<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Anim. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Animal Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Anim. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-6225</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fanim.2025.1664380</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Genetic insights into Alpine goats raised on Lombardy&#x2019;s farms</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ferrari</surname><given-names>Carlotta</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3120184/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Punturiero</surname><given-names>Chiara</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2352388/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Delledonne</surname><given-names>Andrea</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3086916/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Milanesi</surname><given-names>Raffaella</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3282607/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bagnato</surname><given-names>Alessandro</given-names></name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/374483/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Strillacci</surname><given-names>Maria Giuseppina</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/747974/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Universit&#xe0; degli Studi di Milano</institution>, <city>Lodi</city>,&#xa0;<country country="it">Italy</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Maria Giuseppina Strillacci, <email xlink:href="mailto:maria.strillacci@unimi.it">maria.strillacci@unimi.it</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-12-03">
<day>03</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>6</volume>
<elocation-id>1664380</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>11</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>06</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>03</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Ferrari, Punturiero, Delledonne, Milanesi, Bagnato and Strillacci.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ferrari, Punturiero, Delledonne, Milanesi, Bagnato and Strillacci</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2025-11-25">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>This study investigates the genomic architecture of two Alpine dairy goat breeds, Camosciata delle Alpi (CAM) and Saanen (SAA), managed in ten herds located in Lombardy, northern Italy. Through medium-density SNP genotyping (GGP Goat 70K), we assessed population structure, genetic diversity, and Runs of Homozygosity (ROH) to evaluate the effects of breeding practices and herd-level management strategies on genetic variation. A total of 1,283 animals (CAM: 977; SAA: 306) were analyzed. Principal Component Analysis and ADMIXTURE results confirmed a clear genetic separation between the two breeds, with substantial intra-breed variation linked to herd-specific selection histories. ROH-based inbreeding coefficients (F<sub>ROH</sub>) were moderate overall (mean F<sub>ROH</sub>: 0.060 in CAM and 0.041 in SAA), though some herds displayed elevated values, suggestive of recent inbreeding or reduced gene flow. ROH analysis revealed a predominance of short segments (&lt;2 Mb), consistent with background or historical inbreeding, and only a limited presence of long ROH (&gt;8 Mb). Shared ROH islands on chromosomes 8, 12, and 14 were detected across both breeds and most herds, encompassing functionally relevant genes involved in thermoregulation (<italic>AQP3</italic>), fertility (<italic>RNF17</italic>), metabolic balance (<italic>ATP12A</italic>), and stress resilience. Notably, <italic>VPS13B</italic> was consistently detected in 9 out of 10 herds and in both breeds, and is known for its involvement in female fertility and skeletal traits in ruminants. Breed-specific ROH islands revealed further candidate genes: <italic>SDC1, ARHGEF17</italic>, and <italic>CAPNS</italic>2 in CAM, and <italic>DNAJA1, ATP6V0D1, UBAP1</italic>, and <italic>ZDHHC1</italic> in SAA, related to milk production, mastitis resistance, heat stress response, and skeletal development. These findings highlight the value of integrating genomic tools into herd management. Genomic surveillance can guide sustainable selection strategies, mitigate inbreeding risks, and support the long-term genetic improvement of Alpine goat populations under diverse production systems.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>goats</kwd>
<kwd>Camosciata delle alpi</kwd>
<kwd>Saanen</kwd>
<kwd>genetic variability</kwd>
<kwd>homozygosity</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This project was funded by the EAFRD Rural Development Program 2014-2020, Management Autority Regione Lombardia -OP. 16.1.01 Project title: "Applicazione della genomica negli allevamenti di capre da latte - CapraGEN"; Project ID n. 202202380565 -'Operational Group EIP AGRI'.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="67"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="7452"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Animal Breeding and Genetics</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Conservation of biodiversity is a critical goal in the management of livestock genetic resources. Italy serves as an exemplary model due to its rich biodiversity among domesticated species, fostered by its diverse historical, environmental, climatic, and agricultural traditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Senczuk et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Goats, in particular, represent a significant component of this biodiversity, with over 30 indigenous breeds thriving in varied climates and farming systems, many of which operate under low-input agricultural practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Cortellari et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>).</p>
<p>The Alpine goat breeds, extensively farmed in northern Italy, particularly in the Alpine regions, are subject to a range of farming practices, from intensive indoor systems to extensive grazing. These breeds are highly valued for their dairy production, known for both quantity and quality of their milk. The Camosciata delle Alpi (CAM) is a dairy goat breed originating from the Alpine regions of Italy, Switzerland, France, and Austria. Well-adapted to mountainous environments, it is characterized by its resilience, strong physique, and excellent milk production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pegolo et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). The milk of the CAM breed is rich in fat and protein, making it particularly suitable for high-quality cheese production, a key factor in its economic relevance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Agradi et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Similarly, the Saanen (SAA) breed, originally from Switzerland, is recognized as one of the world&#x2019;s most productive dairy goats. It is renowned for its high milk yield, adaptability to various climates, and widespread use in commercial dairy production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">McSweeney and McNamara, 2022</xref>). However, in recent years, crossbreeding with Dutch white genetics &#x2013; intended to further enhance milk production &#x2013; has introduced significant challenges. The introduction of Dutch genetics into Italian Saanen populations is supported by practical evidence from breeders. Many Italian breeders report to breed their flocks using semen from Dutch Saanen lines to improve milk yield and other productive traits. Therefore, assessing the genetic diversity of these breeds is crucial to understand the impact of such crossbreeding practices on their resilience, productivity, and overall health characteristics.</p>
<p>In Italy, the Associazione Nazionale della Pastorizia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">AssoNaPa, 2025</xref>) is the breed society responsible for genetic programs in goats and sheep, in accordance with the EU &#x201c;Animal Breeding Regulation&#x201d; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Regulation (EU) 2016/1012, 2016</xref>), including the management of herdbooks for the Saanen and Camosciata delle Alpi goat breeds. In Lombardy, intensive (and some semi-intensive) indoor systems are common in lowland and valley areas, while semi-extensive and extensive modalities persist in upland and marginal terrain, producing differing management-driven selection pressures across herds. National selection tools, such as estimated breeding values (EBVs), and the gradual introduction of genomic monitoring, are available through AssoNaPa. While AssoNaPa routinely estimates EBVs for animals recorded in the herdbook with genealogical information, the reliability of pedigree data provided by farmers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">AssoNaPa, 2025</xref>), a fundamental input for genetic evaluation, is often incomplete or inaccurate. In many herds, in fact, a substantial proportion of animals lack fully recorded or correct genealogical information, particularly when natural mating occurs in groups with multiple bucks. As a result, selection decisions are often based primarily on farmer-recorded phenotypes, rather than on EBVs, which limits the efficiency of genetic improvement programs at both national and regional levels. In parallel, national monitoring and conservation programmes remain essential to track genomic diversity and safeguard smaller local breeds. These nationwide efforts provide context for interpreting herd-level genetic variability and inbreeding.</p>
<p>Inbreeding, in fact is a key aspect of genetic diversity and a major concern in livestock breeding, as it increases homozygosity and may reduce fitness. The inbreeding coefficient (F), traditionally estimated from pedigree data, is now often derived from Runs of Homozygosity (ROH), which provide a more accurate measure of autozygosity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Szpiech et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Peripolli et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). ROH are continuous homozygous segments within the genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Gibson et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>) that arise through inbreeding, genetic drift, or selection, and their length distribution offers insights into demographic history: short segments typically reflect ancient inbreeding, whereas long ones indicate more recent events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Keller et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Thus, ROH analyses provide information on both the genetic health of populations and on regions of the genome shaped by selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Purfield et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Kim et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Dixit et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Beyond individual-level inbreeding estimates, the distribution of ROH across a population can highlight shared regions of homozygosity, known as ROH islands&#xa0;(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Nothnagel et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). These genomic hotspots, where positive selection has increased the frequency of specific haplotypes, have been used to identify selection signatures in several livestock species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bertolini et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Grilz-Seger et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Mastrangelo et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Peripolli et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Xie et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). While such processes can favor beneficial mutations, they may also increase deleterious variants through genetic hitchhiking (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Szpiech et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Makino et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Assessing ROH patterns in Alpine (CAM and SAA) goats can therefore provide valuable insights into how breeding practices and management strategies have shaped their genetic structure as already done in other species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Punturiero et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>The aims of this study were: i) to characterize ROH patterns in both Alpine goats to understand how different breeding and management practices impact genetic diversity, and to identify genomic regions under putative selection; ii) to assess the impact of recent crossbreeding and reproductive strategies on the genomic integrity and structure of these populations. Details will then be reported at the individual farm level, providing both a general overview of the two breeds and highlighting the specific selective choice of each farm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>All procedures adhered to European and Italian legislation (2010/63/EU Directive and Legislative Decree No. 26/2014) and received approval from the Animal Welfare Body of the Universit&#xe0; degli Studi di Milano (OPBA) as well as the Italian Ministry of Health (protocol number OPBA_68_2023).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Animal sampling, DNA extraction, and genotyping</title>
<p>This research was part of the goals of the CapraGEN project (Application of GENomics in Dairy Goat Breeding), funded by the Lombardy Region, which aims to apply advanced genomic tools to improve the understanding of dairy goat genetic resources, with particular attention to both intra- and inter-herd dynamics. Through comprehensive genomic analyses, the project aimed to investigate the genetic consequences of current breeding practices and to identify genomic regions that may have been shaped by selection for productive and adaptive traits. The findings provide essential insights to support evidence-based strategies for the sustainable breeding, genetic conservation, and long-term viability of Alpine goat populations in Lombardy.</p>
<p>A total of 1,283 Alpine goats (CAM = 977; SAA = 306, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>) were sampled from ten distinct farms within the Lombardy region of Italy using ear Tissue Sampling Unit (TSU). The Quick-DNA&#x2122; Miniprep kit (Zymo Research) was used to extract DNA from the ear tissue following the provided protocol. All collected samples were cataloged in a project-structured database and stored at the University of Milan tissue repository, the Animal Bio-Arkive (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Longeri et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Number of individuals sampled per breed and herd, all managed under intensive systems.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Herd</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Herd&#x2019;s location (Province)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">N. goats CAM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">N. goats SAA</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Min and max n. lactations per goat</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Production focus</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Pavia</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">83</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milk/cheese</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Bergamo</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">144</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milk/cheese</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Brescia</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">141</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milk</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Como</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">126</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milk/cheese</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milano</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milk/cheese</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Lodi</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">379</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milk/cheese</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Brescia</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milk</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Bergamo</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">121</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milk</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Brescia</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">135</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milky/cheese</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milano</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Milk/cheese</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Total N.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">977</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">306</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>All animals included in this study were genotyped using the Neogen GGP Goat 70K chip. All samples had a call rate exceeding 98% and only SNPs located on the 29 autosomes with MAF &#x2265; 1%, with &#x2265; 98% genotyping rate, with no duplicate positions, as annotated in the ARS1.2 Goat genome assembly, were retained for analysis (final markers dataset: 64,273 SNPs).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<sec id="s2_3_1">
<label>2.3.1</label>
<title>Genetic variability at breed and farm levels</title>
<p>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed separately for the two breeds to assess genetic diversity among animals from the ten herds. The analysis was conducted using the SNP &amp; Variation Suite (SVS) v8.9 software (Golden Helix Inc., Bozeman, MT, USA). The graphical representation of the PCA results was generated using the &#x2018;ggplot2&#x2019; R package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Wilkinson, 2011</xref>). The expected and observed heterozygosity (He and Ho) were calculated using Plink v1.9, to provide a complementary measure of genetic diversity within and between the studied breeds.</p>
<p>To further investigate the genetic structure of the studied populations, an admixture analysis was performed using ADMIXTURE v1.3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Alexander et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). A random subset of 20 samples per group was selected using R-Studio software, applying a fixed random seed to ensure reproducibility of the procedure. Two hundred and twenty samples were then analyzed to ensure balanced representation across groups and adequate within-farm diversity, while maintaining computational efficiency. This sampling design provides robust estimates of population structure, as supported by previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Alexander et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lawson et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The number of ancestral populations (K) was inferred by running ADMIXTURE ten times for each K value, ranging from 1 to 6. For each K, the replicate with the highest log-likelihood was retained. The optimal K was then selected based on the lowest average cross-validation (CV) error across replicates, following the standard ADMIXTURE procedure. A linkage disequilibrium (LD) pruning was performed with &#x2013;indep-pairwise 50 10 0.5 parameters, resulting in a final dataset of 46,397 SNPs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_2">
<label>2.3.2</label>
<title>Runs of homozygosity detection</title>
<p>ROH were identified for all 1,283 goats in the dataset by the &#x201c;consecutive run&#x201d; method from the &#x201c;detectRUNS&#x201d; package in R Software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Biscarini et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>) using the dataset of 64,273 SNPs (no pruned). The parameters used were: (i) minimum number of 20 SNPs/ROH; (ii) a minimum length of 500,000 bp; (iii) the maximum gap of 1 Mbp between two consecutive SNPs; (iv) no missing SNPs as well as no heterozygous genotypes allowed in ROH definition. We applied stringent parameters within the consecutive method to minimize false positives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hillestad et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). This approach, compared with sliding-window strategies, is also more conservative, particularly for short ROH, since it requires uninterrupted homozygosity and therefore provides higher confidence that detected segments represent true autozygosity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Ojeda-Mar&#xed;n et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>The ROH distribution for each herd was assessed separately using five ROH length categories (&lt;2 Mb, 2&#x2013;4 Mb, 4&#x2013;8 Mb, 8&#x2013;16 Mb, and &gt;16 Mb). Descriptive statistics were calculated at the individual level, including the total number of ROH, the number of ROH per individual, and the average ROH length. The ggplot2 package was used to generate Manhattan plots representing the percentage of SNPs falling within ROH, calculated by counting how often each SNP appears within a ROH across all individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Wickham, 2016</xref>). The identification of ROH islands was performed using the detectRUNS package, which detected peaks in the Manhattan plot where SNPs were located within ROH in more than 30% of the goats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Schiavo et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Only ROH islands containing more than 5 SNPs were retained to avoid identifying spurious ROH islands caused by isolated high-frequency SNPs.</p>
<p>Gene annotation was performed using the Genome Data Viewer tool from the NCBI database, freely available online (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gdv">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gdv</ext-link>). The obtained list of genes was then used as input in the Animal QTLdb to identify previously reported quantitative trait loci (QTLs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). For all genes annotated within the ROH islands, QTLs associated with traits were retrieved using the &#x2018;Search by Associated Gene&#x2019; feature in the Cattle QTLdb (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), which links annotated genes to QTLs reported in the literature.</p>
<p>The STRING of Cytoscape 3.10.1 was employed to construct gene interaction networks, to identify functional associations within the candidate genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Shannon et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_3">
<label>2.3.3</label>
<title>Inbreeding coefficients</title>
<p>Genomic molecular inbreeding was assessed using two distinct coefficients: F<sub>HOM</sub> and F<sub>ROH</sub>.</p>
<p>F<sub>HOM</sub> coefficient, which reflects the excess of the observed number of homozygous genotypes was calculated with SVS, following:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>Hom<sub>Ob</sub></italic> and <italic>Hom<sub>Ex</sub></italic> are the observed and expected homozygous genotypes, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Wright, 1949</xref>). The F<sub>HOM</sub> coefficients were calculated at the herd level rather than at the breed level, in order to provide a more accurate picture of inbreeding which are often influenced by specific management and mating practices within each herd.</p>
<p>The F<sub>ROH</sub> coefficient was estimated using the &#x201c;detectRUNS&#x201d; package in R. This coefficient represents the proportion of an individual&#x2019;s genome covered by ROH. This was determined using the following formula (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">McQuillan et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>L<sub>ROH</sub></italic> is the total length of all ROHs of an individual, <italic>L<sub>aut</sub></italic> refers to the length of the autosomal genome covered by the SNPs used in this study (2,468,379,888 bp) spanning chromosomes 1 to 29.</p>
<p>The correlation between F<sub>ROH</sub> and F<sub>HOM</sub> was first summarized at the breed level using the coefficient of determination (R&#xb2;) to provide an initial overview. Subsequently, correlations were calculated separately for each herd using both Pearson and Spearman methods. Pearson correlation was used as the primary measure, while Spearman served as a robustness check to account for potential deviations from normality or linearity in the data.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Genetic variability at breed and herd levels</title>
<p>The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot for CAM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold></xref>) shows a homogeneous distribution of animals across herds, with the exception of Herd_06, which exhibits high genetic variability among its goats. The PCA plots for the individual herds (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold></xref>) reveal that only Herd_02 displays a distribution of samples spanning the entire plot area. In all other herds, two or more distinct clusters are observed.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a)</bold> PCA of CAM goats (PC_1 = 22.9%, PC_2 = 14.4%); <bold>(b)</bold> PCA of SAA goats (PC_1 = 21.8%, PC_2 = 13.2%); <bold>(c)</bold> PCA of CAM vs SAA goats (PC_1 = 30.8%, PC_2 = 15.6%).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fanim-06-1664380-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three scatter plots showing principal component analysis (PCA) of goat herds. Top left is PCA for Camosciata delle Alpi herds with seven color-coded groups. Bottom left is PCA for Saanen herds with three distinctive groups. Right shows combined PCA of Camosciata delle Alpi and Saanen breeds, highlighted in blue and green, depicting their distribution. Each plot lists eigenvalues and percentage of variance for principal components.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>The PCA plot in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold></xref> reveals three distinct clusters corresponding to the three herds farming Saanen goats. Herd_08 is clearly separated from the other two along the PC_1 axis, which accounts for 21.8% of the total genetic variability. Additionally, within each SAA herd (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold></xref>), individuals tend to cluster into multiple subgroups.</p>
<p>The combined PCA of the two breeds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold></xref>) displays a breed-specific separation, characterized by a V-shaped distribution of clusters: SAA individuals are primarily aligned along the PC_1 axis, while CAM individuals show greater dispersion along PC_2.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref> summarizes the average Ho and He, along with their standard deviations, for each herd within the CAM and SAA breeds. In general, both breeds exhibit similar levels of genetic diversity, with mean He values ranging narrowly around 0.396. Within the CAM breed, Ho values are relatively consistent across herds, ranging from 0.3752 (Herd_04) to 0.3831 (Herd_07), and standard deviations are low, indicating limited variation within herds. In contrast, the SAA breed shows slightly higher and more variable Ho values, particularly in Herd_08, which presents the highest mean Ho (0.3983) and the largest standard deviation (0.0329), suggesting greater intra-herd genetic variability. The observed heterozygosity in Herd_10 (0.3843) is closer to the values seen in CAM herds, while Herd_09 shows intermediate values. Overall, CAM and SAA exhibit lower observed heterozygosity compared to expected heterozygosity, which may indicate a certain degree of inbreeding within the two populations of all farms.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity and standard deviations (sd) both per breed and Herd.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Breed</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Herd</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">mean_Ho</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">sd_Ho</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">mean_He</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">sd_He</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">CAM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3783</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0149</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3955</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3767</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0153</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3960</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3802</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0178</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3960</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3752</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0177</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3957</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3815</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0082</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3961</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3806</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0166</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3958</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3831</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0101</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3960</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="left">SAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3983</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0329</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3988</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3937</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.014</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3959</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3843</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0226</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3961</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>To further investigate population structure and potential admixture, the ADMIXTURE analysis was performed using K values from 2 to 7. The optimal number of clusters was determined to be K = 4, based on the lowest average cross-validation (CV) error assessed with ADMIXTURE as graphically represented in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold></xref>. Results revealed distinct ancestry patterns between the CAM and SAA breeds, as well as heterogeneity among herds within each breed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold></xref>). In the CAM herds (Herd_01 to Herd_07), ancestry proportions varied considerably across herds: Herd_01 showed a prevalent contribution of Ancestor 1 (61%), suggesting a more homogeneous genetic background in line with a specific breeding line. In contrast, Herd_02 and Herd_06 were primarily composed of Ancestor 3 (72%) and Ancestor 4 (67%), respectively. In the SAA herds the genetic background is predominantly shaped by Ancestor 2, which accounts for the majority of the estimated genome-wide ancestry in these populations. Herd_10 shows the highest contribution, with 92%, followed by Herd_09 (87%) and Herd_08 (62%).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Individual ancestry proportions for Alpine goats from each herd based on ADMIXTURE analysis (K = 4).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fanim-06-1664380-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart showing ADMIXTURE ancestry proportions for herds. Goats from herds 1 to 7 belong to the CAM breed, and goats from herds 8 to 10 belong to the SAA breed. Ancestry components include Anc_1 (green), Anc_2 (red), Anc_3 (orange), and Anc_4 (yellow). The proportions vary across each herd, showing distinct patterns.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Runs of homozygosity</title>
<p>A total of 113,248 ROHs were identified across the 1,283 animals analyzed. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"><bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold></xref> summarizes the distribution of these ROHs within each herd. The number of ROHs detected was highly correlated with herd size (97.8%). On average, each individual across all herds had 82 &#xb1; 38 ROHs (CAM and SAA). The fewest ROHs were found in a goat from Herd_08 CAM, with just 12 ROHs, whereas the highest number, 417 ROHs, was observed in a goat from Herd_04. Herd_04 not only exhibited the highest number of ROHs per individual on average (107.7 &#xb1; 36.2) but it also has the highest percentage of the genome covered by ROHs (7.8%). The number of SNPs contained in a ROH varies across herds with a maximum of 741 SNPs registered in an animal from Herd_06.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Descriptive statistics for the ROH identified according to each Herd, and for overall CAM and SAA.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Breed</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Herd</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Total ROH</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">SNP n.</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Average ROH number</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Average ROH length (Mbp)</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Mean coverage<sup>1</sup> (%)<sup>2</sup></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Mean &#xb1; SD</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Range</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Mean &#xb1; SD</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Range</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="center">CAM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8,292</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 293</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">99.90 &#xb1; 36.17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">55 &#x2013; 388</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.63 &#xb1; 0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 10.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">163,183,009 (6.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14,150</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 499</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">98.26 &#xb1; 29.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">58 &#x2013; 286</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.85 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 18.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">181,393,933 (7.3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13,287</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 302</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">94.23 &#xb1; 37.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29 &#x2013; 384</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.67 &#xb1; 0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 11.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">158,296,006 (6.4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13,565</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 445</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">107.66 &#xb1; 36.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">69 &#x2013; 417</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.79 &#xb1; 0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 17.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">193,527,100 (7.8%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2,592</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 309</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">89.38 &#xb1; 20.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43 &#x2013; 147</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.60 &#xb1; 0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 11.77</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">143,724,211 (5.8%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33,831</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 741</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">89.26 &#xb1; 35.24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43 &#x2013; 343</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.74 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 27.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">155,410,159 (6.3%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6,219</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 295</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">82.61 &#xb1; 26.77</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37 &#x2013; 191</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.60 &#xb1; 0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 10.58</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">133,243,688 (5.4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">SAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6,366</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 353</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52.61 &#xb1; 34.66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12 &#x2013; 217</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.61 &#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 12.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">84,869,461 (3.4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10,288</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 334</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76.21 &#xb1; 34.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24 &#x2013; 243</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.64 &#xb1; 0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 12.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">125,006,778 (5.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Herd_10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4,658</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 302</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">93.16 &#xb1; 52.90</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30 &#x2013; 284</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.67 &#xb1; 0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 10.97</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">161,419,260 (6.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Total</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CAM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">91,936</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 741</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">94.06 &#xb1; 34.55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29 &#x2013; 417</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.73 &#xb1; 012</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 27.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">163,184,029 (6.61)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">SAA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21,312</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20 &#x2013; 353</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">69.64 &#xb1; 40.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12 &#x2013; 284</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.65 &#xb1; 0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5 &#x2013; 12.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115,085,238 (4.66)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>SNP n.= number of SNPs identified; SD=standard deviation;</p></fn>
<fn>
<p>1Mean Coverage = Average length of ROH coverage per genome across all herds, calculated first per sample and then averaged within each herd.</p></fn>
<fn>
<p><sup>2</sup>%: Proportion calculated as the ratio between the Mean Coverage value and the genome length covered by the 64,273 SNPs = 2,468,379,888 base pairs (bp)</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold></xref> illustrates the distribution of ROH frequencies across all autosomes for each of the herds analyzed. The heatmap illustrates the average within-herd frequency of ROH coverage across each chromosome, providing a herd-level overview of autozygosity distribution along the genome. In general, CHR1 to CHR6 show the highest ROH frequencies across most herds. In contrast, CHR25 to CHR29 consistently exhibit lower ROH frequencies across all herds. This pattern is consistent for both breeds.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Distribution of ROH frequencies per CHR across each analyzed herd.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fanim-06-1664380-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Heatmap illustrating ROH frequency across herds and chromosomes. Herds are listed on the y-axis, divided into SAA and CAM groups, while chromosomes (1-29) are on the x-axis. Frequency ranges from 0.02 to 0.08, represented by yellow to dark red.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>The ROH identified across populations were classified into five length classes. The frequency of ROHs in each class is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>. The most frequent ROHs were those shorter than 2 Mb, which comprised over 74% of the total ROHs detected. ROHs longer than 16 Mb were detected in only seven CAM goats (Herd_02, n=2; Herd_04, n=1; Herd_06, n=3), which is why this category is not represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>. The distribution of ROHs across length classes is consistent among the herds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Proportion of ROH for each class of length for each Herd and breed.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fanim-06-1664380-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Stacked bar chart comparing ROH classes of length across CAM and SAA herds. Each herd's bar is divided into four color-coded classes: red for less than two Mbp, orange for two to four Mbp, yellow for four to eight Mbp, and green for eight to sixteen Mbp. The CAM herds show a higher prevalence of the lowest ROH length class.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref> illustrates the distribution of SNPs located within ROH across all autosomes, shown as Manhattan plots for the two breeds (CAM and SAA). For each breed, the analysis was performed by combining all individuals across herds. Manhattan plots of individual herds are available in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold></xref>. Although no single island was shared across all herds, recurrent regions emerged both within (at herd level) and between breeds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"><bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold></xref>). Notably, highly frequent ROH islands were mapped on CHR14 shared by 6 CAM and 3 SAA herds, and on CHR12 and CHR8 in common among 6 CAM and 2 SAA herds.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Manhattan plots showing the proportion of SNPs within ROH across all autosomes for CAM (top) and SAA (bottom) goats (all Herds were analysed together by breed).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fanim-06-1664380-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two Manhattan plots display SNP percentage in ROH across chromosomes for CAM and SAA. The CAM plot, in shades of blue, exhibits peaks at chromosome 11. The SAA plot, in green, shows similar peaks. A red dashed line marks the significance threshold.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>ROH islands details and annotated genes.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">CHR</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">CAM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">SAA</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Start</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">End</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Genes</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">64491873</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">64965666</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NUP37, PARPBP, PMCH, IGF1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_04, Herd_06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">69633866</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">70344907</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PRDM4, ASCL4, RTCB, BPIFC, FBXO7, TIMP3, SYN3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">108659404</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">109810433</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">MICALL1, C5H22orf23, POLR2F, SOX10, PICK1, SLC16A8, BAIAP2L2, PLA2G6, MAFF, TMEM184B, KCNJ4, KDELR3, DDX17, DMC1, FAM227A, CBY1, TOMM22, JOSD1, GTPBP1, SUN2, DNAL4, NPTXR, CBX6, CBX7, PDGFB, RPL3, SYNGR1, TAB1, MGAT3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">109819318</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">112678786</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">MGAT3, MIEF1, ATF4, RPS19BP1, CACNA1I, ENTHD1, GRAP2, FAM83F, TNRC6B, ADSL, SGSM3, MKL1, MCHR1, SLC25A17, ST13, XPNPEP3, DNAJB7, RBX1, EP300, L3MBTL2, CHADL, RANGAP1, ZC3H7B, TEF, TOB2, PHF5A, ACO2, POLR3H, CSDC2, PMM1, DESI1, XRCC6, SNU13, MEI1, CCDC134, SREBF2, MIR33A, SHISA8, TNFRSF13C, CENPM, SEPT3, WBP2NL, NAGA, FAM109B, SMDT1, NDUFA6, TCF20, NFAM1, SERHL2, RRP7A, POLDIP3, A4GALT, ARFGAP3, PACSIN2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34257575</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34831119</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CCSER1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">58594485</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59994807</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">TLR10, TLR1, RPL9, TLR6, TMEM156, RFC1, KLB, LIAS, UGDH, RHOH, CHRNA9, KLHL5, WDR19, SMIM14, UBE2K, PDS5A, RBM47, FAM114A1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">78018184</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">79209818</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ADGRL3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">58759016</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59086180</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">SLC35A4, APBB3, EIF4EBP3, SRA1, SLC4A9, HBEGF, PFDN1, CYSTM1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">69104053</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">69497379</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">LGI3, SFTPC, MIR320, POLR3D, HR, REEP4, BMP1, PIWIL2, SLC39A14, PPP3CC, PHYHIP</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"><bold>Herd_01, Herd_02, Herd_03, Herd_05, Herd_06, Herd_07</bold></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_09, Herd_010</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">74508923</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">75427691</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">APTX, DNAJA1, <bold>SMU1, B4GALT1, SPINK4, BAG1, CHMP5, NFX1, AQP7, AQP3, NOL6, UBE2R2, UBAP2, DCAF12</bold>, UBAP1, KIF24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_01, Herd_02, Herd_04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_08, Herd_010</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37760119</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38712070</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CFAP36, PPP4R3B, EFEMP1, PNPT1, MIR217, MIR216B, CCDC85A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_01, Herd_02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">70960216</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">71577169</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PLB1, FOSL2, BRE, RBKS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_01, Herd_02, Herd_06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">77891124</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">78577786</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">GDF7, HS1BP3, RHOB, PUM2, SDC1, LAPTM4A, MATN3, WDR35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"><bold>Herd_01, Herd_02, Herd_03, Herd_04, Herd_05, Herd_07</bold></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_09, Herd_010</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49710719</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50807424</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"><bold>ATP12A, RNF17, CENPJ, PARP4, MPHOSPH8, PSPC1, ZMYM5, ZMYM2,</bold> GJA3, GJB2, GJB6, CRYL1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"><bold>Herd_01, Herd_02</bold></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_08, Herd_09_Herd_010</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59935502</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60862705</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">MAB21L1, <bold>NBEA</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_02, Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1195883</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1879609</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PLCB1, PLCB4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_01, Herd_02, Herd_03, Herd_04,<break/>Herd_05, Herd_07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_08, Herd_09_Herd_010</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16937162</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17757900</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">VPS13B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_01, Herd_02, <italic>Herd_05</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29781069</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30731024</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">RAB6A, PLEKHB1, FAM168A, RELT, <italic>ARHGEF17, P2RY6, P2RY2, FCHSD2</italic>, ATG16L2, STARD10, ARAP1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2885958</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2980897</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ZNRF3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_01, Herd_02, <italic>Herd_05</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25227062</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26113989</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">LPCAT2, CAPNS2, <italic>SLC6A2, MT3, MT4, BBS2, NUDT21, AMFR, OGFOD1, GNAO1</italic></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_09, Herd_010</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36166515</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37136273</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PLEKHG4, KCTD19, LRRC36, TPPP3, ZDHHC1, HSD11B2, ATP6V0D1, FAM65A, AGRP, CTCF, CARMIL2, ACD, PARD6A, ENKD1, C18H16orf86, GFOD2, RANBP10, TSNAXIP1, CENPT, THAP11, NUTF2, EDC4, NRN1L, PSKH1, PSMB10, LCAT, SLC12A4, DPEP3, DPEP2, DDX28, DUS2, NFATC3, ESRP2, PLA2G15, SLC7A6, SLC7A6OS, PRMT7, SMPD3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50636192</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51078927</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PRX, SERTAD1, SERTAD3, BLVRB, SPTBN4, SHKBP1, LTBP4, NUMBL, COQ8B, ITPKC, C18H19orf54, SNRPA, MIA, RAB4B, EGLN2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">58443269</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">58445841</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">VSIG10L</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Herd_05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49370016</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51133143</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CISD1, IPMK, UBE2D1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Herds and genes annotated in the corresponding region are highlighted using the same style (Normal, Bold, Underlined, or Italics).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>A total of 105 genes were annotated within the ROH islands (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"><bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold></xref>), including 29 unique to CAM ROH, 17 unique to SAA ROH, and 59 shared between the two breeds. Among these, 26 genes overlap with QTL associated with production, reproductive, and functional traits, as reported in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table S1</bold></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Inbreeding coefficients</title>
<p>The average genomic inbreeding coefficient based on ROH (F<sub>ROH</sub>) was 0.060 for CAM and 0.041 for SAA goats (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table S2</bold></xref>). The highest F<sub>ROH</sub> values observed were 0.437 in Herd_04 (CAM) and 0.216 in Herd_10 (SAA). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold></xref> displays the distribution of F<sub>ROH</sub> across four ROH length classes (&lt;2 Mb, 2&#x2013;4 Mb, 4&#x2013;8 Mb, and 8&#x2013;16 Mb) in each herd. The herd-specific coefficients are detailed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table S3</bold></xref>. Herd_08 showed the lowest F<sub>ROH</sub> values across all length classes in both breeds. This trend is reflected in the overall mean F<sub>ROH</sub> values of Herd_08, which were 0.036 in CAM and 0.033 in SAA. Due to the limited number of animals presenting ROH longer than 16 Mb, this class has not been considered in the graphical representation. In the 8&#x2013;16 Mb class, associated with more recent genomic inbreeding, average F<sub>ROH</sub> values per herd ranged from 0.004 to 0.008, with the highest value observed in Herd_02.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Graphical representations (boxplots) of F<sub>ROH</sub> values, categorized according to the five different classes of ROH lengths <bold>(A)</bold>; Coefficient of determination (R2) calculated between F<sub>ROH</sub> and F<sub>HOM</sub>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fanim-06-1664380-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel A shows box plots of inbreeding coefficients for herds from CAM and SAA, categorized by ROH length classes: less than 2 Mbp, 2 to 4 Mbp, 4 to 8 Mbp, and 8 to 16 Mbp. Each class is represented by different colors. Panel B includes two scatter plots depicting the relationship between FHOM and FROH for CAM and SAA, with trend lines and respective equations: CAM shows \( y = 0.6966x + 0.083 \) with \( R^2 = 0.867 \); SAA shows \( y = 0.8043x + 0.0602 \) with \( R^2 = 0.9162 \).</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>The F<sub>HOM</sub> values, which reflect the excess of observed homozygosity compared to expected values, were negative on average for both breeds (&#x2212;0.023 in CAM and &#x2212;0.017 in SAA), with higher values of 0.421 (Herd_04) for CAM and of 0.189 (Herd_09) for SAA. The descriptive statistics of F<sub>HOM</sub> values calculated for each herd is reported in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table S2</bold></xref>.</p>
<p>At the breed level, R&#xb2; values indicate a strong overall correlation between F<sub>ROH</sub> and F<sub>HOM</sub> (0.86 for CAM and 0.91 for SAA; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold></xref>). When examined by herd, Pearson r ranged from 0.93 to 0.99 (R&#xb2; = 0.87&#x2013;0.98), while Spearman p ranged from 0.88 to 0.97, with all p-values highly significant. These results confirm that both metrics consistently reflect individual genomic inbreeding, with detailed values provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table S4</bold></xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Alpine dairy goats such as CAM and SAA hold a pivotal role in sustaining genetic diversity and local dairy traditions in northern Italy. These breeds are extensively reared not only in mountain and pre-Alpine areas, where they contribute to landscape preservation and rural livelihoods, but also in lowland commercial farms, where their high productivity and adaptability support large farm milk production systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Battaglini, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Cortellari et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>).</p>
<p>By combining PCA, admixture analyses, ROH profiling, and inbreeding&#x2010;coefficient estimates, we obtained a comprehensive picture of the genomic structure of CAM and SAA goats across the ten Lombardy farms. These complementary approaches reveal how herd-specific management strategies and historical breeding choices have shaped the genomic landscape of both breeds, influencing levels of homozygosity, inbreeding, and differentiation among herds. Herds enrolled in this study operate independently, with breeding and mating plans based on the goals and reproductive management practices of each farmer. The clear separation between CAM and SAA in the combined PCA reflects breed-level genetic differentiation, in line with previous findings in these goat breeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Brito et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Within CAM, most herds formed tight clusters, indicative of relatively homogeneous breeding lines. However, Herd_06 showed a broader dispersion, likely reflecting the use of bucks from diverse genetic origins, which may have introduced greater variability. In contrast, all SAA herds exhibited greater genetic dispersion, possibly due to the introgression of Dutch genetic lines introduced to enhance milk production, as reported by breeders at the time of herd book registration (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table S5</bold></xref>). ADMIXTURE analysis with K = 4 revealed a complex ancestral structure within and across herds, despite the dataset including only two breeds (CAM and SAA). This suggests the presence of multiple genetic backgrounds within each breed, likely due to the use of bucks from different national or commercial lines, as well as herd-specific breeding strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Punturiero et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In CAM herds, distinct ancestry components point to limited exchange of genetic material among farms and selection focused on different traits or production goals. These differences indicate that CAM herds do not share a uniform genetic profile but instead reflect herd-specific selection histories or the use of bucks from distinct genetic sources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Waineina et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The consistent ancestral signal observed in most herds suggests a shared genetic foundation, likely due to the use of similar or closely related breeding lines. Regarding the SAA, Herd_08 stands out with a slightly more admixed profile respect Herd_09 and Herd_10, showing larger contributions from ancestors 1, 3, and 4, may be because the presence of CAM goats in past generations. Similar dynamics have been reported in other European dairy goat populations, where intensive selection, the importation of genetic material of selected bucks, and constrained within-herd mating practices have contributed to fine-scale population structuring (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Peripolli et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Mastrangelo et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>When we compared the number of shared bucks across FA herds (using the official animal identification code recorded in the herdbook provided by farmers), we observed a very limited level of common FA bucks use (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table S5</bold></xref>). The same buck was used in a maximum of three herds, and typically sired between two and six half-sibling daughters per farm. This restricted sharing pattern suggests that male selection in these herds is largely independent, with each farm relying on its own breeding strategy and limited external male input. This low level of buck sharing likely contributes to the variability observed in the admixture profiles of herds using instrumental insemination. Unlike the two SAA herds, which displayed consistent ancestral signals, the CAM herds showed more heterogeneous patterns. The observed differences in admixture can be explained by the use of distinct and often unrelated sires, resulting in herd-specific genetic backgrounds. Independent mating strategies and limited gene flow between herds have likely shaped these unique genetic structures, as reflected in the varying degrees of admixture identified across farms.</p>
<p>Inbreeding estimates and ROH.</p>
<p>The moderate overall F<sub>ROH</sub> (0.060 in CAM; 0.041 in SAA) and negative mean F<sub>HOM</sub> (-0.023 in CAM; -0.017 in SAA) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table S2</bold></xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table S3</bold></xref>) indicate that, despite some recent inbreeding, most herds is keen to maintain genetic variability varying at best the male used in reproduction, similar to other well&#x2212;managed dairy goat populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Luigi-Sierra et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Vostry et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The high correlation observed between F<sub>ROH</sub> and F<sub>HOM</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold></xref>) suggests that homozygosity is not randomly distributed across the genome, but rather tends to cluster within ROH.</p>
<p>The genome-wide ROH identified in this study, revealed a predominance of short segments (&lt;2 Mb), which are typically indicative of ancient inbreeding events or past population bottlenecks, where increased homozygosity results from remote common ancestors. Over generations, recombination fragments these regions, leading to shorter homozygous tracts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Keller et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Peripolli et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Interestingly, ROH segments between 8&#x2013;16 Mb were observed only in a few individuals. This pattern may reflect occasional recent inbreeding events, which could occur unintentionally in large-scale herds where the management of mating groups to control inbreeding becomes more complex. While small herds often apply well-structured breeding strategies, larger operations may face challenges due to the lack of mandatory paternity testing and the potential for misassigned sires across mating groups. In such cases, the true pedigree structure can become blurred, leading to undetected related matings and, consequently, longer ROH in some animals. The near absence of ROH &gt;16 Mb, however, suggests that very close kin matings (e.g., parent-offspring) remain rare.</p>
<p>The distribution of ROH observed in Alpine goats in this study aligns with findings in other goat breeds, such as Egyptian and various Italian breeds, where a predominance of short ROH segments has been reported, suggesting historical selection and inbreeding events. Recent studies on Alpine and Mediterranean goat breeds have further highlighted breed-specific ROH patterns, reflecting the influence of breeding practices and environmental adaptations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Manunza et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Pegolo et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Similar patterns of ROH length distributions, reflecting both ancient and recent inbreeding, have also been reported in other livestock species such as cattle and sheep, highlighting the general influence of herd management, mating strategies, and demographic history on genomic homozygosity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Strillacci et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benedetti del Rio et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). The integration of ROH length distribution with the analysis of ROH islands adds further resolution to these patterns. While short ROHs point to ancient demographic events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Doekes et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), ROH islands reveal signatures of both shared and herd-specific selective pressures. Several genomic regions are common to both CAM and SAA, consistent with their shared ancestry and exposure to similar selection regimes, whereas others appear breed-specific, reflecting divergent breeding goals and management choices. Moreover, some ROH islands are consistently shared across multiple herds (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"><bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold></xref>), which may indicate the diffusion of particular haplotypes through the widespread use of popular sires or parallel selection schemes. Conversely, herd-specific ROH islands highlight unique management histories or localized selection pressures. Taken together, these findings demonstrate how both historical demographic processes and herd-level breeding dynamics have shaped the genomic landscape of Alpine dairy goats in Lombardy.</p>
<p><italic>Common ROH islands &#x2013; CAM and SAA</italic>.</p>
<p>Regarding ROH islands, when grouping herds by breed, we identified three shared homozygous regions: on CHR8 (74 Mbp), CHR12 (49 Mbp), and CHR14 (16 Mbp). These regions harbor 19 genes, of which several appear in the STRING/Cytoscape network (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S4</bold></xref>), highlighting functional connections among genes related to stress adaptation (<italic>ZMYM2, PARP4</italic>), metabolic homeostasis (<italic>AQP3, ATP12A</italic>), and fertility (<italic>RNF17, PSPC1</italic>). Notably, many of these genes show convergent selection signals in small ruminants. For example, <italic>ZMYM2, PARP4, PSPC1, MPHOSPH8</italic>, <italic>ATP12A</italic>, and <italic>RNF17</italic> have been found in ROH islands in Italian Garfagnina goats and Mediterranean breeds selected for resilience and productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Dadousis et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Serranito et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The gene <italic>RNF17</italic>, crucial for spermatogenesis and gamete interactions, was also identified in Egyptian Barki goats, strengthening its role in reproductive efficiency and environmental resilience (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sallam et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The aquaporin genes, <italic>AQP3</italic> and <italic>AQP7</italic>, are essential for water, glycerol, and urea transport, enabling thermoregulation and heat-stress adaptation. Additionally, <italic>AQP3</italic> has been linked to reduced reproductive performance in goats under repeated estrus synchronization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In addition, the <italic>AQP3, AQP7, UBE2R2, NFX1, DCAF12</italic>, and <italic>UBAP2</italic> genes appear within heterozygosity-rich or selected regions across sheep and goat breeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">M&#xe9;sz&#xe1;rosov&#xe1; et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Recent studies in livestock, including goats, have characterized heterozygosity-rich regions (HRRs) that overlap with ROH islands. If any of our ROH islands (for example, on CHR8 at 74 Mbp) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chessari et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>) overlaps with a known HRR, this would indicate that the region is homozygous in certain populations but highly variable in others. This pattern is a hallmark of balancing selection, where functionally important variants (e.g., related to immunity, stress adaptation, fertility) are maintained as both fixed and polymorphic across different lineages.</p>
<p>The <italic>VPS13B</italic> gene emerged as one of the most consistently detected across analyses: it was present in both CAM and SAM groups and found in 9 out of 10 herds examined. <italic>VPS13B</italic> has functional relevance supported by associations in both cattle and goats. In <italic>Bos taurus</italic>, <italic>VPS13B</italic> resides within a QTL on CHR14 linked to female fertility and milk production traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). In addition, <italic>VPS13B</italic> has been identified as under selection in Mediterranean and Chinese goats and is linked to leg morphology, a trait frequently correlated with fertility and milk yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Amiri Ghanatsaman et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Breed</italic> sp<italic>ecific ROH_islands &#x2013; CAM</italic>.</p>
<p>Among the genes unique to CAM herds, several exhibit strong cross-species associations with economically important traits. In the domain of stress resilience and immune function, <italic>AMFR</italic> was identified in a dairy cattle GWAS as a candidate for heat-stress response and milk fatty acid composition, while <italic>ATG16L2</italic>, an autophagy-related gene, has been linked to immune resilience and mastitis recovery in Holsteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Welderufael et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Additional genes involved in disease resistance and immune modulation include <italic>ARHGEF17</italic>, has been associated with disease resistance in cattle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ghoreishifar et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and linked to gastrointestinal nematode resilience through IgA regulation in sheep (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Atlija et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). A similar immunological role has also been <italic>proposed for the RELT</italic> and <italic>FCHSD2</italic> genes.</p>
<p>In terms of growth and skeletal development, <italic>ARAP1</italic> is located within QTL regions relevant to viability and meat productivity in sheep hybrids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Zlobin et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), while <italic>MATN3</italic> variants are robustly tied to skeletal integrity and stature in cattle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Lopdell and Littlejohn, 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The <italic>CAPNS2</italic> gene, which encodes calpain-2, plays a significant role in follicular development and has been specifically implicated in goat reproductive physiology, as shown in a study comparing gene expression in the ovaries of polytocous and monotocous dairy goats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">An et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Breed</italic> sp<italic>ecific ROH_islands &#x2013; SAA</italic>.</p>
<p>Among the genes unique to SAA herds, several have well-characterized roles in functional and production traits across livestock. A key finding is the association of <italic>APTX</italic> with the marbling score in Hanwoo cattle: co-expression network analysis highlighted <italic>APTX</italic> as a hub gene correlated with intramuscular fat content, supporting its potential role in meat quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lim et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). In dairy cattle, <italic>ATP6V0D1</italic> was identified via integrated transcriptomic&#x2013;proteomic analysis in Holstein mammary glands, suggesting its involvement in ATP production in the mammary tissue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dai et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Multiple genes also contribute to environmental adaptation, especially in heat and thermal stress response. <italic>DNAJA1</italic>, an HSP40 chaperone, was highly expressed in sheep mammary tissue and linked to milk synthesis, while also being repeatedly associated with heat-stress response in cattle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Freitas et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Similarly, <italic>CRYL1</italic> emerged from ROH analyses in Chinese sheep and Garfagnina goats adapted to diverse climates, pointing to a role in environmental resilience (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abied et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Dadousis et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Genes involved in immune and resilience traits also surfaced prominently in SAA-specific ROH. <italic>GJA3, GJB2, GJB6</italic>, and <italic>MAB21L</italic>1 were highlighted in Ugandan goat breeds under selection for adaptability and in the Boer breed, <italic>GJB2</italic> and <italic>GJA3</italic> are indicated as candidate genes associated with production traits, such as body size and growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Onzima et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The genomic region harbouring <italic>GJA3, GJB2</italic>, and <italic>GJB6</italic> also represents a selection signature previously identified in the Garfagnina goat breed.</p>
<p>Additional genes previously identified in goats include <italic>UBAP1</italic>, which is associated with a QTL for cannon bone circumference (QTL ID 314136), suggesting a role in skeletal development, and <italic>ZDHHC1</italic>, which overlaps with QTLs for somatic cell score (QTL IDs 296969 and 296970), indicating its potential involvement in udder health and mastitis resistance in caprine production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study provides a snapshot of the genetic landscape of Alpine dairy goats (CAM and SAA) raised under commercial and semi-extensive systems in Lombardy, using SNP chip genotypes from a large number of individuals. By integrating genome-wide SNP data with ROH-based inbreeding and population structure analyses, we reveal insights of direct relevance for herd management and conservation. Despite historical selection pressures, overall genetic diversity remains within acceptable ranges, particularly in CAM, reflecting effective management strategies that preserve variability even without formal pedigree control. However, marked differences emerge across herds, shaped by specific reproductive histories and decisions. In SAA, the introduction of Dutch genetics increased heterozygosity and ROH variability, supporting productivity in the short term but potentially diluting original lines and threatening long-term resilience. ROH islands shared across or specific to breeds pointed to candidate genes for stress adaptation, metabolism, fertility, and immune response, traits crucial for sustainable production. This work highlights the need to integrate genomic tools into herd monitoring.</p>
<p>In conclusion, balancing productivity and genetic diversity is feasible through data-informed decisions. Genotyping all herd animals provides actionable information to improve reproductive efficiency, preserve genetic resources, and ensure the long-term sustainability of Alpine goat farming in Lombardy.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article and its <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Material</bold></xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p></sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal studies were approved by All procedures adhered to European and Italian legislation (2010/63/EU Directive and Legislative Decree No. 26/2014) and received approval from the Animal Welfare Body of the Universit&#xe0; degli Studi di Milano (OPBA) as well as the Italian Ministry of Health (protocol number OPBA_68_2023). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.</p></sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>CF: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. CP: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. AD: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. RM: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. AB: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. MGS: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p></sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors gratefully acknowledge the farmer.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. Generative AI (ChatGPT, OpenAI) was used to improve English grammar and language clarity during manuscript preparation.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors&#xa0;and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<sec id="s13" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2025.1664380/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fanim.2025.1664380/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="SupplementaryFile1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Abied</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sahlu</surname> <given-names>B. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ahbara</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide analysis revealed homozygosity and demographic history of five Chinese sheep breeds adapted to different environments</article-title>. <source>Genes (Basel)</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1480</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/genes11121480</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33317115</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Agradi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Menchetti</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Curone</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Faustini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vigo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Villa</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Comparison of female verzaschese and camosciata delle alpi goats&#x2019; hematological parameters in the context of adaptation to local environmental conditions in semi-extensive systems in Italy</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1703</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12131703</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35804602</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Alexander</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Novembre</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lange</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). 
<article-title>Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>1655</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1664</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.094052.109</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19648217</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Amiri Ghanatsaman</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ayatolahi Mehrgardi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Asadollahpour Nanaei</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Esmailizadeh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Comparative genomic analysis uncovers candidate genes related with milk production and adaptive traits in goat breeds</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>8722</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-023-35973-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37253766</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>An</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Analysis of differentially expressed genes in ovaries of polytocous versus monotocous dairy goats using suppressive subtractive hybridization</article-title>. <source>Reprod. Domest. Anim.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>498</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>503</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01910.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21955105</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>AssoNaPa</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <source>Associazione Nazionale della Pastorizia</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.assonapa.it">https://www.assonapa.it</uri> (Accessed <date-in-citation content-type="access-date">October 2, 2025</date-in-citation>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Atlija</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Arranz</surname> <given-names>J.-J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Martinez-Valladares</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guti&#xe9;rrez-Gil</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Detection and replication of QTL underlying resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes in adult sheep using the ovine 50K SNP array</article-title>. <source>Genet. Selection Evol.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <elocation-id>4</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12711-016-0182-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26791855</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Battaglini</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <source>L&#x2019;allevamento ovino e caprino nelle Alpi</source> (
<publisher-name>Tra valenze ecoculturali e sostenibilit&#xe0; economica</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.sozooalp.it/fileadmin/superuser/Quaderni/quaderno_4/Quaderno_SZA4_Completo.pd">https://www.sozooalp.it/fileadmin/superuser/Quaderni/quaderno_4/Quaderno_SZA4_Completo.pd</uri>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Benedetti del Rio</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mancin</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Orsi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mantovani</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sturaro</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Genomic characterisation of local sheep breeds of the Eastern Alps</article-title>. <source>Ital J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>1528</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1541</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1828051X.2025.2515271</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bertolini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cardoso</surname> <given-names>T. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marras</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nicolazzi</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rothschild</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Amills</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide patterns of homozygosity provide clues about the population history and adaptation of goats</article-title>. <source>Genet. Sel. Evol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>59</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12711-018-0424-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30449279</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Biscarini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cozzi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gaspa</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marras</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>detectRUNS: an R package to detect runs of runs of homozygosity and heterozygosity in diploid genomes</source> (
<publisher-name>IBBA-CNR, PTP, Universit&#xe0; degli Studi di Sassari, University of Guelph</publisher-name>), <fpage>01</fpage>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/detectRUNS/vignettes/detectRUNS.vignette.html">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/detectRUNS/vignettes/detectRUNS.vignette.html</uri>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Brito</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kijas</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ventura</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sargolzaei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Porto-Neto</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>C&#xe1;novas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Genetic diversity and signatures of selection in various goat breeds revealed by genome-wide SNP markers</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-017-3610-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28288562</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chessari</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Criscione</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marletta</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Crepaldi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Portolano</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Manunza</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Characterization of heterozygosity-rich regions in Italian and worldwide goat breeds</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-023-49125-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38168531</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Cortellari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Barbato</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Talenti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bionda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ciampolini</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>a). 
<article-title>The climatic and genetic heritage of Italian goat breeds with genomic SNP data</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>10986</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-89900-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34040003</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Cortellari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bionda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Negro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Frattini</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mastrangelo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Somenzi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>b). 
<article-title>Runs of homozygosity in the Italian goat breeds: Impact of management practices in low-input systems</article-title>. <source>Genet. Selection Evol.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12711-021-00685-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34895134</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dadousis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cecchi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ablondi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fabbri</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stella</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bozzi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Keep Garfagnina alive. An integrated study on patterns of homozygosity, genomic inbreeding, admixture and breed traceability of the Italian Garfagnina goat breed</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>16</volume>, <elocation-id>e0232436</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0232436</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33449925</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Understanding the regulatory mechanisms of milk production using integrative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses: improving inefficient utilization of crop by-products as forage in dairy industry</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>403</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-018-4808-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29843597</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dixit</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ganguly</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhatia</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide runs of homozygosity revealed selection signatures in bos indicus</article-title>. <source>Front. Genet.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>92</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2020.00092</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32153647</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Doekes</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Veerkamp</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bijma</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de Jong</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hiemstra</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Windig</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Inbreeding depression due to recent and ancient inbreeding in Dutch Holstein&#x2013;Friesian dairy cattle</article-title>. <source>Genet. Selection Evol.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12711-019-0497-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31558150</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Freitas</surname> <given-names>P. H. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Schenkel</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Genetic diversity and signatures of selection for thermal stress in cattle and other two Bos species adapted to divergent climatic conditions</article-title>. <source>Front. Genet.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>604823</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2021.604823</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33613634</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ghoreishifar</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Eriksson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Johansson</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khansefid</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Moghaddaszadeh-Ahrabi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Parna</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Signatures of selection reveal candidate genes involved in economic traits and cold acclimation in five Swedish cattle breeds</article-title>. <source>Genet. Selection Evol.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12711-020-00571-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32887549</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Morton</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Collins</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). 
<article-title>Extended tracts of homozygosity in outbred human populations</article-title>. <source>Hum. Mol. Genet.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>789</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>795</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hmg/ddi493</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16436455</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Grilz-Seger</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mesari&#x10d;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cotman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Neuditschko</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Druml</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Brem</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Runs of homozygosity and population history of three horse breeds with small population size</article-title>. <source>J. Equine Vet. Sci.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jevs.2018.09.004</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hillestad</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Woolliams</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Boison</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Grove</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meuwissen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>V&#xe5;ge</surname> <given-names>D. I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Klemetsdal</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Detection of runs of homozygosity in Norwegian Red: Density, criteria and genotyping quality control</article-title>. <source>Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A&#x2014;Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>107&#x2013;116</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Reecy</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Bringing the Animal QTLdb and CorrDB into the future: Meeting new challenges and providing updated services</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>D956</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D961</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkab1116</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34850103</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Reecy</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Animal QTLdb: An improved database tool for livestock animal QTL/association data dissemination in the post-genome era</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>D871</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D879</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gks1150</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23180796</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Visscher</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Goddard</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). 
<article-title>Quantification of inbreeding due to distant ancestors and its detection using dense single nucleotide polymorphism data</article-title>. <source>Genetics.</source> <volume>189</volume>, <page-range>237&#x2013;249</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.111.130922</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21705750</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huson</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wiggans</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Van Tassel</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Crooker</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Effect of artificial selection on runs of homozygosity in U.S. Holstein cattle</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0080813</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24348915</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lawson</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>van Dorp</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Falush</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>A tutorial on how not to over-interpret STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE bar plots</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>3258</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-05257-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30108219</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.-H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>N.-K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>Y.-M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>H.-H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Seong</surname> <given-names>H.-H.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Gene co-expression analysis to characterize genes related to marbling trait in Hanwoo (Korean) cattle</article-title>. <source>Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>19</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5713/ajas.2012.12375</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25049701</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>A. X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Campanile</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Plastow</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide association studies to identify quantitative trait loci affecting milk production traits in water buffalo</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>433</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>444</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2017-13246</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29128211</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Longeri</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zaniboni</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cozzi</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Milanesi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bagnato</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). &#x201c;
<article-title>Animal Bio Arkivi: establishment of a phenotype and tissue repository for farm animals and pets at the University of Milan</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>ASPA congress</source> (
<publisher-name>Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher-name>) Ital. J. Anim. Sci. <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>136</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lopdell</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Littlejohn</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>MATN3 underlies a QTL for stature in cattle</article-title>. <source>New Z. J. Anim. Sci. Production</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Luigi-Sierra</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Delgado</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>&#xc1;lvarez</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Genomic patterns of homozygosity and inbreeding depression in Murciano-Granadina goats</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40104-022-00684-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35264251</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Makino</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rubin</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carneiro</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Axelsson</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Andersson</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Webster</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Elevated proportions of deleterious genetic variation in domestic animals and plants</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>276</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>290</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gbe/evy004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29325102</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Manunza</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ramirez-Diaz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cozzi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lazzari</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tosser-Klopp</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Servin</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Genetic diversity and historical demography of underutilised goat breeds in North-Western Europe</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>20728</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-023-48005-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38007600</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mastrangelo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Di Gerlando</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sardina</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sutera</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Moscarelli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tolone</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide patterns of homozygosity reveal the conservation status in five Italian goat populations</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1510</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11061510</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34071004</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mastrangelo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sardina</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tolone</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Di Gerlando</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sutera</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fontanesi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide identification of runs of homozygosity islands and associated genes in local dairy cattle breeds</article-title>. <source>Animal</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>2480</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2488</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1751731118000629</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29576040</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>McQuillan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Leutenegger</surname> <given-names>A.-L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abdel-Rahman</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Franklin</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pericic</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Barac-Lauc</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). 
<article-title>Runs of homozygosity in European populations</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Hum. Genet.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>359</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>372</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.08.007</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18760389</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>McSweeney</surname> <given-names>P. L. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>McNamara</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>Encyclopedia of Dairy Sciences</source>. <edition>3rd Edn</edition>. (<publisher-loc>Amsterdam, Netherlands</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>Academic Press (Elsevier)</publisher-name>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>M&#xe9;sz&#xe1;rosov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>M&#xe9;sz&#xe1;ros</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Morav&#x10d;&#xed;kov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pavl&#xed;k</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marget&#xed;n</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kasarda</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Within-and between-breed selection signatures in the original and improved Valachian sheep</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1346</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani12111346</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35681809</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nothnagel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kayser</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Krawczak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). 
<article-title>Genomic and geographic distribution of snpdefined runs of homozygosity in Europeans</article-title>. <source>Hum. Mol. Genet.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>2927</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2935</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hmg/ddq198</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20462934</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ojeda-Mar&#xed;n</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guti&#xe9;rrez</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Formoso-Rafferty</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Goyache</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cervantes</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Differential patterns in runs of homozygosity in two mice lines under divergent selection for environmental variability for birth weight</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Breed. Genet.</source> <volume>141</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jbg.12835</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37990938</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Onzima</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Upadhyay</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Doekes</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Brito</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bosse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kanis</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide characterization of selection signatures and runs of homozygosity in Ugandan goat breeds</article-title>. <source>Front. Genet.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>318</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2018.00318</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30154830</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pegolo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bisutti</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mota</surname> <given-names>L. F. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>CecChinato</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Amalfitano</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dettori</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide landscape of genetic diversity, runs of homozygosity, and runs of heterozygosity in five Alpine and Mediterranean goat breeds</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40104-025-01155-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40025542</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Peripolli</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Metzger</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>De Lemos</surname> <given-names>M. V. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stafuzza</surname> <given-names>N. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kluska</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Olivieri</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Autozygosity islands and ROH patterns in Nellore lineages: evidence of selection for functionally important traits</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>680</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-018-5060-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30223795</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Peripolli</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Munari</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lima</surname> <given-names>A. L. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Irgang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baldi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Runs of homozygosity: current knowledge and applications in livestock</article-title>. <source>Anim. Genet.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>271</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/age.12526</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27910110</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Punturiero</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Milanesi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bernini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Delledonne</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bagnato</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Strillacci</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Genomic approach to manage genetic variability in dairy farms</article-title>. <source>Ital J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>769</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>783</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1828051X.2023.2243977</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Purfield</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>McParland</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bradley</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Runs of homozygosity and population history in cattle</article-title>. <source>BMC Genet.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>70</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2156-13-70</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22888858</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<mixed-citation publication-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Regulation (EU) 2016/1012</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>Regulation (EU) 2016/1012</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/1012/oj/eng">https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/1012/oj/eng</uri> (Accessed <date-in-citation content-type="access-date">October 3, 2025</date-in-citation>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sallam</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Reyer</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wimmers</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bertolini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Aboul-Naga</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Braz</surname> <given-names>C. U.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide landscape of runs of homozygosity and differentiation across Egyptian goat breeds</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>573</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-023-09679-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37752425</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Schiavo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bovo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mu&#xf1;oz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ribani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Alves</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ara&#xfa;jo</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Runs of homozygosity provide a genome landscape picture of inbreeding and genetic history of European autochthonous and commercial pig breeds</article-title>. <source>Anim. Genet.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>170</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/age.13045</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33544919</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Senczuk</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mastrangelo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ciani</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Battaglini</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cendron</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ciampolini</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>The genetic heritage of Alpine local cattle breeds using genomic SNP data</article-title>. <source>Genet. Selection Evol.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12711-020-00559-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32664855</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Serranito</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cavalazzi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vidal</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Taurisson-Mouret</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ciani</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Local adaptations of Mediterranean sheep and goats through an integrative approach</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>21363</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-00682-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34725398</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Shannon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Markiel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ozier</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baliga</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ramage</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). 
<article-title>Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>2498</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2504</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.1239303</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14597658</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Strillacci</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vevey</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Blanchet</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mantovani</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sartori</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bagnato</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>The genomic variation in the aosta cattle breeds raised in an extensive alpine farming system</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>2385</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani10122385</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33322839</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Role of aquaporin 3 in reproductive performance of dairy goats after repeated estrus synchronization stimulation</article-title>. <source>Reprod. Domest. Anim.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>851</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>859</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/rda.14358</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37026537</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Szpiech</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pemberton</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Z&#xf6;llner</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rosenberg</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Long runs of homozygosity are enriched for deleterious variation</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Hum. Genet.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>90</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.05.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23746547</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Vostry</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vostra-Vydrova</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Moravcikova</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kasarda</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Margetin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rychtarova</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Genomic analysis of conservation status, population structure, and admixture in local Czech and Slovak dairy goat breeds</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>8205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8222</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2023-24607</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38908686</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Waineina</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ngeno</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Otieno</surname> <given-names>T. O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ilatsia</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure among goat genotypes in Kenya</article-title>. <source>Genetic Resources</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46265/genresj.EQFQ1540</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Welderufael</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>L&#xf8;vendahl</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>De Koning</surname> <given-names>D.-J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Janss</surname> <given-names>L. L. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fikse</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide association study for susceptibility to and recoverability from mastitis in Danish Holstein cows</article-title>. <source>Front. Genet.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>141</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2018.00141</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29755506</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<mixed-citation publication-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wickham</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis</source> (<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org">https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org</uri> (Accessed <date-in-citation content-type="access-date">May 2, 2021</date-in-citation>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wilkinson</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). 
<article-title>ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis by WICKHAM</article-title>. <source>H. Biometrics</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>678</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>679</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01616.x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1949</year>). 
<article-title>The genetical structure of populations</article-title>. <source>Annals of Eugenics</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>323</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>354</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-1809.1949.tb02451.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24540312</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide scan for runs of homozygosity identifies candidate genes in three pig breeds</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>518</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani9080518</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31374971</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guldbrandtsen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bosse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lund</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sahana</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Runs of homozygosity and distribution of functional variants in the cattle genome</article-title>. <source>BMC genomics</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>542</fpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26198692</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zlobin</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Volkova</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zinovieva</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Iolchiev</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bagirov</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Borodin</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Loci associated with negative heterosis for viability and meat productivity in interspecific sheep hybrids</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>184</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani13010184</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36611792</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2180532">Kristopher Irizarry</ext-link>, Western University of Health Sciences, United States</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1391570">Henrique A. Mulim</ext-link>, Purdue University, United States</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2145327">Giorgio Chessari</ext-link>, University of Catania, Italy</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>