<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Astron. Space Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Astron. Space Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-987X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1100472</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fspas.2022.1100472</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Astronomy and Space Sciences</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Oblique propagation and temperature effects on the resonant right-hand ion beam instability</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Le et&#xa0;al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.1100472">10.3389/fspas.2022.1100472</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Le</surname>
<given-names>Ari</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1908065/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Li-Jen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wetherton</surname>
<given-names>Blake</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2102189/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Keenan</surname>
<given-names>Brett</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stanier</surname>
<given-names>Adam</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Los Alamos National Laboratory</institution>, <addr-line>Los Alamos</addr-line>, <addr-line>NM</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Goddard Space Flight Center</institution>, <institution>National Aeronautics and Space Administration</institution>, <addr-line>Greenbelt</addr-line>, <addr-line>MD</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/930143/overview">Charles William Smith</ext-link>, University of New Hampshire, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/892667/overview">Daniel Verscharen</ext-link>, University College London, United Kingdom</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1796330/overview">Mourad Djebli</ext-link>, USTHB, Algeria</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Ari Le, <email>arile@lanl.gov</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Space Physics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>1100472</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>16</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>21</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Le, Chen, Wetherton, Keenan and Stanier.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Le, Chen, Wetherton, Keenan and Stanier</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The resonant right-hand instability (RHI) is often the dominant mode driven by reflected ions upstream of Earth&#x2019;s quasi-parallel bow shock. In the tradition of Peter Gary, this paper further explores the right-hand instability using numerical solutions of the plasma dispersion relation and non-linear kinetic simulations, with parameters inspired by observations from NASA&#x2019;s Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission. Agreement is found between the ion distributions in the particle-in-cell simulations and Magnetospheric Multiscale spacecraft data, which show the gyrophase bunching characteristic of the instability. The non-linear structures created by right-hand instability tend to be stronger when the plasma beta is lower. These structures have sizes of around 100 to 200 ion inertial lengths perpendicular to the magnetic field, presenting planet-sized disturbances to the magnetosphere. 2d and 3D hybrid particle-in-cell simulations show that modes with a range of propagation angles oblique to the magnetic field are excited, providing a ground to understand previous statistical studies of observed foreshock waves.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>foreshock</kwd>
<kwd>instability</kwd>
<kwd>oblique</kwd>
<kwd>electromagnetic</kwd>
<kwd>ions</kwd>
<kwd>bow shock</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>At Earth&#x2019;s bow shock, like at other collisionless shocks, ions reflected back upstream may form a beam population in velocity space. The free energy of this backstreaming ion beam drives a range of kinetic instabilities in the foreshock. For relatively tenuous and fast (compared to the background Alfven speed) ion beams traveling parallel to the magnetic field, the fastest growing linear instability is the resonant right-hand instability (RHI) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gary,&#xa0;1991</xref>). For low beam densities, this mode is a low-frequency wave carried by the background and excited by a cyclotron resonance with the beam ions. As described in another article in this collection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Winske and Wilson,&#xa0;2022</xref>), Peter Gary was a pioneer in the Vlasov theory of electromagnetic ion beam instabilities in space plasmas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gary&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gary&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gary,&#xa0;1991</xref>). Gary&#x2019;s work is an important piece of a large body of research on the theory and observation of RHI waves in the foreshock. Here, we re-examine properties and dynamics of the RHI using a modern hybrid particle-in-cell (PIC) code and example data from NASA&#x2019;s Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) mission. The hybrid PIC simulations show that a finite temperature of the background decreases the amplitude of non-linear structures that develop and that a relatively broadband spectrum of modes may be excited with a range of propagation angles oblique to the local magnetic field.</p>
<p>Many early studies of RHI were inspired by data from the International Sun-Earth Explorer (ISEE) spacecraft. The data showed abundant wave activity in the foreshock, and it was recognized that RHI and other low-freqency modes were associated with backstreaming ions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hoppe&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1981</xref>). Some effects of these waves include modifying the transport and heating of ions in the upstream plasma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lee,&#xa0;1982</xref>). The RHI in particular may also drive ultra-low frequency (ULF) waves in the 30-s period range (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Watanabe and Terasawa,&#xa0;1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Greenstadt&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1995</xref>), which couple to particles trapped in Earth&#x2019;s radiation belts. The non-linear evolution of RHI was found to be a possible driver of large-amplitude magnetic pulsations observed in the forshock (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Akimoto&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1993</xref>). More recent simulation studies of RHI have focused on the global context of (ULF) waves and their transport into the magnetosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Blanco-Cano&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Palmroth&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kajdi&#x10d;&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Turc&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2022</xref>). In addition, very high-resolution field and particle data are now available from NASA&#x2019;s MMS mission (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Burch&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2016</xref>). Meanwhile, laser-driven laboratory experiments have offered a means of taking detailed measurements of ion beam instabilities in a reproducible environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Heuer&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Here, we revisit RHI with a hybrid PIC code to further explore the waves and non-linear structures associated with the instability. Because earlier work focused on moderately cool beams with <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>thb</italic>
</sub> &#x2272; <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hoshino and Terasawa,&#xa0;1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Winske and Gary,&#xa0;1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Akimoto&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1993</xref>) we also consider the effects of warmer beam and background ion populations. The finite temperatures moderately reduce the RHI growth rate, and they tend to reduce the amplitude of non-linear structures. We also explore the spectrum of oblique waves excited by a parallel ion beam. A statistical analysis of Cluster spacecraft data uptream of the quasi-parallel bow shock showed that the beam-driven waves have a power spectrum peaked at oblique propagation angles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eastwood&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2005</xref>). This is at first glance at odds with the fact that the fastest growing mode for the beam and plasma conditions is the purely parallel propagating RHI. We find a range of oblique modes are excited in 2D and 3D simulations, consistent with solutions of the hot plasma dispersion relation. The simulations predict a typical perpendicular scale length of the non-linear RHI structures to be <inline-formula id="inf1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to 200 <italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub>, indicating that the structures are planet-sized and may significantly impact the magnetosphere.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>2 Review of the resonant ion beam instability</title>
<p>In this section, we include a brief review of the resonant right-hand instability (RHI) and define the conventions we use in our analysis. The RHI is a solution of the dispersion relation for magnetized plasmas with a beam ion population traveling along the magnetic field. For the cases of interest here, the fastest growing mode is purely parallel propagating. For purely parallel modes, the relevant dispersion relation for a plasma where each species <italic>j</italic> has an isotropic Maxwellian velocity distribution is (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gary&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1984</xref>):<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m2">
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:munder>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munder>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:math>
<label>(1)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e2">
<mml:math id="m3">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">thj</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
<label>(2)</label>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="e3">
<mml:math id="m4">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b6;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfenced open="(" close=")">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfenced>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">thj</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
<label>(3)</label>
</disp-formula>where <italic>k</italic> is the parallel wavenumber, <inline-formula id="inf2">
<mml:math id="m5">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c9;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3f5;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula id="inf3">
<mml:math id="m6">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">thj</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <italic>u</italic>
<sub>
<italic>j</italic>
</sub> is the bulk fluid drift velocity, and <italic>Z</italic>(<italic>x</italic>) is the plasma dispersion function. In the quasi-neutral cold plasma limit, this results in a polynomial relation <italic>D</italic>(<italic>&#x3c9;</italic>, <italic>k</italic>) &#x3d; 0 that yields four distinct unstable modes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Weidl&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2019</xref>) including the RHI.</p>
<p>To study the linear growth rates of the RHI for oblique propagation including finite beam and background ion temperatures, we consider numerical solutions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Montgomery&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1975</xref>) of the full hot plasma dispersion relation assuming drifting Maxwellian ion distributions (see, for example the appendix of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gary,&#xa0;1991</xref>). We use the open-source New Hampshire Dispersion Solver (NHDS) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Verscharen and Chandran,&#xa0;2018</xref>). We work in the rest frame of the background plasma, where the background ions have no net drift. The background plasma is taken to be uniform and consisting of ions of mass <italic>m</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> and unit charge. We denote the background density <italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub> and the temperature <italic>T</italic>
<sub>0</sub>. The background magnetic field is also uniform, in the positive <italic>x</italic> direction, and of strength <italic>B</italic>
<sub>0</sub>. A drifting Maxwellian ion beam population is included with a density <italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>, temperature <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>, and a drift speed <italic>u</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub> in the positive <italic>x</italic> direction. The Alfven Mach number of the beam is <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; <italic>u</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>/<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>, were we normalize the drift speed to the background Alfven speed <inline-formula id="inf4">
<mml:math id="m7">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. For simplicity, we take beam ions to be the same species as the background ions. The electron population is charge- and current-neutralizing.</p>
<p>At Earth&#x2019;s bow shock, the reflected ion population is characteristically low-density (with relative beam fractions less than a few percent) and fast (with Alfven Mach numbers <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3e; 2). Under these conditions, the low-frequency wave spectrum is dominated by the RHI. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#xa0;3</xref> shows the maximum growth rate of the RHI over a range of propagation angles for a beam of density <italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>/<italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub> &#x3d; .015 and an Alfven Mach number of <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 10, similar to typical parameters at Earth&#x2019;s foreshock. The three curves show the growth rates for three different beam temperatures. The uppermost curve is a relatively cold beam, and the peak growth rate for parallel propagation agrees with the large <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> approximation for cold plasmas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gary,&#xa0;1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Weidl&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2019</xref>), <inline-formula id="inf5">
<mml:math id="m8">
<mml:mi>&#x3b3;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&#x3a9;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. When finite temperature effects are included, the growth rate decreases as the beam temperature increases. This is because a smaller fraction of the beam is gyroresonant with the mode. The background temperature has a very minor effect on the growth rates as long as the background thermal speed is relatively low (<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>th0</italic>
</sub> &#x226a; <italic>u</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>) as is typically observed at Earth&#x2019;s foreshock. We note that while additional beam-driven modes, including oblique Alfven modes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Daughton and Gary.&#xa0;(1998)</xref> and the non-resonant mode (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gary.&#xa0;(1991)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.&#xa0;(2022)</xref>, exist over this range, the RHI is dominant for the relatively fast (<italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3e; 2) and tenuous beams that we consider here. In <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s3">Section&#xa0;3</xref>, we explore the non-linear development of the purely parallel-propagating RHI using a hybrid PIC code.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>3 1D hybrid simulation and example event</title>
<p>We begin this section with an example of foreshock waves driven by reflected ions observed by NASA&#x2019;s MMS mission (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Burch&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2016</xref>). The MMS data are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#xa0;1</xref>, showing a fairly typical foreshock crossing in an interval upstream of the quasi-parallel bow shock on 30 January 2019. The magnetic field components in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#xa0;1A</xref> show a background field dominated by the radial <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> component along with large-amplitude wave fields (mainly <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> and <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>). The wave power is peaked near the local ion cyclotron frequency <inline-formula id="inf6">
<mml:math id="m9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn>
<mml:mspace width="0.3333em" class="nbsp"/>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. In the spacecraft frame, the bulk solar wind velocity is <italic>u</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> &#x223c; &#x2212;300&#xa0;<italic>km</italic>/<italic>s</italic> &#x223c; &#x2212;10 <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>, and the reflected ions appear as a more diffuse population centered near <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> &#x223c; 0 (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#xa0;1C</xref>). The approximate relative density of the reflected population is <italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>/<italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub> &#x2272; .05, and the relative parallel drift of the beam gives an Alven Mach number of <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x223c; 10. These rough parameters, which are fairly typical of Earth&#x2019;s foreshock, serve as the basis for the numerical simulations below.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Example of RHI waves typical of the quasi-parallel foreshock as observed by the MMS2 spacecraft. The magnetic field in <bold>(A)</bold> is primarily in the <italic>x</italic> direction with large-amplitude waves in <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> and <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>. The total ion density it plotted in <bold>(B)</bold>. The reduced ion velocity distribution in terms of <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> is plotted in <bold>(C)</bold>. In the spacecraft frame, the background moves in the &#x2212;<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> direction while the beam population is centered near <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 0. The reflected beam ions have a relatively broad velocity spread compared to the colder solar wind population.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fspas-09-1100472-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Because the electrons are far from resonance with the RHI and the mode frequencies are well below the electron plasma and cyclotron frequencies, hybrid numerical codes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lipatov,&#xa0;2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Winske&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2003</xref>) that treat the ions as a kinetic species and the electrons as a massless neutralizing background are suitable for studying the linear and non-linear evolution of the RHI. Here, we use a hybrid version of the particle-in-cell (PIC) code VPIC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bowers&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Le&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Keenan&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2022</xref>) to model the RHI. Numerous earlier studies of ion streaming instabilities have used similar electromagnetic hybrid PIC codes (e.g.,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Winske and Quest.,&#xa0;1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hada&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gary and Winske,&#xa0;1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Winske and Omidi,&#xa0;1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Akimoto&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dubouloz and Scholer,&#xa0;1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hellinger and Mangeney,&#xa0;1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Wang and Lin,&#xa0;2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Heuer&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Weidl&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Holcomb and Spitkovsky,&#xa0;2019</xref>). Because the simulations in this section are 1D in the <italic>x</italic> direction, they only allow the growth of the purely parallel propagating modes, which are the fastest growing modes for the parameters we use. Note that for 2D or 3D systems with oblique modes, damping on the electrons can become more important. While this effect is included in the linear dispersion solver, it is not captured by the fluid model of the hybrid code.</p>
<p>As in other hybrid PIC codes, the electron model in Hybrid-VPIC takes the form of an Ohm&#x2019;s law for the electric field:<disp-formula id="e4">
<mml:math id="m10">
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">E</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">u</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>&#x2207;</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">J</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">B</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3b7;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">J</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x2207;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">J</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
<label>(4)</label>
</disp-formula>where quasi-neutrality imposes <italic>n</italic> &#x3d; <italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>e</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; &#x2211;<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub>
<italic>Z</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub>
<italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub> (including a sum over species <italic>s</italic> of ions), the velocity <italic>u</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> is the charge-weighted ion flow u<sub>i</sub> &#x3d; &#x2211;<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub>
<italic>Z</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub>
<italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>s</italic>
</sub>
<bold>u</bold>
<sub>
<bold>s</bold>
</sub>/<italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>e</italic>
</sub>, and the current density is taken in the low-frequency approximation as <italic>&#x3bc;</italic>
<sub>0</sub>
<bold>J</bold> &#x3d; &#x2207; &#xd7; <bold>B</bold>. We use a system of units based on the background magnetic field <italic>B</italic>
<sub>0</sub> and ion density <italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub>, with times normalized by the cyclotron frequency <italic>&#x3c9;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; <italic>eB</italic>
<sub>0</sub>/<italic>m</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> and lengths given in terms of the ion inertial length <inline-formula id="inf7">
<mml:math id="m11">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3f5;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Because we use particle shapes that are sums of quadratics in each direction, we choose grid resolutions with &#x394;<italic>x</italic> ranging from .25 to 1 <italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> to avoid an unphysical numerical dispersion that occurs when low spatial resolution and high-order particle shapes are used in hybrid PIC codes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Stanier&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2020</xref>). For these 1D simulations, we include 2000 particles per cell for each ion population. The normalized resistivity <italic>&#x3b7;</italic>/(<italic>B</italic>
<sub>0</sub>/<italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub>) and hyper-resistivity <inline-formula id="inf8">
<mml:math id="m12">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b7;</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are set to small values in the range of 1 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2013;4</sup> to 5 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2013;3</sup>. For the simulations here, the electron pressure follows a simple isothermal closure, such that the electron pressure is given by <italic>p</italic>
<sub>
<italic>e</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; <italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>e</italic>
</sub>
<italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>e</italic>
</sub>, with <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>e</italic>
</sub> a constant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Le&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2016</xref>). Test simulations with an adiabatic electron closure showed no discernible differences.</p>
<p>As described in <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s2">Section&#xa0;2</xref>, our 1D simulations contain a uniform background plasma of density <italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub> and temperature <italic>T</italic>
<sub>0</sub> (we set <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>e</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; <italic>T</italic>
<sub>0</sub>) and magnetic field <italic>B</italic>
<sub>0</sub> in the <italic>x</italic> direction. To this is added a streaming population of beam ions of density <italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub> (recall an equal number density of electrons is implicit in the quasi-neutral assumption of the hybrid code), drift velocity in the positive <italic>x</italic> direction <italic>u</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>, and temperature <italic>T</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#xa0;2</xref> shows typical results from an RHI simulation with relatively cold background and beam populations. The three sets of panels in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#xa0;2</xref> are at three different times over the course of simulation.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Results from 1D hybrid simulations of the resonant right-hand instability (RHI) with cold (<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>thi</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>thb</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 0.1<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>) ion populations. The left panels are at early time <italic>t&#x3c9;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 30, middle panels are at <italic>t&#x3c9;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 64, and right panels are at <italic>t&#x3c9;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 100. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> Background (red) and beam (black) ion density profiles and magnetic field strength (blue). <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> Wave magnetic field components <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> and <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>. <bold>(G&#x2013;I)</bold> Parallel <italic>x</italic>&#x2212;<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> phase space distribution of the ions, showing the dense background at <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> &#x223c; 0 and the beam with an Alfven Mach number of <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 10. <bold>(J&#x2013;R)</bold> Beam ion distributions in the perpendicular <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub>&#x2212;<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> plane at the points marked by the vertical dashed lines in <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold>. The white lines show the direction of the perpendicular wave magnetic fields <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> and <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>, and the magenta lines show the direction of the bulk beam perpendicular velocity.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fspas-09-1100472-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The leftmost panels are at time <italic>t</italic>&#x2a;<italic>&#x3c9;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 30 when the RHI is nearing the end of a phase growth consistent with the linear instability. The background and beam density profiles as well as the total magnetic field magnitude in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#xa0;2A</xref> are relatively unperturbed. The ion phase space distribution in <italic>x</italic>&#x2212;<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> space in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#xa0;2</xref> shows a weak modulation of the beam ions (the population centered at <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> &#x223c; 10<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>). Nevertheless, the RHI is here already strong enough to modulate the beam ions in perpendicular velocity space. The three panels of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures&#xa0;2J&#x2013;L</xref> show the perpendicular velocity distribution of the beam ions in <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub>&#x2212;<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> space at the three locations marked by vertical dashed lines in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#xa0;2A</xref>. These distributions exhibit gyrophase bunching, with the beam ions undergoing motion in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field. As in previous simulations and observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hoshino and Terasawa,&#xa0;1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Thomsen&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fuselier&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gary&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1986</xref>), the gyrophase bunched ions are out of phase with the wave magnetic field. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures&#xa0;2J&#x2013;L</xref>, the white line gives the direction of the wave magnetic field (<italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> and <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>), while the black line shows the direction of the local bulk beam velocity in the <italic>y</italic>&#x2212;<italic>z</italic> plane. The field and beam velocity are roughly 90&#xb0; out of phase.</p>
<p>At later time, the RHI waves steepen into non-linear features. Non-linear structures have been observed with beam populations upstream of the bow shock, and they have been identified as shocklets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hoppe&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hada&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1987</xref>) or magnetic pulsations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Akimoto&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1993</xref>). As in the earlier simulations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Akimoto&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1993</xref>, the non-linear pulsations driven by the RHI are characterized by correlated magnetic field strength &#x7c;<italic>B</italic>&#x7c; perturbations (see the blue curve in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#xa0;2B</xref>) that are correlated with the density <italic>n</italic> perturbations (red curve).</p>
<p>Thermal velocity spreads of the background and beam ions that are not large compared to the relative drift speed do not qualitatively affect the linear properties of the RHI, though the finite temperatures moderately reduce the growth rates. The non-linear features that develop, however, are weaker in amplitude in our simulations with higher beam and background temperatures. We show example data from a simulation with a beam thermal spread <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>thb</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 3<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> and background thermal speed of <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>th0</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#xa0;3</xref>. For cold beams ions as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#xa0;2</xref>, practically all of the beam ions can become bunched where the RHI waves steepen. In addition to bunching in gyrophase angle, these resonant beam ions can be dramatically slowed down in the parallel direction, even locally coming to a stop in the background frame (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#xa0;2H</xref>). For hot beams that are more diffuse in velocity space, on the other hand, a relatively smaller fraction of the beams ions are near exact resonance with the RHI mode. As a result, a smaller fraction of the beam ions in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#xa0;3H</xref> are slowed by the wave fields. This results in a much less spiky beam ion density profile in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#xa0;3B</xref> than for the cold ions case. Furthermore, because the RHI couples to compressional modes, the higher background pressure weakens the amplitude of the non-linear features. For even higher background temperatures with <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>th0</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 4<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> (not plotted), there are no discernible pulsations or spikes in the density or magnetic field profiles.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Similar plots as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#xa0;2</xref>, but with warm background (<inline-formula id="inf9">
<mml:math id="m13">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="italic">thi</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msqrt>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> or <italic>&#x3b2;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 1) and beam (<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>thb</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 3<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>) ion populations. Again, the left panels are at early time <italic>t&#x3c9;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 30, middle panels are at <italic>t&#x3c9;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 64, and right panels are at <italic>t&#x3c9;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 100. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> Background (red) and beam (black) ion density profiles and magnetic field strength (blue). <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> Wave magnetic field components <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> and <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>. <bold>(G&#x2013;I)</bold> Parallel <italic>x</italic>&#x2212;<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> phase space distribution of the ions, showing the dense background at <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> &#x223c; 0 and the beam with an Alfven Mach number of <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 10. <bold>(J&#x2013;R)</bold> Beam ion distributions in the perpendicular <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub>&#x2212;<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> plane at the points marked by the vertical dashed lines in <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold>. The white lines show the direction of the perpendicular wave magnetic fields <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> and <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>, and the magenta lines show the direction of the bulk beam perpendicular velocity.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fspas-09-1100472-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The beam ions do display strong gyrophase bunching in perpendicular velocity space, although the non-linear structures that develop are relatively weak for the warmer beam and background temperatures (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#xa0;3</xref>). We display side-by-side in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#xa0;4</xref> ion <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> velocity distributions from the MMS event and from the Hybrid-VPIC simulation of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#xa0;3</xref>. The MMS data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#xa0;4A</xref> show the <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> distribution of ions over time, which may be taken as a proxy for distance <italic>x</italic> because the waves rapidly cross the spacecraft. A distribution in <italic>x</italic>&#x2212;<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> phase space from the hybrid PIC model is displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#xa0;3B</xref> covering a range with a similar wave phase and amplitude as the MMS data. Note that <inline-formula id="inf10">
<mml:math id="m14">
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>90</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> phase shift characteristic of the RHI between the wave fluctuations (carried by the background ions) and the gyro-bunched beam ions is visible in both the MMS data and the hybrid PIC simulation data.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Ion velocity distributions in <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>y</italic>
</sub> from <bold>(A)</bold> the MMS event displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#xa0;1</xref> in an interval starting near time 01:05 and <bold>(B)</bold> from the hybrid PIC simulation with warm beam (<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>thb</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 3<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>) and background (<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>th0</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>)) ions of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#xa0;3</xref> at <italic>t</italic> &#x3d; 40/<italic>&#x3c9;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub>. In <bold>(A)</bold>, the time <italic>t</italic> may be considered a proxy for the position <italic>x</italic> in <bold>(B)</bold> as the solar wind passes the spacecraft at the solar wind drift speed of 300&#xa0;<italic>km</italic>/<italic>s</italic> &#x223c; 10<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>. The correspondence is 50&#xa0;<italic>s</italic> &#x223c; 100 <italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fspas-09-1100472-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>4 2D and 3D hybrid simulations</title>
<p>In this section, we consider 2D and 3D hybrid simulations to study the evolution of the RHI in multiple spatial dimensions. The 2D or 3D geometry allows the development of a spectrum of modes with k vectors oblique to the magnetic field. As visible in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#xa0;5</xref>, the RHI growth rate is relatively insensitive to the propagation angle out to <inline-formula id="inf11">
<mml:math id="m15">
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>35</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. Interestingly, a statistical survey of 30-s waves observed in the Earth&#x2019;s foreshock found that the distribution of wave propagation angles was typically peaked at an oblique angle of <inline-formula id="inf12">
<mml:math id="m16">
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>20</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to the magnetic field (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eastwood&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2005</xref>). Previous hybrid simulations suggested that refraction of steepening waves driven by the fastest growing parallel propagating modes could explain the presence of oblique modes in observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dubouloz and Scholer,&#xa0;1995</xref>). On the other hand, (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Strumik&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.&#xa0;2015</xref>) studied the development of ULF waves in the foreshock of a 2D hybrid global magnetosphere model with a quasi-radial IMF and quasi-parallel bow shock. They found that averaging over the spectrum of excited RHI modes at different propagation angles gave a spectrum similar to the observations. We consider this possibility in our simplified uniform beam simulations below.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth rate of the RHI for oblique propagation as a function of the angle between the wave vector k and the background magnetic field for <italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>/<italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub> &#x3d; .015 and <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 10. Note that the growth rate is very similar for angles &#x2272;35&#xb0;. The three curves show the growth rate for different beam temperatures with thermal speeds indicated in the legend.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fspas-09-1100472-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To examine the spectrum of oblique modes, we consider a 2D simulation in the <italic>x</italic>&#x2212;<italic>z</italic> plane of a uniform beam, building on early hybrid simulation work on 2D ion-ion beam instability growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Winske and Quest,&#xa0;1986</xref>). The simulation domain is of size <italic>L</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub> &#xd7; <italic>L</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 1024 <italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> &#xd7; 1024 <italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 2048 &#xd7; 2048 cells, the background (<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>th0</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>) and beam (<italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>/<italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub> &#x3d; .02, <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 10, <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>thb</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 4.3<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>) ion populations are each sampled by 400 particles per cell, and the time step is <italic>&#x3b4;t</italic> &#x3d; .01/&#x3a9;<sub>
<italic>ci</italic>
</sub>. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#xa0;6</xref>, we compare the growth rates predicted by numerical solution of the hot plasma dispersion relation in (a) to the growth rates extracted directly from the hybrid PIC simulation in (b). The growth rate in each case is plotted in terms of the parallel (<italic>k</italic>
<sub>&#x2016;</sub> and perpendicular <italic>k</italic>
<sub>&#x22a5;</sub> wave numbers. The peak growth rate occurs for parallel propagation and corresponds to the usual RHI. Consistent with <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#xa0;5</xref>, there is a relatively broad range of oblique wave vectors with growth rates very close to the maximum. Because of this, a wide spectrum of waves with varying propagation angles is excited. The modes plotted are all almost exactly right circularly polarized. The real frequency increases by a factor of few beyond propagation angles of 40&#xb0;, and those more perpendicular modes may connect to a different wave branch.</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Growth rate computed using the NHDS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Verscharen and Chandran,&#xa0;(2018)</xref> as a function of parallel (<italic>k</italic>
<sub>&#x2016;</sub>
<italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub>) and perpendicular (<inline-formula id="inf17">
<mml:math id="m21">
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x22a5;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) normalized wave numbers for a beam of density <italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>/<italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub> &#x3d; .02, Alfven Mach number <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 10, and beam thermal speed of <italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>thb</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 3<italic>v</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub>. <bold>(B)</bold> Growth rate extracted from a 2D hybrid simulation with the same parameters as above measured by taking a time derivative of the magnetic field fluctuations.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fspas-09-1100472-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The magnetic field and density structures that develop after the RHI saturates are very similar in 2D and 3D. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#xa0;7</xref> shows comparisons of (a, c) the magnetic field component <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> and the (b, d) the plasma density between a 2D and a corresponding 3D hybrid simulation. These simulations are similar to the above simulation, but with a domain of size of <italic>L</italic> &#x3d; 512<italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 512 cells in each spatial dimension. The wide spectrum of unstable oblique modes produces magnetic fluctuations with oblique phase fronts. To quantify this effect, we show in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Figure&#xa0;8</xref> a Fourier power spectrum of the wave magnetic field component <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#xa0;7A</xref>. The symmetry of the spectrum for <bold>k</bold> going to &#x2212;<bold>k</bold> is simply a result of the Fourier transform of the real function <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>. The peak in the power spectrum is at <italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>
<italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> &#x223c; .1, corresponding to a characteristic wavelength of <inline-formula id="inf13">
<mml:math id="m17">
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>60</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. As noted by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Strumik&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2015</xref>), the fluctuation power density is spread over a range of different <bold>k</bold> vectors centered at <italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 0. Averaging over this spectrum can explain the statistics of oblique ULF waves observed by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eastwood&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2005</xref>) in Earth&#x2019;s foreshock.</p>
<fig id="F7" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison between <bold>(A, B)</bold> 2D and <bold>(C, D)</bold> 3D simulations. Left panels show <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> magnetic field component and right panels show density fluctuations in two runs with identical parameters (<italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>/<italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub> &#x3d; .02, <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 10, <italic>&#x3b2;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 1, <italic>&#x3b2;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 4.5) at a late phase after the resonant mode has saturated.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fspas-09-1100472-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F8" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 8</label>
<caption>
<p>Power spectrum &#x7c;<italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>(<italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>, <italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub>)&#x7c;<sup>2</sup> of the magnetic field plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figure&#xa0;7A</xref>. The dashed magenta lines indicate where the propagation angle is 30&#xb0; with respect to the background field <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>x</italic>
</sub>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fspas-09-1100472-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>As another way of displaying the parallel and perpendicular structure of the saturated magnetic field fluctuations, we plot cuts of the magnetic field components in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">Figure&#xa0;9</xref> along the (a, c) parallel or <italic>x</italic> direction and the (b, d) perpendicular or <italic>z</italic> direction. Again, the characteristic parallel wavelengths here are <inline-formula id="inf14">
<mml:math id="m18">
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>60</mml:mn>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. While the parallel mode (<italic>k</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 0) is fastest growing, the cuts in <italic>z</italic> show large variations in the perpendicular direction. The typical perpendicular length scales are <inline-formula id="inf15">
<mml:math id="m19">
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> to 200 <italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> and are associated with the excitation of a wide spectrum of oblique wave vectors in the original linear modes. Although not studied here, this spectrum of non-linear fluctuations in 3D can contribute to cross-field diffusion of ions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kucharek&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2000</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F9" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 9</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison between <bold>(A, B)</bold> 2D and <bold>(C, D)</bold> 3D simulations. Left panels show <italic>B</italic>
<sub>
<italic>z</italic>
</sub> magnetic field component and right panels show density fluctuations in runs with identical parameters (<italic>n</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub>/<italic>n</italic>
<sub>0</sub> &#x3d; .02, <italic>M</italic>
<sub>
<italic>A</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 10, <italic>&#x3b2;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 1, <italic>&#x3b2;</italic>
<sub>
<italic>b</italic>
</sub> &#x3d; 4.5) at a late phase after the resonant mode has saturated. The 2D and 3D simulations have similar characteristic parallel and perpendicular length scales.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fspas-09-1100472-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>5 Summary discussion</title>
<p>Using a modern hybrid PIC code, we revisited the resonant right-hand instability (RHI), which is the dominant electromagnetic ion beam instability for parallel-propagating ion beams that are relatively fast and tenuous. The parameters for the simulations were inspired by MMS observations of typical quasi-parallel foreshock fluctuations. RHI is prevalent upstream of the quasi-parallel region of Earth&#x2019;s bow shock and has been the subject of a large number of previous observational and theoretical studies, including important early works by Peter Gary (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gary&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gary&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gary&#xa0;et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gary and Winske,&#xa0;1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gary,&#xa0;1991</xref>). Here, we focused on properties of the RHI related to finite temperature effects and oblique propagation. The hybrid simulations show that warm (<italic>&#x3b2;</italic> &#x3e; 1) background and beam ion populations produce less steep non-linear features than the cold populations assumed in many previous studies. Note the RHI itself scatters reflected beam ions effectively, and it is possible that the RHI scatters an initially cooler beam into the more diffuse beam with a larger velocity spread observed by MMS. In any case, a high-beta background plasma requires additional energy to be compressed, which explains the weaker non-linear compressional features observed in simulations with high plasma beta (particularly <italic>&#x3b2;</italic> &#x226b; 1, which is not typical of the solar wind at Earth&#x2019;s foreshock).</p>
<p>Multi-dimensional (2D and 3D) hybrid simulations demonstrated that a wide spectrum of oblique modes is excited, in agreement with growth rates predicted by numerical solution of the hot plasma dispersion relation. The RHI instability growth rate is a fairly flat function of propagation angle out to <inline-formula id="inf16">
<mml:math id="m20">
<mml:mo>&#x223c;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>35</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xb0;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. The theoretical growth rates for the RHI agreed with the range of modes excited in the hybrid simulations, and the non-linear stage contained fluctuations with characteristic perpendicular length scales 2&#x2013;3 times longer than the typical parallel wavelength. At Earth&#x2019;s bow shock, typical parallel length scales would be 60<italic>d</italic>
<sub>
<italic>i</italic>
</sub>, which corresponds to .5 to 1.5 <italic>R</italic>
<sub>
<italic>E</italic>
</sub> (Earth radii) for typical solar wind densities. The corresponding perpendicular lengths scales are 2&#x2013;3 <italic>R</italic>
<sub>
<italic>E</italic>
</sub>. These non-linear structures are therefore planet-sized, and they may impact the planetary magnetopshere.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The simulation data for this study can be reproduced by running the open-source Hybrid-VPIC code branch found at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/lanl/vpic-kokkos/tree/hybridVPIC">https://github.com/lanl/vpic-kokkos/tree/hybridVPIC</ext-link>. MMS datasets are retained and available through <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://lasp.colorado.edu/mms/sdc/public/">https://lasp.colorado.edu/mms/sdc/public/</ext-link>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AL conceived the paper idea and formulated the investigation with L-JC. AL ran simulations, analyzed data, and prepared the manuscript. L-JC prepared figures of MMS data. BW ran simulations and prepared figures. BK analyzed simulation data, ran the NHDS code, and prepared figures. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the Los Alamos LDRD program and by NASA&#x2019;s Magnetospheric Multiscale Mission. Simulations used LANL Institutional Computing resources.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Akimoto</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomsen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Nonlinear evolution of electromagnetic ion beam instabilities</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>1419</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1433</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/92ja02345</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blanco-Cano</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omidi</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Russell</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Global hybrid simulations: Foreshock waves and cavitons under radial interplanetary magnetic field geometry</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>13406</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2008ja013406</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bowers</surname>
<given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albright</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergen</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwan</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Ultrahigh performance three-dimensional electromagnetic relativistic kinetic plasma simulation</article-title>. <source>Phys. Plasmas</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>055703</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.2840133</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burch</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torbert</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phan</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ergun</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Electron-scale measurements of magnetic reconnection in space</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>352</volume>, <fpage>aaf2939</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aaf2939</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halekas</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DiBraccio</surname>
<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Romanelli</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ng</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Solitary magnetic structures developed from gyro-resonance with solar wind ions at Mars and Earth</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>e2021GL097600</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2021gl097600</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Daughton</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic proton/proton instabilities in the solar wind</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>20613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20620</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/98ja01385</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dubouloz</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scholer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Two-dimensional simulations of magnetic pulsations upstream of the Earth&#x2019;s bow shock</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>9461</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9474</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/94ja03239</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eastwood</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balogh</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lucek</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mazelle</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dandouras</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Quasi-monochromatic ulf foreshock waves as observed by the four-spacecraft cluster mission: 2. Oblique propagation</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>A11220</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2004ja010618</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fuselier</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomsen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bame</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Russell</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parks</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>The phase relationship between gyrophase-bunched ions and mhd-like waves</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/gl013i001p00060</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic ion/ion instabilities and their consequences in space plasmas: A review</article-title>. <source>Space Sci. Rev.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>415</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf00196632</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Madland</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsurutani</surname>
<given-names>B. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic ion beam instabilities: Ii</article-title>. <source>Phys. fluids</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>3691</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3695</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.865101</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goldstein</surname>
<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forslund</surname>
<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic ion beam instabilities</article-title>. <source>Phys. fluids</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>1852</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1862</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.864797</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>The electromagnetic ion beam instability and energy loss of fast alpha particles</article-title>. <source>Nucl. fusion</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>334</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/0029-5515/18/3/003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomsen</surname>
<given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fuselier</surname>
<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic instabilities and gyrophase-bunched particles</article-title>. <source>Phys. fluids</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>531</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>535</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.865441</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Computer simulations of electromagnetic instabilities in the plasma sheet boundary layer</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>8085</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8094</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/ja095ia06p08085</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Greenstadt</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Le</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strangeway</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Ulf waves in the foreshock</article-title>. <source>Adv. Space Res.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0273-1177(94)00087-h</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hada</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kennel</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Terasawa</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Excitation of compressional waves and the formation of shocklets in the Earth&#x2019;s foreshock</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>4423</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4435</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/ja092ia05p04423</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hellinger</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mangeney</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic ion beam instabilities: Oblique pulsations</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>4669</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4680</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/1998ja900157</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heuer</surname>
<given-names>P. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weidl</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dorst</surname>
<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schaeffer</surname>
<given-names>D. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripathi</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vincena</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Laboratory observations of ultra-low-frequency analog waves driven by the right-hand resonant ion beam instability</article-title>. <source>Astrophysical J. Lett.</source> <volume>891</volume>, <fpage>L11</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heuer</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weidl</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dorst</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schaeffer</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bondarenko</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripathi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Observations of a field-aligned ion/ion-beam instability in a magnetized laboratory plasma</article-title>. <source>Phys. Plasmas</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>032104</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.5017637</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Holcomb</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spitkovsky</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>On the growth and saturation of the gyroresonant streaming instabilities</article-title>. <source>Astrophysical J.</source> <volume>882</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3847/1538-4357/ab328a</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoppe</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Russell</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frank</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eastman</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greenstadt</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Upstream hydromagnetic waves and their association with backstreaming ion populations: Isee 1 and 2 observations</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>4471</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4492</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/ja086ia06p04471</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoshino</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Terasawa</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Numerical study of the upstream wave excitation mechanism: 1. Nonlinear phase bunching of beam ions</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/ja090ia01p00057</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kajdi&#x10d;</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pfau-Kempf</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turc</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dimmock</surname>
<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palmroth</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takahashi</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Ulf wave transmission across collisionless shocks: 2.5 d local hybrid simulations</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>126</volume>, <fpage>e2021JA029283</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2021ja029283</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Keenan</surname>
<given-names>B. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Le</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanier</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wetherton</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cowee</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Hybrid particle-in-cell simulations of electromagnetic coupling and waves from streaming burst debris</article-title>. <source>Phys. Plasmas</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>012107</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/5.0075482</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kucharek</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scholder</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matthews</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Three-dimensional simulation of the electromagnetic ion/ion beam instability: Cross field diffusion</article-title>. <source>Nonlinear Process. Geophys.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>167</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/npg-7-167-2000</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Le</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daughton</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karimabadi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Egedal</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Hybrid simulations of magnetic reconnection with kinetic ions and fluid electron pressure anisotropy</article-title>. <source>Phys. Plasmas</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>032114</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.4943893</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Le</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanier</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daughton</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cowee</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wetherton</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Astrophysical explosions revisited: Collisionless coupling of debris to magnetized plasma</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>126</volume>, <fpage>e2021JA029125</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2021ja029125</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Coupled hydromagnetic wave excitation and ion acceleration upstream of the Earth&#x2019;s bow shock</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>5063</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5080</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/ja087ia07p05063</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lipatov</surname>
<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <source>The hybrid multiscale simulation technology: An introduction with application to astrophysical and laboratory plasmas</source>. <publisher-loc>Berlin, Germany</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer Science &#x26; Business Media</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Montgomery</surname>
<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forslund</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feldman</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1975</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic ion-beam instabilities in the solar wind</article-title>. <source>Phys. Rev. Lett.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>890</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/physrevlett.35.890.3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Palmroth</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Archer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vainio</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hietala</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pfau-Kempf</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoilijoki</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Ulf foreshock under radial imf: Themis observations and global kinetic simulation vlasiator results compared</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>8782</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8798</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2015ja021526</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stanier</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chacon</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Le</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A cancellation problem in hybrid particle-in-cell schemes due to finite particle size</article-title>. <source>J. Comput. Phys.</source> <volume>420</volume>, <fpage>109705</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109705</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Strumik</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roytershteyn</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karimabadi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stasiewicz</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grzesiak</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Przepi&#xf3;rka</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Identification of the dominant ulf wave mode and generation mechanism for obliquely propagating waves in the Earth&#x2019;s foreshock</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>5109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5116</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2015gl064915</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thomsen</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gosling</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bame</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Russell</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Gyrating ions and large-amplitude monochromatic mhd waves upstream of the Earth&#x2019;s bow shock</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>273</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/ja090ia01p00267</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Turc</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tarvus</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ala-Lahti</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Battarbee</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pfau-Kempf</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A global view of pc3 wave activity in near-Earth space: Results from hybrid-vlasov simulations</article-title>. <source>Front. Astronomy Space Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>989369</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fspas.2022.989369</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verscharen</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chandran</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Nhds: The New Hampshire dispersion relation solver</article-title>. <source>Res. Notes AAS</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3847/2515-5172/aabfe3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Generation of nonlinear alfv&#xe9;n and magnetosonic waves by beam&#x2013;plasma interaction</article-title>. <source>Phys. Plasmas</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>3528</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3538</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1063/1.1599359</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Watanabe</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Terasawa</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>On the excitation mechanism of the low-frequency upstream waves</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>6623</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6630</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/ja089ia08p06623</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weidl</surname>
<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niemann</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Three regimes and four modes for the resonant saturation of parallel ion-beam instabilities</article-title>. <source>Astrophysical J.</source> <volume>873</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3847/1538-4357/ab0462</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gary</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic instabilities driven by cool heavy ion beams</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>6825</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6832</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/ja091ia06p06825</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omidi</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic ion/ion cyclotron instability: Theory and simulations</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>14779</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14799</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/92ja00902</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quest</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic ion beam instabilities: Comparison of one-and two-dimensional simulations</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>8789</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8797</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/ja091ia08p08789</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>L. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Linear theory of electromagnetic ion beam instabilities in the Earth&#x2019;s forshock: Peter gary&#x2019;s contributions (1981&#x2013;1991)</article-title>. <source>Front. Astronomy Space Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>899642</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fspas.2022.899642</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Winske</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omidi</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karimabadi</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quest</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Hybrid simulation codes: Past, present and future&#x2014;A tutorial</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Space plasma simulation</source> (<publisher-loc>Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Spinger</publisher-name>), <fpage>136</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>165</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/3-540-36530-3_8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>