Front. Artif. Intell. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Front. Artif. Intell. 2624-8212 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/frai.2021.672279 Artificial Intelligence Correction Corrigendum: The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century McCarthy-Jones Simon * Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Edited and reviewed by: Radboud Winkels, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

 *Correspondence: Simon McCarthy-Jones s.mccarthyjones@gmail.com

This article was submitted to Technology and Law, a section of the journal Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence

 15 04 2021 2021 4 672279 25 02 2021 10 03 2021 Copyright © 2021 McCarthy-Jones. 2021 McCarthy-Jones

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century by McCarthy-Jones, S. (2019). Front. Artif. Intell. 2:19. doi: 10.3389/frai.2019.00019 human rights privacy psychology law machine learning big data

An addition has been made to the Acknowledgments. The updated Acknowledgments statement appears below:

Acknowledgments

“The author is grateful to the two reviewers of this paper, as well as Richard Mullender, Brendan Kelly, Patrick O'Callaghan, and Roseline McCarthy-Jones, for their insightful comments on this manuscript. The author would like to acknowledge Ms. Susie Alegre for introducing him to the right to freedom of thought in international law as applied to contemporary technological developments, including the work of Vermeulen (2006), Bublitz (2014), Bublitz and Merkel (2014) and Boire (2001). This framework was applied in a separate analysis in Alegre (2017).”

The author states that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

 References Alegre S. (2017). Rethinking freedom of thought for the 21st century. Eur. Hum. Rights Law Rev. 3, 221–233. Available online at: https://susiealegre.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Alegre%20from%202017_EHRLR_Issue_3_Print_final_0806%5B6745%5D.pdf Boire R. G. (2001). On cognitive liberty. J. Cogn. Libert. 2, 7–22. 10.1016/S1297-9562(01)90048-8 Bublitz J. C. (2014). Freedom of thought in the age of neuroscience. Archiv Rechts-und Sozialphilosphie 100, 1–25. Bublitz J. C. Merkel R. (2014). Crimes against minds: on mental manipulations, harms and a human right to mental self-determination. Crim. Law Philosophy 8, 51–77. 10.1007/s11572-012-9172-y Vermeulen B. (2006). Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (article 9), in Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, 4th Edn, eds van Dijk P. van Hoof F. van Rijn A. Zwaak L. (Cambridge: Intersentia Press), 751–772. 22462287