Front. Anim. Sci.Frontiers in Animal ScienceFront. Anim. Sci.2673-6225Frontiers Media S.A.10.3389/fanim.2025.1531761Animal ScienceOriginal ResearchComparative evaluation of Acheta domesticus and Hermetia illucens as alternative protein sources for the growth, health, and meat quality of the broilerMustafaFarwa1SajjadAsif1*SajjadMuhammad1†AliMudssar3BashirHafiza Sehrish1AbbasMuhammad Ghazanfar2BinyameenMuhammad2MozūratisRaimondas45*1Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan2Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan3Institute of Plant Protection, Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture Multan, Multan, Pakistan4Laboratory of Chemical and Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology, Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania5Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Edited by: Rayudika Aprilia Patindra Purba, Airlangga University, Indonesia
Reviewed by: Susanne Kreuzer-Redmer, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Introduction
Insects are receiving increasing attention due to their potential to enhance farming efficiency and sustainability, mitigate vast quantities of bio-waste, and improve animal performance. It is hypothesized that replacing soybean meal with Acheta domesticus will improve broiler productive performance, health, and meat quality. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the effect of the gradual replacement of soybean meal (4%, 8%, and 12%) with house cricket (A. domesticus) and black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) on productive performances, hematology, intestinal morphology, and meat quality attributes of male broiler (Ross 308).
Methods
A total of 350 1-day-old chicks (39.23 ± 0.19 g) were divided into seven groups (five pens per group and 10 chicks per pen) following a completely randomized design. The seven groups included 4%, 8%, and 12% SBM replacements with A. domesticus and H. illucens. Soybean meal was the basal diet considered the control.
Results
The broilers fed 12% A. domesticus, or 12% H. illucens had significantly higher ((p 0.05) live weight, average daily weight gain, and improved feed conversion ratio than the broilers fed basal (SBM) diet throughout starter, grower, and finisher phases. Hematology (complete blood count and serum biochemistry traits) and intestinal morphology (villus height, villus width, crypt depth, and villus height-to-crypt depth ratio) of the broilers improved when fed on 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens meals as compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Feeding 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens also had a significant positive impact on the meat quality traits of broilers, such as maximum redness (a*) and yellowness (b*) with minimal cooking loss and lightness (L*) (p < 0.05) than the broilers fed the control diet.
Discussion
Using insect meal as an alternative to traditional feed sources could contribute significantly to the sustainable expansion of the poultry industry.
Soybean meal (SBM) and fish meal (FM) are the predominant protein sources in poultry feed. Still, there is limited land available worldwide for soybean cultivation. Overexploitation of marine resources has led to a significant decline in small pelagic forage fish, which are critical for producing FM and fish oil (Veldkamp et al., 2022). Moreover, the increasing expenses associated with these traditional protein sources posed a threat to the sustainable future of the poultry industry (McMichael and Bambrick, 2005). Furthermore, food insecurity is a pressing issue in numerous developing countries, and there are expected challenges in supplying food for a projected population of over 9 billion people in 2050 (Makkar et al., 2014). This situation has intensified the quest for alternative protein sources to fulfill the nutritional demands of humans and animals.
Insects are emerging as a novel alternative protein source, promoting sustainable growth in the poultry sector (Sánchez-Muros et al., 2014). They have the potential as a standard protein source in animal feedings, i.e., poultry, pigs, and fish, owing to their high-quality protein content (25%–75% on a DM basis) and suitable amino acid composition and fatty acid composition (n-3 FA) (Henry et al., 2015; Kulma et al., 2020; Van Huis, 2013; Veldkamp and Bosch, 2015). Moreover, they have minimal competition with human food resources and are eco-friendly in terms of energy cost, land, and footprints (Ballitoc and Sun, 2013), which makes insects a promising option from an ecological standpoint (Makkar et al., 2014; Oonincx and De Boer, 2012; Sánchez-Muros et al., 2014).
Several types of insects, including black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.), yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.), house fly (Musca domestica L.), mulberry silkworm (Bombyx mori L.), and grasshopper (Caelifera spp.), have been recognized as promising sources of protein to replace conventional protein sources in animal feeds (Van Huis et al., 2013). Free-range birds voluntarily consume insects as a natural protein source (Adetunmbi, 2023; Hwangbo et al., 2009; Ijaiya and Eko, 2009; Khatun et al., 2003; Sajjad et al., 2024a). The nutritional value of insects can oscillate with the species, rearing substrate, development stages, and handling methods (Danieli et al., 2019; Gasco et al., 2020; Slimen et al., 2023). Incorporating insects into poultry feed instead of SBM or FM did not adversely affect the broilers’ growth performances (Adeniji, 2007; Oyegoke et al., 2006; Wang et al., 2005). Moreover, insect meal improves carcass traits in terms of dressing percentage, breast muscle, thigh muscle, slaughter, dressed carcass, and eviscerated weights in broilers (Ballitoc and Sun, 2013; Hwangbo et al., 2009; Khatun et al., 2003; Sajjad et al., 2024b).
Previous studies have demonstrated that the growth performance, blood hematology, gut morphology, and meat quality of broilers (Benzertiha et al., 2019), Japanese quails (Zadeh et al., 2019), and barbary partridges (Loponte et al., 2017) are improved by the inclusion of H. illucens and T. molitor in their diets (Benzertiha et al., 2020; Khan et al., 2018). The growth performance and nitrogen balance of Ross 308 are enhanced with 2.6% H. illucens meal in the starter phase (Neumann et al., 2018). Moreover, meals containing 5% to 7.5% H. illucens improved the feed efficiency and increased thigh weight while reducing meat pH, whereas 10% H. illucens boosted growth in Cobb 500 broiler chickens (Dahiru et al., 2016). Furthermore, it was noted that substituting partial or all of the soybean oil with H. illucens larvae fat had no adverse impact on the growth performance of young turkeys (Sypniewski et al., 2020). The inclusion of 20% H. illucens in the diet of Ross 308 male broilers improved meat quality by elevating levels of lauric acid, myristic acid, and eicosapentaenoic fatty acid, while also slightly decreasing the total polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) content (Vilela et al., 2021). The diet with 5% H. illucens resulted in a decrease in abdominal fat; 10% H. illucens led to an increase in carcass and breast weight, while 15% inclusion of H. illucens increased the body weight, abdominal fat, meat redness, protein content in meat, and the levels of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) in breast meat while reducing PUFA in breast meat (Schiavone et al., 2019). Gut health and functioning are mainly associated with the intestinal morphology of the broilers, which is affected by the dietary protein level and digestibility of the ingested food (Kuzmuk et al., 2005; Laudadio et al., 2012; Qaisrani et al., 2014). Intestinal morphology can be assessed with the development of morphometric indices such as villus height (Vh) and crypt depth (Cd) (Franco et al., 2006; Laudadio et al., 2012).
The poultry industry depends on SBM to meet the demand for protein in animal feeds, as only a few insect species are currently utilized at an industrial scale (Sajid et al., 2023). Therefore, it is a smart choice to focus on local insect species as substantial feed ingredients in animal sectors (Sajjad et al., 2024c).
The house cricket (Acheta domesticus L.) (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) has been utilized globally as feed for insectivores (Kulma et al., 2019) because of its high protein content (60%–70% dry weight) with all essential amino acids and 10%–23% lipids (Udomsil et al., 2019). Moreover, it has high levels of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids and minerals such as P, Na, and Ca (Han and Heinonen, 2022; Oonincx and Finke, 2021). Furthermore, it can potentially transform organic wastes, including food scrap and agricultural by-products, into nutritious biomass that is beneficial for animal feeds, particularly for poultry and aquaculture (Van Peer et al., 2021). Cricket farming generates high-quality by-products, which can be used as organic fertilizer (Halloran et al., 2017). Furthermore, the European Union has recently authorized the inclusion of H. illucens, M. domestica, T. molitor, Alphitobius diaperinus, A. domesticus, Gryllodes sigillatus, and Gryllus assimilis as a protein source in poultry and pig feed (Schiavone and Castillo, 2024); however, there is limited information regarding the effects of partial replacement of SBM with A. domesticus on the productive performance, health, and meat quality traits of Ross 308 broiler. It is hypothesized that the replacement of SBM with A. domesticus will improve broiler productive performance, health, and meat quality. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of replacing 4%, 8%, and 12% SBM with A. domesticus and H. illucens on the productive performance, hematology, intestinal morphology, and meat quality of broiler chickens.
Materials and methodsInstitutional review board
The biological trials on broiler Ross 308 were carried out for 35 days under controlled conditions in A block, University of Animal and Veterinary Sciences (UVAS), Ravi Campus, Pattoki, Lahore, Pakistan. The Ethical Review Committee (No. DR/495) at UVAS approved all the procedures.
Insects
Initially, house crickets (A. domesticus) were collected using an aerial net from neglected kitchens of homes and hotels, and then the stock culture on chicken waste was established, while black soldier flies H. illucens were also obtained from the established culture under controlled conditions (28°C ± 2°C, relative humidity 65% ± 5%, and 16 h light:8 h dark) at the Department of Entomology, the Islamia University of Bahawalpur. Mature larvae of H. illucens (18 days old) and adult A. domesticus (70 days old) were harvested from the chicken waste and boiled at 100°C for 3 min to ensure they were killed, and feed and fecal remnants were removed and subsequently oven-dried at 60°C for 24 h (Tan et al., 2018). The dried insects were ground in a blender and stored at −20°C. The larvae of A. domesticus and H. illucens were analyzed for their nutritional compositions, energy contents, and amino acids (% on DM basis) using proximate analyses and an amino acid analyzer at the Department of Animal Nutrition at UVAS (Table 1).
The nutrients, energy contents, and amino acids of H. illucens and A. domesticus larvae.
Nutrients (%)a
H. illucens
A. domesticus
Dry matter
90.34
92.00
Crude protein
41.23
49.00
Ether extracts
31.00
11.20
Ash
11.00
5.60
Crude fiber
9.70
9.34
Nitrogen free extract (NFE)
5.50
22.00
Calcium
2.15
0.90
Phosphorus available
0.90
0.45
Energy levels (kcal/kg)
H. illucens
A. domesticus
Gross energy
4,948
4,320
Metabolizable energyb
1,474
1,294
Essential amino acid (%)
H. illucens
A. domesticus
Arginine
2.31
4.82
Lysine
3.23
6.45
Methionine
1.28
2.27
Threonine
1.82
3.38
Leucine
3.08
6.82
Isoleucine
2.64
3.75
Valine
3.18
4.16
Dispensable amino acid (%)
H. illucens
A. domesticus
Cysteine
0.43
3.40
Tryptophan
0.30
1.42
Glycine
3.10
3.20
Glutamic acid
11.20
11.00
Proline
2.92
2.27
Tyrosine
3.27
3.08
Phenylalanine
4.27
3.10
All the analyses of each sample were replicated three times.
Metabolizable energy (M.E.) was estimated by following Ravindran et al. (2014).
Experimentation
Male Ross 308 was used to assess the impacts of 4%, 8%, and 12% substitution of SBM with A. domesticus and H. illucens. A total of 350 1-day-old chicks (39.23 ± 0.19 g) were allotted to seven dietary treatment groups, with five pens per treatment and 10 birds per pen. The birds were placed in spotless and disinfected pens equipped with feeders, drinkers, heat lamps, and bedding materials (3 to 4 inches of rice husk). The chicks had ad libitum feed, water, and light. Temperature was maintained at 35°C during the initial week, subsequently adjusting to 28 ± 2°C till the completion of experiments, while the relative humidity was kept at 50% ± 5%. The photoperiod was maintained at 8 h of light and 6 h of darkness using artificial lighting. The birds were vaccinated for numerous diseases as per the set protocols by the veterinarian. Enclosures were inspected daily to assess clinical signs and record any mortality among the birds.
Formulation
SBM was progressively substituted at the levels of 4%, 8%, and 12% with A. domesticus and H. illucens by following the guidelines at the levels of Ross (2022). All the dietary treatments were formulated into three different phases, i.e., starter (1–10 d), grower (11–24 d), and finisher (25–35 d). Ingredients, along with the calculated and analyzed profiles of the starter, grower, and finisher meals, are presented in Tables 2–4.
The ingredients, chemical compositions, and energy contents of starter meals.
Ingredients (%)
Starter meal
Cont.
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
Corn grain
51.17
51.93
54.35
55.57
52.67
54.40
55.28
Wheat bran
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
3.28
3.20
Rice polishing
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.75
Soybean oil
4.00
3.00
1.80
0.80
3.00
2.50
2.40
Soybean meala
28.50
25.00
21.00
17.00
24.07
19.65
15.2
Fish mealb
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
HI and AD meals
–
4.00
8.00
12.00
4.00
8.00
12.00
L-Lysine HCl
0.03
–
–
–
–
–
–
DL-Methionine
0.15
0.12
0.10
0.07
0.10
0.04
0.07
Common salt
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
Limestone
1.75
1.55
1.35
1.16
1.34
1.32
1.30
Vitamin premixc
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.47
0.46
0.45
Micro min premixd
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Nutrients (%)
Cont.
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
Dry matter
89.40
89.40
89.50
89.40
89.32
89.50
89.40
Crude protein
23.00
23.03
23.00
22.98
23.02
23.00
22.99
Ether extracts
6.65
6.72
6.80
6.86
6.56
6.56
6.61
Ash
4.06
4.22
4.27
4.36
4.24
4.29
4.36
Crude fiber
3.62
3.85
3.96
3.80
3.60
3.72
3.71
Nitrogen-free extract (NFE)
61.00
60.98
60.84
60.94
61.51
61.36
61.31
Calcium
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.95
Phosphorus available
0.51
0.51
0.52
0.52
0.51
0.52
0.52
Lysine
1.32
1.32
1.33
1.33
1.32
1.33
1.33
Methionine
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
0.55
Threonine
0.88
0.89
0.90
0.90
0.89
0.90
0.90
Valine
1.03
1.04
1.03
1.04
1.04
1.03
1.04
Arginine
1.41
1.41
1.42
1.40
1.41
1.42
1.40
Leucine
1.46
1.46
1.44
1.45
1.46
1.44
1.45
Isoleucine
0.88
0.89
0.88
0.89
0.89
0.88
0.89
Energy levels (kcal/kg)
Cont.
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
Gross energy
4,606
4,593
4,598
4,604
4,596
4,598
4,604
Metabolizable energye
2,980
2,978
2,973
2,974
2,978
2,973
2,973
Crude protein contents of soybean meal was 45% according to (DM basis).
Crude protein contents of soybean meal was 66% according to (DM basis). Cont., Control; HI4, 4% H. illucens; HI8, 8% H. illucens; HI12, 12% H. illucens; AD4, 4% A. domesticus; AD8, 8% A. domesticus; AD12, 12% A. domesticus.
Metabolizable energy was calculated by following Ravindran et al. (2014) while all other ingredients had been analyzed. HI, Hermetia illucens; AD, Acheta domesticus.
The ingredients, chemical compositions, and energy contents of grower meals (% as fed).
Ingredients (%)
Grower meal
Cont.
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
Corn grain
53.57
55.14
56.94
58.44
55.46
57.20
58.80
Wheat bran
5.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
5.00
4.00
3.25
Rice polishing
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
Soybean oil
4.53
3.30
2.30
1.90
3.50
3.15
2.80
Soybean meal
26.00
22.00
18.30
14.50
21.20
16.90
12.47
Fish meal
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
HI and AD meals
–
4.00
8.00
12.00
4.00
8.00
12.00
DL-Methionine
0.14
0.11
0.09
0.06
0.07
0.02
–
Common salt
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
Limestone
1.36
1.05
0.97
0.70
1.05
1.03
1.01
Vitamin premixa
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.37
0.35
0.32
Micro min premixb
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Nutrients (%)
Cont.
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
Dry matter
89.40
89.30
89.50
89.40
89.30
89.50
89.40
Crude protein
21.51
21.50
21.52
21.50
21.50
21.52
21.50
Ether extract
7.06
7.08
7.10
7.14
7.00
7.00
6.99
Crude fiber
4.06
4.18
4.27
4.31
4.15
4.17
4.19
Ash
3.37
3.55
3.68
3.81
3.44
3.55
3.65
Nitrogen-free extract (NFE)
62.16
62.20
61.89
61.13
62.67
62.68
62.46
Calcium
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
Phosphorus available
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.43
Lysine
1.18
1.17
1.20
1.18
1.19
1.19
1.19
Methionine
0.50
0.52
0.52
0.49
0.51
0.51
0.51
Threonine
0.80
0.81
0.79
0.80
0.79
0.79
0.79
Valine
0.90
0.91
0.90
0.92
0.92
0.91
0.92
Arginine
1.28
1.27
1.29
1.28
1.27
1.28
1.27
Leucine
1.29
1.28
1.30
1.31
1.30
1.31
1.30
Isoleucine
0.80
0.82
0.81
0.82
0.81
0.80
0.80
Energy levels (kcal/kg)
Cont.
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
Gross energy
4,663
4,659
4,664
4,671
4,659
4,643
4,645
Metabolizable energyc
3,055
3,049
3,048
3,051
3,049
3,048
3,051
Cont., Control; HI4, 4% H. illucens; HI8, 8% H. illucens; HI12, 12% H. illucens; AD4, 4% A. domesticus; AD8, 8% A. domesticus; AD12, 12% A. domesticus.
Metabolizable energy was calculated by following Ravindran et al. (2014) while all other ingredients had been analyzed. HI, Hermetia illucens; AD, Acheta domesticus.
The ingredients, chemical compositions, and energy contents of finisher meals (% as fed).
Ingredients (%)
Finisher meal
Cont.
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
Corn grain
57.22
58.60
60.94
63.18
59
61.06
62.90
Wheat bran
5.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
5.00
4.25
3.24
Rice polishing
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
Soybean oil
5.52
4.33
3.23
2.03
4.80
4.10
3.70
Soybean meal
22.50
18.50
14.50
10.70
17.54
13.02
8.65
Fish meal
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
HI and AD meals
–
4.00
8.00
12.00
4.00
8.00
12.00
L-Lysine HCl
0.04
–
–
–
–
–
–
DL-Methionine
0.14
0.06
–
0.06
0.07
0.02
–
Common salt
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
Limestone
1.15
1.15
1.15
0.60
0.91
0.90
0.88
Vitamin premixa
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.32
0.3
0.28
Micro min premixb
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Total
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Nutrients (%)
Cont.
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
Dry matter
89.45
89.20
89.40
89.50
89.30
89.60
89.50
Crude protein
19.52
19.57
19.48
19.52
19.52
19.72
19.53
Ether extract
8.06
8.10
8.13
8.13
8.02
8.02
8.02
Crude fiber
4.00
4.02
4.10
4.10
4.00
4.08
4.04
Ash
3.48
3.50
3.51
3.57
3.46
3.44
3.51
Nitrogen-free extract
63.80
63.70
63.55
63.40
64.26
64.24
64.15
Calcium
0.64
0.67
0.65
0.66
0.66
0.65
0.66
Phosphorus available
0.34
0.35
0.38
0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
Lysine
1.10
1.08
1.07
1.08
1.08
1.09
1.08
Methionine
0.50
0.48
0.49
0.48
0.48
0.48
0.48
Threonine
0.70
0.71
0.74
0.72
0.72
0.72
0.72
Valine
0.80
0.82
0.85
0.85
0.84
0.84
0.85
Arginine
1.20
1.17
1.18
1.18
1.18
1.17
1.18
Leucine
1.18
1.20
1.19
1.20
1.19
1.19
1.20
Isoleucine
0.78
0.73
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.76
0.75
Energy levels (kcal/kg)
Cont.
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
Gross energy
4,738
4,733
4,723
4,713
4,723
4,721
4,716
Metabolizable energyc
3,128
3,120
3,100
3,102
3,111
3,105
3,104
Cont., Control; HI4, 4% H. illucens; HI8, 8% H. illucens; HI12, 12% H. illucens; AD4, 4% A. domesticus; AD8, 8% A. domesticus; AD12, 12% A. domesticus.
Metabolizable energy was calculated by following Ravindran et al. (2014) while all other ingredients had been analyzed. HI, Hermetia illucens; AD, Acheta domesticus.
Productive performances
Bird’s performances, such as live weight (LW), average daily weight gain (ADG), daily feed intake (DFI), and feed conversion ratio (FCR), were calculated over a 35-day feeding period. The LW was recorded individually at the onset of the experiment and subsequently at intervals of 10 d, 24 d, and 35 d. Daily weight gain and feed intake were determined on both individual and pen bases following each growth phase, whereas the feed conversion ratio was calculated for each growth phase and for the intact intervals of the trial.
Hematology
On day 35, two chicks per pen were euthanized shortly after their arrival by a skilled professional using the rapid decapitation technique. Consequently, 2.5 mL of blood was collected into EDTA and serum-separating tubes. Hematology and serum biochemistry parameters were tested by following Campbell (1995).
Intestinal morphology
The small tissues (2–3 mm) from jejunum (JE) and ileum (IL) sites were excised from the slain birds, promptly washed with normal saline, and stored for 72 h in 10% formalin solution by following Laudadio et al. (2012). The transverse sections were studied by taking images under a light microscope, and villus height (Vh), villus width (Vw), crypt depth (Cd), and Vh/Cd were determined by the ImageJ software (Ferreira and Rasband, 2012).
Meat quality
Pectoralis major was used to evaluate meat quality parameters such as meat pH, drip loss, cooking loss, shear force, and meat color, including lightness (L*), redness (a*), yellowness (b*), chroma (C*), and hue (H*) from the broiler. The deboned meat samples were refrigerated at 4°C overnight before the analyses. Cooking and drip losses were assessed as described by Kaić et al. (2021) and Zaid et al. (2020). Meat pH was tested using pH meter 3210 SET 2 from breast samples. The CR-410 colorimeter was used to determine meat color by following Priolo et al. (2002). The breast meat was cut into a rectangular shape (1 H × 1 W × 2 L, in cm) parallel to muscle fibers using a scalpel handle blade. TAXT plus 100C texture analyzer was used to assess the Warner–Bratzler shear force (N/cm2) with the help of a V-slot blade. These analyses were carried out from UVAS, Lahore.
Statistical analysis
The pens served as the trial units for assessing productive performances, while individual birds were used to determine hematology, intestinal morphology, and meat characteristics. The significant differences among the treatment groups were analyzed using a completely randomized design (CRD) with a one-way analysis of variance followed by the Duncan Multiple Range (DMR). Significant statistical differences were accepted at p < 0.05, while values in the range of 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 were considered to indicate a trend. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were used to assess the linear and quadratic effects. A general linear model (GLM) was performed to assess the impacts of dietary groups, intestinal sections, and their interactions. All the analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 21 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
ResultsProductive performances
The productive performances, i.e., live weight, average daily weight gain, daily feed intake, and feed conversion ratio of the broilers fed with different meals, are summarized in Table 5. These parameters significantly differ (p < 0.05) among all the dietary treatments except for the daily feed intake (p > 0.05) across the feeding intervals. In starter and finisher phases, the LW was the highest in 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens and the lowest in the control treatment. It was the maximum in 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens and the minimum in 4% H. illucens in the grower phase. The LW was affected in a linear and quadratic manner among the H. illucens meals during the starter and finisher phases, while a linear response was seen during the grower phase. Similarly, LW responded linearly and quadratically to the A. domesticus meals during the feeding intervals.
Impacts of H. illucens and A. domesticus dietary groups on the productive performances of broilers.
Item
Control
Hermetia illucens
Acheta domesticus
PSEM
p-value
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
ANOVA
HI Lin.
HI Quad.
AD Lin.
AD Quad.
Live weight, g
DOC
38.88
39.19
38.98
39.56
39.00
40.03
39.38
0.78
0.714
0.326
0.876
0.648
0.743
10 d
246.16g
258.60f
276.85d
303.33b
262.67e
297.80c
318.83a
5.53
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
24 d
1,027.33cd
969.33d
1,079.83bc
1,170.83ab
1,071.16bc
1,105.67bc
1,218.5a
20.69
<0.001
0.014
0.574
<0.001
<0.001
35 d
1,901.03f
1,960.95e
2,059.75c
2,158.90a
1,974.15d
2,126.44b
2,151.77a
21.39
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Average daily weight gain, g
1–10 d
24.62g
25.86f
27.68d
30.33b
26.26e
29.78c
31.88a
0.55
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
11–24 d
55.79bc
49.46c
54.84bc
62.35ab
60.21ab
58.65ab
64.26a
1.27
0.007
0.039
0.685
<0.001
<0.001
25–35 d
79.42b
80.10b
84.84b
98.88a
78.95b
86.87b
99.12a
2.04
<0.001
0.002
0.907
<0.001
<0.001
1–35 d
53.28e
54.87d
58.75c
61.35a
55.14d
59.67b
60.32b
0.65
<0.001
<0.001
0.114
<0.001
<0.001
Daily feed intake, g
1–10 d
23.45
22.28
23.62
22.30
22.86
23.37
22.3
0.38
0.312
0.297
0.875
0.297
0.612
11–24 d
95.83
92.61
95.84
95.88
94.66
94.66
92.26
1.23
0.089
0.265
0.089
0.135
0.218
25–35 d
176.28
174.67
174.47
177.67
178.33
178.67
178.00
2.43
0.167
0.344
0.125
0.304
0.592
1–35 d
98.52
96.53
97.98
98.62
98.62
98.90
97.52
1.17
0.227
0.507
0.126
0.590
0.295
Feed conversion ratio, g/g
1–10 d
0.95a
0.86b
0.85b
0.78c
0.87b
0.73bc
0.69c
0.02
<0.001
<0.001
0.325
<0.001
0.001
11–24 d
1.99a
1.74ab
1.57bc
1.72bc
1.57bc
1.52bc
1.43c
0.05
0.008
0.032
0.652
<0.001
0.041
25–35 d
2.26a
2.18ab
2.09ab
1.80c
2.21ab
2.05b
1.78c
0.04
<0.001
<0.001
0.741
<0.001
0.002
1–35 d
1.63a
1.54b
1.54b
1.42c
1.56b
1.45c
1.41c
0.02
<0.001
<0.001
0.405
<0.001
<0.001
DOC, day-old chick; HI4, 4% H. illucens; HI8, 8% H. illucens; HI12, 12% H. illucens; AD4, 4% A. domesticus; AD8, 8% A. domesticus; AD12, 12% A. domesticus; PSEM, pooled standard error of the mean; ANOVA, analysis of variance; orthogonal polynomial contrast. HI lin., H. illucens linear; HI quad., H. illucens quadratic; AD lin., A. domesticus linear; AD quad., A. domesticus quadratic. Values marked with different superscripts within a row differed significantly (p < 0.05).
During days 1–10, daily weight gain was the maximum in 12% A. domesticus and the minimum in the control group. During days 11–24, it was the highest in 12% A. domesticus and the lowest in 4% H. illucens. Similarly, maximum ADG was found in meals containing 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens on days 25–35, and the minimum was found in the remaining treatments, whereas the highest daily weight gain was recorded in 12% H. illucens and the lowest in the control group. Polynomial contrast presented linear and quadratic effects in ADG during days 1–10, while a linear response was seen during the remaining feeding periods among the meals of H. illucens; likewise, there were linear and quadratic effects in ADG across the feeding periods among the A. domesticus meals.
The maximum FCR was registered in the broilers fed the control meal, while the minimum was registered when fed the 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens across the feeding intervals. The H. illucens meals affected FCR in a way across the feeding periods. Likewise, there were linear and quadratic effects in FCR across the intervals among the A. domesticus meals.
HematologyComplete blood count
Hematology and serum biochemistry traits are mentioned in Table 6. The hematological parameters showed statistical differences (p < 0.05) among all the treatments except for monocytes (p > 0.05). The maximum hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cells (RBCs), hematocrits (HCT), platelets, total leucocytes (TLC), and lymphocytes (Lyn) were registered in 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens and the minimum values were registered in 4% H. illucens. Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were the highest in 12% A. domesticus and the lowest in the control group. HB, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, TLC, heterocysts, and lymphocytes showed linear and quadratic responses, while a quadratic response to the H. illucens meals was found in RBCs and platelets. Similarly, HB, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, platelets, and TLC were affected linearly and quadratically, while heterocysts and lymphocytes responded linearly to the A. domesticus meals.
Effects of H. illucens and A. domesticus meals on the hematology and serum biochemistry traits of broilers.
Trait
Control
Hermetia illucens
Acheta domesticus
PSEM
p-value
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
ANOVA
HI Lin.
HI Quad.
AD Lin.
AD Quad.
Hematology
HB
10.00c
8.33f
8.90e
11.20b
9.76c
9.90c
12.30a
0.88
<0.001
<0.001
0.027
<0.001
<0.001
RBCs
3.13b
2.57c
2.87bc
3.67a
2.83bc
3.03b
3.56a
0.28
<0.001
0.175
0.041
0.020
0.003
HCT
30.07e
26.63f
35.73b
39.56a
35.30c
32.36d
39.53a
1.19
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
MCV
83.17f
89.79e
109.27c
113.83b
98.06d
109.36c
115.60a
2.60
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.005
<0.001
MCH
25.73f
29.50e
34.23c
36.13b
31.76d
34.23c
37.66a
0.98
<0.001
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
MCHC
30.30d
32.73c
33.33b
33.67b
32.43c
33.23b
35.33a
0.64
<0.001
0.017
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Platelets
24,000.00c
13,033.33f
13,966.67e
24,966.67b
14,666.66e
16,666.67d
27,000.00a
1,226
< 0.001
0.083
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
TLC
18,066.67c
7,542.28f
11,000.00d
21,000.00b
10,066.37e
17,466.67c
23,000.00a
1,275
< 0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Heter.
36.67d
40.19c
53.33ab
52.66ab
44.33c
50.33b
55.67a
1.69
<0.001
<0.001
0.046
0.027
0.549
Lyn.
44.67b
33.67d
40.59c
56.33a
40.66c
43.33bc
56.66a
1.80
<0.001
<0.001
0.003
<0.001
0.084
Mono.
1.99
1.99
2.00
2.00
1.99
1.99
2.00
0.14
0.469
0.678
0.841
0.932
0.459
Serum biochemistry
T. protein
2.73c
2.83bc
3.20ab
3.33a
3.23ab
3.13abc
3.36a
0.06
0.001
0.004
0.002
0.511
0.03
Glob.
1.13c
1.33b
1.90ab
1.93ab
1.43b
1.63ab
2.16a
0.03
0.006
0.639
0.011
0.077
0.009
Alb.
1.20c
1.30bc
1.50ab
1.50ab
1.40abc
1.30bc
1.60a
0.07
0.003
0.015
0.789
0.002
0.487
Uric acid
4.13a
4.13a
3.93ab
3.53bc
3.63bc
3.86abc
3.43c
0.06
0.004
0.035
0.042
0.011
0.042
Cholesterol
154.33a
152.67a
140.33b
124.33c
152.67a
136.33b
120.33c
2.92
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Glucose
212.67a
212.33a
201.33b
162.67d
175.33c
196.33b
135.67e
2.78
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Creatinine
0.53a
0.53a
0.43ab
0.33bc
0.40abc
0.43ab
0.23c
0.03
0.007
0.011
0.011
0.697
0.008
Traits are as follows: Hb g/dL, hemoglobin; RBCs × 106/µL, red blood cells; HCT %, hematocrits; MCV fL, mean corpuscular volume; MCH pg, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; Platelets/µL; TLC × 103/µL, total leucocytes; Heter. (%), heterophils; Lym. (%), lymphocytes; Mono. (%), monocytes; T. protein g/dL, total protein; Glob. g/dL, globulin; Alb. g/dL, albumin; Uric acid g/dL; Cholesterol mg/dL; Glucose mg/dL; Creatinine mg/dL. HI4, 4% H. illucens; HI8, 8% H. illucens; HI12, 12% H. illucens; AD4, 4% A. domesticus; AD8, 8% A. domesticus; AD12, 12% A. domesticus; PSEM, pooled standard error of the mean; ANOVA, analysis of variance; orthogonal polynomial contrast; HI lin., H. illucens linear; HI quad., H. illucens quadratic; AD lin., A. domesticus linear; SF quad., A. domesticus quadratic. Values marked with different superscript within a row were significantly different (p < 0.05).
Serum biochemistry
The serum biochemistry traits differed statistically (p < 0.05) among the meals. Total protein, globulin, and albumin were the highest in the broilers fed 12% A. domesticus, while they were the lowest in the control meals. The maximum concentrations of uric acid, cholesterol, glucose, and creatinine were found in the control group, and the minimum concentrations were found in 12% A. domesticus meals. The orthogonal contrast depicted linear and quadratic responses in total protein, uric acid, cholesterol, glucose, and creatinine, while a quadratic effect in globulin and a linear effect in albumin were seen among H. illucens meals. Likewise, total protein, globulin, and creatinine registered a quadratic effect; albumin showed a linear response, while uric acid, cholesterol, and glucose presented linear and quadratic effects among A. domesticus meals.
Intestinal morphology
The dietary treatments, sites of the small intestine, and their interactions differed statistically (p < 0.05) (Table 7). The Vh was the longest and similar at the jejunum and ileum when broilers were fed 12% A. domesticus, and at the jejunum site fed 12% H. illucens, 8% H. illucens, and 8% AD, while it was the shortest at the ileum site in the broilers fed the control diet and 4% H. illucens (Figure 1A). The highest Cd was observed at the jejunum in those fed the control diet and the lowest at the ileum site in those fed 12% A. domesticus (Figure 1B). The Vw was the largest and comparable at both sites when fed 12% A. domesticus, and at the jejunum site when fed 12% H. illucens, 8% H. illucens, and 8% A. domesticus, while it was the smallest at the jejunum and ileum sites in the broilers fed the control diet, 4% H. illucens, and 4% A. domesticus and at the ileum site in the broilers fed 8% H. illucens and 8% A. domesticus (Figure 1C). Vh/Cd was the largest and similar at the jejunum and ileum sites in the broilers fed 12% A. domesticus, and at the jejunum site in the broilers fed 12% H. illucens, 8% H. illucens, and 8% A. domesticus. The lowest Vh/Cd ratios were recorded in the control and 4% H. illucens (Figure 1D).
The impact of dietary treatments, intestinal sites, and their interactions on the gut morphometric indices.
Index
Fixed factors
df
F-value
p-value
Villus height (µm)
Meals
6
58.91
<0.001
Intestinal sites
1
187.21
<0.001
Meals × intestinal sites
6
4.11
0.002
Villus width (µm)
Meals
6
5.32
<0.001
Intestinal sites
1
37.33
<0.001
Meals × intestinal sites
6
17.16
<0.001
Crypt depth (µm)
Meals
6
156.54
<0.001
Intestinal sites
1
406.19
<0.001
Meals × intestinal sites
6
20.74
<0.001
Villus height/crypt depth (µm)/(µm)
Meals
6
3.42
0.006
Intestinal sites
1
54.67
<0.001
Meals × intestinal sites
6
3.50
0.002
Interactions between intestinal sites and dietary treatments; villus height (A), crypt depth (B), villus width (C), and villus height/crypt depth ratio (D). Values marked with different letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Meat quality
Meat quality traits are presented in Table 8. These parameters differed significantly (p < 0.05) among all the dietary treatments except for the drip loss, pH, shear force, and chroma (p > 0.05). In the control treatment, maximum cooking loss and L* were recorded, with the minimum found in the 12% A. domesticus meal. The a* was the highest in 12% A. domesticus and the lowest in the control treatment. The b* and H* were the highest in 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens, and the lowest in control. Cooking loss, a*, and b* showed linear and quadratic responses, while quadratic responses were found in L* and H* in the H. illucens groups. Likewise, A. domesticus meals exhibited a quadratic effect on cooking loss, and a linear effect on L*, a*, b*, and H* of the broilers.
Impact of H. illucens and A. domesticus meals on the meat quality of broilers.
Trait
Control
Hermetia illucens
Acheta domesticus
PSEM
p-value
HI4
HI8
HI12
AD4
AD8
AD12
ANOVA
HI lin.
HI Quad.
AD Lin.
AD Quad.
Meat pH
6.08
6.11
6.10
6.10
6.10
6.12
6.08
0.57
0.490
0.539
0.753
0.837
0.528
Cooking loss
33.32a
29.32b
26.12c
22.79d
33.16a
30.08b
18.70e
1.13
<0.001
<0.001
0.002
0.278
<0.001
Drip loss
2.35
2.39
2.32
2.29
2.27
2.34
2.39
0.24
0.967
0.482
0.693
0.537
0.472
Share-force
61.02
61.02
60.84
61.06
61.04
61.07
60.70
1.48
0.359
0.643
0.233
0.983
0.467
Lightness L*
58.69a
54.70ab
49.62b
48.94b
57.18a
55.82ab
50.84bc
1.25
0.026
0.447
<0.001
0.002
0.337
Redness a*
12.36c
16.29ab
16.02ab
14.49b
15.95ab
16.13ab
16.99a
0.89
0.015
0.042
<0.001
0.009
0.385
Yellowness b*
12.96c
15.32bc
14.73cd
23.40a
17.43bc
16.03ab
18.45a
0.76
0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.517
Chroma C*
24.93a
24.62a
24.70a
24.75a
24.70a
24.96a
24.93a
1.04
0.195
0.362
0.104
0.346
0.992
Hue H*
23.29b
47.50ab
43.72ab
56.17a
40.89ab
44.77ab
58.21a
1.44
0.134
0.633
<0.001
<0.001
0.990
HI4, 4% H. illucens; HI8, 8% H. illucens; HI12, 12% H. illucens; AD4, 4% A. domesticus; AD8, 8% A. domesticus; AD12, 12% A. domesticus. Values marked with different superscript within a row were significantly different (p < 0.05). PSEM, pooled standard error of the mean; ANOVA, analysis of variance; orthogonal polynomial contrast; HI lin., H. illucens linear; HI quad., H. illucens quadratic; AD lin., A. domesticus linear; SF quad., A. domesticus quadratic.
Discussion
The findings showed that live weight and average daily weight gain were highest in the birds fed with diets containing 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens. Constituents of the diets significantly impact the efficiency of the birds in poultry farming, particularly the protein content and amino acid profiles, which are crucial for growth performances. SBM and FM have lower protein contents and lower-quality amino acids compared to insects (Fisher et al., 2020; Hasnan et al., 2023). Insects such as H. illucens have well-balanced essential amino acids, with methionine 2.2% and lysine 6.1% (García-Vaquero and García, 2024; Hobbi et al., 2022), along with vitamins, while the SBM contains methionine 0.65% and lysine 2.95% (Akhtar and Isman, 2018). Moreover, insects offer superior fatty acids than SBM (Islam et al., 2022; Lu et al., 2022). Insects possess a well-balanced nutritional profile, including essential vitamins and minerals that promote robust and fast growth (Adli, 2021; Choi et al., 2023; da-Silva et al., 2024; Rehman et al., 2019). This study is aligned with those of Loponte et al. (2017), Pieterse et al. (2019), and Dabbou et al. (2018), indicating that substituting SBM at the levels of 10%, 15%, and 50% with BSF resulted in enhanced LW and ADG in Ross 308, Cobb 500, and barbary partridges. Many other previous studies by Biasato et al. (2018) and Vasilopoulos et al. (2023) have presented a substantial increase in live weight and daily weight gain in fast-growing Ross 708 and Ross 308 as well as intermediate-growing Hubbard hybrid when fed 10% to 15% T. molitor meals. Conversely, Ramos-Elorduy et al. (2002) and Biasato et al. (2016) did not report any impact on performances on fast-growing Arbor acres and Hubbard hybrid when fed T. molitor meals.
In the present work, daily feed intake did not change significantly among diets. However, feed intake typically increases when the protein and lipid contents decrease in the feed (Van Harn et al., 2019). The feed color might also affect the feed conversion ratio (Hartinger et al., 2021). Chu et al. (2020), Dabbou et al. (2021), and Sajjad et al. (2024c) registered comparable results in broiler Ross 308.
In this study, the feed conversion ratio was improved when broilers were fed 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens. The feed conversion ratio is the most imperative indicator of meal efficiency in livestock production (Davison et al., 2023; Prakash et al., 2020). It can decrease feed conversion ratio by replacing SBM with insect meal owing to the highest nutrients, balanced AAs, palatability, digestibility, and lower anti-nutritional aspects (Parrini et al., 2023; Siddiqui et al., 2024). This study’s results are analogous to the findings of Schiavone et al. (2017), who indicated that replacing soybean oil with H. illucens, either partially or completely, enhanced the feed conversion ratio in Ross 308. The study by Kim et al. (2020) and Lalev et al. (2022) revealed that the inclusion of 5% and 10% H. illucens and B. mori in broiler meals led to significant improvement in feed conversion ratio in broilers. Bovera et al. (2015) and Kierończyk et al. (2018) found an improvement in the feed conversion ratio in Ross 308 feeding 10% to 30% T. molitor. Ognik et al. (2020) reported that 15% H. illucens improved FCR in young turkeys, while Murawska et al. (2021) found no improvement in feed conversion ratio in Ross 308, even at 75% H. illucens.
In this investigation, 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens resulted in the highest Hb, RBCs, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, platelets, total leucocytes, and lymphocytes. Insects have a superior nutritional profile compared to traditional protein sources, which may impact the hematology of the broilers (Marono et al., 2017; Zulkifli et al., 2022). They contain higher concentrations of essential amino acids, absorbable minerals (iron and zinc), and functional lipids, which can boost blood traits by promoting RBC production, hemoglobin levels, and the overall health of the birds (Slimen et al., 2023; Zhou et al., 2022). The higher iron content in insect meal is vital for the synthesis of hemoglobin and erythropoiesis in the broiler (Elliott, 2008; Sajjad et al., 2024a). Zinc is another mineral abundant in insects that plays an essential role in enzymatic functions and the development of immune cells, potentially enhancing leukocyte production and strengthening the immune system (Vasilopoulos et al., 2024a). This study’s results are consonant with Biasato et al. (2017), who noticed that hematological traits improved in broilers Ross 708 when fed insect-based meals. Gariglio et al. (2019), Kim et al. (2020), Schiavone et al. (2017), and Ognik et al. (2020) depicted that supplanting 4% to 100% soybean oil or SBM with insects did not affect the hematological attributes. Lymphocytes were increased when the broiler was fed 20% H. illucens (De Souza Vilela et al., 2021).
In this inquiry, the diets containing 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens exhibited the lowest concentrations of creatinine, uric acid, glucose, and cholesterol, while showing the highest levels of total protein, albumin, and globulin. The chitin and chitosan of insect exoskeletons could potentially have chelating effects that lower the concentrations of uric acid, glucose, and cholesterol in the blood (Hossain and Blair, 2007; Khambualai et al., 2008). This, in turn, may enhance the metabolic functioning of the bird (Alagawany et al., 2022; Sypniewski et al., 2020). The nutritional value of the feed may strengthen the immunity system of birds and increase their resistance against several infectious diseases (Schiavone et al., 2017). Total protein and globulin levels are usually influenced by isoenergetic and isoprotenic diets (Bovera et al., 2016). This study’s results are consistent with previous findings by Sedgh-Gooya et al. (2021) and Bovera et al. (2018), who revealed that 5% to 100% inclusion of T. molitor meals increased the concentrations of total protein and globulin and diminished the level of uric acid in Shaver brown broilers and Bovans white laying hens.
In the current study, the interactions between the dietary treatment and the sites of the small intestine showed significant differences. The villus height, villus width, and villus height/crypt depth ratio were the largest at the jejunum and ileum sites of the intestine using 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens with the smallest crypt depth. The morphology of the intestine is affected by the consumption of insects, which have a unique composition of bio-active compounds, including chitin, antimicrobial peptides, and short-chain fatty acids (Vasilopoulos et al., 2024b). Moreover, chitin may act as a prebiotic that stimulates beneficial gut microbiota such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, enhancing the gastrointestinal tract’s health and villus growth (Mohan et al., 2023). Furthermore, antimicrobial peptides might contribute to maintaining intestinal integrity by decreasing the load of pathogenic bacteria, which decreases inflammation and promotes healthy villus development (Patyra and Kwiatek, 2023). Nutrient absorption is primarily related to histological indices of the intestine, particularly the villi and crypts (Amer et al., 2021). The longest villi and the shortest crypts play a fundamental role in the efficient digestion and absorption of nutrients (Ravindran and Abdollahi, 2021). This study’s results are aligned with Sajjad et al. (2024a) and Sajjad et al. (2024c), who found comparable effects in Ross 308 when fed 12% Spodoptera frugiperda and 12% A. diaperinus. Another study by Dabbou et al. (2018) and Dabbou et al. (2021) reported that the gut histological indices improved in broilers feeding on defatted and modified H. illucens meals.
The findings of this study presented that 12% A. domesticus and 12% H. illucens diets had the maximum a*, b*, and H* values, along with the minimum cooking loss and L* values. The physical meat and skin properties, such as color and tenderness, do not differ, as color can affect consumer acceptance (Bovera et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2011). High concentrations of lauric acid, myristic acid, and eicosapentaenoic acid, as well as the pigments of the feed ingredients, can influence the color and texture of meat (Cullere et al., 2019; Vilela et al., 2021). Replacing SBM (7.8%) with H. illucens reduced cooking loss in broiler Ross 308 (Leiber et al., 2017). Murawska et al. (2021), Kim et al. (2019), and Sajjad et al. (2024a) found that increasing the levels of H. illucens and lesser mealworm A. diaperinus in the feeds dwindled cooking loss while increasing the b* (Ross 308). However, several factors, including feed, stage, breed, and slaughtering techniques, can significantly affect the meat (Mir et al., 2017).
Incorporating local insect species as feed ingredients in the poultry sector offers several advantages. Utilizing locally sourced insects can reduce dependency on imported feed ingredients, lower feed costs, and contribute to a more sustainable and environmentally friendly poultry industry. Additionally, insect farming has a smaller carbon footprint, minimizes waste, and promotes circular economies (Madau et al., 2020).
Conclusions
Utilizing H. illucens and A. domesticus as a protein source significantly impacted live weight, average body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, hematological traits, gut histology, and meat quality in Ross 308. Overall, the birds fed with 12% H. illucens and 12% A. domesticus for 35 days performed better than those fed other diets. Therefore, it can be concluded that H. illucens and A. domesticus are viable alternative ingredients that can substitute SBM to develop a local-based feed ingredient for broiler chickens at the optimal inclusion rate of 12% without compromising performance and health as evidenced by blood parameters, gut histology, and meat quality of the birds. Future research should investigate how H. illucens and A. domesticus meals affect the gut microbiota of broilers when utilized as a principal protein source in poultry feed.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The animal study was approved by University of Animal and Veterinary Sciences (UVAS), Ravi Campus, Pattoki, Lahore, Pakistan. The Ethical Review Committee (No. DR/495) at UVAS approved all the procedures. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
FM: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. AS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MS: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. MA: Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft. HB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. MGA: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. MB: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing. RM: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The authors declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the National Research Program for Universities, Higher Education Commission of Pakistan under project no. 13049 titled “Substituting traditional protein source in poultry diet with low cost and more sustainable insect protein” and by a Lithuanian state grant through the Nature Research Centre, program 2 Climate and Eco-systems, Vilnius, Lithuania, available to RM.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Department of Animal Nutrition and Poultry Production and Avian Research and Training Centre UVAS for assisting in this study.
Conflict of interest
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
ReferencesAdenijiA. (2007). Effect of replacing groundnut cake with maggot meal in the diet of broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci.6, 822–825. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2007.822.825AdetunmbiT. (2023). The potential of insects as alternative animal protein source for livestock feeding. Glob. J. Agric. Sci.22, 47–61. doi: 10.4314/gjass.v22i1.6AdliD. N. (2021). Use of insects in poultry feed as replacement soya bean meal and fish meal in development countries: a systematic review. Livest. Res. Rur. Dev.33, 128–131. Available at: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd33/10/33128danun.html (Accessed January 24, 2025).AkhtarY.IsmanM. B. (2018). “Insects as an alternative protein source,” in Proteins in food processing (Sawston, United Kingdom: Elsevier), 263–288. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-100722-8.00011-5AlagawanyM.AshourE. A.El-KholyM. S.Abou-KassemD. E.RoshdyT.Abd El-HackM. E. (2022). Consequences of varying dietary crude protein and metabolizable energy levels on growth performance, carcass characteristics and biochemical parameters of growing geese. Anim. Biotechnol.33, 638–646. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2020.1814791AmerS. A.BeheiryR. R.Abdel FattahD. M.RoushdyE. M.HassanF. A.IsmailT. A.. (2021). Effects of different feeding regimens with protease supplementation on growth, amino acid digestibility, economic efficiency, blood biochemical parameters, and intestinal histology in broiler chickens. BMC Vet. Res.17, 1–16. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02946-2BallitocD. A.SunS. (2013). Ground yellow mealworms (Tenebrio molitor L.) feed supplementation improves growth performance and carcass yield characteristics in broilers. Open Sci. Repository Agric.18, e23050425. doi: 10.7392/OPENACCESS.23050425BenzertihaA.KierończykB.KołodziejskiP.Pruszyńska–OszmałekE.RawskiM.JózefiakD.. (2020). Tenebrio molitor and Zophobas morio full-fat meals as functional feed additives affect broiler chickens’ growth performance and immune system traits. Poult. Sci.99, 196–206. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez450BenzertihaA.KierończykB.RawskiM.JózefiakA.KozłowskiK.JankowskiJ.. (2019). Tenebrio molitor and Zophobas morio full-fat meals in broiler chicken diets: Effects on nutrients digestibility, digestive enzyme activities, and cecal microbiome. Animals9, 1128–1150. doi: 10.3390/ani9121128BiasatoI.De MarcoM.RotoloL.RennaM.LussianaC.DabbouS.. (2016). Effects of dietary Tenebrio molitor meal inclusion in free-range chickens. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.100, 1104–1112. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12487BiasatoI.GascoL.De MarcoM.RennaM.RotoloL.DabbouS.. (2017). Effects of yellow mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor) inclusion in diets for female broiler chickens: implications for animal health and gut histology. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.234, 253–263. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.09.014BiasatoI.GascoL.De MarcoM.RennaM.RotoloL.DabbouS.. (2018). Yellow mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor) inclusion in diets for male broiler chickens: effects on growth performance, gut morphology, and histological findings. Poult. Sci.97, 540–548. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex308BoveraF.LoponteR.MaronoS.PiccoloG.ParisiG.IaconisiV.. (2016). Use of Tenebrio molitor larvae meal as protein source in broiler diet: Effect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass and meat traits. J. Anim. Sci.94, 639–647. doi: 10.2527/jas2015-9201BoveraF.LoponteR.PeroM. E.CutrignelliM. I.CalabròS.MuscoN.. (2018). Laying performance, blood profiles, nutrient digestibility and inner organs traits of hens fed an insect meal from Hermetia illucens larvae. Res. Vet. Sci.120, 86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.09.006BoveraF.PiccoloG.GascoL.MaronoS.LoponteR.VassalottiG.. (2015). Yellow mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor, L.) as a possible alternative to soybean meal in broiler diets. Br. Poult. Sci.56, 569–575. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2015.1080815CampbellT. W. (1995). Avian hematology and cytology (Ames, Iowa, United States: Iowa State University Press).ChoiJ.KongB.BowkerB. C.ZhuangH.KimW. K. (2023). Nutritional strategies to improve meat quality and composition in the challenging conditions of broiler production: a review. Animals13, 1386. doi: 10.3390/ani13081386ChuX.LiM.WangG.WangK.ShangR.WangZ.. (2020). Evaluation of the low inclusion of full-fatted Hermetia illucens larvae meal for layer chickens: Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gut health. Front. Vet. Sci.7. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.585843CullereM.WoodsM. J.Van EmmenesL.PieterseE.HoffmanL. C.Dalle ZotteA. (2019). Hermetia illucens larvae reared on different substrates in broiler quail diets: effect on physicochemical and sensory quality of the quail meat. Animals9, 525–543. doi: 10.3390/ani9080525DabbouS.GaiF.BiasatoI.CapucchioM. T.BiasibettiE.DezzuttoD.. (2018). Black soldier fly defatted meal as a dietary protein source for broiler chickens: Effects on growth performance, blood traits, gut morphology and histological features. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol.9, 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s4010401802669DabbouS.LauwaertsA.FerrocinoI.BiasatoI.SirriF.ZampigaM.. (2021). Modified black soldier fly larva fat in broiler diet: Effects on performance, carcass traits, blood parameters, histomorphological features and gut microbiota. Animals11, 1837. doi: 10.3390/ani11061837DahiruS.AzharB.AnjasB.AsmaraB. (2016). Performance of spring chicken fed different inclusion levels of black soldier fly larvae meal. Entomol. Ornithol. Herpetol.5, 185–189. doi: 10.4172/2161-0983.1000185DanieliP. P.LussianaC.GascoL.AmiciA.RonchiB. (2019). The effects of diet formulation on the yield, proximate composition, and fatty acid profile of the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) prepupae intended for animal feed. Animals9, 178. doi: 10.3390/ani9040178da-SilvaW. C.da SilvaÉB.R.da SilvaJ. A. R.MartoranoL. G.BeloT. S.SousaC. E. L.. (2024). Nutritional Value of the Larvae of the Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) and the House Fly (Musca domestica) as a Food Alternative for Farm Animals—A Systematic Review. Insects15, 619. doi: 10.3390/insects15080619DavisonC.MichieC.TachtatzisC.AndonovicI.BowenJ.DuthieC.-A. (2023). Feed conversion ratio (FCR) and performance group estimation based on predicted feed intake for the optimisation of beef production. Sensors23, 4621. doi: 10.3390/s23104621De Souza VilelaJ.AndronicosN. M.KolakshyapatiM.HilliarM.SibandaT. Z.AndrewN. R.. (2021). Black soldier fly larvae in broiler diets improve broiler performance and modulate the immune system. Anim. Nutr.7, 695–706. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.08.014ElliottS. (2008). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and other methods to enhance oxygen transport. Br. J. Pharmacol.154, 529–541. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.89FerreiraT.RasbandW. (2012). ImageJ user guide—IJ 1.46. Available online at: http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/guide (Accessed 26 September 2023). imagej. nih.FisherH.CollinsS.HansonC.MasonB.ColomboS.AndersonD. (2020). Black soldier fly larvae meal as a protein source in low fish meal diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture521, 734978. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.734978FrancoJ. R. G.MurakamiA. E.NataliM. R. M.GarciaE.FurlanA. C. (2006). Influence of delayed placement and dietary lysine levels on small intestine morphometrics and performance of broilers. Braz. J. Poult. Sci.8, 233–241. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2006000400006García-VaqueroM.GarcíaC. Á. (2024). “Nutritional value of insects and derived ingredients,” in Insects as food and food ingredients (Dublin, Ireland: Elsevier), 31–45. doi: 10.1016/B9780323955942000094GariglioM.DabbouS.CrispoM.BiasatoI.GaiF.GascoL.. (2019). Effects of the dietary inclusion of partially defatted black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) meal on the blood chemistry and tissue (Spleen, Liver, Thymus, and Bursa of Fabricius) histology of muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata domestica). Animals9, 307. doi: 10.3390/ani9060307GascoL.BiancarosaI.LilandN. S. (2020). From waste to feed: A review of recent knowledge on insects as producers of protein and fat for animal feeds. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem.23, 67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.03.003HalloranA.HanboonsongY.RoosN.BruunS. (2017). Life cycle assessment of cricket farming in north-eastern Thailand. J. Clean. Prod.156, 83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.017HanX.HeinonenM. (2022). Processing improves physical and oxidative stability of cricket protein emulsions. Food Chem. Adv.1, 100125. doi: 10.1016/j.focha.2022.100125HartingerK.GreinixJ.ThalerN.EbbingM. A.YacoubiN.SchedleK.. (2021). Effect of graded substitution of soybean meal by Hermetia illucens larvae meal on animal performance, apparent ileal digestibility, gut histology and microbial metabolites of broilers. Animals11, 1628–1644. doi: 10.3390/ani11061628HasnanF. F. B.FengY.SunT.ParragaK.SchwarzM.ZareiM. (2023). Insects as valuable sources of protein and peptides: production, functional properties, and challenges. Foods12, 4243. doi: 10.3390/foods12234243HenryM.GascoL.PiccoloG.FountoulakiE. (2015). Review on the use of insects in the diet of farmed fish: past and future. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.203, 1–22. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2015.03.001HobbiP.BekhitA. E.-D. A.DebasteF.LeiN.ShavandiA. (2022). “Insect-derived protein as food and feed,” in Alternative proteins (Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press), 85–132.HossainS.BlairR. (2007). Chitin utilisation by broilers and its effect on body composition and blood metabolites. Br. Poult. Sci.48, 33–38. doi: 10.1080/00071660601156529HwangboJ.HongE.JangA.KangH.OhJ.KimB.. (2009). Utilization of house fly-maggots, a feed supplement in the production of broiler chickens. J. Environ. Biol.30, 609–614.IjaiyaA.EkoE. (2009). Effect of replacing dietary fish meal with silkworm (Anaphe infracta) caterpillar meal on growth, digestibility and economics of production of starter broiler chickens. Pak. J. Nutr.8, 845–849. doi: 10.3923/pjn.2009.845.849IslamM.HosainN.IslamA. T. M. F. (2022) in 22nd international biennial conference and AGM 2021, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Muhsina Yasmin, Bangladesh, 18 March 2022, Vol. 1. 23–33.KaićA.JanječićZ.ŽanetićA.Kelava UgarkovićN.PotočnikK. (2021). EZ-DripLoss assessment in chicken breast meat using different sample areas, fiber orientation, and measurement intervals. Animals11, 1095. doi: 10.3390/ani11041095KhambualaiO.YamauchiK.-e.TangtaweewipatS.Cheva-IsarakulB. (2008). Effects of dietary chitosan diets on growth performance in broiler chickens. J. Poult. Sci.45, 206–209. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.45.206KhanS.KhanR.AlamW.SultanA. (2018). Evaluating the nutritive profile of three insect meals and their effects to replace soya bean in broiler diet. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.102, e662–e668. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12809KhatunR.HowliderM.RahmanM.HasanuzzamanM.RahmanM. (2003). Replacement of fish meal by silkworm pupae in broiler diets. Pak. J. Biol. Sci.6, 955–958. Available at: https://docsdrive.com/pdfs/ansinet/pjbs/2003/955-958.pdf (Accessed January 24, 2025).KierończykB.RawskiM.JózefiakA.MazurkiewiczJ.ŚwiątkiewiczS.SiwekM.. (2018). Effects of replacing soybean oil with selected insect fats on broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.240, 170–183. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.04.002KimS.ChungT.ParkH.ShinM.ParkI.ChoiI. (2019). Effects of diet composition on growth performance and feed conversion efficiency in Alphitobius diaperinus larvae. J. Entomol. Acarol. Res.51, 33–37. doi: 10.4081/jear.2019.7761KimY. B.KimD.-H.JeongS.-B.LeeJ.-W.KimT.-H.LeeH.-G.. (2020). Black soldier fly larvae oil as an alternative fat source in broiler nutrition. Poult. Sci.99, 3133–3143. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.01.018KulmaM.KouřimskáL.HomolkováD.BožikM.PlachýV.VrabecV. (2020). Effect of developmental stage on the nutritional value of edible insects. A case study with Blaberus craniifer and Zophobas morio. J. Food Compos. Anal.92, 103570–103578. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2020.103570KulmaM.KouřimskáL.PlachýV.BožikM.AdámkováA.VrabecV. (2019). Effect of sex on the nutritional value of house cricket, Acheta domestica L. Food Chem.272, 267–272. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.049KuzmukK. N.SwansonK. S.TappendenK. A.SchookL. B.FaheyJ. G.C. (2005). Diet and age affect intestinal morphology and large bowel fermentative end-product concentrations in senior and young adult dogs. J. Nutr.135, 1940–1945. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.8.1940LalevM.HristakievaP.MinchevaN.OblakovaM.IvanovaI. (2022). Insect meal as alternative protein ingredient in broiler feed. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci.28, 743–751. doi: 10.5555/20220391894LaudadioV.PassantinoL.PerilloA.LoprestiG.PassantinoA.KhanR.. (2012). Productive performance and histological features of intestinal mucosa of broiler chickens fed different dietary protein levels. Poult. Sci.91, 265–270. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01675LeiberF.GelencsérT.StamerA.AmslerZ.WohlfahrtJ.FrühB.. (2017). Insect and legume-based protein sources to replace soybean cake in an organic broiler diet: Effects on growth performance and physical meat quality. Renew. Agric. Food Syst.32, 21–27. doi: 10.107/S1742170515000496LoponteR.NizzaS.BoveraF.De RiuN.FliegerovaK.LombardiP.. (2017). Growth performance, blood profiles and carcass traits of Barbary partridge (Alectoris barbara) fed two different insect larvae meals (Tenebrio molitor and Hermetia illucens). Res. Vet. Sci.115, 183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.04.017LuS.TaethaisongN.MeethipW.SurakhunthodJ.SinpruB.SroichakT.. (2022). Nutritional composition of black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) and its potential uses as alternative protein sources in animal diets: A review. Insects13, 831. doi: 10.3390/insects13090831MadauF. A.ArruB.FuresiR.PulinaP. (2020). Insect farming for feed and food production from a circular business model perspective. Sustainability12, 5418. doi: 10.3390/su12135418MakkarH. P.TranG.HeuzéV.AnkersP. (2014). State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.197, 1–33. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008MaronoS.LoponteR.LombardiP.VassalottiG.PeroM.RussoF.. (2017). Productive performance and blood profiles of laying hens fed Hermetia illucens larvae meal as total replacement of soybean meal from 24 to 45 weeks of age. Poult. Sci.96, 1783–1790. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew461McMichaelA. J.BambrickH. J. (2005). Meat consumption trends and health: Casting a wider risk assessment net. Public Health Nutr.8, 341–343. doi: 10.1079/PHN2005742MirN. A.RafiqA.KumarF.SinghV.ShuklaV. (2017). Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review. J. Food Sci. Technol.54, 2997–3009. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2789-zMohanK.RajanD. K.GanesanA. R.DivyaD.JohansenJ.ZhangS. (2023). Chitin, chitosan and chitooligosaccharides as potential growth promoters and immunostimulants in aquaculture: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.86, 126285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126285MurawskaD.DaszkiewiczT.SobotkaW.GesekM.WitkowskaD.MatusevičiusP.. (2021). Partial and total replacement of soybean meal with full-fat black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) larvae meal in broiler chicken diets: impact on growth performance, carcass quality and meat quality. Animals11, 2715. doi: 10.3390/ani11092715NeumannC.VeltenS.LiebertF. (2018). Improving the dietary protein quality by amino acid fortification with a high inclusion level of micro algae (Spirulina platensis) or insect meal (Hermetia illucens) in meat type chicken diets. Open J. Anim. Sci.8, 12–26. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2018.81002OgnikK.KozłowskiK.StępniowskaA.ListosP.JózefiakD.ZduńczykZ.. (2020). Antioxidant status and liver function of young Turkeys receiving a diet with full-fat insect meal from Hermetia illucens. Animals10, 1339. doi: 10.3390/ani10081339OonincxD. G.De BoerI. J. (2012). Environmental impact of the production of mealworms as a protein source for humans–a life cycle assessment. PloS One7, e51145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051145OonincxD.FinkeM. (2021). Nutritional value of insects and ways to manipulate their composition. J. Insects Food Feed7, 639–659. doi: 10.3920/JIFF2020.0050OyegokeO.AkintolaA.FasorantiJ. (2006). Dietary potentials of the edible larvae of Cirina forda (westwood) as a poultry feed. Afr. J. Biotechnol.5, 1799–1802. doi: 10.5897/AJB06.189ParriniS.AquilaniC.PuglieseC.BozziR.SirtoriF. (2023). Soybean replacement by alternative protein sources in pig nutrition and its effect on meat quality. Animals13, 494. doi: 10.3390/ani13030494PatyraE.KwiatekK. (2023). Insect meals and insect antimicrobial peptides as an alternative for antibiotics and growth promoters in livestock production. Pathogens12, 854. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12060854PieterseE.ErasmusS. W.UushonaT.HoffmanL. C. (2019). Black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) pre-pupae meal as a dietary protein source for broiler production ensures a tasty chicken with standard meat quality for every pot. J. Sci. Food Agric.99, 893–903. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9261PrakashA.SaxenaV. K.SinghM. K. (2020). Genetic analysis of residual feed intake, feed conversion ratio and related growth parameters in broiler chicken: A review. World’s Poult. Sci. J.76, 304–317. doi: 10.1080/00439339.2020.1735978PrioloA.MicolD.AgabrielJ.PracheS.DransfieldE. (2002). Effect of grass or concentrate feeding systems on lamb carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci.62, 179–185. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00244-3QaisraniS.MoquetP.Van KrimpenM.KwakkelR.VerstegenM.HendriksW. (2014). Protein source and dietary structure influence growth performance, gut morphology, and hindgut fermentation characteristics in broilers. Poult. Sci.93, 3053–3064. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-04091Ramos-ElorduyJ.GonzálezE. A.HernándezA. R.PinoJ. M. (2002). Use of Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) to recycle organic wastes and as feed for broiler chickens. J. Econ. Entomol.95, 214–220. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-95.1.214RavindranV.AbdollahiM. R. (2021). Nutrition and digestive physiology of the broiler chick: state of the art and outlook. Animals11, 2795. doi: 10.3390/ani11102795RavindranV.AbdollahiM.BootwallaS. (2014). Nutrient analysis, metabolizable energy, and digestible amino acids of soybean meals of different origins for broilers. Poult. Sci.93, 2567–2577. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-04068RehmanA. U.ArifM.HusnainM. M.AlagawanyM.Abd El-HackM. E.TahaA. E.. (2019). Growth performance of broilers as influenced by different levels and sources of methionine plus cysteine. Animals9, 1056. doi: 10.3390/ani9121056Ross (2022). Ross 308 nutrition specifications (Scotland (UK: Aviagen).SajidQ. U. A.AsgharM. U.TariqH.WilkM.PłatekA. (2023). Insect meal as an alternative to protein concentrates in poultry nutrition with future perspectives (An updated review). Agriculture13, 1239–1264. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13061239SajjadM.BinyameenM.SajjadA.SarmadM.AbbasiA.KhanE.. (2024a). Replacing soybean meal with lesser mealworm Alphitobius diaperinus improves broiler productive performances, haematology, intestinal morphology and meat quality. J. Insects Food Feed1, 1–22. doi: 10.1163/23524588-00001190SajjadM.SajjadA.ChishtiG.BinyameenM.AbbasiA.HaqI.. (2024b). Evaluation of blow fly, Chrysomya megacephala (Calliphoridae: Diptera) as an alternate source of protein in broiler feed. J. Insects Food Feed1, 1–19. doi: 10.1163/23524588-00001109SajjadM.SajjadA.ChishtiG.KhanE.MozūraitisR.BinyameenM. (2024c). Insect larvae as an alternate protein source in poultry feed improve the performance and meat quality of broilers. Animals14, 1–18. doi: 10.3390/ani14142053Sánchez-MurosM.-J.BarrosoF. G.Manzano-AgugliaroF. (2014). Insect meal as renewable source of food for animal feeding: a review. J. Clean Prod.65, 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.068SchiavoneA.CastilloA. (2024). Incorporating whole insect larvae into poultry diets: state of the art and future perspectives. Ital. J. Anim. Sci.23, 1–14. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2023.2283083SchiavoneA.CullereM.De MarcoM.MeneguzM.BiasatoI.BergagnaS.. (2017). Partial or total replacement of soybean oil by black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) fat in broiler diets: Effect on growth performances, feed-choice, blood traits, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Ital. J. Anim. Sci.16, 93–100. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2016.1249968SchiavoneA.DabbouS.PetracciM.ZampigaM.SirriF.BiasatoI.. (2019). Black soldier fly defatted meal as a dietary protein source for broiler chickens: Effects on carcass traits, breast meat quality and safety. Animal13, 2397–2405. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000685Sedgh-GooyaS.TorkiM.DarbemamiehM.KhamisabadiH.AbdolmohamadiA. (2021). Effect of dietary inclusion of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) larvae meal on productive performance, egg quality indices and blood parameters of laying hens. Anim. Prod. Sci.61, 1365–1372. doi: 10.1071/AN20102SiddiquiS. A.ElsheikhW.Ucakİ.HasanM.PerlitaZ. C.YudhistiraB. (2024). Replacement of soy by mealworms for livestock feed-A comparative review between soy and mealworms considering environmental aspects. Environ. Dev. Sustainability, 1–44. doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04874-1SlimenI. B.YerouH.LarbiM. B.M’HamdiN.NajarT. (2023). Insects as an alternative protein source for poultry nutrition: a review. Front. Vet. Sci.10, 1–15. doi: 10.1071/AN20102SypniewskiJ.KierończykB.BenzertihaA.MikołajczakZ.Pruszyńska-OszmałekE.KołodziejskiP.. (2020). Replacement of soybean oil by Hermetia illucens fat in Turkey nutrition: effect on performance, digestibility, microbial community, immune and physiological status and final product quality. Br. Poult. Sci.61, 294–302. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2020.1716302TanS. W.LaiK. S.LohJ. Y. (2018). Effects of food wastes on yellow mealworm Tenebrio molitor larval nutritional profiles and growth performances. Examines Mar. Biol. Oceanogr2, 173–178. doi: 10.31031/EIMBO.2018.02.000530UdomsilN.ImsoonthornruksaS.GosalawitC.Ketudat-CairnsM. (2019). Nutritional values and functional properties of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) and field cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus). Food Sci. Technol. Res.25, 597–605. doi: 10.3136/fstr.25.597Van HarnJ.DijkslagM.Van KrimpenM. (2019). Effect of low protein diets supplemented with free amino acids on growth performance, slaughter yield, litter quality, and footpad lesions of male broilers. Poult. Sci.98, 4868–4877. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez229Van HuisA. (2013). Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annu. Rev. Entomol.58, 563–583. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704Van HuisA.Van ItterbeeckJ.KlunderH.MertensE.HalloranA.MuirG.. (2013). Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security (Italy: Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations).Van PeerM.FrooninckxL.CoudronC.BerrensS.ÁlvarezC.DeruytterD.. (2021). Valorisation potential of using organic side streams as feed for Tenebrio molitor, Acheta domesticus and Locusta migratoria. Insects12, 796. doi: 10.3390/insects12090796VasilopoulosS.GiannenasI.AthanassiouG. ,. C.RumbosC.PapadopoulosE.FortomarisP. (2024a). Black soldier fly, mealworm and superworm: chemical composition and comparative effect on broiler growth. World’s Poult. Sci. J.80, 681–710. doi: 10.1080/00439339.2024.2365919VasilopoulosS.GiannenasI.MellidouI.StylianakiI.AntonopoulouE.TzoraA.. (2024b). Diet replacement with whole insect larvae affects intestinal morphology and microbiota of broiler chickens. Sci. Rep.14, 6836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54184-9VasilopoulosS.GiannenasI.SavvidouS.BonosE.RumbosC. I.PapadopoulosE.. (2023). Growth performance, welfare traits and meat characteristics of broilers fed diets partly replaced with whole Tenebrio molitor larvae. Anim. Nutr.13, 90–100. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2022.12.002VeldkampT.BoschG. (2015). Insects: a protein-rich feed ingredient in pig and poultry diets. Anim. Front.5, 45–50. doi: 10.2527/af.2015-0019VeldkampT.DongL.PaulA.GoversC. (2022). Bioactive properties of insect products for monogastric animals–a review. J. Insects Food Feed8, 1027–1040. doi: 10.3920/JIFF2021.0031VilelaJ. S.AlvarengaT. I.AndrewN. R.McPheeM.KolakshyapatiM.HopkinsD. L.. (2021). Technological quality, amino acid and fatty acid profile of broiler meat enhanced by dietary inclusion of black soldier fly larvae. Foods10, 1–20. doi: 10.3390/foods10020297WangD.ZhaiS. W.ZhangC. X.BaiY. Y.AnS. H.XuY. N. (2005). Evaluation on nutritional value of field crickets as a poultry feedstuff. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci.18, 667–670. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2005.667YangC.LiX.LiQ.ZhangZ.LiW.JiangX. (2011). Evaluation for meat quality performance of broiler chicken. J. Anim. Vet. Adv.10, 949–954. doi: 10.3923/javaa.2011.949.954ZadehZ. S.KheiriF.FaghaniM. (2019). Use of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) as a protein source on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality and intestinal morphology of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica). Vet. Anim. Sci.8, 100066. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2019.100066ZaidM.HussainJ.MahmudA.JavedK.ShaheenM. S.UsmanM.. (2020). Carcass traits, meat quality, and sensory attributes of fast-growing broilers givenoutdoor access at different ages. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci.44, 1039–1046. doi: 10.3906/vet-2003-92ZhouY.WangD.ZhouS.DuanH.GuoJ.YanW. (2022). Nutritional composition, health benefits, and application value of edible insects: a review. Foods11, 3961. doi: 10.3390/foods11243961ZulkifliN. F. N. M.Seok-KianA. Y.SengL. L.MustafaS.KimY.-S.ShapawiR. (2022). Nutritional value of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae processed by different methods. PloS One17, e0263924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263924