<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-4185</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">792893</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2021.792893</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Bioengineering and Biotechnology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Gelatin/Polycaprolactone Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes: The Effect of Composition and Physicochemical Properties on Postoperative Cardiac Adhesion</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Wang et&#x20;al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">Gelatin/Polycaprolactone Composition on Postoperative Adhesion</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Xingang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname>
<given-names>Li</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>Yongxuan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname>
<given-names>Zihao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Yuqing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>Xiaoting</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Xingliang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Hao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/923561/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>Bei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Shanghai Institute of Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease, Shanghai Children&#x2019;s Medical Center, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Children&#x2019;s Heart Center, Institute of Cardiovascular Development and Translational Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children&#x2019;s Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University</institution>, <addr-line>Wenzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/989982/overview">Guicai Li</ext-link>, Nantong University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1145786/overview">Shige Wang</ext-link>, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1519812/overview">Hui Wang</ext-link>, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute (CAS), China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Hao Zhang, <email>drzhanghao@126.com</email>; Bei Feng, <email>fengbei04@163.com</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn1">
<label>
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</label>
<p>These authors have contributed equally to this&#x20;work</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Biomaterials, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>06</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>792893</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>11</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>08</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2021 Wang, Xiang, Peng, Dai, Hu, Pan, Zhou, Zhang and Feng.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Xiang, Peng, Dai, Hu, Pan, Zhou, Zhang and Feng</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these&#x20;terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Cardiovascular diseases have become a major threat to human health. The adhesion formation is an inevitable pathophysiological event after cardiac surgery. We have previously shown that gelatin/polycaprolactone (GT/PCL, mass ratio 50:50) electrospun nanofibrous membranes have high potential in preventing postoperative cardiac adhesion, but the effect of GT:PCL composition on anti-adhesion efficacy was not investigated. Herein, nanofibrous membranes with different GT:PCL mass ratios of 0:100, 30:70, 50:50, and 70:30 were prepared via electrospinning. The 70:30 membrane failed to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion, overly high GT contents significantly deteriorated the mechanical properties, which complicated the suturing during surgery and hardly maintained the structural integrity after implantation. Unexpectedly, the 0:100 membrane (no gelatin contained) could not effectively prevent either, since its large pore size allowed the penetration of numerous inflammatory cells to elicit a severe inflammatory response. Only the GT:PCL 50:50 membrane exhibited excellent mechanical properties, good biocompatibility and effective anti-cell penetration ability, which could serve as a physical barrier to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion and might be suitable for other biomedical applications such as wound healing, guided tissue or bone regeneration.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>electrospinning</kwd>
<kwd>gelatin</kwd>
<kwd>polycaprolactone</kwd>
<kwd>postoperative adhesion</kwd>
<kwd>cardiac surgery</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Highlights</title>
<p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; The 70:30 membrane (high gelatin contained) failed to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion in view of its poor mechanical properties.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; The 0:100 membrane (no gelatin contained) was not suitable to prevent postoperative adhesion either because of its large pore&#x20;size.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>&#x2022; Only the 50:50 membrane effectively prevented postoperative adhesion and showed great potential in wound healing, guided tissue or bone regeneration.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Cardiovascular diseases have become a major threat to human health, accounting for nearly 31% of deaths worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Leong et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>). The rapid development of interventional therapy and novel drugs has helped a lot to these diseases; nevertheless, surgical treatments still remain essential to many complex heart diseases. Thus, the formation of adhesions between the chest wall and epicardium is an inevitable postoperative pathophysiological event after cardiac surgery. Adhesions caused by the initial surgery make the original anatomical structure disappear or become much more complicated, which increases the risks during reoperations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Shen and Xu, 2014</xref>). The prevention of postoperative cardiac adhesion can greatly reduce the reoperative difficulties, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, surgery time and costs, and even mortality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lassaletta et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>Among the strategies adopted to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesions (e.g., pharmacological intervention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lopes et&#x20;al., 2009</xref>) or physical barriers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">de Oliveira et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>)), using biomaterial-based membranes is believed to be the most promising one. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is possibly the most extensively utilized and evaluated membrane used to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Minale et&#x20;al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Jacobs et&#x20;al., 1996</xref>), but it has not been routinely applied in clinic due to certain shortages such as non-degradability, chronic foreign-body reactions, and predispose to infection over time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ozeren et&#x20;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Tsukihara et&#x20;al., 2006</xref>). Furthermore, several reports have shown that ePTFE membranes may cause severe adhesions and prominent inflammatory reactions as well (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Naito et&#x20;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Kaushal et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Electrospinning has become a widely applied method to fabricate nanofibers due to its cost-effectiveness, simplicity, and suitability for mass production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Xue et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Keshvardoostchokami et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Xu et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). Owing to its dense fibrous structure, tiny pore size, controllable mechanical properties, and adjustable degradation rate, the electrospun nanofibrous membrane has shown great potential in preventing postoperative adhesions as a physical barrier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alimohammadi et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mao et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). In our pilot study, we have discovered the elelctrospun GT/PCL (mass ratio 50:50) nanofibrous membrane might become a promising barrier to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Feng et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). However, the GT:PCL composition could affect the mechanical properties, physical structure, biocompatibility, and degradation rate of membranes, and therefore might eventually influence their anti-adhesion efficacy. For instance, Ghasemi et&#x20;al. reported that compared with GT:PCL 0:100 and 50:50, 30:70 nanofibrous membranes exhibited the most balanced properties to meet&#x20;all required specifications for nerve regeneration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ghasemi-Mobarakeh et&#x20;al., 2008</xref>). While Zheng et&#x20;al. demonstrated that the high PCL content in GT/PCL membranes was unfavorable for 3-D cartilage regeneration and 70:30 might be a relatively suitable ratio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zheng et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Herein, we fabricated four nanofibrous membranes with different GT:PCL mass ratios of 0:100, 30:70, 50:50, and 70:30 via electrospinning, and comprehensively evaluated their physicochemical properties, biocompatibility, heart/liver/kidney functions, CRP/immunoglobulin levels, and anti-adhesion performance to determine the most optimal composition and provide a strong theoretical basis for the clinical development and applications of these related membranes. Pure GT membrane was not considered since it failed to maintain the structural integrity owing to its poor mechanical properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Nagarajan et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>2 Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>2.1 Materials</title>
<p>GT type A (V900863, 300 Bloom from porcine skin), PCL (440744, average <italic>M</italic>
<sub>w</sub> &#x3d; 80,000&#xa0;Da), acetic acid (HAc; 338826, &#x2265;99.8%), and 2, 2, 2-trifluoroethanol (TFE; T63002, &#x2265;99.0%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (United&#x20;States) and were used as received without further purification. Dulbecco&#x2019;s modified Eagle medium nutrient mix F12 (DMEM/F12, 11330033), fetal bovine serum (FBS; 10099-141C), penicillin-streptomycin (15140-122), and trypsin (25200-056) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (United&#x20;States). Anti-cardiac troponin T (ab45932) and anti-vimentin (ab92547) primary antibodies were purchased from Abcam (United&#x20;Kingdom). Anti-rabbit IgG fluorescent secondary antibody (4412S) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (United&#x20;States). 4&#x2032;, 6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; C1002) was purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology (China). The neonatal rat/mouse cardiomyocyte isolation kit (nc-6031) was purchased from Cellutron Life Technologies (United&#x20;States). Live/dead cell viability assay kits (L3224) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (United&#x20;States). Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; CK04) was purchased from Dojindo Laboratories (Kumamoto, Japan). A modified hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) staining kit (G1121) was purchased from Solarbio Technology (China).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>2.2 Membrane Preparation</title>
<p>GT and PCL with mass ratios of 30:70, 50:50, and 70:30 were dissolved in TFE to produce a total concentration of 10% (w/v), and the solution was supplemented with a small amount of HAc (0.2 vol%) to obtain a transparent GT/PCL solution. In the case of pure-PCL membrane, PCL was dissolved in TFE at a concentration of 12% (w/v) without HAc. After 48-h stirring, the solutions were filled into a 10-ml syringe with a blunt needle (20G) and fed into the electrospinning device at 2&#xa0;ml/h using a syringe pump (KDS100, KD Scientific, United&#x20;States). A rotating stainless-steel drum (diameter &#x3d; 5&#xa0;cm, rotation speed &#x3d; 100&#xa0;rpm) was used as a collector to prepare membranes with uniform thickness. A high voltage (TXR1020N30-30, Teslaman, China) was applied between the needle tip and grounded collector, with the distance between tip and collector maintained at 13&#xa0;cm. Other detailed electrospinning parameters in fabrication of different GT/PCL nanofibrous membranes were listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>. Aluminum foil was wrapped on the collector before electrospinning to facilitate membrane collection and tailoring. The obtained membranes were placed in a vacuum oven for at least 1&#xa0;week to remove the residual solvent for subsequent&#x20;use.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Parameters used for electrospinning nanofibrous membranes of GT/PCL.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Membranes (GT:PCL)</th>
<th align="center">Concentration (%)</th>
<th align="center">Applied voltage (KV)</th>
<th align="center">Temperature (&#xb0;C)</th>
<th align="center">Humidity (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">0:100</td>
<td align="center">12&#xa0;w/v</td>
<td align="center">8&#x2013;9</td>
<td align="center">20&#x2013;25</td>
<td align="center">40&#x2013;60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">30:70</td>
<td align="center">10&#xa0;w/v</td>
<td align="center">13&#x2013;14</td>
<td align="center">20&#x2013;25</td>
<td align="center">40&#x2013;60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">50:50</td>
<td align="center">10&#xa0;w/v</td>
<td align="center">14&#x2013;15</td>
<td align="center">20&#x2013;25</td>
<td align="center">40&#x2013;60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">70:30</td>
<td align="center">10&#xa0;w/v</td>
<td align="center">15&#x2013;16</td>
<td align="center">20&#x2013;25</td>
<td align="center">40&#x2013;60</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>2.3 Membrane Characterization</title>
<p>Membrane morphologies were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM-5600LV, JEOL, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 10&#xa0;kV. Prior to imaging, the membranes were sputter-coated with Pt for 60&#xa0;s to increase their conductivity. Fiber diameters and pore sizes were determined from SEM images.</p>
<p>Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded on an FT-IR spectrometer (Nicolet-Nexus 670, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United&#x20;States) using a scan range of 500&#x2013;4,000&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and a resolution of 2&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>.</p>
<p>Membrane surface hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity was evaluated by a video contact angle analyzer (Attension Theta, Biolin Scientific AB, Finland). Briefly, deionized water droplets (3&#xa0;&#x3bc;L) were automatically dispensed onto the membrane surface, and the dynamic changes in their shape were recorded.</p>
<p>Given that the membranes would be applied in a moist environment at 37&#xb0;C <italic>in vivo</italic>, their post-implantation shrinkage behavior was tested by immersing 1.5&#xa0;cm &#xd7; 1.5&#xa0;cm membrane pieces with attached aluminum foil into physiological saline at 37&#xb0;C. After 24&#xa0;h, the membranes were removed and imaged using a high-resolution camera (EOS 6D, Canon, Japan). For post-implantation mechanical property evaluation, the membranes were cut into 5&#xa0;cm &#xd7; 1&#xa0;cm pieces, immersed into physiological saline at 37&#xb0;C for 24&#xa0;h as well, loaded on a biomechanical testing machine (Instron-3343, Norwood, United&#x20;States), and stretched as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Feng et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>2.4&#x20;<italic>In vitro</italic> Evaluation of Membrane Biocompatibility</title>
<sec id="s3-4-1">
<title>2.4.1 Isolation and Culturing of Neonatal Rat Ventricular Cardiomyocytes and Cardiac Fibroblasts</title>
<p>Given the membranes were designed for implantation <italic>in vivo</italic> as pericardial substitutes, cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts were selected as seeding cells to evaluate the biocompatibility of membranes. Cells were isolated from neonatal Sprague Dawley (SD) rats within 3&#xa0;days after birth using a neonatal rat/mouse cardiomyocyte isolation kit. Briefly, neonatal SD rats were sterilized with 75 vol% aqueous ethanol, the chests were opened, hearts were removed, and ventricular tissues were cut and digested in a specific enzyme buffer for 12&#xa0;min at 37&#xb0;C. Then, the supernatant was transferred to a new tube, and new enzyme buffer was added to digest the remaining tissues. This step was repeated four to six times until all the tissues have been digested. Finally, the supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 1,200&#xa0;rpm for 1&#xa0;min to afford the desired cells as a pellet. After 2-h culturing, most cardiac fibroblasts were attached to the bottom of the plates, and the unattached cells were transferred to new plate and cultured for another 4&#xa0;h to remove residual cardiac fibroblasts and afford cardiomyocytes suspended in the culture medium. The two types of cells were cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin and ready for further experiments after 48&#xa0;h.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-2">
<title>2.4.2 Evaluation of Membrane Cytotoxicity</title>
<p>Nanofibrous membranes were collected on circular cover slices (diameter &#x3d; 15&#xa0;mm), exposed to ultraviolet radiation for 30&#xa0;min in a biological safety cabin, placed at the bottom of a 24-well plate with steel rings, and pre-cultured in DMEM/F-12 medium with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin overnight. In view of the rapid proliferation capacity of cardiac fibroblasts, cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts were seeded onto the membranes at densities of 5&#x20;&#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> and 2.5 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> cells per well, respectively. Cell viability was determined using the live and dead cell viability/cytotoxicity assay kit after one and 7&#xa0;days of culturing. Briefly, the cells were incubated in with 2&#xa0;&#x3bc;M calcein AM and 4&#xa0;&#x3bc;M ethidium homodimer-1 for 1&#xa0;h in the dark, washed in Dulbecco&#x2019;s phosphate buffered saline three times, and directly imaged using a laser confocal microscope system (TSC SP8, Leica, Germany).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-3">
<title>2.4.3 Efficiency of Cell Seeding on Membranes</title>
<p>Cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts were counted using an automated cell counter (iM1200, Countstar, China) to determine the total cell number and total live cell number prior to seeding. Given their absolutely different adhesion speeds, cardiac fibroblasts were incubated for 6&#xa0;h, while cardiomyocytes overnight. At predetermined times, the culture medium was collected to determine the total unattached cell number suspended in medium by the automated cell counter again. Hence, the total attached cell number &#x3d; total cell number &#x2212; total unattached cell number. The seeding efficiency (%) was calculated as 100% &#xd7; total attached cell number/total live cell number.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-4">
<title>2.4.4 Morphology of Cells on Membranes</title>
<p>The morphology of membrane-attached cells was observed using immunostaining. After one- and 5-day incubation on membranes, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30&#xa0;min, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10&#xa0;min and blocked with 10% goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1&#xa0;h at room temperature. Two primary antibodies (anti-cardiac troponin T and anti-vimentin antibodies for cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts, respectively) were used according to manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. Additionally, the antibodies were labeled with fluorescent conjugated secondary antibodies for another 2&#xa0;h, and the cell nuclei were stained with DAPI for 30&#xa0;s in the dark. The samples were washed three times with PBS on a shaker and visualized using a confocal microscope.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4-5">
<title>2.4.5 Cell Proliferation on Membranes</title>
<p>Cell proliferation on membranes was evaluated using CCK-8 on days one, three, five, and seven. Prior to measurements, the cells were cultured in another medium containing 10% CCK-8 for 2.5&#xa0;h. Absorbance was measured at 450&#xa0;nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan MK3, Thermo Electron Corporation, United&#x20;States).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>2.5&#x20;<italic>In vivo</italic> Evaluation of Membrane Anti-Adhesion Efficacy</title>
<sec id="s3-5-1">
<title>2.5.1 Animals</title>
<p>Three-month-old healthy male New&#x20;Zealand white rabbits weighing 2&#x2013;2.5&#xa0;kg were obtained from Shanghai Jiaotong University Agricultural Experimental Practice Field (Shanghai, China), housed in a temperature-controlled room (22&#xb0;C) and fed a standard laboratory diet and water. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Experiment Committee of Shanghai Jiaotong University Agricultural Experimental Practice Field. The experiment was set up consisting five groups (positive control, 0:100, 30:70, 50:50, and 70:30) at 1&#xa0;month after surgery, each group was analyzed for 5 animals. And at another time point of three months, positive control (6 animals), 0:100 (8 animals which considered its strong individual differences one month after surgery), 30:70 (6 animals), and 50:50 (6 animals) were analyzed, while two animals were died after surgery (one positive control group and one 0:100 group). In total, 51 animals were used in this&#x20;study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5-2">
<title>2.5.2 Surgical Procedures</title>
<p>The animals were divided into one positive control group and four experimental groups (GT:PCL &#x3d; 0:100, 30:70, 50:50, and 70:30). In this study, we optimized our previous experimental procedure (e.g., cut the membranes into 1.5&#xa0;cm &#xd7; 1.5&#xa0;cm pieces) and paid more attention to postoperative treatment and ethical care. Cefuroxime (30&#xa0;mg/kg) was intramuscularly administered for anti-infection for three consecutive days, while tramadol (50&#xa0;mg) was intramuscularly administered for analgesia for two consecutive days. Other specific surgical protocols were almost consistent with those used previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Feng et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5-3">
<title>2.5.3 Heart Function Evaluation</title>
<p>Echocardiography was used one and 3&#xa0;months after surgery to determine whether the nanofibrous membranes influenced heart function or induced ventricular remodeling. Briefly, the rabbits were anesthetized by intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital (30&#xa0;mg/kg), and transthoracic echocardiography was performed from the right sternum using a 12S probe (Vivid E95, GE, United&#x20;States) to detect the long axial section of the left ventricle. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fractional shortening (LVFS) required indirect calculation, while the left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWd) and interventricular septal thickness (IVSd) at end-diastole were directly determined using M-mode echocardiography. Six healthy rabbits were randomly selected for detection before surgery as a normal control.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5-4">
<title>2.5.4 Liver/Kidney Function and CRP/Immunoglobulin Level Assessments</title>
<p>The liver/kidney function and CRP/immunoglobulin levels were evaluated one and 3&#xa0;months after surgery to assess the biosafety of membranes after implantation. Seven (aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), total bilirubin (TBIL), total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), globulin, albumin/globulin (A/G)) and three (blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CREA), and cystatin C (Cys C)) commonly used indices were employed to assess liver and kidney functions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et&#x20;al., 2015a</xref>), respectively. Four immunoglobulins (IgG, IgM, IgA, and total IgE) were selected to evaluate the immune rejection level (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Jin et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). Specifically, &#x223c;3&#xa0;ml of fasting blood was collected from the internal jugular vein after completing the echocardiography. 2-ml blood was placed into a non-coagulated sterile tube and centrifuged at 4,000&#xa0;rpm for 10&#xa0;min. The upper serum was analyzed to determine the liver/kidney function and immunoglobulin levels using an automatic biochemical analyzer (C16000, Abbott Architect, United&#x20;States) and a specific protein analyzer (BN II, Siemens, Germany), respectively. The remaining 1&#xa0;ml was promptly transferred to an ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) blood collection tube, and the CRP level was determined by an automated specific protein iPOCT workstation (Ottoman-1000, Ottoman, China). All procedures were performed in strict accordance with manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. Given the short half-life of immunoglobulins (maximal at &#x223c;28&#xa0;days for IgG), their levels were examined only for a period of 1&#xa0;month after surgery. The basic normal levels of liver/kidney function, CRP and immunoglobulins were determined by six healthy rabbits before surgery as&#x20;well.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5-5">
<title>2.5.5 Overall Observation</title>
<p>Following echocardiography and blood collection, each rabbit was euthanized with sufficient sodium pentobarbital and underwent repeated sternotomy. The macroscopic adhesions were scored by an experienced surgeon, who was blinded for the purpose of this study, and the adhesion was scored using a previously reported standardized scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Malm et&#x20;al., 1992</xref>): 0&#x20;&#x3d; no adhesion between the heart and sternum/material; 1&#x20;&#x3d; mild adhesions, easy to separate by blunt dissection; 2&#x20;&#x3d; moderate adhesions, partially requiring sharp dissection; 3&#x20;&#x3d; severe adhesions, mainly requiring sharp dissection and easy bleeding. Another blinded observer assisted in image acquisition at the same&#x20;time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5-6">
<title>2.5.6 Histological Staining</title>
<p>After overall observation, the membranes were carefully removed from surrounding tissues, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for at least 24&#xa0;h, dehydrated using alcohol gradients, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned into 5-&#x3bc;m-thick slices for H-E staining to assess the inflammatory reaction and physical barrier function.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>2.6 Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>All quantitative data were presented as means&#x20;&#xb1; standard deviations. One-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey&#x2019;s post hoc test was used to determine statistically significant differences between groups. Significant difference was considered at &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05; &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01; &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c;&#x20;0.001.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>3.1 Preparation and Characterization of GT/PCL Membranes</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1A</xref>, all fibers exhibited a smooth surface without beads or bonding. The pure-PCL (0:100) membrane fibers were relatively thick (average diameter &#x3d; 785.5&#x20;&#xb1; 401.5&#xa0;nm), while thinner fibers were present in GT-containing membranes (average diameters &#x3d; 304.7&#x20;&#xb1; 98.1 and 355.7&#x20;&#xb1; 81.0&#xa0;nm for GT:PCL &#x3d; 30:70 and 50:50, respectively). However, at a ratio of 70:30, the fiber diameter increased to 494.7&#x20;&#xb1; 166.6&#xa0;nm. As for the pore size, which is an important parameter for selection of membranes as barriers to prevent cell penetration, increased with the increasing fiber diameter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1B</xref>), equaling 9.9&#x20;&#xb1; 2.3, 4.8&#x20;&#xb1; 1.2, 5.2&#x20;&#xb1; 1.4, and 7.8&#x20;&#xb1; 1.6&#xa0;&#xb5;m for different ratios of 0:100, 30:70, 50:50, and 70:30, respectively. Membrane composition was probed by FT-IR (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1C</xref>). The characteristic peaks of PCL at 2,943&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (asymmetric CH<sub>2</sub> stretch), 2,865&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (symmetric CH<sub>2</sub> stretch), and 1,724&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (C&#x3d;O stretch) were observed for all membranes, while the characteristic peaks of GT at 1,652&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (amide I) and 1,540&#xa0;cm<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (amide II) were only observed for GT/PCL membranes. The amide I band was attributed to the random coil and &#x3b1;-helix conformations of GT. As expected, the areal fractions of PCL- and GT-specific peaks decreased and increased with increasing GT content, respectively.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Representative <bold>(A)</bold> SEM micrographs [scale bars equal 50&#xa0;&#x3bc;m (low magnification) and 10&#xa0;&#x3bc;m (high magnification)], <bold>(B)</bold> fiber diameters and pore sizes, and <bold>(C)</bold> FT-IR spectra of nanofibrous membranes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-792893-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The 0:100 membrane was highly hydrophobic, and the water droplets deposited thereon formed a large obtuse contact angle (137.0&#x20;&#xb1; 7.0&#xb0;) and remained stable. The incorporation of GT greatly increased hydrophilicity, and all GT/PCL membranes presented hydrophilic surfaces with acute contact angles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2</xref>). In the case of the 30:70 membrane, water was rapidly absorbed to afford a contact angle of zero within 30&#xa0;s. However, the rate of water absorption decreased at higher GT contents, in line with the fact that water absorption by pure-GT membranes is also insufficient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Feng et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Water contact angles of different nanofibrous membranes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-792893-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>As the membranes were implanted <italic>in vivo</italic>, they were immersed into saline held at 37&#xb0;C to characterize shrinkage under simulated physiological conditions. Compared with their original size (i.e.,&#x20;the size of the underlying aluminum foil), the 0:100 membrane did not shrink, while 30:70, 50:50, and 70:30 membranes slightly contracted, which indicated that all membranes had good thermal stability (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3A</xref>). However, these membranes showed different mechanical properties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3B</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>). The introduction of GT greatly improved the mechanical properties of membranes with the increased maximum tensile strength (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3C</xref>) and strain at break (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3E</xref>), while significant mechanical property deterioration was observed at a GT content of 70%, as exemplified by the decreased maximum tensile strength (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3C</xref>) and Young&#x2019;s modulus (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3D</xref>). In particular, the maximum tensile strength decreased in the order of 4.4&#x20;&#xb1; 0.4&#xa0;MPa (30:70) &#x3e; 4.1&#x20;&#xb1; 0.6&#xa0;MPa (50:50) &#x3e; 1.4&#x20;&#xb1; 0.1&#xa0;MPa (0:100) &#x3e; 0.7&#x20;&#xb1; 0.2&#xa0;MPa (70:30).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Gross views, <bold>(B)</bold> stress-strain curves, <bold>(C)</bold> tensile strengths, <bold>(D)</bold> Young&#x2019;s modulus, and <bold>(E)</bold> strains at break of membranes after 24-h immersion into physiological saline at 37&#xb0;C (&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05; &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01; &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-792893-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Mechanical parameters calculated from the strain-stress curves of wet membranes.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Membrane</th>
<th align="center">Young&#x2019;s modulus (MPa)</th>
<th align="center">Tensile strength (MPa)</th>
<th align="center">Strain at break (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">0:100</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.5&#x20;&#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">1.4&#x20;&#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">110.0&#x20;&#xb1; 8.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">30:70</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">2.1&#x20;&#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">4.4&#x20;&#xb1; 0.3</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">194.6&#x20;&#xb1; 21.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">50:50</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">2.6&#x20;&#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">4.1&#x20;&#xb1; 0.7</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">159.4&#x20;&#xb1; 16.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">70:30</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.4&#x20;&#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">0.7&#x20;&#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">140.3&#x20;&#xb1; 39.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>3.2 Biocompatibility of GT/PCL Membranes <italic>in&#x20;vitro</italic>
</title>
<p>The viability of cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts on membranes was assessed using the live/dead cell assay. In the obtained images, green fluorescence represents live cells, while red fluorescence represents the dead. After 1&#xa0;day of culturing, both cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts adhered well to all membranes, as exemplified by the numerous green dots (live cells) and few red dots (dead cells) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4A</xref>). The cells continued to grow with time, reaching &#x223c;90% (cardiomyocytes) and 100% (fibroblasts) confluency on all membranes with bright green fluorescence on day seven. In addition, cell seeding efficiencies reached &#x223c;70% (cardiomyocytes) and 80% (fibroblasts) on all membranes without significant differences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4B</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Representative live and dead staining images of cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts cultured on different membranes for one and 7&#xa0;days. Scale bars &#x3d; 200&#xa0;&#x3bc;m. <bold>(B)</bold> Seeding efficiencies of cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts on different membranes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-792893-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The morphology and proliferation of cells cultured on membranes were evaluated using immunofluorescence staining (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5A</xref>). Troponin T (cardiomyocytes) and vimentin (fibroblasts) staining showed that both cells well adhered and spread on all membranes on day one, although a larger fibroblast spreading area was observed for the 70:30 group. With increasing cultivation time, cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts rapidly proliferated on all membranes at day five. In line with the results of immunofluorescence staining, those of the CCK-8 assay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5B</xref>) revealed that cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts exhibited steady and continuous proliferation without significant difference between groups, except for the downward trend in the 0:100 group at day seven for cardiomyocytes.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Representative immunofluorescence staining images of cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts cultured on different membranes for one and 5&#xa0;days. Blue: nucleus. Red: cTNT. Green: vimentin. Scale bars &#x3d; 100&#xa0;&#x3bc;m. <bold>(B)</bold> Proliferation of cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts cultured on different nanofibrous membranes for one, three, five, and 7&#xa0;days. (&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-792893-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Collectively, these results indicated that all GT/PCL membranes had good biocompatibility with cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts and were suitable for applications in cardiac surgery.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-3">
<title>3.3&#x20;Anti-adhesion Efficacies of GT/PCL Membranes One Month After Surgery</title>
<p>One month after surgery, the heart/liver/kidney functions and CRP/immunoglobulin lever assessments were used to detect whether the membranes would cause adverse reactions <italic>in vivo</italic> implantation. Echocardiography (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6A,B</xref>) showed that compared with the normal group (healthy rabbits that did not undergo surgery), the heart function indicators LVEF and LVFS in the positive control and 70:30 groups were significantly reduced, whereas no significant differences were observed among the 0:100, 30:70, and 50:50 groups. Conversely, there were no significant differences in liver (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6C</xref>) or kidney (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6D</xref>) function indicators among all groups, which suggested that the membranes were not toxic to the liver and kidneys. Additionally, the results of CRP and immunoglobulin level evaluation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>) were not significantly different among all groups either, indicating that the membranes did not induce strong inflammation reaction and immune rejection response after implantation <italic>in vivo</italic>. Collectively, these results demonstrated that all the membranes exhibited sufficient biosafety for implantation <italic>in vivo</italic>, except for the 70:30 group, in which case a reduction in heart function (i.e.,&#x20;in LVEF and LVFS) was observed.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>One month after surgery <bold>(A)</bold> representative echocardiography images, <bold>(B)</bold> heart function and <bold>(C,D)</bold> liver/kidney function for normal and experimental groups. (&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-792893-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>CRP and immunoglobulin levels in different groups 1&#xa0;month after surgery.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Indicator</th>
<th align="center">Normal</th>
<th align="center">Positive</th>
<th align="center">0:100</th>
<th align="center">30:70</th>
<th align="center">50:50</th>
<th align="center">70:30</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">CRP (mg/L)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">IgG (g/L)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">IgA (g/L)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">IgM (g/L)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.18</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total IgE (IU/ml)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;4.23</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;4.23</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;4.23</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;4.23</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;4.23</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;4.23</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>After echocardiography and blood examination, animals were anesthetized and sacrificed. The thoracic cavity was reopened, and adhesions between the heart and sternum were separated by dissection. In the positive control group, severe adhesions were formed at the injury site of the previous operation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7A,E</xref>), and more attention had to be paid during dissection to keep the heart intact. Strong individual differences were observed in the 0:100 group, i.e.,&#x20;some rabbits had no or slight adhesions that could be easily separated by blunt dissection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7B,F</xref>); whereas others had thick and heavy adhesions requiring continuous sharp dissection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7C,G</xref>). However, mild filamentous adhesions were observed in 30:70 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7D,H</xref>) and 50:50 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7I,K</xref>) groups, the membranes could be easily separated from the heart and maintained their original shape with a white appearance. In the 70:30 group, intense and solid adhesions were observed, and the original membrane shape was hardly recognizable due to the rapid degradation of GT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7J</xref>). Broken holes and bleeding were easily induced upon membrane detachment from the sternum due to the poor mechanical properties of this membrane (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7L</xref>). Furthermore, according to the results of adhesion grade scoring (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7M</xref>), the adhesions were severe in the positive control (score &#x3d; 2.6&#x20;&#xb1; 0.9) and 70:30 (2.6&#x20;&#xb1; 0.5) groups. Much lower scores were observed for 30:70 (1.2&#x20;&#xb1; 0.4) and 50:50 (1.2&#x20;&#xb1; 0.8) groups, while a very large score fluctuation was observed for the 0:100 group (1.4&#x20;&#xb1;&#x20;1.5).</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>One month after surgery representative overall images for <bold>(A,E)</bold> positive control, <bold>(B,C,F,G)</bold> 0:100, <bold>(D,H)</bold> 30:70, <bold>(I,K)</bold> 50:50, and <bold>(J,L)</bold> 70:30 groups, blue arrows indicate adhesion sites, and yellow arrows show sutures positions. <bold>(M)</bold> pericardial adhesion grades, &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05, and representative H-E staining images for <bold>(N,R)</bold> 0:100, <bold>(O,S)</bold> 30:70, <bold>(P,T)</bold> 50:50, and <bold>(Q,U)</bold> 70:30 groups, yellow circles indicate &#x201c;islands,&#x201d; red dot lines indicate &#x201c;barriers.&#x201d; Green, blue, black, and purple arrows show multinucleated giant cells, fibroblasts, muscular tissues, and blood vessels, respectively. Scale bars &#x3d; 80&#xa0;&#x3bc;m.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-792893-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>After overall observation, the membranes were carefully removed from surrounding tissues. Histological analysis demonstrated that though all the membranes had the same thickness before surgery, the thickness of 0:100 membrane significantly exceeded than others after implantation. Numerous inflammatory cells have entirely infiltrated into the 0:100 membrane regardless of whether adhesions were slight or strong (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7N</xref>). High-magnification imaging showed that the membrane was divided into masses of small islands, many macrophages gathered and ranged along islands to form multinucleated giant cells thereby inducing membrane disintegration and phagocytosis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#x20;7R</xref>). In the 30:70 and 50:50 groups, obvious pink barriers were observed with several (30:70, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7O,S</xref>) or no (50:50, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7P,T</xref>) infiltrating cells and a small number of inflammatory cells and sporadic blood capillaries distributed on both sides of barriers. While in the 70:30 group, many monocytes, multinucleated giant cells, fibroblasts, blood vessels and muscular tissues have invaded into the membranes, and no barriers were formed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures&#x20;7Q,U</xref>).</p>
<p>Considering the 70:30 membrane was not only difficult to suture during surgery but also could not maintain its structural integrity to prevent cardiac postoperative adhesion after being implanted <italic>in vivo</italic>, and therefore, this membrane was not investigated further.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-4">
<title>3.4&#x20;Anti-adhesion Efficacies of GT/PCL Membranes Three Months After Surgery</title>
<p>Echocardiography (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figures 8A,B</xref>) showed that compared with the normal group, the heart function (i.e.,&#x20;LVEF and LVFS values) was significantly reduced in the positive control group, while no significant differences were observed for other three groups (0:100, 30:70, and 50:50). Further blood examination showed that the liver/kidney function indicators (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figures 8C,D</xref>) of normal group were not significantly different from those of other groups, and CRP levels were still less than 1&#xa0;mg/L for all groups. These results were consistent with those obtained 1-month after surgery, which illustrated the high biosafety of PCL and GT/PCL (30:70 and 50:50) membranes for long-term <italic>in vivo</italic> implantation.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Three months after surgery <bold>(A)</bold> representative echocardiography images, <bold>(B)</bold> heart function and <bold>(C,D)</bold> liver/kidney function for normal and experimental groups. (&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05; &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-792893-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Overall, dense and solid adhesions were observed between the pericardial defect area and sternum in the positive control group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9A,D</xref>). These adhesions were more serious than those formed 1-month after surgery and could only be separated by sharp dissection. And the adhesion conditions still showed large variations between individual animals in the 0:100 group, i.e.,&#x20;some rabbits had no or slight adhesions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9B,E</xref>), while the others had severe adhesions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9C,F</xref>). However, filamentous and sparse adhesions were observed between the membranes and epicardium in 30:70 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9G,I</xref>) and 50:50 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9H,J</xref>) groups, which could be easily separated by digital dissection. Specifically, the membrane became blurred and developed a yellow-like appearance similar to that of the native pericardium tissues. The heart was smooth and moist, and the coronary arteries were clearly visible. The related adhesion grade scores were shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure&#x20;9K</xref>. The adhesion was strongest in the positive control group (score &#x3d; 2.2&#x20;&#xb1; 1.1), with lower scores observed for 30:70 (1.0&#x20;&#xb1; 0.6) and 50:50 (0.8&#x20;&#xb1; 0.8) groups. As in the case of 1&#xa0;month after surgery, a large standard deviation was observed for the 0:100 group (1.3&#x20;&#xb1;&#x20;1.4).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Three months after surgery representative overall images for <bold>(A,D)</bold> positive control, <bold>(B,C,E,F)</bold> 0:100, <bold>(G,I)</bold> 30:70, and <bold>(H,J)</bold> 50:50 groups, blue arrows indicate adhesion sites, and yellow arrows show sutures positions. <bold>(K)</bold> Pericardial adhesion grades, &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05, and representative H-E staining images for <bold>(L,O)</bold> 0:100, <bold>(M,P)</bold> 30:70, and <bold>(N,Q)</bold> 50:50 groups, yellow circles indicate &#x201c;islands,&#x201d; red dot lines indicate &#x201c;barriers,&#x201d; green arrows indicate multinucleated giant cells. Scale bars &#x3d; 80&#xa0;&#x3bc;m.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-792893-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Histological staining showed that the 0:100 membrane gradually degraded, and most islands have disappeared (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure&#x20;9L</xref>). Multinucleated giant cells were much bigger and more visible than 1&#xa0;month after surgery, forming many dark purple (nucleus) bumps (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure&#x20;9O</xref>). In the 30:70 group, some inflammatory cells together with small arteries and blood capillaries infiltrated the membrane, and the barrier became blurred (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9M,P</xref>). However, an obvious pink barrier with no cell infiltration was observed in the 50:50 group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9N,Q</xref>), indicating that this membrane could act as a perfect barrier to prevent cell infiltration, which was in line with the results obtained 1&#xa0;month after surgery.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<p>Adhesion is one of the most frequent postoperative complications with many serious consequences. For example, peritoneal adhesions are commonly observed after abdominal and pelvic surgery, leading to chronic abdominal pain, intestinal obstruction, and female infertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hol et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Tang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). And pelvic adhesions resulting from gynecologic surgery may also cause chronic pelvic pain, small bowel obstruction, and female infertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Al-Jabri and Tulandi, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Dawood and Elgergawy, 2018</xref>). Besides, tendon adhesions not only cause dysfunction and pain, but also usually require surgical intervention to loosen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Liu et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Cai et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). In addition, many patients undergoing cardiac surgery require reoperation even multiple operations. Owing to the adhesions generated by the first operation, original anatomical layers and gaps have been disappeared, leaving the reoperation a daunting task. In our pilot study, electrospun membranes with a GT:PCL mass ratio of 50:50 have showed high potential in reducing sternal and epicardial adhesions after cardiac surgery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Feng et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). However, the GT:PCL ratio can affect the physical structure, mechanical properties, degradation rate, and biocompatibility of membranes, which may eventually lead to changes in anti-adhesion efficacy. Thus, GT/PCL membranes with various compositions were investigated herein.</p>
<p>Good mechanical properties are a primary prerequisite for given materials used as anti-adhesion barriers after cardiac surgery, as the membranes must withstand the stretching during surgical suturing and the forces generated during movements <italic>in vivo</italic>. PCL is a synthetic bioresorbable polymer with excellent mechanical properties, while GT is a natural biodegradable polymer in poor mechanical properties. Surprisingly, in line with our previous findings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Feng et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>), the hybridization of PCL with GT (GT:PCL &#x3d; 30:70 and 50:50, w/w) did not deteriorate but rather enhance the mechanical properties than pure PCL membranes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3C,E</xref>). This behavior was ascribed to the good miscibility of GT and PCL, their good entanglement made the molecular chains difficult to slide under loading. However, at an overly high GT content of 70&#xa0;wt%, the mechanical properties worsened (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3C,D</xref>), which complicated the suture during surgery and then resulted in increasing operation time and difficulties. Further animal dissection demonstrated that this membrane was easily broken, hardly maintained its structural integrity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7J,L</xref>), and could not act as an effective physical barrier to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7Q,U</xref>). It is known that the structural integrity is a critical consideration as a physical barrier. Therefore, the 70:30 membrane was concluded to be unsuitable for preventing postoperative cardiac adhesion because of its poor mechanical properties.</p>
<p>Biocompatibility is another important factor for assessing the suitability of membranes to be implanted <italic>in vivo</italic>. <italic>L</italic>ive/dead staining showed that all the tested membranes had no cytotoxicity to cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts <italic>in&#x20;vitro</italic>, and there were no obvious differences on cell seeding efficiencies as well (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4</xref>). Furthermore, the cells adhered well and experienced rapid proliferation on all membranes, as revealed by immunofluorescence staining and the CCK-8 assay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5</xref>). <italic>In vivo</italic> studies have shown that heart/liver/kidney functions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figures 6</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>) and CRP/immunoglobulin levels (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>) in 0:100, 30:70, and 50:50 groups were not different from those of normal healthy rabbits. These results indicated that PCL and GT/PCL (30:70 and 50:50) membranes are biosafety enough and did not affect the heart/liver/kidney functions or induce intense inflammation and immune rejection responses after implantation <italic>in vivo</italic>. Given their good mechanical properties and excellent biocompatibility, the 0:100, 30:70, and 50:50 membranes showed promising potential as barriers in preventing postoperative cardiac adhesion.</p>
<p>Unexpectedly, the overall observation showed inconsistent results after the animals were sacrificed and anatomized (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7A</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">L</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9A</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">J</xref>). Large differences between individual animals were observed in the 0:100 group, i.e.,&#x20;some animals had no or slight adhesions, while the others were severe. However, mild adhesions were observed in both 30:70 and 50:50 groups. These results suggested that the 0:100 membrane was not suitable for the prevention of adhesions after cardiac surgery either.</p>
<p>Adhesion formation involves a series of complex pathophysiological reactions, such as the tissue damage, inflammatory responses, coagulation, fibrin deposition, fibroblast proliferation, collagen formation, and angiogenesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cannata et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kheilnezhad and Hadjizadeh, 2021</xref>), but the specific mechanism remains to be elucidated. Previous studies supposed that biomaterials could act as anti-adhesion barriers by blocking fibroblasts penetration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Jiang et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen et&#x20;al., 2015b</xref>), as the excessive proliferation of fibroblasts resulted in producing abundant collagen fibers to form dense and thick fibrous adhesions. However, in this study, histological staining showed that numerous inflammatory cells instead of fibroblasts infiltrated into the 0:100 membranes. It is known that the inflammatory response plays an important role in adhesion formation, e.g., inflammatory cell aggregation and inflammatory mediator release can promote fibroblast proliferation and thus aggravate adhesion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Pismensky et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hu et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zhang et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, the inflammatory cells infiltration, not fibroblasts penetration, might be the real reason that PCL membranes failed to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion.</p>
<p>Accumulation of acidic degradation products can elicit a severe inflammatory response. Polymers such as polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid (PLA), and their copolymers [poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)] contain abundant carboxyl groups and can therefore release many acidic degradation products that trigger severe aseptic inflammatory responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lin et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Shen et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Tu et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). Unlike PLA, PCL has no carboxyl groups and therefore cannot induce an inflammatory response via the above mechanism. Further analysis showed that the pore size of materials might be the key factor to induce inflammatory responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Madden et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chiu et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Garg et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Wang et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>). Inflammatory cells are the smallest cells <italic>in vivo</italic>, the diameter was generally in the range of 6&#x2013;20&#xa0;&#x3bc;m, being largest for macrophages (14&#x2013;20&#xa0;&#xb5;m) and smallest for lymphocytes (6&#x2013;10&#xa0;&#xb5;m). And the 0:100 membrane had the largest pore size (9.9&#x20;&#xb1; 2.3&#xa0;&#xb5;m, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1B</xref>) and was theoretically permeable to most inflammatory cells, whereas the pore sizes of 30:70 and 50:50 membranes were much smaller (4.8&#x20;&#xb1; 1.2 and 5.2&#x20;&#xb1; 1.4&#xa0;&#xb5;m, respectively, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1B</xref>) than that of lymphocytes. In addition, the pore size of GT/PCL membranes will decrease further after implanting <italic>in vivo</italic> due to the hydrophilicity of GT (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2</xref>), as the nanofibers can absorb large amounts of water and swell. Therefore, the small pore size enabled the 30:70 and 50:50 membranes not only block the invasion of fibroblasts (diameter &#x3d; 20&#x2013;30&#xa0;&#xb5;m), but also prevent the infiltration of inflammatory cells. Furthermore, compared to the 30:70 membrane, the 50:50 membrane might experience a larger pore size reduction due to its higher content of GT, which was strongly supported by the fact that some cells invaded into the 30:70 membrane, while no cells were observed in the 50:50 group 3&#xa0;months after surgery (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figures 9L&#x2013;Q</xref>).</p>
<p>Collectively, in consideration of good mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility and effective anti-cell penetration ability, the GT/PCL 50:50 membrane is concluded the best one to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion among all groups. As a physical barrier, it might have great potential in other biomedical applications, such as the prevention of non-cardiac postoperative adhesions, wound healing, and guided tissue or bone regeneration. Nevertheless, it still has some limitations. Though mild adhesions were observed between the GT/PCL 50:50 membrane and epicardium, there were still moderate or severe adhesions between the membrane and sternum, increasing the difficulties of reoperation as well. Loading medicine into the GT/PCL 50:50 membrane to further enhance its anti-adhesion efficacy will be investigated in our future study. In addition, the degradation rate of PCL is pretty slow which will increase the risk of infection and hinder tissue regeneration. Replacing or blending the PCL with easier absorbable materials such as polydioxanone (PDO) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Oh et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kwon et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>) or Poly (glycerol sebacate) (PGS) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Vogt et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fu et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>) might be more preferable.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>5 Conclusion</title>
<p>Pure PCL (0:100) and GT/PCL (30:70, 50:50, 70:30) nanofibrous membranes were successfully fabricated via electrospinning. Through the assessments of physicochemical properties and biocompatibility, as well as evaluations of rabbit heart/liver/kidney functions, CRP/immunoglobulin levels and adhesion degree, we discovered that the 70:30 membrane failed to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion because of its poor mechanical properties, and the pure PCL membrane could not effectively prevent either, because numerous inflammatory cells have infiltrated into the membrane which induced a serious inflammatory response. Only the GT:PCL 50:50 membrane exhibited excellent mechanical properties, good biocompatibility and effective anti-cell penetration ability, which might be a perfect barrier to prevent postoperative cardiac adhesion and show great potential in other biomedical applications such as the prevention of non-cardiac postoperative adhesions, wound healing, and guided tissue or bone regeneration. In addition, as a physical barrier, the ability to inhibit inflammatory cells infiltration, not fibroblasts penetration, might be the key consideration in design and fabrication of nanofibrous membrane to prevent postoperative adhesion.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by The Animal Care and Experiment Committee of Shanghai Jiaotong University Agricultural Experimental Practice Field.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>XW: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing-Original Draft. LX: Methodology, Investigation, Validation. YP: Methodology, Formal analysis. ZD: Investigation, Validation. YH: Investigation, Validation. XP: Data Curation. XZ: Methodology. HZ: Conceptualization, Resources, Project administration, Supervision. BF: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing&#x2014;Review and editing, Supervision.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the National Key R&#x26;D Program of China (2019YFA0110401 and 2019YFA0110402), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81601622 and 31971048), the Fund of Transformation Medicine Cross Research of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2019ZDA04), the Leading Medical Talent in Shanghai (2019LJ22), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (20ZR1434400).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s11">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s12">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Al-Jabri</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tulandi</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Management and Prevention of Pelvic Adhesions</article-title>. <source>Semin. Reprod. Med.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>130</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-0031-1272475</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alimohammadi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aghli</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fakhraei</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moradi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Passandideh-Fard</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ebrahimzadeh</surname>
<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes for Preventing Tendon Adhesion</article-title>. <source>ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>4356</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4376</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00201</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>W. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>MMP-2 Responsive Unidirectional Hydrogel-Electrospun Patch Loading TGF-Beta 1 siRNA Polyplexes for Peritendinous Anti-adhesion</article-title>. <source>Adv. Funct. Mater.</source>, <fpage>31</fpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cannata</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petrella</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Russo</surname>
<given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruschi</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fratto</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gambacorta</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Postsurgical Intrapericardial Adhesions: Mechanisms of Formation and Prevention</article-title>. <source>Ann. Thorac. Surg.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>1818</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1826</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.020</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>C.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shalumon</surname>
<given-names>K. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Prevention of Peritendinous Adhesions with Electrospun Polyethylene Glycol/polycaprolactone Nanofibrous Membranes</article-title>. <source>Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces</source> <volume>133</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>230</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.06.012</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chou</surname>
<given-names>P. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>F. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Electrospun Water-Borne Polyurethane Nanofibrous Membrane as a Barrier for Preventing Postoperative Peritendinous Adhesion</article-title>. <source>Int. J.&#x20;Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>20</volume>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms20071625</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A Novel Bioabsorbable Pericardial Membrane Substitute to Reduce Postoperative Pericardial Adhesions in a Rabbit Model</article-title>. <source>Interact Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>565</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>572</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icvts/ivv213</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chiu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>M.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engel</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kao</surname>
<given-names>S.-W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larson</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The Role of Pore Size on Vascularization and Tissue Remodeling in PEG Hydrogels</article-title>. <source>Biomaterials</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>6045</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6051</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.066</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dawood</surname>
<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elgergawy</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Incidence and Sites of Pelvic Adhesions in Women with post-caesarean Infertility</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Obstet. Gynaecol.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>1158</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1163</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01443615.2018.1460583</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Oliveira</surname>
<given-names>P. P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bavaresco</surname>
<given-names>V. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silveira-Filho</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schenka</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vilarinho</surname>
<given-names>K. A. d. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbosa de Oliveira Severino</surname>
<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Use of a Novel Polyvinyl Alcohol Membrane as a Pericardial Substitute Reduces Adhesion Formation and Inflammatory Response after Cardiac Reoperation</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.</source> <volume>147</volume>, <fpage>1405</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1410</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.021</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Engineering Cartilage Tissue Based on Cartilage-Derived Extracellular Matrix cECM/PCL Hybrid Nanofibrous Scaffold</article-title>. <source>Mater. Des.</source>, <fpage>193</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108773</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Acetic-acid-mediated Miscibility toward Electrospinning Homogeneous Composite Nanofibers of GT/PCL</article-title>. <source>Biomacromolecules</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>3917</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3925</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bm3009389</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Bioresorbable Electrospun Gelatin/polycaprolactone Nanofibrous Membrane as a Barrier to Prevent Cardiac Postoperative Adhesion</article-title>. <source>Acta Biomater.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>220</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.022</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stowell</surname>
<given-names>C. E. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Slow Degrading Poly(glycerol Sebacate) Derivatives Improve Vascular Graft Remodeling in a Rat Carotid Artery Interposition Model</article-title>. <source>Biomaterials</source> <volume>257</volume>, <fpage>120251</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120251</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garg</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pullen</surname>
<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oskeritzian</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bowlin</surname>
<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Macrophage Functional Polarization (M1/M2) in Response to Varying Fiber and Pore Dimensions of Electrospun Scaffolds</article-title>. <source>Biomaterials</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>4439</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4451</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.065</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghasemi-Mobarakeh</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prabhakaran</surname>
<given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morshed</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nasr-Esfahani</surname>
<given-names>M.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramakrishna</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Electrospun Poly(&#x25b;-Caprolactone)/gelatin Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Nerve Tissue Engineering</article-title>. <source>Biomaterials</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>4532</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4539</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.007</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hol</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strik</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaturvedi</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lomme</surname>
<given-names>R. M. L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Goor</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stommel</surname>
<given-names>M. W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The Efficacy of an Ultrapure Alginate Gel in Reducing Adhesion Formation in a Rat Model of Blood Contamination</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Surg. Res.</source> <volume>241</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>276</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.035</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A Review of Physiological and Cellular Mechanisms Underlying Fibrotic Postoperative Adhesion</article-title>. <source>Int. J.&#x20;Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>298</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>306</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7150/ijbs.54403</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jacobs</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iyer</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weston</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amato</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elliott</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Leval</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Expanded PTFE Membrane to Prevent Cardiac Injury during Resternotomy for Congenital Heart Disease</article-title>. <source>Ann. Thorac. Surg.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>1778</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1782</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0003-4975(96)00610-8</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Down-regulating ERK1/2 and SMAD2/3 Phosphorylation by Physical Barrier of Celecoxib-Loaded Electrospun Fibrous Membranes Prevents Tendon Adhesions</article-title>. <source>Biomaterials</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>9920</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9929</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.028</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>A. l.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of a Simple Off-The-Shelf Bi-layered Vascular Scaffold Based on poly(L-Lactide-Co-&#x3b5;-Caprolactone)/silk Fibroin <italic>In Vitro</italic> and <italic>In Vivo</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Ijn</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>4261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4276</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/ijn.s205569</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaushal</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patel</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goh</surname>
<given-names>S.-K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sood</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname>
<given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Backer</surname>
<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>A Novel Combination of Bioresorbable Polymeric Film and Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Provides a Protective Barrier and Reduces Adhesions</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.</source> <volume>141</volume>, <fpage>789</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>795</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.043</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Keshvardoostchokami</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Majidi</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huo</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramachandran</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Electrospun Nanofibers of Natural and Synthetic Polymers as Artificial Extracellular Matrix for Tissue Engineering</article-title>. <source>Nanomaterials</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/nano11010021</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kheilnezhad</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hadjizadeh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A Review: Progress in Preventing Tissue Adhesions from a Biomaterial Perspective</article-title>. <source>Biomater. Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>2850</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2873</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/d0bm02023k</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kwon</surname>
<given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yeo</surname>
<given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Biostimulatory Effects of Polydioxanone, Poly-D, L Lactic Acid, and Polycaprolactone Fillers in Mouse Model</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Cosmet. Dermatol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>1002</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1008</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jocd.12950</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lassaletta</surname>
<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sellke</surname>
<given-names>F. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effects of Alcohol on Pericardial Adhesion Formation in Hypercholesterolemic Swine</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>953</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>959</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.016</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leong</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joseph</surname>
<given-names>P. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McKee</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anand</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teo</surname>
<given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwalm</surname>
<given-names>J.-D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Reducing the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease, Part 2</article-title>. <source>Circ. Res.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>695</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>710</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/circresaha.117.311849</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Hyaluronic Acid Coating Enhances Biocompatibility of Nonwoven PGA Scaffold and Cartilage Formation</article-title>. <source>Tissue Eng. C: Methods</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>86</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/ten.tec.2016.0373</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Tendon Healing and Anti-adhesion Properties of Electrospun Fibrous Membranes Containing bFGF Loaded Nanoparticles</article-title>. <source>Biomaterials</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>4690</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4701</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.026</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lopes</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dallan</surname>
<given-names>L. A. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campana-Filho</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lisboa</surname>
<given-names>L. A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gutierrez</surname>
<given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreira</surname>
<given-names>L. F. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Keratinocyte Growth Factor: a New Mesothelial Targeted Therapy to Reduce Postoperative Pericardial Adhesions&#x2606;</article-title>. <source>Eur. J.&#x20;Cardio-Thoracic Surg.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>318</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.046</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Madden</surname>
<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mortisen</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sussman</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dupras</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fugate</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cuy</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Proangiogenic Scaffolds as Functional Templates for Cardiac Tissue Engineering</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>15211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15216</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1006442107</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malm</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bowald</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bylock</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Busch</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Prevention of Postoperative Pericardial Adhesions by Closure of the Pericardium with Absorbable Polymer Patches</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>600</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>607</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0022-5223(19)34724-5</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guidoin</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brochu</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Potential of a Facile Sandwiched Electrospun Scaffold Loaded with Ibuprofen as an Anti-adhesion Barrier</article-title>. <source>Mater. Sci. Eng. C</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>111451</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.msec.2020.111451</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Minale</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikol</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hollweg</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mittermayer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Messmer</surname>
<given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Clinical Experience with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Gore-Tex Surgical Membrane for Pericardial Closure: a Study of 110 Cases</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Card. Surg.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1540-8191.1988.tb00239.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nagarajan</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Belaid</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pochat-Bohatier</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teyssier</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iatsunskyi</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coy</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Design of Boron Nitride/Gelatin Electrospun Nanofibers for Bone Tissue Engineering</article-title>. <source>ACS Appl. Mater. Inter.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>33695</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33706</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acsami.7b13199</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naito</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shin&#x27;oka</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hibino</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsumura</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kurosawa</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A Novel Method to Reduce Pericardial Adhesion: a Combination Technique with Hyaluronic Acid Biocompatible Membrane</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.</source> <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>850</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>856</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.062</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oh</surname>
<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>H. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koh</surname>
<given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>J.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Degradation Behavior of 3D Porous Polydioxanone-B-Polycaprolactone Scaffolds Fabricated Using the Melt-Molding Particulate-Leaching Method</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Biomater. Sci. Polym. Edition</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>237</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1163/092050609x12597621891620</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ozeren</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mavioglu</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simsek</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soyal</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guler</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Consequences of PTFE Membrane Used for Prevention of Re-entry Injuries in Rheumatic Valve Disease</article-title>. <source>Cardiovasc. Surg.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>493</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0967-2109(02)00061-3</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pismensky</surname>
<given-names>S. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kalzhanov</surname>
<given-names>Z. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eliseeva</surname>
<given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kosmas</surname>
<given-names>I. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mynbaev</surname>
<given-names>O. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Severe Inflammatory Reaction Induced by Peritoneal Trauma Is the Key Driving Mechanism of Postoperative Adhesion Formation</article-title>. <source>BMC Surg.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>30</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2482-11-30</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Z. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Combined Application of Acellular Bovine Pericardium and Hyaluronic Acid in Prevention of Postoperative Pericardial Adhesion</article-title>. <source>Artif. Organs</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>224</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>230</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aor.12140</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Electrospun Acid-Neutralizing Fibers for the Amelioration of Inflammatory Response</article-title>. <source>Acta Biomater.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.014</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernards</surname>
<given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Peritoneal Adhesions: Occurrence, Prevention and Experimental Models</article-title>. <source>Acta Biomater.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>84</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.036</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tsukihara</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takamoto</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kitahori</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsuda</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murakami</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Novick</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Prevention of Postoperative Pericardial Adhesions with a Novel Regenerative Collagen Sheet</article-title>. <source>Ann. Thorac. Surg.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>650</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>657</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.07.022</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>G. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Tendon ECM Modified Bioactive Electrospun Fibers Promote MSC Tenogenic Differentiation and Tendon Regeneration</article-title>. <source>Appl. Mater. Today</source>, <fpage>18</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100495</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vogt</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rivera</surname>
<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liverani</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piegat</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>El Fray</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boccaccini</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Poly(&#x3b5;-caprolactone)/poly(glycerol Sebacate) Electrospun Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering Using Benign Solvents</article-title>. <source>Mater. Sci. Eng. C</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>109712</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.091</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The Effect of Thick Fibers and Large Pores of Electrospun Poly(&#x3b5;-Caprolactone) Vascular Grafts on Macrophage Polarization and Arterial Regeneration</article-title>. <source>Biomaterials</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>5700</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5710</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.078</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A Multimodal Antimicrobial Platform Based on MXene for Treatment of Wound Infection</article-title>. <source>Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces</source> <volume>207</volume>, <fpage>111979</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111979</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications</article-title>. <source>Chem. Rev.</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>5298</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5415</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yildirimer</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Advanced Technology-Driven Therapeutic Interventions for Prevention of Tendon Adhesion: Design, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factor Considerations</article-title>. <source>Acta Biomater.</source> <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.actbio.2021.01.027</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The Influence of Gelatin/PCL Ratio and 3-D Construct Shape of Electrospun Membranes on Cartilage Regeneration</article-title>. <source>Biomaterials</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>152</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>164</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.082</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>