

Karin

(2004). A KH Domain RNA Binding Protein, KSRP, Promotes ARE-Directed mRNA Turnover by Recruiting the Degradation Machinery. Mol. Cell 14, 571–583. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.002 Ghosh

Aguila

H. L.

Michaud

M.-T.

Hemmes

(2009). Essential Role of the RNA-Binding Protein HuR in Progenitor Cell Survival in Mice. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 3530–3543. 10.1172/jci38263 Good

P. J.

(1995). A Conserved Family of Elav-like Genes in Vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92, 4557–4561. 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4557 Gouble

Morello

(2000). Synchronous and Regulated Expression of Two AU-Binding Proteins, AUF1 and HuR, throughout Murine Development. Oncogene 19, 5377–5384. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203910 Gratacós

F. M.

Brewer

(2010). The Role of AUF1 in Regulated mRNA Decay. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 1, 457–473. 10.1002/wrna.26 Guo

Chang

Chen

(2016). Inhibiting Cytoplasmic Accumulation of HuR Synergizes Genotoxic Agents in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder. Oncotarget 7, 45249–45262. 10.18632/oncotarget.9932 Guo

Hartley

R. S.

(2006). HuR Contributes to Cyclin E1 Deregulation in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 66, 7948–7956. 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-05-4362 Guo

Hartley

(2009). MicroRNA-125a Represses Cell Growth by Targeting HuR in Breast Cancer. RNA Biol. 6, 575–583. 10.4161/rna.6.5.10079 Hambardzumyan

Sergent-Tanguy

Thinard

Bonnamain

Masip

Fabre

(2009). AUF1 and Hu Proteins in the Developing Rat Brain: Implication in the Proliferation and Differentiation of Neural Progenitors. J. Neurosci. Res. 87, 1296–1309. 10.1002/jnr.21957 Hao le

Duy

P. Q.

Talbot

Iyer

C. C.

Wolman

(2017). HuD and the Survival Motor Neuron Protein Interact in Motoneurons and Are Essential for Motoneuron Development, Function, and mRNA Regulation. J. Neurosci. 37, 11559–11571. 10.1523/jneurosci.1528-17.2017 Hatanaka

Higashino

Tei

Yasuda

(2019). The Neural ELAVL Protein HuB Enhances Endogenous Proto-Oncogene Activation. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 517, 330–337. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.07.089 He

X. B.

Huang

Guo

(2022). A Novel Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor‐based Approach to Eliminate Microglia and Retain Astrocyte Properties in Glial Cell Culture. J. Neurochem. 10.1111/jnc.15581 Heinonen

Fagerholm

Aaltonen

Kilpivaara

Aittomäki

Blomqvist

(2007). Prognostic Role of HuR in Hereditary Breast Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 6959–6963. 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-07-1432 Heinonen

Hemmes

Salmenkivi

Abdelmohsen

Vilén

S.-T.

Laakso

(2011). Role of RNA Binding Protein HuR in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. J. Pathol. 224, 529–539. 10.1002/path.2889 Hostetter

Licata

L. A.

Costantino

C. L.

Witkiewicz

Yeo

Brody

J. R.

(2008). Cytoplasmic Accumulation of the RNA Binding Protein HuR Is central to Tamoxifen Resistance in Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Biol. Ther. 7, 1496–1506. 10.4161/cbt.7.9.6490 Hufnagel

Hakim

Lima

Hollfelder

(2009). Fluid Phase Endocytosis Contributes to Transfection of DNA by PEI-25. Mol. Ther. 17, 1411–1417. 10.1038/mt.2009.121 Ishihara

Tsuno

Kuwamoto

Yamashita

Endo

Hasegawa

(2014). Hsa-miR-520d Converts Fibroblasts into CD105+ Populations. Drugs R. D 14, 253–264. 10.1007/s40268-014-0064-6 Kakuguchi

Nomura

Kitamura

Otsuguro

Matsushita

Sakaitani

(2018). Suramin, Screened from an Approved Drug Library, Inhibits HuR Functions and Attenuates Malignant Phenotype of Oral Cancer Cells. Cancer Med. 7, 6269–6280. 10.1002/cam4.1877 Kang

M. J.

Ryu

B. K.

Lee

M. G.

Han

Lee

J. H.

T. K.

(2008). NF-κB Activates Transcription of the RNA-Binding Factor HuR, via PI3K-AKT Signaling, to Promote Gastric Tumorigenesis. Gastroenterology 135, 2030–2042. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.009 Kaur

Fields

J. K.

Johnson

D. K.

Lan

Pratt

(2017). The Fungal Natural Product Azaphilone-9 Binds to HuR and Inhibits HuR-RNA Interaction In Vitro . PLoS One 12, e0175471. 10.1371/journal.pone.0175471 Ke

Han

Guo

Wen

Wang

Jiang

(2017). PARP1 Promotes Gene Expression at the post-transcriptional Level by Modulating the RNA-Binding Protein HuR. Nat. Commun. 8, 14632. 10.1038/ncomms14632 Ke

Zhang

Bohio

A. A.

Zeng

(2021). Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation Enhances HuR Oligomerization and Contributes to Pro-inflammatory Gene mRNA Stabilization. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 1817–1835. 10.1007/s00018-020-03618-4 Kim

Jeong

D. E.

Heo

Rho

J. G.

Jung

(2018). Reduced Expression of the RNA-Binding Protein HuD in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Correlates with Low p27Kip1 Levels and Poor Prognosis. J. Pathol. 246, 231–243. 10.1002/path.5135 Kim

H. H.

Abdelmohsen

Lal

Pullmann

Jr. Yang

Galban

(2008). Nuclear HuR Accumulation through Phosphorylation by Cdk1. Genes Dev. 22, 1804–1815. 10.1101/gad.1645808 King

P. H.

(1997). Differential Expression of the Neuroendocrine genesHel-N1 and HuD in Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: Evidence for Down-Regulation of HuD in the Variant Phenotype. Int. J. Cancer 74, 378–382. 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970822)74:4<378::aid-ijc3>3.0.co;2-s Kraushar

M. L.

Thompson

Wijeratne

H. R. S.

Viljetic

Sakers

Marson

J. W.

(2014). Temporally Defined Neocortical Translation and Polysome Assembly Are Determined by the RNA-Binding Protein Hu Antigen R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, E3815–E3824. 10.1073/pnas.1408305111 Krishnamurthy

Rajasingh

Lambers

Qin

Losordo

D. W.

Kishore

(2009). IL-10 Inhibits Inflammation and Attenuates Left Ventricular Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction via Activation of STAT3 and Suppression of HuR. Circ. Res. 104, e9–18. 10.1161/circresaha.108.188243 Lal

Cerofolini

D’Agostino

V. G.

Zucal

Fuccio

Bonomo

(2017). Regulation of HuR Structure and Function by Dihydrotanshinone-I. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 9514–9527. 10.1093/nar/gkx623 Lan

Xiao

Luo

(2018). Long Noncoding RNA OCC-1 Suppresses Cell Growth through Destabilizing HuR Protein in Colorectal Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 5809–5821. 10.1093/nar/gky214 Latorre

Tebaldi

Viero

Spartà

A. M.

Quattrone

Provenzani

(2012). Downregulation of HuR as a New Mechanism of Doxorubicin Resistance in Breast Cancer Cells. Mol. Cancer 11, 13. 10.1186/1476-4598-11-13 Lazarova

D. L.

Spengler

B. A.

Biedler

J. L.

Ross

R. A.

(1999). HuD, a Neuronal-specific RNA-Binding Protein, Is a Putative Regulator of N-Myc Pre-mRNA Processing/stability in Malignant Human Neuroblasts. Oncogene 18, 2703–2710. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202621 Leandersson

Riesbeck

Andersson

(2006). Wnt-5a mRNA Translation Is Suppressed by the Elav-like Protein HuR in Human Breast Epithelial Cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 3988–3999. 10.1093/nar/gkl571 Lee

H. K.

Jeong

(2006). β-Catenin Stabilizes Cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA by Interacting with AU-Rich Elements of 3′-UTR. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 5705–5714. 10.1093/nar/gkl698 Lee

J. H.

Jung

Hong

Kim

M. K.

Chung

I. K.

(2018). Loss of RNA-Binding Protein HuR Facilitates Cellular Senescence through Posttranscriptional Regulation of TIN2 mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 4271–4285. 10.1093/nar/gky223 Legnini

Morlando

Mangiavacchi

Fatica

Bozzoni

(2014). A Feedforward Regulatory Loop between HuR and the Long Noncoding RNA linc-MD1 Controls Early Phases of Myogenesis. Mol. Cell 53, 506–514. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.012 Li

X.-X.

Xiao

Chung

H. K.

X.-X.

Liu

Song

J.-L.

(2020). Interaction between HuR and circPABPN1 Modulates Autophagy in the Intestinal Epithelium by Altering ATG16L1 Translation. Mol. Cell Biol 40 (6), e00492-19. 10.1128/mcb.00492-19 Li

Zheng

Bao

Guo

Zhao

(2015). Circular RNA Is Enriched and Stable in Exosomes: a Promising Biomarker for Cancer Diagnosis. Cell Res 25, 981–984. 10.1038/cr.2015.82 Liu

Yang

Wang

Liu

Wang

(2020). CircBACH1 (Hsa_circ_0061395) Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth by Regulating P27 Repression via HuR. J. Cell Physiol 235, 6929–6941. 10.1002/jcp.29589 Liu

Lan

Chen

Liao

(2021). Circular RNA circDLC1 Inhibits MMP1-Mediated Liver Cancer Progression via Interaction with HuR. Theranostics 11, 1396–1411. 10.7150/thno.53227 Liu

Xiao

Chung

H. K.

Kwon

M. S.

X.-X.

(2019). RNA-binding Protein HuR Regulates Rac1 Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling through Nucleophosmin in the Intestinal Epithelium. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8, 475–486. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.06.002 Liu

Jiang

Xing

Qiao

Zhang

(2020). HuR (Human Antigen R) Regulates the Contraction of Vascular Smooth Muscle and Maintains Blood Pressure. Atvb 40, 943–957. 10.1161/atvbaha.119.313897 Loffreda

Nizzardo

Arosio

Ruepp

M.-D.

Calogero

R. A.

Volinia

(2020). miR-129-5p: A Key Factor and Therapeutic Target in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Prog. Neurobiol. 190, 101803. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101803 Lu

Y.-C.

Chang

S.-H.

Hafner

Tuschl

Elemento

(2014). ELAVL1 Modulates Transcriptome-wide miRNA Binding in Murine Macrophages. Cell Rep. 9, 2330–2343. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.11.030 Lucchesi

Sheikh

M. S.

Huang

(2016). Negative Regulation of RNA-Binding Protein HuR by Tumor-Suppressor ECRG2. Oncogene 35, 2565–2573. 10.1038/onc.2015.339 Lykke-Andersen

Wagner

(2005). Recruitment and Activation of mRNA Decay Enzymes by Two ARE-Mediated Decay Activation Domains in the Proteins TTP and BRF-1. Genes Dev. 19, 351–361. 10.1101/gad.1282305 Marchesi

Thongon

Pascale

Provenzani

Koskela

Korhonen

(2018). Autophagy Stimulus Promotes Early HuR Protein Activation and p62/SQSTM1 Protein Synthesis in ARPE-19 Cells by Triggering Erk1/2, p38MAPK, and JNK Kinase Pathways. Oxidative Med. Cell. longevity 2018, 1–15. 10.1155/2018/4956080 Masuda

Abdelmohsen

Kim

M. M.

Srikantan

Lee

E. K.

Tominaga

(2011). Global Dissociation of HuR-mRNA Complexes Promotes Cell Survival after Ionizing Radiation. Embo j 30, 1040–1053. 10.1038/emboj.2011.24 Matsye

Zheng

Kim

Luo

Crossman

D. K.

(2017). HuR Promotes the Molecular Signature and Phenotype of Activated Microglia: Implications for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Neurodegenerative Diseases. Glia 65, 945–963. 10.1002/glia.23137 Mazan-Mamczarz

Galbán

de Silanes

I. L.

Martindale

J. L.

Atasoy

Keene

J. D.

(2003). RNA-binding Protein HuR Enhances P53 Translation in Response to Ultraviolet Light Irradiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8354–8359. 10.1073/pnas.1432104100 Mazan-Mamczarz

Hagner

P. R.

Corl

Srikantan

Wood

W. H.

Becker

K. G.

(2008). Post-transcriptional Gene Regulation by HuR Promotes a More Tumorigenic Phenotype. Oncogene 27, 6151–6163. 10.1038/onc.2008.215 Mazroui

Di Marco

Clair

von Roretz

Tenenbaum

S. A.

Keene

J. D.

(2008). Caspase-mediated Cleavage of HuR in the Cytoplasm Contributes to Pp32/PHAP-I Regulation of Apoptosis. J. Cell Biol 180, 113–127. 10.1083/jcb.200709030 Meisner

N.-C.

Hintersteiner

Mueller

Bauer

Seifert

J.-M.

Naegeli

H.-U.

(2007). Identification and Mechanistic Characterization of Low-Molecular-Weight Inhibitors for HuR. Nat. Chem. Biol. 3, 508–515. 10.1038/nchembio.2007.14 Meng

King

P. H.

Nabors

L. B.

Jackson

N. L.

Chen

C. Y.

Emanuel

P. D.

(2005). The ELAV RNA-Stability Factor HuR Binds the 5'-untranslated Region of the Human IGF-IR Transcript and Differentially Represses Cap-dependent and IRES-Mediated Translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 2962–2979. 10.1093/nar/gki603 Mitsunari

Miyata

Asai

Matsuo

Shida

Hakariya

(2016). Human Antigen R Is Positively Associated with Malignant Aggressiveness via Upregulation of Cell Proliferation, Migration, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors and Cyclooxygenase-2 in Prostate Cancer. Translational Res. 175, 116–128. 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.04.002 Mukherjee

Ohba

See

W. L.

Phillips

J. J.

Molinaro

A. M.

Pieper

R. O.

(2016). PKM2 Uses Control of HuR Localization to Regulate P27 and Cell Cycle Progression in Human Glioblastoma Cells. Int. J. Cancer 139, 99–111. 10.1002/ijc.30041 Muralidharan

Mehta

Ahmed

Roy

Aubé

(2017). HuR-targeted Small Molecule Inhibitor Exhibits Cytotoxicity towards Human Lung Cancer Cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 9694. 10.1038/s41598-017-07787-4 Myer

V. E.

Fan

X. C.

Steitz

J. A.

(1997). Identification of HuR as a Protein Implicated in AUUUA-Mediated mRNA Decay. Embo j 16, 2130–2139. 10.1093/emboj/16.8.2130 Nabors

L. B.

Gillespie

G. Y.

Harkins

King

P. H.

(2001). HuR, a RNA Stability Factor, Is Expressed in Malignant Brain Tumors and Binds to Adenine- and Uridine-Rich Elements within the 3' Untranslated Regions of Cytokine and Angiogenic Factor mRNAs. Cancer Res. 61, 2154–2161. http://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/61/5/2154/2493096/ch050102154.pdf. Ohwada

Nagaoka

Takahashi

Tominaga

Fukuchi

(1999). DNA Vaccination against HuD Antigen Elicits Antitumor Activity in a Small-Cell Lung Cancer Murine Model. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol Biol 21, 37–43. 10.1165/ajrcmb.21.1.3625 Peng

W.-X.

Koirala

Zhang

Wang

Yang

(2020). lncRNA RMST Enhances DNMT3 Expression through Interaction with HuR. Mol. Ther. 28, 9–18. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.09.024 Quattrone

Pascale

Nogues

Zhao

Gusev

Pacini

(2001). Posttranscriptional Regulation of Gene Expression in Learning by the Neuronal ELAV-like mRNA-Stabilizing Proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98, 11668–11673. 10.1073/pnas.191388398 Raspaglio

De Maria

Filippetti

Martinelli

Zannoni

G. F.

Prislei

(2010). HuR Regulates β-Tubulin Isotype Expression in Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res. 70, 5891–5900. 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-09-4656 Ripin

Boudet

Duszczyk

M. M.

Hinniger

Faller

Krepl

(2019). Molecular Basis for AU-Rich Element Recognition and Dimerization by the HuR C-Terminal RRM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2935–2944. 10.1073/pnas.1808696116 Rogulja-Ortmann

Picao-Osorio

Villava

Patraquim

Lafuente

Aspden

(2014). The RNA-Binding Protein ELAV Regulates Hox RNA Processing, Expression and Function within the Drosophila Nervous System. Development 141, 2046–2056. 10.1242/dev.101519 Schultz

C. W.

Preet

Dhir

Dixon

D. A.

Brody

J. R.

(2020). Understanding and Targeting the Disease‐related RNA Binding Protein Human Antigen R (HuR). Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 11, e1581. 10.1002/wrna.1581 Shen

Han

Wang

Meng

Chen

Liu

(2019). Cachexia-related Long Noncoding RNA, CAAlnc1, Suppresses Adipogenesis by Blocking the Binding of HuR to Adipogenic Transcription Factor mRNAs. Int. J. Cancer 145, 1809–1821. 10.1002/ijc.32236 Siang

D. T. C.

Lim

Y. C.

Kyaw

A. M. M.

Win

K. N.

Chia

S. Y.

Degirmenci

(2020). The RNA-Binding Protein HuR Is a Negative Regulator in Adipogenesis. Nat. Commun. 11, 213. 10.1038/s41467-019-14001-8 Simion

Zhou

Haemmig

Pierce

J. B.

Mendes

Tesmenitsky

(2020). A Macrophage-specific lncRNA Regulates Apoptosis and Atherosclerosis by Tethering HuR in the Nucleus. Nat. Commun. 11, 6135. 10.1038/s41467-020-19664-2 Skliris

Papadaki

Kafasla

Karakasiliotis

Hazapis

Reczko

(2015). Neuroprotection Requires the Functions of the RNA-Binding Protein HuR. Cell Death Differ 22, 703–718. 10.1038/cdd.2014.158 Song

VanBuskirk

J. A.

Merbs

S. L.

(2022). Regulation of Opsin Gene Expression by DNA Methylation and Histone Acetylation. Ijms 23, 1408. 10.3390/ijms23031408 Sun

Han

Zhai

Zhao

Qian

(2022). Dihydrotanshinone I Inhibits Ovarian Tumor Growth by Activating Oxidative Stress through Keap1-Mediated Nrf2 Ubiquitination Degradation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 180, 220–235. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.01.015 Suswam

E. A.

Nabors

L. B.

Huang

Yang

King

P. H.

(2005). IL-1? Induces Stabilization of IL-8 mRNA in Malignant Breast Cancer Cellsvia the 3? Untranslated Region: Involvement of Divergent RNA-Binding Factors HuR, KSRP and TIAR. Int. J. Cancer 113, 911–919. 10.1002/ijc.20675 Toba

White

(2008). The Third RNA Recognition Motif of Drosophila ELAV Protein Has a Role in Multimerization. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 1390–1399. 10.1093/nar/gkm1168 Wang

Tidei

J. J.

Polich

E. D.

Gao

Zhao

Perrone-Bizzozero

N. I.

(2015). Positive Feedback between RNA-Binding Protein HuD and Transcription Factor SATB1 Promotes Neurogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E4995–E5004. 10.1073/pnas.1513780112 Wang

Leavenworth

J. W.

Hjelmeland

A. B.

Smith

Patel

Borg

(2019). Deletion of the RNA Regulator HuR in Tumor‐associated Microglia and Macrophages Stimulates Anti‐tumor Immunity and Attenuates Glioma Growth. Glia 67, 2424–2439. 10.1002/glia.23696 Wang

Caldwell

M. C.

Lin

Furneaux

Gorospe

(2000). HuR Regulates Cyclin A and Cyclin B1 mRNA Stability during Cell Proliferation. Embo j 19, 2340–2350. 10.1093/emboj/19.10.2340 Wang

Gao

Tang

Tong

(2021). Downregulation of Hsa_circ_0074854 Suppresses the Migration and Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Interacting with HuR and via Suppressing Exosomes-Mediated Macrophage M2 Polarization. Ijn 16, 2803–2818. 10.2147/ijn.S284560 Wang

Guo

Tang

Han

Sun

(2019). Developmental Cytoplasmic-To-Nuclear Translocation of RNA-Binding Protein HuR Is Required for Adult Neurogenesis. Cell Rep. 29, 3101–3117. e3107. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.127 Wen

Chen

Cui

(2021). LncRNA NONHSAT009968 Inhibits the Osteogenic Differentiation of hBMMSCs in SA-Induced Inflammation via Wnt3a. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 577, 24–31. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.08.086 Woo

H.-H.

Zhou

David

C. L.

Zheng

Gilmore-Hebert

(2009). Regulation of Non-AU-rich Element Containing C-Fms Proto-Oncogene Expression by HuR in Breast Cancer. Oncogene 28, 1176–1186. 10.1038/onc.2008.469 Wu

Gardashova

Lan

Han

Zhong

Marquez

R. T.

(2020). Targeting the Interaction between RNA-Binding Protein HuR and FOXQ1 Suppresses Breast Cancer Invasion and Metastasis. Commun. Biol. 3, 193. 10.1038/s42003-020-0933-1 Wu

Lan

Wilson

D. M.

Marquez

R. T.

Tsao

W.-c.

Gao

(2015). Identification and Validation of Novel Small Molecule Disruptors of HuR-mRNA Interaction. ACS Chem. Biol. 10, 1476–1484. 10.1021/cb500851u Xie

Xue

Sun

Zhang

(2019). The Long Intergenic Non-protein Coding RNA 707 Promotes Proliferation and Metastasis of Gastric Cancer by Interacting with mRNA Stabilizing Protein HuR. Cancer Lett. 443, 67–79. 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.11.032 Yang

Wang

Guo

Liu

(2019). Circ-HuR Suppresses HuR Expression and Gastric Cancer Progression by Inhibiting CNBP Transactivation. Mol. Cancer 18, 158. 10.1186/s12943-019-1094-z Yano

Hayakawa‐Yano

Okano

(2016). RNA Regulation Went Wrong in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: The Example of Msi/Elavl RNA Binding Proteins. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 55, 124–130. 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2016.01.002 Young

L. E.

Sanduja

Bemis–Standoli

Pena

E. A.

Price

R. L.

Dixon

D. A.

(2009). The mRNA Binding Proteins HuR and Tristetraprolin Regulate Cyclooxygenase 2 Expression during colon Carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 136, 1669–1679. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.010 Zang

Wan

Tai

(2020). circRNA circ‐CCND1 Promotes the Proliferation of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma through Elevating CCND1 Expression via Interacting with HuR and miR‐646. J. Cell Mol Med 24, 2423–2433. 10.1111/jcmm.14925 Zaragozá

Álvarez-Mon

M. Á.

Zaragozá

Villaescusa

(2022). Flavonoids: Antiplatelet Effect as Inhibitors of COX-1. Molecules 27, 1146. 10.3390/molecules27031146 Zhang

Han

Yang

Sun

Huang

(2020). Circular RNA circPPM1F Modulates M1 Macrophage Activation and Pancreatic Islet Inflammation in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Theranostics 10, 10908–10924. 10.7150/thno.48264 Zhang

L. F.

Lou

J. T.

M. H.

Gao

Zhao

(2015). Suppression of miR‐199a Maturation by HuR Is Crucial for Hypoxia‐induced Glycolytic Switch in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Embo j 34, 2671–2685. 10.15252/embj.201591803 Zhang

Lee

M. D.

Buckley

Wilson

McCarron

J. G.

(2022). Mitochondria Regulate TRPV4‐mediated Release of ATP. Br. J Pharmacol. 179, 1017–1032. 10.1111/bph.15687 Zhao

Sun

Wang

(2020). HuR Stabilizes HTT mRNA via Interacting with its Exon 11 in a Mutant HTT-dependent Manner. RNA Biol. 17, 500–516. 10.1080/15476286.2020.1712894 Zhao

W. S.

Yan

W. P.

Chen

D. B.

Dai

Yang

Y. B.

Kang

X. Z.

(2019). Genome-scale CRISPR Activation Screening Identifies a Role of ELAVL2-Cdkn1a axis in Paclitaxel Resistance in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 9, 1183–1200. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC6610048/pdf/ajcr0009-1183.pdf. Zhao

Y.-F.

X.-X.

Song

Z.-F.

Guo

Zhang

Y.-N.

H.-L.

(2020). Human Antigen R-Regulated mRNA Metabolism Promotes the Cell Motility of Migrating Neurons. Development 147. 10.1242/dev.183509 Zhou

Telonis

A. G.

Jing

Xia

N. L.

Biederman

Jimbo

(2016). GPRC5A Is a Potential Oncogene in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells that Is Upregulated by Gemcitabine with Help from HuR. Cell Death Dis 7–e2294. 10.1038/cddis.2016.169 Zhu

Yang

Luan

Cui

(2020). Discovery of the Anti-angiogenesis Effect of Eltrombopag in Breast Cancer through Targeting of HuR Protein. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 10, 1414–1425. 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.02.007

Glossary

AGAP2

ArfGAP with GTPase domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 2

AGAP2-AS1

AGAP2 antisense RNA 1

AGO2

Argonaute 2

APOA4-AS

Rho GTPase activating protein 21

ARE

AU-rich element

ASB16

ankyrin repeat and SOCS box containing 16

ASB16-AS1

ASB16 antisense RNA 1

ATG16L1

Autophagy Related 16 Like 1

B4GALT1-AS1

B4GALT1 Antisense RNA 1

BRCA

breast cancer;

CAAlnc1

cachexia-related anti-adipogenesis lncRNA 1

CircAGO2

circular RNA Argonaute 2

circBACH1

circular RNA BTB Domain and CNC Homolog 1

circ-CCND1

circular RNA Cyclin D1

circDLC1

circular RNA DLC1

circ-HuR

circular RNA ELAV Like RNA Binding Protein 1

circRHOBTB3

circular RNA RHOBTB3

circRNA

circular RNA

COX-2

cyclooxygenase 2

cleavage products

CX43

Connexin 43

DNMT3B

DNA methyltransferase 3B

eEF2

Eukaryotic Translation Elongation Fa

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

EGFR-AS1

EGFR antisense RNA 1

eIF2a

Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 2A

ELAVL proteins

Embryonic lethal abnormal vision-like proteins

FAM83H-AS1

family with sequence similarity 83 member H antisense RNA 1

FENDRR

FOXF1 adjacent non-coding developmental regulatory RNA

HCT116

human colon cancer cells 116

Hel-N1

human elav-like neuronal protein 1

HMS

HOXC10 mRNA stabilizing factor

HOXB

homeobox B cluster

HOXB-AS1

HOXB cluster antisense RNA 1

HTT

Huntingtin

HuB

human antigen B

HuC

human antigen C

HuD

human antigen D

HuR

human antigen R

interleukin

IRES

internal ribosome entry site

lincRNA-UFC1

long intergenic noncoding RNA UFC1

lncRNA

Long non-coding RNA

MAARS

Macrophage-Associated Atherosclerosis

MALAT1

metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1

MD1

muscle differentiation 1

MIR100HG

mir-100-let-7a-2-mir-125b-1 cluster host gene

miRNA

micro RNA

mRNA

message RNA

ncRNA

non-coding RNA

NF-κB

Nuclear Factor-kappa B

OCC-1

Overexpressed in colon carcinoma-1

OIP5

Opa interacting protein 5

OIP5-AS1

OIP5 antisense RNA 1

OSER1

oxidative stress responsive serine rich 1

OSER1-AS1

OSER1 antisense RNA 1

p27

protein 27

p53

protein 53

P62

protein 62

PARP1

poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1

PFN1

profilin 1

PIM1

Pim-1 Proto-Oncogene, Serine/Threonine Kinase

PPM1F

Protein Phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ Dependent 1F

PTBP1

Polypyrimidine Tract Binding Protein 1

RBP

RNA-binding protein

RMST

habdomyosarcoma 2-Associated Transcript

ROS

reactive oxygen species

RPSAP52

ribosomal protein SA pseudogene 52

RRM

RNA recognition motif

SATB1

sequence-binding protein 1

SCLC

small cell lung cancer

SNHG7

small nucleolar RNA host gene 7

SPRY4

sprouty RTK signaling antagonist 4

SPRY4-IT1

SPRY4 intronic transcript 1

tie1AS

tie1 locus-tie1 antisense

TIN2

TRF1-interacting nuclear protein 2

TRN2

transportin-2

TSLNC8

Tumor suppressor long noncoding RNA on chromosome 8p12

TUBB3

Tubulin Beta 3 Class III

TUG1

aurine up-regulated 1

UTR

untranslated region

Ultraviolet Rays

Wnt-5a

Wnt Family Member 5A

XIAP

X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis

ZEB1

zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1

ZEB1-AS1

ZEB1 antisense RNA 1.