<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Built Environ.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Built Environment</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Built Environ.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2297-3362</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1761692</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbuil.2026.1761692</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Improving construction efficiency through lean techniques and digital tools: case of a real-time implementation in an institutional building construction</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Mohan et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2026.1761692">10.3389/fbuil.2026.1761692</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mohan</surname>
<given-names>Kishore Kumar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3387550"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal Analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tomy</surname>
<given-names>Diyana</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3390571"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vasukuttan</surname>
<given-names>Anjana</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3388108"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal Analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ramani</surname>
<given-names>Prasanna Venkatesan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3117631"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Akomah</surname>
<given-names>Benjamin Boahene</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3392227"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &#x26; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<institution>School of Civil Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology</institution>, <city>Vellore</city>, <state>Tamil Nadu</state>, <country country="IN">India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<institution>School of Built and Natural Environment, Department of Construction Technology and Management, Cape Coast Technical University</institution>, <city>Cape Coast</city>, <country country="GH">Ghana</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">
<label>&#x2a;</label>Correspondence: Prasanna Venkatesan Ramani, <email xlink:href="mailto:prasanna.venkatesan@vit.ac.in">prasanna.venkatesan@vit.ac.in</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-26">
<day>26</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1761692</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>05</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>21</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>28</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Mohan, Tomy, Vasukuttan, Ramani and Akomah.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Mohan, Tomy, Vasukuttan, Ramani and Akomah</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-26">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Constructions continue to be plagued with waste, cost-overrun, delays and poor real-time coordination. However, the integrated implementation of both lean construction and digital tools (e.g. BIM, business intelligence) have not been extensively investigated under real-time project settings despite their respective capabilities in boosting performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>This research utilised a Lean&#x2013;Digital integrated methodology in the context of a building project at an institutional scale located in Vellore. Activities were categorized as value-adding (VA), non-value-adding (NVA) and necessary non-value-adding (NVAN) using Value Stream Mapping (VSM). A 4D/5D BIM model in Autodesk Revit was synchronised with Power BI dashboards via Speckle for online monitoring. Workflows (Power Automate) were built to create automatic alerts and approvals. Performance was tested in the field during a 4-month observation period.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Lean construction interventions decreased the duration of excavations by 15% and saved 2.06% (234.88hours) total in a project&#x2019;s time span. Real time digital dashboards led to better communication with parties involved, minimized delays in approval and constituted more transparency in monitoring progress. The automated workflows accelerated reporting cycles and increased agility in the decision-making process.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The findings demonstrate that integrating lean process optimization with digital monitoring platforms creates measurable efficiency gains and enhances proactive project management. The proposed framework supports data-driven decision-making and offers a scalable model for improving construction productivity through synchronized Lean&#x2013;Digital implementation.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>construction management</kwd>
<kwd>lean construction</kwd>
<kwd>lean-BIM integration</kwd>
<kwd>power BI</kwd>
<kwd>value stream mapping</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="14"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="23"/>
<page-count count="18"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Construction Management</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The construction industry is still facing the chronic problems of efficiency, cost overruns, project delays, and underutilization of resources. Conventional project management practices in the industry are reactive: they lack structured protocols for systematically detecting sources of waste or monitoring work site conditions on a real-time basis. New digital and lean construction tools have the potential to produce significant productivity gains to address these four challenges.</p>
<p>Lean construction aims to identify where to add the value and remove the waste in the construction value chain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ramani and Lingan, 2019</xref>). Value Stream Mapping (VSM), a lean tool for analyzing and redesigning the process segregates the activities into those adding value and those that do not add value to the operation and practices in this context. As a recent trend, waste categories like material handling and approval lags are targeted by VSM deployment in construction, which brings about reduction in project cycle times especially at the downstream end (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Morato and Ferreira, 2024</xref>). To complement the above and to fit waste reduction into the overall realm of smart sustainable development, VSM has also been used to map environmental and social aspects in a recent study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Batwara et al., 2023</xref>). At the same time, with its shared and data-rich virtual representation of the functional and physical characteristics of a project, Building Information Modeling (BIM) has also driven technological adoption in the construction sector to a great extent. The potential of BIM can be multiplied when it is complimented by Business Intelligence (BI) tools like Power BI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Mane and Mhaske, 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Some studies suggest that by connecting BI dashboards with BIM data, transparency and early identification of project deviations can be achieved (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Di Giuda et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gajera, 2023</xref>). The digital twin, enabling the cloud-based real-time synchronous connection with predictive analyses and improving lean management capacity, defines this further evolution as the next stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jiang et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Owais et al., 2024</xref>). Lean implementation is prevalent, and digital tools have had success; however, it is not known to its full extent how end-to-end integration of Lean concepts with digital tools can produce a synergy effect.</p>
<p>This paper investigates how a lean-digital approach was put into practice on a major institutional building project. It carefully examines how well VSM works for process optimization and how BIM, Speckle, Power BI dashboards, and Power Automate workflows can be used in tandem to improve stakeholder participation, transparency, and communication. To provide data-driven insights into the measurable benefits of leveraging both lean and digital tools to improve construction project delivery, this paper provides an actionable case study.</p>
<p>Although tools and techniques from the Lean methodology, such as VSM are widely used for non-value-added activities identification&#x2002;in construction and despite the advances made by a significant number of LCM studies across various industry sectors we have found that research, practical recommendations in terms of theoretical implementation and integration with digital real-time monitoring systems remain limited. Likewise, planning and visualization-tools for BIM&#x2002;used on the building site are widespread, but there is a lack of empirical validation to what extent they actually affect measurable performance throughout the project and production feedback loops. In construction, however, both&#x2002;process optimization focusing on inefficient processes and real-time data sharing, monitoring and decision-making are necessary in practice. Hence, in this work. We attempted to fill this gap by presenting and applying an integrated Lean&#x2013;Digital framework consisting of VSM, BIM modeling, Speckle-based&#x2002;data sync., and Power BI dashboards for monitoring measurable project performance indicators on an ongoing project in Vellore. The proposed process is validated through a 4-month field observatory period, which provides quantitative measurement such as time saving in the excavation process and&#x2002;sensor-on time to communication latency: RFI response within two working days.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Literature review</title>
<p>Two complementary streams of recent research on construction efficiency are the use of data-driven digital platforms for real-time project visibility and control and the application of lean methodologies such as VSM to identify and eliminate process waste.</p>
<p>Several VSM applications in construction are identified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Morato and Ferreira (2024)</xref> through a systematic review, indicating that the application of the methodology in an iterative manner with the stakeholder involvement has generally been able to deliver reductions in cycle frequency. This reinforces that VSM is a successful tool to find and remove wastes such as downtime, material travel, and approval waits. Towards smart and key sustainable development goals for systematic removal of the waste, studies on recent perspectives widen this basis by incorporating environmental and social perspectives into VSM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Batwara et al., 2023</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Michaud et al. (2019)</xref>, VSM could be effectively applied to digital processes themselves, e.g., streamlining BIM information flows in order to minimize the amount of time it requires for data transfer.</p>
<p>On the digital side, however, the most important factor influencing data management is the combination of BIM and BI. According to research, connecting BIM data to Power BI dashboards enables planners to see time (4D) and cost (5D) optimization centrally and interactively, allowing them to see departures much earlier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Mane and Mhaske, 2024</xref>). This solution enhances real-time cost tracking and data insights by enabling drill-down exploration for managers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gajera, 2023</xref>). More refined BIM-BI integrations for facility management can be realized through advanced applications, where complex model-based data can be translated into extensive dashboards for informed decision-making (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Di Giuda et al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Roxo et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The crossover of these digital technologies that integrates lean principles for real-time visibility and predictive analytics is an area on the rise. Digital solutions enable dynamic construction process visualizations that help teams identify non-value-added activities and promote teamwork and transparency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Owais et al., 2024</xref>). This idea develops from static models into a Synchronized Construction Management agenda and provides strategies for connecting the virtual twin model and the physical site in real time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jiang et al., 2024</xref>). Additional technological developments can include employing open BIM standards to guarantee data verification continuously throughout a project&#x2019;s life cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Otranto et al., 2025</xref>) and integrating BIM with game engines to improve stakeholder collaboration in order to overcome interoperability barriers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Rehman et al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>Ultimately, comprehensive systems that combine multiple digital tools with lean principles would reap the greatest benefits. Performance improvements have been reported in studies on Lean-BIM methodologies, particularly in the project design stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Hammi et al., 2023</xref>). In a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jiang et al. (2024)</xref>, BIM combined with QR-based tracking and future-state VSM showed a 12% increase in labor productivity and an 18% decrease in idle time. Higher-level conceptual models like coordination of BIM, IoT, and GIS could enable better resource management and collaborative decision-making (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Liu et al., 2025</xref>). Some significant representative studies, their methods, and their outcomes are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Representative studies (methods and outcomes).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Source</th>
<th align="center">Context</th>
<th align="center">Methods</th>
<th align="center">Reported outcomes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Newhouse et al. (2025)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">Enterprise visibility challenges with TLS 1.3</td>
<td align="center">High-level document analysis</td>
<td align="center">Best practices for TLS 1.3 visibility</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Liu et al. (2025)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM, IoT, and GIS integration in resource monitoring</td>
<td align="center">Case study; dashboard implementation</td>
<td align="center">Real-time monitoring of resources</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Otranto et al. (2025)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">Open BIM solutions for FM interoperability</td>
<td align="center">Survey; solution prototyping</td>
<td align="center">Improved operations efficiency</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Rehman et al. (2025)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">Game engine&#x2013;BIM integration in AEC</td>
<td align="center">Mixed-method interviews and experiments</td>
<td align="center">Identified integration challenges</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jiang et al. (2024)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">Digital twin&#x2013;enabled synchronized construction management</td>
<td align="center">Roadmap development; literature review</td>
<td align="center">Prospects for construction 4.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdelghany and Shokri (2021)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM as a lean management tool</td>
<td align="center">Case study</td>
<td align="center">Waste reduction in construction processes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Abedini et al. (2021)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM and digital twinning for lean practices</td>
<td align="center">Experimental framework; pilot implementation</td>
<td align="center">Sustainable construction improvements</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Aliakbar et al. (2024)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM to digital twin conceptual framework</td>
<td align="center">Conceptual modeling; framework validation</td>
<td align="center">Enhanced interoperability</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Owais et al. (2024)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">Digital twins enabling lean construction levels</td>
<td align="center">Conference proceedings; simulation-enabled VSM</td>
<td align="center">Lean process improvements</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Di Giuda et al. (2024)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM, GIS, and BI tools for university asset management</td>
<td align="center">Case study</td>
<td align="center">Optimized space and occupancy</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Mane and Mhaske (2024)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM planning for time and cost optimization with power BI</td>
<td align="center">Dashboard implementation</td>
<td align="center">Cost and schedule optimization</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Morato and Ferreira (2024)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">VSM for loss and waste reduction in construction</td>
<td align="center">Systematic literature review</td>
<td align="center">Waste reduction benchmarks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Batwara et al. (2023)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">Smart sustainable development through VSM</td>
<td align="center">Bibliometric analysis; systematic review</td>
<td align="center">Trends in VSM for sustainability</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gajera R. (2023)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM&#x2013;Power BI integration for cost tracking</td>
<td align="center">Case study</td>
<td align="center">Budget variance reduction</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Hammi et al. (2023)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">Lean&#x2013;BIM in the design phase for performance improvement</td>
<td align="center">Experimental study</td>
<td align="center">Design phase performance gains</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Li et al. (2024)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">NLP model for facility management in digital twins</td>
<td align="center">Model development: Case study</td>
<td align="center">Improved facilities data management</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Roxo et al. (2022)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM with a BI tool for construction management</td>
<td align="center">Case study</td>
<td align="center">Enhanced project analytics</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Michaud et al. (2019)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">Lean approach to optimize BIM information flow</td>
<td align="center">Value Stream Mapping; process analysis</td>
<td align="center">Optimized information flow</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Gunduz and Naser (2017)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">Cost-based VSM for underground pipeline projects</td>
<td align="center">VSM with cost analysis</td>
<td align="center">Sustainable cost management</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ramalingam, S. (2018)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM process mapping for lean teaching</td>
<td align="center">Conference proceedings</td>
<td align="center">Improved BIM education methodologies</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Patel et al. (2021)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">VSM integrated with a foreman delay survey</td>
<td align="center">Process improvement methodology</td>
<td align="center">Reduced foreman delays</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Zekhnini et al. (2022)</xref>
</td>
<td align="center">BIM&#x2013;Power BI for data extraction and visualization</td>
<td align="center">Photogrammetry archives implementation</td>
<td align="center">Enhanced visualization and reporting</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>In summary, the existing studies have provided clear evidence that innovations like the BIM-to-BI pipeline allow for project status to become transparent so as to take proactive actions, and VSM can always be applied to effectively spot and remove non-value-adding steps. An integrated approach that combines lean, BIM, and other digital tools is said to be crucial in terms of narrowing the &#x201c;big&#x201d; divide between data analytics and managerial decisions. By operationalizing a full lean-digital loop that links VSM-based process enhancements with real-time BIM-to-Power BI dashboards and automated alerts, as well as by measuring its schedule impact on a large-scale institutional project in India, this study makes a useful, practical contribution.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s3">
<label>3</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>The study followed a two-pronged approach: (i) laying the base for the study&#x2019;s methodology by reviewing the latest research in the domain of lean-digital integration and (ii) field-based interventions conducted using digital dashboards, VSM, and BIM supported by workflow automation.</p>
<p>An institutional building construction project was selected to apply VSM and measuring the changes to Value-Adding (VA)/Non-Value Adding (NVA)/Non-Value Adding but Necessary (NVAN) activities, stream live BIM data via Speckle to Power BI, and automate alerts with Power Automate.</p>
<sec id="s3-1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Literature-guided methodology</title>
<p>From the methodology perspective, the structure of the study approaches two streams of related literature: digital integration and lean construction. From studies, iterative VSM cycles involving workshops among stakeholders have been proved to systematically reduce project duration and eliminate non-value-adding activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Morato and Ferreira, 2024</xref>). To show how VSM can help achieve the larger sustainability goals, it also has been extended by integrating environmental, social, and economic aspects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Batwara et al., 2023</xref>). Meanwhile, other investigators have emphasized team-level engagement and formatted VA/NVA/NVAN descriptions in a clear manner to enhance the clarity of workflow.</p>
<p>In the digital realm, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Mane and Mhaske (2024)</xref> validated that BIM-to-Power BI dashboards can support real-time visibility of the metric at a 4D/5D project granularity level, increasing transparency and evidence-based decision-making. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Di Giuda et al. (2024)</xref> created an interactive platform for facility management (FM) and further demonstrated the context of cyclic project events. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Owais et al. (2024)</xref> deployed an automatic VSM system to gather data of machines from different sources so that the areas where it can be improved can be identified and digital twin was proposed as a method of enhancing VSM in terms of real time tracking and predictive analysis. Advanced integrations such as the open BIM-FM framework and the BIM game-engine provide for interoperability issues and ongoing data validation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Otranto et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Rehman et al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>Case studies from the industry demonstrate the real-world effects of automation. For instance, Morgan Construction has integrated Power BI into employee onboarding to eliminate manual errors, and Downer New Zealand has integrated Flow Forma-Power Automate-GIS to automate 23 site processes, reducing administrative load and improving safety. The usefulness of BIM-IoT-GIS integration in resource management has also been reviewed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Liu et al., 2025</xref>), as has the creation of strategic roadmaps for digital twin construction management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jiang et al., 2024</xref>). Together, these show that in order to completely address construction inefficiencies and produce quantifiable gains, lean process mapping must be integrated with real-time digital tools.</p>
<p>The existing body of work shows that inefficiencies cannot be overcome by lean or digital interventions&#x2002;in isolation. This also influenced the integrated approach adopted for the study, which combined real-time digital tools in Phase II with lean process mapping in Phase I to produce quantifiable efficiency benefits.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Research design and phases</title>
<p>The research was carried out in five stages, with reference to the design of work presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>. The study started with a comprehensive review which articulated the holes in lean&#x2013;digital integration. Secondly, to assess the baseline performance of the project case study diagnostics were applied using onsite visits, interviews with stakeholders and workflow capture. Third, to minimize waste and improve flow in Phase I (Lean Intervention), each task was classified as either VA, NVA or NVAN, current processes were mapped on &#x2018;current state&#x2019; value stream diagrams, and future state redesigns with the site teams were initiated.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Research design.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart showing five steps: literature review to identify gaps in Lean&#x2013;digital integration, case study diagnostics, Phase I Lean intervention with VSM mapping, Phase II digital integration, and evaluation of time savings and improved communication.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Fourth, a BIM model was generated in Autodesk Revit (central). For streaming the models live into Power BI dashboards for real time 4D/5D visualization, Speckle was used and Power Automate workflows were established to trigger automated alerts on task completion, approval or deviation. Finally, during the evaluation period, performance metrics including time saved, delays avoided and improvements to communication and decision-making with the integrated lean&#x2013;digital intervention were triangulated.</p>
<sec id="s3-2-1">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Data collection and validation approach</title>
<p>The observations were obtained from a real&#x2002;time construction site in Vellore. Process flow, length of activities, delays and communication cycles were observed for 4&#xa0;months&#x2002;on-site. Information was gathered from a variety of sources including site visits, MS&#x2002;Project schedule tracking, workflow mapping interviews, and documentation. Value-adding (VA), Non-value adding (NVA), and Non-value added but necessary (NVAN) elements were determined through site workflow analysis and then because of direct validation with&#x2002;the project manager.</p>
<p>MS Project was used for development of project schedule&#x2002;baseline and the revised schedules. Efficiency gains were assessed by comparing the duration of the baseline workflow with that&#x2002;of optimized workflow after Lean intervention. Efficiency of communication was also measured with RFI turnaround time labour and the average response time to any given question was approximately two working days&#x2002;under the protocol described.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Lean process mapping and iterative intervention</title>
<p>Value Stream Maps were produced for the operations of excavation, foundation, superstructure and finishing which are vital in construction process. With kanaka input and direct measurement, &#x201c;Current state&#x201d; maps revealed the amount of time spent in VA, NVAN and NVA activities. Collaborative workshops were facilitated to &#x201c;future state&#x201d; map, and match with project reality to prioritize actionable interventions. Validation through periodic mapping and process optimization improved results: 15% reduction in excavation time and total scheduling gain of at least 2.06%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Digital platform integration</title>
<p>For the major work tasks including excavation, foundation, superstructure and finishing, Autodesk Revit would house the BIM models while Speckle allowed its bi-directional real-time data transfer to Power BI dashboards for reporting in dynamically visualized construction progress tracking information: material flow measurements as well as schedule keeping. Power Automate-enabled workflows notified in response to major turning points, deviations or approval requirements as they occurred in real time. In the dashboard space, row-level controls were implemented for security and privacy.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<label>4</label>
<title>Implementation</title>
<p>The implementation strategy, which was carried out in two significant stages, combined digital innovation with lean methods:</p>
<p>Phase I: VSM-based lean construction optimization.</p>
<p>Phase II: Linking the real-time data from BIM and the model management platform Speckle to a Power BI dashboard for digital monitoring.</p>
<sec id="s4-1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Phase I: lean methodology using VSM</title>
<p>Site clearance, excavations, foundation and trucking works were the main project activities that were mapped and classified as being either necessary-but-non-value-adding (NVAN), non-value adding (NVA) or value-adding (VA) during the Lean optimisation exercise. The detailed break-up of the number of these tasks is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. To pinpoint waste sources and processing delays, particularly those caused by handoffs and approval cycles, this detailed categorization was done through structured interview, direct site observation, and review of project records.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>VA/NVA/NVAN activities identification.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">ID</th>
<th align="left">Active</th>
<th align="left">Name</th>
<th align="left">Duration</th>
<th align="left">Notes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Construction of institutional building</td>
<td align="left">468&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Viv 2 project institutional building phase II</td>
<td align="left">468&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Site possession to contractor</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">NVA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Survey point (R.L)</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">NVA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">56</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Institutional building (A BLOCK)</td>
<td align="left">468&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">57</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Sub structure</td>
<td align="left">180&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">58</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Excavation</td>
<td align="left">67&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">59</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Site clearing</td>
<td align="left">11&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">60</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Earth work excavation incl. Hard rock</td>
<td align="left">56&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">61</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Foundation works</td>
<td align="left">54&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">62</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Dressing the surface</td>
<td align="left">54&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">63</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">PCC</td>
<td align="left">20&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">64</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Waterproofing works</td>
<td align="left">25&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">65</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Foundation concrete</td>
<td align="left">45&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">66</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Column and retaining wall upto basement floor</td>
<td align="left">56&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">67</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Starter concrete</td>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">68</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RCC columns</td>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">69</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Retaining wall</td>
<td align="left">40&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">70</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Back filling work-up to grade slab PCC bottom lvl</td>
<td align="left">45&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">71</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Basement floor level</td>
<td align="left">50&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">72</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">PCC</td>
<td align="left">35&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">73</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Reinforcement steel work</td>
<td align="left">35&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">74</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Grade slab concrete works</td>
<td align="left">45&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">75</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Basement roof slab</td>
<td align="left">55&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">76</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Pour 1</td>
<td align="left">28&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">77</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RCC column up to slab</td>
<td align="left">10&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">78</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab shuttering work</td>
<td align="left">18&#xa0;Days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">79</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab reinforcement work</td>
<td align="left">16&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">80</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Electrical conducting</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">81</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RFI clearance</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">NVA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">82</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab concreting work</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">83</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Deshuttering</td>
<td align="left">14&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">NVAN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">84</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Pour 2</td>
<td align="left">28&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">85</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RCC columns up to slab</td>
<td align="left">10&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">86</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab shuttering work &#x2013;(incl staircase)</td>
<td align="left">18&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">87</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab reinforcement work</td>
<td align="left">16&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">88</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Electrical conducting</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">89</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RFI clearance</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">NVA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">90</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab concreting work (including staircase)</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">91</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Deshuttering</td>
<td align="left">14&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">NVAN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">92</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Pour 3</td>
<td align="left">28&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">93</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RCC columns up to slab</td>
<td align="left">10&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">94</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab shuttering work (including staircase)</td>
<td align="left">18&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">95</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab reinforcement work</td>
<td align="left">16&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">96</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Electrical conducting</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">97</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RFI clearance</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">NVA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">98</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab concreting work (including staircase)</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">99</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">De shuttering</td>
<td align="left">14&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">NVAN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">100</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Pour 4</td>
<td align="left">28&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">101</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RCC columns up to slab</td>
<td align="left">10&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">102</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab shuttering work</td>
<td align="left">18&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">103</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab reinforcement work</td>
<td align="left">16&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">104</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Electrical conducting</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">105</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RFI clearance</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">NVAN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">106</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab concreting work</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">107</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">De shuttering</td>
<td align="left">14&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">NVAN</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">108</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Pour 5</td>
<td align="left">28&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">109</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RCC columns up to slab</td>
<td align="left">10&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">110</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab shuttering work (including staircase)</td>
<td align="left">18&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">111</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab reinforcement work</td>
<td align="left">16&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">112</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Electrical conducting</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">113</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">RFI clearance</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">NVA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">114</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">Slab concreting work (including staircase)</td>
<td align="left">1&#xa0;day</td>
<td align="left">VA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">115</td>
<td align="left">Yes</td>
<td align="left">De shuttering</td>
<td align="left">14&#xa0;days</td>
<td align="left">NVAN</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Two types of VSM diagrams were created: the current state map, visualizing the present flow of activities and the future state map, indicating a sequence of steps for improvement in the future. As can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>, the current state map identifies delays from several NVA components and the&#x2002;future state highlights ways of bundling activities (such as survey, mobilization, access-path preparation, and rock identification) to streamline the flow. The iterative process of coordination could&#x2002;help minimize avoidable delays under these findings. Consequently, the generated final schedule was enhanced&#x2002;for 2.06% and excavation duration as well as project delays decreased by 15% (234.88&#xa0;h) compared to original schedule.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>VSM diagram.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart compares present and future state processes for site clearing and earthwork excavation activities, showing steps such as debris removal, survey, equipment mobilization, rock identification, and muck removal, with future state consolidating steps and highlighting reduced waste.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Phase II: digital integration dashboard, power BI, and speckle</title>
<p>The use of digital tools to enhance Lean construction principles is the key focus of the integration. The Institutional building project leveraged a seamless digital workflow focused on model optimization, data visualization and automation by&#x2002;utilizing state-of-the-art digital tools like Autodesk Revit, Speckle, Microsoft Power BI and Power Automate.</p>
<sec id="s4-2-1">
<label>4.2.1</label>
<title>Revit modeling</title>
<p>Autodesk Revit platform was used as the primary digital modeling tool in this study. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>, a detailed 3D model of the institutional building located was developed with full parametric capabilities. To create a comprehensive digital model suitable for integration with Speckle, Power BI, and Power Automate, the model incorporated all major structural components, including columns, beams, footings, slabs, and the overall framing system.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>3D Revit model of the G&#x2b;7 Institutional structure.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three-dimensional architectural rendering showing a multistory building under construction, featuring visible concrete floors, support columns, beams, and an exposed skeletal structural framework. Perspective is angled slightly from above.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Other than the part of visualization, the 3D model was used for the precise quantity takeoff. Quantities of structural elements were recovered seamlessly from the digital work flow (floors, beams,&#x2002;columns, framed steel systems), and it was also possible to determine an amount of reinforcement that would have to be used for modernization or renovation; as well as the total quantity of concrete that should have been ordered for the complete pouring. Each element in the model was an independent object that had properties including geometrical dimensions, material composition, and load bearing capacity as well as construction sequence. Such a rich model provided a&#x2002;vast amount of metadata which enabled standardized reporting and monitoring, better support for data-based decision making during any phase of the project. The project modeling was guided with the strictest of adherence to codes and standards and a very high calibration process that allowed us to represent field conditions as closely as possible to reduce any appearance of design discrepancy or ease of buildability. Built on the back of this, the construction execution was further streamlined using Revit&#x2019;s clash detection features which enabled spatial clashes to be quickly identified and resolved. The model&#x2019;s ability to replicate time-based progressions through integration with scheduling and phasing features enabled the virtual construction sequence to replicate real-world implementation and facilitate efficient project tracking.</p>
<p>An additional set of Revit families were created to meet the unique design needs of this Institutional facility. Project-centric parameters were integrated into these custom components, facilitating easy linkage with sophisticated dashboards and workflow automation frameworks, seamless integration with data extraction processes, and enhanced visual representation clarity. In summary, the digital tools not only enhanced the model utility and reliability but also showed its necessity for guide-level automation, correctness and efficiency of the project accomplishment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2-2">
<label>4.2.2</label>
<title>Speckle integration</title>
<p>An open-source, AEC data-exchange platform called Speckle was used to stream real-time data from Autodesk Revit to the downstream applications. Speckle&#x2019;s Directory API and Revit Connectors were configured to automatically transfer model data (including geometry, element type, construction phase/sequence, material status and component relations) to a central Speckle server. The system streamed continuous data between Revit and the analytical platforms including Power Automate, Power BI and other supported application to automatically show the changes to the model as soon as they are made. It also facilitated decision-making, reporting of timely information and data-driven construction management.</p>
<p>Speckle transfers the design output from one tool into another for further analysis needed. It allows to store all previous model changes, references and, if required, forensically visit design differences or progression. Furthermore, Speckle enables multiple discipline teams such as architectural, structural and MEP to stream the discipline specific models into the single digital environment with federated models. It facilitates inter-discipline coordination and also helps to prevent, at an early stage of project design, clashes or even inconsistency. It ensures important information about a project can be accessed as and when needed, while supporting the collaboration process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2-3">
<label>4.2.3</label>
<title>Power BI dashboard development</title>
<p>An interactive dashboard for the&#x2002;project was created in Microsoft Power BI. Real-time interactive construction analytics were carried out based on the model data from Autodesk Revit that is continually synchronised via Speckle streams and visualised natively in the dashboard. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>, represent sample data from the dashboard showing the distribution of structural components and activity duration information through live visualization. The dashboard proved to be a seamless interface to navigate between construction progress, material reuse, quantities for demolition and structural components&#x2019;&#x2002;current position in the fabrication cycle. All the construction levels were able to be seen, while having appropriate filters like floors and structure elements (beams, columns or slabs) stages of construction. This&#x2002;provided on-the-fly visibility to construction taks like reinforcement needs/progress/status, inspections and concrete take-offs for each in-place location compared to project plan.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Power BI pie chart showing structural column distribution.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Pie chart illustrating the count of structural column schedules by type, with each segment representing a specific column configuration and its percentage. The largest segment, marked in light blue, accounts for 19 occurrences or 14.18 percent, followed by others such as 17 (12.69 percent), 16 (11.94 percent), and 12 (8.96 percent). A color-coded legend on the right lists column types by alphanumeric codes and volumes measured in cubic meters.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Activity duration visualization from the schedule analytics.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart displaying the count of duration for various construction activities, with Electrical Conduits, RCC columns, RFI Clearance, Slab Concrete, Slab Reinforcement, and Slab Shuttering each having the highest count of forty-five, while other activities show significantly lower counts on the horizontal axis labeled as Name.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Non-technical users as well as construction professionals alike could effortlessly interpret the project data through the visualizations including bar charts, heatmaps, and Key Performance Indicator (KPI) updates. One of the significant additions to this technology integration was the use of natural language processing (NLP) based chat option in the dashboard. For instance, users could ask:&#x2002;&#x201c;Show me all completed beams on Level 5&#x201d; and see the response directly. It consolidated Excel and Microsoft Project schedule data, in order to see and compare baseline plans versus real time progress at once. This made it easy to determine resource bottlenecks, critical path delays and slippage.</p>
<p>Continuous syncing with the live Speckle updates enabled the automatic capture of any changes to the Revit model, be it design changes, metadata or otherwise. This also helped in fast decision making by removing the manual refreshes that were required to update the project status. The system had row-level security protocols to ensure that the different stakeholders like project managers, site engineers and clients were able to access only the data relevant to them (i.e., it locked down firm data while enabling collaboration) so that the admininstrative and privacy standards were ensured.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2-4">
<label>4.2.4</label>
<title>Power automate service</title>
<p>The digital workflow for managing the project using Microsoft&#x2002;Power Automate tool resulted in reduced manual tracking and reporting. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref> below, Power Automate was able to read live metadata from the Revit&#x2013;Speckle environment and send automated email notifications, workflow actions, and condition-based alerts. This&#x2002;helped in achieving tighter communication loops, enhanced responsiveness and event-driven coordination between the project teams. Another important automation solution used was getting real-time update alerts of the construction progress in the BIM environment. The moment when an element was updated from &#x201c;In Progress&#x201d; to &#x201c;Completed&#x201d;, Power Automate would send a notification to the site engineer and quality control team to facilitate same-day inspections and clearance. Furthermore, predictive notifications were sent in case of any delay was being anticipated to any of the project tasks, based on the input data from progress updates and changes inflicted. This gave the project team the ability to take a preventive action to control delays, deploy extra resources and plan recovery actions with the aim of reducing schedule deviations.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Power automate workflow successfully triggering email alerts.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Power Automate flow summary for sending an email from Power BI, showing successful status, start and end times, client tracking ID, action tracking ID, and a diagram of completed flow steps.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Power automate flow details with timestamp and user trigger.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Screenshot of a Microsoft Power Automate flow interface showing a successful automation titled &#x22;Send an e-mail to any audience from Power BI.&#x22; The flow includes these steps: Compose 2, Send an email notification, Get my profile, and Apply to each, all marked completed. Inputs and outputs for Compose 2 are displayed with user information and a trigger timestamp.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Additionally, third party tools like SharePoint were used to collate the uploaded documents like BIM&#x2002;model inspector reports and Requests For Inspection (RFIs) in pre-designated project folders, in accordance with document control protocols. The project members were added to Microsoft Teams where queries could be posted in channels dedicated to site engineers and planners who required live updates. Through the integrated tools, the critical path was matched with the time-based resource demands, thus resulting in lesser risk&#x2002;of cascading delays. Overall, the integration of Power Automate made the project tracking and communication to become self-monitoring and digitally responsive.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results|discussion" id="s5">
<label>5</label>
<title>Results and discussion</title>
<p>Like many other projects, the selected institutional building construction also faced several chronic problems such as weather-related delays, supply chain and design unpredictability, and shifting labor availability, which had contributed to the production inefficiencies and overruns. To assess the current state of the project, it was decided to map the value streams for each of the main processes involved in the execution work. This was achieved with the aid of site diaries, resource logs and visual observation, and activities were classified as non-value adding work, non-value-adding or value-adding. These were communicated to the project team and efforts were taken to eliminate all the non-value adding activities based on the future state map. Once the project activities were streamlined, there was significant reduction of time observed. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref> shows the details of activities and their respective durations before and after lean implementation through VSM.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Time optimization using VSM.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Activity</th>
<th align="left">Total duration before applying lean principles (hr.)</th>
<th align="left">Total duration after applying lean principles (hr.)</th>
<th align="left">Percentage of reduction</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left">Substructure</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Excavation</td>
<td align="left">536</td>
<td align="left">455.6</td>
<td align="left">15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Foundation work</td>
<td align="left">432</td>
<td align="left">419.08</td>
<td align="left">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Column and retaining wall up to basement floor</td>
<td align="left">448</td>
<td align="left">448</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Basement floor level</td>
<td align="left">400</td>
<td align="left">400</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Basement roof slab</td>
<td align="left">440</td>
<td align="left">435.6</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left">Superstructure</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Ground floor roof slab</td>
<td align="left">408</td>
<td align="left">403.92</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">First floor roof slab</td>
<td align="left">352</td>
<td align="left">348.48</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Second floor roof slab</td>
<td align="left">352</td>
<td align="left">348.48</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Third floor roof slab</td>
<td align="left">352</td>
<td align="left">348.48</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fourth floor roof slab</td>
<td align="left">352</td>
<td align="left">348.48</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fifth floor roof slab</td>
<td align="left">352</td>
<td align="left">348.48</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Sixth floor roof slab</td>
<td align="left">352</td>
<td align="left">348.48</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Terrace floor roof slab</td>
<td align="left">352</td>
<td align="left">348.48</td>
<td align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Above terrace</td>
<td align="left">360</td>
<td align="left">360</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left">Architectural finishes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Basement floor</td>
<td align="left">480</td>
<td align="left">473.28</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Ground floor</td>
<td align="left">640</td>
<td align="left">631.04</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">First floor</td>
<td align="left">640</td>
<td align="left">631.04</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Third floor</td>
<td align="left">640</td>
<td align="left">631.04</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fourth floor</td>
<td align="left">640</td>
<td align="left">631.04</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Fifth floor</td>
<td align="left">640</td>
<td align="left">631.04</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Sixth floor</td>
<td align="left">640</td>
<td align="left">631.04</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Seventh floor</td>
<td align="left">640</td>
<td align="left">631.04</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">External works</td>
<td align="left">592</td>
<td align="left">552</td>
<td align="left">6.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Terrace waterproofing</td>
<td align="left">360</td>
<td align="left">360</td>
<td align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total duration</td>
<td align="left">11400</td>
<td align="left">11165.12</td>
<td align="left">&#x200b;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">% of saved time</td>
<td colspan="3" align="center">2.06%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Key performance indicators (KPIs) reported based on the actual execution of the Lean&#x2013;Digital. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref> summarizes those KPIs. An analysis&#x2002;was conducted at a live construction site in Vellore and observed for 4 months. The project time-schedule in MS Project and the effect of improvements were assessed by baselined versus real durations after Lean&#x2002;interventions. The categorization of activities VA, NVA, and NVAN was evaluated&#x2002;through confirmation by the project manager to confirm accuracy of workflow analysis. The implementation results indicate quantifiable&#x2002;enhancements, such as 15% in duration of excavation activity and 2.06% project time reduction. Furthermore, the project communication effectiveness was tracked by RFI response time which found that it&#x2002;was about two working days under the current system.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Summary of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) observed during implementation.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">KPI</th>
<th align="center">Observation/Result</th>
<th align="center">Evidence source</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Project location</td>
<td align="left">Vellore</td>
<td align="left">Site execution records</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Monitoring duration</td>
<td align="left">4&#xa0;months</td>
<td align="left">Site monitoring and observations</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Schedule planning tool</td>
<td align="left">MS project</td>
<td align="left">Baseline and revised schedules</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">VA/NVA/NVAN classification validation</td>
<td align="left">Verified with project manager</td>
<td align="left">Workflow review discussions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Excavation activity improvement</td>
<td align="left">15% reduction in duration</td>
<td align="left">VSM time comparison</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Overall project time improvement</td>
<td align="left">2.06% reduction in total duration</td>
<td align="left">Schedule comparison analysis</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RFI response time</td>
<td align="left">Approximately 2 working days</td>
<td align="left">Site communication tracking</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>In order to better&#x2002;continuous supervision and decision-making, these KPIs were also visually processed into this real-time visualization flow through data extraction from BIM model and dashboard intergration. The project model and its datasets were kept in synch using Speckle, ensuring updated&#x2002;project information flowed into a centralised reporting system. Power BI dashboards were subsequently created to monitor workflow status, progress and key performance indicators&#x2002;in an accessible manner. This included integrating the VSM with digital dashboards to ensure that lean improvements generated were not just observed but also measured dynamically,&#x2002;enabling the project team to more fully check in on progress quicker and address things like TSIs approvals and RFIs sooner.</p>
<p>Through the elimination of redundant handoffs and waits in the excavation stage, activity time was reduced from 536&#xa0;h to 455.6&#xa0;h - a reduction of 15%. With accelerated approval processes and efficienct sequencing, the project gained further efficiencies of 1.4%&#x2013;3% in the foundation and slab operations as well. In total, these changes decreased the length of project time by 234.88&#xa0;h (i.e., 2.06% shortening from 11400&#xa0;h down to 11156.12). The detailed breakdown of these improvements is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>. Delays in drawing approvals, needless motion, ineffective material transportation, and avoidable workflow stoppages were the main waste categories that were addressed during this study. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref> provides a comparison of overall project duration before and after applying lean principles.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>The Effect of Lean (VSM) on the construction activity duration of Institutional Building.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing project duration in hours before and after applying Lean principles, showing a reduction of 234.88 hours or two point zero six percent after implementation.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Further improvements were achieved by the adoption of digital technologies after VSM implementation. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9</xref>, a real-time feedback&#x2002;loop was introduced demonstrating progress, resource utilization and new workflow concerns via a live Power BI dashboard updated on the fly from Revit models (BIMs) through the Speckle platform. This data pipeline provided instantaneous, automatic information in place of time consuming manual updates. Closing feedback loops was another important function of Power Automate, which produced instant alerts of any schedule or model deviations, as seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref>, so that the execution and project management teams could react proactively as opposed to reactively. As the digital system evolved, the team members got more clarity in their daily responsibilities, reporting cycles and decision-making timelines shrank, and data input mistakes decreased.</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Power BI Dashboard with structural insights and schedule integration.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Institutional building dashboard interface showing a search bar, task suggestions, a Power Automate integration, and a 3D building model. Data visualizations include a bar chart for duration counts, a pie chart of structural column schedules, a pie chart of structural foundation schedules, and a bar chart of structural framing schedules sorted by different variables.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 10</label>
<caption>
<p>Automated Email generated via Power Automate and successfully received in the inbox.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g010.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Screenshot of a Gmail inbox showing an opened email from Microsoft Power Apps and Power Automate with the subject &#x201C;informed that it modified.&#x201D; The message notifies recipients about model variations reflected in Power BI and includes a link to unsubscribe.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The benefits of lean and technological integration in the project were only attained following a continuous investment in team training and a committed cultural shift toward data-driven management. Early challenges, such the transition to new sequences, matching real-world progress with model data, were similar to those encountered by many other construction projects which need continuous improvement and feedback. The limitations of process and technology are demonstrated by the fact that other external vulnerabilities, such as labor availability and climate impacts, can still control the project outcomes. By taking excavation as a sample activity, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref> shows an activity level vs. project level savings in duration where as, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12</xref> shows the improvement in other qualitative parameters like stakeholder response, and report/data turn around time) as well as the reduction in approval lags.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 11</label>
<caption>
<p>Impact of the lean&#x2013;digital framework on project duration.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g011.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing excavation activity duration and overall project duration in hours before and after Lean-Digital framework implementation. Both durations decrease post-implementation, with substantial reductions shown in post-implementation bars.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 12</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of actual improvements with industry benchmarks.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g012.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing actual improvement percentages to industry benchmarks for excavation activity duration and overall project duration. Excavation activity actual improvement is about fifteen percent, between the industry benchmark minimum of ten percent and maximum of forty percent. Overall project duration actual improvement is less than five percent, below the industry benchmark range of about one to fifteen percent.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Together with the usual benefits extracted from literature (construction uses&#x2002;of VSM often reducing between 10%&#x2013;30% the cycle time, associated to wait for approval flows, material flow or idle times (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Morato and Ferreira, 2024</xref>), The use of the lean tool VSM combined with digital technologies like BIM (Revit) BI (Power BI) and automated work (speckle), led to making a 15% reduction in duration on excavation tasks which were a vital contribution to obtain an overall saving time of 2.06% in project delivery esacpement standards. Instantaneous decision making is another important impact of the automatic alerts and live dashboards (on project control) also reflecting evidence based documentation on the productivity and time/cost visibility outcomes from BIM-BI where as much as 25% improvement attainment has been registered in real-time decision support, as well as acceleration&#x2002;process optimization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Mane and Mhaske, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gajera, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Di Giuda et al., 2024</xref>). International benchmarking also suggest that lean&#x2013;digital paradigms tend to global cut programs by 2%&#x2013;15% depending upon project size&#x2002;and digital maturity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Hammi et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Owais et al., 2024</xref>). Similarly, systematic waste identification and VSM-driven improvements have been found to achieve physical benefits in labour productivity gains (e.g., as much as a 12%&#x2002;increase in productivity and 18% reduction of idle time) using digital twin-enabled VSM case study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jiang et al., 2024</xref>). Nonetheless, literature also reports several practical barriers associated with the adoption of digitalized construction ecosystems, such as budget constraints, data security problems, regulatory obstacles, and lack of coordination between&#x2002;IT managers and operations team due to limited interoperability and workforce resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Rehman et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Otranto et al., 2025</xref>). Furthermore, numerous researches highlight that digitalization cannot completely mitigate external disturbances such as negative weather conditions or supply chain instability and resource constraints which&#x2002;still constitute major sources of variability for building projects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Liu et al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jiang et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>The key inferences from this study are, real-time data flows are key to a successful lean journey along with structured change management, continuous training and leadership support. Early quick wins can break the ice on resistance. Apart from continuing the longitudinal validation with different projects and increasing scalability and robustness, future developments might involve new technologies like IoT, Digital Twins, AI based analytics and so on.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<label>6</label>
<title>Theoretical and practical implications</title>
<p>The theoritical contribution of this study to lean construction research is that, it demonstrates how a lean tool combined with integrated digital tools (BIM, Power BI and Speckle) can achieve solid efficiency improvements.</p>
<sec id="s6-1">
<label>6.1</label>
<title>Proposed lean&#x2013;digital integration framework</title>
<p>Besides the actual time-saving realized, it was observed that qualitative improvements had been achieved by applying the proposed Lean&#x2013;Digital integration framework in terms of improved communications with stakeholders, greater transparency, expedited approval cycles and more efficient coordination among project teams. We summarize the overall quantitative effects of the framework in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F13" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 13</label>
<caption>
<p>Lean-digital framework impact on qualitative metrics.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g013.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing pre-implementation and post-implementation scores for stakeholder response time, data/reporting cycle, and approval lag. All metrics show significant improvement, with lower post-implementation bars indicating better performance.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The study proposes a practical Lean&#x2013;Digital integration framework for planning and site level execution which is represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F14">Figure 14</xref>. The framework is proposed to enhance the construction productivity using process optimisation&#x2002;and real-time monitoring. This framework is divided into two main stages: (i) Planning Phase (Pre-construction) and (ii) Implementation&#x2002;Phase (Site implementation). Inputs to the project are gathered and a Value&#x2002;Stream Map (VSM) is created for the current state based on this definition into VA, NVA, and NVAN categories. Bottlenecks are&#x2002;identified, and a future state VSM is created to improve the process. Streamline data synchronization and monitoring with BIM development and digital system configuration in Speckle,&#x2002;Power BI, and Power Automate. In the execution phase,&#x2002;the modified lean plan is executed in a field office or site and updated with progress data and RFI information at regular intervals while real-time KPIs are monitored using dashboards. Automated notifications facilitate the timely decision making, followed by control actions and the improvement loop for&#x2002;eternal refinements of project strategy.</p>
<fig id="F14" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 14</label>
<caption>
<p>Practical lean&#x2013;digital integration framework for planning and site execution.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbuil-12-1761692-g014.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart illustrating a construction project workflow divided into two phases: planning period with six steps including project inputs, current state VSM, root cause analysis, future state VSM, BIM development, and digital setup; and execution period with six steps covering execution, progress data, real-time monitoring, automated alerts, control actions, and improvement loop, linked by a digital handover into site.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The recommended lean-digital integration framework provides practitioners an empirical roadmap for transforming the integrated project delivery. The creation of real-time digital dashboards could reduce the cycles of manual reporting greatly, allowing teams to make faster decisions. Adopting open data exchange platforms like Speckle can improve coordination by easing the integration of multi-disciplinary stakeholders. The study provides a roadmap for clear change management, to achieve early &#x201c;quick wins&#x201d;, which is designed and backed by leadership, and sharp training to deal&#x2002;with resistance in this phase.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s7">
<label>7</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The results of this research showed that digital technologies like BIM, BI and automated data exchange can be seamlessly integrated with lean practices and bring considerable improvement in project delivery time of construction. VSM allowed for time savings,&#x2002;in a selected excavation activity around 15% which accounted for about 2.06% reduction in overall project time.</p>
<p>Through real time digital connectivity, everyone in the value chain from site managers and engineers&#x2013;could&#x2002;see the progress at a glance, get instantaneous updates on model changes or hazards to schedule and act on issues far quicker than with traditional reporting. In addition to the ability for faster review and feedback, accessible&#x2002;data also helps teams collaborate more effectively, hold each other accountable more efficiently and enables faster decision making. With constant visibility and automatic notifications, perceived benefits like better role clarity and ownership can be gained.&#x2002;The case also demonstrated the significance of feedback hardwire support and customization.</p>
<p>The results of this study can be viewed in the context that a scaleable lean-digital integration may not only increase the performance of individual projects, but also could help in creating a consistent&#x2002;pattern in the construction industry.</p>
<p>All of these need to be&#x2002;further underpinned and developed through greater investment in digital infrastructure, training team members and creating an iterative approach towards process improvements. The benefits for practice will help to support the wider industry move towards complete lean and digital adoption resulting in more&#x2002;efficient, transparent projects that are competitive globally over the long term.</p>
<sec id="s7-1">
<label>7.1</label>
<title>Limitations and recommendations</title>
<p>The study considered only a selected activity for analysing the impact of lean integration with digital technology and extrapolated it to the project level outcomes. Moreover the study did not consider the detailed impact of other types of lean wastes and micro-level productivity details. The solutions recommended are based on empirical data from an example project site whereas the conditions and processes can vary in other projects. The cost-benefit analysis of adapting the technologies was not considered as well, which can be explored in future studies.</p>
<p>The emergence of other Industry 4.0 technologies like Internet of Things (IoT), Digital Twins, Automated Robots, and Artificial Intelligence is having a significant impact in the construction industry. The exact impact and benefits of such technologies and their synergy with lean needs a thorough research investigation. It is also needed to establish industry standards and best practices which will drive the ongoing progress across the entire building sector.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s8">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="s9">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>KM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. DT: Investigation, Data curation, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. AV: Formal Analysis, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. PR: Supervision, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review and editing. BA: Validation, Writing &#x2013; review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s11">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ai-statement" id="s12">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s13">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdelghany</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shokri</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Using BIM as a lean management tool in construction processes &#x2013; a case study</article-title>. <source>HBRC J.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/16874048.2021.1963032</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abedini</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nik-Bakht</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asnafi</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghafari</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Lean practices using building information modeling (BIM) and digital twinning for sustainable construction</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>161</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su13010161</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aliakbar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ardeshir</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmad</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>From building information modeling to construction digital twin: a conceptual framework</article-title>. <source>J. Inf. Technol. Constr.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>512</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>530</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/21693277.2024.2387679</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Batwara</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Makkar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giallanza</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Towards smart sustainable development through value stream mapping: a systematic literature review with bibliometric analysis</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>e15852</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15852</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37215771</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Di Giuda</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meschini</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gasbarri</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Accardo</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tagliabue</surname>
<given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cacciaguerra</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>BIM, GIS and BI tools for a university asset management system supporting space management, occupancy evaluation and optimization strategies</article-title>. <source>J. Inf. Technol. Constr.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1128</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1155</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36680/j.itcon.2024.050</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gajera</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Integrating power BI with project control systems: enhancing real-time cost tracking and visualization in construction</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Sci. Res. Civ. Eng.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32628/IJSRCE123761</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gunduz</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naser</surname>
<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Cost based value stream mapping as a sustainable construction tool for underground pipeline construction projects</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2184</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su9122184</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hammi</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Messaoudi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Loukil</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Lean-BIM approach for improving the performance of a construction project in the design phase</article-title>. <source>Buildings</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>654</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/buildings13030654</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname>
<given-names>R. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skibniewski</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Digital twin-enabled synchronized construction management: a roadmap from construction 4.0 towards future prospect</article-title>. <source>Dev. Built Environ.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>100512</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100512</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Towards digital-twin-enabled facility management: the natural language processing model for managing facilities in buildings</article-title>. <source>J. Inf. Technol. Constr.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>251</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17508975.2024.2370372</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Antwi-Afari</surname>
<given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manu</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>BIM, IoT, and GIS integration in construction resource monitoring</article-title>. <source>Automation Constr.</source> <volume>174</volume>, <fpage>106149</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106149</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mane</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mhaske</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>BIM-Based planning for time and cost optimization with power BI</article-title>. <source>Smart Eng. J.</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.70729/SE24616165414</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Michaud</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forgues</surname>
<given-names>E. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carignan</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forgues</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouellet-Plamondon</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A lean approach to optimize BIM information flow using value stream mapping</article-title>. <source>A Lean Approach Optimize BIM Information Flow Using Value Stream Mapping. J. Inf. Technol. Constr.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>472</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>488</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36680/j.itcon.2019.025</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morato</surname>
<given-names>M. L. D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferreira</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Value stream mapping application for construction industry loss and waste reduction: a systematic literature review</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>International Journal of Lean Six Sigma</source> (<publisher-loc>Bingley, United Kingdom</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher-name>), <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>817</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>837</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/ijlss-06-2023-0100</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Newhouse</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souppaya</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cooper</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Polk</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barker</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scarfone</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Addressing visibility challenges with TLS 1.3 within the enterprise: high-Level document</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source>NIST Special Publication</source>. <publisher-loc>Gaithersburg, MD</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)</publisher-name>, <fpage>1800</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1837</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.6028/NIST.SP.180037</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Otranto</surname>
<given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Junior</surname>
<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pellanda</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>BIM&#x2013;FM integration through openBIM: solutions for interoperability towards efficient operations</article-title>. <source>J. Inf. Technol. Constr.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>298</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>318</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36680/j.itcon.2025.012</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Owais</surname>
<given-names>O. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poshdar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bidhendi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaafar</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarhan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>From concept to concrete: Digital twins enabling different levels of lean construction</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Proceedings of the 32<sup>nd</sup> annual conference of the international group for lean construction (IGLC 32)</source>, <fpage>767</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>779</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24928/2024/0206</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Patel</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mistry</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A process improvement methodology for effective implementation of value stream mapping integrated with foreman delay survey</article-title>. <source>Innov. Infrastruct. Solutions</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>137</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s41062-021-00512-1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramalingam</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Mapping of BIM process for teaching lean</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Proceedings of the 26<sup>th</sup> annual conference of the international group for lean construction</source>, <fpage>1291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1301</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24928/2018/0258</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramani</surname>
<given-names>P. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lingan</surname>
<given-names>L. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Developing a lean model to reduce the design process cost of gas insulated switchgear foundation using value stream mapping &#x2013; a case study</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Constr. Manag.</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>669</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>677</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15623599.2019.1644756</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rehman</surname>
<given-names>S. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hwang</surname>
<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Advancing BIM and game engine integration in the AEC industry: innovations, challenges, and future directions</article-title>. <source>J. Comput. Des. Eng.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jcde/qwaf030</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roxo</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gouveia</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leit&#xe3;o</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Construction management supported by BIM and a business intelligence tool</article-title>. <source>Energies</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>3412</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/en15093412</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zekhnini</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>El Kadiri</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benabbou</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chehab</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>An integrated BIM-power BI approach for data extraction and visualization</article-title>. <source>Int. Archives Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.</source>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W4-2022-67-2022</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1277457/overview">Yusuf Arayici</ext-link>, Northumbria University, United Kingdom</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3101480/overview">Abdullah Badawy Mohammed</ext-link>, Fayoum University, Egypt</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3343353/overview">Misaela M&#xe1;rquez</ext-link>, National Polytechnic Institute (IPN), Mexico</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>