Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2296-4185 Frontiers Media S.A. 1117871 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1117871 Bioengineering and Biotechnology Mini Review Nucleotide detection mechanism and comparison based on low-dimensional materials: A review Azeem et al. 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1117871 Azeem M. Mustafa 1 * Shafa Muhammad 2 Aamir Muhammad 3 * Zubair Muhammad 4 Souayeh Basma 5 Alam Mir Waqas 5 1 Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, United States 2 Yunnan Key Laboratory of Metal-Organic Molecular Materials and Devices, Kunming University, Kunming, Yunnan, China 3 Department of Basic Science, Deanship of Preparatory Year, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia 4 Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering Department, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates 5 Department of Physics, College of Science, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

Edited by: Jeong-Hwan Kim, Yokohama City University, Japan

Reviewed by: Weiling Song, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, China

Quanjiang Dong, Qingdao University Medical College, China

 *Correspondence: M. Mustafa Azeem, mustafa@mst.edu; Muhammad Aamir, msadiq@kfu.edu.sa

This article was submitted to Biosensors and Biomolecular Electronics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

 02 03 2023 2023 11 1117871 07 12 2022 13 02 2023 Copyright © 2023 Azeem, Shafa, Aamir, Zubair, Souayeh and Alam. 2023 Azeem, Shafa, Aamir, Zubair, Souayeh and Alam

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

The recent pandemic has led to the fabrication of new nucleic acid sensors that can detect infinitesimal limits immediately and effectively. Therefore, various techniques have been demonstrated using low-dimensional materials that exhibit ultrahigh detection and accuracy. Numerous detection approaches have been reported, and new methods for impulse sensing are being explored. All ongoing research converges at one unique point, that is, an impetus: the enhanced limit of detection of sensors. There are several reviews on the detection of viruses and other proteins related to disease control point of care; however, to the best of our knowledge, none summarizes the various nucleotide sensors and describes their limits of detection and mechanisms. To understand the far-reaching impact of this discipline, we briefly discussed conventional and nanomaterial-based sensors, and then proposed the feature prospects of these devices. Two types of sensing mechanisms were further divided into their sub-branches: polymerase chain reaction and photospectrometric-based sensors. The nanomaterial-based sensor was further subdivided into optical and electrical sensors. The optical sensors included fluorescence (FL), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), colorimetric, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), while electrical sensors included electrochemical luminescence (ECL), microfluidic chip, and field-effect transistor (FET). A synopsis of sensing materials, mechanisms, detection limits, and ranges has been provided. The sensing mechanism and materials used were discussed for each category in terms of length, collectively forming a fusing platform to highlight the ultrahigh detection technique of nucleotide sensors. We discussed potential trends in improving the fabrication of nucleotide nanosensors based on low-dimensional materials. In this area, particular aspects, including sensitivity, detection mechanism, stability, and challenges, were addressed. The optimization of the sensing performance and selection of the best sensor were concluded. Recent trends in the atomic-scale simulation of the development of Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sensors using 2D materials were highlighted. A critical overview of the challenges and opportunities of deoxyribonucleic acid sensors was explored, and progress made in deoxyribonucleic acid detection over the past decade with a family of deoxyribonucleic acid sensors was described. Areas in which further research is needed were included in the future scope.

 detection deoxyribonucleic acid sensors polymerase chain reaction surface plasmon resonance field effect transistor nucleotide sensors 1 Introduction

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) carries the genetic information constituent of deoxyribose and nitrogenous bases known as nucleotides or fragments of DNA (Wilkins, 1956). These nucleotides contain genetic information that can encode life (Stegmann, 2005). As its size is comparable to the nanoscale, the double helix structure was reported in 1953 by Watson and Crick (1953). This well-known DNA double helix is formed from pairs of complementary single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) is a pair of bonded ssDNA (Watson and Crick, 1953).

Structural nanotechnology has made significant progress in terms of the rapid sensitivity of DNA sequences (Zhou et al., 2020). Each existing DNA is unique, indicating that DNA sequence is crucial for detecting, and it has been studied in the fight against sporadic pandemics. A small part of the DNA that holds genetic information is known as a gene. A complete DNA sequence of DNA is imperative for the fabrication of vaccines. Over the past two decades, many new methodologies have been developed for the detection of DNA, which has ultimately assisted in portable point-of-care diagnostics. Indigenous DNA is negatively charged (Zhang et al., 2007), which can be manipulated by several strategies, such as creating an electric field; thus, it behaves like electrons to attract positively charged particles (Liu and Hu, 2007). Therefore, the identification of specific DNA sequences is a crucial task achieved using modern nanotechnology, which consequently opens a new era of exploration ranging from detection to gene mutation. DNA sensors are capable of detecting changes in the form of electrical signals generated through the immune system in response to any perturbation. They convert biochemical reactions into a signal for further detection. Currently, integrated multiscale simulation and experimental techniques are used to study biosensing applications in a variety of interdisciplinary fields (Quan et al., 2018; Mohammadi et al., 2021; Babar et al., 2022).

Low-dimensional (LD) materials are a class of materials with extraordinary characteristics (Babar et al., 2022). They include graphene and carbon nanotubes (CNT), MXenes (Ti2C3), hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), etc. (Mohammadi et al., 2021). They have displayed they are being used in a variety of applications. Currently, LD based sensors are replacing traditional sensors (Wu et al., 2022). LD materials are used for protective coating and biosensors due to their tunable, electrical, and optical, and excellent mechanical properties. They are also being used as substrate materials in electronic sensors due to their multilayered structures. Additionally, these materials modify their surface chemistry through associated functional groups due to which they respond to a specific analyte (Bolotsky et al., 2019). Other than normal 2D structures, very new types of nanostructured materials with improved optical properties have been reported (Kim and Benelmekki, 2019). They have diverse industrial applications, particularly suitable for biomolecular sensing. These are known as “smart nanosheets or nanoscrolls” (Kim et al., 2014; Kim and Benelmekki, 2018; Kim and Benelmekki, 2019; Benelmekki and Kim, 2023).

To achieve global market demand, the fabrication of DNA sensors should possess a low cost, low range of detection (LOD), simple and low processing time with high speed, and high selectivity. There are two main types of DNA detection techniques: conventional spectrophotometric and polymerase chain reactions (PCRs), and modern nanomaterial-based sensors, which are further subdivided into optical and electrical sensors. Optical sensors based on fluorescence (FL), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), colorimetric, and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) techniques, whereas electrical sensors based on electrochemical luminescence (ECL), chip-based, and field-effect transistors (FET) are described in Figure 1.

Division of nucleotide sensors.

Detection methods based on electrical sensors have been gaining attention in the global market owing to their high multiplexing capability, high sensitivity, and wide dynamic range. The major contribution of biosensor involves a transduction mechanism for detection. The transducer transforms the electrical signal from the analyte and amplify it. Conventional sensors have low accuracy and expensive and complex instrumentation whereas nanomaterial-based sensors are more compatible and provide a proficient detection. However, the optical method is commonly used because it has numerous defects, such as it is difficult to reliably profile low-abundance genes, and it requires expensive fabrication of these optical devices and complex bioinformatics tools for fluorescence signal identification. FET-based nano electronic devices have attracted much attention owing to their small scale, simple design, and better performance compared with conventional devices.

Because of the discovery of DNA sensors, efforts have been made to demonstrate and optimize them for portable point-of-care applications. The continuous demand and advancement of nanotechnology has been pointed out by experts, and the DNA sensor market is predicted to reach up to 28 billion dollars. This set an annual growth rate of 8.4% in 2022, as illustrated in Figure 2. In particular, Figure 2 represents data rooted from Scopus using search title as “DNA/RNA/Nucleic acid sensor” and immunosensor/antibody sensor, and “Enzyme’’ sensor (Mujawar et al., 2020).

Representation of biosensors in the US industry and annual budget expenses (Mujawar et al., 2020).

 2 DNA sensors and types

A sensor is a combination of receptor-transducer, which converts the biochemical response to signals emitted from the source. Moreover, DNA sensors monitor involving biomolecular processes. A biosensor consists of an analyte, bioreceptor, transducer, electronics, and display setup (Naresh and Lee, 2021).

2.1 Conventional sensors (Cs) 2.1.1 Spectrophotometric sensor (Sps)

The interaction of light with matter, known as spectrometry, is an ancient technique that has been used in the fields of chemistry and biomedicine because of its low cost, simplicity, and convenience. This has led to the analytical detection of DNA derivatives, such as nucleic acids and nucleotides, owing to the presence of double bond systems as a consequence of these bonds responding to ultraviolet light in the spectrum. This type of specific absorbance will be helpful for the quantitative measurement of DNA by spectrophotometry in the form of micrograms/mL. The absorbance phenomenon corresponds to the transition of electrons from either the anti-bonding (π*) state to the non-bonding (n) state or from the anti-bonding (π*) state to the bonding state (π) associated with a specific energy (Mujawar et al., 2020). Infect nucleic acids have maximum absorbance of UV light at a wavelength of 260 nm; thus, a solution of DNA is exposed to quantify the exposed sample. The drawback of this methodology is that there is a considerably weak signal for single-stranded nucleic acids owing to the lack of bonding, anti-bonding, and non-bonding states. Furthermore, this technique cannot describe the detailed sequences of nucleic acids. As nucleic acids absorb UV light at 260 nm, the compound containing them absorbs UV at 280 nm. The purity of the sample can be calculated by the ratio of absorbance measurement following the criteria for being pure, i.e., A 260 A 280 > 1.7 (Shen, 2019).

 2.1.2 Polymerase chain reaction-based sensor (PCRs)

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is an in vitro technique that can detect and amplify small DNA segments. Through this technique, millions of copies are developed in a fraction of the time. This method was proposed in early 1980 (Cantor, 1998), and has been used globally in various fields, such as food quality insurance, genetics, molecular biology, and forensic science. It is a well-established amplification technique during which millions of amplitudes are generated from a small segment of DNA in a short interval of time. Although it is a low-cost and universally used method, constraints, such as indirect melting temperature measurements and premier annealing, hinder their applications. Furthermore, specific amplification will only occur within a narrow range of reaction conditions that ultimately cause the failure of the PCR testing methodology.

For the sample preparation, errors in the volume of reagents significantly alter the result of the polymerase chain reactions cycle that may disrupt the melting temperature, premier annealing, and amplification. All of the building blocks of PCR hinder portability, as these types of measurements cannot be performed outside the laboratory in a well-controlled environment. Signal transduction mechanisms are another significant barrier that prevents PCR from becoming a popular portable device without the use of expensive instruments, such as PCR machines, and complicated processes, including electrophoresis. All these challenges limit the use of PCR as a portable device. Therefore, a simple modification was introduced using a colorimetric assay for the reserved transcription of DNA fragments known as real-time PCR (rt-PCR). RT-PCR was first described in 1990, and a schematic description is shown in Figure 3, which displays a comparison of the different PCR techniques. Conventional PCR, also known as end-point PCR for analysis of DNA amplification, was conducted at the end of fluorescent marking, whereas amplified DNA was analyzed during each cycle, also known as real-time PCR (Wang et al., 2018b). In general PCR, the fragmentation of DNA is pulled through the gel matrix using a centrifugal electric field that separates DNA segments. This process is called electrophoresis. The second PCR test known as qPCR is quantitative PCR, and it is a much more dynamic range of analysis than that of conventional PCR. It is also a modified form of PCR to qualitatively analyze the DNA by the introduction of florescent dyes during PCR cycles. The output of rPCR is typically displayed in the form of sinusoidal followed by a plateau. Digital PCR (dPCR) follows the random distribution of particles over numerous partitions. Each partition acts as an individual PCR through fluorescence detection. Poisson’s statistics were applied to the sample partitions to calculate the concentration of the target sequence from the proportion of the amplified positive concentration. The process constitutes independent partitioning and amplification followed by florescence detection.

Comparison of different PCR-based techniques (Quan et al., 2018).

 2.2 Nanomaterial’s base sensors (NMBs)

Nanomaterial-based sensors are considered efficient sensors with excellent signal absorption strength due to quantum effects. They have a high surface-to-volume ratio and higher optical and magnetic properties which make them reasonably good for sensing all types of analytes (Santhanam et al., 2020). Numerous NMBs have been used for DNA biocompatibility because of their higher signal detection capability and transduction technology which converts signals from an analyte during its biochemical reaction (Hlongwane et al., 2019). DNA sensing using NMBs has been included in the following sections.

2.2.1 Optical sensors (Ops)

These biosensors measure changes in optical properties, such as resonance, reflectance, absorbance, and luminescence from the sensor surface. This system measures the fluorescence from nanomaterials based on the detection of DNA hybridization (Vikrant et al., 2019). The optical sensors have been attracted due to their efficient detection level. The materials used in these detectors effectively amplify the detection signal. We summarized a few optical techniques used for developing nanomaterial-based DNA biosensors.

2.2.1.1 Fluorescence-based DNA sensors (FBs)

In such sensors, a fluorescent nanomaterial, known as the transducer, is conjugated with a DNA molecule acting as a target molecule. A fluorescence spectrophotometer was used to measure the fluorescence emitted from the nanomaterial conjugated with the target DNA, which is known as fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) (Ploetz et al., 2016). In this technique, excited electrons were transferred from DNA to nanomaterials at resonance separated by a nanoscale distance without emission of a photon; this process is called fluorescence quenching (FQ). In the presence of the probe and target DNA, both combine to form a hybrid that leads to a change in the fluorescence intensity of the nanomaterials, similar to the aptamer/DNA sensor. Figure 4 shows a scheme of target detection based on FRET with reduced graphene quantum dots (GQDs) combined with probe (complementary) DNA (single-stranded). A spectrophotometer was used to measure the resonance intensity at the graphene monolayer surface. The FRET signal emerging from the layer was analyzed for the DNA structures. Initially, inorganic GQDs reaction with NaBH4 (sodium borohydride) results in reduced GQDs called (rGQDs) followed by connecting DNA (cDNA). This reaction is further divided into three steps. In the first step single strand DNA (ssDNA) interact with GQDs via a condensation reaction. Later, this interaction is absorbed through electrostatic stacking making a base pair of ssDNA-rGQDs/GO. Lastly, the base pair interact with the target DNA (tDNA). This tDNA is replaced by a single-based mismatched DNA (mDNA) making a double-strand DNA (dsDNA)-rGQDs compound detached to produce florescence recovery (Qian et al., 2014).

Schematic of a universal fiuorescence based sensor mechanism for the detection of DNA -FRET between GQDs and graphene oxide (GO) (Qian et al., 2014).

An overview of the variety of recently reported FRET-based DNA detection techniques is listed in Table 1. This table shows the complete information reading type of materials used, techniques and strategies of DNA detection, limit of detection, and range of analyte concentration. Herein, we can conclude that by using a tetrahedral DNA framework, we can achieve a DNA detection limit of 1 fM (Li et al., 2020b) while using Cu (I)-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition (CuAAC) as a fluorescent nanomaterial can achieve a detection range of 0.22 fM reported by Zheng et al. (2020). Furthermore, Zhang D et al. (2020) reported a 23.8 aM level detection limit using the composition of magnetic beads (MBs) that contain phosphate- Zr4+-carboxylate/Cu(II) Br/EDTA for lung cancer DNA. Another finding of magnetic nanoparticle-based on poly-enzyme nanobeads fluorescence assay show high detection of 1.6 aM, which is the highest ever reported by FRET techniques (Lapitan et al., 2019).

Overview of FRET-based DNA detection techniques.

Type of Affinity Assay Techniques/Strategy LOD Analyte Range DLR References
MoS2 Fluorescence/van der Waals force b/w DNA and MoS2 in quenching 0.0039 U/mL 0.0039 U/mL Zhao et al. (2020)
AuNP-H1 probes Fluorescence/Dual signal amplification 47.68 fM 50 fM–100 pM Zhang et al. (2020d)
Copper Nanocluster Fluorescence/was quenched b/w Copper and aptamer 4.8 ng/L/L 0.01–1,000 ug Zhao et al. (2020)
TAE/Mg+2 buffer Fluorescence/isothermal signal amplification 9.8 pM 0.01–10 nM Zhao et al. (2020)
Silica Nanoparticles Fluorescence/polydopamine modified SiO2 as quenchers 1 nM 0–12 nM Zhao et al. (2020)
δ-FeOOH nanosheet Fluorescence/DNA and FeOOH as quenchers 10 pM 0–20 nM Wu et al. (2020a)
Curcumin Encapsulated with F108 hydrogen bonding and dipole interaction between curcumin and F108 increasing FL to 6 times 50 uM 0–100 μM Bechnak et al. (2020)
DNA Tetrahedron Nanoprobe FRET/DNA assisted cyclic amplification 6 pM 10 pM–100 nM Gao et al. (2020a)
Tetrahedral DNA Framework Fluorescence/developed bridge DNA sensors that can capture target DNA 1 fM 0.01 nM–10 nM Li et al. (2020b)
Carbon Nanoparticles Fluorescence/developed DNase I-aided cyclic enzymatic amplification method 3.2 pM 25–100 pM Li et al. (2020d)
Plasmonic gold nanostars SERS/Fluorescence/developed a dual-modal aptamer-based biosensor FL: 0.50 μg/L and SERS: 0.77 μg/L 0.1–50 μg/L Li et al. (2020d)
Poly- nucleotide kinase Fluorescence/isothermal signal amplification 0.1–0.005 U/mL 3 uU/mL Li et al. (2020e)
Cy5/Fluorescein FRET/developed a ratiometric fluorescence method for Four-way Junction 0.12 nM 1–200 nM Liu et al. (2020b)
G-triplex micro beacons/thioflavin Fluorescence/Label-free fluorescence method combined G3-MB with Exo III‒aided DNA recycling amplification 5.6 pg/mL 75–750 nM Liu et al. (2020c)
GO based modified with Cu(II) PL/graphene oxide-based modified platform that boost photoluminescence 4.6 × 10–7 M 0–20 μM Pal et al. (2020)
Thioflavin/ErBr FRET/ThT-fluorescence-based DNA composition studied 1.1 nM 0–4uM Pramanik et al. (2020)
Carbon Dots and Au Nanoparticles Fluorescence/A FQ energy transfer as “spectroscopic rulers” between CDs and AuNPs 1.03 ± 3.54 nM 0.01–200 nM Saad et al. (2020)
Biotinylated sensing probes/magnetic beads Fluorescence/DNA methyltransferase catalyzes and produce strong fluorescent signalssignals 0.002 U/mL 0.01–10 U/mL Liu et al. (2020f)
Au nanoparticles on covalent organic framework nanosheets Fluorescence/Au NPs/COF NSs used as an efficient quencher 75 pM 0.1–10 nM Tian et al. (2020)
Fe3O4 MBs/FL Fluorescence/activation of a hybridization sensor by a magnetic field 2-fold Bakshi et al. (2017), Bakshi et al. (2019)
Fe3O4/SiO2/Graphene FRET/graphene oxide-based FQ sensor. (fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles as donor) 0.12 µM 0–10 µM Balaji et al. (2019)
multicolor QDs open-ring nanoarrays with silver-Plosmonic FRET/Fluorescence enhancement and quenching can be switched that provide platform for DNA detection ∼300 fM 100 fM–1 μM Kannegulla et al., 2018a, Kannegulla et al., 2018b
Plane Silver - 6 nM
MBs/phosphate-Zr4+-carboxylate/Cu(II)Br/EDTA Fluorescence/approach used electron transfer atom transfer radical polymerization with EDTA as the metal ligand 23.8 aM 0.1 fM–1 nM Zhang J et al. (2020)
Cu (I)-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition Fluorescence/Based on controllability and signal amplification by atom transfer radical polymerization 0.22 fM 1 fM–1 nM Zheng et al. (2020)
MoS2, WS2, and GO Fluorescence/fluorescently labeled DNA oligonucleotides were used and their adsorption capacities and kinetics were studied as a function of ionic strength WS2-3nM, MoS2-1.5 nM, GO-2nM 1–50 nM Lu et al. (2017)
Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads/Liposome/carboxyfluorescein Fluorescent/carboxyfluorescein-loaded liposomes as signal amplification systems strategy for detection of DNA sequence 1 nM 1 × 10−10–6×10-10 M Sforzi et al. (2020)
PDMS chip and a glass substrate Microfluidic Fluorescence/Microfluidic Exponential Rolling Circle Amplification platform 5–8 (zeptomole) 2 × 106 (exosomes) 50 zmol to 5 fmol Cao et al. (2019)
Polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic device Microfluidic fluorescence/Develop An ion concentration polarization based electrokinetic concentration device 1 nM (DNA) Cheung et al. (2018)
25 nM (RMNA)
Microfluidic chip/microbead/Microfluidic fluorescence/developed a rapidly adaptable platform to assess biomarkers using a microfluidic technology 0.5 ng/μL (chip), 0.1 ng/μL (multiwell plate) 0.2 ng/μL–100 ng/μL Dinter et al. (2019)
Poly-L-Lysine Microfluidic chip/ fluorescence Proposed PLL substrate on with microfluidic chips for detection of DNA based on three-segment hybridizationhybridization 1 pM/30 min 10−7M to 10−12 M Gao et al. (2020b)
LOC for free-flow electrophoretic/ Fluorescence/demonstrate DNA amplification by microfluidic method from dilute specimens 1 PFU/mL 5–500 µL Hügle et al. (2020)
Fe3O4@PDA NPs by Ca2+ FRET/developed FRET-based biosensor for determination of microRNA-167 using CDs as donor and Fe3O4@PDA NPs as acceptor 76 pM 0.5–100 nM Cao et al. (2020)
Iron oxide nanocubes microfluidic Flow cytometry/Designed a new kind of superparamagnetic nanobeacon for mRNA detection and regulation in living cells 9.6-fold 54 nM Chen et al. (2019)
Magnetic nanoparticle/poly-enzyme nanobead/FL Detection target DNA by combining magnetic nanoparticle capture and poly-enzyme nanobead signal amplification 1.6 aM 1 aM–1 pM Lapitan et al. (2019)
2.2.1.2 Surface plasmon resonance-based DNA sensors (SPRs)

It is one of the most common optical sensing techniques which is based on surface plasmon which are electromagnetic waves originating from the metal interface. In this sensor, the incident light stimulates the resonance of the conduction electrons at the interface of the positive and negative permittivity materials. AuNPs with positive charge conjugate with the target DNA that is negatively charged; light stimulus resonance phenomena occur between them using conduction electrons, and there is a change in dielectric constants that generate surface plasmons. The schematic diagram shows the detection method by SPR, where the prism, transducer surface composed of nanomaterials, plane polarized light as a stimulus, and detector are the main components of the SPR system. During the conversion of the association phase to the disassociation phase, the refractive index changes, which ultimately deviate from the exiting light from the prism, are correlated with the concentration of the analyte, as shown in Figure 5. Specifically, Figure 5 represents the experimental illustration of SPR techniques (A) and a variation in the critical angle as a function of the intensity (B) and the response of the sensor during the experiment. This method offers label-free techniques; however, there is variation in the refractive index owing to changes in the transducer surface temperature and composition, which may significantly alter the detection results (Patching, 2014).

(A) Schematic of SPR-based DNA sensing technique for measuring the binding of an analyte molecule (B) varation in critical angle as fuction of intensity of incident light, (C) Evolution of sonogram's response during SPR experiment (Patching, 2014).

The SPR detection performs the analysis of biomolecular interaction ranging from organic compounds to proteins and nucleic acids and viruses based on real-time. The detection is non-invasive. i.e., it can analyze transparent or colored samples effectively. They are a label-free, specific, and sensitive method that is dependent on the changes in the refractive index of the material surface. A small change in the refractive index may induce a false signal during the detection of an analyte. Nanomaterials are the most ideal material for their fabrication and better signal detection and amplification. Most importantly they are available commercially (Deng et al., 2017; Das et al., 2021).

An overview of the various SPR-based DNA detection techniques reported recently is displayed in Table 2. We have listed all possible information, for example, the type of materials, techniques, and strategy of DNA detection used, limit of detection, and range of analyte concentration. Therefore, by employing a sandwich-like assay based on the selective capture of specific DNA targets, subsequent signal amplification can be obtained by a secondary DNA probe linked to Au nanostars with a detection limit of 3 fM to 6.9 aM (Mariani et al., 2015). Another study reported that a highly sensitive polarization control-modulated plasmonic biosensor based on monolayer graphene with Au film π -staking achieved a detection limit of 500 aM (Sun et al., 2019b), which is the highest ever reported for SPR techniques. Table 2 summarizes the findings based on the SPR-DNA sensor reported previously.

SPRs based DNA detection techniques.

Type of Affinity Assay Determination Method LOD Analyte Range DLR References
Silica core/gold nanowires SPR/a novel design of a highly sensitive surface plasmon photonic crystal fiber biosensor for DNA hybridization detection is presented 5.53–6.82 RIU-1 94.59 nm/RIU Azab et al. (2018)
Au/SiO2/H2O/L inker SPR/A highly sensitive hybrid plasmonic slot-waveguide biosensor based on silicon-on-insulator is proposed which record change in the analyte refractive index 2.65 × 10−6 RIU 1890.4 nm/RIU Hameed et al. (2017)
Biotinylated thiolated DNA molecular beacon (MB)/streptavidin functionalized gold nanorods SPR/strategy by applying biotinylated thiolated molecular beacon (MB) interfacial gene probe and a strepavidinylated GNR (Stre-GNR) for the enhanced SPR response to realize rapid and sensitive miRNA detection is demonstrated 0.045 pM 0–2 nM Hao et al. (2017)
Nanobowled Aluminum/Au NPs LSPR/fabricated ordered gold nanoparticle arrangements on epoxy substrates is presented 5 nM 1–1,000 nM Lednický and Bonyár (2020)
Gold nanostar (AuNS)/SPR SPRi/Designed sandwich-like assay based on the selective capturing of specific DNA targets and the subsequent signal amplification by a secondary DNA probe linked to AuNS 3.0 fM (without NSs) 6.9 aM (with NSs) 6.1 nM–10 pM (without NSs) Mariani et al. (2015)
1.5 fM–10 aM (with NSs)
3D gold nanostructure with Au deposition LSPR of gold nanoparticles is sensitive to the dielectric constant of the surrounding environment 1–500 nM 13 fM Na et al. (2018)
Au nanoparticles LSPR peak is sensitive only to the refractive index of the close surrounding environment 430 nm/RIU 0–100 nM Qi and Bi (2019)
Graphene/Au NPs SPR/Sensitive polarization control-modulated plasmonic biosensor based on monolayer graphene at gold film- π -staking interaction 500 aM 10−15 to 10−7 M Sun et al. (2019b)
Gold nanorods Using LSPR/establish a method that can discriminate between the mutant and the wild-type sequence of the gene using gold nanorods in solution 2 ng/mL 0–125 ng/mL Tadimety et al. (2019)
Inverted-bowtie nanoapertures SPR/show simultaneous ionic-current and optical-transmission-based detection of DNA 100 nm Verschueren et al. (2019)
Dual Gold Nanoparticles SPR/Dual nanoparticle amplification was achieved by controlled hybridization attachment of AuNPs resulting from electronic coupling between the Au film and AuNPs, as well as coupling effects in plasmonic nanostructures 5 × 103 exosomes/mL 106–109 exosomes/mL Wang et al. (2019b)
Gold NPs LSPR/AuNPs bind with DNA, this binding changes the local refractive index, which is detected spectroscopically as the resulting changes of the LSPR peak wavelength 60 nM 0–31 nM Zopf et al. (2019)
Silicon dioxide Microfluidic LSPR/developed a label-free microfluidic biosensor platform to detect the interaction of DNA with the DNA polymerase enzyme, to monitor the formation of Self-assembled-monolayers of ssDNA 54 ± 6 nm/RIU 0.0625 U/mL Roether et al. (2019)
2.2.1.3 Colorimetric-based DNA sensors (CMs)

In this technique, color tags or enzymes are used for the detection of DNA compatible with the substrate. Alternatively, nucleic acids functionalized with nanomaterial-based assays can be used for the detection and quantification of DNA (Krishnan and Syed, 2022). During colorimetric analysis, colloidal solution gold nanoparticles (GNPs) exhibit different colors based on their distance from red to blue. The detection is done through a change in the wavelength of the electrolyzed DNA. The color of GNPs is dependent on their dispersion and this help researchers to visually investigate assays that change owing to a decrease in the average distance between nanomaterials (Li and Rothberg, 2004). This method is straightforward, low-cost, and easy to perform for rapid onsite diagnostics. They have a poor limit of detection and prototype design. This DNA detection equipment is commercially available and more economical than other clinical diagnostics. Figure 6 displays schematic illustration of calorimeter based on the GNPs dispersion and aggregation (Liu et al., 2013). A series of DNA samples were electrolyzed and had different concentrations up to 6Nm. The color of the GNPs is gradually changing from pale to blue with the addition of concentration. The wavelength of absorption spectrum is in the range of 550–750 nm. This method is designed to detect a DNA sequence.

(A) Calorimetric response of concentration of DNA (0-6 nM), (B) absorption spectrum as a function of wavelength of electrolyzed DNA (Liu et al.,2013).

An overview of the various colorimetric DNA detection techniques recently reported is listed in Table 3. We summarized the types of materials used, techniques and strategies of DNA detection, limit of detection, and range of analyte concentration. Therefore, by employing electrophoretic streptavidin-coated MBs assisted with a magnetic field, we could introduce a new method, which uses active hybridization with a detection limit of 0.1 fM (Tian et al., 2019). Another report showed that Fe3O4 nanosheets in DNA/Fe3O4 networks display peroxidase-like catalytic activity, thereby enhancing detection to an extreme limit of 13 aM, which is the highest limit that has been reported for colorimetric techniques (Tang et al., 2019).

Colorimetric-based DNA detection techniques.

Type of affinity assay Determination method LOD DLR References (s)
2D DNA/Fe3O4 nanosheet Colorimetry/Fe3O4 nanosheets in the DNA/Fe3O4 networks display peroxidase-like catalytic activity thereby enhancing detection 13 aM 0.05 fM–12 nM Tang et al. (2019)
Fe2O3 porous particles Calorimetric/DNA is detected using the peroxidase-like activity of a composite nanozyme synthesized in the form of porous particles 1.1 nM 0.0–21.5 nM Dinter et al. (2019)
Magnetic microbeads/ nanoparticles Optomagnetic/isothermal amplification technique 4 and 20 pM 1–100 pM Minero et al. (2019)
Magnetic microbeads Optomagnetic/isothermal nucleic acid amplification 4 pM 2–40 pM Minero et al. (2020)
Iron oxide nanoparticles Optomagnetic/giant magnetoresistive effect p = 0.05 Ng et al. (2019)
Streptavidin-coated MBs/electrophoresis Electrophoretic assisted with magnetic field/multiplex microarray-based assay/new method of active hybridization analysis 0.1 fM 0.1 nM Shlyapnikov et al. (2019)
Magnetic nanoparticle-graphene oxide Optomagnetic/isothermal nucleic acid amplification triggered by the hybridization and padlock probes 2 pM 1–4 pM Tian et al. (2019)
Gold nanoparticles probe Plasma mass spectrometry detection/Au NPs amplification and isothermal circular strand-displacement polymerization reaction 8.9 fM 0.1–10000 pM Xiao et al. (2019)
Silicon master/Microfluidic Microfluidic recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) sensor 10 copies/μL 10–106 copies/μL Yang et al. (2019)
Peptide Nucleic Acid PNA-DNA2 triple-helix molecular switch and DiSC2 0.18 nM 0–2 μM Xu et al. (2020a)
2.2.1.4 Surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based DNA sensors (SERSs)

In this technique, molecular vibrations which arise directly from analyte molecules were measured using Raman spectroscopy. Such types of resonance occur only when the target analyte is a nanostructure or a roughed metal surface. SERS sensing is based on the conjugation of nanomaterials and bioreceptor molecules (oligonucleotides) at the surface of a dye known as a Raman reporter or tag that enhances Raman signals during the detection of target DNA. SERS provides an enhanced Raman signal of 106–1014 order of magnitude owing to the electromagnetic interaction between the metal.

Nanostructures and the analyte. SERS-based biosensors have a comparatively low cost, high sensitivity, rapid results, and portability (Vikrant et al., 2019). Figure 7 shows the schematic setup for the detection of DNA based on AgNPs at the Si substrate as a sandwich-type sensing setup. Nanoparticles are functionalized with thiolated DNA as step 1, followed by conjugation of dye named Rhodamine as step 2. Therefore, a sandwich-like structure surrounded the target DNA by thiolated DNA and reported DNA that ultimately caused the formation of capture/target/reporter DNA ready for SERS detection as step 3, as shown in Figure 7. The optical sensors are summarized in Figure 8. Each optical sensor has been summarized in the flow chart.

Schematic of the fabrication route for SERS sensor and variation of Raman shift as a function of intensity (Jiang et al., 2012).

Division of optical sensors (Vikrant et al., 2019).

An overview of the various SERS-based DNA detection techniques reported recently is listed in Table 4. It contains the complete information type of materials used, techniques, a strategy of DNA detection, limit of detection, and range of analyte concentration. Thus, a detection limit of 10 uM–10 fM can be achieved by AuNPs on the surface of graphene oxide (GO) linking via hybridization (Khalil et al., 2019). He et al. (2019) reported a novel detection ratiometric sensor based on glucose oxidase (GOx) on Au and Si nanoflower substrates that enhances the detection to an extreme limit of 7.75 aM, which is the highest limit for colorimetric techniques. Table 4 lists earlier studies on SERS-based DNA sensors.

SERS-based DNA detection techniques.

Type of affinity assay Determination method LOD DLR References(s)
DNA Probe-conjugated AuNPs SERS/Salivary biomarkers S100 calcium binding protein p (S100 P) mRNA in saliva is a potential biomarker 3 nM 0–200 nM Han et al. (2018b)
Au NPs probe SERS/Colorimetry/developed dual-mode Au NPs probe 1 cell 100–106 cells mL-1 Feng et al. (2019)
Ag NPS/SERS SERS/The simple strategy relies on the electrostatic adhesion of DNA/RNA onto positively charged silver colloids thus providing realistic direct information of the nucleic acid 1 pg μ/L Guerrini et al. (2016)
Polyadenine/AuNS SERS/Developed a method for the modulation of DNA conformation from the “Lie-Down” to the “Stand-Up” conformation on a AuNS surface by adjusting the length of tip-assembled polyA grafted to the DNA sequence 45.7 pM 0.1–500 nM Guo et al. (2017)
Silver nanoparticles and Graphene oxide-based biochips SERS/Laser scribing method to fabricate biochips as a reusable sensor 10−5–0−10 M 10−10 M Han et al. (2018a)
Au NPs were conjugated with oligonucleotides SERS/Developed SERS-based vertical flow assay biosensor 0.01–200 nM 1.1–10 nM Han et al. (2019)
Glucose oxidase (Gox) on Au & Si nanoflowers substrate SERS/fabricated ratiometric sensor with only one Raman probe based on cascade catalytic reaction 7.75 aM 10 aM–100 pM He et al. (2019)
DNA on the AgNPs@Si SERS/AgNPs@Si based substrates for sensitive,specific,andmultiplexDNA detection 1 pM–100 nm 1 pM Jiang et al. (2012)
GO-Au NPs/Raman dye SERS/detection is based on the covalent linking of the two platforms [GO-AuNPs with probe 1 and AuNPs with probe 2 and Raman dye (Cy3) ] via hybridization 10 µM–10 fM 10 fM Khalil et al. (2019)
Metal–organic framework coated Ag-NOF Sensor SERS/reported that a MOF enables an Ag nanowire SERS platform to be corrosion resistant 1 nM
Au–Ag bimetallic nanodendrites Demonstrated SERS-based sensor that utilizes the toehold-mediated DNA displacement reaction as a target-capturing scheme 200 fM–20 nM 96.3 fM Hyejeong Jang (2019)
GaN/Au Substrate/SERS SERS/Detection of gene mutation-using highly active and reproducible substrate (photo-etched GaN covered with a thin layer of sputtered gold) 6.75 pg μ/L −67.5 ng μ/L 1 pg μ/L Kowalczyk et al. (2019)
R6G + AgAu alloy + silicon microbead SERS/proposed strategy by combining stable SERS reporter element and duplex-specific assisted signal amplification for quantitative detection 12 fM–18 pM 5 fM Ma et al. (2018)
PDMS chips integrating silver-coated porous silicon membranes SERS/metal–dielectric nanostructures were functionalized with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of mRNA. 25–1 nM 0.55–1.51 nM Novara et al. (2017)
Graphene-Ag array SERS/developed graphene-Ag array for the detection of methylated DNA and its oxidation derivatives 200 pg genomic DNA 1.8 pmol/L Ouyang et al. (2017)
DNA hydrogel/SERS SERS developed a novel sensor array with nine sensor units that can detect multiple miRNAs in one sample based on a target miRNA-responsive DNA hydrogel 4–1,200 nM 0.11 nM Si et al. (2020)
Silver-coated gold nanostar SERS/in vivo detection of nucleic acid involving the “inverse molecular sentinel” detection scheme using plasmonics-active nanostars 5 nM Wang et al. (2018a)
Co/Au NPs SERS/PCR/based new platform was proposed and evaluated its performance by sequentially measuring the Raman signals of DNA after the completion of different thermocycling numbers 0.1–1,000 pM 960 nM Wu et al. (2020b)
Melamine resin/Ag/SiO2 nanoparticles SERS/FL/dual-mode spectroscopic encoded microspheres system based on the combination of FL and SERS spectra encoding was designed for specific DNA detection 100 uL You et al. (2017)
10–10 mol/L
Silica-coated/AuNPs, and Au-coated NPs with DNA probes SERS/developed a magnetic-capture-based SERS assay for the simultaneous detection of multiple nucleic basis 120 fM 120–450 pM Zhang et al. (2019a)
Tetracationic Bis-triarylborane SER/designed new derivatives to investigate the influence of the linker type on DNA/RNA/protein interactions by fluorimetric titration 10 nM 0.5 nM–0.005 nM Amini et al. (2020)
2.2.2 Electrochemical sensors (ECs) 2.2.2.1 Electro-chemiluminescence based DNA sensors (ECLs)

In this technique, chemical luminescence and electrochemical processes are combined and named as electro-chemiluminescence (ECL), which results in the emission of light. This photo emission occurs owing to the excitation and de-excitation of electrons between the ground and excited states stimulated by the electrochemical reaction in solution. Light is emitted because of the transfer of exergonic electrons at the electrode surface. This phenomenon is also known as electrogenerated chemical luminescence. The wavelength of the light emitted from the excited and relaxed states corresponds to the energy gap of the molecules. ssDNA is commonly used as a bioreceptor and printed screen, and pencil graphite glassy carbon, and gold are used as the working electrodes in the assembly of DNA sensors. Figure 9 shows the simple strategy and mechanism of detection. This design comprises a target DNA fragment that hybridizes with MBs, where streptadivine and biotin are used as linkers, and the ruthenium probe is conjugated at the other end (Figure 9A). This magnetic bead-assisted ECL reaction occurs in the presence of tripropylamine, where the ruthenium probe Ru (bpy)3 2+ amplifies the signal isothermally (Zhou et al., 2014).

(A) Schematic illustration of magnetic based (MB) ECL for hepatitis B antigen model and nucleic acid target ,whereas antibody of nucleic acids are labeled with biotin and Ru(bpy), (B) MB based ECL measurement and detection system (Zhou et al. 2014).

Table 5 presents an overview of the various ECL-based DNA detection techniques reported in the last decade. Herein, we summarize the detection limit of 19.05 aM for biosensor based on the in situ generation of Cu nanoclusters as luminophores and TiO2 as a coreaction accelerator (Liao et al., 2018). Zhang et al. (2020e) constructed MXene (Ti3C2Tx)-based impedimetric aptasensing nanosheets and iron phthalocyanine quantum dots for an enhanced high detection sensitivity of up to 4.3 aM as compared to the individual component-based ECL technique.

ECL-based DNA detection techniques.

Type of affinity assay Determination method LOD DLR Ref (s)
AuNPs/Polyamidine/CuInZnS QDs SPR/ECL/demonstrated novel SPR enhanced ECL. PDA control the separation length and enhanced ECL response, potential charge transfer and ECL quenching- P55 gene detection 0.03 nm/L 1–15 nM/L Liu et al. (2018)
CdS nanocrystals and gold nanoparticles ECL/we firstly enunciated the presence of synergy effect between the electron and energy transfer in an ECL system involving the CdS NCs and Au NPs for detection of the DNA binding protein 5pM 0.015–150 nM Wang et al. (2013)
MoS2 nanosheets/sulfur doped boron nitrogen QDs ECL/Demonstrated distance-dependent plasmon-enhanced ECL in detail with different length DNA chains 0.17 pmol/L 0.5 pM–1 nM Liu et al. (2020e)
Peptide nucleic acid/core-shell Fe3O4-Au nanoparticles/ EC/miRNA sensing strategy based on the specific affinity using Fe3O4–Au–PNA probe as a new carrier in a solid-state nanopore 10 nM 2 nM–50 nM Wang et al. (2019a)
Gold disk electrode/piranha solution EC/Demonstrated signal amplification strategy based on copper-free click chemistry-mediated cyclic ligation of DNA 7.7 fM 25 fM–100 pM Bi et al. (2020)
Screen printed carbon electrodes/RGO EC/Investigated the influence exerted by the concentration of GO dispersion as a modifier for screen printed carbon electrodes on the fabrication of an EC biosensor to detect DNA hybridization 100 nM 10 nm to 10 µM Chiticaru et al. (2019)
PDA + compounds/N, N-bis (2-(trimethylammoniumiodide) (propylene perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxyldiimide (PDA+) PEC/EC dual-mode biosensor with cationic decorated multifunctional DNA spheres in situ generated on electrode was proposed for sensitive and accurate detection of mRNA 0.37 fM/PEC 0.1 fM–1 nM (for PEC) Deng et al. (2020)
0.67 fM/EC 2 Fm–500 pM (for EC)
Ti3C2Tx@FePc QDs Electrochemical/construct a novel ultrasensitive impedimetric aptasensing system 4.3 aM 0.01 fM −10 pM Zhang et al. (2020e)
Ga2Te3-based QD/Cs+/Li+/ EC/In this study a Ga2Te3-based QD genosensor together with metal ions was developed 0.4 pg/mL 0.1–1 ng/mL Fuku et al. (2020)
Antimonene/functionalized with an oligonucleotide/AuE SPE/electrochemical/demonstrated that antimonene interacts non-covalently but strongly with oligonucleotides 28.3 pg/uL 0–25 ng/uL García-Mendiola et al. (2020)
AuE/exosome/Probe DNA/hpDNA EC/DPV- herein a sensitive hybridization chain reaction electrochemical assay was fabricated for the detection of exosomal microRNA-122 53 aM 0.1 fM to 0.1 μM Guo et al. (2020)
Carbon Nanotube-Gold Nanoparticle Nanoclusters/ Electrochemical/biosensor combine the synergistic properties of both CNTs and AuNPs, as a promising signal amplification strategy for DNA detection 5.2 fM 0.1 pM–10 nM Han et al. (2020)
AuE/Alumina Slurry Electrochemical/proposed biosensor based on nest hybridization chain reaction initiated by the hybridization of two dumbbell-shaped DNA units 3 pM 5 pM–0.5 nM Huang et al. (2020)
Poly o-cresophthalein complexone film/Glossy Carbon Electrode EC/fabricated POCF modified electrode was and used as a sensor for the simultaneous detection of adenine and guanine as oxidation peak currents 0.02 μM 0.08 μM–200 μM Jayadevimanoranjitham and Narayanan (2020)
Gold E/8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine EC/Introduced triple signal amplification strategies were introduced to enhance the sensitivity of 8-OhdG 24.34 fM 100 fM–10 nM Jia et al. (2020)
CdTe QDs Carbon ink and solid wax/electrochemical EC cloth-based DNA sensors are developed based on Carbon ink- and solid wax 8.74 fM 20 fM to 5 nM Jiang et al. (2020a)
SiO2/AuNPs) barcode/gold label silver EC/method based on bio-barcode/gold label silver stain dual amplification is presented 0.23 fM 1 fM–10 pM Jiang et al. (2020b)
Nanowires of polypyrrole EC demonstrate the potential of nanostructured polypyrrole formed by template free as platform for amperometric detection of DNA 0.36 aM 1 aM–100 fM Khoder and Korri-Youssoufi (2020)
Cu–Ni@N, B rGO (GO) EC/Demonstrated electrocatalytic performance of Cu–Ni@N,B rGO toward guanine (G) and adenine (A) oxidation 0.118 μM 1–160 μM Lei et al. (2020)
Carboxylate-Zr4+-phosphate/AgNPs EC/proposed detection based on electrochemically mediated atom transfer radical polymerization and surface-initiated reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization cascade polymerization and AgNPs deposition 0.487 aM 1 aM–10 pM Li et al. (2020c)
Cu NCs/TiO2/ECL ECL/biosensor based on in situ generation of Cu NCs as luminophore and TiO2 as coreaction accelerator 19.05 aM 100 aM–100 pM Wang et al. (2019a)
PFO polymer dots/ECL ECL-based biosensor demonstrate OH -dependent ECL emission characteristic that detect mRNA 12.2 aM 50 aM–1.0 nM Liu et al. (2020a)
Ferrocene/Au electrodes/Al2O3/electrochemical/DPV ECL/sensing strategy utilizing cooperative proximity hybridization based on a G-quadruplex probe labeled with the thiol 2.82 × 10−15M 1 nM–1 fM Liu et al. (2020d)
PolyA-ODNs/Rolling Motor/GTD/Electrochemical 3D-ECL/Demonstrated DNA probe bridge act as catalytic center during sensing 0.17 nM 0.5 nM–1.5 μM (Z.Liu et al., 2020)
Peptide nucleic acid/poly-L-lysine/ethyl glycol/dibenzocyclooctyne/Quartz Crystal Microbalance ECL/presented the potential gain in sensitivity by the application of azido-PNA probes clicked to a PLL-OEG-DBCO adhesion layer adsorbed on Si-micropillar substrates at various pitches (9.0 ± 0.2) pmol/cm2 Movilli et al. (2020)
10.6 factor
GO-wrapped Au nanostars/glossy Carbon electrodes EC-DPV/sensing platform inspired by a functional “green” electrochemical reduction pathway 1 × 10−20 M 1 × 10−20 M-1x10−12 M Rahman et al. (2020)
Trivalent Mg2+ dependent DNAzymes Electrochemical Detection based on formation of trivalent DNAzyme junctions through a target-initiated catalytic hairpin assembly approach 0.46 fM 1 fM to 1 nM Ren et al. (2020)
Capture Probe mercaptohexanol/hexanedithio monolayer Electrochemical/designed genosensor based on mixed-self-assembled monolayers as DNA inmobilization system 10 nM 5·10–10 to 5·10–8 M Sánchez-Paniagua et al. (2020)
CdTe QDs/Methylene blue-labeled aptamer EC/PEC/proposed a ratiometric aptasensing strategy based on the dual-detection model with a PEC “signal-on” and an EC “signal-off” 10 nM 0.03–100 μM Shen Z et al. (2020)
Nitrogen-doped reduced GO/glassy carbon electrode Electrochemical/based on N-RGO/GCE sensor demonstrated electrochemical response toward the oxidation of guanineguanine 1.38 × 10−7 M 4.14 × 10−7–3.71 × 10−4M Song et al. (2020a)
pencil graphite electrodes EC/presented enzyme-linked DNA hybridization assay using PeGE to detect target DNA sequences in DNA fragments amplified by PCR 40 fM 0–50 ng/uL Špaček et al. (2020)
Ti working electrode with electrodeposited Au nanostructures EC (DPV) reported on-chip biosensor of DNA hybridization using Au NCs working electrodes 0.97 fM 10 fM–1 µM Tripathy et al. (2019)
Nanoparticle gold ink on planar substrates Cyclic Olefin Copolymer (COC) Electrochemical/Designed inkjet-printing of Au NPs at planar substrates of cyclic olefin copolymer as hybridization signal probe 60-fold higher Trotter (2020)
Copper-based metal–organic framework/graphene nanocomposite/GCE Electrochemical/DPV/Designed Cu-MOF/ERGO/GCE electrode for the detection of guanine and adenine in real samples 0.02–10 µM 0.005–20 µM 20–100 µM (for guanine) Wang et al. (2020)
40–200 µM (for adenine)
Beacons ferrocene (Fc)-A1/methylene blue -A2 Electrochemical/Designed DNA circle capture probe with multiple target recognition domains was anchored at the top of tetrahedron DNA nanostructure miRNA-21–18.9 aM and miRNA-155–39.6 aM 0.1 fM–10 nM Xu et al. (2020b)
Ferrocene/graphene Electrochemical/developed a novel tetraferrocene used as homogeneous sensor probe label that provide a greater signaling potential 8.2 fM 20 fM–2 nM Yin et al. (2020)
Hairpin DNAN Electrochemical/developed a novel sensor via target-induced Cas12a cleaving interfacial hpDNA 30 pM 50 Pm–100 nM Zhang Y et al. (2020)
Naphthyl phosphate. Dithiothreitol, dimethylamino propyl carbodiimide Electrochemical a new electrochemical mmune-DNA sensing platform for DNA Mtase activity assay and inhibitor screening by catalysis-based signal amplification 0.039 Um/L 0.05–10 U m/L Yin et al. (2020)
Nanonets of GO/Fe3O4/β-CD/PAMAM-avidin-ALP Electrochemical DNA detection by using host-guest nanonets of GO/Fe3O4/β-CD NCs as Ab platform and PAMAM-avidin-ALP as signal amplification due to electron transfer 3.2 pM 0.01–50 nM Zhou et al. (2019)
Gold coated magnetic nanospheres Electrochemical/Develop 3D magnetic DNA nanospheres were synthesized and immobilized on a gold stir-bar as encoded probes for miRNA capture and signal amplification 1.5 fM 5 fM–2 nM Shen X et al. (2020)
Rethenium tris-(bipyridine)/ECL ECL/developed sensor for 8-oxodGuo activity assay using spermine conjugated ruthenium tris-(bipyridine) derivative (spermine-Ru) 1 lesion in 500 DNA bases 0–4 U/uL Shen Z et al. (2020)
Gold Nanocluster-H2O2 system ECL/based sensor was fabricated for the quantification of 5 mC, TET1 protein and β-GT activities, as well as inhibitor screening, based on the interaction of chemically excited AuNCs with H2O2 3.46 pM 0.01 Nm–50 nM Jiang et al. (2018)
2.2.2.2 Microfluidic/PCR chip-based DNA sensors (MFCs)

Lab-on-a-chip (LOC) is a mini-integrated chip with small sensors in an array with an area of a few square centimeters. They are based on the micro-electrical-mechanical-based technology (MEMS) in the form of an integrated chip. These sensors are composed of a network of microfluidic channels in which the analyte can be manipulated at the microscale level. The compact design of microfluidic chips results in rapid heating and mixing; hence, providing ultrahigh sensitivity and portability for direct analysis of a crime scene (Temiz et al., 2015; Bruijns et al., 2016). This will also decrease the amount of analyte as well as reduces cross-contamination in the sealed environment. These systems are designed for single use, which will benefit from the chain of custody and contamination risk. A bandage-like flexible sensor that amplifies the DNA detection signal using microfluidic technology is shown in Figure 10. These sensors can be powered by body heat; thus, they are highly sensitive and portable for on-site detection (Bruijns et al., 2016). They are widely used for DNA amplification process and accelerate PCR process. They are small in dimension and instant detection and cost-effective instrument.

Schematic of the wearable microfluidic sensor for nucleic acids (Temiz et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2019).

An overview of the various microfluidic chip-based DNA detection techniques reported earlier is listed in Table 6. We can observe that biosensors based on microfluidic chips are designed as power-free chips. They follow the amplification of fluorescence signals after hybridization with laminar flow-assisted dendritic cells and have a detection limit of 0.045–0.45 pM (Kim et al., 2019). Microfluidic-based nucleic acid amplification tests as noise resistant quantitative PCR are used for rapid detection of ultralow-abundance DNA in real biofluids. They have the highest diagnostic limits of 0.05 aM to be reported for a microfluidic technique (Ye and De, 2017).

Chip-based microfluidic DNA sensor detection techniques.

Type of affinity assay Determination method LOD DLR Ref (s)
Glass substrate/Negative photoresist/Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Microfluidics/Fabrication of microfluidics structure-based polydimethylsiloxane biopolymer on a glass substrate with SU-8 photoresist for label-free detection DNA 260–280 nm absorbance 0.000005 A difference at 1.0 V after hybridization Ayoib et al. (2020)
CMOS sensor for imaging Microfluidic/Presented centrifugation assisted precipitation method for single-step DNA quantification 10Mng/uL 10–100Mng/uL Banerjee et al. (2019)
Agarose gel electrophoresis/PCR Microfluidic/PCR/designed 3D-printed microfluidic chip was and fabricated for droplet-based PCR detection of mRNA normalized intensity-0.82–0.92 Jiao et al. (2019)
Ion concentration polarization Microfluidic Electrokinetic/Sensitive detection of nucleic acids via hybridization on a microarray 1 nM 0.1–100 nM Kim et al. (2020)
PDMS Microfluidic Chip/Designed Power-free Chip in which amplification of Fluorescence signals after hybridization by laminar flow-assisted dendritic 0.045–0.45 pM 1 fM–10 pM Kim et al. (2019)
PDMS/Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) Flexible microfluidic chip/developed a wearable microfluidic device combined with RPA for simple and rapid amplification of DNA using human body heat 100 copies/mL in 24 min 10–105 copies/mL Kong et al. (2019)
PDMS/Polyethylene (PE) Microfluidic PCR/propose a bubble-free microfluidic PCR device via controlled fluid transfer 47 copies/single PCR in <3 min 250–1,000 nM Lee et al. (2019)
Laser diode/PMMA Microfluidic/Proposed Disposal disc based on a double rotation axes centrifugal microfluidic platform 100 copies/mL 0–500 μL Li et al. (2019a)
PDMS Microfluidic PCR/proposed hierarchical selective electro kinetic concentration PCR as noise resistant quantitative PCR for rapid detection of ultralow-abundance DNA in real biofluids 0.05 aM 0–150 mL Ye and De (2017)
Cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) Microfluidic/based combination of online dynamic magnetic extraction procedure with droplet-based digital PCR 15.45 ng/mL 10–100 ng/mL Perez-Toralla et al. (2019)
COC Microfluidic/RNA was hybridized with capture probes on the reaction chamber surface and identification was achieved by detection of fluorescence tags 757.86 fM 10-1-10−5 pM Prada et al. (2019)
Polycarbonate/lithium niobate Microfluidic chip/based on non-equilibrium ionic currents and detects the presence of negative charge on target molecules 1 pM 0.001–1 nM Ramshani et al. (2019)
Graphene Oxide (Gox)/Fluorimetric Fluorimetric-Paired-Emitter-Detector-Diode based on GO high affinity toward single-stranded DNA and its ability to quench the fluorescence 0.625 uM 0.625–2.5 uM Ziółkowski et al. (2020)
Au/Fe3O4 NPs/Polydopamine based microbeads Flow cytometry/Synthesizes Au NPs decorated magnetic MBs exhibit fluorescence signal of each MBs could be collected individually, realizing single MBs-based DNA imaging 0.1 nM 0.2–20 nM Li et al. (2020a)
2.2.2.3 FET-based DNA sensors

FET biosensors are highly sensitive detectors based on 2D materials. They have high carrier mobility owing to their nanoscale dimensions and high volume-to-charge ratio. MXene-based biosensors are a combination of metal carbides and nitrides that have attracted attention because of their unique characteristics (Babar et al., 2022; Guo et al., 2011). They are used for analyte detection and biosensing applications (Yadav et al., 2021). A combination of MXene-graphene-based FET has been used to detect influenza and 2019-Ncov (Li et al., 2021). A multiscale computer simulation method and experimental approach were employed to investigate the characteristics of flat and crumpled graphene-based biosensors by Hwang et al. (2020) ,who found that the detection limits of buffer and human samples are 600 aM and 20 aM, respectively. Furthermore, the atomic-scale simulation results revealed that the deformation mechanism resulted in electrical hotspots in the channel. This technique can be used to develop reliable fast-track biosensors for medical applications. Figure 11 displays a cross-sectional representation of flat and crumpled graphene FET sensors over a Debye length, represented by the blue curve (Figure 11A), whereas Figure 11B shows the fabrication route. Debye screening is weaker in crumpled graphene, which makes it more sensitive for detecting DNA (Hwang et al., 2020). The insets show the distribution of energy over the K-space.

(A) Scheme of flat and crumpled graphene FET biosensor using single and double DNA strands over graphene surface. (B) Experimental route for fabrication and flow proces.

A computational study on single-layer MXene that has potential applications as a DNA detection material with high sensitivity and effectiveness was conducted (Yadav et al., 2021). Computer simulation methods have frequently been used to understand the mechanisms and interactions of materials at the atomic scale (Mustafa et al., 2017; Azeem et al., 2018a; Azeem et al., 2018b; Azeem et al., 2019b; Azeem et al., 2019a; Azeem et al., 2020; Azeem et al., 2021; Mustafa Azeem et al., 2018; Mustafa Azeem et al., 2019). An overview of the various FET-based DNA detection techniques reported earlier is listed in Table 7. It is important to point here that LD material has displayed clear advantage on other materials used for designing sensors for health application because of their tunable band structure and ultrathin nature. They also display an improved detection sensitivity. LD materials have been emerged as promising candidate for health industry. Figure 12 summarize LD materials and their application in sensing applications. The division is based on the synthesis, preparation methods, electrochemical and optical properties. The fabrication process of these materials involves process of exfoliation that depends on the chemical environment. Moreover, intercalation constitute chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and electrochemical exfoliation. The material based on LD sensors are used in theranostics image guide application and diagnostics (Bolotsky et al., 2019).

FET-based DNA detectors.

Type of affinity assay Determination method LOD DLR Ref
Silicon nitride on SiO2 Substrate Ion-Sensitive FET/CMOS chemical sensing array operating in current mode for real-time ion imaging and detection of DNA amplification by Isothermal Loop-Mediated 1.03 μA/pH Miscourides et al. (2018)
Graphene layer on SiO2/Si Substrate FET/based on two-dimensional channel of a single graphene layer that can discriminate a single nucleotide polymorphism 25 aM 1 Am–100 fM Campos et al. (2019)
ISFET chemical frame/Bio Chip Ion-Sensitive FET/DNA amplification generates protons H+ proportional to the number of DNA copies by isothermal amplification 16.7 mpH 1–12 pH Abdulwahab et al. (2018)
liquid exfoliated graphene FET/Immunorecognition based on the glutaraldehyde modified liquid exfoliated graphene FET measured by current between the electrodes of drain and source Sensitivity <3 1–106 pM Zhang et al. (2019b)
3D Graphene FET/by introducing target miRNA affects the electrical potential of 3D-G and detection of miRNA 100 pM 100 pM–100 nM Song et al. (2020b)
Graphene on SiO2/Si Substrate FET/Trend of Dirac point shift by adsorption of single-stranded DNA studied Dirac Voltage Shift 10 V Yi et al. (2019)
Graphene on SiO2 Substrate FET/Back-gated G-FET-based on engineered hairpin probe DNA with improved sensitivity up to fM level <10 fM 1,000 nM–10 fM Gao et al. (2018)
Graphene/Magnetic bead G-FET/that uses clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats technology to enable the digital detection of a target sequence 1.7 fM Hajian et al. (2019)
Metal/SiO2/Ion-sensitive layer MOSFET/detected DNA by changing dielectric constant and then obtaining its threshold voltage 0.65 V Goel et al. (2018)
AlGaN/GaN on Si Substrate Transistor/proposed an electrical double layer gated high electron mobility transistor as DNA sensor 1 fM 1 pM–10 fM Chen et al. (2018)
Graphene/DNA tweezers probe FET/Single nucleotide polymorphism sensitivity achieved by observing changes in Dirac point shift and resistance change 100 pM 10 uM to 100 nM Hwang et al. (2018)
Single-walled carbon nanotubes (CNT) on SiO2 FET/Developed floating electrode-based DNA sensor with controllable responses based on Langmuir theory 100 fM 1 nM–10 uM Kim et al. (2012)
MoS2/Go/FET on Cu Substrate FET/DNA detection by charge transfer through MoS2 between graphene and DNA 10 aM 10 aM–100 p.m Chen et al. (2020)
AuNPs/single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) on SiO2 FET/DNA detection depend on the percolation paths of SWNTs in conduction channels 100 fM 0–1 nM Dong et al. (2008)
CNT and graphene/PCB/PAN Probe FET/reported array of Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors for detection of nucleic acid molecules 1 nM 1 Nm–1 μM Ganguli et al. (2018)
Graphene layer with Pyrenebutanoic acid succinimidyl ester FET/The negatively charged effect of DNA molecule used for FET/graphene-based DNA sensor. Non-covalent bonded DNA caused a “left” shift of the Dirac point 3 nM 1–32 nM Guo et al. (2011)
Polycrystalline Si Nanowire FET/enhanced FET sensitivity through using chimeric DNAs with methylated neutral nucleotides as probes 0.1 fM 0.1–10 fM Hu et al. (2018)
Crumpled/flat graphene FET Computational simulations reveal that deformed graphene could exhibit a change in band-gap, allowing an exponential change in the source-drain current from small numbers of charges (600 zM) [crumpled 2 pM(flat)] 10−3 M–10−20 M Hwang et al. (2020)
CNT devices embedded in polymer substrates substrate FET/CNT based flexible circuits for DNA sensors using Raman spectroscopy 160 nM Kang et al. (2008)
Liquid coplaner Graphene FET FET/Designed Liquid coplanar-gate graphene FET to detect and distinguish between single-stranded and double-stranded DNA molecules 1 nM 0–10 nM Kim et al. (2018)
Graphene, PS Brush, SiO2, Si FET/Used interfacial polymer brush layer, which is inserted between graphene and SiO2 to enhance the electrical properties of the sensor 12-mer ssDNA10 pM/μL Ku et al. (2018)
Au electrodes/polymer substrate/PDMS/PMMA MOSFET/developed a miRNA sensor using an electrical double layer gated FET biosensor with enhanced sensitivity and stability 100 fM 100–1,000 fM Kuo et al. (2019)
CNT/aryldiazonium salts/Si Substrate Designed single-point-functionalized CNTFETs have been used to sense conformational changes and binding events in nucleic acid structures from intrinsic molecular charge (Sp3 defects) 20-mer target DNA 100 nM Lee et al. (2018)
Graphene/Au Gate/Glass substrate/Electrolyte FET/The mechanism of this novel DNA sensor is that the gate potential drop is induced by DNA immobilization and hybridization on the Au gate electrode 1 fM 1 fM–5 μM Li et al. (2019b)
Graphene/MoS2 heterostructures/on a sapphire substrate/Laser Photoluminescence PL/characteristics of the grown graphene/MoS2 film are used for label-free and selective detection of DNA hybridization 1 aM 0.1∼1 fM Loan et al. (2014)
MoS2/Si/SiO2 substrate/Ti and Au Electrode FET/Developed label-free and direct hybridization assay using MoS2-FET biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of miRNA 0.03 fM 0.1 fM–10 nM Majd et al. (2018)
MoS2/Phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligos (PMO) FET/Developed PMO-modified MoS2 FET biosensor for detecting DNA based on PMO-DNA hybridization with high sensitivity and specificity 6 fM 10 fM–1 nM Mei et al. (2018)
Graphene embedded nanochannel device/Theoretical DFT-NEGFT Developed Graphene embedded nanochannel device that effectively controls the motion of nucleobases via p–p interaction and deciphers the ultrasensitivity of individual bases, one by one, in real time Fano resonance-driven conductance of individual bases Min et al. (2011)
Si3N4/Al on Si/SiO2Ag/AgCl References electrode CMOS FET/based on ion-sensitive field-effect transistor array using in-pixel quantization and compensation of sensor non-idealities 3.2 μs/pH 12.8 ns–33.1 ns Moser et al. (2018)
Al2O3 film/aluminum Floating Gate electrodes/polyethylene terephthalate substrates FET/presented electronic transduction of DNA hybridization by coupling OCMFETs and hairpin shaped probes 100pM 10 nM–10 pM Napoli et al. (2018)
Si3N4/doped Si substrate/Si nanonets (SiNN)/nanowires Si nanonet FET/reported field-effect silicon nanonet transistors for DNA sensing 30/30 tested devices Nguyen et al. (2019)
Graphene/SiO2/Si substrate/Au/Cr electrode FET/developed a COVID-19 FET sensor in which the SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody is conjugated to a graphene sheet, which is used as the sensing area 2.42 × 102 copies/mL 50–100 copies Seo et al. (2020)
Fluorescence FET/presented DNA sensor based on graphene and magnetic nanoparticles 1 pM 1 pM–10 nM Sun et al. (2019a)
Carbon nanotube/Pd electrodes/SiO2 substrate FET/a suspended CNT based FET was fabricated by utilizing the surface tension of liquid silver to suspend a CNT between two Pd electrodes for the detection of DNA hybridization 10 aM 1 pM–10 aM Sun et al. (2019c)
Monolayer graphene/Ag/AgCl electrode/ITO glass substrate G-FET/Using the graphene as the electric channel, fabricated G-FET sensor that can be used for detection of RNA 0.1 fM 0.1 fM to 1 pM Tian, (2018)
Liquid exfoliated graphene/solution-gated FET/silver paste FET/fabricated bioLEG-SgFETs and demonstrate their bio-application in single-strand DNA detection 10 fM 10-3-105 pM Wang and Jia (2018)
Silicon wafer FET FET/fabricated side-gated silicon nanowire FET was using complementary metal oxide semiconductor technology 0.83 fM 10 fM–10 nM Wu et al. (2018)

Preparation and synthesis of LD materials for optical and electrochemical applications (Bolotsky et al., 2019).

 3 Challenges and commercial applications

Sensors play an important role in our daily life specifically in the healthcare sector as DNA detection and its diagnostic involve curing diseases. The current trend and developing sensors are now hot topics. They have increasing demand after the nCov-19. A big challenge involving the development of DNA detection sensors requires components with on-site and rapid detection and detection limit. Before commercialization, it is very important to handle the stability and reproducibility of the samples. Another major challenge concerns the storage as handling the short lifetime of the samples and re-usage. The conventional detection methods are based on PCR techniques which are very expensive and time-consuming. It is one of the big challenges that involve the detection of ultra-low concentrations of any analyte. Another challenge involves the response time for detection. Developing accurate and economical DNA sensors is a present concern. Presently, DNA detection with nanopore technology has resolved this issue and these materials have already displayed unique characteristics. Compared to conventional methods 2D materials-based FET sensors involve the electric field to create a charge to interact with DNA and change in current results in the form of a signal to detect.

 4 Conclusion

Infectious diseases have posed a challenge in the past few years. Biosensing and biotechnology are emerging fields. In particular, DNA biosensors have potential research applications because of their chemical properties as well as reliable and fast detection.

We have reviewed different types of biosensors and listed the fabrication techniques and materials used to develop them. Conventional methods for developing in vitro diagnostics are time-consuming and require multiple trials and centralized technologies. There are diverse techniques and strategies for developing sensors, including, but not limited to, collecting samples, and implementing integrated diagnostics for biological applications. LD materials are considered as alternate to traditional materials due to their nanosized thickness and compatible nature. Currently, understanding nature of these materials in biological environment is major challenge. Critical challenges exist in transforming the optimal clinical treatment of infectious diseases from trial to translational research.

 Author contributions

MAz prepared the initial draft and collected the literature review, and MS collected most of the information. MZ, MAa, BS, and MWA reviewed and proofread the manuscript. All the authors have approved this manuscript.

 Funding

This work is supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, under the Reviewing Researcher Track (Grant No. 2389).

Authors would like to thank King Faisal University for supporting this research.

 Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

 References Abdulwahab M. H. M. Moser N. Rodriguez-Manzano J. Georgiou P. (2018). A CMOS bio-chip combining pH sensing, temperature regulation and electric field generation for DNA detection and manipulation. IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst., 1–5. Amini B. Kamali M. Salouti M. Yaghmaei P. (2018). Spectrophotometric, colorimetric and visually detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ETA gene based gold nanoparticles DNA probe and endonuclease enzyme. Spectrochim. Acta - Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 199, 421–429. 10.1016/j.saa.2018.03.056 Amini H. Ban Ž. Ferger M. Lorenzen S. Rauch F. Friedrich A. (2020). Tetracationic bis-triarylborane 1,3-butadiyne as a combined fluorimetric and Raman probe for simultaneous and selective sensing of various DNA, RNA, and proteins. Chemistry 26, 6017–6028. 10.1002/chem.201905328 Ayoib A. Hashim U. Gopinath S. C. B. Thivina V. Arshad M. K. M. (2020). Design and fabrication of PDMS microfluidics device for rapid and label-free DNA detection. Appl. Phys. A Mat. Sci. Process. 126, 193–198. 10.1007/s00339-020-3337-7 Azab M. Y. Hameed M. F. O. Nasr A. M. Obayya S. S. A. (2018). Label free detection for DNA hybridization using surface plasmon photonic crystal fiber biosensor. Opt. Quantum Electron. 50, 68–13. 10.1007/s11082-017-1302-2 Azeem M. M. Li Z. Wang Q. Amjad Q. M. N. Zubair M. Ahmed O. M. H. (2018a). “Classical molecular dynamics study for defect sink behavior in oxide dispersed strengthened alloys,” in Proceedings of 2018 15th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (Islamabad, Pakistan: IBCAST), 12–15. 10.1109/IBCAST.2018.8312177 Azeem M. M. Li Z. Wang Q. Hussian A. (2018b). Molecular dynamics simulation study on the possible factors affecting stability of ODS steel. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 389, 012003. 10.1088/1757-899X/389/1/012003 Azeem M. M. Wang Q. Li Z. Zhang Y. (2020). Dislocation-oxide interaction in Y2O3 embedded Fe: A molecular dynamics simulation study. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52, 337–343. 10.1016/j.net.2019.07.011 Azeem M. M. Wang Q. Zhang Y. Liu S. Zubair M. (2019a). Effect of grain boundary on diffusion of P in alpha-Fe: A molecular dynamics study. Front. Phys. 7, 1–7. 10.3389/fphy.2019.00097 Azeem M. M. Wang Q. Zubair M. (2019b). Atomistic simulations of nanoindentation response of irradiation defects in iron. Sains Malays. 48, 2029–2039. 10.17576/jsm-2019-4809-24 Azeem M. M. Yun D. Zubair M. (2021). Atomic insights on interaction mechanism of dislocation with void/impurity/precipitates in bcc iron. Int. Conf. Nucl. Eng. Proc. ICONE 2, 1–7. 10.1115/ICONE28-65197 Babar Z. U. D. Della Ventura B. Velotta R. Iannotti V. (2022). Advances and emerging challenges in MXenes and their nanocomposites for biosensing applications. RSC Adv. 12, 19590–19610. 10.1039/d2ra02985e Bakshi S. F. Guz N. Zakharchenko A. Deng H. Tumanov A. V. Woodworth C. D. (2017). Magnetic field-activated sensing of mRNA in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 12117–12120. 10.1021/jacs.7b06022 Bakshi S. Zakharchenko A. Minko S. Kolpashchikov D. M. Katz E. (2019). Towards nanomaterials for cancer theranostics: A system of dna-modified magnetic nanoparticles for detection and suppression of rna marker in cancer cells. Magnetochemistry 5, 24. 10.3390/magnetochemistry5020024 Balaji A. Yang S. Wang J. Zhang J. (2019). Graphene oxide-based nanostructured DNA sensor. Biosensors 9, 74. 10.3390/bios9020074 Banerjee I. Aralaguppe S. G. Lapins N. Zhang W. Kazemzadeh A. Sönnerborg A. (2019). Microfluidic centrifugation assisted precipitation based DNA quantification. Lab. Chip 19, 1657–1664. 10.1039/c9lc00196d Bechnak L. El Kurdi R. Patra D. (2020). Fluorescence sensing of nucleic acid by curcumin encapsulated poly(ethylene oxide)-block-poly(propylene oxide)-block-poly(ethylene oxide) based nanocapsules. J. Fluoresc. 30, 547–556. 10.1007/s10895-020-02528-9 Benelmekki M. Kim J.-H. (2023). Stimulus-responsive ultrathin films for bioapplications: A concise review. Molecules 28, 1020. 10.3390/molecules28031020 Bi Q. Gan X. Yuan R. Xiang Y. (2020). Copper-free click chemistry-mediated cyclic ligation amplification for highly sensitive and non-label electrochemical detection of gene mutation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 027535. 10.1149/1945-7111/ab6a81 Bolotsky A. Butler D. Dong C. Gerace K. Glavin N. R. Muratore C. (2019). Two-dimensional materials in biosensing and healthcare: From in vitro diagnostics to optogenetics and beyond. ACS Nano 13, 9781–9810. 10.1021/acsnano.9b03632 Bruijns B. van Asten A. Tiggelaar R. Gardeniers H. (2016). Microfluidic devices for forensic DNA analysis: A review. Biosensors 6, 41–35. 10.3390/bios6030041 Campos R. Borme J. Guerreiro J. R. Machado G. J. Cerqueira M. F. Petrovykh D. Y. (2019). Attomolar label-free detection of DNA hybridization with electrolyte-gated graphene field-effect transistors. ACS Sensors 4, 286–293. 10.1021/acssensors.8b00344 Cantor D. (1998). Crafting science: A sociohistory of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Bull. Hist. Med. 72, 590–592. 10.1353/bhm.1998.0127 Cao H. Zhou X. Zeng Y. (2019). Microfluidic exponential rolling circle amplification for sensitive microRNA detection directly from biological samples. Sens. Actuators. B. Chem. 279, 447–457. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.09.121 Cao X. Zhang K. Yan W. Xia Z. He S. Xu X. (2020). Calcium ion assisted fluorescence determination of microRNA-167 using carbon dots-labeled probe DNA and polydopamine-coated Fe(3)O(4) nanoparticles. Mikrochim. Acta 187, 212. 10.1007/s00604-020-4209-8 Chen S. Sun Y. Xia Y. Lv K. Man B. Yang C. (2020). Donor effect dominated molybdenum disulfide/graphene nanostructure-based field-effect transistor for ultrasensitive DNA detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 156, 1–7. 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112128 Chen Y. Tai T. Hsu C. Sarangadharan I. Kumar A. Wang H. (2018). Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical Direct detection of DNA using electrical double layer gated high electron mobility transistor in high ionic strength solution with high sensitivity and speci fi city. Sensors Actuators B. Chem. 271, 110–117. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.05.119 Chen Z. Peng Y. Xie X. Feng Y. Li T. Li S. (2019). Dendrimer-functionalized superparamagnetic nanobeacons for real-time detection and depletion of HSP90α mRNA and MR imaging. Theranostics 9, 5784–5796. 10.7150/thno.36545 Cheung L. S. Wei X. Martins D. Song Y.-A. (2018). Rapid detection of exosomal microRNA biomarkers by electrokinetic concentration for liquid biopsy on chip. Biomicrofluidics 12, 014104. 10.1063/1.5009719 Chiticaru E. A. Pilan L. Damian C. M. Vasile E. Burns J. S. Ionita M. (2019). Influence of graphene oxide concentration when fabricating an electrochemical biosensor for DNA detection. Biosensors 9, 113–118. 10.3390/bios9040113 Das C. M. Guo Y. Kang L. Poenar D. P. Xiong J. Ramaswamy Y. (2021). Improving the sensitivity of SPR sensors with Au–Ag alloys and 2D materials — A simulation-based approach. Adv. Theory Simulations 4, 1–10. 10.1002/adts.202100292 Deng H. Chai Y. Yuan R. Yuan Y. (2020). In situ formation of multifunctional DNA nanospheres for a sensitive and accurate dual-mode biosensor for photoelectrochemical and electrochemical assay. Anal. Chem. 92, 8364–8370. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00918 Deng S. Wang P. Yu X. (2017). Phase-sensitive surface plasmon resonance sensors: Recent progress and future prospects. Sensors Switz. 17, 2819. 10.3390/s17122819 Dinter F. Burdukiewicz M. Schierack P. Lehmann W. Nestler J. Dame G. (2019). Simultaneous detection and quantification of DNA and protein biomarkers in spectrum of cardiovascular diseases in a microfluidic microbead chip. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 411, 7725–7735. 10.1007/s00216-019-02199-x Dong X. Lau C. M. Lohani A. Mhaisalkar S. G. Kasim J. Shen Z. (2008). Electrical detection of femtomolar DNA via gold-nanoparticle enhancement in carbon-nanotube-network field-effect transistors. Adv. Mat. 20, 2389–2393. 10.1002/adma.200702798 Feng E. Zheng T. Tian Y. (2019). Dual-mode Au nanoprobe based on surface enhancement Raman scattering and colorimetry for sensitive determination of telomerase activity both in cell extracts and in the urine of patients. ACS Sensors 4, 211–217. 10.1021/acssensors.8b01244 Fuku X. Baker P. Iwuoha E. (2020). Influence of quantum dot surface on electrochemical DNA sensing mechanism. ChemElectroChem 7, 770–781. 10.1002/celc.201902079 Ganguli A. Watanabe Y. Hwang M. T. Huang J. C. Bashir R. (2018). Robust label-free microRNA detection using one million ISFET array. Biomed. Microdevices 20, 45. 10.1007/s10544-018-0290-8 Gao J. Zhang H. Wang Z. (2020a). A DNA tetrahedron nanoprobe-based fluorescence resonance energy transfer sensing platform for intracellular tumor-related miRNA detection. Analyst 145, 3535–3542. 10.1039/C9AN02610J Gao Y. Qiang L. Chu Y. Han Y. Zhang Y. Han L. (2020b). Microfluidic chip for multiple detection of miRNA biomarkers in breast cancer based on three-segment hybridization. AIP Adv. 10, 045022. 10.1063/1.5137784 Gao Z. Xia H. Zauberman J. Tomaiuolo M. Ping J. Zhang Q. (2018). Detection of sub-fM DNA with target recycling and self-assembly ampli fi cation on graphene field-E ff ect biosensors, Nano Lett 18. 3509-3515. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00572 García-Mendiola T. Gutiérrez-Sánchez C. Gibaja C. Torres I. Busó-Rogero C. Pariente F. (2020). Functionalization of a few-layer antimonene with oligonucleotides for DNA sensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mat. 3, 3625–3633. 10.1021/acsanm.0c00335 Goel A. Rewari S. Verma S. Gupta R. S. (2018). Dielectric modulated triple metal gate all around MOSFET (TMGAA) for DNA bio- molecule detection. 1, 24–25. Guerrini L. Morla-Folch J. Gisbert-Quilis P. Xie H. Alvarez-Puebla R. A. (2016). Label-free direct surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) of nucleic acids (Conference Presentation). SPIE Proceeding 9722, 23. 10.1117/12.2217653 Guo J. Chen Y. Jiang Y. Ju H. (2017). Polyadenine-modulated DNA conformation monitored by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) on multibranched gold nanoparticles and its sensing application. Chemistry 23, 9332–9337. 10.1002/chem.201700883 Guo Q. Yu Y. Zhang H. Cai C. Shen Q. (2020). Electrochemical sensing of exosomal MicroRNA based on hybridization chain reaction signal amplification with reduced false-positive signals. Anal. Chem. 92, 5302–5310. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05849 Guo S. R. Lin J. Penchev M. Yengel E. Ghazinejad M. Ozkan C. S. (2011). Label free DNA detection using large area graphene based field effect transistor biosensors. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11, 5258–5263. 10.1166/jnn.2011.3885 Hajian R. Balderston S. Tran T. deBoer T. Etienne J. Sandhu M. (2019). Detection of unamplified target genes via CRISPR-Cas9 immobilized on a graphene field-effect transistor. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 3, 427–437. 10.1038/s41551-019-0371-x Hameed M. F. O. Saadeldin A. S. Elkaramany E. M. A. Obayya S. S. A. (2017). Label-free highly sensitive hybrid plasmonic biosensor for the detection of DNA hybridization. J. Light. Technol. 35, 4851–4858. 10.1109/jlt.2017.2733720 Han B. Zhang Y. Zhu L. Chen X.-H. Ma Z. Zhang X.-L. (2018a). Direct laser scribing of AgNPs@RGO biochip as a reusable SERS sensor for DNA detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 10.1063/1.5137784 Han S. Liu W. Zheng M. Wang R. (2020). Label-free and ultrasensitive electrochemical DNA biosensor based on urchinlike carbon nanotube-gold nanoparticle nanoclusters. Anal. Chem. 92, 4780–4787. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03520 Han S. Locke A. K. Oaks L. A. Cheng Y.-S. L. Coté G. L. (2018b). Development of a free-solution SERS-based assay for point-of-care oral cancer biomarker detection using DNA-conjugated gold nanoparticles. Proc. SPIE, 1050104. 10.1117/12.2290516 Han S. Locke A. K. Oaks L. A. Cheng Y. L. Coté G. L. Han S. (2019). Nanoparticle-based assay for detection of S100P mRNA using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 24, 1–9. 10.1117/1.jbo.24.5.055001 Hao K. He Y. Lu H. Pu S. Zhang Y. Dong H. (2017). High-sensitive surface plasmon resonance microRNA biosensor based on streptavidin functionalized gold nanorods-assisted signal amplification. Anal. Chim. Acta 954, 114–120. 10.1016/j.aca.2016.12.006 He Y. Yang X. Yuan R. Chai Y. (2019). A novel ratiometric SERS biosensor with one Raman probe for ultrasensitive microRNA detection based on DNA hydrogel amplification. J. Mat. Chem. B 7, 2643–2647. 10.1039/c8tb02894j Hlongwane G. N. Dodoo-Arhin D. Wamwangi D. Daramola M. O. Moothi K. Iyuke S. E. (2019). DNA hybridisation sensors for product authentication and tracing: State of the art and challenges. South Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 27, 16–34. 10.1016/j.sajce.2018.11.002 Hu W. P. Tsai C. C. Yang Y. S. Chan H. W. H. Chen W. Y. (2018). Synergetic improvements of sensitivity and specificity of nanowire field effect transistor gene chip by designing neutralized DNA as probe. Sci. Rep. 8, 12598–8. 10.1038/s41598-018-30996-4 Huang Y. Tao M. Luo S. Zhang Y. Situ B. Ye X. (2020). A novel nest hybridization chain reaction based electrochemical assay for sensitive detection of circulating tumor DNA. Anal. Chim. Acta 1107, 40–47. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.02.006 Hügle M. Behrmann O. Raum M. Hufert F. T. Urban G. A. Dame G. (2020). A lab-on-a-chip for free-flow electrophoretic preconcentration of viruses and gel electrophoretic DNA extraction. Analyst 145, 2554–2561. 10.1039/C9AN02333J Hwang M. T. Heiranian M. Kim Y. You S. Leem J. Taqieddin A. (2020). Ultrasensitive detection of nucleic acids using deformed graphene channel field effect biosensors. Nat. Commun. 11, 1543. 10.1038/s41467-020-15330-9 Hwang M. T. Wang Z. Ping J. Ban D. K. Shiah Z. C. Antonschmidt L. (2018). DNA nanotweezers and graphene transistor enable label-free genotyping. Adv. Mat. 30, e1802440. 10.1002/adma.201802440 Jayadevimanoranjitham J. Narayanan S. S. (2020). Fabrication of poly o-cresophthalein complexone film modified electrode and its application to simultaneous determination of purine bases in denatured DNA. Mat. Sci. Eng. C. Mat. Biol. Appl. 108, 110353. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110353 Jia L.-P. Feng Z. Zhao R.-N. Ma R.-N. Zhang W. Shang L. (2020). Enzyme-free and triple-amplified electrochemical sensing of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine by three kinds of short pDNA-driven catalyzed hairpin assemblies followed by a hybridization chain reaction. Analyst 145, 3605–3611. 10.1039/D0AN00233J Jiang J. Wu H. Su Y. Liang Y. Shu B. Zhang C. (2020a). Electrochemical cloth-based DNA sensors (ECDSs): A new class of electrochemical gene sensors. Anal. Chem. 92, 7708–7716. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00669 Jiang P. Tan M. Zhao L. Wang Y. Pan T. Chomba H. (2020b). A novel electrochemical DNA detection method based on bio-barcode/gold label silver stain dual amplification. Mat. Express 10, 206–213. 10.1166/mex.2020.1633 Jiang W. Yin H. Zhou Y. Duan J. Li H. Wang M. (2018). A novel electrochemiluminescence biosensor for the detection of 5-methylcytosine, TET 1 protein and β-glucosyltransferase activities based on gold nanoclusters-H2O2 system. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 274, 144–151. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.07.149 Jiang Z. Y. Jiang X. X. Su S. Wei X. P. Lee S. T. He Y. (2012). Silicon-based reproducible and active surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates for sensitive, specific, and multiplex DNA detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 203104. 10.1063/1.3701731 Jiao Z. Zhao L. Tang C. Shi H. Wang F. Hu B. (2019). Droplet-based PCR in a 3D-printed microfluidic chip for miRNA-21 detection. Anal. Methods 11, 3286–3293. 10.1039/c9ay01108k Kang J. Lee J. Kim T. H. Park J. Seong M. J. Hong S. (2008). Large-scale assembly of carbon nanotube-based flexible circuits for DNA sensors. Nanotechnology 19, 135305. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/13/135305 Kannegulla A. Liu Y. Wu B. Cheng L.-J. (2018a10728). Enhanced molecular beacon based DNA detection using plasmonic open-ring nanoarrays. Proc. SPIE. 10.1117/12.2321234 Kannegulla A. Liu Y. Wu B. Cheng L. J. (2018b). Plasmonic open-ring nanoarrays for broadband fluorescence enhancement and ultrasensitive DNA detection. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 770–776. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09769 Khalil I. Yehye W. A. Julkapli N. M. Rahmati S. Sina A. A. I. Basirun W. J. (2019). Graphene oxide and gold nanoparticle based dual platform with short DNA probe for the PCR free DNA biosensing using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Biosens. Bioelectron. 131, 214–223. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.02.028 Khoder R. Korri-Youssoufi H. (2020). E-DNA biosensors of M. tuberculosis based on nanostructured polypyrrole. Mat. Sci. Eng. C. Mat. Biol. Appl. 108, 110371. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110371 Kim B. Lee J. Namgung S. Kim J. Park J. Y. Lee M. S. (2012). DNA sensors based on CNT-FET with floating electrodes. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 169, 182–187. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.04.063 Kim H. Hyejeong J. Moon J. Byun J. Jeong J. Juyeon J. (2019). Metal–organic framework coating for the preservation of silver nanowire surface‐enhanced Raman scattering platform. Adv. Mat. Interfaces 6, 1900427. 10.1002/admi.201900427 Kim J.-H. Benelmekki M. (2018). “Bottom-up synthesis of hybrid carbon nanoscrolls,” in Emerging applications of nanoparticles and architecture nanostructures. Editors Barhoum, A. Makhlouf A. N. (Elsevier). 10.1016/B978-0-323-51254-1.00018-X Kim J.-H. Benelmekki M. (2019). “Two-dimensional nanostructures for biomedical applications,” in Nanostructured thin film: Fundamentals and applications. Editors Benelmekki, M. Erbe A. B. T.-F. of N. (Elsevier). 10.1016/B978-0-08-102572-7.00004-0 Kim J. H. Bohra M. Singh V. Cassidy C. Sowwan M. (2014). Smart composite nanosheets with adaptive optical properties. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 6, 13339–13343. 10.1021/am5041708 Kim J. Sahloul S. Orozaliev A. Do V. Q. Pham V. S. Martins D. (2020). Microfluidic electrokinetic preconcentration chips: Enhancing the detection of nucleic acids and exosomes. IEEE Nanotechnol. Mag. 14, 18–34. 10.1109/MNANO.2020.2966064 Kim J. W. JanghaKu Y. G. M. Kim S. Lee E. Cho K. (2018). Liquid coplanar-gate organic/graphene hybrid electronics for label-free detection of single and double-stranded DNA molecules. Org. Electron. 62, 163–167. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.07.032 Kim Y.-J. Hosokawa K. Maeda M. (2019). Sensitivity enhancement of MicroRNA detection using a power-free microfluidic chip. Anal. Sci. Int. J. Jpn. Soc. Anal. Chem. 35, 1227–1236. 10.2116/analsci.19P211 Kong M. Li Z. Wu J. Hu J. Sheng Y. Wu D. (2019). Talanta A wearable microfluidic device for rapid detection of HIV-1 DNA using recombinase polymerase amplification. Talanta 205, 1–8. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120155 Kowalczyk A. Krajczewski J. Kowalik A. Weyher J. L. Dzięcielewski I. Chłopek M. (2019). New strategy for the gene mutation identification using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Biosens. Bioelectron. 132, 326–332. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.03.019 Krishnan S. Syed Z. Q. (2022). Colorimetric visual sensors for point-of-needs testing. Sensors Actuators Rep. 4, 100078. 10.1016/j.snr.2022.100078 Ku G. M. Kim J. W. Jang Y. h. Kim S. Lim K. Lee W. H. (2018). Interfacial polymer brush layer for DNA sensors based on graphene transistors. Fibers Polym. 19, 2483–2488. 10.1007/s12221-018-8608-y Kuo W. C. Sarangadharan I. Pulikkathodi A. K. Chen P. H. Wang S. L. Wu C. R. (2019). Investigation of electrical stability and sensitivity of electric double layer gated field-effect transistors (FETs) for miRNA detection. Sensors Switz. 19, 1484. 10.3390/s19071484 Lapitan L. D. S. Xu Y. Guo Y. Zhou D. (2019). Combining magnetic nanoparticle capture and poly-enzyme nanobead amplification for ultrasensitive detection and discrimination of DNA single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nanoscale 11, 1195–1204. 10.1039/c8nr07641c Lednický T. Bonyár A. (2020). Large scale fabrication of ordered gold nanoparticle-epoxy surface nanocomposites and their application as label-free plasmonic DNA biosensors. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 12, 4804–4814. 10.1021/acsami.9b20907 Lee S. H. Song J. Cho B. Hong S. G. Hoxha O. Kang T. (2019). Bubble-free rapid microfluidic PCR. Biosens. Bioelectron. 126, 725–733. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.10.005 Lee Y. Trocchia S. M. Warren S. B. Young E. F. Vernick S. Shepard K. L. (2018). Electrically controllable single-point covalent functionalization of spin-cast carbon- nanotube field-effect transistor arrays. ACS Nano 12, 9922–9930. 10.1021/acsnano.8b03073 Lei P. Zhou Y. Zhu R. Liu Y. Dong C. Shuang S. (2020). Novel strategy of electrochemical analysis of DNA bases with enhanced performance based on copper-nickel nanosphere decorated N,B-doped reduced graphene oxide. Biosens. Bioelectron. 147, 111735. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111735 Li C. Li G. Liu H. Xiao Z. Jin M. Yuan C. (2020a). A novel gold nanoparticles decorated magnetic microbead-based molecular beacon for DNA multiplexing detection by flow cytometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1110, 19–25. 10.1016/j.aca.2020.02.063 Li F. Li F. Mao X. Li F. Li M. Shen J. (2020b). Ultrafast DNA sensors with DNA framework-bridged hybridization reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 9975–9981. 10.1021/jacs.9b13737 Li H. Rothberg L. (2004). Colorimetric detection of DNA sequences based on electrostatic interactions with unmodified gold nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 14036–14039. 10.1073/pnas.0406115101 Li J. Zhao L. Wen D. Li X. Yang H. Wang D. (2020c). Electrochemical CYFRA21-1 DNA sensor with PCR-like sensitivity based on AgNPs and cascade polymerization. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 412, 4155–4163. 10.1007/s00216-020-02652-2 Li L. Miao B. Li Z. Sun Z. Peng N. (2019a). Sample-to-Answer hepatitis B virus DNA detection from whole blood on a centrifugal microfluidic platform with double rotation axes. ACS Sensors 4, 2738–2745. 10.1021/acssensors.9b01270 Li M. Lin H. Paidi S. K. Mesyngier N. Preheim S. Barman I. (2020d). A fluorescence and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic dual-modal aptasensor for sensitive detection of cyanotoxins. ACS Sensors 5, 1419–1426. 10.1021/acssensors.0c00307 Li S. Huang K. Fan Q. Yang S. Shen T. Mei T. (2019b). Highly sensitive solution-gated graphene transistors for label-free DNA detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 136, 91–96. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.04.034 Li X.-Y. Cui Y.-X. Du Y.-C. Tang A.-N. Kong D.-M. (2020e). Isothermal cross-boosting extension-nicking reaction mediated exponential signal amplification for ultrasensitive detection of polynucleotide kinase. Analyst 145, 3742–3748. 10.1039/c9an02569c Li Y. Holl N. J. Li Y. Peng Z. Holl N. J. Hassan R. (2021). MXene–graphene field-effect transistor sensing of influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2. ACS Omega 6, 6643–6653. 10.1021/acsomega.0c05421 Liao H. Zhou Y. Chai Y. Yuan R. (2018). An ultrasensitive electrochemiluminescence biosensor for detection of MicroRNA by in-situ electrochemically generated copper nanoclusters as luminophore and TiO(2) as coreaction accelerator. Biosens. Bioelectron. 114, 10–14. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.05.011 Liu D. Zhang X. Zhao J. Chen S. Yuan R. (2020a). An ultrasensitive sensing platform for microRNA-155 based on H(2)O(2) quenched hydroxide-dependent ECL emission of PFO Pdots. Biosens. Bioelectron. 150, 111872. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111872 Liu G. Ma X. Tang Y. Miao P. (2020b). Ratiometric fluorescence method for ctDNA analysis based on the construction of a DNA four-way junction. Analyst 145, 1174–1178. 10.1039/d0an00044b Liu P. Yang X. Sun S. Wang Q. Wang K. Huang J. (2013). Enzyme-free colorimetric detection of DNA by using gold nanoparticles and hybridization chain reaction amplification. Anal. Chem. 85, 7689–7695. 10.1021/ac4001157 Liu Q. Sun X. Liu M. Jin Y. Li B. (2020c). G-triplex molecular beacon‒based fluorescence biosensor for sensitive detection of small molecule-protein interaction via exonuclease III‒assisted recycling amplification. Sensors Actuators B-chemical 310, 127804. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127804 Liu S. Wei M. Wang X. Shi C. Kuang S. Ma C. (2020d). An ultrasensitive electrochemical DNA sensing strategy free from pre-immobilization via G-quadruplex based homogenous proximity hybridization. Talanta 210, 120628. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120628 Liu Y. Chen X. Ma Q. (2018). A novel amplified electrochemiluminescence biosensor based on Au NPs@PDA@CuInZnS QDs nanocomposites for ultrasensitive detection of p53 gene. Biosens. Bioelectron. 117, 240–245. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.06.023 Liu Y. Hu N. (2007). Loading/release behavior of (chitosan/DNA)n layer-by-layer films toward negatively charged anthraquinone and its application in electrochemical detection of natural DNA damage. Biosens. Bioelectron. 23, 661–667. 10.1016/j.bios.2007.07.009 Liu Y. Nie Y. Wang M. Zhang Q. Ma Q. (2020e). Distance-dependent plasmon-enhanced electrochemiluminescence biosensor based on MoS(2) nanosheets. Biosens. Bioelectron. 148, 111823. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111823 Liu Y. Tu Y. Wu H. Zhang H. Chen H. Zhou G. (2020f). A renewable DNA biosensor for sensitive detection of DNA methyltransferase activity based on cascade signal amplification. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 313, 128029. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128029 Liu Z. Lei S. Zou L. Li G. Xu L. Ye B. (2020). Highly ordered 3D electrochemical DNA biosensor based on dual orientation controlled rolling motor and graftable tetrahedron DNA. Biosens. Bioelectron. 147, 111759. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111759 Loan P. T. K. Zhang W. Lin C. T. Wei K. H. Li L. J. Chen C. H. (2014). Graphene/MoS2 heterostructures for ultrasensitive detection of DNA hybridisation. Adv. Mat. 26, 4838–4844. 10.1002/adma.201401084 Lu C. Liu Y. Ying Y. Liu J. (2017). Comparison of MoS2, WS2, and graphene oxide for DNA adsorption and sensing. Langmuir 33, 630–637. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04502 Ma D. Huang C. Zheng J. Tang J. Li J. Yang J. (2018). Quantitative detection of exosomal microRNA extracted from human blood based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Biosens. Bioelectron. 101, 167–173. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.08.062 Majd S. M. Salimi A. Ghasemi F. (2018). An ultrasensitive detection of miRNA-155 in breast cancer via direct hybridization assay using two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide field-effect transistor biosensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 105, 6–13. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.01.009 Mariani S. Scarano S. Spadavecchia J. Minunni M. (2015). A reusable optical biosensor for the ultrasensitive and selective detection of unamplified human genomic DNA with gold nanostars. Biosens. Bioelectron. 74, 981–988. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.071 Mei J. Li Y. T. Zhang H. Xiao M. M. Ning Y. Zhang Z. Y. (2018). Molybdenum disulfide field-effect transistor biosensor for ultrasensitive detection of DNA by employing morpholino as probe. Biosens. Bioelectron. 110, 71–77. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.03.043 Min S. K. Kim W. Y. Cho Y. Kim K. S. (2011). Fast DNA sequencing with a graphene-based nanochannel device. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 162–165. 10.1038/nnano.2010.283 Minero G. A. S. Cangiano V. Garbarino F. Fock J. Hansen M. F. (2019). Integration of microbead DNA handling with optomagnetic detection in rolling circle amplification assays. Mikrochim. Acta 186, 528. 10.1007/s00604-019-3636-x Minero G. A. S. Tefiku E. Garbarino F. Fock J. Hansen M. F. (2020). On-chip DNA analysis of tuberculosis based on magnetic nanoparticle clustering induced by rolling circle amplification products. IEEE Magn. Lett. 11, 1–5. 10.1109/LMAG.2019.2959545 Miscourides N. Yu L.-S. Rodriguez-Manzano J. Georgiou P. (2018). A 12.8 k current-mode velocity-saturation ISFET array for on-chip real-time DNA detection. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 12, 1202–1214. 10.1109/TBCAS.2018.2851448 Mohammadi A. V. Rosen J. Gogotsi Y. (2021). The world of two-dimensional carbides and nitrides (MXenes). Science 80-, eabf1581. 10.1126/science.abf1581 Moser N. Rodriguez-Manzano J. Lande T. S. Georgiou P. (2018). A scalable ISFET sensing and memory array with sensor auto-calibration for on-chip real-time DNA detection. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 12, 390–401. 10.1109/TBCAS.2017.2789161 Movilli J. Kolkman R. W. Rozzi A. Corradini R. Segerink L. I. Huskens J. (2020). Increasing the sensitivity of electrochemical DNA detection by a micropillar-structured biosensing surface. Langmuir 36, 4272–4279. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00144 Mujawar M. A. Gohel H. Bhardwaj S. K. Srinivasan S. Hickman N. Kaushik A. (2020). Nano-enabled biosensing systems for intelligent healthcare: Towards COVID-19 management. Mat. Today Chem. 17, 100306. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100306 Mustafa A. M. Li Z. Shao L. (2017). “Molecular dynamics simulations of damage cascades creation in oxide-particle-embedded Fe,” in 25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering,ASME, 1–5. 10.1115/ICONE25-67356 Mustafa Azeem M. Abd El Gawad K. Zubair M. Ibrahim S. A. Ado M. Mehdi G. (2019). “Radiation damage effects in oxide dispersion strengthened steel alloys,” in Proceedings, ICONE International Conference on Nuclear Engineering. 10.1299/jsmeicone.2019.27.2086 Mustafa Azeem M. Li Z. Wang Q. Zubair M. (2018). Molecular dynamics studies and irradiation effects in ODSS alloys. Int. J. Nucl. Energy Sci. Technol. 12, 381–399. 10.1504/IJNEST.2018.097200 Na H.-K. Wi J.-S. Son H. Y. Ok J. G. Huh Y.-M. Lee T. G. (2018). Discrimination of single nucleotide mismatches using a scalable, flexible, and transparent three-dimensional nanostructure-based plasmonic miRNA sensor with high sensitivity. Biosens. Bioelectron. 113, 39–45. 10.1016/j.bios.2018.04.033 Napoli C. Lai S. Giannetti A. Tombelli S. Baldini F. Barbaro M. (2018). Electronic detection of DNA hybridization by coupling organic field-effect transistor-based sensors and hairpin-shaped probes. Sensors Switz. 18, 990. 10.3390/s18040990 Naresh V. Lee N. (2021). A review on biosensors and recent development of nanostructured materials-enabled biosensors. Sensors Switz. 21, 1109–1135. 10.3390/s21041109 Ng E. Yao C. Shultz T. O. Ross-Howe S. Wang S. X. (2019). Magneto-nanosensor smartphone platform for the detection of HIV and leukocytosis at point-of-care. Nanomedicine 16, 10–19. 10.1016/j.nano.2018.11.007 Nguyen T. T. T. Legallais M. Morisot F. Cazimajou T. Stambouli V. Mouis M. (2019). First evidence of superiority of Si nanonet field effect transistors over multi-parallel Si nanowire ones in view of electrical DNA hybridization detection. Mat. Res. Express 6, 016301. 10.1088/2053-1591/aae0d5 Novara C. Chiadò A. Paccotti N. Catuogno S. Esposito C. L. Condorelli G. (2017). SERS-active metal-dielectric nanostructures integrated in microfluidic devices for label-free quantitative detection of miRNA. Faraday Discuss. 205, 271–289. 10.1039/C7FD00140A Ouyang L. Hu Y. Zhu L. Cheng G. J. Irudayaraj J. (2017). A reusable laser wrapped graphene-Ag array based SERS sensor for trace detection of genomic DNA methylation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 92, 755–762. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.072 Pal S. Chakraborty M. Sarkar N. (2020). Graphene oxide functionalized with 5-aminophenanthroline for selective detection of adenine through fluorescence “turn-off–on” response. ACS Appl. Nano Mat. 3, 3532–3539. 10.1021/acsanm.0c00212 Patching S. G. (2014). Surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy for characterisation of membrane protein-ligand interactions and its potential for drug discovery. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1838, 43–55. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.04.028 Perez-Toralla K. Pereiro I. Garrigou S. Di Federico F. Proudhon C. Bidard F. C. (2019). Microfluidic extraction and digital quantification of circulating cell-free DNA from serum. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 286, 533–539. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.159 Ploetz E. Lerner E. Husada F. Roelfs M. Chung S. Hohlbein J. (2016). Förster resonance energy transfer and protein-induced fluorescence enhancement as synergetic multi-scale molecular rulers. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–18. 10.1038/srep33257 Prada J. Cordes C. Harms C. Lang W. (2019). Design and manufacturing of a disposable, cyclo-olefin copolymer, microfluidic device for a biosensor. Sensors Switz. 19, 1178. 10.3390/s19051178 Pramanik S. Nandy A. Chakraborty S. Pramanik U. Nandi S. Mukherjee S. (2020). Preferential binding of thioflavin T to AT-rich DNA: White light emission through intramolecular förster resonance energy transfer. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 2436–2442. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00237 Qi X. Bi J. (2019). Plasmonic sensors relying on nanoparticle arrays created by a template-directed dewetting process. Opt. Commun. 453, 124328. 10.1016/j.optcom.2019.124328 Qian Z. S. Shan X. Y. Chai L. J. Ma J. J. Chen J. R. Feng H. (2014). A universal fluorescence sensing strategy based on biocompatible graphene quantum dots and graphene oxide for the detection of DNA. Nanoscale 6, 5671–5674. 10.1039/c3nr06583a Quan P. L. Sauzade M. Brouzes E. (2018). Dpcr: A technology review. Sensors Switz. 18, 1271. 10.3390/s18041271 Rahman M. Cui D. Zhou S. Zhang A. Chen D. (2020). A graphene oxide coated gold nanostar based sensing platform for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of circulating tumor DNA. Anal. Methods 12, 440–447. 10.1039/C9AY01620A Ramshani Z. Zhang C. Richards K. Chen L. Xu G. Stiles B. L. (2019). Extracellular vesicle microRNA quantification from plasma using an integrated microfluidic device. Commun. Biol. 2, 189–9. 10.1038/s42003-019-0435-1 Ren R. Bi Q. Yuan R. Xiang Y. (2020). An efficient, label-free and sensitive electrochemical microRNA sensor based on target-initiated catalytic hairpin assembly of trivalent DNAzyme junctions. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 304, 127068. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127068 Roether J. Chu K.-Y. Willenbacher N. Shen A. Q. Bhalla N. (2019). Real-time monitoring of DNA immobilization and detection of DNA polymerase activity by a microfluidic nanoplasmonic platform. Biosens. Bioelectron. 142, 111528. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111528 Saad S. M. Abdullah J. Abd Rashid S. Fen Y. W. Salam F. Yih L. H. (2020). A carbon dots based fluorescence sensing for the determination of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Measurement 160, 107845. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107845 Sánchez-Paniagua M. Palenzuela-Batista S. Manzanares-Palenzuela C. L. López-Ruiz B. (2020). Electrochemical genosensor for Klotho detection based on aliphatic and aromatic thiols self-assembled monolayers. Talanta 212, 120735. 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120735 Santhanam M. Algov I. Alfonta L. (2020). DNA/RNA electrochemical biosensing devices a future replacement of PCR methods for a fast epidemic containment. Sensors Switz. 20, 1–15. 10.3390/s20164648 Seo G. Lee G. Kim M. J. Baek S. H. Choi M. Ku K. B. (2020). Rapid detection of COVID-19 causative virus (SARS-CoV-2) in human nasopharyngeal swab specimens using field-effect transistor-based biosensor. ACS Nano 14, 5135–5142. 10.1021/acsnano.0c02823 Sforzi J. Ferrauto G. Aime S. Geninatti Crich S. (2020). A simple and fast assay based on carboxyfluorescein-loaded liposome for quantitative DNA detection. ACS Omega 5, 1764–1772. 10.1021/acsomega.9b01457 Shen C.-H. (2019). “Detection and analysis of nucleic acids,” in Diagnostic molecular biology. Editor Shen C.-H. B. T.-D. M. B. (Academic Press), 167–185. 10.1016/B978-0-12-802823-0.00007-9 Shen X. Liu D. Zhu C. Li Y. Liu Y. You T. (2020). Photoelectrochemical and electrochemical ratiometric aptasensing: A case study of streptomycin. Electrochem. Commun. 110, 106637. 10.1016/j.elecom.2019.106637 Shen Z. He L. Wang W. Tan L. Gan N. (2020). Highly sensitive and simultaneous detection of microRNAs in serum using stir-bar assisted magnetic DNA nanospheres-encoded probes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 148, 111831. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111831 Shlyapnikov Y. M. Malakhova E. A. Shlyapnikova E. A. (2019). Rapid amplification-free microarray-based ultrasensitive detection of DNA. Anal. Chem. 91, 11209–11214. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02149 Si Y. Xu L. Wang N. Zheng J. Yang R. Li J. (2020). Target MicroRNA-responsive DNA hydrogel-based surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor arrays for MicroRNA-marked cancer screening. Anal. Chem. 92, 2649–2655. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04606 Song G. Zhang R. Jiang X. Liu F. Liu X. (2020a). Nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide as a sensing platform for detection of guanine and application in cell necrosis. Chem. Pap. 74, 89–98. 10.1007/s11696-019-00856-0 Song R. Tian M. Li Y. Liu J. Liu G. (2020b). Detection of MicroRNA based on three-dimensional graphene field-E ® ect transistor biosensor. Nano 15, 1–8. 10.1142/S1793292020500393 Špaček J. Eksin E. Havran L. Erdem A. Fojta M. (2020). Fast enzyme-linked electrochemical sensing of DNA hybridization at pencil graphite electrodes. Application to detect gene deletion in a human cell culture. J. Electroanal. Chem. 862, 113951. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.113951 Stegmann U. E. (2005). Genetic information as instructional content. Philos. Sci. 72, 425–443. 10.1086/498472 Sun J. Xie X. Xie K. Xu S. Jiang S. Ren J. (2019a). Magnetic graphene field-effect transistor biosensor for single-strand DNA detection. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 14, 248–8. 10.1186/s11671-019-3048-1 Sun Y. Cai H. Qiao X. Wang X. (2019b). High-performance polarization control modulated surface plasmon resonance sensor based on monolayer graphene/Au-NPs architecture for detection of DNA hybridization. Meas. Sci. Technol. 30, 125701. 10.1088/1361-6501/ab383a Sun Y. Peng Z. Li H. Wang Z. Mu Y. Zhang G. (2019c). Suspended CNT-Based FET sensor for ultrasensitive and label-free detection of DNA hybridization. Biosens. Bioelectron. 137, 255–262. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.04.054 Tadimety A. Zhang Y. Kready K. M. Palinski T. J. Tsongalis G. J. Zhang J. X. J. (2019). Design of peptide nucleic acid probes on plasmonic gold nanorods for detection of circulating tumor DNA point mutations. Biosens. Bioelectron. 130, 236–244. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.01.045 Tang S. Li Y. Zhu A. Yao Y. Sun J. Zheng F. (2019). A triple-amplification strategy based on the formation of peroxidase-like two-dimensional DNA/Fe3O4 networks initiated by the hybridization chain reaction for highly sensitive detection of microRNA. Chem. Commun. 55, 8386–8389. 10.1039/C9CC03194D Temiz Y. Lovchik R. D. Kaigala G. V. Delamarche E. (2015). Lab-on-a-chip devices: How to close and plug the lab? Microelectron. Eng. 132, 156–175. 10.1016/j.mee.2014.10.013 Tian B. Han Y. Fock J. Strömberg M. Leifer K. Hansen M. F. (2019). Self-Assembled magnetic nanoparticle-graphene oxide nanotag for optomagnetic detection of DNA. ACS Appl. Nano Mat. 2, 1683–1690. 10.1021/acsanm.9b00127 Tian M. (2018). RNA detection based on graphene field-effect transistor biosensor. Adv. Condens. Matter Phys., 27–32. Tian Y. Lu Q. Guo X. Wang S. Gao Y. Wang L. (2020). Au nanoparticles deposited on ultrathin two-dimensional covalent organic framework nanosheets for in vitro and intracellular sensing. Nanoscale 12, 7776–7781. 10.1039/C9NR08220D Tripathy S. Joseph J. Pothuneedi S. Das D. Vanjari S. R. K. Rao A. V. S. S. N. (2019). A miniaturized electrochemical platform with an integrated PDMS reservoir for label-free DNA hybridization detection using nanostructured Au electrodes. Analyst 144, 6953–6961. 10.1039/C9AN01076A Trotter M. Juric D. Bagherian Z. Borst N. Glaser K. Meissner T. (2020). Inkjet-printing of nanoparticle gold and silver ink on cyclic olefin copolymer for DNA-sensing applications. Sensors (Basel) 20, 1–15. 10.3390/s20051333 Verschueren D. V. Pud S. Shi X. De Angelis L. Kuipers L. Dekker C. (2019). Label-free optical detection of DNA translocations through plasmonic nanopores. ACS Nano 13, 61–70. 10.1021/acsnano.8b06758 Vikrant K. Bhardwaj N. Bhardwaj S. K. Kim K. H. Deep A. (2019). Nanomaterials as efficient platforms for sensing DNA. Biomaterials 214, 119215. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.026 Wang H. N. Register J. K. Fales A. M. Gandra N. Cho E. H. Boico A. (2018a). Surface-enhanced Raman scattering nanosensors for in vivo detection of nucleic acid targets in a large animal model. Nano Res. 11, 4005–4016. 10.1007/s12274-018-1982-3 Wang H. Tang H. Yang C. Li Y. (2019a). Selective single molecule nanopore sensing of microRNA using PNA functionalized magnetic core–shell Fe3O4–Au nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 91, 7965–7970. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02025 Wang J. Zhao W.-W. Zhou H. Xu J.-J. Chen H.-Y. (2013). Amplified electrochemiluminescence detection of DNA-binding protein based on the synergy effect of electron and energy transfer between CdS nanocrystals and gold nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 41, 615–620. 10.1016/j.bios.2012.09.041 Wang Q. Zhang B. Xu X. Long F. Wang J. (2018b). CRISPR-typing PCR (ctPCR), a new Cas9-based DNA detection method. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–13. 10.1038/s41598-018-32329-x Wang Q. Zou L. Yang X. Liu X. Nie W. Zheng Y. (2019b). Direct quantification of cancerous exosomes via surface plasmon resonance with dual gold nanoparticle-assisted signal amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 135, 129–136. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.04.013 Wang X. Zhang J. Wei Y. Xing T. Cao T. Wu S. (2020). A copper-based metal–organic framework/graphene nanocomposite for the sensitive and stable electrochemical detection of DNA bases. Analyst 145, 1933–1942. 10.1039/C9AN02398D Wang Z. Jia Y. (2018). Graphene solution-gated field effect transistor DNA sensor fabricated by liquid exfoliation and double glutaraldehyde cross-linking. Carbon N. Y. 130, 758–767. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.078 Watson J. D. Crick F. H. C. (1953). Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 171, 737–738. 10.1038/171737a0 Wilkins M. H. (1956). Physical studies of the molecular structure of deoxyribose nucleic acid and nucleoprotein. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 21, 75–90. 10.1101/sqb.1956.021.01.007 Wu C. Manga Y. B. Yang M. Chien Z. Lee K. (2018). Label-free detection of BRAF V599E gene mutation using side-gated nanowire field effect transistors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, B576–B581. 10.1149/2.0641813jes Wu C. Zhang X. Wang R. Chen L. J. Nie M. Zhang Z. (2022). Low-dimensional material based wearable sensors. Nanotechnology 33, 072001. 10.1088/1361-6528/ac33d1 Wu T. Li X. Fu Y. Ding X. Li Z. Zhu G. (2020a). A highly sensitive and selective fluorescence biosensor for hepatitis C virus DNA detection based on δ-FeOOH and exonuclease III-assisted signal amplification. Talanta 209, 120550. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120550 Wu Y. Choi N. Chen H. Dang H. Chen L. Choo J. (2020b). Performance evaluation of surface-enhanced Raman scattering-polymerase chain reaction sensors for future use in sensitive genetic assays. Anal. Chem. 92, 2628–2634. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04522 Xiao G. Chen B. He M. Li X. Hu B. (2019). A highly sensitive assay of DNA based on inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry detection with gold nanoparticle amplification and isothermal circular strand-displacement polymerization reaction. Talanta 202, 207–213. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.05.018 Xu M. Fu P. Xing S. Zhao Y. Zhao C. (2020a). A PNA-DNA(2) triple-helix molecular switch-based colorimetric sensor for sensitive and specific detection of microRNAs from cancer cells. Chembiochem 21, 2667–2675. 10.1002/cbic.202000155 Xu S. Chang Y. Wu Z. Li Y. Yuan R. Chai Y. (2020b). One DNA circle capture probe with multiple target recognition domains for simultaneous electrochemical detection of miRNA-21 and miRNA-155. Biosens. Bioelectron. 149, 111848. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111848 Yadav P. Cao Z. Barati Farimani A. (2021). DNA detection with single-layer Ti3C2MXene nanopore. ACS Nano 15, 4861–4869. 10.1021/acsnano.0c09595 Yang B. Kong J. Fang X. (2019). Bandage-like wearable flexible microfluidic recombinase polymerase amplification sensor for the rapid visual detection of nucleic acids. Talanta 204, 685–692. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.06.031 Ye H. De S. (2017). Thermal injury of skin and subcutaneous tissues: A review of experimental approaches and numerical models. J. Int. Soc. Burn Inj. 43, 909–932. 10.1016/j.burns.2016.11.014 Yi J. C. Kim Y. J. Kim Y. Y. Lee S. Woo D. H. Kim C. (2019). “Detection of single-stranded DNA using the Dirac voltage change of graphene-based FETs,” in IEEE Region 10 Annual International Conference, Proceedings/TENCON, 2051–2053. 10.1109/TENCON.2019.8929535 Yin Z. Cui H. Shu Q. Jin C. Lin Y. Su J. (2020). Multi-signal amplification electrochemical DNA biosensor based on exonuclease III and tetraferrocene. J. Mat. Chem. B 8, 4143–4150. 10.1039/D0TB00204F You L. Li R. Dong X. Wang F. Guo J. Wang C. (2017). Micron-sized surface enhanced Raman scattering reporter/fluorescence probe encoded colloidal microspheres for sensitive DNA detection. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 488, 109–117. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.086 Zhang D. Yan Y. Que H. Yang T. Cheng X. Ding S. (2020). CRISPR/Cas12a-Mediated interfacial cleaving of hairpin DNA reporter for electrochemical nucleic acid sensing. ACS sensors 5, 557–562. 10.1021/acssensors.9b02461 Zhang H. Fu C. Wu S. Shen Y. Zhou C. Neng J. (2019a). Magnetic-capture-based SERS detection of multiple serum microRNA biomarkers for cancer diagnosis. Anal. Methods 11, 783–793. 10.1039/C8AY02423E Zhang H. W. Zhang L. Sun X. Zhang Z. R. (2007). Successful transfection of hepatoma cells after encapsulation of plasmid DNA into negatively charged liposomes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 96, 118–124. 10.1002/bit.21146 Zhang J. Ba Y. Liu Q. Zhao L. Wang D. Yang H. (2020). CuBr(2)/EDTA-mediated ATRP for ultrasensitive fluorescence detection of lung cancer DNA. J. Adv. Res. 22, 77–84. 10.1016/j.jare.2019.11.006 Zhang J. Hu S. Wang Z. Jia Y. (2019b). Detection of methylated cytosine on single strand DNA based on immune-functionalized and glutaraldehyde modified liquid exfoliated graphene field effect transistor. Proc. SPIE, 113841D. 10.1117/12.2559509 Zhang J. Song C. Zhou H. Jia J. Dai Y. Cui D. (2020d). A dual signal amplification strategy for the highly sensitive fluorescence detection of nucleic acids. Analyst 145, 1219–1226. 10.1039/c9an02183c Zhang Y Y. Hao L. Zhao Z. Yang X. Wang L. Liu S. (2020). Immuno-DNA binding directed template-free DNA extension and enzyme catalysis for sensitive electrochemical DNA methyltransferase activity assay and inhibitor screening. Analyst 145, 3064–3072. 10.1039/D0AN00008F Zhang Z. Pettinari R. Zhou L. Song Y. Wang M. He L. (2020e). Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical Construction of the 0D/2D heterojunction of Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene nanosheets and iron phthalocyanine quantum dots for the impedimetric aptasensing of. Sensors Actuators B. Chem. 310, 127844. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.127844 Zhao L. Kong D. Wu Z. Liu G. Gao Y. Yan X. (2020). Interface interaction of MoS2 nanosheets with DNA based aptameric biosensor for carbohydrate antigen 15–3 detection. Microchem. J. 155, 104675. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104675 Zheng X. Zhao L. Wen D. Wang X. Yang H. Feng W. (2020). Ultrasensitive fluorescent detection of HTLV-II DNA based on magnetic nanoparticles and atom transfer radical polymerization signal amplification. Talanta 207, 120290. 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120290 Zhou W. Han Y. Beliveau B. J. Gao X. (2020). Combining qdot nanotechnology and DNA nanotechnology for sensitive single-cell imaging. Adv. Mat. 32, 1908410. 10.1002/adma.201908410 Zhou X. Zhu D. Liao Y. Liu W. Liu H. Ma Z. (2014). Synthesis, labeling and bioanalytical applications of a tris(2,2’-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)-based electrochemiluminescence probe. Nat. Protoc. 9, 1146–1159. 10.1038/nprot.2014.060 Zhou Y. Jiang W. Wu H. Liu F. Yin H. Lu N. (2019). Amplified electrochemical immunoassay for 5-methylcytosine using a nanocomposite prepared from graphene oxide, magnetite nanoparticles and β-cyclodextrin. Mikrochim. Acta 186, 488. 10.1007/s00604-019-3575-6 Ziółkowski R. Oszwałdowski S. Kopyra K. K. Zacharczuk K. Zasada A. A. Malinowska E. (2020). Toward Fluorimetric-Paired-Emitter-Detector-Diode test for Bacillus anthracis DNA based on graphene oxide. Microchem. J. 154, 104592. 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104592 Zopf D. Pittner A. Dathe A. Grosse N. Csáki A. Arstila K. (2019). Plasmonic nanosensor array for multiplexed dna-based pathogen detection. ACS Sensors 4, 335–343. 10.1021/acssensors.8b01073