<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-4185</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1201957</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2023.1201957</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Bioengineering and Biotechnology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>A critical assessment of the <italic>Candida</italic> strains isolated from cigar tobacco leaves</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Jia et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1201957">10.3389/fbioe.2023.1201957</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>Yun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Wen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Zhen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Quanwei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Yue</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Yi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>Yuhong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Dongliang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2163236/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Cigar Fermentation Technology Key Laboratory of China Tobacco</institution>, <institution>China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co Ltd.</institution>, <addr-line>Chengdu</addr-line>, <addr-line>Sichuan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Industry Efficient Utilization to Domestic Cigar Tobacco Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province</institution>, <institution>China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co Ltd.</institution>, <addr-line>Shifang</addr-line>, <addr-line>Sichuan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/735795/overview">Fengjie Cui</ext-link>, Jiangsu University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/570550/overview">Suhana Chattopadhyay</ext-link>, University of Maryland, College Park, United States</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/302119/overview">Liaoyuan Zhang</ext-link>, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Dongliang Li, <email>360188228@qq.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>25</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>1201957</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>07</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Jia, Zhou, Yang, Zhou, Wang, Liu, Jia and Li.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Jia, Zhou, Yang, Zhou, Wang, Liu, Jia and Li</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<bold>Introduction:</bold> <italic>Candida</italic> genus plays a crucial role in cigar fermentation, and strains from different sources might have differences in metabolic characteristics. Therefore, this study conducted directional isolation of <italic>Candida</italic> strains from cigar tobacco leaves and compared their fermentabilities to screen suitable strains for cigar fermentation, thereby improving the cigar quality.</p>
<p>
<bold>Methods:</bold> First, the <italic>Candida</italic> strains from cigars tobacco leaves in different production areas were directionally isolated by pure culture. Then, the isolated strains were screened based on chemical indexes and flavor component contents. Finally, the fermentabilities of preferred strains were verified by sensory evaluation.</p>
<p>
<bold>Results:</bold> Five strains of <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> and four strains of <italic>C. metapsilosis</italic> were obtained through directional isolation. By comparing the physicochemical indexes of nine strains of <italic>Candida</italic>, it was found that <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> P1 and <italic>C. metapsilosis</italic> M4 not only reduced the alkaloids content (by 25.3% and 32.6%, respectively) but also increased the flavor components content (by 25.2% and 18.9%, respectively). Among them, P1 could raise the content of chlorophyll degradation products, carotenoid degradation products, and Maillard reaction products, and enhance the beany and nutty flavor of cigars. M4 could raise the content of chlorophyll degradation products, cembranoids degradation products, and Maillard reaction products, and improve the baking, nutty, cocoa, and honey flavor of the cigar.</p>
<p>
<bold>Discussion:</bold> In this study, the <italic>Candida</italic> strains were directionally isolated from cigars tobacco leaves in different production areas, and two functional strains suitable for cigar fermentation were screened based on physicochemical indexes and sensory evaluation, which would contribute to the directed regulation of cigar quality and flavor diversification.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cigar fermentation</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Candida</italic> strains</kwd>
<kwd>isolation and screening</kwd>
<kwd>flavor components</kwd>
<kwd>sensory evaluation</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Industrial Biotechnology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Cigars are tobacco products rolled from tobacco leaves that have been air-dried, fermented and aged (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Frankenburg, 1950</xref>). There are problems with the air-dried tobacco, such as great irritation, rough smoke, and lacking of flavor richness, and they must be fermented before they can be used to roll manufactured cigars. Fermentation could effectively degrade macromolecules such as proteins and alkaloids in tobacco leaves, reduce irritation, produce flavor components (e.g., solanone, megastigmatrienone), and ultimately forming the unique style characteristics of cigars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Li et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Zheng et al., 2022a</xref>). In addition, the style characteristics of cigars are affected by geographic origins, climates, altitudes, species, and cultivation techniques, and various factors together lead to the different flavors and experiences of cigars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Zheng et al., 2022a</xref>).</p>
<p>Traditionally, tobacco fermentation is a multispecies mixed fermentation conducted in an open environment, relying on autochthonous microbes in the tobacco leaves and fermentation environment for enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation at natural conditions, that is, natural fermentation. However, long production cycles, uncertain external environment (such as seasons) and unstable quality have limited the development of the cigar industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">J. Li et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">L. Zhang et al., 2013</xref>). To improve the stability and controllability of tobacco quality, the treatment of special tobacco leaves uses artificial fermentation, including the use of steam, pressure, and high temperature to control appropriate fermentation conditions, as well as the addition of additives (such as microbial starters and spices) for fermentation. Among them, bioaugmentation fermentation, as an artificial technique to improve the quality of fermented products by adding microbial strains with specific functions, has good application effects in degrading macromolecular substances and improving product flavor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">J. Liu et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Zheng et al., 2022b</xref>)</p>
<p>By dissecting the complex structures and succession patterns of microbial communities during cigar fermentation, it is helpful to mine functional microbes for bioaugmentation fermentation. Since the theory of microbial fermentation of tobacco was proposed by Suchsland in 1891, numerous studies based on pure culture, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies have been carried out to preliminarily resolve the microbial communities present in fermented tobacco products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Li et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Zheng et al., 2022a</xref>). For example, Zheng et al. revealed microbial communities from four famous cigar-producing regions in Dominican Republic, Brazil, Indonesia, and China through HTS, and revealed that microbial communities in cigar leaves were closely related to flavor components and style characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Zheng et al., 2022a</xref>). The statistical method of correlation provides an opportunity to analyze the function of complex microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Vilanova and Porcar, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Wang et al., 2019</xref>), as Li et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">M. Li et al., 2023</xref>) identified the core microbes in fermented pepper paste by analyzing the correlation between microorganisms and aroma substances. Furthermore, functional microbes could be isolated and studied for their effect on the flavor of fermented products by pure culture and bioaugmentation. For example, (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Zheng et al., 2022b</xref>) significantly increased the levels of solanone, trimethyl pyrazine, and megastigmatrienone in cigar tobacco leaves by inoculation with <italic>Acinetobacter</italic> strains.</p>
<p>A previous study has shown that the <italic>Candida</italic> genus has the functional potential to degrade nitrogen-containing substances and synthesize flavor substances during cigar fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Jia et al., 2023</xref>). However, <italic>Candida</italic> strains with different metabolic characteristics could cause cigars to have different sensory profiles. Therefore, this study aimed to directionally isolate <italic>Candida</italic> strains from cigars tobacco leaves in different production areas by pure culture method. Then, the fermentabilities of isolated strains were evaluated and compared, from which functional strains suitable for the fermentation of cigar tobacco leaves were screened. The research results would guide the directed regulation of cigar quality and diversification of style characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>2 Material and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>2.1 Materials and reagents</title>
<p>The fermented tobacco leaves from the Dominican Republic, Brazil, Indonesia, and China were collected and provided by China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co., Ltd. (Sichuan, China). Potato dextrose agar (PDA), potato dextrose broth (PDB), and yeast extract peptone dextrose agar (YPD) medium were purchased from Solarbio Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Ampicillin sodium was purchased from Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The fungal DNA kit was purchased from Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) grade reagents used for chromatography were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, United States). Phenylethyl acetate was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. (St. Louis, MO, United States). The QuEChERS extraction kit (Kit contents: 4&#xa0;g MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 1&#xa0;g NaCl, 1&#xa0;g NaCitrate, 0.5&#xa0;g disodium citrate sesquihydrate, 50&#xa0;mL tubes with ceramic homogenizers) was purchased from Agilent (Santa Clara, CA, United States).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>2.2 Isolation and evaluation of <italic>Candida</italic> strains</title>
<p>To isolate <italic>Candida</italic> strains, the fermented tobacco leaves were mixed with a sterile saline solution and homogenized. The suspension was then gradient diluted and spread on the surface of YPD and PDA plates added with ampicillin sodium (inhibiting bacterial growth) and propionate sodium (inhibiting fungal growth), and the plates were incubated at 30&#xb0;C for 3&#xa0;days. The genomic DNA of isolated strains was extracted using a fungal DNA kit. The internal transcribed spacer region was amplified with primers ITS1 (5&#x2032;-TCC&#x200b;GTA&#x200b;GGT&#x200b;GAA&#x200b;CCT&#x200b;GCG&#x200b;G-3&#x2032;) and ITS4 (5&#x2032;-TCC&#x200b;TCC&#x200b;GCT&#x200b;TAT&#x200b;TGA&#x200b;TAT&#x200b;GC-3&#x2032;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">White et al., 1990</xref>). The DNA sequencing of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products was performed by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The isolates were identified by Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) alignment (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/</ext-link>).</p>
<p>Then, the isolated <italic>Candida</italic> strains were separately inoculated into PDB medium and grown at 30&#xb0;C with shaking for 2&#xa0;days, and then the cultures were centrifuged at 12000&#xa0;rpm for 30&#xa0;min to collect the cells. Next, the <italic>Candida</italic> strains were individually inoculated into 5&#xa0;kg tobacco leaves with an initial cell density of 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>6</sup>&#xa0;CFU/g. Then, the tobacco leaves were evenly stacked in a constant temperature and humidity incubator at 30&#xb0;C and 70% humidity for 21&#xa0;days of fermentation. The non-inoculated sample was used as a control to evaluate the fermentation ability of different <italic>Candida</italic> strains by detecting the chemical indexes and flavor substances of the fermented tobacco leaves.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>2.3 Physicochemical composition analysis</title>
<p>As described by F. Liu et al., the contents of total sugar (TS), reducing sugar (RS), total alkaloids (NIC), and total nitrogen (TN) were detected by an active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) continuous flow instrument (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). The metabolite components were extracted by QuEChERS extraction kit, and then the contents of metabolites were examined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).</p>
<p>Extraction step: first, 2&#xa0;g of sample and 10&#xa0;mL water were added to a 50&#xa0;mL tube with ceramic homogenizers, and shaken until the sample was sufficiently infiltrated by water. Then, the metabolites were extracted by adding 10&#xa0;mL acetonitrile and 50&#xa0;&#x3bc;L phenylethyl acetate internal standard (9.06&#xa0;mg/mL) and shaking at 2000&#xa0;rpm for 2&#xa0;h. After the mixture was frozen at &#x2212;20&#xb0;C for 10&#xa0;min, a salt packet (4&#xa0;g MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 1&#xa0;g NaCl, 1&#xa0;g NaCitrate, 0.5&#xa0;g disodium citrate sesquihydrate) was added and immediately shaken to remove water. Finally, 0.15&#xa0;g MgSO<sub>4</sub> was added to 1&#xa0;mL of the supernatant and shaken at 2000&#xa0;rpm for 2&#xa0;min. After centrifuging at 6,000&#xa0;rpm for 2&#xa0;min, the supernatant was collected for further analysis.</p>
<p>The GC-MS conditions were described by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Jia et al., 2023</xref>). Separations of the metabolites compounds were performed on a DB-5MS column (60&#xa0;m &#xd7; 1.0&#xa0;&#x3bc;m &#xd7; 0.25&#xa0;mm). The initial temperature of the GC oven was 60&#xb0;C, and ramped to 250&#xb0;C at 2&#xa0;C/min, then ramped to 290&#xb0;C at 5&#xb0;C/min, finally held for 20&#xa0;min at final temperature. Helium was used as the carrier gas at the flow rate of 1.2&#xa0;mL/min. MS was operated in the electron impact mode with an ion source temperature of 230&#xb0;C and an ionization voltage of 70&#xa0;eV. Mass scan range was 26&#x2013;400 atomic mass units. Qualitative analysis of compounds was performed by matching the mass spectra with the National Institute of Standards and Technology and Wiley Library. Compounds quantification was calculated according to the ratio between the peak area of a particular compound and the internal standard.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>2.4 Sensory quality evaluation</title>
<p>After fermentation, the tobacco leaves were rolled into cigarettes with a length of 110&#xa0;mm and a diameter of 14&#xa0;mm. Then, the cigarette was conserved for 1&#xa0;month in a constant temperature and humidity incubator with a temperature of 20&#xb0;C and relative humidity of 60% for smoking evaluation. The sensory quality evaluation was performed following the Standard Evaluation Form provided by Great Wall Cigar Factory (Sichuan, China) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Hu et al., 2022</xref>). The quality characteristics consisted of mellowness, richness, matureness, irritation, smoothness, fluentness, sweetness, cleanliness, aftertaste, combustibility, ash color, and ash coagulation. The flavor characteristics mainly included caramel, beany, baking, nutty, cocoa, honey, resinous, hay, leather, and pepper flavor. A well-trained sensory panel consisting of 10 assessors majoring in cigar production was invited for the sensory quality assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>2.5 Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The Spearman&#x2019;s pairwise correlations and the significance of the correlations were calculated using corr. test function and the psych package in R (Version R-3.5.1). Significance difference analysis and Z-score normalization were performed using SPSS (Version 22.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). Further statistical analysis and graphics were performed in EXCEL 2017 software (Microsoft Office, United States) and GraphPad Prism Software (Version 8.0, GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, United States).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>3.1 Isolation of <italic>Candida</italic> strains</title>
<p>In a previous study, correlations between physicochemical metabolites and microbial communities during cigar fermentation have been analyzed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Jia et al., 2023</xref>). Correlation results indicated that the <italic>Candida</italic> genus was significantly negatively correlated with total nitrogen and alkaloids contents, while positively correlated with the total contents of flavor components, which implied that the <italic>Candida</italic> genus had the functional potential to degrade nitrogen-containing substances and synthesize flavor substances during the cigar fermentation (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). Therefore, this study conducted directional isolation of <italic>Candida</italic> strains from cigar tobacco leaves collected from the Dominican Republic, Brazil, Indonesia, and China. As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, a total of 4 strains of <italic>C. metapsilosis</italic> and 5 strains of <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> were isolated. Next, 9 strains of <italic>Candida</italic> were separately inoculated into cigar tobacco leaves with an initial cell density of 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>6</sup>&#xa0;CFU/g, and the physicochemical indexes of the fermented tobacco leaves were detected and analyzed.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Identification results of <italic>Candida</italic> isolates.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">Isolates</th>
<th align="center">Identification</th>
<th align="center">Source of isolation</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">M1</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>C. metapsilosis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">Indonesia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">M2</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>C. metapsilosis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">Dominican Republic</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">M3</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>C. metapsilosis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">China</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">M4</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>C. metapsilosis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">China</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">P1</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>C. parapsilosis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">China</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">P2</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>C. parapsilosis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">Brazil</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">P3</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>C. parapsilosis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">China</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">P4</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>C. parapsilosis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">Indonesia</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">P5</td>
<td align="center">
<italic>C. parapsilosis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">China</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>3.2 Comparison of chemical indexes</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1A, B</xref>, the contents of total sugar and reducing sugar in the bioaugmentation fermentation groups (P1&#x223c;P5, M1, M3, M4) were significantly reduced by 38.8%&#x2013;89.2% compared with the control group. However, compared with the control group, the total sugar content in the M2 group was decreased by 7.1%, and the content of reducing sugar was increased by 6.2%, which reflected the differences in the utilization ability of sugar compounds among different <italic>Candida</italic> strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Rivera and Tyx, 2021</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The contents of chemical indexes in tobacco leaves fermented with different <italic>Candida</italic> strains. <bold>(A)</bold> total sugar content; <bold>(B)</bold> reducing sugar content; <bold>(C)</bold> total nitrogen content; <bold>(D)</bold> alkaloids content. CK represented the control group, P1&#x223c;P5 represented different <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> fermentation groups, M1&#x223c;M4 represented different <italic>C. metapsilosis</italic> fermentation groups. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the control group and bioaugmentation fermentation groups (Dunnett&#x2019;s test). &#x2a;: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05; &#x2a;&#x2a;: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01; &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-11-1201957-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The protein in cigar tobacco leaves would produce a burnt feather flavor when smoked, and its content is one of the important indicators affecting the irritancy and cleanliness of cigars. Compared with the control group, the total nitrogen contents in the M2, M4, M1, P4, and P5 groups were significantly decreased by 8.3%, 6.7%, 5.5%, 3.4%, and 2.8%, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>). In contrast to the high sugar content in the M2 group, its total nitrogen content was the lowest among all the bioaugmentation groups, indicating that the M2 strain might have a higher utilization capacity for nitrogen-containing substances such as proteins.</p>
<p>In addition, higher alkaloids content could not only cause bitterness and irritancy of tobacco leaves but also have potential addictive and carcinogenic effects on humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Kaminski et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Rehder Silinski et al., 2020</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1D</xref>, the alkaloids contents in all bioaugmentation groups showed a significant decrease compared to the control group. The order of alkaloids content in these 10 groups from low to high was: M4 &#x3c; P4 &#x3c; P2 &#x3c; M2 &#x3c; P1 &#x3c; P5 &#x3c; P3 &#x3c; M3 &#x3c; M1 &#x3c; CK. Compared with control group, the alkaloids contents of M4, P4, P2, M2, and P1 groups decreased by 32.6%, 32.5%, 30.9%, 27.5%, and 25.3%, respectively.</p>
<p>Furthermore, qualitative and quantitative analysis of different alkaloids in tobacco leaves were conducted by GC-MS, and a total of seven alkaloids were detected, including cotinine, nornicotine, nicotine, N-acetyl-DL-nornicotine, isonicoteine, (1&#x2032;s, 2&#x2032;s)-nicotine-N&#x2032;-oxide (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Among them, nicotine accounted for 94.2&#x2013;98.8% of the alkaloids content and was the most dominant alkaloids. The nicotine contents of these 10 groups were ranked from low to high as: P2 &#x3c; M4 &#x3c; P1 &#x3c; P4 &#x3c; P3 &#x3c; M1 &#x3c; P5 &#x3c; M2 &#x3c; M3. Compared with the control group, the nicotine content of the P2, M4, and P1 groups decreased by 56.3%, 51.8%, and 47.6%, respectively. In general, the alkaloids contents were significantly decreased after bioaugmentation with the P1, P2, P4, and M4 strains, and the contents of seven alkaloids in the M4 group were lower than those in other bioaugmentation groups. This might be due to the conversion of alkaloids such as nicotine to amino acids, organic acids, and volatile ammonia by <italic>Candida</italic> strains during fermentation.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The changes in the content of nicotine and degradation products in different fermentation groups. CK represented the control group, P1&#x223c;P5 represented different <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> fermentation groups, M1&#x223c;M4 represented different <italic>C. metapsilosis</italic> fermentation group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-11-1201957-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>3.3 Comparison of flavor components</title>
<p>Previous studies have shown that the total content of flavor components is an important indicator of the quality of cigar tobacco leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Banozic et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Hu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Li et al., 2020</xref>). According to the classification of precursors, flavor components were mainly classified into chlorophyll degradation products, carotenoid degradation products, Maillard reaction products, cembranoids degradation products, and other flavor components (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). The total contents of flavor components of cigar leaves after bioaugmentation fermentation by different <italic>Candida</italic> strains were ranked from high to low as follows: P1 &#x3e; M4 &#x3e; P2 &#x3e; P5 &#x3e; P3 &#x3e; CK &#x3e; P4 &#x3e; P5 &#x3e; M3 &#x3e; M2 &#x3e; M1. Compared with the control group, the total content of flavor components in the P1, M4, P2, and P5 groups significantly increased by 25.2%, 18.9%, 11.1%, and 6.0%, respectively, while those in M1, M2, M3, and P4 groups significantly decreased by 19.5%, 17.7%, 13.5%, and 6.6%, respectively. The content of flavor components in tobacco leaves after bioaugmentation with different strains suggested that P1 and M4 strains might have higher abilities to synthesize flavor substances.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Flavor component content in tobacco leaves fermented with different <italic>Candida</italic> strains. CK represented the control group, P1&#x223c;P5 represented different <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> fermentation groups, M1&#x223c;M4 represented different <italic>C. metapsilosis</italic> fermentation groups. Asterisks indicate significant differences between the control group and bioaugmentation fermentation groups (Dunnett&#x2019;s test). &#x2a;: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05; &#x2a;&#x2a;: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01; &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-11-1201957-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref> showed the changes in the content of 34 flavor substances in different fermentation groups, with the majority of flavor components in the P1 and M4 groups being higher than in the other bioaugmentation groups. Compared with the control group, 25 and 21 flavor components were found to be higher in the P1 and M4 groups, respectively. In group P1, chlorophyll degradation products (e.g., phytol, neopphytodiene) and carotenoid degradation products (e.g., 1- (2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-1-Penten-3-one, phytone, &#x3b1;-farnesene, megastigmatrienone) were more abundant than those in the control group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). In the group M4, the contents of chlorophyll degradation products (e.g., neophytodiene), carotenoid degradation products (e.g., 6,10-dimethyl-5,9-undecadien-2-one, trans-geranylgeraniol, 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-2 (4&#xa0;h)-benzofuranone, megastigmatrienone, 1-methyl-4- (1-methylethenyl)-7-oxabicyclo [4.1.0] heptane, cis-beta-bergamotene), cembranoids degradation products (e.g., solanone), and Maillard reaction products (e.g., 3-ethyl-3,4-dihydro-2 (1H)-quinoxalinone, tetrahydro-2,4-dimethyl-furan, tetrahydro-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-furan) were higher than those in the control group. Overall, the total contents of chlorophyll degradation products, carotenoid degradation products, and Maillard reaction products were significantly higher in the P1 group than those in the control group, while the total contents of chlorophyll degradation products, cembranoids degradation products, and Maillard reaction products were significantly higher in M4 group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>The changes in the content of flavor substances in different fermentation groups. CK represented the control group, P1&#x223c;P5 represented different <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> fermentation groups, M1&#x223c;M4 represented different <italic>C. metapsilosis</italic> fermentation group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-11-1201957-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The contents of flavor compounds after fermentation with <italic>Candida</italic> strains P1 and M4 (mg/kg).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="center">CAS</th>
<th align="center">Compounds name</th>
<th align="center">CK</th>
<th align="center">P1</th>
<th align="center">M4</th>
<th align="center">Flavor<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="center">150-86-7</td>
<td align="center">Phytol</td>
<td align="center">216.0</td>
<td align="center">228.4</td>
<td align="center">218.5</td>
<td align="center">Floral</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">504-96-1</td>
<td align="center">Neophytadiene</td>
<td align="center">1542.5</td>
<td align="center">2124.1</td>
<td align="center">2096.4</td>
<td align="center">Freshness</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Chlorophyll degradation products</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>1758.5</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>2352.5&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>2135.2&#x2a;&#x2a;</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">29171-20-8</td>
<td align="center">6-octen-1-yn-3-ol, 3,7-dimethyl-</td>
<td align="center">70.5</td>
<td align="center">32.7</td>
<td align="center">43.2</td>
<td align="center">Fruity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">106-21-8</td>
<td align="center">1-octanol, 3,7-dimethyl-</td>
<td align="center">62.8</td>
<td align="center">41.6</td>
<td align="center">34.4</td>
<td align="center">Floral</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">3796-70-1</td>
<td align="center">5,9-undecadien-2-one, 6,10-dimethyl-, (e)-</td>
<td align="center">38.8</td>
<td align="center">35.4</td>
<td align="center">49.7</td>
<td align="center">Fruity, floral</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">13741-21-4</td>
<td align="center">1,3,6,10-dodecatetraene, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, (z,e)-</td>
<td align="center">13.2</td>
<td align="center">39.2</td>
<td align="center">32.0</td>
<td align="center">Fruity, herb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">73410-02-3</td>
<td align="center">6-hydroxy-4,4,7a-trimethyl-5,6,7,7a-tetrahydrobenzofuran-2 (4&#xa0;h)-one</td>
<td align="center">32.9</td>
<td align="center">47.5</td>
<td align="center">56.2</td>
<td align="center">Fruity, musk, wood</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">58319-06-5</td>
<td align="center">Sesquithujene</td>
<td align="center">14.1</td>
<td align="center">19.9</td>
<td align="center">7.5</td>
<td align="center">Spice, herb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">127-43-5</td>
<td align="center">1-penten-3-one, 1- (2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexen-1-yl)-</td>
<td align="center">73.3</td>
<td align="center">84.8</td>
<td align="center">44.9</td>
<td align="center">Floral</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">83-48-7</td>
<td align="center">Stigmasterol</td>
<td align="center">254.8</td>
<td align="center">282.0</td>
<td align="center">194.5</td>
<td align="center">Beany</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">502-69-2</td>
<td align="center">Phytone</td>
<td align="center">69.7</td>
<td align="center">82.7</td>
<td align="center">56.5</td>
<td align="center">Floral</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">17974-57-1</td>
<td align="center">(3e,5e,7e)-6-methyl-8- (2,6,6-trimethyl-1-cyclohexenyl)-3,5,7-octatrien-2-one</td>
<td align="center">21.6</td>
<td align="center">38.9</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center">Fruity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">64243-62-5</td>
<td align="center">7,11-epoxymegastigma-5 (6)-en-9-one</td>
<td align="center">38.1</td>
<td align="center">65.1</td>
<td align="center">50.5</td>
<td align="center">Fruity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">34318-21-3</td>
<td align="center">2-cyclohexen-1-one, 4- (3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-3,5,5-trimethyl-</td>
<td align="center">13.6</td>
<td align="center">15.1</td>
<td align="center">17.3</td>
<td align="center">Floral, woody, nutty</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">35044-68-9</td>
<td align="center">Beta-damascone</td>
<td align="center">108.7</td>
<td align="center">109.4</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center">Fruity, rose</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">502-61-4</td>
<td align="center">Alpha-farnesene</td>
<td align="center">31.7</td>
<td align="center">162.3</td>
<td align="center">10.7</td>
<td align="center">Fruity, herb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">24034-73-9</td>
<td align="center">Trans-geranylgeraniol</td>
<td align="center">42.5</td>
<td align="center">33.3</td>
<td align="center">59.8</td>
<td align="center">Spice, herb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">15356-74-8</td>
<td align="center">2 (4&#xa0;h)-benzofuranone, 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl-</td>
<td align="center">38.7</td>
<td align="center">33.0</td>
<td align="center">48.5</td>
<td align="center">Fruity, musk, wood</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">96-08-2</td>
<td align="center">7-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane, 1-methyl-4- (2-methyloxiranyl)-</td>
<td align="center">135.1</td>
<td align="center">117.0</td>
<td align="center">159.0</td>
<td align="center">Fruity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">38818-55-2</td>
<td align="center">Megastigmatrienone</td>
<td align="center">18.1</td>
<td align="center">54.0</td>
<td align="center">57.3</td>
<td align="center">Nutty, floral, woody</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">432-24-6</td>
<td align="center">2-cyclohexene-1-carboxaldehyde, 2,6,6-trimethyl-</td>
<td align="center">148.6</td>
<td align="center">137.2</td>
<td align="center">164.8</td>
<td align="center">Fruity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">72777-88-9</td>
<td align="center">7-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-3-ol, 6- (3-hydroxy-1-butenyl)-1,5,5-trimethyl-</td>
<td align="center">18.2</td>
<td align="center">28.0</td>
<td align="center">50.0</td>
<td align="center">Floral, woody</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">18794-84-8</td>
<td align="center">(e)-beta-famesene</td>
<td align="center">15.8</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center">Spice, herb, fresh green, sweet</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">39763-33-2</td>
<td align="center">(s,e)-4-hydroxy-3,5,5-trimethyl-4- (3-oxobut-1-en-1-yl)cyclohex-2-enone</td>
<td align="center">39.8</td>
<td align="center">52.4</td>
<td align="center">88.9</td>
<td align="center">Floral</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">1195-92-2</td>
<td align="center">7-oxabicyclo[4.1.0]heptane, 1-methyl-4- (1-methylethenyl)-</td>
<td align="center">55.1</td>
<td align="center">31.3</td>
<td align="center">104.8</td>
<td align="center">Fruity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">55123-21-2</td>
<td align="center">cis-beta-bergamotene</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center">14.2</td>
<td align="center">50.9</td>
<td align="center">ruity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Carotenoid degradation products</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>1355.6</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>1557.0&#x2a;&#x2a;</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>1366.7</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">96-76-4</td>
<td align="center">2,4-di-tert-butylphenol</td>
<td align="center">96.1</td>
<td align="center">98.6</td>
<td align="center">108.2</td>
<td align="center">fFruity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">79-92-5</td>
<td align="center">Camphene</td>
<td align="center">17.5</td>
<td align="center">17.6</td>
<td align="center">7.4</td>
<td align="center">Camphor, mothball, oil, warm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">18383-59-0</td>
<td align="center">cis-chrysanthemyl alcohol</td>
<td align="center">20.0</td>
<td align="center">25.2</td>
<td align="center">11.6</td>
<td align="center">Floral</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">29548-02-5</td>
<td align="center">1,3,6-heptatriene, 2,5,5-trimethyl-</td>
<td align="center">16.8</td>
<td align="center">24.1</td>
<td align="center">15.5</td>
<td align="center">Fruity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Other flavor compounds</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>150.4</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>165.5</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>154.7</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">513-23-5</td>
<td align="center">bicyclo [3.1.0] hexan-3-ol, 4-methyl-1- (1-methylethyl)-</td>
<td align="center">36.2</td>
<td align="center">50.0</td>
<td align="center">31.8</td>
<td align="center">Spice, herb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">54868-48-3</td>
<td align="center">Solanone</td>
<td align="center">23.8</td>
<td align="center">16.1</td>
<td align="center">66.1</td>
<td align="center">Fruity, tobacco</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Cembranoids degradation products</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>60.0</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>66.0</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>16.6&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">39168-02-0</td>
<td align="center">Furan, tetrahydro-2,4-dimethyl-, trans-</td>
<td align="center">0.1</td>
<td align="center">8.7</td>
<td align="center">8.6</td>
<td align="center">Nutty, sweet</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">15045-43-9</td>
<td align="center">Furan, tetrahydro-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center">11.7</td>
<td align="center">18.9</td>
<td align="center">Nutty, sweet</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="center">
<bold>Maillard reaction products</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>0.1</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>20.4&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</bold>
</td>
<td align="center">
<bold>19.5&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</bold>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>
<sup>a</sup>
</label>
<p>From flavor databases (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.femaflavor.org/flavor-library">https://www.femaflavor.org/flavor-library</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com">http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com</ext-link>; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://foodb.ca/compounds">https://foodb.ca/compounds</ext-link>).</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Asterisks indicate significant differences between the control group and bioaugmentation fermentation groups (Dunnett&#x2019;s test). &#x2a;: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05; &#x2a;&#x2a;: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01; &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;: <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>The bold words &#x201c;Chlorophyll degradation products, Carotenoid degradation products, Cembranoids degradation products, Maillard reaction products, Other flavor compounds&#x201d; represent the classification of different substances.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>3.4 Sensory evaluation</title>
<p>By comparing the metabolic characteristics of nine <italic>Candida</italic> strains, it was found that <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> P1 and <italic>C. metapsilosis</italic> M4 strains could not only increase the total content of flavor components but also reduce the alkaloids content in cigar tobacco leaves, which have great potential as starter. Therefore, the bioaugmentation effects of the P1 and M4 strains were verified by sensory evaluation. It was found that both P1 and M4 strains could improve the irritation and cleanliness, enhance the matureness, smoothness, fluentness, sweetness, and combustibility, and improve the coagulation and color of ash (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A</xref>). Among them, P1 could improve the beany and nutty flavor of cigar tobacco leaves, while M4 could enhance the baking, nutty, cocoa, honey, resinous, and hay flavor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Radar plots of sensory scores of tobacco leaves fermented with <italic>Candida</italic> strains P1 and M4. <bold>(A)</bold> flavor characteristics; <bold>(B)</bold> quality characteristics. CK represented the control group, P1 represented P1 fermentation groups, M4 represented M4 fermentation groups.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-11-1201957-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<p>The main purpose of cigar fermentation is to enhance flavor richness by increasing the flavor component content and improve irritation by minimizing the alkaloids content of tobacco leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Frankenburg, 1950</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Li et al., 2020</xref>). Previous correlation analyses implied that the <italic>Candida</italic> genus was negatively correlated with the nitrogen-containing substance contents, positively correlated with flavor components contents, and has been used in the production of traditional food fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Jiang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Lu et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Jia et al., 2023</xref>). For example, Bressani (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bressani et al., 2021</xref>) studied the effect of inoculation of <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> on coffee and found that the body, overall flavor, aftertaste, and acidity were positively correlated with <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> population. However, <italic>Candida</italic> strains from different sources have different properties that could lead to different sensory characteristics of cigars. Therefore, this study selectively isolated <italic>Candida</italic> strains from cigar tobacco leaves from the Dominican Republic, Brazil, Indonesia, and China using a pure culture method. Then, the fermentation performances of nine isolated <italic>Candida</italic> strains were compared based on chemical indexes and flavor components. It was found that the alkaloids content decreased and flavor components content increased to various degrees in the bioaugmentation group. This might be due to the degradation of proteins and alkaloids into small molecules amino acids and flavor substances by <italic>Candida</italic> strains during fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Di Giacomo et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Frankenburg, 1950</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Liu et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Among them, <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> P1 and <italic>C. metapsilosis</italic> M4 could significantly reduce the alkaloids content and increase the flavor components content in cigar tobacco leaves compared to other strains, which have great potential as fermentation starters. Compared with the control group, the alkaloids contents of P1 and M4 decreased by 25.3% and 32.6%, the nicotine contents decreased by 47.6% and 51.8%. Alkaloids could cause bitterness and irritancy in tobacco leaves, and reducing their content could help improve the maturity and safety of cigars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Kaminski et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Rehder Silinski et al., 2020</xref>). In addition, the total contents of flavor components of P1 and M4 groups increased by 25.2% and 18.9%, respectively, compared with the control group. According to the classification of precursors, flavor components were mainly classified into degradation products of chlorophyll, degradation products of carotenoids, Maillard reaction products, and degradation products of cembranoids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Rodriguez-Bustamante et al., 2005</xref>). The types and content of these flavor substances had a crucial influence on the flavor profile and quality of cigar tobacco leaves. Specifically, the total contents of chlorophyll degradation products, carotenoid degradation products, and Maillard reaction products were higher in the P1 group than in the control group, while the total contents of chlorophyll degradation products, cembranoids degradation products, and Maillard reaction products were significantly higher in the M4 group. The sensory evaluation further showed that both P1 and M4 could improve irritancy and cleanliness. This might be due to the degradation of irritant proteins and alkaloids by <italic>Candida</italic> strains while generating chlorophyll degradation products (e.g., neophytodienes) that could increase flavor and decrease irritancy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Li et al., 2020</xref>). Among them, P1 could improve the beany and nutty flavors of cigar tobacco leaves, which might be attributed to its ability to elevate the contents of carotenoid degradation products (e.g., megastigmatrienone) and Maillard reaction products (e.g., tetrahydro-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl--furan) in cigar leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Zhu et al., 2021</xref>). M4 could enhance the flavor of baking, nutty, cocoa, and honey, which might be related to the fact that M4 could raise the contents of carotenoid degradation products (e.g., cis-beta-bergamotene), cembranoids degradation products (<italic>e.g.,</italic> solanone), and Maillard reaction products (e.g., tetrahydro-2,4-dimethyl-furan) in cigar tobacco leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Kon&#xe9; et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Zhang et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, this study conducted targeted isolation of <italic>Candida</italic> strains from different sources of cigar tobacco leaves, and explored the functions of the nine isolated strains of <italic>Candida</italic>. Based on chemical indexes and flavor components, <italic>C. parapsilosis</italic> P1 and <italic>C metapsilosis</italic> M4 were selected as fermentation starters suitable for cigar fermentation. The bioaugmentation fermentation further verified that P1 and M4 could not only enhance the flavor richness by increasing the flavor components but also improve irritancy and safety by reducing the total nitrogen and alkaloids content. Bioaugmentation fermentation by mining and screening strains with different flavor profiles would help to highlight the typicality of cigar style characteristics and promote flavor diversification. In the future, we would further explore the effects of different addition amounts, addition timing, temperature, and relative humidity on the quality of cigar tobacco leaves, and monitor the changes of microbial community and functional genes during the bioaugmentation process by multi-omics methods such as amplicon sequencing and metagenomics, so as to better understand the fermentation mechanism of <italic>Candida</italic> and its impact on cigar tobacco quality.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Material</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YnJ: conceptualization, methodology, Writing&#x2014;Original Draft. WZ: supervision. ZY: writing&#x2014;review and editing. QZ: methodology. YW: investigation. YhJ: validation. YL: investigation. DL: project administration, writing&#x2014;review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was financially supported by the China National Tobacco Corporation 2020 Major Science and Technology Project 110202001040 (XJ-02) and 110202101062 (XJ-11). The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article, or the decision to submit it for publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>Authors YnJ, WZ, ZY, QZ, YW, YL, YhJ, and DL were employed by China Tobacco Sichuan Industrial Co Ltd.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1201957/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1201957/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.PDF" id="SM1" mimetype="application/PDF" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Banozic</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aladic</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jerkovic</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jokic</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Volatile organic compounds of tobacco leaves versus waste (scrap, dust, and midrib): extraction and optimization</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food. Agric.</source> <volume>101</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1822</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1832</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.10796</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bressani</surname>
<given-names>A. P. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinez</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Batista</surname>
<given-names>N. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simao</surname>
<given-names>J. B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dias</surname>
<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwan</surname>
<given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Co-Inoculation of yeasts starters: a strategy to improve quality of low altitude arabica coffee</article-title>. <source>Food. Chem.</source> <volume>361</volume>, <fpage>130133</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130133</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Di Giacomo</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paolino</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silvestro</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vigliotta</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Imperi</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Visca</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Microbial community structure and dynamics of dark fire-cured tobacco fermentation</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>73</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>825</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>837</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02378-06</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Frankenburg</surname>
<given-names>W. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1950</year>). <article-title>Chemical changes in the harvested tobacco leaf. II. Chemical and enzymic conversions during fermentation and aging</article-title>. <source>Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas. Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9780470122556.ch8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Exogenous additives facilitate the fermentation of cigar tobacco leaves: improving sensory quality and contents of aroma components</article-title>. <source>Food. Sci. Tech.</source> <volume>42</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/fst.68122</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Development of Candida autochthonous starter for cigar fermentation via dissecting the microbiome</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1138877</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1138877</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of aroma-producing yeasts in high-salt liquid-state fermentation soy sauce and the biosynthesis pathways of the dominant esters</article-title>. <source>Food. Chem.</source> <volume>344</volume>, <fpage>128681</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128681</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaminski</surname>
<given-names>K. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bovet</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laparra</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Palo</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sierro</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Alkaloid chemophenetics and transcriptomics of the <italic>Nicotiana</italic> genus</article-title>. <source>Phytochemistry</source> <volume>177</volume>, <fpage>112424</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112424</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kon&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu&#xe9;hi</surname>
<given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Durand</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ban-Koffi</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berthiot</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tachon</surname>
<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Contribution of predominant yeasts to the occurrence of aroma compounds during cocoa bean fermentation</article-title>. <source>Food. Res. Int.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>910</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>917</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2016.04.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Influence of microbiota and metabolites on the quality of tobacco during fermentation</article-title>. <source>Bmc Microbiol.</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>356</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-020-02035-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lao</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Identification and validation of core microbes associated with key aroma formation in fermented pepper paste (<italic>Capsicum annuum L</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Food Res Int</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>112194</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112194</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xi</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Microbial community and metabolic function analysis of cigar tobacco leaves during fermentation</article-title>. <source>Microbiologyopen</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>e1171</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mbo3.1171</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>K. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Nicotine-degrading microorganisms and their potential applications</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>99</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>3775</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3785</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-015-6525-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chi</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Bio-augmented effect of <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> and <italic>Candida versatilis</italic> on microbial community and flavor metabolites during Chinese horse bean-chili-paste fermentation</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>351</volume>, <fpage>109262</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2021.109262</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rehder Silinski</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uenoyama</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coleman</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blake</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname>
<given-names>B. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marusich</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Analysis of nicotine and non-nicotine tobacco constituents in aqueous smoke/aerosol extracts by UHPLC and ultraperformance convergence chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry</article-title>. <source>Chem. Res. Toxicol.</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2988</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3000</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00312</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rivera</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tyx</surname>
<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Microbiology of the American smokeless tobacco</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>105</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>4843</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4853</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-021-11382-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodriguez-Bustamante</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maldonado-Robledo</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ortiz</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diaz-Avalos</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanchez</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Bioconversion of lutein using a microbial mixture--maximizing the production of tobacco aroma compounds by manipulation of culture medium</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>68</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>182</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-004-1868-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vilanova</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porcar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Are multi-omics enough?</article-title> <source>Nat. Microbiol.</source> <volume>1</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>16101</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.101</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nie</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Construction of synthetic microbiota for reproducible flavor compound metabolism in Chinese light-aroma-type liquor produced by solid-state fermentation</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>85</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>e03090-18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e03018</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.03090-18</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>White</surname>
<given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruns</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Innis</surname>
<given-names>D. H. G. Michael A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sninsky</surname>
<given-names>John J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname>
<given-names>Thomas J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>San Diego, CA, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>322</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) for the characterization of cigar leaves</article-title>. <source>Lc. Gc. N. Am.</source> <volume>39</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>390</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>397</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Metabolic profiling of Chinese tobacco leaf of different geographical origins by GC-MS</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food. Chem.</source> <volume>61</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2597</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2605</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf400428t</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022a</year>). <article-title>Analysis of microbial community, volatile flavor compounds, and flavor of cigar tobacco leaves from different regions</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>907270</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.907270</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022b</year>). <article-title>Effects of Inoculation with <italic>Acinetobacter</italic> on fermentation of cigar tobacco leaves</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>911791</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.911791</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Characterization of key aroma compounds and enantiomer distribution in Longjing tea</article-title>. <source>Food. Chem.</source> <volume>361</volume>, <fpage>130096</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130096</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>