<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-4185</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2021.630568</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Bioengineering and Biotechnology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Flow Dynamics and Mixing in Extracorporeal Support: A Study of the Return Cannula</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lem&#x000E9;tayer</surname> <given-names>Julien</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1173876/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Broman</surname> <given-names>L. Mikael</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Prahl Wittberg</surname> <given-names>Lisa</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1145287/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>FLOW &#x00026; BioMEx, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)</institution>, <addr-line>Stockholm</addr-line>, <country>Sweden</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>ECMO Centre Karolinska, Astrid Lindgren Children&#x00027;s Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Stockholm</addr-line>, <country>Sweden</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet</institution>, <addr-line>Stockholm</addr-line>, <country>Sweden</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Philippe Sucosky, Kennesaw State University, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Hoda Hatoum, Michigan Technological University, United States; Harvey Ho, University of Auckland, New Zealand</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Lisa Prahl Wittberg <email>prahl&#x00040;kth.se</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Biomechanics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>630568</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>17</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2020</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>04</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2021 Lem&#x000E9;tayer, Broman and Prahl Wittberg.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lem&#x000E9;tayer, Broman and Prahl Wittberg</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license> </permissions>
<abstract><p>Cannulation strategies in medical treatment such as in extracorporeal life support along with the associated cannula position, orientation and design, affects the mixing and the mechanical shear stress appearing in the flow field. This in turn influences platelet activation state and blood cell destruction. In this study, a co-flowing confined jet similar to a return cannula flow configuration found in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was investigated experimentally. Cannula diameters, flow rate ratios between the jet and the co-flow and cannula position were studied using Particle Image Velocimetry and Planar Laser Induced Fluorescence. The jet was turbulent for all but two cases, in which a transitional regime was observed. The mixing, governed by flow entrainment, shear layer induced vortices and a backflow along the vessel wall, was found to require 9&#x02013;12 cannula diameters to reach a fully homogeneous mixture. This can be compared to the 22&#x02013;30 cannula diameters needed to obtain a fully developed flow. Although not significantly affecting mixing characteristics, cannula position altered the development of the flow structures, and hence the shear stress characteristics.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>ECMO</kwd>
<kwd>return cannula</kwd>
<kwd>confined jet</kwd>
<kwd>mixing</kwd>
<kwd>shear stress</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="13"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="56"/>
<page-count count="18"/>
<word-count count="10557"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving treatment used for patient suffering from acute refractory respiratory or cardio-respiratory failure, offering both circulatory and respiratory support. During the COVID-19 pandemic, ECMO has been widely used for cardio-pulmonary support. In Europe only, over 2687 patients (data from January 11) have at this point received ECMO treatment. Although associated with a relatively high survival rate, ECMO is not complication free. Cerebral bleedings and thromboembolism are the most common severe complications leading to death in 80&#x02013;85% of the cases (Dalton et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2015</xref>; Fletcher-Sandersj&#x000F6;&#x000F6; et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2017</xref>). These complications are associated with blood component damage/activation with subsequent increased risks of hemolysis, thrombosis, and emboli (Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2019b</xref>). Thrombus has been observed in tubing connectors, cannulae, in the artificial lung, as well as in the blood pumps (Fraser et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2012</xref>; Fujiwara et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2017</xref>; Hastings et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2017</xref>). In the complete circuit, venous blood is drained via a drainage cannula from a major vein and then pumped through a membrane lung (artificial lung, oxygenator) where carbon dioxide is cleared from the blood and the blood is re-oxygenated before it is reinfused back into the patient via a return cannula. If the return cannula is placed on the venous side of the patient&#x00027;s circulation veno-venous ECMO (lung support) is offered. If the return is into the arterial side of the circulation veno-arterial ECMO for cardio-pulmonary support is provided. The cannula, pump, and membrane lung are connected with 3/8 inch tubing in the ECMO circuit for the adult. In small children and the newly born the tubing size is of 3/16 or 1/4 inch inner diameter. The recirculation fraction (R<sub><italic>f</italic></sub>) (proportion of extracorporeal flow not contributing to the patient&#x00027;s oxygenation) reflects the intrinsic problem associated with veno-venous (VV) ECMO where an immediate drainage of the extracorporeally oxygenated blood reduces the effective flow. Recirculation fraction has no direct influence on complications such as thrombosis. Instead it is indirect, resulting from when the provider increases ECMO blood flow to compensate for R<sub><italic>f</italic></sub>, leading to enhanced mixing and higher shear stresses. Recirculation is affected by factors such as the cannula position, orientation, and design (van Heijst et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2001</xref>; K&#x000F6;rver et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2012</xref>; Palm&#x000E9;r et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2016</xref>). Adjusting the position of the cannulae can lower the recirculation factor from 46% returned oxygenated ECMO blood being directly drained back into the ECMO circuit to as little as 10% (Broman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2015</xref>; Palm&#x000E9;r et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2016</xref>). Hence, improving the understanding of mixing properties between oxygenated blood and native blood in the area of return prior to entering the volume from which blood is drained out into the ECMO circuit is of great importance. Moreover, mixing characteristics depends on the flow regime, and directly connected to the flow rates and geometrical dimensions of cannula and vessel.</p>
<p>Regarding thrombus composition, it varies depending on the formation process, where artificial surfaces as well as flow characteristics as regions of high- and low- shear stresses have been identified as locus for platelet activation (Casa and Ku, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2017</xref>). Also, the response of platelets to stress is likely to depend on the type of stress (Qiu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2014</xref>), i.e., normal and shear stresses. Once activated, platelets may aggregate on artificial surfaces or in low-shear regions binding to fibrin more easily. Also, non-physiological high shear activation induces loss of platelet surface receptors. This may lead to weaker binding to collagen and von Willebrand factor (vWF) at sites of vascular injury where exposure time to high shear stress is a factor. The conditions faced by the platelets leading to activation have been investigated in many studies (see Mains-Balle et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2018</xref>; van der Meijden and Heemskrek, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2019</xref> for recent reviews). Moreover, mathematical models based on empirical correlations between thrombus growth and shear rate have been developed (Bark et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2012</xref>; Mehrabadi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">2016</xref>; Ku et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2017</xref>). However, the intensity of the shear stress is not the only determinant factor for platelet activation. According to Hellums (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1994</xref>) and Jesty et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2003</xref>), platelets can be activated, or even damaged (Giersiepen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">1990</xref>), through a short exposure to a high shear stress as well as through a long exposure to a moderate shear stress. Yin et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2011</xref>) also highlighted that a pulsatile low shear stress potentially could lead to enhanced risk for thrombosis. To take account of the shear stress amplitude and the time of exposure to this shear stress, Nobili et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2008</xref>) proposed Platelet Activation State (PAS) as a parameter to quantify the platelet activation probability. Using this parameter, Fuchs et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2018</xref>) studied the different components of the ECMO circuit, reporting that the centrifugal pump head presents the highest risk of activation followed by the return cannula. Furthermore, elevated shear stress may also cause damage to the red blood cells (RBCs) inducing hemolysis (Blackshear, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">1972</xref>). Hemolysis thresholds have been determined by assessing the shear stress levels in a jet (Sallam and Hwang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">1984</xref>; Lu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2001</xref>), using viscometers (Wurzinger et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">1985</xref>), and in medical pumps (Fraser et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2012</xref>). As for platelet activation, the exposure time is important in hemolysis as it reduces the shear stress threshold needed to damage the RBCs (Leverett et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2018</xref>). To quantify the shear stress acting on blood constituents, both viscous shear stress (VSS) and Reynolds shear stress (RSS) have been used (Jones, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1995</xref>; Yen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Although, confined jets have been thoroughly studied in literature (Rajaratnam, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">1976</xref>; Rehab et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">1997</xref>; Kandakure et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2008</xref>) and still is a highly active field of research for various applications (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2020</xref>; Pathikonda et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2021</xref>), studies on highly confined jets such as a cannula inserted in a vessel are few. Moreover, commonly the co-flow in previous studies have been larger than the jet flow (for example flame stabilization), and not focusing on a situation where the co-flow is slower than the jet flow as may occur for cannula flows. In terms of numerical simulations of cannula blood flows, early work by Bedingham and Neavin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">1991</xref>) assessed probable sites for thrombus activation and deposition and De Wachter et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">1995</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1996</xref>) studied shear stress level in dialysis needle. More recently, Grigioni et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2002</xref>) and Menon et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2013</xref>) numerically investigated the effect of the geometry of the cannula on blood flow development. However, experimental data of the detailed flow characteristics remain scarce and are challenging due to the both the liquid (blood) and the components to be studied.</p>
<p>In this experimental study, the focus is on return cannula flows relevant for ECMO cannulation in VV ECMO. In VV ECMO, the blood is drained and returned in the inferior and superior vena cava (IVC and SVC, respectively), or <italic>vice versa</italic>, with the right atrium being the connecting volume in which the flow to and from the cannulae are communicating. From a fluid mechanical point of view, this is a highly complex flow case including multiscale physics as well as transient phenomena. Thus, in order to decompose the problem and to separate the effect due to the different variables, we have in this comprehensive study, adopted the approach to systematically study the effect of return cannula position and flow rates in both cannula and vessel, considering a simplified geometry. In our previous study, Lem&#x000E9;tayer et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2020</xref>), the flow structures and velocity field characteristics of a smaller cannula was studied. In this study, the aim was to study the impact of the flow on in particular mixing characteristics and shear stresses. Considering also a larger cannula diameter enabled larger flow rates to be assessed, including a wider range of cannula to vessel flow rate ratios and the effect of change in confinement.</p>
<p>Although ECMO is the clinical application forming the basis of this study, cannula flows in which blood is drained from or returned to the circulatory system is relevant in several medical situations where the geometry of the cannula, its position in the vessel and the flow rates are parameters affecting the flow characteristics and potentially increase in risk of thrombus formation and/or hemolysis.</p></sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2. Experimental Methods and Materials</title>
<sec>
<title>2.1. Experimental Rig</title>
<p>To represent the flow configuration with a cannula in a vessel, two coaxial tubes were used where the outer and inner glass tubes represented the vessel and the cannula, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>). The outer glass tube had a diameter <italic>D</italic> = 18.3 mm whereas two different cannulae were investigated, a smaller cannula having an inner diameter <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> = 3.2 mm and an outer diameter <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic><sub><italic>O</italic></sub></sub> = 5 mm and a larger cannula having a inner diameter <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> = 5.5 mm and an outer diameter <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic><sub><italic>O</italic></sub></sub> = 7.5 mm. In ECMO, cannulae are available in sizes from 6 to 29 French (Fr, 1 Fr = 1/3&#x000D7; the outer cannula diameter d<sub><italic>o</italic></sub> in millimeters). The cannulae investigated here are similar to the inner diameter of a 13 and 21 Fr cannula, respectively<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0001"><sup>1</sup></xref>. Regarding the dimensions chosen, the outer tube diameter is in accordance with literature reporting that the IVC mean diameter varies between 18 and 20 mm (Prince et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">1983</xref>; Finnerty et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2017</xref>). However, the IVC diameter do vary between inhalation and exhalation phases. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>, two flow circuits were used; one driving the co-flow mimicking the native venous flow and second using a centrifugal blood pump to drive the cannula flow. The 500 mm long cannula was positioned so that the cannula tip (exit) was localized at half height of the outer tube. These lengths were chosen to guarantee a stationary flow in each tube upstream of the cannula tip. To enable studying the flow of a cannula positioned closer to the vessel wall, an inclination system at the base of the experimental set-up (rotation axis on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>) was used to tilt the cannula relative to the outer tube. However, the dimensions of the tubes limited the tilt angle of the cannula to a maximum of &#x003B1; &#x0003C;0.5&#x000B0;. In the following, the cannula displacement will be referred to as a <italic>lateral shift</italic> with its tip position defined by <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub>, the distance between the cannula centreline and the outer tube centreline.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Scheme of the experimental rig with the instrumentation including a picture of the cannula inside the outer tube with corresponding dimensions. The co-flow flow circuit is the equivalent of the native venous flow circuit. <bold>(B)</bold> Pictures of cannula alignment for the three different positions studied. <bold>(C)</bold> Drawing of the tube system showing the dimensions of the inlet elements and the inclination system: length tube before constriction <italic>l</italic> = 400 mm, cannula length <italic>l</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 500 mm, and outer tube length <italic>L</italic> = 1 m.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The fluid used in the experiments was water with a temperature of (23&#x000B1;2&#x000B0;C). The choice of water was motivated by the strong shear rates expected in cannula flows. For shear rates greater than 100s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, blood viscosity is (almost) Newtonian and about 2&#x02013;4 times that of water depending on hematocrit (In ECMO hematocrit levels of 20&#x02013;40% may be used and depends on the providing ECMO center). This in turn makes it possible to scale the flow using the Reynolds number.</p>
<p>To reduce undesired optical deformations due to the curvature of the outer tube, the two glass tubes were surrounded by a rectangular glass box filled with water. Moreover, flow and pressure transducers were positioned at positions as indicated by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>.</p>
<p>The coordinate system used is defined by the axial axis <italic>x</italic> and the radial axis <italic>r</italic>. The origin of the axes was located where the outer tube centreline intersects the cannula tip cross-section. The notation applied for the mean velocity, instantaneous velocity and the root-mean-square (rms) fluctuations along x-axis are <italic>U</italic>, <italic>u</italic>, and <italic>u</italic>&#x02032;, respectively. Similarly, <italic>V</italic>, <italic>v</italic>, and <italic>v</italic>&#x02032; represent the mean velocity, the instantaneous velocity, and the rms fluctuations along the r-axis.</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2. Measurements Techniques</title>
<p>Two different measurement techniques were used: Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (PLIF). The interrogation window in which flow characteristics were measured was located in a vertical plane along the cannula axis from the cannula tip up to 60 mm downstream.</p>
<p>For PIV, solid particles of Zirconium oxide having a diameter of 5 &#x003BC;m were used as tracer particles. The PIV system was composed of a high-speed Nd:YAG laser operating at 532 nm, a Dantec high-speed double frame CCD camera (12-bit pixel depth with a sensor 1,920 &#x000D7; 1,200 pix) having a Nikkor 105 mm lens (<italic>f</italic>/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>max</italic></sub> = 1.8, Nikon). A 20 mm extension ring was applied to reach a magnification factor of about 31 pix/mm. The laser sheet was formed with a combination of lenses and aligned to pass through the center of the tubes. The laser sheet thickness was 1 mm. For each case, 1,000 double images were acquired at 200 Hz.</p>
<p>To acquire the velocity field from the PIV measurements, an in-house software developed by Lecordier and Trinit&#x000E9; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2004</xref>) was applied. This method uses a multi-pass algorithm with an original iterative deformation of the particle images to progressively suppress the bias induced by the velocity gradients and improves the calculation at the interface between the jet and the co-flow. The number of spurious vectors never exceeded 1% of the total number of vectors. Calculating the cut-off wavenumber (Foucaut et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2004</xref>), the spatial resolution of the PIV measurement in the current configuration was 185 &#x003BC;m.</p>
<p>PLIF images were acquired to study mixture characteristics in the same plane as used for PIV. A qualitative measurement was performed at 200 Hz. The system used was similar to that used for PIV, except for an optical filter OG570 added in front of the camera to collect only the fluorescent signal. Due to the non-linearity of the response of the Dantec camera to the fluorescence intensity, the quantitative mixture fraction measurement had to be performed at 5 Hz by a camera Lavision FlowMaster 3S with a Nikkor 50 mm lens (Nikon). For both measurements, the fluorescing tracer was an aqueous solution of Rhodamine B having a concentration of 50 &#x003BC;g/L ejected from the cannula.</p>
<p>For the quantitative measurement of the mixture fraction, a first signal calibration was carried out in a fluorescence cell to determine the dye concentration range yielding a linear dependence of the fluorescence signal with the concentration and the power laser. Afterwards, a second calibration was carried out in the test section by filling the entire volume to validate the first calibration <italic>in situ</italic>. Based on the method described by Balusamy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2010</xref>) and adapted from the formulation proposed by Shan et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2004</xref>), this calibration was used to correct the spatial inhomogeneity of the laser sheet energy and the shot-to-shot variation of the total laser energy. Here, the spatial distribution of energy in the laser sheet was assumed to not change between each laser pulse. The spatial resolution of the PLIF measurement was determined by considering the response of the camera to a step-like transition in the light intensity (Smith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">1997</xref>). In the present case, the spatial resolution of the PLIF system was measured at 250 &#x003BC;m from the fluorescence signal transition thickness induced by a sharp obstacle placed in the laser sheet.</p>
<p>Due to the laser reflections on the outer tube and cannula tip and optical deformation due to the outer tube curvature, it was not possible to resolve the velocity field in the near-wall region and close to the cannula tip. Thus, velocity measurement interrogation window started 1 mm downstream of the cannula tip. Also, along the wall, a 1 mm wide region (radial direction) was excluded from the measurements. Further details regarding sensitivity assessment of the experimental setup and measurement technique are found in Lem&#x000E9;tayer et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2020</xref>).</p></sec>
<sec>
<title>2.3. Case Set-Up</title>
<p>Fourteen different cases were studied (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The same set of measurements were carried out for both cannulae and the parameters changed were cannula flow rate (<italic>Q</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub>) and lateral position (<italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub>). To capture a dynamically similar flow as occurring in the IVC for flowing blood, the Reynolds number was used as a scaling factor. Hence, the co-flow (using water as liquid medium) was scaled by keeping the Reynolds number estimated from an expected IVC flow rate and blood viscosity constant. This resulted in a flow rate in the outer tube (<italic>Q</italic><sub><italic>o</italic></sub>, co-flow) of 1.3 L/min, corresponding to a flow velocity of approximately 0.1 m/s. Different flow rate ratios (<italic>Q</italic> = <italic>Q</italic><sub><italic>o</italic></sub>/<italic>Q</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub>) were investigated, namely: <italic>Q</italic> = 1, 0.5, 0.33, and 0.25, corresponding to cannula flow rates of 1.3, 2.6, 3.9, and 5.2 L/min, respectively. However, for the smaller cannula only the two larger flow rate ratios (<italic>Q</italic> = 1 and 0.5) were studied. The reason for this was due to the smaller cannula diameter, allowing for a maximum flow rate of 2.6 L/min. The choice of flow rates investigated were based on the return cannula flows used in VV ECMO, commonly between 3.5 and 5 L/min.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>The investigated cases and the associated cannula flow rate (<italic>Q</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub>), outer tube (vessel) flow rate (<italic>Q</italic><sub><italic>o</italic></sub>), and cannula position (<italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub>).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Number case</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Flow rate cannula <italic>Q</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> (L/min)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Flow rate outer tube <italic>Q</italic><sub><italic>o</italic></sub> (L/min)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Cannula position <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> (mm)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Jet velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mstyle mathvariant='bold-italic' mathsize='normal'><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mstyle><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle mathvariant='bold-italic' mathsize='normal'><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (m/s)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Reynolds number <italic>Re</italic><sub><italic>jet</italic></sub></bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7 (3.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8,620</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.4 (6.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17,240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 3<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7 (3.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8,620</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 4<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.4 (6.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17,240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 5<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;3.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.7 (3.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8,620</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 6<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;3.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.4 (6.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17,240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9 (1.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 2<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8 (2.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10,030</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.8 (3.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15,050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 4<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.7 (4.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20,060</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 1a<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.8 (1.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4,510</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 1b<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1 (1.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5,520</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 2a<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;1.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8 (2.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10,030</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 2b<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;3.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8 (2.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10,030</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>For each case, the jet velocity [from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C0;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mstyle class="text"><mml:mtext class="textit" mathvariant="italic">4</mml:mtext></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and the corresponding Reynolds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003C1;</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003BC;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> where d is either d<sub>SC</sub> or d<sub>LC</sub> depending on case) is provided. Moreover, in-between brackets, the by PIV measured velocity at the jet axis, i.e., not integrated over the outlet area, is provided</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>From hereon, the following nomenclature will be used: <italic>jet, interface</italic>, and <italic>d</italic> refer to the cannula jet, the interface between the jet and the co-flow, and the inner diameter of either the small or the large cannula (<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> or <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>), respectively. Moreover, when the cannula is shifted to the left, the left side of the jet will be referred to as the <italic>narrow side</italic> and the right side as the <italic>wide side</italic> (Case 3<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> to 6<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>).</p></sec></sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3. Results</title>
<p>To ensure the symmetry of the flow, measurements of the flow velocity and its fluctuations were performed for two symmetric positions of the cannula relative to the outer tube centreline. The results, presented in Lem&#x000E9;tayer et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2020</xref>), showed excellent agreement. Thus, detailed experiments were only carried out tilting the cannula toward one side relative the outer tube centreline.</p>
<sec>
<title>3.1. General Flow Characteristics</title>
<p>Except for Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, the cannula flows investigated were fully turbulent. The co-flow upstream of the cannula tip on the other hand, remained laminar at all times. For the smaller cannula, the resulting jet was turbulent and characterized by a Reynolds number based on the cannula flow rate <italic>Q</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> and the cannula inner diameter <italic>d</italic>, corresponding to <italic>Re</italic><sub><italic>jet</italic></sub> = 8,620 and <italic>Re</italic><sub><italic>jet</italic></sub> = 17,240 for <italic>Q</italic> = 1 and <italic>Q</italic> = 0.5, respectively. For the larger cannula, the jet was characterized by a Reynolds number ranging from <italic>Re</italic><sub><italic>jet</italic></sub> = 5,020 to <italic>Re</italic><sub><italic>jet</italic></sub> = 20,060 for <italic>Q</italic> = 1 and <italic>Q</italic> = 0.25, respectively. For Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, a transitional flow regime was observed where the flow altered between laminar, transitioning into turbulent to re-laminarize (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>, the Reynolds number for this case was 5,020. By altering the cannula flow rate by 10%, the flow remained either fully laminar or turbulent for decreasing or increasing flow rate, respectively.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> for which a transitional flow was observed. The figure shows four consecutive time instances highlighting how the flow went from turbulent to laminar and turning turbulent again.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Independent of cannula diameter or flow rate, the velocity fluctuations in the jet were found to be around 5% at <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 1.7, whereas close to zero in the co-flow region. However, as expected, at the interface between the jet and co-flow, the velocity fluctuations were larger, and highly unsteady due to the velocity gradient appearing in the shear layer. For the smaller cannula, the fluctuations were found to be twice that of the large cannula, 20 vs. 10%, respectively. Further downstream, flow unsteadiness was enhanced, reaching rms fluctuation values up to 30 and 50% for the large and small cannula, respectively. For the perturbations introduced by the jet to fully dissipate, 30 and 22 cannula diameters were required for the small and larger cannula, respectively (although the corresponding absolute distance increased with cannula diameter).</p>
<p>As presented in our previous work (Lem&#x000E9;tayer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2020</xref>), three main flow characteristics govern cannula flows characteristics (indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>); lateral entrainment (1), jet vortices (2), and recirculation zones (3) where also a larger-scale backflow motion developed. Obviously, this also applies for the larger cannula investigated here. Moreover, a lateral displacement of the cannula modifies the flow structures, altering the mixing characteristics and the residence times. On the narrow side, vortices cannot grow due to the proximity of the outer wall in which the recirculation disappears. The recirculation zone on the wide side is also altered, expanding in size and increasing the recirculating flow rate, displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4C</xref> via the negative streamwise velocity (here for the large cannula). As expected, a jet velocity at the cannula tip faster than the co-flow leads to entrainment of the co-flow by and into the jet (<italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 1.7, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4A,B</xref>). For the same <italic>Q</italic>, an increase in cannula diameter obviously results in lower cannula velocity and consequently a smaller relative velocity between cannula and co-flow. This in turn results in an entrainment radial velocity about three times lower than that of the small cannula case. Moreover, when tilted, the velocity fluctuations showed that the shear layer on the narrow side vanished earlier as compared to the central cannula configuration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>, <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> &#x02265; 6.7). Consequently, it can be hypothesized that as a larger shear layer region develops when <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0, a cannula positioned close to a vessel wall may expose the blood components to lower shear stress.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Streamlines for Case 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> (<italic>Q</italic> = 0.5 and <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0) superimposed with an instantaneous scalar field of the mixture fraction. The black lines at the y-axis indicates cannula outlet position.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Radial distributions of the averaged streamwise velocity component and corresponding rms fluctuations for the large cannula for <bold>(A)</bold> <italic>Q</italic> = 1 and <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0 (Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>), <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>Q</italic> = 0.5 and <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0 (Case 2<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>), and <bold>(C)</bold> <italic>Q</italic> = 0.5 and <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = &#x02212;3.4 mm (Case 2b<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>). <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> indicates the distance from the cannula tip normalized by cannula diameter (<italic>U</italic><sub>0</sub> corresponds to the averaged value of the streamwise velocity on the cannula axis). Cannula axis is represented by the dashed line.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Due to the confinement imposed by the outer tube, a backflow highly sensitive to modifications in cannula position and flow rate ratio developed. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref> presents the instantaneous flow patterns of the mixture fraction field at two different times. The presence of a backflow on each side of the jet is displayed with the two opposite flow directions highlighting its oscillatory nature. The origin of the backflow is found at a downstream location of similar absolute distance from the cannula tip, corresponding to around <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 18 and <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 10 &#x02212; 11 for the small and large cannula diameter, respectively. At this location, a separation point in the near-wall flow was found, splitting it into two streams: one moving downstream and another moving back upstream to form the backflow. Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) of the streamwise velocity fluctuations carried out for the small cannula showed a main frequency around 2 and 4 Hz for <italic>Q</italic> = 1 and 0.5, respectively. For the big cannula, the backflow frequency was found similar to that of the small cannula case, ranging from approximately 1&#x02013;5 Hz depending of <italic>Q</italic>, with increasing frequency with decreasing <italic>Q</italic>. Moreover, the main pulsation frequency remained close to constant independently of the cannula position for a specified flow rate. Thus, cannula flow has a larger influence on the pulsation frequency as compared to cannula position.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Instantaneous flow field of the mixture fraction for the Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> with a 1 s interval.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec>
<title>3.1.1. Possible Similarities</title>
<p>Considering the velocity magnitude estimated from the volume flow in co-flow and cannula flow, Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> are characterized by similar values; approximately 0.1 and 3.2 m/s for the co-flow and cannula, respectively. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6A</xref> displays the axial velocity decay normalized by the jet velocity according to <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> along the streamwise direction. By shifting the curve of the large cannula by 16 mm, it overlaps that of the small cannula. This is in line with the characteristics of self-similarity of co-flowing jets and localization of a virtual origin (Uddin and Pollard, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2007</xref>). Moreover, this also pinpoints the question regarding appropriate scaling factor(s) enabling capturing dynamic similarity. For instance, considering the initial phase of the streamwise velocity decay, similarity can be achieved if applying a scaling to Cases 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> based on the cannula diameter ratio [(<italic>x</italic> &#x0002B; 16)/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> &#x000D7; <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>], presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6B</xref>. It can be noted that <italic>D</italic> &#x02212; (<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> &#x02212; <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>)= 16 mm.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Streamwise velocity normalized by inlet jet velocity vs. distance from cannula tip for Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>, Case 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>, Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> as well as Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> shifted by 16 mm and <bold>(B)</bold> comparison of the decay of the streamwise velocity normalized by the averaged value of the streamwise velocity on the cannula axis near its exit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> for <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0 for the small cannula (Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>) and for the large cannula (Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> to 4<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>). The red symbols correspond to the streamwise velocity for Cases 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> applying the function: (<italic>x</italic> &#x0002B; 16)/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> &#x000D7; <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Moreover, as for a free jet, similarity of the radial profiles of the streamwise velocity can be achieved by a scaling factor. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7A</xref>, presenting the radial profiles at different downstream locations for Cases 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, shows that similarity exists between cases with similar initial velocities having different cannula diameters. For <italic>x</italic> &#x02264; 10 mm, similarity is achieved by scaling with the cannula diameter ratio (<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>) and by the centreline velocity, whereas for <italic>x</italic> &#x02265; 30 mm, the confinement suppresses the dependency to the cannula diameter ratio. Between <italic>x</italic> = 10 mm and <italic>x</italic> = 30 mm, a scaling factor of the type &#x003B1;&#x0002A;<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, with 1 &#x02264; &#x003B1;(<italic>x</italic>) &#x02264; <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>, proportional to the cannula diameter ratio and function of the downstream location, can be used to collapse the velocity profiles. For different <italic>Q</italic>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure 7B</xref>, the velocity profiles were found to match well although not to the same extent as for the cases with similar initial velocities. Moreover, Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> displays a sensibly different profile far downstream compared to all other cases investigated. This is due to the transitional flow regime characterizing this case, indicating that the flow similarity is solely valid for a turbulent cannula flow.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption><p>Radial distributions of the averaged streamwise velocity for <bold>(A)</bold> Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> and <bold>(B)</bold> all cases with <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0 at different distances from the cannula. For the large cannula cases, the radial position of profiles for <italic>x</italic> &#x02264; 10 mm is scaled by the cannula diameter ratio <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0007.tif"/>
</fig></sec></sec>
<sec>
<title>3.2. Mixing Characteristics</title>
<p>As the oxygenated blood is returned to the circulatory system in ECMO, it is important to understand the mixing properties of the oxygen-rich return flow and the oxygen-poor native flow.</p>
<p>To asses the mixing process, mixture fraction was used and defined as the local proportion of fluid originating from the jet. A comparison of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref> shows that the radial profiles of the mixture fraction widen faster than the velocity profiles, a feature due to the vortices formed along the interface of the jet. Also, directly at the interface, <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> &#x02264; 1.1, theses vortices exhibit strong fluctuations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figures 8</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>). In the current configuration, the shear layer at the interface and the backflow are the main sources for this rapid mixing. However, the backflow is the most important large-scale structure affecting the flow and the mixing, where the front of the backflow can be characterized by the mixture fraction fluctuations. As observed, significant fluctuations along the wall were found at <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 0.6 up to <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 5.7 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8A</xref>) indicating that the front position of the backflow is highly unsteady. Moreover, for the large cannula, it becomes clear that an increase in cannula flow, decreasing the flow rate ratio cannula to co-flow, moves the backflow and thus the mixing zone upstream, closer to the cannula tip. Low mixture fraction fluctuations are found at <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> &#x0003E; 10&#x02013;11.4, confirming that the mixing is complete around that location. Moreover, by further lowering <italic>Q</italic>, the mixture fracture in the large cannula reaches a close to constant profile at <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> &#x0003C; 10.</p>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>Figure 8</label>
<caption><p>Radial distributions of the averaged values of the mixture fraction (left) and corresponding rms (right) for <italic>Q</italic> = 1 for <bold>(A)</bold> Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> (<italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0) and <bold>(B)</bold> Case 5<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> (<italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = &#x02212;3.4 mm) at different distances from the cannula. Markers identical for &#x0003C; <italic>f</italic>&#x0003E; and <italic>f</italic>&#x02032;. Cannula axis represented by the dashed line.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0008.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>Figure 9</label>
<caption><p>Radial distributions for decreasing <italic>Q</italic> and <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0. The averaged mixture fraction (left figure) and its rms (right figure) are shown for <bold>(A)</bold> Case 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> (<italic>Q</italic> = 0.5), <bold>(B)</bold> Case 2<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> (<italic>Q</italic> = 0.5), and <bold>(C)</bold> Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> (<italic>Q</italic> = 0.33) (<italic>f</italic><sub>0</sub> corresponds to the averaged value of the mixture fraction on the cannula axis). Cannula axis is represented by the dashed line.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0009.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>A shift in the cannula position had no significant effect on the mean mixture fraction field (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8</xref>). However, an increase in mixture fraction fluctuations is observed on the narrow side of the jet at the cross-sections close to the cannula tip, especially for <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 3.4 mm. On the other hand, comparing <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure 8A</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure 9A</xref>, a decrease in <italic>Q</italic> considerably influenced the mixing characteristics. This is displayed by an increase in fluctuations on each side of the jet directly downstream of the cannula tip followed by a reduction in fluctuations at <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 5.7, indicating an already well-mixed flow.</p>
<sec>
<title>3.2.1. Mixing Efficiency</title>
<p>Comparing <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>, the radial profile of the mixture fraction approaches a close to constant profile over the cross-section faster than the velocity. Mixing efficiency can be defined as the length required to obtain a homogeneous mixture (i.e., occurrence of minimal or no mixing, characterized by no or very small spatial and/or temporal gradients) across the section of the outer tube. An indication thereof is provided by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10">Figure 10</xref> representing the mixture fraction along the axis. The mixture fraction remains constant from the cannula tip to 1&#x02212;2 cannula diameter downstream, where the turbulence level remains low (&#x0003C;10 %) avoiding an immediate decrease of the mixture fraction directly at the exit. A similar observation was made in the studies by Zhdanov et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2006</xref>) and Xia and Lam (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2009</xref>) having a 5% turbulence level. Furthermore, a comparison with <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref> shows that the mixture fraction decay follows the velocity decay until <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 7&#x02212;9, and is thus controlled by the flow convection. The axial profiles show that the mixture fraction reaches its asymptotic value <italic>f</italic><sub><italic>asy</italic></sub>=1/(1 &#x0002B; <italic>Q</italic>) around <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 9&#x02212;15. This is considerably faster as compared to the velocity characteristics requiring approximately 20&#x02013;30 cannula diameters in order to stabilize. This result is in agreement with measurements by Guiraud et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">1991</xref>) showing an asymptotic behavior from <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 14&#x02212;15 for the same diameter ratio as in Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and Case 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> for a flow rate ratio around 0.7.</p>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>Figure 10</label>
<caption><p>Comparison of the decay of the mixture fraction for <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0 for the small cannula (Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>) and for the large cannula (Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> to 4<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>) and also including some other studies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the averaged value of the mixture fraction on the cannula axis near its exit).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0010.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Shifting the position of the cannula affects the flow field as well as the mixing processes. To evaluate to what extent this position modification affects the point at which the flow can be considered homogeneously mixed, the following coefficient <italic>RT</italic> was defined:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="M6"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0222B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where</p>
<disp-formula id="E2"><label>(2)</label><mml:math id="M7"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0222B;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="false" class="mml-overline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo accent="true">&#x000AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>and</p>
<disp-formula id="E3"><label>(3)</label><mml:math id="M8"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mover accent="false" class="mml-overline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo accent="true">&#x000AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0222B;</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where a homogeneous mixture is characterized by a <italic>RT</italic> value approaching zero. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref> shows that although the flow structures change due to the cannula shift, in particular the recirculation, the mixture fraction is homogeneous at a cross-section at the same downstream distance independent of cannula position maintaining the same <italic>Q</italic>. Moreover, decreasing <italic>Q</italic> (faster cannula flow rate), results in a faster mixing. Comparing the small cannula cases with the large cannula cases for the same flow rate ratio, a similar level of mixing is found already at <italic>x</italic>/<italic>d</italic> = 4&#x02013;5. However, Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, having similar initial velocity magnitudes, display differences where Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> reaches a homogeneous mixture faster. Recalling the transitional regime observed for Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref> clearly shows the effect on mixing if the flow is in or close to the transition regime. Although having cannula flow rates only differing by 10%, the onset of mixing is clearly delayed as shown when comparing Cases 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, 1a<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, and 1b<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> as well as the length required to reach a homogeneous mixture. For a centered cannula, axisymmetry hypothesis enables calculation of <italic>R</italic> by integrating the mixture fraction over the cross-section resulting in the following equation:</p>
<disp-formula id="E4"><label>(4)</label><mml:math id="M9"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0222B;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="false" class="mml-overline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo accent="true">&#x000AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>&#x003C0;</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C0;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>resulting in an initial value and an early behavior different as compared to Equation (2), however, the mixing length remains similar.</p>
<fig id="F11" position="float">
<label>Figure 11</label>
<caption><p>Streamwise evolution of the coefficient <italic>RT</italic> for all cases investigated.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0011.tif"/>
</fig></sec></sec>
<sec>
<title>3.3. Shear Stress</title>
<p>As mentioned in the introduction, quantification of the shear stress in terms of VSS as well as turbulent shear stress is of interest for this flow configuration. VSS is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>&#x003BC;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where the summation convention for tensors holds, so in the present study <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003BC;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Considering the turbulent nature of the flow in the current study, the instantaneous stress varies significantly between different instants. Thus, the VSS was assessed for every measurement based on the instantaneous velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C4;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003BC;</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x02202;</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. RSS is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003C1;</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="false" class="mml-overline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="text"><mml:mtext class="textrm" mathvariant="normal">u&#x00027;</mml:mtext></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle class="text"><mml:mtext class="textrm" mathvariant="normal">v&#x00027;</mml:mtext></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo accent="true">&#x000AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The VSS magnitude, governed by the velocity gradient in the shear layer has, as expected, its maximum near the cannula tip and reaches values of about 4 Pa. Moving downstream, the VSS exponentially decreases. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13</xref> presents the RSS fields for both the small and large cannula at different flow rate ratios, showing that RSS is at least one order of magnitude greater than the VSS. Contrary to the VSS, the RSS remains high even far downstream due to large velocity fluctuations found throughout the entire cross-section.</p>
<p>Considering <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, a few observations can be made. Firstly, shifting the cannula position appears to lower the VSS, at least in terms of mean values. However, the maximum instantaneous value increases when tilted. Secondly, increasing cannula diameter lowers the VSS, in particular visible for the maximum instantaneous VSS.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Viscous shear stress characteristics for all cases: spatial maximum on the VSS mean field (1<italic>st</italic> column), maximum VSS over space and time (2<italic>nd</italic> column), VSS standard deviation where the maximum value of the mean VSS is located (3<italic>rd</italic> column), and spatial average of the standard deviation of VSS (4th column).</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Number case</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Maximum mean VSS (Pa)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Maximum instantaneous VSS (Pa)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>VSS standard deviation at maximum mean VSS location (Pa)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>VSS mean standard deviation (Pa)</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 3<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 4<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 5<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 6<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">19.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 2<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 4<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.52</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 1a<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 1b<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.15</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 2a<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Case 2b<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.29</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The velocity profiles in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref> shows that the shear layer dissipated faster when the cannula was tilted toward the vessel wall. This in turn indicated that the shear stresses in this area may be lower as compared to a centrally positioned cannula. This is confirmed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12</xref>, showing the radial distribution of the shear stress at different cross-sections for several flow cases investigated. Close to the cannula tip, there is little difference in-between central or tilted position (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figures 12A,B</xref>). However, moving further downstream, the shear stresses on the narrow side decreases with increasing <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub>. Also, on the wide side of the jet, the shear stresses had similar values independent of to what extent the cannula is tilted for lower jet velocities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12">Figure 12B</xref>). Regarding RSS, it was also affected by the position of the cannula. The more the cannula was shifted, the more the RSS decreased on the narrow side and increased on the wide side, coherent with the dissymmetry observed in the streamwise velocity fluctuations.</p>
<fig id="F12" position="float">
<label>Figure 12</label>
<caption><p>The shear stress profiles at different downstream locations for <bold>(A)</bold> the small cannula and <italic>Q</italic> = 0.5 (Case 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>, Case 4<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>, Case 6<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>) <bold>(B)</bold> the large cannula and <italic>Q</italic> = 0.5 (Case 2<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, Case 2a<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, Case 2b<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>), and <bold>(C)</bold> the large cannula and <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0 (Case 1<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, Case 2<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>, Case 4<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>), and the small cannula (Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>).</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0012.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> have as expected similar levels of shear stress in the shear layer region in close proximity of the cannula tip. However, further downstream this is no longer valid, a consequence of the velocity development, affected by the diameter of the jet core that is twice as large in the large cannula. This feature is also shown by the spatial distribution of RSS in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13">Figure 13</xref>, displaying higher values in the downstream region for the large cannula. An increase in cannula flow rate (<italic>Q</italic> &#x02265; 0.5) results in an increase in shear stresses and the observed increase in RSS is due to a considerable increase in velocity fluctuations along both the axial and radial directions. Thus, due to the high velocity fluctuations appearing in the flow field, RSS is of the same order of magnitude as the thresholds reported to activate platelets and increase risk of hemolysis (Sallam and Hwang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">1984</xref>; Hellums, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1994</xref>; Fraser et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2012</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2019a</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F13" position="float">
<label>Figure 13</label>
<caption><p>The Reynolds shear stress field for <bold>(A)</bold> Case 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> (<italic>Q</italic> = 1), <bold>(B)</bold> Case 2<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> (<italic>Q</italic> = 0.5), and <bold>(C)</bold> Case 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> (<italic>Q</italic> = 0.33). All with <italic>r</italic><sub><italic>c</italic></sub> = 0.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-09-630568-g0013.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec></sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>4. Discussion and Remarks</title>
<p>Capturing the flow dynamics in a cannula inserted in a vessel is a highly complex problem as there are several variables needed to be taken into account and that varies depending on the clinical situation of interest such as ECMO flows, blood viscosity, position, cannula diameter, and vessel to cannula diameter ratio.</p>
<p>In this work, the research approach was to minimize complexity, in terms of both return cannula design and vessel geometry of the IVC, to enable identifying the underlying fluid dynamical structures influencing cannula performance, in particular in VV ECMO. Shifting the cannula position increases the flow complexity and allows, in a controlled environment, to approach the real situation using flexible cannulae, for which preliminary experiments shows that the cannula is unlikely to be centered in the vessel. Thus, understanding the flow structures involved in and governing mixing in cannula flows and how they are affected by position and operating conditions are important in order to at a later stage provide guidance to the medical community. In terms of geometrical simplification, it especially concerns the outer tube. The diameter used for the outer tube is among the highest values referred for an IVC diameter, meaning that the confinement in a medical situation would likely be more important. However, based on previous studies carried out on confined jets, especially Henzel&#x00027;s work (Henzler, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">1978</xref>), the flow structures observed in this study would still appear as long as the condition <italic>D</italic>/<italic>d</italic> &#x0003E; <italic>G</italic> &#x0002B; <italic>Q</italic> is valid, where <italic>G</italic> &#x02248; 1 at equal densities of the mixed fluid. Thus, considering that <italic>Q</italic> should be smaller than 1, the flow structures are expected to remain similar for an outer tube diameter not smaller than twice the cannula inner diameter.</p>
<p>Two different cannula diameters were investigated allowing flow rates from 1.3 to 5.2 L/min to be studied, and as mentioned before, chosen according to the flow rates used in VV ECMO, ranging between 3.5 and 5 L/min although flows of 2&#x02013;7 L/min are used in clinic and feasible with standard ECMO circuits. Using water in the flow circuit resulted in jet Reynolds numbers of 4,510&#x02013;20,060 (the incoming co-flow prior cannula tip remained laminar). In all except for the lowest Reynolds numbers, the flow was found to be fully turbulent. However, in the clinical situation, the larger viscosity of blood implies a lower Reynolds number. If estimating a Newtonian blood analog fluid to have 3.4 times the viscosity of water (hematocrit of about 40%), will result in an equivalent blood Reynolds number of about 1,350&#x02013;4,500 for the considered flow rates. However, in this context, it should be noted that in ECMO, the hematocrit level used by the different ECMO centers varies between 20 and 40%. A hematocrit level of 25% corresponds (at high shear rates) to a viscosity approximately twice that of water. Consequently, the Reynolds numbers obtained scaling with a blood analog Newtonian viscosity suggest that the flow is more likely to laminar to transitional rather than fully turbulent. Estimating the friction factor for a pipe flow using pressure drop measurements of cannula flows using blood (Broman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2019</xref>) indicates that the flow is possible to be in transition. Whether the flow is laminar, in transition or turbulent is of clinical importance as the flow regime will alter not only the forces but also the mixing characteristics as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11">Figure 11</xref>. As mixing is enhanced by turbulence, the reported mixing lengths required will be larger for a laminar flow. Moreover, if mimicking the flow in the IVC, the flow rate studied is lower than what would be expected. Taking the blood viscosity in account, scaling the flow rates, the higher flow rate ratios (Q = 1 and 0.5) are more relevant from a clinical perspective. It is interesting to note that for the same Q, the small and large cannula perform similarly in terms of mixing length (normalized by diameter) required although initial mixing differentiated. Moreover, comparing Cases 1<sub><italic>SC</italic></sub> and 3<sub><italic>LC</italic></sub> having similar velocities in the cannula jet and co-flow, the large cannula performed better in terms of lowering mixing length required, associated with the larger Reynolds number obtained for the large cannula.</p>
<p>The flow is characterized by strong shear layers and the results show that the shear stresses found in the flow field are of an order comparable to the threshold reported in literature inducing platelet activation or damaging RBCs. This conclusion is not restricted by the use of water. Although using water, we are in our measurements capturing the larger flow scales, also expected to appear in blood. Moreover, even if a reduction of the shear stress magnitude may be expected with blood due to higher viscosity lowering the smallest turbulent scales, it is not only the level of shear stress that the blood constituents are exposed to that is of importance, but also the exposure time (Hellums, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1994</xref>; Fraser et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2012</xref>) that may increase in case of a more viscous fluid. It is commonly accepted that strong shear and long residence times (stagnant regions) are the main contributors for thrombus formation (Casa and Ku, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2017</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2019a</xref>). According to Hellums&#x00027;shear stress vs. exposure time threshold map, the time associated with the shear stresses in the current study (approximately 10<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> s) indicates that shear stress levels of the order of 100 Pa are sufficient to activate platelets. In this study, we chose to use two different formulations expressing the shear stress depending on their origin (TVSS and RSS) according to literature. Thus, the formulation used to define the shear stress has an impact on its value since the two formulations result in different orders of magnitude for the shear stress. Furthermore, thresholds measured from a constant shear stress device like viscometer are hardly comparable to the turbulent flow present in the return cannula due to the flow fluctuations making the shear stress varying in space and time. However, studies of real geometries can be used to infer a practical threshold. Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">1999</xref>) found a RSS of 52 Pa studying the flow in an aortic valve and pointed out that this magnitude of RSS is enough to damage RBCs and activate the platelets even if lower than the threshold usually defined. Thus, according to our investigations, the flow created by the reinjection of blood is highly susceptible to present shear stresses activating the platelets or damaging RBCs. However, it should be mentioned that in this study, the shear stress estimation is based on only two components due to the experimental set-up. Thus, the contributions of the third component and its fluctuations are not taken into account, that may lead to an underestimation of the actual shear stresses in the flow.</p>
<p>Shifting the cannula, the results show that the shear stress decreases as compared to the configuration with a centered cannula. On the other hand, the greater fluctuations of the shear stress when the cannula is shifted indicates that higher value of shear stress may be reached locally in the flow. Furthermore, the size of the recirculation zone on the wide side is larger, indicating that there is an elevated risk for platelets to be exposed to an increased residence time in that region. Thus, the presence of structures that can act in order to trap platelets, such as backflow or vortices, has a negative effect on platelet activation by increasing the potential of residing in zones of high shear stress as well during prolonged time. This resembles the observation made by Fuchs et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2018</xref>) focusing on platelet activation in ECMO circuit components. An increase in cannula flow rate will enhance the shear stress and the backflow characteristics. These results could be considered as an inducement for further developments to improve the control over the cannula position.</p>
<p>From the clinical perspective, the results from this work that directly apply to the clinical situation are (1) increased understanding how distances between the return and drainage cannula relate to R<sub><italic>f</italic></sub> in terms of mixing of the two blood streams, and (2) how cannula size and flow rate, or rather the difference in flow speed of a narrow vs. a wider cannula influences the shear layer (between cannula and native flow) and associated shear forces and thus platelet activation and trauma to the RBCs. With this new knowledge, a clinician can get assistance in choosing the cannula size and better positioning the return cannula in terms of recirculation and blood trauma (platelet activation) with the best interest of the patient in focus.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>5. Conclusion</title>
<p>In this experimental study of the flow dynamics in a return cannula, the main findings are as follows:</p>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item><p>Flow similarity was found for different cannula diameters having similar jet to co-flow velocity ratio. The scaling was found to change with downstream position <italic>x</italic>. From <italic>x</italic> &#x02264; 10 mm, the radial position was scaled with the diameter ratio (<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>SC</italic></sub>/<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>LC</italic></sub>) and the velocity with the average value of the streamwise velocity on the cannula axis (<italic>U</italic><sub>0</sub>). Moving downstream, a scaling factor &#x003B1; needed to be added to the diameter ratio. Also, for the streamwise velocity decay, scaling was found including a shift in streamwise direction combined with the diameter ratio.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Mixing was controlled by the lateral entrainment at cannula tip, the shear layer and the backflow along the wall. The first two are mainly governed by the flow rate ratio whereas the backflow was also sensitive to cannula position.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Decreasing co-flow to cannula flow rate ratio (i.e., increasing cannula flow) resulted in a more efficient initial mixing. However, the distance required to obtain a homogeneous mixing was less affected by the flow rate ratio where both cannulae for the same Q resulted in similar mixing lengths.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>The importance of flow regime (laminar, transition, or turbulent jet) and its effect on mixing length was clearly shown, where the laminar flow regime significantly increases the length required to obtain a homogeneous mixture.</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>Shifting the cannula toward the wall resulted in a faster dissipation of the shear layer on the narrow side of the cannula. In all cases investigated, the shifted cannula had a smaller area characterized by large velocity fluctuations, that in turn lead to lower shear stresses on the narrow side. On the wide side, the cannula diameter had an effect on the shear stress level. For the small cannula, shear stresses was at close distance to cannula tip affected by cannula position whereas for the large cannula, the shear stresses remained similar.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>From the clinical point of view, aiming at preventing recirculation of oxygenated ECMO blood, the results show that a minimum of 10&#x02013;12 cannula diameters are needed to obtain a homogeneous mixture of oxygenated blood and native blood. As shown, this depends on the flow regime and thus quantifying cannula flows using blood or blood analogs are important, in particular for the larger flow rates and cannula size. Moreover, a fully developed flow was obtained at a much larger distance (22&#x02013;30 cannula diameters), indicating that higher level of oxygenated blood may be transported over longer distances by the jet. Thus, if placing the drainage cannula too close to this region, this may increase <italic>R</italic><sub><italic>f</italic></sub>, i.e., directly draining oxygenated ECMO blood back into the ECMO circuit.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability-statement" id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p></sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>JL performed the experiments, analyzed the results, and drafted the manuscript. LB analyzed the results and critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content. LPW designed the concept, analyzed the results, and critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors approved for submission.</p></sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack><p>We thank Dr. Nils Tillmark, Prof. Laszlo Fuchs, and the workshop staff at the Fluid Physics Laboratory (KTH Mechanics) for their expertise regarding the design and construction of the experimental rig. We also thank Dr. Bertrand Lecordier for sharing his PIV algorithms and its corresponding advice.</p>
</ack>

<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Balusamy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <source>Etude exp&#x000E9;rimentale de la propagation de flammes dans un m&#x000E9;lange stratifi&#x000E9;</source> (<publisher-loc>Ph.D. thesis</publisher-loc>). INSA Rouen, Saint-&#x000C9;tienne-du-Rouvray, France.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bark</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Para</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ku</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Correlation of thrombosis growth rate to pathological wall shear rate during platelet accumulation</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Bioeng</source>. <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>2642</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2650</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bit.24537</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22539078</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bedingham</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neavin</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Application of finite element analysis for assessing biocompatibility of intra-arterial catheters and probes</article-title>. <source>ASAIO Trans</source>. <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>M179</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>M180</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1751100</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Blackshear</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;Mechanical hemolysis in flowing blood,&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>Biomechanics, Its Foundation and Objectives</source>, eds Y. C. Fung, N. Perrone, and M. Anliker (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall), <fpage>501</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>528</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broman</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Frenckner</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bj&#x000E4;llmark</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broom&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Recirculation during veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation - a simulation study</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Artif. Organs</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>30</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5301/ijao.5000373</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25588762</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broman</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prahl Wittberg</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westlund</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilbers</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perry da C&#x000E2;mara</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Swol</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Pressure and flow properties of cannulae for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation i: return (arterial) cannulae</article-title>. <source>Perfusion</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>58</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0267659119830521</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30966910</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Casa</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ku</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Thrombus formation at high shear rates</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng</source>. <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>415</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>433</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044539</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28441034</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mondal</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koenig</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Slaughter</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffith</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019a</year>). <article-title>High shear induces platelet dysfunction leading to enhanced thrombotic propensity and diminished hemostatic capacity</article-title>. <source>Platelets</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>112</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>119</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09537104.2017.1384542</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29182470</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kareem</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Conway</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arias</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019b</year>). <article-title>Device-induced platelet dysfunction in mechanically assisted circulation increases the risks of thrombosis and bleeding</article-title>. <source>Artif. Organs</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>745</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>755</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aor.13445</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30805954</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dalton</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garcia-Filion</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holubkov</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moler</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shanley</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heidemann</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Association of bleeding and thrombosis with outcome in extracorporeal life support</article-title>. <source>Pediatr. Crit. Care Med</source>. <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>167</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>174</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/PCC.0000000000000317</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25647124</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Wachter</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verdonck</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verhoeven</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hombrouckx</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Red cell injury assessed in a numeric model of a peripheral dialysis needle</article-title>. <source>ASAIO J</source>. <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>M524</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>M529</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00002480-199609000-00041</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8944934</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Wachter</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verhoeven</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verdonck</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;Calculation of steady and unsteady shear levels in hemodialysis,&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>WIT Transactions on Biomedicine and Health, Computer Simulations in Biomedicine III</source>, eds H. Powell and R. T. Hart (Southampton: Computational Mechanics Publications), <fpage>641</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>648</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Finnerty</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Panchal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boulger</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vira</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bischof</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amick</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Inferior vena cava measurement with ultrasound: What is the best view and best mode?</article-title> <source>Western J. Emerg. Med</source>. <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>496</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>501</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5811/westjem.2016.12.32489</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28435502</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fletcher-Sandersj&#x000F6;&#x000F6;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bartek</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thelin</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eriksson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elmi-Terander</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage in adult patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: an observational cohort study</article-title>. <source>J. Intens. Care</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>27</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40560-017-0223-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31911838</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foucaut</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carlier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanislas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>PIV optimization for the study of turbulent flow using spectral analysis</article-title>. <source>Meas. Sci. Technol</source>. <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1046</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1058</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0957-0233/15/6/003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fraser</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taskin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffith</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A quantitative comparison of mechanical blood damage parameters in rotary ventricular assist devices: shear stress, exposure time and hemolysis index</article-title>. <source>J. Biomech. Eng</source>. <volume>134</volume>:<fpage>081002</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1115/1.4007092</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22938355</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fuchs</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broman</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prahl Wittberg</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Flow-induced platelet activation in components of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep</source>. <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>13985</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-32247-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30228350</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fujiwara</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sakota</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohuchi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Endo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tahara</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Murashige</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Optical dynamic analysis of thrombus inside a centrifugal blood pump during extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support in a porcine model</article-title>. <source>Artif. Organs</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>893</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>903</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/aor.12862</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28321882</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giersiepen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wurzinger</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Opitz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reul</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Estimation of shear stress-related blood damage in heart valve prostheses - <italic>in vitro</italic> comparison of 25 aortic valves</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Artif. Organs</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>300</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>306</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/039139889001300507</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2365485</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grigioni</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daniele</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morbiducci</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>D&#x00027;Avenio</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Di Benedetto</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Del Gaudio</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Computational model of the fluid dynamics of a cannula inserted in a vessel: incidence of the presence of side holes in blood flow</article-title>. <source>J. Biomech</source>. <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>1599</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1612</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00231-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12445613</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guiraud</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bertrand</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costes</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Laser measurements of local velocity and concentration in a turbulent jet-stirred tubular reactor</article-title>. <source>Chem. Eng. Sci</source>. <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>1289</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1297</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0009-2509(91)85056-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hastings</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ku</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wagoner</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maher</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deshpande</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Sources of circuit thrombosis in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</article-title>. <source>ASAIO J</source>. <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>86</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>92</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MAT.0000000000000444</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27660905</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hellums</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>1993 whitaker lecture: biorheology in thrombosis research</article-title>. <source>Ann. Biomed. Eng</source>. <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>445</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>455</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02367081</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7825747</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Henzler</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <source>Investigations on mixing fluids</source> (<publisher-loc>Ph.D. thesis</publisher-loc>). RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jesty</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perrotta</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bluestein</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Platelet activation in a circulating flow loop: combined effects of shear stress and exposure time</article-title>. <source>Platelets</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>149</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/0953710031000092839</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12850838</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>A relationship between reynolds stresses and viscous dissipation: implications to red cell damage</article-title>. <source>Ann. Biomed. Eng</source>. <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>28</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02368297</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7762879</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kandakure</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patkar</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Patwardhan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Characteristics of turbulent confined jets</article-title>. <source>Chem. Eng. Process</source>. <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>1234</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1245</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cep.2007.03.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>K&#x000F6;rver</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ganushchak</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simons</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Donker</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maessen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weerwind</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Quantification of recirculation as an adjuvant to transthoracic echocardiography for optimization of dual-lumen extracorporeal life support</article-title>. <source>Intens. Care Med</source>. <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>906</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>909</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00134-012-2534-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22456771</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ku</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casa</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hastings</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Choice of a hemodynamic model for occlusive thrombosis in arteries</article-title>. <source>J. Biomech</source>. <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>110</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>113</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27899178</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lecordier</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trinit&#x000E9;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;Advanced piv algorithms with image distortion validation and comparison using synthetic images of turbulent flow,&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>Particle Image Velocimetry: Recent Improvements</source>, eds M. Stanislas, and J. Westerweel (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), <fpage>115</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-18795-7_9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lem&#x000E9;tayer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broman</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prahl Wittberg</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Confined jets in co-flow: effect of the flow rate ratio and lateral position of a return cannula on the flow dynamics</article-title>. <source>SN Appl. Sci</source>. <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>333</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42452-020-2077-9</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leverett</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hellums</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alfrey</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Red blood cell damage by shear stress</article-title>. <source>Biophys. J</source>. <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>273</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0006-3495(72)86085-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5016112</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Turbulence characteristics downstream of bileaflet aortic valve prostheses</article-title>. <source>J. Biomech. Eng</source>. <volume>122</volume>, <fpage>118</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>124</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1115/1.429643</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10834151</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>A reevaluation and discussion on the threshold limit for hemolysis in a turbulent shear flow</article-title>. <source>J. Biomech</source>. <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>1361</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1364</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00084-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11522317</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mains-Balle</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norgaard-Jeppesen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christensen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hvas</surname> <given-names>A.-M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Platelet function during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients: a systematic review</article-title>. <source>Front. Cardiovasc. Med</source>. <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>157</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcvm.2018.00157</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30474031</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mehrabadi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casa</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aidun</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ku</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A predictive model of high shear thrombus growth</article-title>. <source>Ann. Biomed. Eng</source>. <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>2339</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2350</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10439-016-1550-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31686309</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teslovich</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Undar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pekkan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Characterization of neonatal aortic cannula jet flow regimes for improved cardiopulmonary bypass</article-title>. <source>J. Biomech</source>. <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>362</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>372</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.10.029</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23195624</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nobili</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sheriff</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morbiducci</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Redaelli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bluestein</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Platelet activation due to hemodynamic shear stresses: damage accumulation model and comparison to <italic>in vitro</italic> measurements</article-title>. <source>ASAIO J</source>. <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>64</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>72</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MAT.0b013e31815d6898</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18204318</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Palm&#x000E9;r</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Palm&#x000E9;r</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hultman</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Broman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Cannula design and recirculation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation</article-title>. <source>ASAIO J</source>. <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>737</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>742</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/MAT.0000000000000440</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27660904</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pathikonda</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Usta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gills</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dhodapkar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Mixing behavior in a confined jet with disparate viscosity and implicationsfor complex reactions</article-title>. <source>Chem. Eng. J</source>. 403. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cej.2020.126300</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prince</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Novelline</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Athanasoulis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>The diameter of the inferior vena cava and its implications for the use of vena caval filters</article-title>. <source>Radiology</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>687</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>689</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1148/radiology.149.3.6647844</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6647844</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sakurai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mannino</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Platelet mechanosensing of substrate stiffness during clot formation mediates adhesion, spreading, and activation</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A</source>. <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>14430</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>14435</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1322917111</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25246564</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rajaratnam</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1976</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;Chapter 8: Confined jets,&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>Turbulent Jets, Vol. 5 of Developments in Water Science</source>, ed N. Rajaratnam (<publisher-loc>Amsterdam</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>148</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>183</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0167-5648(08)70908-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rehab</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Villermaux</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hopfinger</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Flow regimes of large-velocity-ratio coaxial jets</article-title>. <source>J. Fluid Mech</source>. <volume>345</volume>, <fpage>357</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>381</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S002211209700637X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sallam</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Human red blood cell hemolysis in a turbulent shear flow: contribution of reynolds shear stresses</article-title>. <source>Biorheology</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>783</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>797</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3233/BIR-1984-21605</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6240286</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dimotakis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Scalar concentration measurements in liquid-phase flows with pulsed lasers</article-title>. <source>Exp. Fluids</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>268</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>273</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00348-003-0717-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <source>The Scientist and Engineer&#x00027;s Guide to Digital Signal Processing</source>. <publisher-loc>San Diego, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>California Technical Publishing</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Uddin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pollard</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Self-similarity of coflowing jets: the virtual origin</article-title>. <source>Phys. Fluids</source> <volume>19</volume>:<fpage>068103</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.2740709</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van der Meijden</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heemskrek</surname> <given-names>J. W. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Platelet biology and functions: new concepts and clinical perspectives</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Caradiol</source>. <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>166</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>179</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41569-018-0110-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30429532</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Heijst</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van der Staak</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Haan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liem</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Festen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geven</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Recirculation in double lumen catheter veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation measured by an ultrasound dilution technique</article-title>. <source>ASAIO J</source>. <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>372</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>376</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00002480-200107000-00015</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11482489</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.-T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>L&#x000FC;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Temporal instability analysis of a confined non-newtonian liquid jet with heat and mass transfer</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Mech</source>. <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>350</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>356</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.euromechflu.2020.07.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wurzinger</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Opitz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blasberg</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmid-Schonbein</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Platelet and coagulation parameters following millisecond exposure to laminar shear stress</article-title>. <source>Thromb. Haemost</source>. <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>381</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>386</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1055/s-0038-1657744</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2934855</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Velocity and concentration measurements in initial region of submerged round jets in stagnant environment and in coflow</article-title>. <source>J. Hydro Environ. Res</source>. <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>34</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jher.2009.03.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chern</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The effect of turbulent viscous shear stress on red blood cell hemolysis</article-title>. <source>J. Artif. Organs</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>178</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>185</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10047-014-0755-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24619800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shanmugavelayudam</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rubenstein</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The effect of physiologically relevant dynamic shear stress on platelet and endothelial cell activation</article-title>. <source>Thromb. Res</source>. <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>235</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>241</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.thromres.2010.11.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21172720</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhdanov</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kornev</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hassel</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chorny</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Mixing of confined coaxial flows</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Heat Mass Trans</source>. <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>3942</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3956</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.04.022</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0001"><p><sup>1</sup>The cannula size (diameter) refers to the outer cannula diameter (<italic>d</italic><sub><italic>o</italic></sub>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>). The wall thickness is in general 0.39&#x02013;0.4 mm for cannulae &#x0003C;15 Fr. In lager cannulae the wall thickness is approximately 0.49 mm. The glass tube wall thickness used here is about 0.75 mm. Hence, the inner diameter of the smaller cannula equals a 13 Fr cannula, but <italic>d</italic><sub><italic>S</italic><sub><italic>C</italic></sub><sub><italic>O</italic></sub></sub> corresponds to a 15 Fr cannula. For the larger cannula, the corresponding values are 21 and 24 Fr.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure"><p><bold>Funding.</bold> This work was funded by Region Stockholm through grant HMT2018.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>