<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-4185</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2016.00073</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Bioengineering and Biotechnology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Enhanced Product Recovery from Glycerol Fermentation into 3-Carbon Compounds in a Bioelectrochemical System Combined with <italic>In Situ</italic> Extraction</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Roume</surname> <given-names>Hugo</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://frontiersin.org/people/u/124329"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Arends</surname> <given-names>Jan B. A.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://frontiersin.org/people/u/312809"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ameril</surname> <given-names>Camar P.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://frontiersin.org/people/u/364417"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Patil</surname> <given-names>Sunil A.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>&#x02020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://frontiersin.org/people/u/277673"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Rabaey</surname> <given-names>Korneel</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">&#x0002A;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://frontiersin.org/people/u/307907"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Ghent University</institution>, <addr-line>Gent</addr-line>, <country>Belgium</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Daniel Puyol, King Juan Carlos University, Spain</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Johannes Geiselmann, Joseph Fourier University, France; Adri&#x000E1;n Escapa, University of Le&#x000F3;n, Spain</p></fn>
<corresp content-type="corresp" id="cor1">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Korneel Rabaey, <email>korneel.rabaey&#x00040;ugent.be</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="fn001"><p><sup>&#x02020;</sup>Present address: Sunil A. Patil, Institute of Environmental and Sustainable Chemistry, Technische Universit&#x000E4;t Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>Specialty section: This article was submitted to Microbiotechnology, Ecotoxicology and Bioremediation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>4</volume>
<elocation-id>73</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>08</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>06</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2016 Roume, Arends, Ameril, Patil and Rabaey.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Roume, Arends, Ameril, Patil and Rabaey</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Given the large amount of crude glycerol formed as a by-product in the biodiesel industries and the concomitant decrease in its overall market price, there is a need to add extra value to this biorefinery side stream. Upgrading can be achieved by new biotechnologies dealing with recovery and conversion of glycerol present in wastewaters into value-added products, aiming at a zero-waste policy and developing an economically viable process. In microbial bioelectrochemical systems (BESs), the mixed microbial community growing on the cathode can convert glycerol reductively to 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PDO). However, the product yield is rather limited in BESs compared with classic fermentation processes, and the synthesis of side-products, resulting from oxidation of glycerol, such as organic acids, represents a major burden for recovery of 1,3-PDO. Here, we show that the use of an enriched mixed-microbial community of glycerol degraders and <italic>in situ</italic> extraction of organic acids positively impacts 1,3-PDO yield and allows additional recovery of propionate from glycerol. We report the highest production yield achieved (0.72&#x02009;mol<sub>1,3-PDO</sub> mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup><sub>glycerol</sub>) in electricity-driven 1,3-PDO biosynthesis from raw glycerol, which is very close to the 1,3-PDO yield reported thus far for a mixed-microbial culture-based glycerol fermentation process. We also present a combined approach for 1,3-PDO production and propionate extraction in a single three chamber reactor system, which leads to recovery of additional 3-carbon compounds in BESs. This opens up further opportunities for an economical upgrading of biodiesel refinery side or waste streams.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>bioelectrochemical systems</kwd>
<kwd>resource recovery</kwd>
<kwd><italic>in situ</italic> extraction</kwd>
<kwd>1,3-propanediol</kwd>
<kwd>propionate</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="28"/>
<page-count count="8"/>
<word-count count="5644"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="introduction">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Biodiesel production, as a promising alternative and renewable fuel, has continuously grown over the past decade (Clomburg and Gonzalez, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2013</xref>). However, growth in its production has been less than the anticipated target and has increased at a slower pace during the last few years (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2012</xref>). According to an internal review published by BP Company, world biofuels increased by 0.9% in 2015, the slowest rate of growth since output declined in 2000 (BP Statistical Review of World Energy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2016</xref>). The main reason is its relatively high production cost. For every tone of biodiesel produced by transesterification of animal or vegetable oils, 100&#x02009;kg of crude glycerol is coproduced (Mattam et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">2013</xref>). The expansion of the biodiesel industry has, thus, created a surplus of glycerol, resulting in an abundance of waste glycerol now considered as a waste stream with associated disposal costs and a concomitant decrease in its overall market price. For instance, during 2004&#x02013;2011, the biodiesel production has increased by 25 times and the market price of crude glycerol (80% pure) has decreased by a factor three in the USA (Clomburg and Gonzalez, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2013</xref>). Therefore, it is of major importance to find a recycling solution for this waste glycerol to make biodiesel production more sustainable and economically viable.</p>
<p>There are several approaches for direct utilization of crude glycerol or to convert it into higher-value products by means of biotechnological or chemical processes (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2013</xref>). Compared with direct application and chemical transformation, microbial conversion of glycerol into other 3-carbon compounds by oxidation or reduction processes is a viable alternative that avoids certain disadvantages, such as low product specificity, high-energy input, and extensive pretreatment requirements (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2013</xref>). Particularly, the most promising approach is to use glycerol as a substrate for bioconversion into 1,3-propandiol (1,3-PDO) <italic>via</italic> the intermediate 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde (3-HPA).</p>
<p>A wide variety of pure and engineered microorganisms have been used for glycerol conversion into value-added products (Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2013</xref>). For example, an engineered strain of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> has been able to reach the highest product yield (1.09&#x02009;mol<sub>1,3-PDO</sub> mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup><sub>glycerol</sub>), productivity (2.61&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), and high final 1,3-PDO concentration (104.4&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) from glycerol (Tang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2009</xref>). Compared with pure cultures, the use of a mixed-microbial community considerably decreases the production cost of a bulk chemical by working with simplified medium and under non-sterile conditions. Mostly, mixed cultures from different environmental sources such as sediments, sewage sludge, compost, decaying straw, mud, anaerobic distillery wastewater, and soil samples have been used directly for 1,3-PDO production (Dietz and Zeng, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>). To the best of our knowledge, neither pre-selection nor enrichment of a specialized microbial community converting glycerol into 1,3-PDO has been reported in the literature.</p>
<p>The recovery of glycerol into 1,3-PDO has mainly been reported <italic>via</italic> anaerobic fermentation using a mixed-microbial culture (Dietz and Zeng, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>; Moscoviz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2016</xref>). One of the emerging approaches for resource recovery from wastes is the use of bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) that exploit microorganisms to catalyze redox reactions in an electrochemical cell (Arends and Verstraete, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">2012</xref>). With BESs, electrical current can be used to drive fermentation toward the production of valuable chemicals from industrial wastes or side-streams, such as glycerol (Dennis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>). Imposing a cathodic current on a mixed-microbial consortium fermenting glycerol has been shown to stimulate the conversion of glycerol into 1,3-PDO (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2013</xref>). Cathodic current is considered to favor microbial reduction processes by enhancing cells&#x02019; ability to regenerate NAD<sup>&#x0002B;</sup> into NADH and is, thus, able to alter fermentation profiles (Dennis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>). Indeed, a critical NAD<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>/NADH ratio higher than 4, has previously been correlated with a high 1,3-PDO productivity and high specific growth rate of <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> (Du et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2006</xref>). However, as evident in many fermentation processes using a mixed-microbial community, side-products are often generated (Marshall et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2012</xref>). During glycerol fermentation, pyruvate, the end product of the glycolysis pathway will compete with 3-HPA for NADH-oxidoreductase to form various organic acids as by-products, such as propionic acid (Dennis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>). A concomitant decrease in the yield of 1,3-PDO has indeed been found with an increase in propionic acid production in a BES fed with glycerol (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>In order to enhance the overall product recovery from a glycerol fermentation process into 1,3-PDO, by-products formed in the pyruvate reduction pathway should, thus, be maintained at the lowest level, stopped from being formed, or removed from the fermentation broth. Andersen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2014</xref>) have recently reported an approach to <italic>in situ</italic> extract carboxylates generated during bioelectrochemical fermentation <italic>via</italic> membrane electrolysis across an anion exchange membrane (AEM) in BESs. Here, we hypothesize that the use of this BES-based carboxylate extraction technology in combination with the use of an enriched glycerol degrading mixed-microbial community as an inoculum should allow us to reach an optimized 1,3-PDO production yield and enhanced recovery of valuable by-products, such as carboxylates, generated during the electro-fermentation of glycerol.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2-1">
<title>Enrichment of a Specialized Glycerol-Degrading Microbial Community</title>
<p>A floating sludge sample from the first basin of the wastewater treatment plant of an oleochemical industry (Oleon NV, Ertvelde, Belgium) was used to enrich the specialized glycerol-degrading microbial community. The selection of this community was motivated by the high load of chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 3716&#x02009;kg COD day<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, mainly from fatty acid synthesis as well as biodiesel production. The sample contained mainly propionate (315&#x02009;mg COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), acetate (173&#x02009;mg COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), and glycerol (160&#x02009;mg COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>). Samples were stored at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C and revived following the protocol as described by Kerckhof et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2014</xref>) using cryoprotection agents, such as dimethyl sulfoxide, plus trehalose and tryptic soy broth. Enrichment of glycerol degraders was performed in 20&#x02009;mL Balch tubes using modified homoacetogenic medium (HA medium) as described by Patil et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2015a</xref>), supplemented with 15&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of glycerol as the only carbon source. The medium was adjusted to pH 6.0 with 0.1M phosphate buffer. The tubes with growth medium were inoculated with a suspension of 10<sup>&#x02212;3</sup> dilution of original sludge sample, prepared in miliQ water, and incubated at 28&#x000B0;C for an initial period of 11&#x02009;days. Following three subsequent transfers (10%, v/v) in freshly prepared medium on a weekly basis, the mixed microbial community was then transferred and further enriched at the same incubation conditions for 20&#x02009;days in 40&#x02009;mL penicillin bottles using an autoclaved modified growth medium as described by Dennis et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>). Medium composition: 2&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>, 1&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 1&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> NH<sub>4</sub>Cl, 0.0147&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> CaCl<sub>2</sub>&#x000B7;2H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.1&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> MgSO<sub>4</sub>&#x000B7;7H<sub>2</sub>O and 15&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> glycerol. The medium was supplemented with 1&#x02009;mL L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of a mixed trace element solution and 1&#x02009;mL L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of a vitamin solution (Patil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2015a</xref>). During all enrichment experiments, the incubations were sampled on a weekly basis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2-2">
<title>Bioelectrochemical System Setup</title>
<p>Two independent BESs were constructed using Perspex frames. A two-compartment system (2C) with a cation exchange membrane (CEM) (Fumatech FKB, Fumasep, Germany) fixed between the cathode and anode compartments was considered as control reactor for 1,3-PDO production as previously described (Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2013</xref>). A three-compartment system (3C; Gildemyn et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2015</xref>; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>), dedicated to 1,3-PDO production and <italic>in situ</italic> organics extraction, was built with an additional AEM (Fumatech FAB, Fumasep, Germany) between the cathode and extraction compartments. Both membranes were pretreated in accordance to the specifications of the company. Acid and base pretreated carbon felt (3&#x02009;mm thick; 5&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;20&#x02009;cm exposed to the liquid; Alfa Aesar, Germany) was used as a cathode electrode with a stainless steel frame current collector. An IrOx-coated titanium mesh (5&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;20&#x02009;cm; Magneto Special Anodes BV, the Netherlands) was used as a stable anode. In the cathode compartment, an Ag/AgCl electrode (3M NaCl, 0.209&#x02009;V vs. standard hydrogen electrode; RE-1B, Biologic Science Instruments, France) was used as a reference electrode. All electrodes and membranes have a projected surface area of 100&#x02009;cm<sup>2</sup>. All reactor compartments have a working volume of 350&#x02009;mL, which includes 150&#x02009;mL of liquid volume in a closed recirculation buffer vessel of 500&#x02009;mL. The pH of the cathode was controlled with 2M NaOH and 2M HCl at pH 6.0 (Dulcometer D1Cb/D1Cc, Prominent, Netherlands).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>Three-compartment reactor (3C) concept for simultaneous bioproduction of 1,3-PDO and extraction of carboxylates from glycerol electro-fermentation</bold>. A reduction process occurs at the cathode, converting glycerol into 1,3-PDO and organic acids, whereas an oxidation process occurs at the anode, converting water into oxygen and protons. An anion exchange membrane (AEM) separates the cathode and extraction compartments, allowing the volatile fatty acids (VFA), such as propionate, to cross. A cation exchange membrane (CEM) separates the anode and extraction compartment, allowing the protons to cross, which turn propionate into propionic acid. The extraction (middle) compartment serves the purpose of recovering carboxylates as carboxylic acids.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-04-00073-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S2-3">
<title>Bioelectrochemical System Operation</title>
<p>The cathodes were inoculated with a mixed-microbial community enriched with specialized glycerol degraders. The initial concentration of intact cells was set at 4.0&#x02009;&#x000D7;&#x02009;10<sup>7</sup>&#x02009;cells mL<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> as determined by flow cytometry according to De Roy et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2012</xref>). The catholyte was a modified medium as reported by Dennis et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>). The anolyte was 0.1M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (pH 2). The medium in the extraction compartment consisted of four times concentrated inorganic catholyte medium. The catholyte, anolyte, and the extraction compartment liquids were recirculated at a rate of 3.6&#x02009;L h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> to facilitate mixing. The electrochemical experiments in both BESs were conducted galvanostatically at a fixed current density of 10&#x02009;A m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> using a VSP potentiostat (Biologic, France). The resulting cell potential was around 2.78&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;0.07&#x02009;V throughout the whole operating period. The BESs were operated in a fed-batch mode; 15&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (18.24&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) of glycerol (min 97% purity, Laborama VWR BDH Prolabo, Netherlands) was added as soon as the glycerol concentration decreased close to 0&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. The catholyte, extraction medium, and anolyte were sampled three times per week. Total gas production was determined three times a week by means of a water displacement column assembly. The relative gas composition was determined by analyzing a gas sample from the water displacement column.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2-4">
<title>Chemical Analysis</title>
<p>Organic acids and cathode gas composition were analyzed according to Patil et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2015a</xref>). Alcohols were analyzed according to Gildemyn et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2015</xref>). Samples for organic acids and alcohol analysis were stored at &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C and appropriately diluted with milliQ water before analysis. Organic acids (C1-C5) were analyzed using a 930 Compact IC Flex (Metrohm, Switzerland) ion chromatography system with inline bicarbonate removal (Metrohm CO<sub>2</sub> suppressor). Separation was done on a Metrosep organic acids (250/7.8) column at 35&#x000B0;C behind a Metrosep organic acids (4.6) guard column. The eluent was 1&#x02009;mM H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and the flow rate 0.5&#x02009;mL min<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. An 850 IC conductivity detector was used for detection of eluted components. Detection was enhanced using a chemical suppression module to replace protons with Li-cations (Metrohm suppressor module with 0.5M LiCl). The sample aspiration needle was cleaned with acetone between each analysis. The lower limit of quantification was 1&#x02009;mg L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Gildemyn et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2015</xref>). Alcohols were analyzed using gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID, Varian CP-3800 Gas Chromatograph, USA) during the enrichment phase of the study. The GC-FID has detection limit of 2.0&#x02009;mg L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> to 1000&#x02009;mg L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. During the BES experiment phase, alcohols (C1-C4) were analyzed using a 930 Compact IC Flex (Metrohm, Switzerland) ion chromatography system. Separation occurred at 35&#x000B0;C on a Metrosep Carb 2 (250/4.0) column behind a Metrosep Trap 1 100/4.0 guard column. The eluent was 20&#x02009;mM NaOH at a flow rate of 0.8&#x02009;mL min<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. An IC amperometric detector (cycle: 300&#x02009;ms 0.05V, 50&#x02009;ms 0.55&#x02009;V, 200&#x02009;ms &#x02212;0.1&#x02009;V detection during 200&#x02013;300&#x02009;ms of each cycle) was used for detection of eluted components. The sample aspiration needle was cleaned with acetone between each analysis. The lower limit of quantification was 1&#x02009;mg L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Standards and controls were regularly used for calibration of the signals (Patil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2015a</xref>). Effluent gases from reactors were analyzed on a Compact GC (Global Analyser Solutions, Breda, the Netherlands), equipped with a Molsieve 5A pre-column and Porabond column (CH<sub>4</sub>, O<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>) and a Rt-Q-bond pre-column and column (CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, and H<sub>2</sub>S). Concentrations of gases were determined by means of a thermal conductivity detector. The carrier gases were N<sub>2</sub> for H<sub>2</sub> channel and He for all other gases. The detection limit for these gases was 100&#x02009;ppmv.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2-5">
<title>Calculations</title>
<p>Coulombic efficiency (CE) and production rate per electrode surface were calculated as previously described by Patil et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2015b</xref>). Glycerol can be fermented toward hydrogen, therefore CE reported in this work are based on total charge delivered to the cathode through electrical current and glycerol. For example, the overall CE of 1,3-PDO production is calculated according to Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E1">1</xref>.</p>
<p><disp-formula id="E1"><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CE</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mtext>PDO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle scriptlevel='+1'><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>c;t</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>c;t</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>m;t</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>m;t</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>a;t</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>a;t</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>1,3PDO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mstyle scriptlevel='+1'><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>1,3PDO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle scriptlevel='+1'><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>app</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>3600</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle scriptlevel='+1'><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Gly</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>t</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x02212;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy='false'>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Gly</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>t</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>gly</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle scriptlevel='+1'><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>gly</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>100</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
with CE<sub>1,3-PDO</sub> as the overall CE of 1,3-PDO production in %, [1,3-PDO<sub>x;y</sub>] as the concentration of 1,3-PDO in g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in a certain compartment at a certain time point (time in days), <italic>V</italic><sub>x</sub> the volume of the corresponding reactor compartment in L, <italic>M</italic><sub>z</sub> the molar mass of the component in g mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, <italic>n</italic><sub>z</sub> the number of electrons contained in component z, <italic>A</italic> the area of the electrode in square metre, <italic>J</italic><sub>app</sub> the applied current density in ampere per square metre, F the faraday constant of 96485&#x02009;C mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, [Gly<sub>c;y</sub>] as the glycerol concentration in the cathode at a certain time point. This equation takes the occurrence and disappearance of 1,3-PDO in each reactor compartment into account. 1,3-PDO is an uncharged molecule and is able to diffuse along the concentration gradient over the ion exchange membranes. For glycerol, a similar consideration was made, but concentrations were negligible in the middle and anode compartment (&#x0007E;100&#x02009;mg L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and, thus, not taken into account in the calculations. The observed low diffusion of glycerol is attributed to fast consumption in the cathode and, thus, the concentration gradient was less strong as compared with the 1,3-PDO concentration gradient. CE was calculated in a similar fashion (i.e., considering an overall production from current and glycerol) for hydrogen production by taking the partial pressure and the gas flow rate into account. A separate efficiency for only current (CE<sub>j</sub>) or glycerol (CE<sub>gly</sub>) as electron donor can also be calculated by considering the other source as 0 in the denominator of Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E1">1</xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3-1">
<title>Enrichment of Specialized Glycerol Degraders</title>
<p>In this study, the microbial inoculum used for bioelectrochemical synthesis of 3-carbon compounds had been through a selection and enrichment cycle. In a first cycle, the mixed-microbial community sample from a wastewater treatment plant of an oleochemical industry was cultured at 28&#x000B0;C and pH 6.0 in minimal medium with glycerol as an only carbon source for a period of 11&#x02009;days. Mainly 1,3-PDO (0.5&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and butyrate (0.3&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) were produced but glycerol was not entirely consumed (0.6&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) during this cycle (Transfer 0; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>A). The headspace was dominated by nitrogen (54.2%) and hydrogen (17.8%), in this first cycle, and stayed constant throughout the whole enrichment procedure. Consumed glycerol mainly ended-up in microbial biomass production as dense bacterial growth (visual observation of turbidity) was observed after 11&#x02009;days of incubation. Following a first transfer (Transfer 1; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>A), microbial growth was still high, but within the same period of time (11&#x02009;days), 1,3-PDO (9.0&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) as well as butyrate (7.7&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) concentrations were considerably higher. However glycerol (2.2&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) was still detected after 11&#x02009;days. It was only after a second subsequent transfer (Transfer 2; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>A) into fresh growth medium that glycerol was removed for 98% (0.3&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), which coincided with a high 1,3-PDO concentration (13.0&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and a lower butyrate production (3.0&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) compared with the previous transfer. A third and last transfer into fresh growth medium did not improve glycerol degradation any further; a decrease in 1,3-PDO (8.6&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and a slight increase in butyrate (3.7&#x02009;g L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) production were detected (Transfer 3; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>A). Additionally, CH<sub>4</sub> was never detected during the entire enrichment procedure.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>Enrichment of glycerol degraders at 28&#x000B0;C, pH 6.0 in anaerobic conditions, through three consecutives cycles (highlighted, here, by transfer 1, 2, and 3) of 11&#x02009;days in 10&#x02009;mL medium in Balch tubes (A), in 40&#x02009;mL medium in penicillin bottles for 20&#x02009;days (B) using HA medium or modified Dennis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref> medium for 12&#x02009;days (C)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-04-00073-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Following this pre-enrichment of glycerol degraders, a similar enrichment procedure was performed using a larger volume of medium (40&#x02009;mL) for 20&#x02009;days. After 8&#x02009;days of incubation, glycerol was mainly converted into 1,3-PDO (7.1&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and butyrate (3.1&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>). No further conversions occurred as the titers remained constant (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>B).</p>
<p>The enriched mixed-microbial community was then transferred into modified medium from Dennis et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>) to acclimate the community to the BES medium for a period of 12&#x02009;days. After 7&#x02009;days of incubation, a large fraction of glycerol (15.8&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) was consumed and 1,3-PDO production reached up to 8.2&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> and butyrate to 3.8&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>C).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3-2">
<title>Enhanced Glycerol Recovery into 3-Carbon Compounds in BESs</title>
<p>In both reactors, headspace gas composition was very similar to each other (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). Hydrogen gas dominated the headspace of the reactors in the range of 60&#x02013;88%, with the remainder being N<sub>2</sub> (10&#x02013;38%) and CO<sub>2</sub> (0.1&#x02013;4.3%). No methane was detected in the 2C and the 3C reactors, indicating successful inhibition of the methanogenic microbial community during the enrichment phase. The hydrogen production rate was 2.8&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;0.6&#x02009;L m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x02009;day<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for 2C and 2.7&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;0.7&#x02009;L m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>day<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> for 3C which corresponds to an overall CE for H<sub>2</sub> production of 16.7&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;6.2% for 2C and 14.6&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;4.6% for 3C (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E1">1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>Gas composition of the cathode as determined from the headspace of a water displacement column in 2C (-) and 3C (- -) bioelectrochemical systems</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-04-00073-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In both reactors, operated under the same conditions, 1,3-PDO reached similar and high titers, production rates, and CE (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="E1">1</xref>). After 13&#x02009;days, 49.5&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of 1,3-PDO (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>C; produced at 33.2% CE and 380.5&#x02009;g COD m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x02009;day<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>; per unit projected surface area of electrode) with a yield of 0.72&#x02009;mol<sub>1,3-PDO</sub> mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup><sub>glycerol</sub> was detected in the 2C bioelectrochemical reactor. During the same period, 50.8&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> 1,3-PDO (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>A; produced at 34.1% CE and 391.0&#x02009;g COD m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>&#x02009;day<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) with a production yield of 0.71&#x02009;mol<sub>1,3-PDO</sub> mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup><sub>glycerol</sub> was detected in the 3C bioelectrochemical reactor. A very low concentration of 1,3-PDO (0.1&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) and no glycerol were measured during this time in the extraction compartment medium of the 3C reactor, showing that the AEM is impervious to glycerol. From day 15, glycerol started to accumulate in the cathode compartment of both reactors and 1,3-PDO synthesis slowed down.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p><bold>Glycerol, alcohols, and VFA concentration in the cathodic compartment of a 3C (A) and 2C (C) BESs</bold>. VFA and alcohol concentration in the extraction medium of a 3C BES <bold>(B)</bold> and extraction rate of organic acids in a 3C BES <bold>(D)</bold>.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fbioe-04-00073-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At day 13, oxidative products from glycerol electro-fermentation were dominated by propionate with 4.3 and 9.6&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (6.2&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in catholyte and 3.4&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in extraction compartment; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>B), respectively, in 2C and 3C reactors. These values represent 31.8 and 47.8%, respectively, of total volatile fatty acids (VFA) present in 2C and 3C reactors. Propionate production in both reactor configurations was rather high compared with what was previously obtained during the enrichment phase of this study. In the 2C reactor, butyrate concentration reached a maximum of 5.8&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> after 18&#x02009;days of incubation, in accordance with the maximum titers previously obtained during the enrichment phase. During the same period, in the 3C reactor, the total titer of butyrate was much lower, 3.4&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (1.7&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in catholyte and 1.7&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in extraction compartment; Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>B).</p>
<p>From day 11 to day 29 (end of experiment), a considerable increase of organic acids was detected in the extraction compartment with the main component being propionic acid, which increased in concentration from 3.4 to 13.1&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in the extraction compartment of the 3C reactor (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>B). After 29&#x02009;days, propionate had been extracted at a rate of 162&#x02009;g m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>h<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>D). During this period, propionate was found to accumulate from 4.3 to 9.5&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in the 2C reactor (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>C), whereas its concentration was constant around 4.8&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;0.4&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;6) in catholyte of the 3C reactor (Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>A). The concentration of total VFA (lactate, formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate) increased from 11.4 to a maximum of 26.6&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in catholyte of the 2C reactor, while it stabilized to 12.7&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;0.8&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;6) in catholyte of the 3C reactor. At day 29, 9.5 and 17.7&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of propionate (from which 13.4&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> was measured in extraction medium) was measured in the 2C and 3C reactor, respectively. After 29&#x02009;days, based on VFA considered/detected in the study, the total VFA was extracted with an efficiency of 34.2%. Throughout this period, the concentration of 1,3-PDO remained constant in the 3C reactor, from 51.3 (mainly present in catholyte) to 52.5&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (47.4&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in catholyte and 5.1&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> in extraction compartment), representing 58.7&#x02009;&#x000B1;&#x02009;0.1% (<italic>n</italic>&#x02009;&#x0003D;&#x02009;6) of total COD in the catholyte and middle compartment. In contrast, the 1,3-PDO concentration dropped from 49.5&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (77.7% of total COD) to 38.5&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (34.2% of total COD) in the 2C reactor.</p>
<p>From day 18 until the end of the experiment, glycerol started to accumulate in the catholyte of both systems. Nevertheless, 25.7 and 46.4&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> of glycerol was still consumed or degraded in the 2C and 3C reactor, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In this study, the use of a selected mixed-microbial community, enriched for glycerol consumers, allowed further increase in 1,3-PDO concentrations. Previous work has shown that selective enrichment of a stable performing community was beneficial for instant start-up of a microbial electrosynthesis process and reproducible bioproduction profiles (Patil et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2015a</xref>).</p>
<p>The enrichment procedure for glycerol degraders shows that, after a week of incubation in HA or modified Dennis et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>) medium, mainly 1,3-PDO and butyrate were produced from glycerol degradation. Removal rates for glycerol were similar between the two media (1.8 vs. 1.9&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>day<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>). Production rates for 1,3-PDO were slightly higher in HA medium (4.3 vs. 3.1&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>day<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), while butyrate production rates were similar between the two media (0.5 vs. 0.4&#x02009;g COD L<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>day<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>). In this case, a decline of microbial diversity due to enrichment does not seem to impact the resilience of the key microbial functional groups responsible for conversion of glycerol into 1,3-PDO and butyrate as previously demonstrated (Wertz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2007</xref>).</p>
<p>In both BES, the observed production yields are equal or slightly below the maximum theoretical yields as defined by Zeng (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1996</xref>); calculated considering fermentation (without hydrogen addition) of glycerol into 1,3-PDO by pure culture of <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic>. These yields are close to the maximum yield obtained so far with minimal growth medium containing crude glycerol in mixed-culture fermentation (0.76&#x02009;mol<sub>1,3-PDO</sub> mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup><sub>glycerol</sub>; Dietz and Zeng, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2014</xref>) and much higher than the maximal yield reported so far by electro-fermentation (0.57&#x02009;mol<sub>1,3-PDO</sub> mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup><sub>glycerol</sub>; Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Modification of a BES by addition of an extraction compartment clearly showed a direct impact on glycerol oxidation profiles. The extraction compartment enhances propionate production at the expense of butyrate production. Substantial propionate production from glycerol fermentation has been reported earlier in a BES under several conditions: (1) operation for a period longer than 2&#x02009;weeks (Dennis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2013</xref>), (2) with low current density (1&#x02009;A m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>; Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2015</xref>), (3) in case of a BES operated with a variable cathode potential (&#x02212;0.80&#x02009;V to &#x02212;1.10&#x02009;V), and (4) when electric potential was not sufficient for current production from the start of the experiment (Xafenias et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2015</xref>).</p>
<p>The observed high VFA concentrations, as reported here in catholyte of the 2C reactor, are well known to inhibit anaerobic digestion process (Hanaki et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1981</xref>), methanogenesis (Koster and Cramer, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">1987</xref>), or alcoholic fermentation (Lafon-Lafourcade et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1984</xref>). Inhibition of methanogenesis and alcoholic fermentation are in this case beneficial processes as this allows to recover as much VFA through extraction as possible.</p>
<p>As a future perspective, we propose to operate a system like the 3C BES, with a residence time of less than 18&#x02009;days to achieve full removal of glycerol and conversion into 1,3-PDO in the catholyte and to propionic acid in the middle compartment. A residence time below 18&#x02009;days would lead to low 1,3-PDO diffusion to the middle compartment. The middle extraction compartment can be operated in a batch or as a continuous system. A batch mode operation allows to harvest and recover VFA concentrated from the middle compartment, for example by means of esterification as described in Andersen et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2016</xref>). Alternatively, the use of the <italic>in situ</italic>-produced 1,3-PDO as the alcohol to drive the esterification can be explored. Another method for recovery of the VFA from the middle compartment can be by means of membrane liquid&#x02013;liquid extraction (Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The results obtained during glycerol fermentation in the cathode of BESs confirmed that a high current density (10&#x02009;A m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup>) combined with a selectively enriched glycerol-degrading community and <italic>in situ</italic> organics extraction in a modified BES setup allowed to recover 1,3-PDO together with propionic acid from glycerol. An additional benefit of the 3C over the 2C reactor system is the limited organic acid accumulation in the fermentation broth. Separation of the 1,3-PDO from the carboxylates allows for easier downstream processing with the added benefit that the carboxylates can be recovered as their acids from the middle compartment. In this particular case, the acids contained 57.9% of propionic acid.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>JA and KR conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript. HR and CA performed the enrichment of glycerol-degrading mixed-microbial communities, constructed and operated the bioelectrochemical systems, and did chemical analysis. HR and JA wrote the manuscript. SP participated in the design of the study and review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>Authors thank Oleon Biodiesel industry located in Ertvelde, in the port of Ghent, Belgium for providing them access to their wastewater treatment plant and for permitting to sample activated sludge. We thank Dr. Antonin Pr&#x000E9;voteau and Sylvia Gildemyn for technical assistance on bioelectrochemical systems.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="S8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>SP acknowledges the support from European Commission <italic>via</italic> MSCA&#x02019;s Individual European Fellowship (Grant No. PIEF-GA-2012-326869). SP, KR, HR, and JA were supported by the European Research Council <italic>via</italic> Starter Grant &#x0201C;ELECTROTALK&#x0201D;. Equipment used was supported <italic>via</italic> &#x0201C;BOF Basisinfrastructuur 01B05912.&#x0201D;</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berton</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naert</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gildemyn</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rabaey</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stevens</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Extraction and esterification of low-titre short chain volatile fatty acids from anaerobic fermentation with ionic liquids</article-title>. <source>ChemSusChem</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>2059</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2063</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cssc.201600473</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hennebel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gildemyn</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Coma</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Desloover</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berton</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Electrolytic membrane extraction enables production of fine chemicals from biorefinery sidestreams</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>7135</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7142</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/es500483w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24844669</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Arends</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verstraete</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>100 years of microbial electricity production: three concepts for the future</article-title>. <source>Microb. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>333</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>346</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00302.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21958308</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="book"><collab>BP Statistical Review of World Energy</collab>. (<year>2016</year>). <source>Renewable Energy</source>, <edition>65th Edn</edition>, <publisher-loc>BP p.l.c., London</publisher-loc>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clomburg</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a platform for renewable fuels and chemicals</article-title>. <source>Trends Biotechnol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>20</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>28</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.10.006</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23178075</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Roy</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clement</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thas</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boon</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Flow cytometry for fast microbial community fingerprinting</article-title>. <source>Water Res.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>907</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>919</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.076</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22192760</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dennis</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harnisch</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yeoh</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tyson</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rabaey</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of cathode-associated microbial communities and metabolite profiles in a glycerol-fed bioelectrochemical system</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>4008</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4014</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00569-13</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23603684</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dietz</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Efficient production of 1, 3-propanediol from fermentation of crude glycerol with mixed cultures in a simple medium</article-title>. <source>Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>225</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>233</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00449-013-0989-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23749235</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Use of oxidoreduction potential as an indicator to regulate 1, 3-propanediol fermentation by <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>554</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>563</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-005-0001-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16021488</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gildemyn</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verbeeck</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Slabbinck</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pr&#x000E9;voteau</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rabaey</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Integrated production, extraction, and concentration of acetic acid from CO<sub>2</sub> through microbial electrosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>328</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.estlett.5b00212</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hanaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsuo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagase</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Mechanism of inhibition caused by long-chain fatty acids in anaerobic digestion process</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Bioeng.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>1591</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1610</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bit.260230717</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kerckhof</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Courtens</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geirnaert</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoefman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vilchez-Vargas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Optimized cryopreservation of mixed microbial communities for conserved functionality and diversity</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e99517</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0099517</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24937032</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koster</surname> <given-names>I. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cramer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Inhibition of methanogenesis from acetate in granular sludge by long-chain fatty acids</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>403</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>409</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16347288</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lafon-Lafourcade</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geneix</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rib&#x000E9;reau-Gayon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Inhibition of alcoholic fermentation of grape must by fatty acids produced by yeasts and their elimination by yeast ghosts</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>1246</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1249</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16346561</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lesnik</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Microbial conversion of waste glycerol from biodiesel production into value-added products</article-title>. <source>Energies</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>4739</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4768</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/en6094739</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marshall</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ross</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fichot</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Norman</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>May</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Electrosynthesis of commodity chemicals by an autotrophic microbial community</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>8412</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8420</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02401-12</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23001672</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mattam</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clomburg</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yazdani</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Fermentation of glycerol and production of valuable chemical and biofuel molecules</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Lett.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>831</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>842</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10529-013-1240-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23690047</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Moscoviz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Trably</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernet</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Consistent 1, 3-propanediol production from glycerol in mixed culture fermentation over a wide range of pH</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Biofuels</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13068-016-0447-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26855671</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patil</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arends</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanwonterghem</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Meerbergen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tyson</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group> (<year>2015a</year>). <article-title>Selective enrichment establishes a stable performing community for microbial electrosynthesis of acetate from CO<sub>2</sub></article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>8833</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>8843</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/es506149d</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Patil</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gildemyn</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pant</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zengler</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Logan</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rabaey</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015b</year>). <article-title>A logical data representation framework for electricity-driven bioproduction processes</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Adv.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>736</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>744</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.03.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Microbial conversion of glycerol to 1, 3-propanediol by an engineered strain of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>1628</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1634</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02376-08</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19139229</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wertz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Degrange</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prosser</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poly</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Commeaux</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guillaumaud</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Decline of soil microbial diversity does not influence the resistance and resilience of key soil microbial functional groups following a model disturbance</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>2211</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2219</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01335.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17686019</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xafenias</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anunobi</surname> <given-names>M. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mapelli</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Electrochemical startup increases 1, 3-propanediol titers in mixed-culture glycerol fermentations</article-title>. <source>Process Biochem.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>1499</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1508</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.procbio.2015.06.020</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guzman</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rabaey</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Angenent</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>In-line and selective phase separation of medium-chain carboxylic acids using membrane electrolysis</article-title>. <source>Chem. Commun.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>6847</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6850</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/c5cc01897h</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25792085</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hanna</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Value-added uses for crude glycerol &#x02013; a byproduct of biodiesel production</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Biofuels</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1754-6834-5-13</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Pathway and kinetic analysis of 1, 3-propanediol production from glycerol fermentation by <italic>Clostridium butyricum</italic></article-title>. <source>Bioprocess Eng.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>169</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>175</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01464731</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freguia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rabaey</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Carbon and electron fluxes during the electricity driven 1, 3-propanediol biosynthesis from glycerol</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>11199</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>11205</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/es402132r</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23947779</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freguia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dennis</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rabaey</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Development of bioelectrocatalytic activity stimulates mixed-culture reduction of glycerol in a bioelectrochemical system</article-title>. <source>Microb. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>483</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>489</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1751-7915.12240</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>