<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-4185</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1339054</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2024.1339054</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Bioengineering and Biotechnology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Minimizing acetate formation from overflow metabolism in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: comparison of genetic engineering strategies to improve robustness toward sugar gradients in large-scale fermentation processes</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Gecse et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1339054">10.3389/fbioe.2024.1339054</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Gecse</surname>
<given-names>Greta</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002">
<sup>&#x2021;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2346695/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Labunskaite</surname>
<given-names>Rugile</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002">
<sup>&#x2021;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2636872/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pedersen</surname>
<given-names>Margit</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kilstrup</surname>
<given-names>Mogens</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/815441/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Johanson</surname>
<given-names>Ted</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2577965/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-Analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/Writing - review &#x26; editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>dsm-firmenich</institution>, <addr-line>H&#xf8;rsholm</addr-line>, <country>Denmark</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine</institution>, <institution>Technical University of Denmark</institution>, <addr-line>Kgs. Lyngby</addr-line>, <country>Denmark</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1275328/overview">Antonio Valle</ext-link>, University of C&#xe1;diz, Spain</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1115240/overview">Tian-Qiong Shi</ext-link>, Nanjing Normal University, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2066958/overview">Zhengming Zhu</ext-link>, Nanjing Tech University, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/650254/overview">Niels Krausch</ext-link>, Technical University of Berlin, Germany</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Ted Johanson, <email>ted.johanson@dsm-firmenich.com</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="fn1">
<label>
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</label>
<p>
<bold>Present address:</bold> Greta Gecse, Novozymes, Bagsv&#xe6;rd, Denmark</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002">
<label>
<sup>&#x2021;</sup>
</label>
<p>These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>1339054</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>15</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Gecse, Labunskaite, Pedersen, Kilstrup and Johanson.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Gecse, Labunskaite, Pedersen, Kilstrup and Johanson</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<bold>Introduction:</bold> <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, a well characterized workhorse in biotechnology, has been used to produce many recombinant proteins and metabolites, but have a major drawback in its tendency to revert to overflow metabolism. This phenomenon occurs when excess sugar triggers the production of mainly acetate under aerobic conditions, a detrimental by-product that reduces carbon efficiency, increases cell maintenance, and ultimately inhibits growth. Although this can be prevented by controlled feeding of the sugar carbon source to limit its availability, gradients in commercial-scale bioreactors can still induce it in otherwise carbon-limited cells. While the underlying mechanisms have been extensively studied, these have mostly used non-limited cultures. In contrast, industrial production typically employs carbon-limited processes, which results in a substantially different cell physiology.</p>
<p>
<bold>Objective:</bold> The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of different metabolic engineering strategies with the aim to reduce overflow metabolism and increase the robustness of an industrial 2&#x2019;-<italic>O</italic>-fucosyllactose producing strain under industrially relevant conditions.</p>
<p>
<bold>Methods:</bold> Three distinct metabolic engineering strategies were compared: i) alterations to pathways leading to and from acetate, ii) increased flux towards the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and iii) reduced glucose uptake rate. The engineered strains were evaluated for growth, acetate formation, and product yield under non-limiting batch conditions, carbon limited fed-batch conditions, and after a glucose pulse in fed-batch mode.</p>
<p>
<bold>Results and Discussion:</bold> The findings demonstrated that blockage of the major acetate production pathways by deletion of the <italic>pta</italic> and <italic>poxB</italic> genes or increased carbon flux into the TCA cycle by overexpression of the <italic>gltA</italic> and deletion of the <italic>iclR</italic> genes, were efficient ways to reduce acetate accumulation. Surprisingly, a reduced glucose uptake rate did not reduce acetate formation despite it having previously been shown as a very effective strategy. Interestingly, overexpression of <italic>gltA</italic> was the most efficient way to reduce acetate accumulation in non-limited cultures, whereas disruption of the <italic>poxB</italic> and <italic>pta</italic> genes was more effective for carbon-limited cultures exposed to a sudden glucose shock. Strains from both strategies showed increased tolerance towards a glucose pulse during carbon-limited growth indicating feasible ways to engineer industrial <italic>E. coli</italic> strains with enhanced robustness.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>2&#x2019;-<italic>O</italic>-fucosyllactose</kwd>
<kwd>acetate</kwd>
<kwd>overflow metabolism</kwd>
<kwd>genetic engineering</kwd>
<kwd>large-scale fermentation</kwd>
<kwd>tricarboxylic acid cycle</kwd>
<kwd>phosphotransferase system</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">8053-00209B 1044-00049B</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Innovationsfonden<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100012774</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Industrial Biotechnology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Microbial cell factories have become a vital tool for producing a wide range of valuable compounds, including recombinant proteins, bulk and fuel chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical foods and dietary supplements. One such example is human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs): a family of structurally diverse unconjugated glycans that, after lactose and fat, collectively compose the third largest component of mothers&#x2019; milk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bode, 2012</xref>). HMOs are uniquely diverse and abundant in human milk compared to that of domesticated animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Urashima et al., 2013</xref>) and are of particular interest due to their beneficial impact on infants&#x2019; and adults&#x2019; health. Clinical and preclinical data demonstrate that HMOs support gastrointestinal health, immune function and cognitive development (recently reviewed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hill May 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Sprenger et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dinleyici et al., 2023</xref>). They have therefore been introduced into both infant formula as well as into dietary supplementation products for adults (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bych et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Lu, Mosleh, and Abbaspourrad, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">P&#xe9;rez-Escalante et al., 2022</xref>). The most abundant HMO in human milk, 2&#x2019;-<italic>O</italic>-fucosyllactose (2&#x2019;FL), is currently produced on a commercial scale by fermentation using predominantly <italic>E. coli</italic> as production host (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ammann, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Vandenplas et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bych et al., 2019</xref>). These fermentations are fully aerobic and employ a fed-batch feeding strategy with carbon limitation to avoid overflow metabolism, reduce the oxygen transfer rate demand and to maximize the carbon source utilization (using either glucose, sucrose or glycerol as carbon source) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Krause, Neubauer, and Neubauer, 2016</xref>). Unlike batch growth, where cells have unlimited carbon source availability, a fed-batch regulates the availability such that the respiratory metabolism of the cells and oxygen transfer rate capacity of the process are not overwhelmed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Enfors and H&#xe4;ggstr&#xf6;m, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Srivastava and Gupta, 2011</xref>). This will otherwise result in overflow metabolism or anaerobic metabolism and the formation of undesirable metabolic by-products, predominantly in the form of acetate in <italic>E. coli</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Krause et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Millard et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Li et al., 2022</xref>). Not only does acetate production constitute a wasteful use of the carbon source, but acetate also has a toxic effect that hinders growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Pinhal et al., 2019</xref>), decreases the stability of intracellular proteins and limits product yields and titers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Eiteman and Altman, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De Mey, De Maeseneire, et al., 2007</xref>). Such impacts have been observed in <italic>E. coli</italic>, even at relatively low acetate concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Roe et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Warnecke and Gill, 2005</xref>). Despite using a carbon-limited mode of operation during manufacturing, several circumstances in the industrial setting can lead to exposure to elevated sugar concentrations and induce overflow metabolism. The longer mixing times encountered in large-scale commercial vessels lead to the formation of local zones with significantly elevated concentrations around the feed inlet points and concomitant localized acetate formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Larsson et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Enfors and H&#xe4;ggstr&#xf6;m, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Enfors et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Srivastava and Gupta, 2011</xref>). Limitations to the feed control system can also cause unintended exposure to elevated sugar concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Larsson et al., 1996</xref>). Finally, if cells grow slower than expected, the feed profile can exceed the threshold of the specific sugar uptake rate that induces overflow metabolism. Consequently, a slight mismatch between growth and feed rate can lead to a negative spiral of growth inhibition and acetate accumulation that quickly result in a lost fermentation batch (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chrapkova et al., 2023</xref>). This phenomenon has been observed multiple times with different HMO producing <italic>E. coli</italic> strains at the dsm-firmenich manufacturing site in Esbjerg. It is therefore desirable to have a production strain that is resistant to sugar exposure as it leads to more robust processes. Various genetic engineering strategies have been explored to achieve this. However, while mixed-acid metabolism under anaerobic conditions is well-understood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Clark, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">F&#xf6;rster and Gescher, 2014</xref>), the phenomenon of overflow metabolism remains more enigmatic despite decades of research. This has increased the difficulty in devising a successful metabolic engineering strategy. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the occurrence of acetate overflow metabolism despite it being less energy-efficient compared to respiration. This includes more cost-efficient proteome allocation in fermentation compared to respiration during faster growth rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Basan et al., 2015</xref>), limited capacity of respiration resulting from space limitation in the plasma membrane where the electron transport chain is located (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Andersen and von Meyenburg, 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Zhuang, Vemuri, and Mahadevan, 2011</xref>) and saturation of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle) and/or electron transport chain with sugar influx that surpasses the cells&#x2019; biosynthetic demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">De Maeseneire et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Vemuri et al., 2006</xref>). Several studies have reported on engineered <italic>E. coli</italic> strains with a reduced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Farmer and Liao, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Lin et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De Mey, Lequeux, et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Lara et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Parimi et al., 2017</xref>) or abolished (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fuentes et al., 2013</xref>) acetate overflow during unrestricted growth. However, unrestricted growth produces a very different physiology compared to carbon limited growth. In addition, industrial strains are often designed such that the expression of the production machinery is coupled to changes in the extracellular environment or growth (reviewed in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Zhu et al., 2012</xref>)). A typical example is the use of promoters that are catabolically repressed during non-limited growth but fully expressed and only fully burdening the cell machinery in the carbon-limited production phase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Srivastava and Gupta, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Maury et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Pedersen and Papadakis, 2019</xref>). Since cells in this phase are in a very different physiological state, with a different metabolic burden, transitioning from carbon limitation to carbon excess can lead to a very different physiological reaction than what can be predicted from data acquired from cultures acclimatized to unrestricted growth. It is therefore useful to include such experiments when evaluating a strain&#x2019;s robustness.</p>
<p>This study evaluated how three different metabolic engineering strategies previously shown to reduce acetate accumulation in <italic>E. coli</italic> affected the acetate formation, biomass growth and 2&#x2019;FL production during either unrestricted growth on glucose or in a glucose-limited process exposed to glucose shock. The three strategies are described below and in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>:</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Simplified central carbon metabolism and 2&#x2019;-<italic>O</italic>-fucosyllactose (2&#x2019;FL) production pathway in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>. For the 2&#x2019;FL production, lactose is used as a sugar acceptor and GDP-fucose (sugar nucleotide) as a sugar donor. Specific glycosyltransferases, e.g., <italic>futC</italic> are then used to transfer the fucose moity from the donor to the acceptor to assemble the HMO. Gene <italic>lacZ</italic> is removed to prevent degradation of lactose and <italic>wcaJ</italic> is removed to increase the GDP-fucose pool. Genes <italic>ldhA</italic> and <italic>pflB</italic> are removed to block mixed-acid fermentation pathways. The three strategies used to reduce acetate production under aerobic conditions and selected genes for these strategies are marked in blue, green and yellow.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1339054-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Strategy 1 - Alterations of direct pathways to and from acetate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Dittrich et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Phue et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Tao, Cheng, and Kopatsis, 2012</xref>). This included the deletion of <italic>poxB</italic>&#x2014;encoding pyruvate oxidase that catalyses the direct conversion of pyruvate to acetate, deletion of <italic>pta</italic>&#x2014;encoding phosphate acetyltransferase, the first enzyme in the acetyl-CoA to acetate pathway, deletions of <italic>adhE</italic> and <italic>adhP</italic>, encoding two alcohol dehydrogenases involved in ethanol formation from acetyl-CoA and the concomitant oxidation of 2 NADH molecules. While not directly involved in acetate formation, NAD<sup>&#x2b;</sup> is needed for acetyl-CoA formation from pyruvate, which could potentially become a limiting factor under conditions when NADH oxidation via oxidative phosphorylation is a bottleneck, such as during overflow metabolism. Reduction of alternative ways to oxidize NADH could thus reduce the acetyl-CoA formation rate and thereby acetate formation. Finally, overexpression of <italic>acs</italic> encoding acetyl-CoA synthetase, a high affinity ATP driven acetate scavenging enzyme, that converts acetate into acetyl-CoA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Lin et al., 2006</xref>).</p>
<p>Strategy 2 - Mutations that channel the metabolic flux away from the acetate precursors pyruvate and acetyl-CoA and into the TCA cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">De Maeseneire et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De Mey, Lequeux, et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Zhu et al., 2019</xref>). This included overexpression of <italic>gltA</italic> encoding citrate synthase, which constitutes the main entry point into the TCA cycle, converting acetyl-CoA and oxaloacetate into citric acid, overexpression of <italic>ppc</italic> that encodes phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase that is the second entry point into the TCA cycle converting PEP and CO<sub>2</sub> into oxaloacetate and which also reduces the availability of PEP which is driving the glucose uptake via the PTS system, deletion of <italic>pckA</italic> encoding phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, catalyzing the reverse reaction from oxaloacetate into PEP, deletion of <italic>iclR</italic>, a negative regulator for the glyoxylate bypass. Deletion of <italic>iclR</italic> has been shown to increase the flux through the glyoxylate shunt and increase the overall TCA capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Waegeman et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Strategy 3 - Reducing the maximum glucose uptake rate below the threshold that triggers overflow metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cho et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">De Anda et al., 2006</xref>). This was attempted by the deletion of the enzyme IIBC components in the PTS system for glucose (encoded by <italic>ptsG</italic>) and N-acetylglucosamine (encoded by <italic>nagE</italic>), which is also able to transport glucose and contributes to growth in &#x394;<italic>ptsG</italic> genotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fuentes et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>These genetic modifications and their combinations were introduced into an industrial 2&#x2019;FL producing strain (C1) with a mixed-acid negative phenotype that prevent anaerobic metabolism due to an imposed redox imbalance (&#x394;<italic>pflB</italic>, &#x394;<italic>ldhA</italic> and &#x394;<italic>focA</italic> genotype). Together these knockouts prevent the <italic>E. coli</italic> cells from passing the pyruvate to acetyl-CoA node without concomitant NAD<sup>&#x2b;</sup> to NADH reduction, and from oxidizing any produced NADH by converting pyruvate into lactate as terminal electron acceptor. Therefore, without oxygen available as electron acceptor, these cells quickly run low on NAD<sup>&#x2b;</sup> which halts the metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Clark et al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Mat-Jan and Clark, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Lara et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Wu et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Singh, Lynch, and Gill, 2009</xref>). After an initial screening in microplates, selected strains were tested in bioreactors in a high-cell density, glucose-limited fed-batch process and challenged by a large bolus addition of glucose to trigger <italic>E. coli</italic>&#x2019;s overflow metabolism.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s2">
<title>2 Results</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Initial strain characterization in microplate experiments</title>
<p>A microplate assay was used as an initial high-throughput screening tool to narrow down the number of candidate strains before further characterization in bioreactors. The assay was designed to evaluate the impact of various modifications on both acetate formation and growth during non-limited growth and 2&#x2019;FL production during carbon-limited growth. To properly evaluate the impact on 2&#x2019;FL formation, carbon-limited growth was needed. Therefore, each strain was tested under two conditions: i) with excess glucose, where the acetate yield from overflow metabolism and their growth rates (&#xb5;max) could be estimated, and ii) with a slow and controlled release of glucose and fructose from sucrose using the enzyme sucrose hydrolase to ensure a carbon-limited environment, which is necessary to properly evaluate 2&#x2019;FL yield.</p>
<p>Among the single modifications tested (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>), only deletion of <italic>poxB</italic> (strategy 1) and overexpression of <italic>gltA</italic> and <italic>ppc</italic> (strategy 2) significantly reduced the acetate yield in the assay. Deletion of the glucose transporters <italic>ptsG</italic> and <italic>nagE</italic> (strategy 3) affected acetate levels, but the &#x394;<italic>ptsG</italic> modification severely affected the growth rate, which made it difficult to properly quantify the glucose consumption and calculate yields in the microplate assay. Surprisingly, increasing the expression level of <italic>acs</italic> did not have an impact, even though such effects has previously been reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Lin et al., 2006</xref>; Peebo et al., 2014).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Performance of strains engineered to reduce production of acetate in batch (for growth and acetate yield) and enzymatic fed-batch (for 2&#x2019;FL titers) conditions, performed in microplate experiments. The results are presented in blocks, following the three different strain design strategies: 1) Alterations to pathways to and from acetate, 2) Increasing carbon flux towards TCA cycle and 3) Reducing glucose uptake rate. The values are presented as the average of three individual cultures relative to the C1 control strain. &#x394;&#x2013;corresponds to deletion and OE&#x2013;corresponds to overexpression. &#xb1; Standard deviation. &#x2a;Results with statistical significance (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Strain ID</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Relevant genotype</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Relative values (%)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">&#xb5;max (h<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th align="center">Y<sub>acetate/glucose</sub> (g/g)</th>
<th align="center">2&#x2019;FL (g/L)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">C1</td>
<td align="center">Industrial 2&#x2019;FL producer (Control)</td>
<td align="center">100 &#xb1; 5</td>
<td align="center">100 &#xb1; 6</td>
<td align="center">100 &#xb1; 5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5" align="center">Alterations to pathways to and from acetate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">AP1</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;pta</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">76 &#xb1; 3 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">112 &#xb1; 3 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">106 &#xb1; 6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">AP2</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;poxB</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">96 &#xb1; 1</td>
<td align="center">77 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">96 &#xb1; 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">AP3</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;pta &#x394;poxB</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">75 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">20 &#xb1; 1 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">102 &#xb1; 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">AP4</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;adhE</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">100 &#xb1; 2</td>
<td align="center">99 &#xb1; 6</td>
<td align="center">101 &#xb1; 7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">AP5</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;pta &#x394;poxB &#x394;adhE</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">72 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">18 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">108 &#xb1; 6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">AP6</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;pta &#x394;poxB &#x394;adhE &#x394;adhP</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">82 &#xb1; 3 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">17 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">118 &#xb1; 8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">AP7</td>
<td align="center">C1 <sup>
<italic>OE</italic>
</sup>
<italic>adhE</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">100 &#xb1; 2</td>
<td align="center">104 &#xb1; 2</td>
<td align="center">96 &#xb1; 4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">AP8</td>
<td align="center">C1 <sup>
<italic>OE</italic>
</sup>
<italic>adhP</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">97 &#xb1; 1</td>
<td align="center">99 &#xb1; 4</td>
<td align="center">98 &#xb1; 8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">AP9</td>
<td align="center">C1 <sup>
<italic>OE</italic>
</sup>
<italic>acs</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">101 &#xb1; 5</td>
<td align="center">101 &#xb1; 4</td>
<td align="center">98 &#xb1; 6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5" align="center">Increased carbon flux towards TCA cycle</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">TCA1</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;gltA</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">2 &#xb1; 3 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">14 &#xb1; 3 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">12 &#xb1; 3 &#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">TCA2</td>
<td align="center">C1 <sup>
<italic>OE</italic>
</sup>
<italic>gltA</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">92 &#xb1; 3</td>
<td align="center">87 &#xb1; 4 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">95 &#xb1; 2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">TCA3</td>
<td align="center">C1 <sup>
<italic>OE</italic>
</sup>
<italic>ppc</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">85 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">75 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">94 &#xb1; 1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">TCA4</td>
<td align="center">C1 <sup>
<italic>OE</italic>
</sup>
<italic>gltA</italic> <sup>
<italic>OE</italic>
</sup>
<italic>ppc</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">82 &#xb1; 1 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">51 &#xb1; 1 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">93 &#xb1; 3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">TCA5</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;iclR</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">108 &#xb1; 1</td>
<td align="center">95 &#xb1; 2</td>
<td align="center">129 &#xb1; 4 &#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">TCA6</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;pckA</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">101 &#xb1; 3</td>
<td align="center">101 &#xb1; 5</td>
<td align="center">94 &#xb1; 4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">TCA7</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;pckA &#x394;iclR</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">106 &#xb1; 1</td>
<td align="center">92 &#xb1; 3</td>
<td align="center">124 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">TCA8</td>
<td align="center">C1 <sup>
<italic>OE</italic>
</sup>
<italic>gltA &#x394;iclR</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">95 &#xb1; 3</td>
<td align="center">27 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">123 &#xb1; 5 &#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">APTCA1</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;pta &#x394;iclR</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">80 &#xb1; 3 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">108 &#xb1; 1</td>
<td align="center">129 &#xb1; 6 &#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">APTCA2</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;pta &#x394;poxB &#x394;iclR</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">83 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">17 &#xb1; 2 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">130 &#xb1; 6 &#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5" align="center">Reduced glucose uptake rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">GU1</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;ptsG</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">13 &#xb1; 6 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">15 &#xb1; 1 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">86 &#xb1; 6 &#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">GU2</td>
<td align="center">C1 <italic>&#x394;ptsG &#x394;nagE</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">5 &#xb1; 1 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">13 &#xb1; 3 &#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">85 &#xb1; 13</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Estimating the acetate yields of mutants with reduced glucose uptake rates was challenging due to the slower growth and lower acetate numbers at the harvest point. Deletion of the <italic>ptsG</italic> gene (GU1) resulted in an 87% decrease in growth rate and acetate levels that were difficult to quantify after the 24-h batch experiment. The small decrease in 2&#x2019;FL titer (&#x2212;14%) was more easily determined as the experiment was performed in a 48-h fed-batch assay. Similarly, the subsequent deletion of the <italic>nagE</italic> gene (GU2) resulted in a 95% reduction in growth rate. The effect on acetate yield and 2&#x2019;FL titer was comparable to the GU1 mutant. Considering the impact on growth, it was not possible to draw any firm conclusion about GU1 and GU2 in the microplate experiment, other than the fact that the growth rate had been reduced.</p>
<p>Several combined modifications produced synergistic effects. Deletion of <italic>poxB</italic> produced a modest reduction of acetate by 23%, whereas <italic>pta</italic> deletion caused a slight increase. However, in combination, they reduced the acetate yield by 80%. Moreover, increasing the expression levels of the two entry points into the TCA, <italic>gltA</italic> and <italic>ppc</italic>, caused only a small reduction in acetate formation (&#x2212;13% and &#x2212;25%, respectively), but the combined effect of the mutations was more than additive (&#x2212;49%). Combining <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression with &#x394;<italic>iclR</italic>, which by itself had no impact on the acetate yield, had a significant impact (&#x2212;73%). Interestingly, all strains with <italic>iclR</italic> deletion had a 20%&#x2013;30% increase in 2&#x2019;FL production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Characterization of selected mutants in a bioreactor system</title>
<p>The strains that showed the lowest acetate formation without having a negative effect on 2&#x2019;FL production were selected for further study in a 250&#xa0;mL bioreactor system where dissolved oxygen (DO), pH and glucose feed rate could be controlled. A total of 6 mutants were tested and compared to the C1 control strain in at least two biological replicates. These mutants included TCA2, GU1, TCA8, TCA5, APTCA2 and AP6, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>. Despite the &#x394;<italic>ptsG</italic> strain having a moderately reduced 2&#x2019;FL titer, it was included in the fermentation experiments where the growth conditions could be better controlled. TCA2 and TCA8 were selected to evaluate the beneficial effect of the <italic>iclR</italic> deletion in combination with <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression on 2&#x2019;FL titer and lower acetate yield compared to other <italic>gltA</italic> and <italic>ppc</italic> combinations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The maximum growth rate (&#xb5;max) and acetate yield (Yas) were determined in the batch phase, and the product yield (Yps), biomass yield (Yxs) and biomass specific product yield (Ypx) were determined in the fed-batch phase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). The maximum growth rates (&#xb5;max) of the mutant strains were estimated from the development of the optical density in the batch phase until glucose depletion, which occurred at an OD<sub>600</sub> &#x3d; 30 &#xb1; 2.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of strain performance in bioreactors. Samples for maximum growth rate (&#xb5;max) and acetate yield (Yas) determination were taken at the end of the batch phase, while samples for biomass yield (Yxs) and biomass specific product yield (Ypx) were taken before the glucose pulse addition, approximately 43&#x2013;48&#xa0;h after the start of the feed phase. Separate product yields were calculated before and after the glucose pulse addition (Yps-pre and Yps-post) from the linear slope of the 2&#x2019;FL accumulation/glucose consumption. The values are relative to the control strain (C1), except for the Yps-post, which is relative to the C1 strain prior to the glucose pulse. All values are given as percentages. The fermentation with the control strain and glucose pulse addition was performed in biological triplicate (n &#x3d; 3, error bars &#x3d; standard deviation), whereas the control strain without pulse addition and the mutants were performed in biological duplicate (n &#x3d; 2, error bars &#x3d; range). Note that for some strains there were only one datapoint available for &#xb5;max (TCA8, GU1) and Yas (GU1). A statistical analysis was done comparing results from the engineered strains to C1 using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett post-test. Significance levels are indicated with &#x2a; above the columns, where &#x2a; &#x3d; <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05, &#x2a;&#x2a; &#x3d; <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.01, &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a; &#x3d; <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1339054-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The growth of all mutant strains were comparable to the control C1 strain, except the GU1 strain, which was significantly slower (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). The growth rate of GU1 was higher in the fermenter than in the microplate assay, but the relative impact compared to the control was greater than what had been reported previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fuentes et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Acetate measurements showed that the control strain produced up to 1.5&#xa0;g/L of acetate at the end of the batch phase (OD<sub>600</sub> &#x3d; 30). The highest acetate level overall was observed with the <italic>ptsG</italic> deleted GU1 strain, which accumulated up to 1.8&#xa0;g/L at the end of the batch phase (OD<sub>600</sub> &#x3d; 28). The TCA8 strain carrying the <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression and <italic>iclR</italic> deletion had the lowest accumulation of acetate (0.19&#xa0;g/L). Strains with multiple deletions such as AP6 and APTCA2, as well as strain TCA2 reached up to 0.5&#xa0;g/L of acetate. Interestingly, organic acid quantification revealed glutamate accumulation up to 3&#xa0;g/L but with a very high batch-to-batch variation (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S1</xref>).</p>
<p>In general, the 2&#x2019;FL titer development prior to the glucose pulse were found to be similar for all strains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>) and a statistical analysis on the 2&#x2019;FL yield on glucose (Yps-pre (%) in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>) did not reveal any significant difference in any mutant strain compared to the control. However, the calculated biomass yield on glucose (Yxs) was higher for some of the mutant strains. Given the variation in biomass yield, the biomass-specific 2&#x2019;FL yield (Ypx) was also compared between the strains. TCA2, TCA8, AP6 and APTCA2 all had significantly lower Ypx than C1. The largest reductions were observed for TCA8 (reduced by 12%&#x2013;15%) and for AP6 (reduced by 16%&#x2013;18%). The reduction was predominantly caused by their increased biomass levels. In combination with slightly lower meased Yps it resulted in significantly reduced Ypx.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Fed-batch fermentation development over time before and after the addition of a glucose pulse. Genotypes and marker shapes for the control and mutant strains are shown below the figure. Trendlines for fermentations with the control strain with (closed squares, dashed line) and a reference without a glucose pulse (open squares, solid line) are shown in black. The time window 43&#x2013;48&#xa0;h into the feed phase in which the glucose pulses were added is marked with dashed grey vertical lines. <bold>(A)</bold> Cell density development in the fed-batch fermentations of control and mutant strains. <bold>(B)</bold> 2&#x2019;FL concentration in the fed-batch fermentations of control and mutant strains. Values are shown relative to the highest value in the dataset of the pulsed fermentations. <bold>(C)</bold> acetic acid development in the fed-batch experiments after glucose pulse addition. Samples were collected and acetic acid was quantified before the pulse addition (t &#x3d; &#x2212;5&#xa0;min), at the time of addition (t &#x3d; 0) and at intervals until 90&#xa0;min. Mutant strain experiments were performed in duplicate (n &#x3d; 2) whereas the control strain experiment was performed in triplicate (n &#x3d; 3). <bold>(D)</bold> Biomass specific glucose consumption rate (q<sub>s</sub>) after the addition of the large glucose pulse. The q<sub>s</sub> was calculated as incremental differences between sample points. Experiments with mutants were performed in duplicate except the control strain which was in triplicate. Error bars indicate the standard deviation for the control strain and the range of the duplicates for the mutants.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1339054-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Stress testing of selected mutants</title>
<p>To test the strains&#x2019; ability to withstand a sudden glucose shock during glucose-limited growth, a single glucose bolus addition corresponding to a final concentration of 10&#xa0;g/L (55&#xa0;mM) was added 43&#x2013;48&#xa0;h into the fed-batch phase. The size of the glucose addition was chosen to pose a greater challenge than previous studies where <italic>E. coli</italic> had been exposed to glucose pulses ranging from 0.08 to 3.7&#xa0;g/L, which had triggered overflow metabolism but not destabilized the growth of the cultures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Enfors and Haggstrom, 1999</xref>; Sunya et al., 2012). In addition to a larger pulse, a higher cell density was also used (50&#xa0;g/L dry weight compared to 4&#x2013;10&#xa0;g/L dry weight). Samples were withdrawn for organic acid and glucose measurements before and after the pulse (at 0, 10, 30, 50, 70, 90 and 120&#xa0;min). Air sparging and stirring were set to the maximum before the glucose pulse additions to prevent limiting DO levels for extended periods. DO levels did still drop to 0% in some of the vessels, but only for a brief amount of time (few minutes), which meant it could not contribute significantly to the overall acetate levels based on the acetate production rates (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>).</p>
<p>In all experiments all glucose was consumed within 70&#xa0;min of the pulse and the highest biomass specific glucose consumption rates (qs) were measured between 30 and 50&#xa0;min after the pulse. (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>). The <italic>ptsG</italic> deleted GU1 had a decreased qs, whereas AP6 had the highest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3D</xref>).</p>
<p>Acetate accumulation was observed in all cultures following the glucose pulse (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3C</xref>). The two &#x394;<italic>pta</italic> &#x394;<italic>poxB</italic> strains AP6 and APTCA2 showed the lowest accumulation, reaching 0.3&#xa0;g/L after 90&#xa0;min when all the glucose had been consumed, this corresponded to only 10% of the 3&#xa0;g/L the control accumulated (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S4</xref>). The <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression strains TCA2 and TCA8 also produced less acetate than the control strain, reaching 1&#x2013;2&#xa0;g/L. On the other hand, TCA5 and GU1 accumulated close to 3&#xa0;g/L of acetate after 90&#xa0;min, which was the same as the control strain C1. Glutamate only accumulated when using one strain&#x2014;the <italic>gltA</italic> overexpressing strain TCA2, which reached 1&#x2013;1.25&#xa0;g/L when measured 90&#xa0;min after the glucose pulse (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S3</xref>). No glutamate production was observed in the strain combining deletion of <italic>iclR</italic> with <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression (TCA8) indicating that deletion of <italic>iclR</italic> can counteract glutamate accumulation caused by <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression.</p>
<p>Following the addition of the glucose pulse, all strains produced organic acids (acetate), resulting in an intermittent pH drop (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Many of the strains were able to re-assimilate the produced acids, but the control strain and mutant strains that accumulated high levels of acetate were later unable to restore growth or production of 2&#x2019;FL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). This was also evident from the pH profiles as pH in this experiment was only controlled by base titration. The acidifying effect of any organic acids produced were thus neutralized by base addition, but in the cases the acids were re-consumed it could not be compensated by acid titration. This could be seen as a substantial raise in pH (in some cases to almost pH 8) in the cultivations that survived the glucose pulse (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). Based on these pH profiles, it was evident that TCA2, TCA8, APTCA2 and AP6 re-consumed the produced acids. On the other hand, no pH peak was seen in the fermentations of TCA5 and GU1 or the control strains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>), indicating that accumulated acids were not being re-consumed. Moreover, the biomass development and 2&#x2019;FL production showed that TCA5 and GU1 stopped growing and producing 2&#x2019;FL after the addition of the glucose pulse (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref>). The control strain C1 was also severely affected, whereas strains TCA2, TCA8, APTCA2 and AP6 were all able to survive, continue to grow and produce 2&#x2019;FL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">B</xref>) with high yield.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Online measurements from fed-batch fermentations showing pH values before and after a glucose bolus addition. Each graph shows the results from duplicate fermentations. The period with rising pH indicates the window where acids generated from the pulse were re-consumed (marked with arrows in the two examples).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-12-1339054-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s3">
<title>3 Discussion</title>
<p>The tendency of <italic>E. coli</italic> to revert to overflow metabolism has long been a challenge for biotechnological applications and it has therefore remained an attractive target for metabolic engineering (reviewed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Eiteman and Altman, 2006</xref>; De Mey; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">De Maeseneire et al., 2006</xref>) Many strategies have been proposed and implemented, but with the focus on the effect during prolonged batch growth. Here we compare the effect of three distinct approaches and some combinations thereof in a commercial production strain: 1) alterations to acetate pathways, 2) increased flux towards the TCA cycle, and 3) reduced glucose uptake rate. The strain used for the study redirects a large proportion of the glucose carbon source towards 2&#x2019;FL production, which exhorts an additional metabolic load adding to the overall stress level, something not typically taken into account in the published studies. In addition to batch growth, we also show the effect of the genetic modifications when transitioning from carbon limited to unrestricted growth, something hitherto unreported. This is especially relevant in industrial fed-batch and continuous fermentations which are utilizing carbon limitation but are exposed to local sugar gradients at the feed inlet zones or could be exposed to sudden increases in sugar concentration due to constraints in the manufacturing setup (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Larsson et al., 1996</xref>).</p>
<p>To ensure that the genetic modifications did not compromise the general performance of the strains, we first screened them in a microtiter plate assay. The only strains that showed a significant decrease in 2&#x2019;FL production were the ones with the <italic>ptsG</italic> deletion (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The <italic>iclR</italic> deletion strains, on the other hand, exhibited an enhanced 2&#x2019;FL yield. However, these results were not confirmed in subsequent fed-batch fermentations with selected strains under glucose-limited conditions. Neither the <italic>ptsG</italic> nor the <italic>iclR</italic> deletion had any measurable effect on growth or 2&#x2019;FL yield in the bioreactors under controlled fermentation conditions. We attribute the discrepancy between the microtiter plate and the bioreactor experiments to two factors: the inoculation ratio and the pH control. The strains carrying the <italic>ptsG</italic> deletion had a lower initial biomass in the microtiter plate assay due to their reduced growth rate in the previous step and the lack of OD<sub>600</sub> normalization in the inoculation step. This could have influenced the outcome of the assay. The <italic>iclR</italic> deletion strains on the other hand might have been less impacted by the lack of pH control in the microtiter plate assay compared to the other strains. While the strains mixed-acid negative phenotype is very effective during anaerobic conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Clark et al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Mat-Jan and Clark, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Singh, Lynch, and Gill, 2009</xref>), we have observed that acid formation occur under microaerobic conditions, probably due to restoration of some of the redox imbalance via respiration while still maintaining a fermentative metabolism. The microtiter experiments turn microaerobic over time and due to the lack of a pH controller system the broth therefore acidify over time. This eventually leads to growth inhibition and cessation of product formation. The <italic>iclR</italic> deletion mutants all showed reduced glutamate accumulation during the glucose stress test (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S3</xref>). If the deletion also affected acid formation in the microplate assay it could have delayed the acidification of the medium and thereby prolonged the productive phase and increased the 2&#x2019;FL titer.</p>
<p>In contrast to the fed-batch test, the batch tests produced marked differences in both growth rate and acetate yield for some of the genetic modifications. This was seen in both the microtiter assay and the bioreactors. There were two combinations with especially noteworthy synergistic effects. The first was the combined disruption of <italic>pta</italic> and <italic>poxB</italic>. In the microtiter experiment, the disruption of the acetate pathway from acetyl-CoA by <italic>pta</italic> deletion reduced the growth rate and led to an increase in acetate formation (&#x2b;12%), while the disruption of the acetate pathway from pyruvate via <italic>poxB</italic> deletion only resulted in a minor reduction in acetate accumulation (&#x2212;23%). However, together they had a marked synergistic effect and produced a five-fold reduction (&#x2212;80%). The second was the combination of <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression and <italic>iclR</italic> deletion. Overexpression of the <italic>gltA</italic> gene has previously been shown to effectively eliminate acetate production by intensifying the flux through the TCA cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">De Maeseneire et al., 2006</xref>) and to increase anaplerotic reactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Im et al., 2020</xref>). Although <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression did not reduce acetate to such an extent in our experiments (&#x2212;13% and &#x2212;44% in microplate assay and bioreactor, respectively), its overexpression together with the increased uptake capacity in the TCA cycle with the <italic>iclR</italic> deletion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Waegeman et al., 2011</xref>), which by itself had a negligible effect, produced the overall biggest reduction in acetate accumulation of any strain in the bioreactor batch phase (&#x2212;80%). In contrast, the combination of the <italic>iclR</italic> deletion with the <italic>pta</italic> and <italic>poxB</italic> deletions did not produce a significant difference. The effect of &#x394;<italic>iclR</italic> indicated that the capacity of the TCA cycle had become a bottleneck when the entry point (<italic>gltA</italic>) was overexpressed. By creating a shortcut in the glyoxylate shunt, this limitation was relieved and the overall capacity from acetyl-CoA to isocitrate increased and more flux was channelled away from acetate formation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The underlying reason could either be a direct rate limitation in one of the enzymatic steps in the TCA cycle, or a limitation in respiration and its ability to oxidize NADH/FADH<sub>2</sub>, a demand that is lessened if the glyoxylate shunt is increased as fewer NADH equivalents are produced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Waegeman et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>The glucose pulse addition experiment constituted a stress test with a direct transition from glucose limited growth with its characteristic physiology to unrestricted growth - without any adaptation time. Although none of the modifications eliminated overflow metabolism from the freely available glucose, strains with specific genetic modifications accumulated much less acetate and showed an increased robustness. The reduced acetate formation rate in these strains seems to have prevented the accumulation from reaching a critical level, which would otherwise cause a viscous cycle of ever-increasing acetate production and growth inhibition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Millard et al., 2021</xref>). In contrast, cultures lacking these modifications kept accumulating acetate until they ceased to grow and produce (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Furthermore, all strains that survived the glucose pulse showed an increase in pH, indicating the reassimilation of the accumulated acetate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). These findings reflect a previous study that demonstrated that engineered <italic>E. coli</italic> strains with a reduced acetate phenotype can reduce fermentation failures caused by acetate accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Chong et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Interestingly, in the bioreactor batch experiment the TCA8 strain with <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression and <italic>iclR</italic> deletion accumulated significantly less acetate than the &#x394;<italic>pta</italic> &#x394;<italic>poxB</italic> strains AP6 and APTCA2. This relation completely shifted in the pulse experiment where the AP6 and APTCA2 strains accumulated much less acetate than TCA8. This discrepancy shows the importance of considering the prior physiological state when trying to predict a reaction to a particular change. In this case, it meant that learnings of how particular genetic modifications affected acetate formation during unrestricted growth in the batch phase could not be directly applied to the response to a glucose pulse in a fed-batch phase - even if the pulse led to unrestricted growth. When cells are exposed to such a sudden change, they do not have time to adapt, and therefore their previous physiological state will influence how they react (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Vasilakou et al., 2020</xref>). The difference in physiology in carbon-limited versus unrestricted growth carried over and made the cultures react differently than what would be expected from the batch experiments alone.</p>
<p>Inactivation of the glucose component of PTS by deletion of <italic>ptsG</italic> to reduce the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)-dependent glucose transport rate was expected to be a very efficient way to reduce acetate overflow metabolism based on previous reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Sig&#xfc;enza et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De Mey, De Maeseneire, et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Lara et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fuentes et al., 2013</xref>). <italic>E. coli</italic> is known to possess several alternative transporters for glucose uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Boos and Howard, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Hua et al., 2004</xref>), including alternative PTS system for mannose (encoded by <italic>manXYZ</italic>) and GlcNAc (encoded by <italic>nagE</italic>) that can take up glucose at a reduced rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fuentes et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Crigler et al., 2018</xref>), as well as non-PTS systems such as galactose permease (encoded by <italic>galP</italic>), galactose ABC transporter (encoded by <italic>mglBAC</italic>) or maltose ABC transporter (encoded by <italic>malEFG</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Boos and Howard, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Hua et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fuentes et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Crigler et al., 2018</xref>). Since these alternative transporters operate at a lower rate, they should avoid overloading the TCA cycle or respiratory capacity and thereby prevent, or at least reduce, the accumulation of acetate from overflow metabolism. Surprisingly, the deletion of <italic>ptsG</italic> did not reduce the acetate yield in the microplate experiment or during batch growth in the bioreactor, and it did not reduce acetate and prevent culture failure during the stress test with the glucose pulse. A lower glucose consumption rate was observed in the mutant, indicating a reduced glycolytic flux and a successful knockout. In theory, this should have resulted in a low acetate overflow phenotype since the TCA cycle and the respiratory capacity had not been changed. This outcome, which is both counterintuitive and different compared to previous studies, is not straightforward to explain. A full genome sequencing could reveal if there were any unintended changes that was introduced during the genetic engineering work, but this was outside the scope of the work.</p>
<p>An alternative strategy to further reduce the flow to pyruvate (and, therefore, acetate) could be to completely knockout the PTS system and overexpress an alternative glucose transporter such as galactose permease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">De Anda et al., 2006</xref>) or the maltose ABC transporter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Carre&#xf3;n-Rodr&#xed;guez et al., 2023</xref>). In addition to slowing down the glucose uptake rate, non-PTS sugar transporters avoid the conversion of PEP to pyruvate during glucose transport (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">De Anda et al., 2006</xref>), which is a precursor for acetate. Such an approach was able to restore growth while maintaining reduced acetate secretion when <italic>galP</italic> was overexpressed in a <italic>ptsG</italic> mutant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">De Anda et al., 2006</xref>). Though, it remains to be seen if such a strategy would be successful with an industrial 2&#x2019;FL producing strain.</p>
<p>A recent study showed that overflow metabolism confers a competitive advantage over complete respiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Rabbers et al., 2022</xref>) suggesting an evolutionary role for acetate cycling. Complete elimination of acetate formation may therefore inherently result in trade-offs, such as slower growth, the accumulation of other by-products, or sensitivity to other process conditions that only a very extensive rewiring of the <italic>E. coli</italic> metabolism might be able to solve.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s4">
<title>4 Conclusion</title>
<p>The findings herein show that blocking the major acetate pathways and increasing the flux towards the TCA cycle can contribute to a reduced acetate phenotype for both regular batch cultures and for glucose limited cultures transitioning to non-limited growth. The genetic modifications were shown to enhance cell robustness, enabling an industrial strain to better tolerate processes exposed to dramatic changes in glucose concentration. The best performers in terms of 2&#x2019;FL yield after a glucose shock were the strains that overexpressed <italic>gltA</italic>, and the ones carrying the combined <italic>pta</italic>, <italic>poxB</italic> deletions. The <italic>iclR</italic> deletion, while not effective on its own, reduced acetate formation when combined with <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression, and it counteracted the tendency of glutamate accumulation caused by the <italic>gltA</italic> overexpression. Future work for the development of glucose gradient resistant production strains could explore these two strategies, as well as the combination of them (&#x394;<italic>pta</italic> &#x394;<italic>poxB</italic> with OE<italic>gltA</italic> and &#x394;<italic>iclR</italic>). It is also recommended to follow up with a study of the impact of repeated stress, such as in a pulse-fed scale-down reactor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Vasilakou et al., 2020</xref>), as this could have a different effect on the physiology and possibly differentiate the performance of the strains. Finally, as an attempt to understand why the <italic>ptsG</italic> deletion was not effective in reducing acetate formation in this work, a comparison of the metabolic and transcriptomic expression profiles of a <italic>&#x394;ptsG</italic> strain with a low acetate phenotype as reported in previous studies would be interesting.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s5">
<title>5 Methods and materials</title>
<sec id="s5-1">
<title>5.1 Bacterial strains</title>
<p>The background strain used for the construction of reduced-acetate phenotype mutants was derived from <italic>E</italic>. <italic>coli</italic> K-12 DH1 with the genotype: F&#x2c9;, &#x28e;-, gyrA96, recA1, relA1, endA1, thi-1, hsdR17, supE44. This strain was further modified to generate the 2&#x2019;FL producing C1 strain. The modifications included deletion of <italic>lacZ</italic>, <italic>lacA</italic>, <italic>wcaJ</italic>, <italic>mdoH</italic>, overexpression of one additional chromosomally integrated copy of the colonic acid operon <italic>gmd-fcl-gmm-wcaI-manC-manB</italic> under the control of the synthetic expression element PglpF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Pedersen and Papadakis, 2019</xref>) and overexpression of two chromosomally integrated copies of alpha-1,2-fucosyltransferase (encoded by <italic>futC</italic>) from <italic>Helicobacter pylori</italic> 26,695 (homologous to NCBI Accession nr. WP_080473865.1), also under the control of PglpF. Furthermore, the strain was modified with deletion of <italic>pflB</italic>, <italic>ldhA</italic> and <italic>focA</italic> genes to block mixed-acid fermentation pathways under anaerobic conditions. All strains used in the present study are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. The gene deletions were carried out in two steps. Firstly, the gene of interest was replaced by the genetic cassette CP6-galK. The <italic>galK</italic> gene, controlled by the CP6 promoter, was amplified from the pT7-CP6-galK plasmid (Richter 2014) using primers O982 and O983 (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S2</xref>). A double stranded DNA fragment covering CP6-<italic>galK</italic> with flanking regions homologous to the DNA sequences located upstream and downstream of the gene of interest (required for homologous recombination) was constructed by PCR. The amplified CP6-<italic>galK</italic> DNA, flanked by the homologous DNA sequence upstream and downstream of the gene of interest, was used for double strand recombineering. This was done as described elsewhere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Datsenko and Wanner, 2000</xref>) using helper plasmid pACBSR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Herring, Glasner, and Blattner, 2003</xref>). In the second recombineering step, CP6-<italic>galK</italic> was removed using single-stranded DNA recombineering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Sawitzke et al., 2013</xref>) (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S2</xref>) and the helper plasmid pACBSR. Strain selection was performed as described elsewhere (Warming et al., 2005). Gene deletions covered the entire coding sequence of the gene, including translational start codon and stop codon. Gene overexpression&#x2019;s were achieved by replacing native gene promoters with synthetic expression elements such as PglpF, PglpF_SD7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Pedersen and Papadakis, 2019</xref>) or Pcon3_70UTR. The replacement of native promoter sequences upstream of genes was performed in two steps, as described above. The promoter sequences (PglpF, PglpF_SD7 and Pcon3_70UTR) inserted upstream of the genes are listed in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S2</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-2">
<title>5.2 Microplate assays</title>
<p>Microplate experiments were used for initial screening of growth, acetate and 2&#x2019;FL production. Basal minimum medium (BMM) was prepared by autoclaving 7&#xa0;g/L KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 7&#xa0;g/L NH<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 2.5&#xa0;g/L KOH, 1&#xa0;g/L NaOH, 0.5&#xa0;g/L citric acid, and trace metal solution. The pH was adjusted to pH 7.0 or pH 7.5 with 5N NaOH. The precultures were grown in 96 well plates (Axygen 2&#xa0;mL&#xa0;PP square well) containing BMM medium (pH 7.0) supplemented with 25&#xa0;g/L glucose, 1&#xa0;g/L MgSO<sub>4</sub> and 4&#xa0;mg/L thiamine. The plates were sealed with a hydrophobic gas-permeable adhesive seal (Axygen) and incubated at 34&#xb0;C, 1,000&#xa0;rpm, overnight. For growth characterization, overnight precultures were transferred into microplates containing 200&#xa0;&#x3bc;L BMM medium (pH 7.5) with 4&#xa0;mg/L thiamine, 1&#xa0;g/L MgSO<sub>4</sub> and 25&#xa0;g/L glucose. The plates were sealed and incubated at 30&#xb0;C, 840&#xa0;rpm for 24&#xa0;h in a Varioskan&#x2122; (Thermo Fisher). Absorbance was measured every 30&#xa0;min at 600&#xa0;nm. For characterization of 2&#x2019;FL production, the overnight precultures were transferred into microplates containing 750&#xa0;&#x3bc;L BMM medium (pH 7.5) with 50&#xa0;g/L lactose monohydrate, 37.5&#xa0;g/L sucrose, 1&#xa0;g/L MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 0.1&#xa0;g/L glucose, 2.5&#xa0;mL/L of 0.1&#xa0;g/L sucrose hydrolase (SUH) stock solution (300&#xa0;U/mg invertase from baker&#x2019;s yeast, Cat. Nr. I4504 Sigma-Aldrich.) and 4&#xa0;mg/L thiamine. The microplates were then sealed and incubated at 30&#xb0;C, 1,000&#xa0;rpm for 48&#xa0;h. For characterization of acetate production, overnight precultures were transferred into microplates containing 750&#xa0;&#x3bc;L BMM medium (pH 7.5) with 25&#xa0;g/L glucose, 1&#xa0;g/L MgSO<sub>4</sub> and 4&#xa0;mg/L thiamine. The plates were sealed and incubated at 30&#xb0;C, 1,000&#xa0;rpm for 24&#xa0;h. For analysis of acetate and 2&#x2019;FL, the plates were lysed by boiling at 100&#xb0;C in a shaking incubator at 800&#xa0;rpm for 1&#xa0;h followed by incubation at room temperature for 20&#xa0;min. The boiled and cooled samples were harvested by centrifugation at 4&#xb0;C, 4,700&#xa0;g for 10&#xa0;min and stored at &#x2212;20&#xb0;C until further analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-3">
<title>5.3 Bioreactor cultivations</title>
<p>Precultures for fermentations were grown in two steps. Firstly, strains from glycerol stocks were inoculated into 10&#xa0;mL glucose minimal medium (GMM) in 50&#xa0;mL Falcon tubes. The GMM medium was prepared by autoclaving 10&#xa0;g/L NH<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 5&#xa0;g/L KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 5&#xa0;g/L K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, 2.35&#xa0;g/L NaOH, 1.65&#xa0;g/L KOH, 1&#xa0;g/L citric acid and trace metals and supplementing with sterile 10&#xa0;g/L glucose, 1&#xa0;g/L MgSO<sub>4</sub> and 4&#xa0;mg/L thiamine. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.0 with 5N NaOH. The cultures were incubated overnight in a shake-incubator at 33&#xb0;C, 200&#xa0;rpm. Aliquots of the cultures were then transferred into 50&#xa0;mL of fresh GMM medium in 250&#xa0;mL baffled shake-flasks to a final OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.3&#x2013;0.5. The shake-flasks cultures very subsequently grown at 33&#xb0;C, 200&#xa0;rpm to an OD<sub>600</sub> of 2&#x2013;3.5. These cultures were then used to inoculate the fermenters at an inoculation ratio of 2%. High cell density, glucose-limited, fed-batch fermentations were carried out in 250&#xa0;mL DASbox<sup>&#xae;</sup> Mini Bioreactor System (Eppendorf) equipped with Hamilton pH and pO<sub>2</sub> probes, starting with an initial volume of 100&#xa0;mL. The fermentation medium composed of batch sterilized 5&#xa0;g/L NH<sub>4</sub>H<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 5&#xa0;g/L KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 5&#xa0;g/L K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, 0.65&#xa0;g/L NaOH, 1.65&#xa0;g/L KOH, 0.5&#xa0;g/L citric acid, 200&#xa0;mg/L antifoam 204 (Sigma), trace metals, and sterilized separately, 25&#xa0;g/L glucose, lactose, 1.2&#xa0;g/L MgSO<sub>4</sub>, and 8&#xa0;mg/L thiamine. The dissolved oxygen (DO) was kept at 23% by an agitation (700&#x2013;2000&#xa0;rpm) and airflow (1 VVM (L/L/min) cascade. The pH level was maintained at 6.8 by titration with 14% NH<sub>4</sub>OH. All cultures were started with an initial batch phase at 33&#xb0;C, but the temperature was then lowered to 30&#xb0;C 3&#xa0;h after feed start using a 1-h ramp. The feed was triggered by an increase in pH, which appeared when all the initial glucose had been consumed. The feed solution composed of glucose, lactose MgSO<sub>4</sub>, citric acid, trace mineral solution and antifoam 204 and was fed at a constant rate corresponding to 0.437&#xa0;g glucose/h. Samples were withdrawn regularly from the fermentation broth for 2&#x2019;FL, lactose, bio-wet mass (BWM) and OD (600&#xa0;nm) off-line measurements.</p>
<sec id="s5-3-1">
<title>5.3.1 Stress test with glucose pulse</title>
<p>The stress test composed of a glucose pulse that was added to the bioreactors approximately 43&#x2013;48&#xa0;h after the feed start by a fast injection of a sterile 50% glucose solution to obtain 10&#xa0;g/L glucose concentration in the fermenters. Samples for organic acids and glucose were withdrawn using a syringe and the cells were immediately removed by filtration through a sterile syringe filter (0.45&#xb5;m, 33&#xa0;mm &#xf8;). Samples were taken before the pulse, right after the pulse and further at 10, 30, 50, 70 and 90&#xa0;min after the pulse.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-4">
<title>5.4 Analytical methods</title>
<sec id="s5-4-1">
<title>5.4.1 2&#x2019;FL and glucose measurements</title>
<p>Fermentation broth samples for quantification of 2&#x2019;FL and glucose concentrations were immediately spun down by centrifugation at 13,300&#xa0;g for 3&#xa0;min at room temperature. The supernatants were analysed with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS, Supelco TSKgel Amide-80 HPLC column). The solvent was isocratic with 68% acetonitrile and 32% water.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-4-2">
<title>5.4.2 Acetate quantification from microplate experiments</title>
<p>Acetate concentrations were measured from the supernatant using an acetic acid assay kit (Megazyme), following the protocol of the manufacturer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-4-3">
<title>5.4.3 Organic acid measurement from bioreactor experiments</title>
<p>Organic acids were quantified by NMR at DSM Science and Innovation, Biodata and Translation, Center for Analytical Innovation (Delft, Netherlands). For the quantification of acetate, pyruvate, citrate, fumarate, succinate and glutamate, 70&#xa0;&#xb5;L of supernatants were homogenized with 100&#xa0;&#x3bc;L internal standard solution (adjusted to pH 7.0 with NaOH in deionized water) containing 2&#xa0;g/L of difluoro-trimethylsilanylmethyl-phosphonic acid. The samples were dried using a stream of nitrogen and subsequently dissolved in 650&#xa0;&#xb5;L deuterium oxide (D<sub>2</sub>O).</p>
<p>1D 1H NMR spectra of the clear solutions were recorded on a Avance III HD spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin AG, F&#xe4;llanden, Switzerland), operating at a proton frequency of 600&#xa0;MHz, equipped with a cryo probe, using pulse program ZGPR with a solvent suppression power level corresponding to 5&#xa0;Hz at a temperature of 293K, excitation pulse of 7.9&#xa0;&#x3bc;s, an acquisition time of 2.3&#xa0;s and a relaxation delay of 30&#xa0;s. The number of scans was set at 8, dummy scans were not used.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5-5">
<title>5.5 Statistical analyses</title>
<p>The significance of the microplate experiment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>) was evaluated using a two-tailed, unpaired <italic>t</italic>-test with a significance level of <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05, comparing the performance of the engineered strains to C1.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis of key performance indicators of the bioreactor cultivations pre- and post-glucose pulse was performed with GraphPad Prism 9.1.0. using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett post-test.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>GG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Software, Visualization, Writing&#x2013;original draft, Writing&#x2013;review and editing. RL: Conceptualization, Investigation, Visualization, Writing&#x2013;original draft. MP: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing&#x2013;review and editing. MK: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing&#x2013;review and editing. TJ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Visualization, Writing&#x2013;original draft, Writing&#x2013;review and editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by dsm-firmenich and the Innovation Fund Denmark, grant numbers (8053-00209B) and (1044-00049B).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We thank our colleagues at dsm-firmenich in H&#x00F8;rsholm and Delft for helping with analytical support, Mette Skinderso for helping with statistical analyses, and Marianne Rudolph-Hansen and Peter Becker for critically reading and giving feedback on the manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>Authors GG, RL, and TJ were employed by dsm-firmenich. Author MP was employed by DTU.</p>
<p>The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1339054/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1339054/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet4.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.docx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet3.docx" id="SM3" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.docx" id="SM4" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet2.docx" id="SM5" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM6" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ammann</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source>Achieving the impossible: Jennewein Biotechnologie is dedicated to the production of human milk oligosaccharides</source>. <publisher-loc>Essen, Germany</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>European Dairy Magazine</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Andersen</surname>
<given-names>K. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>von Meyenburg</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Are growth rates of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> in batch cultures limited by respiration?</article-title> <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>144</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.144.1.114-123.1980</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Basan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hui</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Okano</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williamson</surname>
<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Overflow metabolism in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> results from efficient proteome allocation</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>528</volume> (<issue>7580</issue>), <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature15765</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bode</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Human milk oligosaccharides: every baby needs a sugar mama</article-title>. <source>Glycobiology</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1162</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/glycob/cws074</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Boos</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Howard</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Maltose/maltodextrin system of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: transport, metabolism, and regulation</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.</source> <volume>62</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>204</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>229</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MMBR.62.1.204-229.1998</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bych</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanna Mik&#x161;</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johanson</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hederos</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vigsn&#xe6;s</surname>
<given-names>L. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Becker</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Production of HMOs using microbial hosts &#x2014; from cell engineering to large scale production</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>130</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.copbio.2018.11.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Carre&#xf3;n-Rodr&#xed;guez</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ofelia</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gosset</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Escalante</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolivar</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Glucose transport in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: from basics to transport engineering</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1588</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11061588</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yap</surname>
<given-names>W. M. G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Postma</surname>
<given-names>P. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bailey</surname>
<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Comparative studies of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> strains using different glucose uptake systems: metabolism and energetics</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Bioeng.</source> <volume>56</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>583</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>590</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19971205)56:5&#x3c;583::AID-BIT12&#x3e;3.0.CO;2-D</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cho</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shin</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname>
<given-names>G. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>High-level recombinant protein production by overexpression of <italic>mlc</italic> in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>119</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.03.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chrapkova</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Becker</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johanson</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jansen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <source>Fermentation system, feed controller, and related methods</source>. <comment>Patent WO 2023/083974</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chong</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yeow</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Improving acetate tolerance of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> by rewiring Its global regulator cAMP Receptor Protein (CRP)</article-title> <source>PLOS ONE</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>10</issue>). <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0077422</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>The fermentation pathways of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</source> <volume>63</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>234</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb03398.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cunningham</surname>
<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reams</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mat-Jan</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohammedkhani</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Mutants of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> defective in acid Fermentation</article-title>. <source>Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>1&#x2013;3</issue>), <fpage>163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>173</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02779155</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Crigler</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bannerman-Akwei</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cole</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eiteman</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Altman.</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Glucose can be transported and utilized in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> by an altered or overproduced N-acetylglucosamine phosphotransferase system (PTS)</article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source> <volume>164</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.000596</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Datsenko</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wanner.</surname>
<given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K-12 using PCR products</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>97</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>6640</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6645</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.120163297</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Anda</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ram&#xf3;n</surname>
<given-names>A. R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hern&#xe1;ndez</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hern&#xe1;ndez-Montalvo</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gosset</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bol&#xed;var</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Replacement of the glucose phosphotransferase transport system by galactose permease reduces acetate accumulation and improves process performance of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> for recombinant protein production without impairment of growth rate</article-title>. <source>Metab. Eng.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>290</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymben.2006.01.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Mey</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marjan</surname>
<given-names>G. J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beauprez</surname>
<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maertens</surname>
<given-names>Jo</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Horen</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soetaert</surname>
<given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Comparison of different strategies to reduce acetate formation in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Prog.</source> <volume>0</volume>, <fpage>0</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bp070170g</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Maeseneire</surname>
<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Mey</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandedrinck</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandamme</surname>
<given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Metabolic characterisation of <italic>E. coli</italic> citrate Synthase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase mutants in aerobic cultures</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Lett.</source> <volume>28</volume> (<issue>23</issue>), <fpage>1945</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1953</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10529-006-9182-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Mey</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maeseneire</surname>
<given-names>S.D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soetaert</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandamme</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Minimizing acetate formation in <italic>E. coli</italic> fermentations</article-title>. <source>J. Industrial Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>689</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>700</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10295-007-0244-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dinleyici</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jana</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ener Cagri</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandenplas</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Functional effects of human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs)</article-title>. <source>Gut Microbes</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>2186115</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19490976.2023.2186115</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dittrich</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vadali</surname>
<given-names>R. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname>
<given-names>G. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ka-Yiu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Redistribution of metabolic fluxes in the central aerobic metabolic pathway of <italic>E. coli</italic> mutant strains with deletion of the <italic>ackA-pta</italic> and <italic>poxB</italic> pathways for the synthesis of isoamyl acetate</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Prog.</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>627</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>631</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bp049730r</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eiteman</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Altman</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Overcoming acetate in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> recombinant protein fermentations</article-title>. <source>Trends Biotechnol. Nov.</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>530</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>536</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.09.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Enfors</surname>
<given-names>S.-O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>H&#xe4;ggstr&#xf6;m</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <source>Bioprocess technology fundamentals and applications</source>. <publisher-loc>Stockholm</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Royal Institute of Technology</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Enfors</surname>
<given-names>S. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jahic</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rozkov</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hecker</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xfc;rgen</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Physiological responses to mixing in large scale bioreactors</article-title>. <source>J. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>85</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>185</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00365-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farmer</surname>
<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Reduction of aerobic acetate production by <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>63</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>3205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3210</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.63.8.3205-3210.1997</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>F&#xf6;rster</surname>
<given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gescher.</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Metabolic engineering of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> for production of mixed-acid fermentation end products</article-title>. <source>Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>16</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2014.00016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fuentes</surname>
<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lara</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ram&#xed;rez</surname>
<given-names>O. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bol&#xed;var</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Modification of glucose import capacity in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: physiologic consequences and utility for improving DNA vaccine production</article-title>. <source>Microb. Cell Factories</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>42</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1475-2859-12-42</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Herring</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glasner</surname>
<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blattner</surname>
<given-names>F. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Gene replacement without selection: regulated suppression of amber mutations in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Gene</source> <volume>311</volume>, <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-1119(03)00585-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hill</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>May Chow</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buck</surname>
<given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Multifunctional benefits of prevalent HMOs: implications for infant health</article-title>. <source>Nutrients</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>3364</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu13103364</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hua</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oshima</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mori</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimizu</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Analysis of gene expression in <italic>Escherichia coli in</italic> response to changes of growth-limiting nutrient in chemostat cultures</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>70</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>2354</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2366</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.70.4.2354-2366.2004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Im</surname>
<given-names>D.-K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sung</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oh</surname>
<given-names>M.-K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Metabolic flux analysis of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>: engineered for gamma&#x2010;aminobutyrate production</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>900346</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/biot.201900346</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Krause</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neubauer</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neubauer</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The fed-batch principle for the molecular biology lab: controlled nutrient diets in ready-made media improve production of recombinant proteins in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Microb. Cell Factories</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>110</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12934-016-0513-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lara</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caspeta</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gosset</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bol&#xed;var</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ram&#xed;rez</surname>
<given-names>O. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Utility of an <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> strain engineered in the substrate uptake system for improved culture performance at high glucose and cell concentrations: an alternative to fed-batch cultures</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Bioeng.</source> <volume>99</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>893</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>901</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bit.21664</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lara</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vazquez-Lim&#xf3;n</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gosset</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bol&#xed;var</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xf3;pez-Mungu&#xed;a</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ram&#xed;rez</surname>
<given-names>O. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Engineering <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> to improve culture performance and reduce formation of by-products during recombinant protein production under transient intermittent anaerobic conditions</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Bioeng.</source> <volume>94</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1175</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bit.20954</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Larsson</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tornkvist</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stahl Wernersson</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tragardh</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noorman</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Enfors</surname>
<given-names>S. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Substrate gradients in bioreactors: origin and consequences</article-title>. <source>Bioprocess Eng.</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>289</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00369471</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nees</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bettenbrock</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rinas</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Is energy excess the initial trigger of carbon overflow metabolism? Transcriptional network response of carbon-limited <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> to transient carbon excess</article-title>. <source>Microb. Cell Factories</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>67</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12934-022-01787-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of acetate metabolism modulation on 2&#x2019;-fucosyllactose production in engineered <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>425</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>436</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/13102818.2021.1885996</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castro</surname>
<given-names>N. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname>
<given-names>G. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ka-Yiu San</surname>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Acetyl-CoA synthetase overexpression in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> demonstrates more efficient acetate assimilation and lower acetate accumulation: a potential tool in metabolic engineering</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>71</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>870</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>874</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-005-0230-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosleh</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abbaspourrad</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Engineered microbial routes for human milk oligosaccharides synthesis</article-title>. <source>ACS Synth. Biol.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>923</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>938</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acssynbio.1c00063</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mat-Jan</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alam</surname>
<given-names>K. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Mutants of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> deficient in the fermentative lactate dehydrogenase</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>171</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>342</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/jb.171.1.342-348.1989</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maury</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kannan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jensen</surname>
<given-names>N. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xd6;berg</surname>
<given-names>F. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kildegaard</surname>
<given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Glucose-dependent promoters for dynamic regulation of metabolic pathways</article-title>. <source>Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2018.00063</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Millard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Enjalbert</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uttenweiler-Joseph</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Portais</surname>
<given-names>J.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xe9;tisse</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Control and regulation of acetate overflow in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Elife</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>e63661</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.63661</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parimi</surname>
<given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Durie</surname>
<given-names>I. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>AfaqNiyas</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eiteman</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Eliminating acetate formation improves citramalate production by metabolically engineered <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Microb. Cell Factories</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>114</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12934-017-0729-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pedersen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Papadakis</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Nucleic acid construct for <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> gene expression</source>. <comment>Patent WO 2019/123324</comment>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Escalante</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alatorre-Santamar&#xed;a</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casta&#xf1;eda-Ovando</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salazar-Pereda</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bautista-&#xc1;vila</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cruz-Guerrero</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Human milk oligosaccharides as bioactive compounds in infant formula: recent advances and trends in synthetic methods</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.</source> <volume>62</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>214</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408398.2020.1813683</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Phue</surname>
<given-names>J.-N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaufman</surname>
<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Negrete</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joseph</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Acetate accumulation through alternative metabolic pathways in <italic>ackA</italic> &#x2212; <italic>pta</italic> &#x2212; <italic>poxB</italic> &#x2212; triple mutant in <italic>E. coli</italic> B (BL21)</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Lett.</source> <volume>32</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1897</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1903</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10529-010-0369-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pinhal</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ropers</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geiselmann</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hidde de Jong</surname>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Acetate metabolism and the inhibition of bacterial growth by acetate</article-title>. <source>J. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>201</volume> (<issue>13</issue>), <fpage>e00147-19</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/JB.00147-19</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rabbers</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gottstein</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feist</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bas</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruggeman</surname>
<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bachmann</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Selection for cell yield does not reduce overflow metabolism in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>39</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>msab345</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msab345</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roe</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Byrne</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McLaggan</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Booth</surname>
<given-names>I. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Inhibition of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> growth by acetic acid: a problem with methionine biosynthesis and homocysteine toxicity</article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source> <volume>148</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>2215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2222</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/00221287-148-7-2215</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sawitzke</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomason</surname>
<given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bubunenko</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costantino</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donald</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <source>Recombineering</source>, <fpage>157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>177</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sig&#xfc;enza</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flores</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hern&#xe1;ndez</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolivar</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valle</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Kinetic characterization in batch and continuous culture of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> mutants affected in phosphoenolpyruvate metabolism: differences in acetic acid production</article-title>. <source>World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>592</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1008934810150</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gill</surname>
<given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Genes restoring redox balance in fermentation-deficient <italic>E. coli</italic> NZN111</article-title>. <source>Metab. Eng.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymben.2009.07.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sprenger</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tytgat</surname>
<given-names>H. L. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Binia</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Austin</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singhal</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biology of human milk oligosaccharides: from basic Science to Clinical evidence</article-title>. <source>J. Hum. Nutr. Diet</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>280</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>299</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jhn.12990</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Srivastava</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Fed-Batch Fermentation &#x2013; design strategies</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Comprehensive biotechnology</source> (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>515</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>526</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kopatsis</surname>
<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <source>Metabolic engineering for acetate control in large scale fermentation</source>, <fpage>283</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>303</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Urashima</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taufik</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fukuda</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asakuma</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Recent advances in studies on milk oligosaccharides of cows and other domestic farm animals</article-title>. <source>Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.</source> <volume>77</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>466</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1271/bbb.120810</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vandenplas</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berger</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carnielli</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ksiazyk</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanna</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanchez Luna</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Human milk oligosaccharides: 2&#x2019;-fucosyllactose (2&#x2019;-FL) and lacto-N-neotetraose (LNnT) in infant formula</article-title>. <source>Nutrients</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1161</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nu10091161</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vasilakou</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Loosdrechet</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>AljoschaWahl</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Escherichia coli</italic> metabolism under short-term repetitive substrate dynamics: adaptation and trade-offs</article-title>. <source>Microb. Cell Factories</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>116</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12934-020-01379-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vemuri</surname>
<given-names>G. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Altman</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sangurdekar</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khodursky</surname>
<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eiteman</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Overflow metabolism in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> during steady-state growth: transcriptional regulation and effect of the redox ratio</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>72</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>3653</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3661</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.72.5.3653-3661.2006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Waegeman</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beauprez</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moens</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maertens</surname>
<given-names>Jo</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Mey</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MariaFoulqui&#xe9;-Moreno</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effect of <italic>iclR</italic> and <italic>arcA</italic> knockouts on biomass formation and metabolic fluxes in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> K12 and its implications on understanding the metabolism of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> BL21 (DE3)</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>70</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2180-11-70</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Warnecke</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gill</surname>
<given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Organic acid toxicity, tolerance, and production in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> biorefining applications</article-title>. <source>Microb. Cell Factories</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>25</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1475-2859-4-25</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z.-min</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Li</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>Ye</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Improved succinic acid production in the anaerobic culture of an <italic>Escherichia coli pflB</italic> and <italic>ldhA</italic> double mutant as a result of enhanced anaplerotic activities in the preceding aerobic culture</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>73</volume> (<issue>24</issue>), <fpage>7837</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7843</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01546-07</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>Yu</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Developing an L&#x2010;threonine&#x2010;producing strain from wild&#x2010;type <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> by modifying the glucose uptake, glyoxylate shunt, and L&#x2010;threonine biosynthetic pathway</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem.</source> <volume>66</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>962</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>976</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bab.1813</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>Li</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Engineering the robustness of industrial microbes through synthetic biology</article-title>. <source>Trends Microbiol.</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>94</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2011.12.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhuang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vemuri</surname>
<given-names>G. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahadevan</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Economics of membrane occupancy and respiro&#x2010;fermentation</article-title>. <source>Mol. Syst. Biol.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>500</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/msb.2011.34</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<sec id="s12">
<title>Nomenclature</title>
<table-wrap id="udT1" position="float">
<table>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>HMO</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Human milk oligosaccharide</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>2&#x2019;FL</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">2&#x2019;-<italic>O</italic>-fucosyllactose</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>TCA cycle</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Tricarboxylic acid cycle</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>PTS</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Phosphotransferase System</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>&#xb5;max</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Maximum specific growth rate (h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Yas</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Acetate yield (g acetate/g glucose)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Yps</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Product yield (g 2&#x2019;FL/g glucose)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Ypx</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Specific product yield (g 2&#x2019;FL/g biomass)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>Yxs</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Biomass yield (g dry biomass/g glucose)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>qs</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Specific substrate consumption rate (g glucose/OD/h)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>DO</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Dissolved oxygen content in the broth (% of saturation in the medium at atmospheric pressure and 33&#xb0;C)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>OD</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Optical density measured at 600&#xa0;nm in 1&#xa0;cm light path</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<bold>PEP</bold>
</td>
<td align="left">Phosphoenolpyruvate</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</back>
</article>