<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-4185</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">884502</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2022.884502</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Bioengineering and Biotechnology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Acellular Dermal Matrix Prevents Esophageal Stricture After Full Circumferential Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Porcine Model</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Zhang et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">ADM Stent Prevents Esophageal Stricture</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Baozhen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Yue</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Yidan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Fan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1235418/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sheng</surname>
<given-names>Shiyun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Zhe</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1367558/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>Xiaoying</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Jianyu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Jintao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1695432/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Siyu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1436245/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Gastroenterology</institution>, <institution>Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Shenyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Pathology</institution>, <institution>Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Shenyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Medical Transformation Department</institution>, <institution>Micro-Tech (Nanjing) Co. Ltd.</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/126674/overview">Feng-Huei Lin</ext-link>, National Taiwan University, Taiwan</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/967214/overview">Wenjun Kou</ext-link>, Northwestern University, United States</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1558478/overview">Yoshiki Sakaguchi</ext-link>, University of Tokyo Hospital, Japan</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Jintao Guo, <email>yuefan_0225@163.com</email>; Siyu Sun, <email>sun-siyu@163.com</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>884502</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>14</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Zhang, Zhang, Wang, Yang, Sheng, Wang, Chang, Wei, Guo and Sun.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhang, Zhang, Wang, Yang, Sheng, Wang, Chang, Wei, Guo and Sun</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Esophageal stricture is a common complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), especially in full circumferential ESD. This study investigated fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS) placement with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for preventing post-ESD esophageal stricture. Twelve Bama minipigs were randomly divided into two groups, which underwent full circumferential ESD in the distal esophagus. In group A, an FCSEMS with ADM was placed at the mucosal defect, whereas group B underwent standard FCSEMS placement. The stent was removed during gastroscopy 2 weeks after the ESD procedure. At the fourth week, gastroscopy was repeated to evaluate local healing and stenosis. The animals were sacrificed, esophageal specimens were obtained for macroscopic and histological evaluation, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were quantified. Four weeks post ESD<bold>,</bold> dysphagia occurrence was lesser in group A than in group B. Group A demonstrated lesser esophageal stricture on macroscopic evaluation (21.02 &#xb1; 16.65% vs. 57.41 &#xb1; 8.48%, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.001) in the form of enhanced re-epithelization (99.13 &#xb1; 0.98% vs. 96.63 &#xb1; 1.64%, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.009), diminished submucosal fibrosis (1117.53 &#xb1; 188.83 um vs. 1834.69 &#xb1; 421.99 um, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.003), and attenuated inflammatory infiltration (121.00 &#xb1; 30.66 vs. 188.17 &#xb1; 64.92, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.045). The increase in the serum CRP level was lower in group A than in group B at 4&#xa0;weeks post-ESD. FCSEMS combined with ADM can enhance re-epithelization in the process of wound healing and significantly reduce the degree of esophageal stenosis after circumferential ESD. This study provided important preclinical findings for subsequent clinical trials.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>acellular dermal matrix</kwd>
<kwd>fully covered self-expanding metal stents</kwd>
<kwd>endoscopic submucosal dissection</kwd>
<kwd>esophageal stricture</kwd>
<kwd>regenerative medicine</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Esophageal cancer is a common malignant tumor of the digestive tract (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Qiu et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Sung et al., 2021</xref>). With advancements in endoscopic technologies, more esophageal diseases can be diagnosed and treated through endoscopy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Rabinowitz et al., 2020a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Rabinowitz et al., 2020b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Tang et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Hoibian et al., 2021</xref>). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become the preferred therapy for early intramucosal esophageal cancers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Probst et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Qi et al., 2018</xref>), especially because the R0 resection rates are higher. However, the cardinal long-term complication of ESD is esophageal stricture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Mizuta et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Isomoto et al., 2013</xref>). In particular, an esophageal mucosal defect occupying more than three-quarters of the lesion circumference is an independent risk factor for esophageal stricture after ESD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Tang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>). It is worth noting that almost all patients who undergo full circumferential ESD eventually develop esophageal stenosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Yu et al., 2019</xref>). Currently, the rate of esophageal stricture prevention is unsatisfactory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Bhatt and Mehta 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Zhang et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>With tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches, including the use of biologic scaffolds or cell-based therapies, researchers are exploring treatments that can reconstruct structurally and functionally normal tissues. One of such novel treatments comprises the use of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM)&#x2014;a type of bioresorbable membrane&#x2014;that showed effectiveness in previous animal experiments for providing local coverage of the mucosal defect in preventing esophageal stenosis after hemi-circumferential ESD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Han et al., 2017</xref>). Nevertheless, stenosis after full circumferential ESD requires viable solutions, and the effectiveness of ADM in circumferential ESD could not be verified until now. The application of an ADM in full circumferential ESD is challenging, because ADM fixation in a circumferential excision wound is difficult.</p>
<p>Therefore, we developed a new type of fully-covered self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMS) with an attached ADM and aimed to evaluate its feasibility of application and efficacy for esophageal stenosis prevention after full circumferential ESD in a porcine model.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>Study Design</title>
<p>All animals were either assigned into group A (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 6) or group B (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 6) using a random digits table. Animals in both groups underwent full circumferential esophageal ESD. Immediately after the ESD procedure, endoscopic placement of FCSEMS with ADM was conducted in group A, whereas standard FCSEMS placement was performed in group B. Prior to the procedure, we conducted tests to validate that the formation of esophageal stenosis could be established post-ESD without any intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Animals</title>
<p>The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University (No. 2021PS030K). Male Bama mini pigs weighing between 12 and 15&#xa0;kg received a 48-h half-liquid diet, and fasted for 24-h before the procedure. Thereafter, animals were obtained by the Laboratory Animal Science Department of Shengjing Hospital. Anesthesia was induced by an intravenous propofol injection; venous access was established through the marginal ear vein. Ventilation was maintained via endotracheal intubation. All procedures were performed with the animals under continuous electrocardiographic monitoring.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Circumferential Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection</title>
<p>The anesthetized mini pigs were placed in the left lateral position. All the procedures were performed using a gastroscope (EPK-I, Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) with a transparent cap. We marked the circumference of the lesion on both the cranial and caudal sides of the esophagus, at approximately 30&#xa0;cm distance from the incisors. Following a submucosal injection of methylene blue and saline, submucosal dissection of 1-cm-length was performed on the local mucosa using a triangular knife (KD-640L, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1A&#x2013;F</xref>). Hot coagulation forceps (FD-410LR, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were used for ensuring hemostasis.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Representative illustrations and corresponding endoscopic views of the ESD procedure and FCSEMS with ADM placement and removal. <bold>(A&#x2013;B)</bold> We marked the full circumference on both the cranial and caudal sides, at approximately 30-cm distance from the incisors. <bold>(C&#x2013;D)</bold> Submucosal injection of methylene blue and saline between the full circumferential markings of the cranial and caudal sides of an esophageal lesion. <bold>(E&#x2013;F)</bold> Submucosal dissection performed with a triangular knife. <bold>(G&#x2013;H)</bold> Placement of a guidewire under endoscopic guidance after full circumferential ESD. <bold>(I&#x2013;J)</bold> A stent conveyer is inserted along with the guidewire, and the FCSEMS with ADM was placed by driving the stent conveyer. <bold>(K&#x2013;L)</bold> Outcome of FCSEMS with ADM placement. <bold>(M&#x2013;N)</bold> Stent removal using forceps. FCSEMS, fully covered self-expanding metal stent; ADM, acellular dermal matrix.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-10-884502-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Preparation of Fully Covered Self-Expanding Metal Stent With Acellular Dermal Matrix and Stent Placement</title>
<p>The ADM membrane (Yantai Zhenghai Bio-tech Co., Ltd., Yantai, China) has been derived from meshed bovine skin, which was sterilized and decellularized using proprietary bioengineering methods. We used the ADM membrane to cover the wound post-ESD using an esophageal FCSEMS (Micro-Tech [Nanjing] Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2A,B</xref>). A standard FCSEMS device was also procured from Micro-Tech (Nanjing) Co., Ltd. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2C</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Representative images showing FCSEMS with ADM and standard FCSEMS. <bold>(A,B)</bold> Outcome of FCSEMS with ADM: FCSEMS is covered by the ADM in the middle and upper part of the stent and is inserted in the stent conveyer. <bold>(C)</bold> The appearance of FCSEMS. FCSEMS, fully covered self-expanding metal stent; ADM, acellular dermal matrix.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-10-884502-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Immediately after full circumferential ESD, a guidewire was placed under the endoscope, the endoscope was pulled out, and a stent conveyer (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s12">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>) was introduced along with the guidewire for stent placement. The endoscope was reinserted to observe if the stent was positioned to cover the mucosal defect (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1G&#x2013;L</xref>) completely.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Care and Stent Removal</title>
<p>Intravenous antibiotics (sulperazon, 0.75&#xa0;g/d) were administered to all animals for 1&#xa0;day and a proton pump inhibitor (esomeprazole, 40&#xa0;mg/d) was administered for 3&#xa0;days post-ESD. The minipigs were fasted for 24&#xa0;h after the ESD, and liquid diet was resumed on the second day post-ESD. A soft diet was provided for a week, which was gradually transitioned to a solid diet. Endoscopy was performed 2&#xa0;weeks post-ESD, and the stent was removed using forceps in both groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1M,N</xref>). A repeat gastroscopy was performed at week 4 post-ESD, after which all the minipigs were sacrificed using an overdose of propofol, and the esophagus of each minipig was retrieved for further assessment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Evaluation and Follow-Up</title>
<sec id="s2-6-1">
<title>General Condition</title>
<p>For each animal, experienced veterinarians assessed the weight change, daily food intake, and vomiting status on a regular basis. Dysphagia severity was estimated using the Mellow-Pinkas dysphagia score (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Kim et al., 2015</xref>) (0 &#x3d; no dysphagia; 1 &#x3d; dysphagia to normal solids; 2 &#x3d; dysphagia to soft solids; 3 &#x3d; dysphagia to solids and liquids; and 4 &#x3d; complete dysphagia, even to saliva).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6-2">
<title>Endoscopic Evaluation</title>
<p>Gastroscopic evaluation of the esophageal stricture was performed, wherein mini pigs with dysphagia that resisted routine endoscope insertion (EPK-I, Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) into the esophagus were considered to have an esophageal stricture.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6-3">
<title>Macroscopic Evaluation</title>
<p>The harvested esophagus was incised longitudinally and fixed on a foam board, after which a macroscopic specimen was evaluated. The degree of esophageal stricture (%) was calculated as follows:<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Extent</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>of</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>esophageal</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>stricture</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>%</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>50</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>%</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>a</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>b</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xd7;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>where L<sub>max</sub> represents the length of the narrowest regenerative mucosal short axis and L<sub>a</sub> and L<sub>b</sub> are the lengths of the normal mucosal short axes on the cranial and caudal sides of the esophageal specimen, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Tang et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6-4">
<title>Histological Analysis</title>
<p>Following the macroscopic evaluation, the esophageal specimens were fixed in a 10% formalin buffered solution, embedded in paraffin, processed into sections, and then stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson&#x2019;s trichrome. A senior pathologist, blinded to the treatment groups, analyzed all the slides. The border between the re-epithelialized tissue and the original mucosal epithelium was identified by the lack of muscularis mucosal tissue. The proportion of ESD ulceration covered with re-epithelialized tissue was evaluated using the below formula:<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ratio</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>of</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>re</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2010;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>epithelization</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>%</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>RL</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>DL</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xd7;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>%</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>where RL and DL represent the lengths of the re-epithelialized tissue and the dissected mucosal long axis, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Tang et al., 2018</xref>). The presence of fibrosis in the submucosal layer was indicated by the maximal thickness of the submucosal fibrotic tissue in the vertical direction. Semiquantitative analysis of the inflammatory cells was performed at 400 &#x00D7; magnification. Inflammatory cells between the epithelium and the muscular layer were counted in each of five randomly selected high-power fields (HPFs).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6-5">
<title>Pro-Inflammatory Marker Level Measurement</title>
<p>Blood samples were obtained at day 0, week 2, and week 4 post-ESD to measure the serum levels of the pro-inflammatory marker, CRP, in each specimen.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-7">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, United States) and Microsoft Office 2019 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, United States). Figures were prepared using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, United States). Data are presented as mean &#xb1; standard deviation or count (percentage). Comparisons between groups were performed using the Student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test or Fisher&#x2019;s exact test. A <italic>p</italic>-value &#x3c; 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Procedure Results</title>
<p>In the study, 12 male Bama minipigs weighing 13.34 &#xb1; 1.44&#xa0;kg were randomly assigned into group A (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 6) or group B (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 6). <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> presents the results of procedure. Full circumferential ESD was successfully performed in both groups (12/12, 100%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A,E</xref>). The mean length of the longitudinal esophageal mucosal defect in all minipigs was 2.58 &#xb1; 0.51&#xa0;cm. All the animals in groups A and B survived postoperatively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the lengths of mucosal defect, duration of ESD and stent placement (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4A,B</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>ESD procedure and stent placement data in both groups.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left">Group A (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 6)</th>
<th align="left">Group B (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 6)</th>
<th align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-Value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Mucosal defect length (cm)</td>
<td align="center">2.67 &#xb1; 0.52</td>
<td align="center">2.50 &#xb1; 0.55</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.599<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">ESD procedure time (min)</td>
<td align="center">7.66 &#xb1; 4.13</td>
<td align="center">10.21 &#xb1; 3.67</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.284<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Stent placement time (min)</td>
<td align="center">4.52 &#xb1; 1.91</td>
<td align="center">3.03 &#xb1; 0.70</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.102<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">En bloc resection</td>
<td align="center">6 (100%)</td>
<td align="center">5 (83.33%)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.500<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Bleeding</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">1 (16.67%)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.500<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Perforation</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>a</label>
<p>Student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn2">
<label>b</label>
<p>Fisher&#x2019;s exact test.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Group A minipigs underwent FCSEMS with ADM placement; Group B minipigs underwent FCSEMS placement.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison between the ADM-FCSEMS group <bold>(A)</bold> and FCSEMS group <bold>(B)</bold> by endoscopic and macroscopic evaluations. <bold>(A,E)</bold> Endoscopic appearance immediately after full circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and stent placement in both groups. <bold>(B,F)</bold> Endoscopic appearance at week 2 post-ESD. No obvious esophageal strictures in groups A and B. <bold>(C,G)</bold> Endoscopic appearance at week 4 post-ESD in groups A and B. A greater esophageal diameter and better patency can be observed on endoscopy in group A than in group B. <bold>(D,H)</bold> Macroscopic views of the harvested esophageal specimen show better wound healing and lesser mucosal contraction in group A than in group B.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-10-884502-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Data comparisons between the ADM-FCSEMS group <bold>(A)</bold> and FCSEMS group <bold>(B)</bold>. Comparisons of the <bold>(A)</bold> ESD procedure time, <bold>(B)</bold> stent placement time, <bold>(C)</bold> weight loss at week 2 post-ESD, <bold>(D)</bold> weight loss at week 4 post-ESD, <bold>(E)</bold> dysphagia score at week 2 post-ESD, <bold>(F)</bold> dysphagia score at week 4 post-ESD, <bold>(G)</bold> stricture degree in the macroscopic evaluation, <bold>(H)</bold> ratio of re-epithelization, <bold>(I)</bold> submucosal fibrosis thickness, <bold>(J)</bold> inflammatory cell counts, <bold>(K)</bold> rise of C-reactive protein (CRP) level at week 2 post-ESD, and <bold>(L)</bold> rise of CRP level at week 4 between both groups. Bars with an asterisk are indicating significant differences [<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.05 (&#x2217;), <italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.01 (&#x2217;&#x2217;)].</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-10-884502-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>General Condition</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4C, D</xref>, there was no significant difference in the weight loss post-ESD between groups A and B at week 2 and week 4. Although the food tolerability post-ESD was comparable between groups A and B at week 2, animals in group A had better food tolerability than those in group B at week 4 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4E,F</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Physical, endoscopic, histologic, and biological comparisons between both groups.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="center">Group A (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 6)</th>
<th align="center">Group B (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 6)</th>
<th align="center">
<italic>p</italic>-Value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left">General condition</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Weight loss (kg, post-ESD wk 2)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.73 &#xb1; 0.84</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.20 &#xb1; 1.34</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.435<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Weight loss (kg, post-ESD wk 4)</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.81 &#xb1; 1.81</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1.38 &#xb1; 1.91</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.701<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Dysphagia score (post-ESD wk 2)</td>
<td align="center">1.17 &#xb1; 0.41</td>
<td align="center">1.67 &#xb1; 0.52</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.092<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Dysphagia score (post-ESD wk 4)</td>
<td align="center">1.83 &#xb1; 1.17</td>
<td align="center">3.50 &#xb1; 0.55</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.010<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left">Endoscopy evaluation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;No. of stricture cases (post-ESD wk 2)</td>
<td align="center">0 (0%)</td>
<td align="center">0 (0%)</td>
<td align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;No. of stricture cases (post-ESD wk 4)</td>
<td align="center">1 (16.67%)</td>
<td align="center">5 (83.33%)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.039<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn4">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left">Macroscopic evaluation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Stricture degree (%)</td>
<td align="center">21.02 &#xb1; 16.65</td>
<td align="center">57.41 &#xb1; 8.48</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left">Histological evaluation</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Ratio of re-epithelization (%)</td>
<td align="center">99.13 &#xb1; 0.98</td>
<td align="center">96.63 &#xb1; 1.64</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.009<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Submucosal fibrosis thickness (um)</td>
<td align="center">1117.53 &#xb1; 188.83</td>
<td align="center">1834.69 &#xb1; 421.99</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.003<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Inflammatory cell counts/ HPF</td>
<td align="center">121.00 &#xb1; 30.66</td>
<td align="center">188.17 &#xb1; 64.92</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.045<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left">CRP levels</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Rise of CRP level (mg/L, post-ESD wk 2)</td>
<td align="center">0.09 &#xb1; 0.19</td>
<td align="center">0.21 &#xb1; 0.19</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.283<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Rise of CRP level (mg/L, post-ESD wk 4)</td>
<td align="center">0.23 &#xb1; 0.21</td>
<td align="center">0.53 &#xb1; 0.19</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.027<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn3">
<label>a</label>
<p>Student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn4">
<label>b</label>
<p>Fisher&#x2019;s exact test.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Group A minipigs underwent FCSEMS with ADM placement; Group B minipigs underwent FCSEMS placement.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; HPF, high-power field; CRP, C-reactive protein; No, number; FCSEMS, fully covered self-expanding metal stent; ADM, acellular dermal matrix.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>Endoscopic Evaluation</title>
<p>From the gastroscopy evaluations, the frequency of esophageal stricture in group A was lower than that in group B at week 4 (16.67 vs. 83.33%, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.039) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3C,G</xref>); however, there was no stricture occurrence in both groups at week 2 (0 vs. 0%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B,F</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>Macroscopic Evaluation</title>
<p>On macroscopic evaluation of esophageal specimens at week 4, the mean reduction in the luminal circumference of the esophagus for groups A and B was 21.02% (range: 1.75&#x2013;49.02%) and 57.41% (range: 48.15&#x2013;73.13%), respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3D, H</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4G</xref>). This outcome was consistent with the dysphagia scores and endoscopic examinations in both groups at week 4 post-ESD.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>Histological Evaluation</title>
<p>All histological results are reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4H&#x2013;J</xref>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5A&#x2013;D</xref>. Group A had a higher re-epithelialization rate than that of group B (99.13 &#xb1; 0.98% vs. 96.63 &#xb1; 1.64%, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.009). The maximum thickness of the fibrosed submucosal layer was significantly smaller in group A than in group B (1117.53 &#xb1; 188.83&#xa0;um vs. 1834.69 &#xb1; 421.99&#xa0;um, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.003). There were fewer inflammatory cells per HPF at the remodeled ESD site in group A than in group B (121.00 &#xb1; 30.66 vs. 188.17 &#xb1; 64.92, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.045).</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Histological comparison of the ADM-FCSEMS group <bold>(A)</bold> and FCSEMS group <bold>(B)</bold>. Hematoxylin-eosin staining reveals <bold>(A)</bold> an ESD wound covered by abundant continuous and integrated neoepithelium in group A (yellow arrows, &#xd7;40) and <bold>(B)</bold> irregular and unattached re-epithelium in the process of wound healing in group B (yellow arrows, &#xd7;40). Masson&#x2019;s trichrome staining demonstrates <bold>(C)</bold> less submucosal fibrosis in group A (yellow arrows, 40&#xd7;) and <bold>(D)</bold> obvious submucosal fibrosis formation and structural disorder in group B (yellow arrows, &#xd7;40).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-10-884502-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>Serum C-Reactive Protein Levels</title>
<p>There was no significant difference in the increase in CRP levels between both groups at week 2 post-ESD (0.09 &#xb1; 0.19&#xa0;mg/L vs. 0.21 &#xb1; 0.19&#xa0;mg/L, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.283) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4K</xref>). At week 4 post-ESD, the increase in CRP levels in group A was significantly smaller than that in group B (0.23 &#xb1; 0.21&#xa0;mg/L vs. 0.53 &#xb1; 0.19&#xa0;mg/L, <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.027) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4L</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Prior to conducting our formal experiment, we first demonstrated that in the absence of intervention, the mucosal defect formed by 1-cm circumferential esophageal ESD could lead to esophageal stenosis in a porcine model. All the mini pigs developed esophageal stricture without the ability to tolerate oral intake, thus requiring euthanasia between postoperative weeks 2 and 3. On endoscopy, we found pinhole strictures and an obvious absence of epithelial tissue at the ESD site (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s12">Supplementary Figures S2A&#x2013;S2B</xref>). Moreover, the pathological assessment of the esophageal specimens revealed a lack of continuous epithelium accompanied by significant submucosal fibrosis (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s12">Supplementary Figures S2C&#x2013;S2D</xref>), suggesting that the establishment of full-circumference ESD by the above method can lead to esophageal stenosis without any intervention.</p>
<p>The allocation of the 12 minipigs was random between both the groups. There were no significant differences in the dysphagia score and stenosis 2&#xa0;weeks after ESD between the two groups. At week 4 post-ESD, the animals in group A had lesser dysphagia score than those in group B. The reduction in the luminal circumference of the esophagus in group A was lower than that in group B, which was in line with the endoscopic results. The macroscopic evaluation indicated that ADM could decrease esophageal mucosal contracture by approximately 40%.</p>
<p>In group A, the pathological analyses revealed a well-regulated neo-epithelium, lesser submucosal layer fibrosis and inflammatory infiltration, and greater re-epithelization rate than those in group B. These findings could be explained by the efficacy of the ADM patch. One possible explanation is that the matrix can trap and bind the recipient&#x2019;s own cells and growth factors, which favors the growth of esophageal epithelial cells and vascularization. Further, this can help achieve rapid epithelialization in the mucosal defect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Rennert et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Xu et al., 2021</xref>). Simultaneously, in the wound area, the matrix can inhibit the fibrotic formation and infiltration towards the deeper muscular layer, which can effectively prevent muscularis propria injury and is important for tissue repair and reconstruction.</p>
<p>Since the mean CRP rise in group A was lower than that in group B at week 4 after ESD, the covering of mucosal defects by ADM may have an anti-inflammatory effect in circulation. The degree of CRP level increase is positively correlated with the degree of infection. Hence, from our comprehensive analysis of the local inflammatory cell counts and general elevation in CRP levels, the ADM patch was deemed capable of attenuating the inflammatory infiltration in the local defect and inflammatory reaction in the circulation. ADM has several potential advantages relating to its source tissue and manufacturing process, which may have contributed to the limited inflammatory response observed in this study. ADM is manufactured with all lipids, fats, carbohydrates, and non-collagen removed, thus retaining only collagen. This can minimize the inflammatory reactions and host immune response, resulting in less tissue damage due to inflammatory cell aggregation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cornwell et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Lantis et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Extrapolating from the evidence in our study, we speculate that ADM limits the formation of scar tissue and reduces esophageal stricture rate, possibly via diminished submucosal fibrosis, enhanced re-epithelization, and attenuated inflammatory cell/mediator infiltration.</p>
<p>This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FCSEMS with ADM for the prevention of esophageal stricture. We conducted a robust post-endoscopic stricture validation with full circumferential wounds in a porcine model, while most studies have utilized a semi-circumferential ESD or smaller wounds. Moreover, ADM and FCSEMS were stably consolidated, and ADM could be placed at the wound site with the stent intraoperatively, where no metal clip or fibrin glue was required to secure the ADM graft attachment, which greatly decreased the complexity of ADM application. Simultaneously, we carried out a longer observation period (4 weeks) for acquiring more data.</p>
<p>While ESD is a common treatment option for early esophageal cancer, post-procedure stenosis has remained as its primary limitation. Moreover, the mechanisms underlying the development of an esophageal stricture post ESD remain to be comprehensively elucidated. Typically, the repair of post-ESD esophageal mucosal defect involves three phases: inflammatory response, epithelial proliferation, and extracellular matrix remodeling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Broughton et al., 2006</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Honda et al. (2010)</xref> performed an animal study, from which they speculated that fibrosis formation occurs in the submucosal and muscularis propria during the mucosal defect healing process, which results in the decrease of the esophageal wall elasticity and movement. Consequently, esophageal stenosis is formed following this cascade. Thus, an effective prophylactic maneuver for an esophageal stricture is aimed at maintaining or re-establishing wound equilibrium and allowing the satisfactory healing process to occur by inhibiting the inflammatory response, promoting epithelial regeneration, and preventing muscularis propria injury.</p>
<p>Currently, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches are targeted toward the reconstruction of structurally and functionally normal tissues, including tissue shielding methods with polyglycolic acid (PGA) sheets and fibrin glue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Sakaguchi et al., 2016</xref>), or autologous tissue transplantation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chai et al., 2019</xref>). PGA sheet, a biodegradable suture material, can provide plentiful cytoskeletons that help in drug loading and cell crawling during the repair process, thereby leading to a decreased risk of scar germination and stricture formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chai et al., 2018</xref>). Nevertheless, these approaches require laborious methods to prepare shielding materials, and are associated with an unstable and complex technology.</p>
<p>ADM is a soft tissue graft created by the decellularization of tissue, which leaves the extracellular matrix in its original undamaged state while removing all materials which could potentially trigger a host immune response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cornwell et al., 2009</xref>). In the current study, the ADM was available from bovine dermis, containing predominantly type I collagen. Additionally, it is produced under aseptic conditions, ensuring that the allograft is sterile. The ADM has been used successfully for wound healing and tissue repair, as well as tissue reconstruction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Jansen et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kirsner et al., 2015</xref>). However, few studies have focused on the repair of the gastrointestinal mucosal layer, particularly that of the esophagus. In our preliminary study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Han et al., 2017</xref>), we demonstrated the safety and efficacy of placing ADM with metal clips in a porcine model to prevent esophageal stricture formation after a semi-circumferential ESD; however, it was difficult to fix the ADM patch with metal clips on the circumferential wound.</p>
<p>Maintaining the organ morphology is of great significance for organ regeneration <italic>in vivo</italic>. To facilitate wound healing, the esophagus must be maintained in a tubular form for a certain period. Thus, the current study emphasizes how the ADM patch can be grafted on full circumferential wounds stably and easily, and how the esophageal tubular structure can be maintained. Therefore, we developed a novel stent, the ADM-FCSEMS, which provides the advantage of extraordinary water solubility of the ADM, which allows the adherence to moist wound surfaces with great rapidity. Therefore, no clip or fibrin glue is needed to secure sheet attachment. Additionally, ADM increases friction and adhesion between the stent and wound against stent migration, and the FCSEMS provides a radial force, which fixes the ADM in a stable manner and maintains the esophagus in a tubular form with minimal deformities.</p>
<p>The study was designed and conducted with careful attention to every process and material used; however, there were still several limitations. First, cases of mucosal defects formed after circumferential ESD with 2&#x2013;3&#xa0;cm lengths are uncommon in actual clinical settings. Considering the limited esophageal length in miniature pigs and our successful validation of stricture formation, we decided to resect 1-cm-long mucosa in the study. A mucosal defect of approximately 2-cm was formed due to esophageal ductility. Second, the consideration of weight variation as an evaluation outcome was imprecise, and despite development of obvious dysphagia at week 4 in Group B, weight loss in both groups was statistically insignificant. In addition, there was still one case of stenosis in group A at week 4, which may be related to the lack of new epithelium with sufficient thickness. Hence, our following study would focus on whether 2&#xa0;weeks of stenting is appropriate and whether a longer period of stenting is needed.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, FCSEMS with ADM effectively prevented post-ESD esophageal stenosis possibly by the following mechanisms: diminished submucosal fibrosis, enhanced re-epithelization, and attenuated inflammatory cell/mediator infiltration at the microscopic level. We estimate that our results could provide important preclinical experience for subsequent clinical trials. Planning is underway for a first-in-human study to assess the feasibility of ADM-FCSEMS placement for the prevention of post-ESD esophageal stricture in patients with early esophageal cancer.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>BZ, JG and SS designed and coordinated the study; BZ, YZ, YW and JG performed the experiments, acquired and analyzed the data; BZ, YZ, YW, FY, SS, ZW, XC, JW, JG and SS were involved in the interpretation of the data and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; BZ and JG drafted the article; All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study received funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81900601), University innovation team and innovative talent support program of Liaoning Province (Grant No. LR2019073), and Young and middle-aged science and technology innovation talent Program (Grant No. RC200438).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s10">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>JW is an employee of the Medical Transformation Department of Micro-Tech (Nanjing) Co., Ltd., and he assisted the team in making ADM stents. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s11">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We thank Professor Si-yu Sun, the co-corresponding author of this article, for his support and guidance to this study, as well as all other doctors, nurses and dedicated animals who participated in this experiment. Moreover, we specially thank Ji-tong Jiang for her contribution to animal experiments.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s12">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.884502/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.884502/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.PDF" id="SM1" mimetype="application/PDF" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhatt</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehta</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Stricture Prevention after Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection</article-title>. <source>Gastrointest. Endosc.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>1187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1189</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.005</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Broughton</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
<suffix>2nd</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Janis</surname>
<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Attinger</surname>
<given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The Basic Science of Wound Healing</article-title>. <source>Plastic Reconstr. Surg.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>12S</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34S</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.prs.0000225430.42531.c2</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname>
<given-names>N.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L.-S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>S.-Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of Polyglycolic Acid Sheet Plus Esophageal Stent Placement in Preventing Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Early-Stage Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled Trial</article-title>. <source>World J. Gastroenterol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>1046</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1055</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3748/wjg.v24.i9.1046</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linghu</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Autologous Skin-Grafting Surgery to Prevent Esophageal Stenosis after Complete Circular Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Neoplasms</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Gastroenterol.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>822</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>825</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14309/ajg.0000000000000169</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cornwell</surname>
<given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Landsman</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>James</surname>
<given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Extracellular Matrix Biomaterials for Soft Tissue Repair</article-title>. <source>Clin. Podiatric Med. Surg.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>507</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>523</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cpm.2009.08.001</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Acellular Dermal Matrix for Esophageal Stricture Prevention after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Porcine Model</article-title>. <source>Gastrointest. Endosc.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>1160</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1167</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.038</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoibian</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giovannini</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Autret</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pesenti</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bories</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ratone</surname>
<given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Preoperative EUS Evaluation of the Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Gastric and Esophagogastric Junction Cancer Is Correlated with Survival: A Single Retrospective Study of 97 Patients</article-title>. <source>Endosc. Ultrasound</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/EUS-D-20-00073</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Honda</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakamura</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hori</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shionoya</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakada</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sato</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Process of Healing of Mucosal Defects in the Esophagus after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Histological Evaluation in a Dog Model</article-title>. <source>Endoscopy</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>1092</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1095</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-0030-1255741</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Isomoto</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamaguchi</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minami</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakao</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Management of Complications Associated with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection/ Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Esophageal Cancer</article-title>. <source>Dig. Endosc.</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>Suppl. 1</issue>), <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01388.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jansen</surname>
<given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Caigny</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guay</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lineaweaver</surname>
<given-names>W. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shokrollahi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The Evidence Base for the Acellular Dermal Matrix AlloDerm: A Systematic Review</article-title>. <source>Ann. Plast. Surg.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>594</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827a2d23</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lim</surname>
<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Im</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jung</surname>
<given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Stents in Patients with Malignant Esophageal Obstruction According to Palliative Additional Treatment</article-title>. <source>J. Dig. Dis.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>575</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>584</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1751-2980.12280</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kirsner</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bohn</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Driver</surname>
<given-names>V. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mills</surname>
<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
<suffix>Sr</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nanney</surname>
<given-names>L. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Human Acellular Dermal Wound Matrix: Evidence and Experience</article-title>. <source>Int. Wound J.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>646</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>654</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/iwj.12185</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lantis</surname>
<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Snyder</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reyzelman</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Gils</surname>
<given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sigal</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vayser</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Fetal Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Closure of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial</article-title>. <source>J. Wound Care</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>S18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S27</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup7.S18</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mizuta</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nishimori</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuratani</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Higashidani</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kohsaki</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Onishi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Predictive Factors for Esophageal Stenosis after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer</article-title>. <source>Dis. Esophagus</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>626</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>631</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00954.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Probst</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aust</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe4;rkl</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anthuber</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Messmann</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Early Esophageal Cancer in Europe: Endoscopic Treatment by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection</article-title>. <source>Endoscopy</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-0034-1391086</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname>
<given-names>Z.-P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>L.-Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Esophageal Cancer in Elderly Patients with Relative Indications for Endoscopic Treatment</article-title>. <source>Endoscopy</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>839</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>845</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/a-0577-2560</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Burden in China: A Time-Trend Analysis and Comparison with the United States and United Kingdom Based on the Global Epidemiological Data Released in 2020</article-title>. <source>Cancer Commun. (Lond)</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>1037</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1048</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cac2.12197</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rabinowitz</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grossman</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ebigbo</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020a</year>). <article-title>Predicting Pediatric Esophageal Wall Thickness: An EUS Study</article-title>. <source>Endosc. Ultrasound</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>266</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/eus.eus_15_20</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rabinowitz</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grossman</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gress</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020b</year>). <article-title>Potential Pitfalls in Diagnostic EUS of the Esophagus</article-title>. <source>Endosc. Ultrasound</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>272</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>273</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/eus.eus_22_20</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rennert</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sorkin</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garg</surname>
<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Januszyk</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gurtner</surname>
<given-names>G. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Cellular Response to a Novel Fetal Acellular Collagen Matrix: Implications for Tissue Regeneration</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Biomater.</source> <volume>2013</volume>, <fpage>527957</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2013/527957</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sakaguchi</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsuji</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fujishiro</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kataoka</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takeuchi</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yakabi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Triamcinolone Injection and Shielding with Polyglycolic Acid Sheets and Fibrin Glue for Postoperative Stricture Prevention after Esophageal Endoscopic Resection: A Pilot Study</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Gastroenterol.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ajg.2016.60</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sung</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferlay</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siegel</surname>
<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laversanne</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soerjomataram</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jemal</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries</article-title>. <source>CA A Cancer J. Clin.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>249</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3322/caac.21660</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Dysphagia Caused by a Rare Esophageal External Compression Lesion (With Video)</article-title>. <source>Endosc. Ultrasound</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/eus.eus_26_20</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Independent Risk Factors for Esophageal Refractory Stricture after Extensive Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection</article-title>. <source>Surg. Endosc.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>3618</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3627</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00464-020-07840-w</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Deployment of Carboxymethyl Cellulose Sheets to Prevent Esophageal Stricture after Full Circumferential Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Porcine Model</article-title>. <source>Dig. Endosc.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>608</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>615</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/den.13070</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Human-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix May Be an Alternative to Autologous Grafts in Tympanic Membrane Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>J. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck Surg.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40463-021-00518-w</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Strategies to Prevent Stricture after Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection</article-title>. <source>Ann. Transl. Med.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21037/atm.2019.05.45</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>B.-Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.-D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Stent Placement to Prevent Strictures after Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>Dis. Esophagus</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>doab015</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/dote/doab015</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Advances in the Prevention and Treatment of Esophageal Stricture after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Esophageal Cancer</article-title>. <source>J. Transl. Int. Med.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>145</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/jtim-2020-0022</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>