<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-4185</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1409996</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2024.1409996</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Bioengineering and Biotechnology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Fertilizer management practices in potato cultivation: a baseline study for the introduction of GE potato in Bangladesh</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Nahiyan et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1409996">10.3389/fbioe.2024.1409996</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Nahiyan</surname>
<given-names>Abu Shamim Mohammad</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2343501/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>Saiful</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2704145/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>Aparna</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2297044/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname>
<given-names>Mohammad Ataur</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2781940/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hasan</surname>
<given-names>Mohammad Mahmood</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2610330/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eusufzai</surname>
<given-names>Tasnin Khan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Afreen</surname>
<given-names>Mohsina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ansarey</surname>
<given-names>Fareyzul Haque</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>Tahmina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Uddin</surname>
<given-names>A. F. M. Jamal</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Advanced Seed Research and Biotech Centre</institution>, <institution>ACI Limited</institution>, <addr-line>Dhaka</addr-line>, <country>Bangladesh</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>National Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation &#x26; Utilization of Horticultural Crops</institution>, <institution>Huazhong Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Wuhan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Biotechnology Program</institution>, <institution>Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences</institution>, <institution>BRAC University</institution>, <addr-line>Dhaka</addr-line>, <country>Bangladesh</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Department of Microbiology and Cell Science</institution>, <institution>University of Florida</institution>, <addr-line>Gainesville</addr-line>, <addr-line>FL</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Department of Horticulture</institution>, <institution>Faculty of Agriculture</institution>, <institution>Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Dhaka</addr-line>, <country>Bangladesh</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/162043/overview">Joerg Romeis</ext-link>, Agroscope, Switzerland</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1273271/overview">Zabed Hossain</ext-link>, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1837415/overview">Phetole Mangena</ext-link>, Department of Biodiversity, University of Limpopo, South Africa, South Africa</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Abu Shamim Mohammad Nahiyan, <email>nahiyan80@hotmail.com</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn001">
<label>
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</label>
<p>These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>12</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1409996</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>31</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>10</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Nahiyan, Islam, Islam, Rahman, Hasan, Eusufzai, Afreen, Ansarey, Khan and Uddin.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Nahiyan, Islam, Islam, Rahman, Hasan, Eusufzai, Afreen, Ansarey, Khan and Uddin</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Genetically engineered (GE) crops have the potential to contribute to agricultural sustainability, food security, and nutritional enrichment. However, these crops cannot be released for commercial cultivation without undergoing environmental risk assessments (ERA), thus biosafety evaluation. ERA assessments are performed comparatively with their natural non-GE counterparts. As Bangladesh is progressing with GE potato research, the present study aims to collect baseline information on non-GE potato cultivation with an emphasis on current agronomic practices focusing on fertilizer management and farmers&#x2019; knowledge base. The survey had three parts, including information on the farmers, information on potato cultivation practices, especially fertilizer use, and lastly, the farmer&#x2019;s view on GE potato. From 2020 to 2021, data were collected through interviews with experienced growers in four potato-growing regions, the Central and Mid-East, North-West, Mid-West, and South-East regions (n &#x3d; 1757) of the country. The study revealed that farmers of all regions used more than the recommended amounts of fertilizer; for instance, 67.1% more nitrogen fertilizer was applied as an extra dose during potato cultivation in Munshiganj (Central and Mid-East) than in the Dinajpur region (North-West). This overuse of nitrogen fertilizer can enhance plant vigor but makes the plants more susceptible to insect attraction and allows pests easier access to the plants. As a result, the excess dose of nitrogen fertilizer in Munshiganj may act as a catalyst to increase the probability of late blight. The findings also showed that 73.6% of farmers observed unexpected flowering in certain potato cultivars, which corresponded to the higher application of phosphate and potassium fertilizers aimed at late blight control. Furthermore, this study reported infestations of Solanaceous weeds, specifically <italic>Solanum torvum</italic> and <italic>Physalis heterophylla</italic>, in potato fields. Finally, our findings demonstrated that more than 68.7% of the potato growers intend to adopt disease-resistant GE potato as that may reduce the need for excess fertilizer use and thus reduce cultivation costs.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>agronomic practices</kwd>
<kwd>baseline data</kwd>
<kwd>biosafety assessment</kwd>
<kwd>fertilizer management</kwd>
<kwd>potato</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Biosafety and Biosecurity</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic>), belonging to the family Solanaceae, is a staple food and the world&#x2019;s fourth most important crop after rice, wheat, and maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Islam et al., 2017</xref>). Bangladesh ranks as the seventh largest potato-growing country globally and third-largest in Asia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Crops. FAOSTAT, 2018</xref>). Recent data indicate that Bangladesh is self-sufficient in potato production, yielding 9.87 million metric tons by cultivating 468.7 thousand hectares of land (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">BBS, 2023</xref>). Despite this impressive production, potato exports are significantly hindered due to their compromised quality, which results from various diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mittler, 2006</xref>).</p>
<p>Potato is highly susceptible to various diseases caused by fungi, viruses, and bacteria, resulting in significant crop damage and yield loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Islam et al., 2022</xref>). Farmers commonly use fungicides and insecticides to combat these infestations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kromann et al., 2009</xref>). However, the extensive use of these chemicals raises serious food safety and environmental concerns, highlighting the need for alternative disease management strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Islam et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Plant breeders have worked relentlessly for centuries to develop improved crop varieties with enhanced disease resistance. Although most disease-resistant crops have been developed through conventional and molecular breeding approaches, these methods have limitations, for instance, limited genetic resources within the gene pool, cross-incompatibility, and prolonged development phases. Genetic engineering can overcome these barriers by allowing the integration of beneficial genes from any source into targeted crops, providing tolerance and resistance against both abiotic and biotic stresses in a shorter breeding time. Moreover, considering the adverse impacts of chemical treatments, the introduction of disease-resistant potato varieties through genetic engineering offers a feasible and environment-friendly alternative for disease control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lozoya-Saldana, 2011</xref>). Experience from nearly 3&#xa0;decades of commercial cultivation of various GE crops has demonstrated its benefits to the growers. Therefore, the adoption of GE crops is rising globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bhajan et al., 2022</xref>), particularly in developing countries like Bangladesh (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">James, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>In 2013, Bangladesh became a biotech country by adopting Bt eggplant, a genetically modified variety developed by introducing the Cry1Ac gene from <italic>B. thuringiensis</italic>, which provides resistance against eggplant fruit and shoot borer (EFSB) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Shelton et al., 2018</xref>). In 2023, commercial cultivation of Bt cotton began, which was developed by inserting the same gene of the Cry family (<italic>Cry1AC</italic>) as Bt brinjal from <italic>Bacillus thuringiensis</italic>, conferring resistance to cotton bollworm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">ISAAA, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Sujan et al., 2024</xref>). Bangladesh has been engaged in research on GE potato since 2006, and to date, several confined field trials were conducted on late blight (LB) resistant potato developed by introgression of three LB resistance genes, <italic>Rpi-mcq1, Rpi-blb2, and Rpivnt1.1</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Potatopro, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">USDA, 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>However, the commercial cultivation of GE crops requires prior biosafety assessments to ensure environmental safety. According to the Guidelines for the Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) of Genetically Engineered (GE) Plants 2016, one key issue to consider is the comparison of cultivation practices between GE and non-GE natural counterparts. Agronomic performance and crop physiology also need to be evaluated during these assessments. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the common cultivation practices employed by Bangladeshi farmers for potato cultivation and to identify potential changes that may occur with the introduction of the GE potato.</p>
<p>Considering the above-mentioned issues, a foundational survey was conducted throughout the potato-growing season to collect information from both potato growers and seed potato producers. The study aimed to understand their approaches to fertilizer management and other agricultural practices during potato cultivation. To achieve this goal, several specific objectives were outlined, including i) Collecting baseline information on potato cultivation, ii) Gathering data on the use of macro and micronutrients in the form of manures and fertilizers in potato cultivation, and iii) Understanding the attitude of Bangladeshi potato growers toward GE potato.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Demographic site selection</title>
<p>A total of 1,757 potato growers were randomly interviewed across various upazilas, taking into account the diversity in climate and soil types across regions, with consideration given to their varying levels of academic knowledge and financial circumstances. A total of 16 study locations have been selected from the four major potato-growing regions in Bangladesh, namely, i) Central and Mid-East (Munshiganj and Gazipur districts, n &#x3d; 404), ii) North-West (Panchagarh and Dinajpur districts, n &#x3d; 527), iii) Mid-West (Joypurhat and Bogura districts, n &#x3d; 439), and iv) South-East (Cumilla and Chattogram districts, n &#x3d; 387) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). Each region was represented by two districts, and within each district, two upazilas were chosen for data collection and analysis.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Geographic distribution of survey sites across Bangladesh, encompassing four study regions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1409996-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Survey</title>
<p>This survey was carried out by the Advanced Seed Research and Biotech Centre (ASRBC), ACI Ltd., Dhaka, Bangladesh. In this survey, information and data were collected from farmers owning at least 10 decimals (1 decimal &#x3d; 435.56 sq. feet) of land for potato cultivation. The potato growers from each region were selected through a standard field survey technique (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">BBS, 2014</xref>). The risk impacts survey consisted of five parts: 1) fertilizer management, 2) agronomic practices, 3) disease and insect infestation, 4) weed infestation, and 5) knowledge and willingness about GE technology among farmers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Data collection methods</title>
<p>The data collected through a pre-tested questionnaire were tabulated, processed, and analyzed, keeping in view the goal and objectives of the study. Information and data were collected by a team of 16 designated enumerators, with two enumerators assigned to each district, as part of this comprehensive survey conducted among farmers. The questionnaire included several key data indicators, encompassing the farmer&#x2019;s demographic information such as name, age, sex, and education, as well as details regarding farm size, agricultural practices, and the management of manures and fertilizers. Additionally, the questionnaire also addressed the recommended doses of fertilizer, potential risks, and economic damages stemming from insect or pest infestations in potato cultivation. It also inquired about the effectiveness of the farmers&#x2019; weed, insect, or pest control measures and assessed their attitudes toward acceptance of advanced technology for potato production. A theoretical working model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>) was utilized that integrates the innovation adoption model by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Rogers et al. (2003)</xref> with the construct of attitude from the attitudinal models by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fishbein and Ajzen (1975)</xref>, as outlined in the research model proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kwade et al. (2019)</xref>. This approach enabled us to identify factors related to agronomic practices in potato cultivation, explore the risks associated with potato farming, and examine the attitudes of the people of Bangladesh toward genetic engineering (GE) technology.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Research model of the study.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1409996-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Statistical analysis</title>
<p>To evaluate the association between attitudinal variables, bivariate Pearson correlation analysis was used with the help of GraphPad Prism 9.00, United States. A paired sample <italic>t</italic>-test was used to examine the differences between the opinions. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify significant variables of growers&#x2019; perceptions of major obstacles in potato production and willingness to adapt GE technology for potatoes. As a result of allocating the response categories, the dependent variable was transformed into a variable with two categories (yes/no). This strategy was used because our primary objective was to estimate the likelihood that people will accept the GE potato (willing or not) while also allowing for the assessment of differences between the indifferent farmers and the intended adapters or non-adapters. Because of the strong correlation between farm size (ha) and potato cultivation area (ha), the latter was not included in the model. Gender was excluded from the socio-demographic variables due to its extremely skewed distribution toward male farmers. Knowledge of GE technology, ethical and socio-economic concerns, and environmental benefits were entered as continuous variables in the model, whereas farm size, farmer education level, number of fertilizer applications, age, and experience in potato cultivation were included as dummy variables. The demographic information about participants (n &#x3d; 1757) is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, and the questionnaire containing the statements chosen for data collection and analysis is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Gender, age group, and academic qualification of the study population (n &#x3d; 1757).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Demographic profile</th>
<th align="center">Category</th>
<th align="center">Number</th>
<th align="center">Percentage (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" align="center">Gender</td>
<td align="left">Male</td>
<td align="center">1729</td>
<td align="center">98.40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Female</td>
<td align="center">28</td>
<td align="center">1.60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="5" align="center">Age group</td>
<td align="left">18&#x2013;20 years</td>
<td align="center">26</td>
<td align="center">1.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">21&#x2013;30 years</td>
<td align="center">504</td>
<td align="center">28.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">31&#x2013;40 years</td>
<td align="center">761</td>
<td align="center">43.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">41&#x2013;50 years</td>
<td align="center">365</td>
<td align="center">20.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Over 50 years</td>
<td align="center">101</td>
<td align="center">5.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="4" align="center">Academic qualification</td>
<td align="left">Elementary school</td>
<td align="center">763</td>
<td align="center">44.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Secondary school</td>
<td align="center">543</td>
<td align="center">30.90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Higher secondary school</td>
<td align="center">390</td>
<td align="center">19.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">University</td>
<td align="center">61</td>
<td align="center">5.10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>The demographic characteristics of the study participants, detailing their gender distribution, age groups, and academic qualifications, are presented. The total sample size was 1757 individuals.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Selected statements on common agronomic practices during potato cultivation in Bangladesh according to the questionnaire.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Statement</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">1. Both organic (cow dung and ash) and inorganic (chemical fertilizers) fertilizers are frequently used in potato cultivation across the country<break/>2. Basal dosage as the granular form is used to apply TSP (P), magnesium (Mg), gypsum (S), and boron (B), except urea (N) and MOP (K) fertilizers, during the last plowing of the soil preparation<break/>3. Urea and MOP are applied as split doses in the first and second earthing up of potato cultivation<break/>4. Micronutrients: boron (B), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and manganese (Mn) are supplied in liquid form<break/>5. High dependence on fertilizers in potato cultivation is not only for plant growth enhancement but also for disease management<break/>6. Several weeds (<italic>S. torvum</italic>, <italic>P. heterophylla</italic>, <italic>A. philoxeroides</italic>, <italic>C. album,</italic> and <italic>A. viridis</italic>) have been identified in potato fields and are primarily managed manually<break/>7. Groundwater dependency for irrigation is very high<break/>8. The advanced agronomic practices that are employed in quality potato production (processing and export quality) globally are largely unknown to farmers<break/>9. After harvesting, plant debris is left in the field<break/>10. Late blight, virus infestation, and scab disease are the most common diseases that significantly affect potato quality and yield in the country<break/>11. Excessive pesticides and insecticides are frequently used to control diseases<break/>12. Farmers have no knowledge about environmental pollution when applying fertilizers and pesticides in the potato field<break/>13. Positive attitudes have been shown among the farmers in the acceptance of disease-resistant and high-yielding GE potato varieties</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>These statements from the questionnaires reflected common agronomic practices employed during potato cultivation in Bangladesh. These statements are designed to capture key aspects of agricultural methods and techniques used by local farmers.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<p>The findings of the survey have been categorized and presented in several ways to demonstrate the current state of potato production as well as potential strategies of fertilizer management and agronomic practices for the introduction of GE potato in Bangladesh.</p>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Demographic information</title>
<p>According to the demographic profile of the respondents (n &#x3d; 1757), the sample consisted of a group of participants with characteristics that reflected the diversity of the research population (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The gender distribution was 98.4% male and 1.6% female, reflecting the typically male-dominated agricultural profession. Most of the total study population had more than 10 years of experience in cultivating potato (data not shown). In addition, the largest age group of participants, at 43.3%, was people between the ages of 31 and 40 years. In terms of formal education, only 5.1% of the participants held a college-level degree, while 44.8% had only elementary education.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Responses to the statements</title>
<p>In the designated four regions, respondents were interviewed face-to-face regarding the current state of potato production technology, fertilizer management practices, disease and weed infestation, and their attitudes toward adopting GE crops. During the interviews, 13 statements were selected from the questionnaire to reflect the specific aims of the proposed study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Most farmers in the survey regions followed conventional fertilizer application strategies (statements 1&#x2013;5). During land preparation, they applied both organic and inorganic fertilizers as basal doses. Additionally, liquid fertilizers were often applied during the growing stages to address macro- and micronutrient deficiencies. Weed diversity is a vital cause of yield reduction and was managed manually to maintain the nutritional balance in potato plants (statement 6). None of the farmers expressed concern about the biosafety issues that could arise from plant debris residues during haulm pulling or potato harvesting (statement 9). Furthermore, most participants expressed positive attitudes toward adopting disease-resistant genetically engineered (GE) crops, which aim to reduce yield losses due to pests. This adoption would help address challenges in disease management and production losses, thereby supporting farmers in generating higher profits.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Assessment of the existing fertilizer management scenario</title>
<p>Generally, farmers in Bangladesh depend on the traditional system of potato cultivation. They follow the recommended doses of fertilizer outlined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Azad et al. (2019)</xref> to achieve a significant increase in production (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Nonetheless, during the survey, it was observed that the major fertilizers, such as urea (N), TSP (P), and MOP (K), were applied excessively in potato cultivation. In the Central and Mid-East region, nitrogen fertilizer was applied at 134.0% of the recommended dose, amounting to 250&#xa0;kg/ha. Whereas in the North-West, phosphorus was applied at 163.3% of the recommended dose, and potassium was applied at 117.2% of the recommended dose. The recommended amounts are 150&#xa0;kg/ha and 250&#xa0;kg/ha, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Fertilizer management practices of the four regions compared to the recommended dose for potato cultivation in Bangladesh.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Fertilizer</th>
<th align="center">Recommended dose (kg/ha)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</th>
<th align="center">Central and Mid-East (kg/ha)</th>
<th align="center">North-West (kg/ha)</th>
<th align="center">Mid-West (kg/ha)</th>
<th align="center">South-East (kg/ha)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Urea</td>
<td align="center">250</td>
<td align="center">585</td>
<td align="center">350</td>
<td align="center">360</td>
<td align="center">385</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">TSP</td>
<td align="center">150</td>
<td align="center">298</td>
<td align="center">395</td>
<td align="center">325</td>
<td align="center">243</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">MOP</td>
<td align="center">250</td>
<td align="center">385</td>
<td align="center">543</td>
<td align="center">487</td>
<td align="center">363</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Gypsum</td>
<td align="center">120</td>
<td align="center">115</td>
<td align="center">121</td>
<td align="center">119</td>
<td align="center">118</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Zinc sulfate</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">11</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Magnesium sulfate</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">95</td>
<td align="center">98</td>
<td align="center">100</td>
<td align="center">112</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Boric acid</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">9</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
<td align="center">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cow dung</td>
<td align="center">9,071</td>
<td align="center">4,580</td>
<td align="center">5,690</td>
<td align="center">4,500</td>
<td align="center">5,600</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>
<sup>a</sup>
</label>
<p>Recommended doses reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Azad et al., 2019</xref> in the <italic>Krishi Projukti Hatboi</italic> (<italic>Handbook on Agro-Technology</italic>). Published by the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI).</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Comparing these fertilizer management practices across four different regions with the recommended fertilizer doses highlighted variations in nutrient application and adherence to agricultural guidelines during potato cultivation in Bangladesh.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In addition, significant differences were found in the excessive application of TSP and MOP during potato cultivation among the four studied regions. During cultivation, early physiological maturity of potato plants followed by induced flowering was observed in these fields. Among our interviewees, 73.6% of farmers reported observing unexpected flowering in some potato varieties when they applied more TSP and MOP fertilizer than the recommended dose to control late blight disease (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). On the other hand, the potato growers of Central and Mid-east assumed that the excessive use of urea may increase the potato yields. The line graph (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>) illustrates the relationship between the percentage of excess urea usage in the Central and Mid-East region compared to the other three studied regions, namely, the South-East, the Mid-West, and the North-West region. The data revealed that the difference in urea application between the Central and Mid-East region and the South-East, at 51.9%, is the lowest. In contrast, the discrepancy in urea usage between the Central and Mid-East and the North-West was the highest at 67.1% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Induced flowering (%) in potato resulting from overuse of TSP and MOP across the four study regions; <sup>abc</sup> indicates a significant difference at <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.05 among the regions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1409996-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison (%) between Central and Mid-East with the other three regions in the case of excessive urea application during potato cultivation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1409996-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 Obstacles to potato cultivation</title>
<p>A significant portion of the interviewed farmers identified various diseases, such as late blight, virus infection, scab, etc., as the most severe challenge in potato cultivation, leading to substantial crop damage and yield loss. In the North-West, approximately 35.4% of farmers reported significant yield loss and quality deterioration due to these diseases, while 32.7% of farmers in the Mid-West experienced similar issues. Our survey found that late blight was the most devastating disease, reported by approximately 10.7%&#x2013;19.1% of respondents (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>). Approximately 23.0% of respondents reported insect and pest attacks in the North-West region, and 15.25% of respondents in the Mid-West identified weed infestation as a major problem in their potato fields. Moreover, due to adverse calamity, excessive rainfall was also observed in the dry season by 2.2%&#x2013;7.4% of the farmers. This rainfall caused severe water management problems followed by crop damage due to disease outbreaks, especially late blight. Additionally, inadequate storage facilities were reported by 3.1%&#x2013;11.9% of respondents; inadequate storage causes massive tuber loss by different fungal and bacterial infections. Moreover, due to rising costs and the scarcity of fertilizers and insecticides in the market, farmers struggled to grow potatoes profitably.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Growers&#x2019; perceptions (%) of major obstacles observed in potato production across the four study regions.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Obstacle</th>
<th colspan="5" align="center">Response (%) to major obstacles</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">Central and Mid-East</th>
<th align="center">North-West</th>
<th align="center">Mid-West</th>
<th align="center">South-East</th>
<th align="center">LSD</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">1. Disease infection</td>
<td align="center">29.00 &#xb1; 0.447<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">35.40 &#xb1; 0.435<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">32.69 &#xb1; 1.249<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">23.57 &#xb1; 1.086b<sup>cd</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">2.536</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;a. Late blight</td>
<td align="center">12.50</td>
<td align="center">19.10</td>
<td align="center">15.80</td>
<td align="center">10.75</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;b. Virus</td>
<td align="center">9.40</td>
<td align="center">11.60</td>
<td align="center">10.30</td>
<td align="center">7.60</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x2003;c. Scab</td>
<td align="center">7.10</td>
<td align="center">4.70</td>
<td align="center">6.59</td>
<td align="center">5.22</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2. Insect attack</td>
<td align="center">14.62 &#xb1; 0.388<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">23.00 &#xb1; 0.471<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">19.00 &#xb1; 0.453<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">11.70 &#xb1; 0.494<sup>bcd</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1.301</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3. Weed infestation</td>
<td align="center">9.35 &#xb1; 0.212<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">11.25 &#xb1; 0.700<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">15.25 &#xb1; 0.366<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">8.50 &#xb1; 0.500<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1.375</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4. Lack of irrigation facilities</td>
<td align="center">8.40 &#xb1; 0.600<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">7.00 &#xb1; 0.391<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">4.20 &#xb1; 0.493<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">5.30 &#xb1; 0.251<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1.298</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5. Pest attack in storage</td>
<td align="center">13.80 &#xb1; 0.872<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">9.10 &#xb1; 0.524<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">10.70 &#xb1; 0.626<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">10.75 &#xb1; 0.656<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1.956</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6. Excessive rainfall</td>
<td align="center">2.16 &#xb1; 0.314<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">4.75 &#xb1; 0.395<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">3.56 &#xb1; 0.382<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">7.36 &#xb1; 0.423<sup>bcd</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1.093</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7. Lack of storage facilities</td>
<td align="center">8.80 &#xb1; 0.694<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">3.10 &#xb1; 0.202<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">4.70 &#xb1; 0.394<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">11.90 &#xb1; 0.908<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1.758</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">8. Lack of accuracy in pricing</td>
<td align="center">9.89 &#xb1; 0.613<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">2.00 &#xb1; 0.168<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">5.50 &#xb1; 0.526<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">13.96 &#xb1; 0.817<sup>bcd</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1.666</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">9. Problems to collect agrochemicals</td>
<td align="center">0.50 &#xb1; 0.092<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">3.80 &#xb1; 0.354<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">1.80 &#xb1; 0.129<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">2.87 &#xb1; 0.316<sup>bcd</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">0.719</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">10. Others</td>
<td align="center">3.48 &#xb1; 0.127<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">0.60 &#xb1; 0.115<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">2.60 &#xb1; 0.214<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">4.09 &#xb1; 0.259<sup>bcd</sup>
</td>
<td align="center">0.542</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>
<sup>abc</sup> indicates a significant difference at <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.05 among the regions.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>The data show the percentage distribution of growers&#x2019; perceptions of major obstacles in potato production across four study regions, highlighting regional differences and localized issues. Significant differences were observed among the regions at <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>3.5 Weed diversity</title>
<p>The farmers mentioned weed infestation in their potato fields. <italic>S. torvum</italic>, <italic>P. heterophylla</italic>, <italic>Alternanthera philoxeroides</italic>, <italic>C. album,</italic> and <italic>Amaranthus viridis</italic> weeds are generally found in potato fields in Bangladesh (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Farmers observed weeds in their potato fields at approximately 30 DAP (days after planting). <italic>Solanum torvum</italic>, <italic>Physalis heterophylla,</italic> and <italic>A. philoxeroides</italic> are from the Solanaceae family. <italic>Chenopodium album</italic> and <italic>A. viridis</italic> are from the Amaranthaceae family. Among the five mentioned weeds, <italic>A. viridis</italic> (28%) and <italic>S. torvum</italic> (23%) were found to have high densities in the Central and Mid-East and South-East regions compared to the other regions. These weeds significantly reduce productivity by competing with potato crops for nutrients. Respondents from the North-West and Mid-West regions reported the existence of vectors, namely, aphids that cause rapid virus transmission, while weed infestation was also observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>). These reports indicate there was a strong and positive association between pests and weed infestation.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Weed diversity during potato cultivation among the four study regions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1409996-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship (%) between aphid and weed infestation in potato fields across the four study regions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1409996-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>3.6 Willingness to adopt GE crops</title>
<p>The knowledge and keenness to accept the GE technology were evaluated among the participants interviewed, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7</xref>. In this study, we observed that more than 50% of interviewees were willing to integrate GE potatoes into their potato cultivation system as they think GE crops will have high yield potential and their disease resistance may also reduce cultivation costs. The Central and Mid-East region showed the highest enthusiasm for adopting GE technology, with 76% of participants expressing willingness, while the South-East region had the lowest at 58%.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Willingness to adopt GE technology among farmers in the four study regions (<sup>abc</sup> indicates a significant difference at <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.05 among the regions).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1409996-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<p>The statistical populations for this survey in the four regions were mostly regular farmers with more than 10 years of experience. Respondents (n &#x3d; 1757) were grouped based on their gender, age, and educational qualifications, as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">De Steur et al. (2019)</xref> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). To ensure the effectiveness of the study, a purposeful random sample technique was utilized to choose respondents from various regions. This approach aimed to determine fertilizer management procedures, cultural practices, and farmer attitudes toward genetically engineered (GE) potato, which was reflected through the 13 statements in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. This methodology was supported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Areal et al. (2011)</xref>, who summarized farmers&#x2019; attitudes toward genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops with 24 statements.</p>
<p>Though Bangladesh produces a huge amount of potato, the quality of potato has undergone several challenges due to biotic and abiotic stresses. In terms of the use of fertilizers, we have recorded that all of the interviewed farmers applied more fertilizer than the recommended dose with an expectation of higher yield and better disease management (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Similar phenomena were observed in a study where the farmers of Munshiganj applied 3&#x2013;4 times higher doses of urea, TSP, and MOP fertilizers than was recommended for a potato field (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Choudhury et al., 2006</xref>). We observed that this attitude was more frequent among farmers who did not have a high school or college diploma. Due to a lack of proper education and understanding of fertilizers, including their mode of action, most of the farmers in Bangladesh believe that a higher application would benefit them with a higher yield and, thus, more profit.</p>
<p>Consequently, in this survey, 73.6% of farmers reported that an extra amount of TSP and MOP fertilizer could reduce the devastating damage to potatoes by controlling late blight diseases in the North-West and Mid-West regions. The high cost of pesticides or herbicides might be one reason behind the using extra fertilizers to tackle pests and pathogens. Apart from this, potato plants that received an excessive amount of TSP and MOP for a prolonged period experienced an unexpected flowering and physiological maturity compared to plants that received the recommended rate of fertilizer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). The result of this survey is consistent with that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Setu et al. (2018)</xref>, who observed the same effect of TSP and MOP. They reported these fertilizers did not affect potato phenotype, growth parameters, or tuber yields; however, they had a significant impact on days to unexpected flowering, physiological maturity, plant height, leaf area, above and underground dry biomasses, and marketable yield.</p>
<p>In addition to TSP and MOP, we observed that 67.1% of excess urea as a nitrogen source was applied in Munshiganj (Central and Mid-East) compared to Dinajpur (North-West) during potato cultivation. Moreover, a relationship between the percentages of excessive use of urea in the Central and Mid-East region compared with three other regions, namely, the South-East, the Mid-West, and the North-West regions, was studied. Given that the recommended dose of urea application was 250&#xa0;kg/ha, each region was noted to overuse this fertilizer, especially the Central and Mid-East region. Excessive amounts of urea produce more succulent vegetative parts, leading to increased plant vigor with darker green coloration, which in turn attracts more insects and pests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Singh and Sarkar, 2021</xref>). This may act as a catalyst to increase the probability of late blight and boost insect infestation and virus infection.</p>
<p>Apart from the disease infestations, several other obstacles were recorded during potato cultivation, including the absence of suitable germplasm, difficulties in water management, lack of storage facilities, unexpected weather, etc. (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>). Similar obstacles were also reported during potato cultivation in Bangladesh by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hoque et al. (2023)</xref>. In the case of water management, farmers faced obstacles to managing groundwater for irrigation and unexpected rainfall, which directly hampered the yield. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Sun et al. (2015)</xref> found that the frequency of watering at different phases of potato growth and development impacts the production and quality of the crop.</p>
<p>Weeds also pose significant challenges in potato production in Bangladesh through nutrient uptake and playing host to pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Showler and Granberg, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Faruq et al., 2021</xref>). Potato yield reduction due to weed competition was extensively documented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Rana et al. (2004)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Attri et al. (2022)</xref>. The present study observed that <italic>S</italic>. <italic>torvum</italic>, <italic>P</italic>. <italic>heterophylla</italic>, <italic>A</italic>. <italic>philoxeroides</italic>, <italic>C</italic>. <italic>album,</italic> and <italic>A</italic>. <italic>viridis</italic> are some of the weed species in potato fields. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Khan et al. (2008)</xref> demonstrated that <italic>C</italic>. <italic>album</italic> and <italic>A</italic>. <italic>viridis</italic> are the main weed species in the potato fields of Bangladesh. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cuda et al. (2002)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Khokon et al. (2017)</xref> showed that <italic>S</italic>. <italic>torvum</italic> and <italic>P</italic>. <italic>heterophylla</italic> are major weeds of the Solanaceae family. Moreover, many insects, including aphids, thrips, whiteflies, and leafhoppers, transmit plant diseases from weeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Capinera, 2005</xref>). Future studies may be needed to assess the potential outcrossing among these weeds and potato.</p>
<p>The current survey aimed to study the agronomic practices of potato cultivation in Bangladesh along with the effect of fertilizer on crop performance, the weed population, and overall challenges during cultivation. The final goal is to understand farmers&#x2019; willingness to adopt GE potato. The study reveals a willingness among farmers to adopt genetically engineered (GE) potatoes. However, the acceptance level varies among the study regions. Several studies have shown that the variation in acceptance due to the presence and absence of effective science communication about the benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Farid et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdul Aziz et al., 2022</xref>), cultural attitudes, support systems, and local agricultural services (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Koralesky et al., 2023</xref>). In the future, the reason for the variation in the study regions may be assessed.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>The study was conducted in four major potato cultivation areas of Bangladesh. Farmers with more than a decade of experience in potato cultivation were interviewed. The growers&#x2019; responses showed that fertilizers are usually applied at higher-than-recommended doses to ensure optimum yield while controlling disease infestation by making the plants vigorous. This overdose was found to correspond to early flowering in the field. Common weed populations were also recorded in the study. Several cultivation challenges, including diseases and pest infestations, were mentioned in response to the questions asked during the survey. A large percentage of farmers opined in favor of the cultivation of GE potato due to their understanding that it will give higher yield and disease resistance. However, the questions also revealed their lack of in-depth knowledge of GE crops. The present study deals with farmers&#x2019; agronomic practices and observations about potato cultivation. This can partially fulfill the required baseline data for ERA prior to the introduction of GE potato in Bangladesh.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>Ethical review and approval were not required for the study on human participants in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent from the patients/participants OR patients/participants legal guardian/next of kin was not required to participate in this study in accordance with the national legislation and the institutional requirements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AN: conceptualization, supervision, writing&#x2013;original draft, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. SI: methodology, project administration, writing&#x2013;original draft, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. AI: conceptualization, formal analysis, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. MR: data curation, resources, and writing&#x2013;original draft. MH: data curation, methodology, and writing&#x2013;original draft. TE: funding acquisition, resources, and writing&#x2013;original draft. MA: data curation, funding acquisition, and writing&#x2013;original draft. FA: investigation, validation, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. TK: methodology, resources, and writing&#x2013;original draft. AU: supervision, validation, and writing&#x2013;review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s9">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was jointly supported by USAID, AFSI, and SABP&#x2019;s &#x201c;Biosafety Research in Bangladesh Grants Program (BRBGP) &#x2013; 2020,&#x201d; which provided funding for the project entitled &#x201c;Study on fertilizer management and agricultural practices of potato cultivation in Bangladesh, Proposal ID Number: BRBGP-2020-11.&#x201d;</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>The authors gratefully acknowledge Professor Md. Abdus Siddique, Ph.D., for supporting the projects by sharing his vast knowledge of the potato industry in Bangladesh.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s10">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>Authors AN, SI, MR, MH, TE, MA, and FA were employed by ACI Limited.</p>
<p>The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
<p>The handling editor, JR, is currently organizing a research topic with the author AI.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s11">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdul Aziz</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brini</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rouached</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Masmoudi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Genetically engineered crops for sustainably enhanced food production systems</article-title>. <source>Front. plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1027828</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1027828</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Areal</surname>
<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riesgo</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez&#x2010;Cerezo</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Attitudes of European farmers towards GM crop adoption</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>945</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>957</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00651.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Attri</surname>
<given-names>M. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sagar</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nesar</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhochalaya</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sandhu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Weed management in vegetables and flower crops in India</article-title>. <source>Pharma Innovation J.</source> <volume>sp-11</volume>, <fpage>652</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>661</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Azad</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wahab</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaha</surname>
<given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nesa</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname>
<given-names>M. H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Krishi prajukti Hatboi (handbook on agro-technology)</source>. <publisher-loc>Gazipur, Bangladesh</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>BBS</collab> (<year>2014</year>). <source>BBS (Bangladesh bureau of statistics)</source>. <publisher-loc>Dhaka, Bangladesh</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>BBS</collab> (<year>2023</year>). <source>BBS (Bangladesh bureau of statistics)</source>. <publisher-loc>Dhaka, Bangladesh</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhajan</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasan</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haque</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>Genetically modified food for ensuring food security issues</source>. <publisher-loc>London, United Kingdom</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IntechOpen</publisher-name>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5772/intechopen.106810</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Capinera</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Relationships between insect pests and weeds: an evolutionary perspective</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>892</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>901</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1614/ws-04-049r.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Choudhury</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quayyum</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hossain</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasan</surname>
<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <source>Project completion report SFFP II (1999-2006)</source> (<publisher-loc>Joydebpur, Gazipur</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>On Farm Research Division. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute</publisher-name>), <fpage>383</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Crops. FAOSTAT</collab> (<year>2018</year>). <source>Crops. FAOSTAT</source>. <comment>Retrieved 12 October 2018</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cuda</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parker</surname>
<given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coon</surname>
<given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasquez</surname>
<given-names>F. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harrison</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of exotic Solanum spp. (Solanales: Solanaceae) in Florida as host plants for the leaf beetles <italic>Leptinotarsa defecta</italic> and <italic>L. texana</italic> (Coleoptera: chrysomelidae)</article-title>. <source>Fla. Entomol.</source> <volume>85</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>599</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>610</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0599:eoesss]2.0.co;2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Steur</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Loo</surname>
<given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maes</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gheysen</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verbeke</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Farmers&#x2019; willingness to adopt late blight-resistant genetically modified potatoes</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>280</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy9060280</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farid</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lim</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arato</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kodama</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Exploring factors affecting the acceptance of genetically edited food among youth in Japan</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>2935</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph17082935</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Faruq</surname>
<given-names>M. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>M. S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uddin</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alam</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hassan</surname>
<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of different weed management practices on yield of potato in Chattogram hill districts of Bangladesh</article-title>. <source>Asian J. Plant Soil Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>239</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>244</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fishbein</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ajzen</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1975</year>). <source>Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research</source>. <publisher-loc>Reading, MA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Addison-Wesley</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoque</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nahiyan</surname>
<given-names>A. S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akhter</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <source>Disposal pattern of cold and home stored potato in some selected areas of Bangladesh</source>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA)</collab> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Bangladesh starts planting Bt cotton</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID=20381">https://www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/article/default.asp?ID&#x3d;20381</ext-link>.</comment>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eusufzai</surname>
<given-names>T. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ansarey</surname>
<given-names>F. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasan</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nahiyan</surname>
<given-names>A. S. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A breeding approach to enhance late blight resistance in potato</article-title>. <source>J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>719</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>729</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14620316.2022.2070082</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raihan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nahiyan</surname>
<given-names>A. S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siddique</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Field screening and marker assisted selection of late blight resistant potato lines</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Plant and Soil Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/IJPSS/2018/45301</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siddique</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saha</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nahiyan</surname>
<given-names>A. S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raihan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Study on field performance of six table potato varieties at Debiganj ASRBC station</article-title>. <source>Bangladesh Hortic.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>James</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source>Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops in 2017; biotech crop adoption surges as economic benefits accumulate in 22 years. ISAAA brief No. 53</source>. <publisher-loc>Ithaca, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>ISAAA</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>A. S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hosain</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahmud</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Howlader</surname>
<given-names>M. I. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Integrated weed management in potato at Munshigonj</article-title>. <source>Bangladesh J. agri. Res.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>647</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>654</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3329/bjar.v33i4.2309</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khokon</surname>
<given-names>M. A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aminuzzaman</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das</surname>
<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ullah</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source>Report on pest risk analysis (PRA) of Globodera spp. in Bangladesh</source>. <publisher-loc>Dhaka, Bangladesh</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Government of the People&#x2019;s Republic of Bangladesh Ministry of Agriculture Department of Agriculture Extension</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koralesky</surname>
<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sirovica</surname>
<given-names>L. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hendricks</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mills</surname>
<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>von Keyserlingk</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weary</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Social acceptance of genetic engineering technology</article-title>. <source>Plos one</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>e0290070</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0290070</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kromann</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taipe</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perez</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forbes</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Rainfall thresholds as support for timing fungicide applications in the control of potato late blight in Ecuador and Peru</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>148</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-93-2-0142</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kwade</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lugu</surname>
<given-names>B. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lukman</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quist</surname>
<given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Farmers&#x2019; attitude towards the use of genetically modified crop technology in Southern Ghana: the mediating role of risk perception</article-title>. <source>AIMS Agric. Food</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>833</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>853</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3934/agrfood.2019.4.833</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lozoya-Saldana</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Evolution of vertical and horizontal resistance and its application in breeding resistance to potato late blight</article-title>. <source>Potato J.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mittler</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination</article-title>. <source>Trends plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>Potatopro</collab> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Bangladesh imports two blight resistant (GM) potato lines developed at Michigan State University for a field trial</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.potatopro.com/news/2021/bangladesh-imports-two-blight-resistant-gm-potato-lines-developed-michigan-state?amp">https://www.potatopro.com/news/2021/bangladesh-imports-two-blight-resistant-gm-potato-lines-developed-michigan-state?amp</ext-link>.</comment>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rana</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rana</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Management of complex weed flora in peas with herbicide mixture under Lahual Valley conditions of Himachal Pradesh</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Weed Sci.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>68</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rogers</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singhal</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quinlan</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <source>Diffusion of innovations/Everett M. Rogers</source>. <publisher-loc>NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Simon and Schuster</publisher-name>, <fpage>576</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Setu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dechassa</surname>
<given-names>T. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alemayehu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Influence of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on growth and yield of potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> L.) at Assosa, Benishangul Gumuz Regional State, Western Ethiopia</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci. Environ. Manag.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/JSSEM2016.0568</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shelton</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hossain</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paranjape</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azad</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>A. S. M. M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Bt eggplant project in Bangladesh: history, present status, and future direction</article-title>. <source>Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>106</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2018.00106</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Showler</surname>
<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Granberg</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Effects of weeds on selected arthropod herbivore and natural enemy populations, and on cotton growth and yield</article-title>. <source>Environ. Entomol.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1603/0046-225X-32.1.39</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarkar</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of excess use of fertilizers on insect/pest infestation in Oryza sativa: a review</article-title>. <source>J. Entomology Zoology Stud.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>246</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>252</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22271/j.ento.2021.v9.i5c.8834</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sujan</surname>
<given-names>M. H. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kazal</surname>
<given-names>M. M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akhteruzzaman</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kundu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Economic viability of releasing Bt cotton in Bangladesh: an early insight</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>e30589</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30589</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of irrigation regimes and phosphorus rates on water and phosphorus use efficiencies in potato</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>190</volume>, <fpage>64</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2015.04.017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="web">
<collab>USDA</collab> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Agriculture biotechnology annual report</article-title>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName=Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Dhaka_Bangladesh_10-20-2021">https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/DownloadReportByFileName?fileName&#x3d;Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Dhaka_Bangladesh_10-20-2021</ext-link>.</comment>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>