Antidiabetic pharmacotherapy has evolved significantly in recent decades, offering a wide range of therapeutic options. The selection of the ideal drug depends on several factors, including the drug’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, individual tolerability, and the presence of comorbidities (ElSayed et al., 2025b; Mudaliar, 2023).

The pharmacological therapy for type 1 diabetes is based only on insulin administration, which is essential for glycemic control. Additionally, pramlintide is introduced as a pharmacological adjuvant, serving as a complementary therapy to insulin that helps improve postprandial glycemic control by reducing significant fluctuations in glucose levels after meals (ElSayed et al., 2025b).

Currently, there are several types of insulin available for managing type 1 diabetes, including different categories tailored to patients’ needs. The main differences between the various types of insulin lie in their onset, peak, and duration of action. Ultra-rapid-acting insulins (lispro, aspart, and glulisine) have an onset of action approximately 15 min after administration, peak at 1 h, and remain active for 2–4 h, making them ideal for immediate postprandial control. Long-acting insulins (glargine and detemir) provide stable glycemic control for up to 24 h, whereas ultra-long-acting insulins, such as degludec, last for more than 24 h, allowing greater flexibility in administration and reduced glycemic fluctuations. Intermediate-acting insulins, such as NPH, act within 2–4 h, peak between 4 and 12 h, and have a duration of 12–18 h, often being used in mixed regimens. Short-acting insulins (regular) have an onset of action at 30 min, peak between 2 and 3 h, and last for 3–6 h, being utilized in specific glycemic control contexts. Finally, inhaled insulins, such as Afrezza, offer a rapid-acting option administered via inhalation, particularly indicated for postprandial glycemic control in selected patients (ElSayed et al., 2025b).

One of the greatest developments and transformations in type 1 diabetes care is the advancement of technologies such as Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII), Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM), and Automated Insulin Delivery (AID). CSII uses insulin pumps to deliver continuous doses and bolus insulin, ensuring more precise control of the patient’s needs. CGM monitors glucose levels in real time, allowing for quick adjustments and early detection of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. Finally, AID systems, which combine insulin pumps and CGM, automatically adjust insulin doses based on glucose readings, providing more efficient glucose control and reducing the need for manual intervention. These advanced technologies significantly improve patients’ quality of life by optimizing glucose control and reducing the risk of complications associated with type 1 diabetes (Marfil-Garza et al., 2021; Larsen, 2004).

Although technologies like CSII, CGM, and AID offer significant benefits in managing type 1 diabetes, they also present some risks and disadvantages. The high cost of these devices and the lack of access in some healthcare systems can be barriers for patients. Technical failures, such as issues with calibration or communication between devices, can affect treatment effectiveness. Additionally, sensor inaccuracies may delay the detection of glucose fluctuations, increasing the risk of hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. The complexity of use and potential for human error in device management may also lead to complications, requiring continuous monitoring and proper training to minimize risks. Because of that education on insulin dose adjustment based on carbohydrate intake, physical activity, and glycemic trends is considered crucial. Glucagon is typically prescribed for those at high risk of hypoglycemia, and treatment plans should be regularly reviewed and adjusted (Atkinson et al., 2015; ElSayed et al., 2025b; Diabetes Technology et al., 2025).

In the management of type 2 diabetes, a patient-centered approach is highly emphasized, considering individualized glycemic, weight goals and the possibility of hypoglycemia. Associated comorbidities, especially cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease should also be part of the equation. Lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy are therefore both important. There are various therapeutic drug classes available, including metformin, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 receptor agonists, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and insulin human and analogues (ElSayed et al., 2025b).

The therapeutic plan should be regularly reviewed and adjusted every 3–6 months. Insulin therapy is effective for severe hyperglycemia and can be used in combination with other antidiabetic therapeutic classes (ElSayed et al., 2025a; ElSayed et al., 2025b).

Pancreas transplantation and pancreatic islet transplantation represent innovative approaches in the treatment of type 1 diabetes, with the potential to significantly transform patients’ quality of life. These interventions aim to restore natural insulin production and glycemic regulation, providing alternatives to continuous exogenous insulin use (Marfil-Garza et al., 2021; Larsen, 2004).

Pancreas transplantation is a complex surgical procedure used specially for type 1 diabetes treatment. This procedure involves surgical implantation of a healthy donor pancreas, allowing for the resumption of normal insulin secretion and glucose regulation, and eliminating the need to administrate exogenous insulin (Gruessner and Gruessner, 2013; Rickels, 2012). Pancreas transplants are more often performed together with kidneys, known as simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants. With the best 1-year pancreas graft survival rate, SPK is recommended for DM1 patients and/or with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (Larsen, 2004; van der Boog et al., 2004; Gupta and Sharma, 2012; Larsen et al., 2002). Pancreas transplantation alone (PTA) or pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK) are alternative approaches for patients without ESRD or for those who have previously received a kidney transplant (Larsen, 2004; Larson et al., 2004). Despite high 1-year post-transplant patient survival (>95%) and graft (almost 85%) rates, lifelong immunosuppressive therapy is mandatory to prevent graft rejection, with typical regimens including tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids (Larsen, 2004; Kalluri, 2012). Despite a relatively high success rate, complications such as graft thrombosis, infection, and both acute and chronic rejection remain significant challenges (Humar et al., 2003). Successful pancreas transplantation can lead to insulin independence, improved glycemic control, and reduced long-term diabetic complications, enhancing the patient’s quality of life. However, the procedure requires rigorous candidate selection and ongoing postoperative care to ensure long-term graft function and patient survival (Larsen, 2004).

Langerhans islets are clusters of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. When isolated from donor pancreases and infused into the patient’s liver via the portal vein, they can function as replacement cells to potentially restore normoglycemia. Clinical islet transplantation is an emerging and effective therapy for type 1 diabetic patients who suffer from severe hypoglycemia and glucose instability despite insulin therapy (Marfil-Garza et al., 2021; Cayabyab et al., 2021). Recent studies underscore the importance of islets in glucose homeostasis and their potential to improve outcomes in diabetes treatment (Marfil-Garza et al., 2021; Félix-Martínez et al., 2024; Briggs et al., 2022). Studies indicate that for patients with type 1 diabetes or pancreatogenic diabetes, islet transplantation can stabilize glycemic instability, improve quality of life, and reduce insulin dependence (Rodriguez et al., 2020; Moon et al., 2024), (Langlois et al., 2024). Furthermore, auto islet transplantation after pancreatectomy helps prevent postsurgical diabetes (Arce et al., 2016). The studies also suggest that using islets from a single well major histocompatibility complex (MHC) matched donor may improve graft survival. However, challenges remain, especially in isolating large quantities of islets, with collagenase digestion being a critical limiting factor that needs further research (London, 1995). Although clinical islet transplantation holds promise, its application remains limited to specific patient groups due to its complexity, cost, and the need for donor pancreases. Additionally, the need for long-term immunosuppressant drugs to prevent the body from rejecting the transplanted islets puts patients at a higher risk of infections and other complications. The surgical procedure itself carries risks like bleeding, infection, and pancreatitis. Finally, the limited lifespan of the transplanted islets and the possibility of graft failure require additional treatments and can impact a patient’s quality of life (London, 1995). Despite considerable advancements, pancreas transplantation and islet transplantation remain challenging due to surgical complications, the need for prolonged immunosuppression, and limitations in donor availability. In this sense, new approaches offer potential future advances in diabetes treatment, including the development of new cell therapies, namely, using stem cell-derived sources, cells obtained from reprogramming (Wang et al., 2022; Domínguez-Bendala and Ricordi, 2012), or their combination with different biomaterials or extracellular matrices to recreate some of the pancreatic tissue functionality (Hering et al., 2006; Kroon et al., 2008a; Rezania et al., 2012; Rickels and Robertson, 2019).

Trans-differentiation involves the re-programming of a differentiated cell lineage into another differentiated cell lineage without the need to pass from a stemness stage. This is possible because the differentiated cells retain the capacity of switching some genes to others resulting in the change of the cells’ phenotype. In case of pancreas, trans-differentiation of liver, stomach and small intestine cells has been established sharing the same lineage origin of pancreatic cells (Okere et al., 2016; Nair et al., 2020).

In vertebrates, liver and pancreatic cells originate from a shared pool of progenitor stem cells located in the extra-hepatic biliary tree. These cells differentiate into hepatic and pancreatic tissues in response to chemical signals released by the developing heart (Meivar-Levy and Ferber, 2019). Thus, several groups have successfully trans-differentiated hepatic cells into insulin-producing cells (Meivar-Levy and Ferber, 2019; Ferber et al., 2000). The first approach involved the recombinant adenovirus-mediated gene transfer to insert pancreatic and duodenal homeobox-1(PDX1) in mice liver, which is a master regulator of pancreas organogenesis and activate insulin production (Ferber et al., 2000). In the meantime, liver to pancreas trans-differentiation evolved being investigated in vitro in rodent, pig human-derived hepatic cells, and primary human liver cultures (Meivar-Levy and Ferber, 2019). Despite the interesting outcomes of these approaches, several limitations came up including the need of using adenovirus for gene transfer or the achievement of hybrid hepatocyte-beta cells phenotypes during culture of these cells which limited the balance between insulin production and glucose levels.

The intestinal and antral stomach are rich in endocrine cells similar to pancreatic beta cells (Ariyachet et al., 2006). Spadoni et al. (Spadoni et al., 2017) indicated that it is possible to reprogramming insulin-producing cells in the small intestine of patients with type 1 diabetes with no evidence of immune rejection. Ariyachet et al. (Ariyachet et al., 2006) also showed that the expression of β-cell reprogramming factors in a diabetic mouse model in vivo effectively converted antral stomach cells into insulin-producing cells with significant molecular and functional similarities to β-cells.

Recently, researchers have focused on alpha cells as a potential source for replacing beta cells in trans-differentiation approaches for diabetes treatment (Saleh et al., 2021). Alpha-cells (glucagon producers) and beta cells (insulin producers) share a common precursor lineage which have shown to simplify reprogramming efforts for insulin-producing cells development. Furuyama et al. (Furuyama et al., 2019) showed that reprogramming alpha-cells with MAFA and PDX1 genes induced these cells to produce insulin while retaining alpha-cells features. Conversely, the deletion of PDX1 in adult mice beta cells resulted in increased alpha-cells and altered islets morphology, suggesting inherent plasticity among alpha- and beta cells. The fact that both cells possess functional similarities in terms of glucose transporters and hormone secretion, as well as anatomic proximity, sharing islet location, blood supply and innervation, may enhance the trans-differentiation process with a minimum impact on cells metabolism. In fact, alpha-cells to beta cells trans-differentiation were reported as naturally occurring in both healthy and diabetic human and mouse pancreatic islets, which holds great potential as a pathway to regenerate beta cells in diabetic patients (Saleh et al., 2021).

Over the years, regenerative medicinal approaches for type 1 diabetes have been actively exploiting adult stem cell-based therapies envisioning the repopulation of the injured pancreatic islets.

Adult mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), mostly derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue and dental pulp, have good self-renewal and multi-differentiation capacity and possess the ability to secrete immunomodulatory and trophic mediators (Caplan, 2015; Maqsood et al., 2020), rendering them a great potential for cell-based therapies in regenerative medicine. One of the most promising strategies using adult MSCs as a source for pancreatic islets consists in the generation of adult stem cell-derived insulin-secreting beta cells that can be transplanted into patients preventing autoimmune process and restoring beta cell function (Luo et al., 2024). MSCs are prone to be differentiated in vitro, using inductors namely nicotinamide, BMP7 and exendin4, and become insulin productive cells that, when transplanted in vivo, are able to improve glucose tolerance and reduce hyperglycemia (Singh et al., 2023). Additionally, other pre-clinical study conducted with a distinct approach to guide differentiation using agents as activin A, BMP4, nicotinic acid and GSK3b inhibitor, were able to create insulin-producing cells expressing beta cell markers, including insulin, PDX1, and NKX6.1. The resulting IPCs exhibited glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, suggesting functional beta cell activity (Thakur et al., 2020). Besides some challenges regarding the differentiation protocols that vary depending on the cell source and culture conditions, the scientific community is reaching good outcomes with MSC-derived cells, exhibiting a morphological and molecular resemble of the native pancreatic beta cells. However, they are less functional than the native pancreatic beta cells, producing lower levels of insulin and reduced expression of maturation factors, such as MAFA and SIX3 (Nair et al., 2019; Veres et al., 2019a; Karimova et al., 2022).

Nonetheless, interesting findings also arise from adult pancreatic stem cells which are found both inside the islets and in the epithelium of pancreatic ducts (Ramiya et al., 2000; Abraham et al., 2002; Ramiya et al., 2000; Zulewski et al., 2001).

Preclinical studies reveal the existence of a population of cells within islets that express a stem cell-specific marker, nestin, and can differentiate into either a ductal or an endocrine pancreatic phenotype, with a huge capacity for proliferation in vitro. These islet-derived progenitor cells are a distinct population of cells that reside within islets and could be used in the neogenesis of islet endocrine cells (Zulewski et al., 2001; Ji et al., 2022).

Additionally, Ramiya and collaborators successfully generate functional insulin-producing cells by the differentiation of pancreatic stem cells extracted from the ducts, using animal models (Ramiya et al., 2000). Later on, another study focused on the isolation and characterization of pancreas-derived multipotent progenitor cells, found at low frequency (nearly 0.025%) from both islet and ductal isolates derived from adult mouse pancreas. Upon differentiation, the colonies produce distinct populations of pancreatic cells, among them β-like cells with glucose-dependent responsiveness and insulin secretion, constituting a promising candidate for diabetic therapeutic avenues (Seaberg et al., 2004).

Adult stem and progenitor cell-based therapies have made remarkable progress reversing insulin-dependent diabetes after transplantation. However, many challenges remain, being imperative to optimize cell differentiation protocols, other sources of stem cells, explore new strategies to improve cell survival and functionality and to generate cells that meet the quality and safety to be applied in clinical trials.

The use of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) in cell therapies is revolutionizing diabetes treatment. Both embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) share the ability to differentiate into the three embryonic germ layers, including insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells (Pagliuca et al., 2014; Kroon et al., 2008b). Moreover, hPSCs possess unlimited proliferation capability in vitro, raising hopes for high-scalable cell therapies (Kropp et al., 2016). The challenges lie in the step-by-step control of the differentiation pathway to ensure production of pure and functional hPSC-derived beta cells, which can be grafted in vivo without triggering immune rejection or teratoma formation (Faleo et al., 2017).

Significant advances in beta cell differentiation protocols have improved the efficiency and functionality of hPSC-derived beta cells while reducing teratoma risk (Pagliuca et al., 2014; Kroon et al., 2008b; D’Amour et al., 2006; Rezania et al., 2014; Veres et al., 2019b; Yoshihara et al., 2020). These protocols generally involve the time-controlled regulation of specific signalling pathways to mimic the embryonic development of the pancreas (Jin and Jiang, 2022). Recent procedures have produced insulin-producing beta cells with proven in vivo efficacy, inhibiting a glucose challenge in 73% of immunodeficient mice 2 weeks after transplantation (Pagliuca et al., 2014). Insulin levels in the bloodstream were maintained 18 weeks after transplantation.

To prevent in vivo immune rejection of the graft, hPSC-based therapies can be combined with systemic immunosuppression, though carrying significant side effects (Petrus-Reurer et al., 2021). Alternative approaches have focused on IFNγ-stimulation of PD-L1 expression, a key determinant of immune tolerance in beta cells, or the encapsulation of the hPSC-derived beta cells using materials such as hydrogels (Yoshihara et al., 2020; Henry et al., 2018; Ma et al., 2016). To date, hESC-derived beta cells launched phase 1/2 clinical trials in three studies (ClinicalTrials.gov). Viacyte’s two trials, started in 2014 and 2017, involved encapsulated hESC-derived pancreatic endoderm (NCT02239354, NCT03163511) (Shapiro et al., 2021; Ramzy et al., 2021; Henry et al., 2018). The trials yielded promising results in terms of safety and efficacy, even though insulin production was insufficient for full insulin independence (Shapiro et al., 2021). Vertex’s trial, initiated in 2021, uses hESC-derived islet cells (NCT04786262).

Although promising, the ethical concerns surrounding the embryonic origin of ESCs limit their widespread utilization (Robertson, 2010). A more ethical alternative resides in iPSC, as they are obtained by reprogramming adult somatic cells and do not involve the destruction of embryos (Takahashi et al., 2007). Additionally, the use of iPSCs in research and clinic is more straightforward than with hESCs (Daley et al., 2016). Finally, generating iPSC from the patient could reduce the risk of immune rejection and enable personalized therapies.

The maturation and development of functional beta cells, essential for insulin production and glucose regulation, is a complex multi-stage process. It begins in the embryonic pancreas, where progenitor cells differentiate into beta cells under transcription factors like PDX1 and NGN3 (Timmons and Boyle, 2022). During fetal development, beta cells start expressing insulin at non-functional levels. In the neonatal period (infants <1 year), they undergo significant changes, enabling insulin secretion at low glucose concentrations and establishing glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) (Nair et al., 2020; Barsby and Otonkoski, 2022). In contrast, juvenile beta cells (ages 1–9) behave more like adult beta cells in GSIS but release less insulin, influenced by diet and hormonal changes. They also respond to secretagogues, e.g., sulfonylureas and meglitinides, that stimulate insulin production by the cells and thereby indicating their maturation stage by 1 year after birth (Timmons and Boyle, 2022; Matthews and Wallace, 2005). Nevertheless, there are some key factors that distinguish juvenile beta cells from adult beta cells. They have higher expression of the MAFB marker, which regulates glucose sensing and insulin secretion (Artner et al., 2010). In contrast, most adult beta cells show low levels of proliferative markers and high expression of transcription factors like SIX2 and SIX3, crucial for insulin secretion (Tremmel et al., 2023). Additionally, adult beta cells contain lipid droplets essential for normal insulin secretion, which are absent in juvenile beta-cells. As a result, adult beta cells are considered fully differentiated and the first to glucose stimulation and insulin secretion.

Despite their differentiation degree, adult beta cells exhibit diverse subtypes with functional heterogeneity and plasticity, enabling them to adapt to various physiological needs and metabolic stresses (Rutter et al., 2024). “Hub” cells serve as coordinators within the islet, synchronizing the activity of other beta cell subtypes for stable insulin secretion (Satin et al., 2020). FLTP− beta cells possess high proliferative capacity, essential for regeneration during metabolic changes like pregnancy or obesity. Stress-resistant beta cells are vital for maintaining function under metabolic and immune stress, such as in diabetes (Satin et al., 2020; Benninger and Kravets, 2022). Leader beta cells use distinct calcium signalling pathways to guide other subtypes during insulin secretion, adjusting their response based on the islet’s physiological state (Avrahami et al., 2017).

The functional heterogeneity among the adult beta cells subtypes is crucial for maintaining islet functionality during metabolic stresses and disease states. However, the underlying mechanisms that control interconversion among adult beta cells subtypes remain unclear, hindering the development of effective methods for generating functional beta cells from progenitor stem cells for cell-based therapies (Liu and Hebrok, 2017).

Two main approaches to beta cell therapies have been developed, namely macro-scale and micro-scale delivery systems (Skyler and Ricordi, 2011; Toftdal et al., 2024). Although the concept of “nanoencapsulation” has been proposed to define the individual encapsulation of cells, we find it less suitable, as cells inherently exist at the micro scale. Therefore, we consider microencapsulation as the individual encapsulation of cells or their encapsulation within a matrix. Following this rational, we focus only on macro and micro-scale encapsulation approaches.

Macro-scale devices are beneficial because they can be removed if safety issues arise. However, their small surface area limits the diffusion of essential molecules like oxygen and insulin, which reduces therapy effectiveness (Abadpour et al., 2021a; Toftdal et al., 2024). Macroencapsulation devices (MEDs) provide a promising treatment for type 1 diabetes by protecting insulin-secreting pancreatic beta cells from the immune system. However, traditional MEDs have low cell capacity and poor nutrient delivery, leading to cell death and decreased insulin output. Convection-enhanced MEDs (ceMEDs) improve nutrient flow and cell survival. Devices like Encaptra, βAir Bio, and the Artificial Pancreas are in trials but still struggle with nutrient transport. Ongoing research aims to improve their long-term effectiveness for diabetes management (Yang et al., 2021).

Micro-scale devices offer a significantly larger surface area compared to macro-scale, enhancing mass transfer and oxygenation for the encapsulated cells. However, these devices are challenging to retrieve and tend to disperse uncontrollably within the body (Abadpour et al., 2021a; Toftdal et al., 2024). M. Hamid et al. compared insulin release from microencapsulated BRIN-BD11 insulin-secreting beta cells to non-encapsulated cells. They found that while encapsulated cells released approximately 60% of the insulin produced by non-encapsulated cells, the functional responses to different stimuli such as glucose and amino acids were comparable, indicating preserved cell functionality. Microencapsulation also protects transplanted cells from immune destruction, suggesting it is a promising approach to improve diabetes treatment by preserving pancreatic beta cell function (Hamid et al., 2001).

Macro and micro-approaches have shown promise, with future perspectives focusing on creating hybrid devices that combine the immune protection of macro-devices with the nutrient exchange efficiency of micro-devices, incorporating biocompatible materials and promoting vascularization to improve graft viability and function in clinical applications (Abadpour et al., 2021b).

To increase cell therapies’ efficacy, it is necessary to have viable platforms for facilitating cell growing, transporting and implantation, avoiding cell migration from the targeted site. This has been fostering many advancements in the biomaterial field to find solutions that can mimic pancreatic tissue environment.

Several synthetic and natural-based biomaterials have been playing an essential role for beta cells encapsulation, ensuring their long-term viability and acting as an immunoshield against the natural body environment (Table 1) (Toftdal et al., 2024; Kaur et al., 2017).

Synthetic-based biomaterials are versatile and offer a tailored control over physicochemical properties of cell-encapsulating materials in terms of porosity, flexibility and stability. Moreover, the inert properties and high reproducibility of synthetic-based biomaterials allows for more efficient cell/islet-encapsulation performances with reduced risks of immune response after encapsulation (Toftdal et al., 2024). PEG hydrogels, known for their immunoprotected properties, create a protective barrier around islets, shielding them from the immune system and promoting long-term survival (Davis et al., 2012; Smink et al., 2018; An et al., 2018). Polycaprolactone (PCL) is widely used in clinical settings due to its favourable degradation rate and biocompatibility. It has also been employed as a scaffold for beta cell transplantation, showing excellent islet survival (Smink et al., 2023; Stock et al., 2024). Finally, poly (L-lactic-co-caprolactone) (PLCL), a co-polymer of PCL and polylactic acid (PLA), offers adjustable degradation and mechanical properties based on the PCL-to-PLA ratio. PLCL is also biocompatible, cost-effective, and holds significant potential for soft tissue engineering (Toftdal et al., 2024). To conclude, these materials have the potential to address the challenges associated especially with islet transplantation, such as immune rejection and graft failure, and improve clinical outcomes for patients with type 1 diabetes (Smink et al., 2018).

Natural-based biomaterials have emerged as promising candidates due to their inherent biocompatibility and ability to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the pancreas (Toftdal et al., 2024). Alginate, a polysaccharide derived from seaweed, is widely used due to its quick gelation properties, low cytotoxicity, and ability to encapsulate cells effectively (An et al., 2018). Hyaluronic acid (HA), a component of the pancreatic ECM, is another natural material known for its positive influence on cell adhesion, survival, and proliferation (Toftdal et al., 2021; Cañibano-Hernández et al., 2019). Collagen, a major structural protein in various tissues, is also used due to its exceptional biocompatibility and ability to be cross-linked in various ways (Stephens et al., 2020). Silk fibroin is also a promising material for cell therapy, supporting cell growth and differentiation while maintaining its structural integrity and biocompatibility over time (Davis et al., 2012).

3D in vitro models are gaining significance in diabetes and cell therapy research. Unlike traditional 2D cultures, these models provide a more accurate representation of the physiological environment, enabling more effective simulation of human body conditions (Li et al., 2020).

In vitro 3D models for diabetes, such as organoids and spheroids, more accurately mimic the structure and microenvironment of pancreatic islets, resulting in better functionality and insulin production by beta cells. These models are valuable for replicating healthy and diabetic states, providing important insights into the progression of diabetes and the effects of potential treatments. Additionally, they have great potential for use in large-scale drug testing, allowing for the evaluation of their efficacy and safety in a more relevant biological context (Mohandas et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2022). Companies like Readily3D (Printing Industry, 2025) and Aspect Biosystems (Printing Industry, 2025) are at the forefront of this research, developing bioprinted models for diabetes drug testing, which helps in creating more accurate and relevant testing platforms.

Advances in tissue engineering have enabled the development of 3D scaffolds that support the growth and differentiation of stem cells into insulin-producing cells, offering promises for cell replacement therapies in diabetes. The incorporation of extracellular matrix components into these models improves cell survival, proliferation, and function, making them more robust and reliable for research and therapeutic applications (Zhao et al., 2021).

The studies presented by Pagliuca et al., Candiello et al., and Wang et al., have explored various strategies to optimize the culture of islet organoids, aiming to obtain more physiologically relevant models for the study of diabetes and cell therapy (Zhang et al., 2022). Pagliuca et al. demonstrated that suspension culture, using a shaking system, can generate cell clusters with characteristics like native islets (Millman et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2021). Candiello et al. developed a hydrogel that facilitated the self-aggregation of pancreatic progenitor cells, resulting in an increase in the population of cells co-expressing endocrine differentiation markers (Candiello et al., 2018). Wang et al. used a combined collagen and Matrigel scaffold (C-M scaffold) to promote β-cell maturation and increase insulin production (Tao et al., 2019).

Promising approaches include the generation of pancreatic beta cells from stem cells in 3D cultures, which can be used for transplants in diabetic patients. Organoids, which replicate the multicellular complexity of the pancreas, have been used to study both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, offering an advanced platform for research and treatment development. Progress in 3D in vitro models is leading to a deeper understanding of diabetes and the development of more effective treatments for the disease (Shahjalal et al., 2018).