<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Anim. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Animal Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Anim. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-6225</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fanim.2021.745848</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Animal Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Characterizing Effects of Ingredients Differing in Ruminally Degradable Protein and Fiber Supplies on the Ovine Rumen Microbiome Using Next-Generation Sequencing</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gleason</surname> <given-names>Claire B.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1416676/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Settlage</surname> <given-names>Robert E.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1452456/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Beckett</surname> <given-names>Linda M.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1485820/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>Robin R.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1007885/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech</institution>, <addr-line>Blacksburg, VA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Virginia Bioinformatics Institute, Virginia Tech</institution>, <addr-line>Blacksburg, VA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University</institution>, <addr-line>West Lafayette, IN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: James Levi Klotz, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Suban Foiklang, Maejo University, Thailand; Ahmed Elolimy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Robin R. White <email>rrwhite&#x00040;vt.edu</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Animal Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Animal Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>2</volume>
<elocation-id>745848</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>03</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2021 Gleason, Settlage, Beckett and White.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Gleason, Settlage, Beckett and White</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license> </permissions>
<abstract><p>The ratio of concentrate to forage within diets is known to alter rumen microbial profiles, but comparatively less information is available on the effect of differing sources of individual nutrients on the microbiome. The objective of this study was to investigate rumen microbial responses to diets composed of protein and fiber sources expected to vary in nutrient degradability. The responses of interest included relative abundances of bacterial taxa as well as estimations of community richness and diversity. Ten ruminally cannulated wethers (Suffolk, Dorset, or Suffolk &#x000D7; Dorset) received four diet treatments consisting of either beet pulp or timothy hay and soybean meal (SBM) or heat-treated soybean meal (HSBM) in a partially replicated 4 &#x000D7; 4 Latin square experiment for 21 days. Timothy hay and beet pulp were expected to provide differing rumen degradabilities of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) while the soybean meals were expected to provide differing rumen degradabilities of crude protein (CP). Solid and liquid samples of rumen contents were collected for microbial DNA isolation and Next-Generation sequencing. Numerous rumen bacterial population shifts were observed due to change in fiber source, with increased abundances (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05) of fibrolytic populations associated with timothy hay diets compared with beet pulp diets. Conversely, populations of the pectin-degrading genera, <italic>Treponema</italic> and <italic>Lachnospira</italic>, increased on the beet pulp treatment (<italic>P</italic> = 0.015 and <italic>P</italic> = 0.0049, respectively). Limited impact on bacterial taxa was observed between diets differing in protein source. The <italic>Paraprevotellaceae</italic> genus YRC22 was observed to increase in abundance on HSBM diets (<italic>P</italic> = 0.023) and the phylum Spirochaetes tended to be more abundant on SBM than HSBM diets (<italic>P</italic> = 0.071). Beet pulp decreased rumen bacterial diversity (<italic>P</italic> = 0.0027) and tended to decrease bacterial species richness (<italic>P</italic> = 0.051) compared to timothy hay. Our results serve to further underscore the sensitivity of rumen microbes to changes in their preferred substrates, particularly of those associated with fiber degradation.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>microbiome</kwd>
<kwd>next-generation sequencing</kwd>
<kwd>nutrients</kwd>
<kwd>rumen</kwd>
<kwd>sheep</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">U.S. Department of Agriculture<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100000199</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="75"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="9709"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The rumen ecosystem is composed of diverse and dynamic populations of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and protozoa, that are responsible for the vast majority of feed digestion by the host animal (Hungate et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">1964</xref>; Krause et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2013</xref>; Jewell et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2015</xref>). The energy harvested from volatile fatty acids (<bold>VFA</bold>) produced through microbial fermentation of plant material is estimated at 70% of the total metabolic energy used by the ruminant (Bergman, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">1990</xref>). In addition, 60&#x02013;85% of amino acids reaching the small intestine are supplied by rumen microbial protein synthesis (Storm et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">1983</xref>). The rumen microbiome therefore serves as an important intermediate between diet and animal performance (Mullins et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2013</xref>; Gleason and White, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2018</xref>).</p>
<p>High-throughput or Next-Generation sequencing technologies, such as Illumina, have propelled investigations of the rumen microbiome forward with their ability to rapidly and economically sequence the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. Along with bioinformatics techniques and pipelines, Next-Generation sequencing has allowed for detailed characterization of the microbiome, which has greatly enhanced our understanding of this complex ecosystem (Lima et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2015</xref>). Common targets of investigation include relative abundances of the major bacterial taxa, in addition to estimates of species richness and diversity. Variations in these measurements have been linked to variations in livestock production traits, including milk yield and components (Indugu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2017</xref>; Wu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">2021</xref>), average daily gain (Min et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2019</xref>), and feed efficiency (McLoughlin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Previous research has demonstrated that the microbial community can be influenced by diet forage-to-concentrate ratio (de Menezes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2011</xref>; Carberry et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2012</xref>; Petri et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2013</xref>) and by alterations in amounts of specific concentrate ingredients (Callaway et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2010</xref>; Petri et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">2014</xref>). However, little information on the effects of differing nutrient degradabilities is currently available. Therefore, our objective was to examine how the rumen microbiome responds to supplies of protein and fiber sources possessing differing degradability profiles of crude protein (<bold>CP</bold>) and neutral detergent fiber (<bold>NDF</bold>), respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>Animals, Experimental Design, and Treatments</title>
<p>All animal use and procedures were approved by the Virginia Tech Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Protocol &#x00023;18-096). Ten ruminally cannulated commercial wethers (Suffolk, Dorset, or Suffolk &#x000D7; Dorset) were housed in individual stalls at the Smithfield Farm, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. All wethers were consuming a basic forage diet prior to study enrollment. Wethers were &#x0007E;1.5 years of age and weighed an average of 62.1 &#x000B1; 6.6 kg at trial commencement. Wethers were assigned to treatments in a partially replicated 4 &#x000D7; 4 Latin square so that treatment groups were balanced for initial body weight. Treatments were assigned using a 2 &#x000D7; 2 factorial approach and included feedstuffs intended to supply varying rumen degradabilities of CP and NDF. Soybean meal (<bold>SBM</bold>) and heat-treated soybean meal (<bold>HSBM</bold>) were utilized as the CP sources with high and low rumen degradabilities, respectively (NRC, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2016</xref>). These meals were pelleted with alfalfa, corn, barley, wheat middlings, trace mineral salt, and a sheep vitamin premix (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). Pelleted beet pulp (<bold>BP</bold>) and long timothy hay (<bold>TH</bold>) represented the NDF sources, with BP expected to undergo a faster rate of fiber degradation compared to TH (Van Soest et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">1991</xref>; DePeters et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">1997</xref>). Diets were prepared by combining the appropriate protein pellet with the appropriate fiber source to create the 4 treatments: highly degradable CP plus lowly degradable NDF (<bold>SBM-TH</bold>), highly degradable CP plus highly degradable NDF (<bold>SBM-BP</bold>), lowly degradable CP plus lowly degradable NDF (<bold>HSBM-TH</bold>), and lowly degradable CP plus highly degradable NDF (<bold>HSBM-BP</bold>). Each animal consumed each of the 4 diets for 21 days. Gradual diet adaptation occurred during the first 3 days (with animals receiving 25, 50, and 75% of their ration as the new diet on each day, respectively) and 100% of the diet treatment was offered for the remaining 18 days. Upon the completion of a period, diet adaptation for the next period began on the following day. Animals were fed once daily at 0800 h. Clean, fresh water was available at all times.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Ingredients and nutrient inclusion for each treatment diet<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN1">a</xref>,<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN2">b</xref></sup>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Ingredient, % of DM</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SBM-TH</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>HSBM-TH</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SBM-BP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>HSBM-BP</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Alfalfa hay</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Barley</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Soybean meal</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Soyplus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Timothy hay</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Beet pulp</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wheat middlings</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Trace mineral salt</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vitamin premix</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" colspan="5"><bold>Nutrient, %</bold><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN3"><sup><bold><italic>c</italic></bold></sup></xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DM</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">96.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NDF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">29.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ADF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lignin</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Starch</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ash</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.96</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN1">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>HSBM-TH, heat treated soybean meal and timothy hay; SBM-TH, soybean meal and timothy hay; HSBM-BP, heat treated soybean meal and beet pulp; SBM-BP, heat treated soybean meal and beet pulp</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN2">
<label>b</label>
<p><italic>Alfalfa hay, corn, barley, wheat middlings, trace mineral salt, and vitamin premix were incorporated into pellets along with either soybean meal or Soyplus to create the SBM and HSBM treatments, respectively</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN3">
<label>c</label>
<p><italic>Nutrient percentages are expressed on a DM basis except for DM, which is expressed on an AF basis</italic>.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Sample Collection and DNA Isolation</title>
<p>Fluid and solid samples of rumen contents from all animals were collected at 0730 h on day 16 of each period. The remaining days of the period through d 21 were devoted to investigations into rumen fermentation responses (Gleason et al., <italic>unpublished</italic>). The early timing of rumen sampling in relation to feeding was chosen so as to not interfere with other experimental activities that were occurring around the same time (ruminal infusions and bolusing, etc., intended for the separate publication mentioned). Contents were collected <italic>via</italic> the cannula from the dorsal sac after slight hand mixing and strained through 1 layer of gauze to separate the fluid and solid fractions. Samples were stored in cryovials at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C until total DNA extraction. Extraction was performed on 0.5 g of a liquid or solid sample using a QIAamp DNA stool minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer&#x00027;s protocol. Sample DNA concentrations and 260/280 ratios were obtained using a spectrophotometer (Epoch2 Microplate Reader, Biotek, Winooski, VT). Extracted DNA was stored at &#x02212;80&#x000B0;C until further processing.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>PCR Amplification, Next-Generation Sequencing, and Bioinformatic Analysis</title>
<p>The universal primers 515F and 926R were chosen to amplify the V4&#x02013;V5 region of the 16S rRNA gene following the Earth Microbiome Project protocol (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.earthmicrobiome.org/">https://www.earthmicrobiome.org/</ext-link>). The PCR reaction mixture included 13.0 &#x003BC;L of PCR-grade water, 1.0 &#x003BC;L of template DNA, 10 &#x003BC;M of each primer, and 10.0 &#x003BC;L of 5PRIME HotMasterMix (2 &#x000D7; ) (Quantabio, Beverly, MA). Samples were amplified in duplicate under the following thermocycler conditions: 94&#x000B0;C for 3 min for initial denaturing, then 35 cycles of 94&#x000B0;C for 45 s, 50&#x000B0;C for 60 s, and 72&#x000B0;C for 90 s. A final elongation step occurred at 72&#x000B0;C for 10 min followed by a hold at 4&#x000B0;C. After pooling duplicates, all amplicons were visualized on a 2% agarose gel and quantitated on a Qubit fluorometer (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH). Normalization was performed based on Qubit results, and amplicons were purified on a Pippin Prep (Sage Science, Beverly, MA) targeting a 520 bp range. Quantitative PCR was then run on the pool. Amplicons were loaded at 9.5 pM and sequenced using the MiSeq v3 600-cycle kit on the Miseq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). All sequences were submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (accession&#x00023; <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA753122">PRJNA753122</ext-link>). Sequence analyses were conducted using the QIIME 2 bioinformatics platform version 2019.10 (Bolyen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2019</xref>) following the protocol of Estaki et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2020</xref>). Sequence quality filtering and denoising was performed using Deblur (Amir et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2017</xref>). Sequences were then clustered into OTUs and taxonomic identities assigned at a 97% identity cut-off using a naive Bayes classifier with the Greengenes database as a reference (DeSantis et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2006</xref>). Relative abundances of taxa were obtained by dividing the reads assigned to a given taxon by the total number of reads present. Richness and diversity estimates were obtained using the Core Diversity command.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>Results were analyzed using the nlme package (Pinheiro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">2020</xref>) in R version 3.6.1 (R Core Team, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2019</xref>). Response variables included percent relative abundances of bacterial taxa at the phylum, family, and genus levels, number of observed OTUs, and Shannon diversity index value. Response variables were analyzed using the linear model:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mtable columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x003BC;</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003B1;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003B2;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003B1;</mml:mi><mml:mi>&#x003B2;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where &#x003BC; represents the overall mean, &#x003B1;<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> is the effect of the <italic>i</italic>th CP source, &#x003B2;<sub><italic>j</italic></sub> is the effect of the <italic>jt</italic>h NDF source, &#x003B1;&#x003B2;<sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> is the interaction of CP source <italic>i</italic> and NDF source <italic>j, c</italic><sub><italic>k</italic></sub> represents the random effect of animal <italic>k, d</italic><sub><italic>l</italic></sub> represents the random effect of period <italic>l</italic>, and <italic>e</italic><sub><italic>ijkl</italic></sub> is the residual error associated with CP source <italic>i</italic>, NDF source <italic>j</italic>, animal <italic>k</italic>, and period <italic>l</italic>. Compound Symmetry, Unstructured, and 1st Order Autoregressive residual error variance structures were compared for each response variable and the Akaike information criterion (<bold>AIC</bold>) was used to assess model quality (Hurvich and Tsai, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">1989</xref>). The model with the lowest AIC value was subjected to ANOVA and least square means were determined. Statistical significance was considered when <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05 and a tendency considered when 0.05 &#x02264; <italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.10.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<p>Demultiplexed sequence counts totaled 14,851,796 reads with a median length of 300 nucleotides and an average of 198,024 sequences per sample. The predominant bacterial phylum identified was Bacteroidetes, ranging between 73.1 and 78.5% relative abundance across treatment means in rumen fluid (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) and between 52.4 and 74.5% in rumen solids (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Other phyla representing at least 1% mean relative abundance included Firmicutes, Fibrobacteres, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Tenericutes, and Cyanobacteria in both fractions. Populations of Fibrobacteres and Spirochaetes were considerably more pronounced in the solid fraction than in fluid (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1A,B</xref>), which is consistent with previous observations (de Menezes et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2011</xref>). Their representatives at the family level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2A,B</xref>) and genus level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3A,B</xref>) also reflected these differences. A number of taxonomic lines were found to display variation in response to the different diet treatments. These belonged largely to the predominant phyla identified, including Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Spirochaetes, Tenericutes, and Verrucomicrobia. Increases in relative abundance were mainly associated with the TH treatment and decreases with the BP treatment, with few exceptions.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>LS means &#x000B1; SE for percent relative abundances of bacterial taxa identified in the rumen fluid fraction as differentiated by diet along with <italic>P</italic> values for the effects of protein source, fiber source, and the interaction of protein and fiber source<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN4">a</xref>,<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN5">b</xref></sup>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Taxonomic classification</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Diet</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><italic><bold>P</bold></italic> <bold>value</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Phylum</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Family</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Genus</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SBM-TH</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>HSBM-TH</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SBM-BP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>HSBM-BP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Protein</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fiber</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Protein &#x000D7; Fiber</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Euryarchaeota (domain Archaea)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0113, 0.061</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.232, 0.061</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.157, 0.064</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.129, 0.064</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Euryarchaeota (domain Archaea)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Methanomassiliicoccaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0950, 0.058</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.230, 0.058</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.121, 0.062</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.118, 0.061</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.5, 4.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.1, 4.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">77.6, 4.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78.6, 4.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS11</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.20, 0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0354, 0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.391, 0.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.790, 0.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">p-2534-18B5</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.76, 3.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.57, 3.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.15, 3.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.47, 3.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Paraprevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.55, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.20, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.78, 1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.60, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Paraprevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CF231</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.93, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.27, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.17, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.268, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Paraprevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">YRC22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.416, 0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.424, 0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.112, 0.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04, 0.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0072</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.052</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0056</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Porphyromonadaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.155, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.202, 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0291, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00406, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Prevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.3, 6.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.7, 6.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.3, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.9, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Prevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Prevotella</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.0, 6.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.4, 6.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.0, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">64.7, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RF16</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.180, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.299, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.186, 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.268, 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S24-7</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.07, 0.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.758, 0.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.585, 0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.325, 0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cyanobacteria</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0804, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0968, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.17, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.88</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fibrobacteres</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.58, 3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.45, 3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.48, 3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.55, 3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fibrobacteres</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Fibrobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.58, 3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.45, 3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.48, 3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.55, 3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fibrobacteres</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Fibrobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Fibrobacter</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.58, 3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.45, 3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.48, 3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.55, 3.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.20, 1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.00, 1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.85, 1.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.75, 1.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.98, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.11, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.27, 1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.04, 1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Asteroleplasma</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.56, 1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.151, 1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.565, 1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.31, 1.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RFN20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.34, 0.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.655, 0.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.562, 0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.268, 0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sharpea</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0696, 0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.285, 0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.153, 0.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.44, 0.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.09, 0.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.547, 0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.17, 0.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.53, 0.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Butyrivibrio</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.266, 0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.161, 0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.469, 0.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.967, 0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospira</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0701, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0253, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.262, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.318, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.022</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Roseburia</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.571, 0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.166, 0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0379, 0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0210, 0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ruminococcaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.73, 0.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.931, 0.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.595, 0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.263, 0.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ruminococcaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Oscillospira</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.274, 0.095</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.239, 0.095</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0100, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0277, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.015</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ruminococcaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ruminococcus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.37, 0.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.575, 0.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.547, 0.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0985, 0.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.704, 0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.85, 0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.52, 0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.894, 0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.058</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Acidaminococcus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0524, 0.060</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.205, 0.060</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0349, 0.064</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0588, 0.063</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Megasphaera</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0826, 0.062</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0644, 0.062</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0324, 0.066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.226, 0.066</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Selenomonas</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.368, 0.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.10, 0.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.14, 0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.263, 0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.082</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succiniclasticum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.123, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.407, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.173, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.137, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proteobacteria</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.65, 2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.05, 2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.33, 2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.55, 2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proteobacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.64, 2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.01, 2.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.29, 2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.5, 2.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proteobacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ruminobacter</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00372, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0306, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.188, 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.336, 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proteobacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succinivibrio</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.73, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.57, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.748, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.06, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.52, 1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.91, 1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.84, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.71, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.071</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.060</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sphaerochaetaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.892, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.27, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.08, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.593, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sphaerochaetaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sphaerochaeta</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.892, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.27, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.08, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.593, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Spirochaetaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.63, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.644, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.73, 1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.09, 1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.080</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Spirochaetaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Treponema</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.62, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.644, 1.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.73, 1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.09, 1.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.080</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tenericutes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.611, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.50, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.346, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.625, 1.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tenericutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Anaeroplasmataceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.344, 0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.444, 0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.311, 0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.403, 0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tenericutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Anaeroplasmataceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Anaeroplasma</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.204, 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.436, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0408, 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0151, 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.057</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Verrucomicrobia</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.406, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.332, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.110, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.122, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.037</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Verrucomicrobia</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RFP12</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.396, 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.331, 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.108, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.121, 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.037</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.76</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN4">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>Taxa with relative abundances &#x0003E;0.1% for the 4 diet groups</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN5">
<label>b</label>
<p><italic>HSBM-TH, heat treated soybean meal and timothy hay; SBM-TH, soybean meal and timothy hay; HSBM-BP, heat treated soybean meal and beet pulp; SBM-BP, heat treated soybean meal and beet pulp</italic>.</p></fn>
<p><italic>Bolded p-values in tables are significant or trends</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>LS means &#x000B1; SE for percent relative abundances of bacterial taxa identified in the rumen solid fraction as differentiated by diet along with <italic>P</italic> values for the effects of protein source, fiber source, and the interaction of protein and fiber source<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN6">a</xref>,<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN7">b</xref></sup>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Taxonomic classification</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Diet</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><italic><bold>P</bold></italic> <bold>value</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Phylum</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Family</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Genus</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SBM-TH</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>HSBM-TH</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SBM-BP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>HSBM-BP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Protein</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fiber</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Protein &#x000D7; Fiber</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Euryarchaeota (domain Archaea)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.447, 0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.670, 0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.408, 0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.155, 0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Euryarchaeota (domain Archaea)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Methanomassiliicoccaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.436, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.666, 0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.165, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.129, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.021</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Euryarchaeota (domain Archaea)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Methanomassiliicoccaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">vadinCA11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.172, 0.071</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.160, 0.067</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0862, 0.071</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0730, 0.071</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Actinobacteria</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.334, 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.176, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0471, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0334, 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Actinobacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Coriobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.162, 0.067</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.144, 0.064</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0382, 0.067</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0310, 0.067</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.089</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Actinobacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Coriobacteriaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Olsenella</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.139, 0.061</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.140, 0.058</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0339, 0.061</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0268, 0.061</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.085</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.5, 5.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.3, 5.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.4, 5.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.9, 5.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.014</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS11</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0634, 0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0186, 0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0847, 0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.657, 0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Bacteroidaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.128, 0.038</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0147, 0.036</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00685, 0.038</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00233, 0.037</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.080</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Bacteroidaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">BF311</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.122, 0.038</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0103, 0.036</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00369, 0.038</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.000362, 0.038</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.092</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">p-2534-18B5</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0356, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.12, 1.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.34, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.78, 1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Paraprevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.77, 0.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.27, 0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.03, 0.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.16, 0.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Paraprevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">CF231</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.448, 0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.419, 0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.403, 0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.284, 0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Paraprevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">YRC22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.572, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.12, 0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.282, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.16, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.023</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Porphyromonadaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.167, 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.134, 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.130, 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.122, 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Prevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">60.0, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.9, 6.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.6, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.9, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.089</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Prevotellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Prevotella</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58.9, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.0, 6.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.1, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52.6, 7.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RF16</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.123, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.128, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0395, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.220, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteroidetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S24-7</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.20, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.03, 0.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.04, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.396, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0050</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cyanobacteria</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.199, 0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0954, 0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.06, 0.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.36, 0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Elusimicrobia</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0437, 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.221, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0297, 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00133, 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fibrobacteres</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.60, 3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.41, 3.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.1, 3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.23, 3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fibrobacteres</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Fibrobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.60, 3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.41, 3.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.1, 3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.23, 3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fibrobacteres</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Fibrobacteraceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Fibrobacter</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.60, 3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.41, 3.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.1, 3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.23, 3.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.3, 1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.93, 1.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.67, 1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.65, 1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0054</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Clostridiaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.341, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.268, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0380, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0293, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0094</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Clostridiaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Clostridium</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.341, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.268, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0380, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0293, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0094</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.13, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.83, 1.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.48, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.04, 1.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.088</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Asteroleplasma</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.808, 0.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0383, 0.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.287, 0.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.377, 0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RFN20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.730, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.536, 0.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.396, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.134, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sharpea</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.56, 0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.16, 0.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.766, 0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.470, 0.868</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.37, 0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.59, 0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.66, 0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.62, 0.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.39</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Butyrivibrio</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.63, 0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.927, 0.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.797, 0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.850, 0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Coprococcus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0478, 0.030</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.107, 0.028</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00635, 0.030</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0447, 0.030</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.73</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lachnospira</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0128, 0.054</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0035, 0.051</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.163, 0.054</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.148, 0.054</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0049</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lactobacillaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.221, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.100, 0.099</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0200, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00124, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lactobacillaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Lactobacillus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.221, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.100, 0.099</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0200, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00124, 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ruminococcaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.985, 0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.15, 0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.297, 0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.443, 0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.064</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ruminococcaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ruminococcus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.880, 0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.04, 0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.176, 0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.300, 0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.048</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.45, 0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.36, 0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.768, 0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.644, 0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.016</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Acidaminococcus</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.314, 0.074</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.236, 0.070</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.137, 0.074</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0965, 0.074</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.041</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Megasphaera</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.242, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0261, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0433, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0136, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Mitsuokella</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.158, 0.050</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.118, 0.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0835, 0.050</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.145, 0.050</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Selenomonas</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.200, 0.099</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.313, 0.094</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.221, 0.099</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0727, 0.099</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Firmicutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Veillonellaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succiniclasticum</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.486, 0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.637, 0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.149, 0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.163, 0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0099</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Planctomycetes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.232, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00466, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0475, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00170, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Planctomycetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Pirellulaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.232, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00466, 0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0475, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00170, 0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proteobacteria</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.63, 0.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.44, 0.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.862, 0.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.23, 0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proteobacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.55, 0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.36, 0.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.827, 0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.20, 0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proteobacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Ruminobacter</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.220, 0.095</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0332, 0.090</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0569, 0.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0106, 0.095</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proteobacteria</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Succinivibrio</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.18, 0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.327, 0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.231, 0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.930, 0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.69, 6.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.62, 5.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.6, 6.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.7, 6.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.013</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sphaerochaetaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.212, 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.196, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.571, 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.239, 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sphaerochaetaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Sphaerochaeta</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.212, 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.196, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.571, 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.239, 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Spirochaetaceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.50, 6.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.42, 5.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.1, 6.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.5, 6.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.015</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spirochaetes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Spirochaetaceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Treponema</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.48, 6.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.42, 5.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.1, 6.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.5, 6.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.015</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SR1</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.421, 0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.420, 0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.422, 0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.426, 0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tenericutes</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.749, 0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.51, 0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.450, 0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.244, 0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.083</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tenericutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Anaeroplasmataceae</italic></td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.442, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.645, 0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.166, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.121, 0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.020</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.47</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tenericutes</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Anaeroplasmataceae</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>Anaeroplasma</italic></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.401, 0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.644, 0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0866, 0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0159, 0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0081</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN6">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>Taxa with relative abundances &#x0003E;0.1% for the 4 diet groups</italic>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TN7">
<label>b</label>
<p><italic>SBM-TH, heat treated soybean meal and timothy hay; SBM-TH, soybean meal and timothy hay; HSBM-BP, heat treated soybean meal and beet pulp; SBM-BP, heat treated soybean meal and beet pulp</italic>.</p></fn>
<p><italic>Bolded p-values in tables are significant or trends</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Phylum-level composition of bacteria identified in the rumen fluid fraction as differentiated by diet. The category &#x0201C;Other&#x0201D; is comprised of taxa with relative abundances &#x0003C; 1.0% for all diets. <bold>(B)</bold> Phylum-level composition of bacteria identified in the rumen solid fraction as differentiated by diet. The category &#x0201C;Other&#x0201D; is comprised of taxa with relative abundances &#x0003C; 1.0% for all diets.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fanim-02-745848-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Family-level composition of bacteria identified in the rumen fluid fraction as differentiated by diet. The category &#x0201C;Other&#x0201D; is comprised of taxa with relative abundances &#x0003C; 1.0% for all diets. <bold>(B)</bold> Family-level composition of bacteria identified in the rumen solid fraction as differentiated by diet. The category &#x0201C;Other&#x0201D; is comprised of taxa with relative abundances &#x0003C; 1.0% for all diets.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fanim-02-745848-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Genus-level composition of bacteria identified in the rumen fluid fraction as differentiated by diet. The category &#x0201C;Other&#x0201D; is comprised of taxa with relative abundances &#x0003C; 1.0% for all diets. <bold>(B)</bold> Genus-level composition of bacteria identified in the rumen solid fraction as differentiated by diet. The category &#x0201C;Other&#x0201D; is comprised of taxa with relative abundances &#x0003C; 1.0% for all diets.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fanim-02-745848-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec>
<title>Fiber Effects on Bacterial Composition</title>
<p>Bacteroidetes and its family S24-7 increased (<italic>P</italic> = 0.014 and <italic>P</italic> = 0.0050, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>) in animals receiving the TH treatment compared to those on the BP treatment. Two additional Bacteroidetes families, <italic>Bacteroidaceae</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae</italic>, tended to be more prominent in response to the TH treatment (<italic>P</italic> = 0.089 and <italic>P</italic> = 0.080, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>) as well as two genera, BF311 (<italic>P</italic> = 0.092; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>) and YRC22 (<italic>P</italic> = 0.052; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). Similarly, Firmicutes was more abundant on the TH treatment than on BP (<italic>P</italic> = 0.0054; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>), as were its families <italic>Clostridiaceae</italic> and <italic>Veillonellaceae</italic> (<italic>P</italic> = 0.0094 and <italic>P</italic> = 0.016, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). <italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic> and <italic>Ruminococcaceae</italic> populations tended to be less abundant on BP as well (<italic>P</italic> = 0.088 and <italic>P</italic> = 0.064, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The Firmicutes genera <italic>Acidaminococcus, Clostridium, Oscillospira, Ruminococcus</italic>, and <italic>Succiniclasticum</italic> decreased in abundance (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Tables 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>) in response to BP treatment. Population decreases associated with BP were also observed in Verrucomicrobia and its family RFP12 (<italic>P</italic> = 0.037 and <italic>P</italic> = 0.037, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) and in the Tenericutes family <italic>Anaeroplasmataceae</italic> and its genus <italic>Anaeroplasma</italic> (<italic>P</italic> = 0.020 and <italic>P</italic> = 0.0081, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Tenericutes itself, along with the family <italic>Coriobacteriaceae</italic>, and <italic>Coriobacteriaceae&#x00027;s</italic> genus <italic>Olsenella</italic> tended to be less abundant on BP compared to the TH treatment (<italic>P</italic> = 0.083, <italic>P</italic> = 0.089, and <italic>P</italic> = 0.085, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). <italic>Methanomassiliicoccaceae</italic> also exhibited a population decline when BP diets were fed (<italic>P</italic> = 0.021; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The phylum Spirochaetes increased in abundance on the BP treatment compared to TH (<italic>P</italic> = 0.013; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). The family <italic>Spirochaetaceae</italic> and genus <italic>Treponema</italic> reflected this effect as well (<italic>P</italic> = 0.015). The Firmicutes genus <italic>Lachnospira</italic> was also observed to increase on the BP treatment (<italic>P</italic> = 0.0049; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Protein Effects on Bacterial Composition</title>
<p>Few changes in bacterial community composition were observed when protein source was varied, contrasting with the numerous population shifts associated with differences in fiber source. The phylum Spirochaetes tended to increase on SBM compared to HSBM (<italic>P</italic> = 0.071; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). The <italic>Paraprevotellaceae</italic> genus YRC22 was observed to increase in abundance on HSBM diets, and this effect was consistent both in the fluid fraction (<italic>P</italic> = 0.0072, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>) and solid fraction (<italic>P</italic> = 0.023; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Richness and Diversity Responses</title>
<p>Richness and diversity of the rumen microbiome varied with fiber source, but not protein source. Shannon diversity of the solid fraction samples was greater in animals consuming TH compared to BP (<italic>P</italic> = 0.0027; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>). The number of OTUs identified tended to increase on TH diets compared to BP diets (<italic>P</italic> = 0.051; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption><p>LS means &#x000B1; SE for alpha diversity metrics of the bacterial community identified in the rumen fluid and solid fractions as differentiated by diet along with <italic>P</italic> values for the effects of protein source, fiber source, and the interaction of protein and fiber source<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TN8"><sup>a</sup></xref>.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Diet</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><italic><bold>P</bold></italic> <bold>value</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Measurement</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SBM-TH</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>HSBM-TH</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>SBM-BP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>HSBM-BP</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Protein</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Fiber</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Protein &#x000D7; Fiber</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Fluid fraction</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Observed OTUs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">167, 23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">172, 23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">152, 24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">153, 24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shannon diversity</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.73, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.11, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.62, 0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.7, 0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"><bold>Solid fraction</bold></td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Observed OTUs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">229, 30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">207, 28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">176, 30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">154, 29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.051</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Shannon diversity</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.62, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.78, 0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.87, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.85, 0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><bold>0.0027</bold></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.75</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TN8">
<label>a</label>
<p><italic>HSBM-TH, heat treated soybean meal and timothy hay; SBM-TH, soybean meal and timothy hay; HSBM-BP, heat treated soybean meal and beet pulp; SBM-BP, heat treated soybean meal and beet pulp; OTUs, operational taxonomic units</italic>.</p></fn>
<p><italic>Bolded p-values in tables are significant or trends</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>Bacterial Population Shifts Associated With Fiber Source</title>
<p>The majority of microbial variation due to fiber source was identified in the solid ruminal fraction compared to the fluid fraction. This was unsurprising given that fibrolytic activity would be most prominent in the fiber mat of the rumen. Fibrolytic activities are abundant within the Bacteroidetes phylum (Terrapon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2015</xref>). Because Bacteroidetes is generally the most prominent phylum in the rumen and cellulose is the main energy source of ruminants (Ensminger et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">1990</xref>), it is logical that this bacterial group would be sensitive to changes in the fiber substrate provided. The responses to alterations in fiber source demonstrated by Bacteroidetes, its families S24-7, <italic>Bacteroidaceae</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae</italic>, and its genera BF311 and YRC22 that we observed are consistent with this logic. <italic>Bacteroidaceae, Prevotellaceae</italic> and S24-7 are known to be involved in digestion of fiber (Lan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2006</xref>; Ivarsson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2014</xref>; Gamage et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2018</xref>). Even though the <italic>Bacteroidaceae</italic> genus BF311&#x00027;s substrate preferences have yet to be fully characterized (Bi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2018</xref>), observations of increased abundance in goats when hay was fed also support an involvement in forage fiber degradation (Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2018</xref>). The same experiment reported similar behavior of YRC22 (Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2018</xref>). Our observations of fiber effects on Bacteroidetes and its family S24-7, as well as tendencies for <italic>Prevotellaceae, Bacteroidaceae</italic>, BF311, and YRC22 to be affected by fiber source may reflect their known (or probable) functional roles and indicate sensitivity to changes in their substrate.</p>
<p>Like Bacteroidetes, the Firmicutes phylum was more abundant on the TH treatment than on BP and the population shifts that we observed in its members are logical given what is currently known about their substrate preferences. <italic>Ruminococcus</italic> and <italic>Clostridium</italic>, both Firmicutes genera, have been established as prominent fiber digesters in the rumen (Preston and Leng, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">1987</xref>; Chesson and Forsberg, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">1997</xref>). <italic>Oscillospira</italic> and <italic>Succiniclasticum</italic> are also cellulolytic and have been shown to increase as the dietary forage-to-concentrate ratio increases (Mackie et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">2003</xref>; Han et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2019</xref>). Additionally, fiber has been shown to stimulate <italic>Acidaminococcus</italic> populations <italic>in vitro</italic> (Gong et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2019</xref>). Although we only observed a tendency of the family <italic>Erysipelotrichaceae</italic> to increase on TH, previous research has demonstrated greater prominence of this family in cattle consuming hay as a forage source compared to corn silage or grass silage (Deusch et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2017</xref>). Our results serve to further underscore the sensitivity of these taxa to changes in their fiber substrate.</p>
<p>Our observations of the responses of Actinobacteria, Tenericutes, and Verrucomicrobia members to changes in fiber source parallel similar findings in the literature. The Verrucomicrobia family RFP12 has been shown to decrease in abundance as dietary forage content is decreased (Plaizier et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">2017</xref>). <italic>Anaeroplasma</italic>, a Tenericutes genus, has been correlated with fiber digestion (Niu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2015</xref>), and <italic>Olsenella</italic>, an Actinobacteria genus, has been suggested to participate prominently in the degradation of ryegrass (Huws et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2016</xref>). Our results indicate that these taxa are more strongly associated with the degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose in forages than with the degradation of soluble fiber in beet pulp. The behavior of <italic>Methanomassiliicoccaceae</italic> in response to forage or fiber content appears to be less clear. The sole Archaeal family in our report, <italic>Methanomassiliicoccaceae</italic> has been reported to decrease in abundance when dietary forage level was reduced (Zhu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2018</xref>), but has also been observed to increase as forage fiber was replaced with wheat bran and soy hulls as non-forage fiber sources (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2018</xref>), in direct contradiction to our findings. Additional work is necessary to fully characterize the effects of forage fiber vs. non-forage fiber on <italic>Methanomassiliicoccaceae</italic>.</p>
<p>Contrasting with the previous taxa mentioned above, the phylum Spirochaetes was approximately 3 to 4 times more abundant in animals on the BP treatment compared to those receiving TH. The effect was demonstrated by its family <italic>Spirochaetaceae</italic> and genus <italic>Treponema</italic> as well. The Firmicutes genus <italic>Lachnospira</italic> was the only other taxonomic group displaying a population increase in association with the BP treatment rather than a decrease. This response is most likely due to the high pectin content of beet pulp (Codling and Woodman, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1929</xref>). <italic>Treponema</italic> and <italic>Lachnospira</italic> are both known to be involved in pectin degradation (Wojciechowicz and Zio&#x00142;ecki, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">1979</xref>; Kasperowicz, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">1994</xref>). Previous research has also demonstrated increased abundances of these genera in response to stimulation by pectin (Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2015</xref>; Bang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2018</xref>), and according to Liu et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2015</xref>), ruminal <italic>Treponema</italic> populations were &#x0201C;remarkably supported&#x0201D; by the provision of pectin. The positive responses we observed in these taxa provide further evidence of their sensitivity to pectin content and broadly underscore the significance of substrate availability in influencing microbial population shifts.</p>
<p>Numerous investigations have evaluated the effects of hay inclusion on the rumen microbial community within the context of comparing different forage-to-concentrate ratios (Fernando et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2010</xref>; Hook et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2011</xref>; Klevenhusen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2017</xref>; Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2017</xref>). The recurring theme throughout these studies is that fibrolytic bacterial populations increase when forage content is increased, in agreement with our observations. Comparatively less research attention, however, has been dedicated to rumen microbial changes on beet pulp-based diets and to our knowledge, no studies have utilized BP as a replacement for forage in the diet and compared differences in the microbial profiles. Studies have instead focused on using BP as a high-fiber/low-starch energy source to replace starchy concentrate feeds (Zhao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2013</xref>; M&#x000FC;nnich et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2018</xref>). Nonetheless, these studies have still observed reductions in fiber-degrading bacterial populations in response to BP treatment, which is consistent with our findings (Zhao et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2013</xref>; M&#x000FC;nnich et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2018</xref>). These results suggest that the optimal type of fiber substrate likely differs between various bacterial populations involved in its breakdown and that fibrolytic species may not be supported as adequately by non-forage fiber sources. This highlights the need for future ruminant nutrition work to move away from broad classification of nutrients and toward characterizing specific substrate supplies.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Bacterial Population Shifts Associated With Protein Source</title>
<p>In contrast to the microbial responses associated with fiber type, very little microbial variation was evident when protein source was varied. Major taxa associated with ruminal protein degradation, including <italic>Butyrivibrio, Prevotella</italic>, and <italic>Ruminobacter</italic> (Mackie et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">2001</xref>; McDonald et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2011</xref>) displayed similar relative abundances across diet treatments, appearing to indicate no sensitivity to the provision of heat-treated vs. non-treated SBM. The sole population shift that we observed was that of the <italic>Paraprevotellaceae</italic> genus YRC22, which increased in abundance on the HSBM treatment compared to SBM. A tendency for the Spirochaetes phylum to increase in abundance on SBM was also noted. These responses may be evidence of involvement in protein metabolism. Some members of Spirochaetes have been observed to produce enzymes with roles in peptide degradation, including trypsin, chymotrypsin, and arylamidases (Nordhoff et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">2005</xref>; Newbrook et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2017</xref>). Because our observed shift in Spirochaetes was quite minimal, however, more research is necessary to clarify the sensitivity of this phylum to changes in protein source. YRC22 has been described as a minor genus with relatively unknown function (Zhu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2018</xref>). Previous research has identified a strong correlation between YRC22 abundance and concentrations of certain amino acids in rumen fluid, leading investigators to conclude this genus may be involved in their metabolism to some degree (Hua et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2017</xref>). The sensitivity of YRC22 to changes in protein source that we observed provides additional evidence of a potential link with the processing or utilization of protein and, along with its response to our fiber treatments, underscores the need for further investigation of this genus.</p>
<p>As explained above, our protein treatments were represented by SBM and heated SBM. Treating SBM with heat leads to denaturation of proteins, which may decrease their solubility and slow their ruminal degradation rate (Russell et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">1992</xref>). Decreased ruminal availability of SBM protein due to heat treatment is well documented in both cattle (Plegge et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">1985</xref>; Lj&#x000F8;kjel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2000</xref>; Borucki Castro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2007</xref>) and sheep (Glimp et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">1967</xref>; Demjanec et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">1995</xref>), but very little research has investigated the impacts on rumen microbial populations. Plegge et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">1985</xref>) reported that heat treatment of SBM did not impact rumen bacterial protein synthesis efficiency or bacterial nitrogen flow, but no information of the effects on the microbial populations themselves was available. Investigators evaluating the substitution of SBM with dried distillers grains with solubles (<bold>DDGS</bold>) observed no rumen bacterial population changes in cattle (Castillo-Lopez et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">2017</xref>) or sheep (Shen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">2020</xref>). Although this protein source substitution differed from our experiment, it bears the similarity that DDGS possesses a higher proportion of rumen-undegradable protein (<bold>RUP</bold>) to rumen-degradable protein (<bold>RDP</bold>) compared to SBM (NRC, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2016</xref>). The results of these studies and ours indicate that the rumen microbiome is resistant to change in terms of population dynamics due to heat treating SBM or substituting it with another protein feed. Additionally, the high amount of CP present in our diets made it unlikely that the animals were deficient in RDP. This provides another reason for the lack of sensitivity to protein source that we observed.</p>
<p>Overall, our investigation was unable to detect widespread change in bacterial population dynamics due to protein source. A similar observation was made by Gong et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2019</xref>), who reported that gut microbial growth patterns displayed a weaker correlation with protein than with carbohydrates. Aside from the likely absence of RDP-deficient conditions in our study, the limited overall effect of protein source on the rumen microbial community compared to fiber source may be due to the fact that plant fiber is the main nutrient source that the rumen microbiome has evolved to process and that vast numbers of rumen bacterial taxa are directly involved in fibrolytic activities (Hobson and Stewart, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1997</xref>). Additionally, rumen bacteria have the capability of utilizing recycled urea as a source of nitrogen for synthesizing their own microbial proteins (McDonald et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2011</xref>). It is therefore possible that the microbiome is comparatively less sensitive to changes in dietary protein solubility than it is to variations in fiber characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Microbial Richness, Diversity, and Links With Productive Efficiency</title>
<p>While unchanged by protein source, Shannon diversity of the microbiome was observed to decrease in response to the BP treatment compared to the TH treatment. Similarly, the number of identified OTUs tended to be lower on the BP treatment. The number of OTUs is an indication of species richness of the microbiome whereas Shannon diversity is a measure of species representation. Previous reports have found that richness and diversity may be sensitive to diet forage-to-concentrate ratio, with richness and diversity greatest on forage diets and lowest at high levels of concentrate feeding (Petri et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2013</xref>; Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2017</xref>). Our results indicate that the type of fiber source, rather than just fiber concentrations, may also influence these metrics because we balanced our experimental diets to have similar concentrations of NDF. The decline in Shannon diversity and the tendency for the number of OTUs to decline with BP treatment also appears to mirror the bacterial population decreases associated with the BP diets discussed above.</p>
<p>Lower levels of richness and diversity have been linked with increased feed efficiency and reduced methane production in cattle (Shabat et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2016</xref>). According to Shabat et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2016</xref>), efficient rumen microbiomes are composed of a smaller number of more dominant taxa that utilize a narrower range of metabolic pathways and produce metabolites that are more closely aligned with the energetic needs of the host. Less efficient microbiomes can be characterized by more diverse populations that employ a wide range of metabolic pathways, some of them resulting in greater energy loss, such as through methane production (Shabat et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">2016</xref>). Methane represents wasted dietary energy for the animal as it cannot be absorbed and also contributes to agricultural greenhouse gas emissions (Johnson and Ward, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">1996</xref>). The reduction in abundance of the methanogen family <italic>Methanomassiliicoccaceae</italic> that we observed may be further evidence that substituting TH with BP could potentially shift the microbiome in a more energetically efficient direction. This family is poorly characterized, however, and additional research is necessary to clarify its contribution to ruminant methane production (Huang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2016</xref>). Two bacterial taxa that were also observed to decrease in abundance on BP diets, <italic>Clostridium</italic> and <italic>Succiniclasticum</italic>, have been previously linked with poor feed efficiency in growing steers (Hernandez-Sanabria et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2012</xref>; Myer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2015</xref>). Because we utilized mature wethers in our experiment and measuring emissions was outside our study scope, further work will be needed to confirm if the taxonomic shifts we observed would result in improved growth efficiency and lower methane production.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>In this study, we sought to explore rumen microbial responses to differing dietary sources of fiber and protein and, in doing so, further the understanding of the complex relationship between the rumen microbiome and diet. The responses we observed indicate that nutrient source, rather than simply nutrient concentration, exerts a marked impact on bacterial population dynamics in the ovine rumen microbiome. Additional research is required to determine if the differing nutrient sources utilized in our study and their subsequent influence on the rumen microbiome may translate into biologically and economically relevant alterations in livestock performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The datasets generated for this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI (accession: <ext-link ext-link-type="DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank" xlink:href="PRJNA753122">PRJNA753122</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Ethics Statement</title>
<p>The animal study was reviewed and approved by Virginia Tech Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>CG was responsible for animal monitoring, sample collection, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. RS conducted all bioinformatics analyses. LB assisted with experiment execution and contributed to manuscript editing. RW served as the study&#x00027;s principal investigator, securing necessary funds and determining study design. RW also contributed substantially to manuscript editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s9">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was supported by funding from the U.S. Department of Agriculture&#x02014;National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2017-05943).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>

<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amir</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Navas-Molina</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kopylova</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morton</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zech Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Deblur rapidly resolves single-nucleotide community sequence patterns</article-title>. <source>mSystems</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>e00191</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>e00116</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00191-16</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28289731</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bang</surname> <given-names>S.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>J.-E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kum</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The influence of in vitro pectin fermentation on the human fecal microbiome</article-title>. <source>AMB Exp</source>. <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>98</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13568-018-0629-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29909506</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bergman</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Rev</source>. <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>567</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>590</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/physrev.1990.70.2.567</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2181501</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary energy levels on rumen bacterial community composition in <italic>Holstein heifers</italic> under the same forage to concentrate ratio condition</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol</source>. <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>69</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-018-1213-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29996759</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bolyen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rideout</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dillon</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bokulich</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abnet</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Ghalith</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol</source>. <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>852</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>857</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31399723</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Borucki Castro</surname> <given-names>S. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Phillip</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lapierre</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jardon</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berthiaume</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of protein and amino acids in treated soybean meal products</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci</source>. <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>810</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>822</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71565-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17235158</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Callaway</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dowd</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edrington</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krueger</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bauer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of bacterial diversity in the rumen and feces of cattle fed different levels of dried distillers grains plus solubles using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>3977</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3983</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/jas.2010-2900</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20729286</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Carberry</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kenny</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCabe</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waters</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effect of phenotypic residual feed intake and dietary forage content on the rumen microbial community of beef cattle</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>4949</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4958</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.07759-11</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22562991</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Castillo-Lopez</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>C. J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aluthge</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tom</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kononoff</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The effect of regular or reduced-fat distillers grains with solubles on rumen methanogenesis and the rumen bacterial community</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol</source>. <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>1381</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1395</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.13583</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28891118</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chesson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forsberg</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Polysaccharide degradation by rumen microorganisms,</article-title> in <source>The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem</source> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Chapman and Hall</publisher-name>), <fpage>329</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>381</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25501482</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Codling</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woodman</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1929</year>). <article-title>Sugar-beet pulp as a source of pectin</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci</source>. <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>701</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>714</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859600013411</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>de Menezes</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;Donovan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;Neill</surname> <given-names>B. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clipson</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doyle</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Microbiome analysis of dairy cows fed pasture or total mixed ration diets</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol</source>. <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>256</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>265</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01151.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21671962</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Demjanec</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merchen</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cremin</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aldrich</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berger</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Effect of roasting on site and extent of digestion of soybean meal by sheep: I. Digestion of nitrogen and amino acids</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>824</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>834</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/1995.733824x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7608017</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>DePeters</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fadel</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arosemena</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Digestion kinetics of neutral detergent fiber and chemical composition within some selected by-product feedstuffs</article-title>. <source>Anim. Feed Sci. Technol</source>. <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>140</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0377-8401(96)01145-5</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>DeSantis</surname> <given-names>T. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hugenholtz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rojas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brodie</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>5069</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5072</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.03006-05</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16820507</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Deusch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Camarinha-Silva</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Conrad</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beifuss</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodehutscord</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seifert</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>A structural and functional elucidation of the rumen microbiome influenced by various diets and microenvironments</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol</source>. <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>1605</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.01605</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28883813</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ensminger</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oldfield</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Heinemann</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <source>Feeds and Nutrition. 2nd ed</source>. <publisher-loc>Clovis, CA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>The Ensminger Publishing Company</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Estaki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bokulich</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gonz&#x000E1;lez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kosciolek</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>QIIME 2 enables comprehensive end-to-end analysis of diverse microbiome data and comparative studies with publicly available data</article-title>. <source>Curr. Protoc. Bioinform.</source> <volume>70</volume>:<fpage>e100</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cpbi.100</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32343490</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fernando</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Purvis</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Najar</surname> <given-names>F. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sukharnikov</surname> <given-names>L. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krehbiel</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagaraja</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>7482</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>7490</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00388-10</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20851965</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gamage</surname> <given-names>H. K. A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tetu</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chong</surname> <given-names>R. W. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bucio-Noble</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rosewarne</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Fiber supplements derived from sugarcane stem, wheat dextrin and Psyllium husk have different in vitro effects on the human gut microbiota</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol</source>. <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>1618</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01618</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30072976</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gleason</surname> <given-names>C. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>White</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Variation in animal performance explained by the rumen microbiome or by diet composition</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>4658</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4673</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jas/sky332</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30124869</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Glimp</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karr</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Little</surname> <given-names>C. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woolfolk</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hudson</surname> <given-names>L. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1967</year>). <article-title>Effect of reducing soybean protein solubility by dry heat on the protein utilization of young lambs</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>858</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>861</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/jas1967.264858x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5624624</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>In vitro fermentabilities of whole wheat as compared with refined wheat in different cultivars</article-title>. <source>J. Funct. Foods</source>. <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>505</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>515</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jff.2018.11.027</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effect of dietary concentrate to forage ratios on ruminal bacterial and anaerobic fungal populations of cashmere goats</article-title>. <source>Anaerobe</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>118</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>125</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.06.010</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31228671</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hernandez-Sanabria</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goonewardene</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Durunna</surname> <given-names>O. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Impact of feed efficiency and diet on adaptive variations in the bacterial community in the rumen fluid of cattle</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>1203</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1214</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.05114-11</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22156428</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hobson</surname> <given-names>P. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <source>The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem</source>. <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Chapman and Hall</publisher-name>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hook</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Steele</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Northwood</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dijkstra</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>France</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>A. D. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Impact of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) adaptation and recovery on the density and diversity of bacteria in the rumen of dairy cows</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol</source>. <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>275</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>284</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01154.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21692816</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hua</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cong</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Feeding a high concentration diet induces unhealthy alterations in the composition and metabolism of ruminal microbiota and host response in a goat model</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>138</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.00138</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28210249</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martinez-Fernandez</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Padmanabha</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Denman</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McSweeney</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Methanogen diversity in indigenous and introduced ruminant species on the Tibetan Plateau</article-title>. <source>Archaea</source>. <volume>2016</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2016/5916067</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27274707</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hungate</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bryant</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mah</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1964</year>). <article-title>The rumen bacteria and protozoa</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Microbiol</source>. <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>166</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.mi.18.100164.001023</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14268853</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hurvich</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>C.-L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Regression and time series model selection in small samples</article-title>. <source>Biometrika</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>297</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>307</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/biomet/76.2.297</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huws</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Creevey</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rees Stevens</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Girdwood</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Temporal dynamics of the metabolically active rumen bacteria colonizing fresh perennial ryegrass</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>92</volume>:<fpage>fiv137</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fiv137</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26542074</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Indugu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vecchiarelli</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanamala</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pitta</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Comparison of rumen bacterial communities in dairy herds of different production</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol</source>. <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>190</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-017-1098-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28854878</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ivarsson</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Roos</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindberg</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Fermentable non-starch polysaccharides increases the abundance of Bacteroides&#x02013;Prevotella&#x02013;Porphyromonas in ileal microbial community of growing pigs</article-title>. <source>Animal</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1777</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1787</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1751731114001827</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25046106</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jewell</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McCormick</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Odt</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weimer</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Ruminal bacterial community composition in dairy cows is dynamic over the course of two lactations and correlates with feed efficiency</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>4697</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4710</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00720-15</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25934629</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Estimates of animal methane emissions</article-title>. <source>Environ. Monit. Assess</source>. <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>133</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>141</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00394046</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24193497</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kasperowicz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Comparison of utilization of pectins from various sources by pure cultures of pectinolytic rumen bacteria and mixed cultures of rumen microorganisms</article-title>. <source>Acta Microbiol. Pol</source>. <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>56</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7526615</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klevenhusen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Petri</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kleefisch</surname> <given-names>M.-T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khiaosa-ard</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Metzler-Zebeli</surname> <given-names>B. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zebeli</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Changes in fibre-adherent and fluid-associated microbial communities and fermentation profiles in the rumen of cattle fed diets differing in hay quality and concentrate amount</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <fpage>93</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fix100</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28922800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krause</surname> <given-names>D. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nagaraja</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>A. D. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Callaway</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Board-invited review: Rumen microbiology: leading the way in microbial ecology</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>331</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>341</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/jas.2012-5567</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23404990</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lan</surname> <given-names>N. P. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sakamoto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sakata</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Benno</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacteroides barnesiae</italic> sp. nov., <italic>Bacteroides salanitronis</italic> sp. nov. and <italic>Bacteroides gallinarum</italic> sp. nov., isolated from chicken caecum</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol</source>. <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>2853</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2859</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.64517-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17158987</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lima</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oikonomou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lima</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bicalho</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ganda</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>de Oliveira Filho</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Prepartum and postpartum rumen fluid microbiomes: characterization and correlation with production traits in dairy cows</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>1327</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1337</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.03138-14</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25501481</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>Y.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.-K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.-X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Pectin induces an in vitro rumen microbial population shift attributed to the pectinolytic Treponema group</article-title>. <source>Curr. Microbiol</source>. <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00284-014-0672-y</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25178631</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lj&#x000F8;kjel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harstad</surname> <given-names>O. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Skrede</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Effect of heat treatment of soybean meal and fish meal on amino acid digestibility in mink and dairy cows</article-title>. <source>Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>83</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>95</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00104-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mackie</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aminov</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klieve</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ouwerkerk</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sundset</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Ecology of uncultivated Oscillospira species in the rumen of cattle, sheep, and reindeer as assessed by microscopy and molecular approaches</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>6808</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6815</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.69.11.6808-6815.2003</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14602644</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mackie</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McSweeney</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aminov</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Rumen,</article-title> in <source>Encyclopedia of Life Sciences</source>, ed <person-group person-group-type="editor"><collab>John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.</collab></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Chichester</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley and Sons, Ltd</publisher-name>), a0000404. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/npg.els.0000404</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Greenhalgh</surname> <given-names>J. F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sinclair</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Animal Nutrition. 7th edn</source>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Pearson</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McLoughlin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Spillane</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Claffey</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;Rourke</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diskin</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Rumen microbiome composition is altered in sheep divergent in feed efficiency</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol</source>. <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1981</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.01981</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32983009</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Min</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gurung</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shange</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Solaiman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Potential role of rumen microbiota in altering average daily gain and feed efficiency in meat goats fed simple and mixed pastures using bacterial tag-encoded FLX amplicon pyrosequencing</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>97</volume>:<fpage>3523</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3534</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jas/skz193</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31214714</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mullins</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mamedova</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carpenter</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ying</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoon</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Analysis of rumen microbial populations in lactating dairy cattle fed diets varying in carbohydrate profiles and <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> fermentation product</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci</source>. <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>5872</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5881</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2013-6775</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23849646</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>M&#x000FC;nnich</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khol-Parisini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klevenhusen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Metzler-Zebeli</surname> <given-names>B. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zebeli</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Graded replacement of maize grain with molassed sugar beet pulp modulated ruminal microbial community and fermentation profile in vitro: sugar beet pulp, rumen microbiota and fermentation in vitro</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food Agric</source>. <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>991</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>997</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.8547</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28722751</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Myer</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wells</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuehn</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Freetly</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Rumen microbiome from steers differing in feed efficiency</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e0129174</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0129174</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26030887</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Newbrook</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Staton</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clegg</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Birtles</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carter</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title><italic>Treponema ruminis</italic> sp. nov., a spirochaete isolated from the bovine rumen</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol</source>. <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1349</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1354</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijsem.0.001812</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28113049</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Dynamic distribution of the gut microbiota and the relationship with apparent crude fiber digestibility and growth stages in pigs</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep</source>. <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>9938</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep09938</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25898122</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nordhoff</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taras</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macha</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tedin</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Busse</surname> <given-names>H.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wieler</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title><italic>Treponema berlinense</italic> sp. nov. and <italic>Treponema porcinum</italic> sp. nov., novel spirochaetes isolated from porcine faeces</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol</source>. <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>1675</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1680</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.63388-0</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16014500</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>NRC</collab></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 8th edn.</source> <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>National Academies Press</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petri</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mapiye</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dugan</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAllister</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Subcutaneous adipose fatty acid profiles and related rumen bacterial populations of steers fed red clover or grass hay diets containing flax or sunflower-seed</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>e104167</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0104167</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25093808</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Petri</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwaiger</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Penner</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beauchemin</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McKinnon</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Characterization of the core rumen microbiome in cattle during transition from forage to concentrate as well as during and after an acidotic challenge</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e83424</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0083424</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24391765</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pinheiro</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DebRoy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sarkar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <collab>R Core Team.</collab></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme</ext-link> (accessed October 01, 2020).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Plaizier</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Danscher</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Derakshani</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khafipour</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Changes in microbiota in rumen digesta and feces due to a grain-based subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) challenge</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol</source>. <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>485</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>495</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-017-0940-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28175972</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Plegge</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berger</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fahey</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Effect of roasting temperature on the proportion of soybean meal nitrogen escaping degradation in the rumen</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>1211</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1218</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/jas1985.6151211x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Preston</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leng</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <source>Matching Ruminant Production Systems with Available Resources in the Tropics and Sub-tropics</source>. <publisher-loc>Armidale, N.S.W</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Penambul Books</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>R Core Team</collab></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing</source>. <publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Russell</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>O&#x00027;Connor</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Soest</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sniffen</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: I. Ruminal fermentation</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci</source>. <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>3551</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3561</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/1992.70113551x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1459918</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shabat</surname> <given-names>B. S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sasson</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doron-Faigenboim</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Durman</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yaacoby</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg Miller</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants</article-title>. <source>ISME J</source>. <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>2958</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2972</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2016.62</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27152936</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary replacement of soybean meal with dried distillers grains with solubles on the microbiota occupying different ecological niches in the rumen of growing Hu lambs</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol</source>. <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>93</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40104-020-00499-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32939263</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Storm</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x000D8;rskov</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smart</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants: 2. The apparent digestibility and net utilization of microbial N for growing lambs</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Nutr</source>. <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>471</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>478</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/BJN19830114</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6615775</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Terrapon</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lombard</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gilbert</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Henrissat</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Automatic prediction of polysaccharide utilization loci in Bacteroidetes species</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>647</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>655</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btu716</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25355788</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Soest</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci</source>. <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>3583</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3597</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1660498</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Shifts of hydrogen metabolism from methanogenesis to propionate production in response to replacement of forage fiber with non-forage fiber sources in diets in vitro</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol</source>. <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>2764</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.02764</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30524394</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wojciechowicz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zio&#x00142;ecki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Pectinolytic enzymes of large rumen treponemes</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>136</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>142</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.37.1.136-142.1979</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32839</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Identification of the potential role of the rumen microbiome in milk protein and fat synthesis in dairy cows using metagenomic sequencing</article-title>. <source>Animals</source>. <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1247</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11051247</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33926012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effect of dietary forage to concentrate ratios on dynamic profile changes and interactions of ruminal microbiota and metabolites in Holstein heifers</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol</source>. <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>2206</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02206</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29170660</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>High-grain diet feeding altered the composition and functions of the rumen bacterial community and caused the damage to the laminar tissues of goats</article-title>. <source>Animal</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>2511</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2520</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S175173111800040X</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29553005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effects of replacing dietary starch with neutral detergent-soluble fibre on ruminal fermentation, microbial synthesis and populations of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC)</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr</source>. <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>1161</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1169</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jpn.12025</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23278844</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kristensen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Difford</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Poulsen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noel</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abu Al-Soud</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Changes in rumen bacterial and archaeal communities over the transition period in primiparous Holstein dairy cows</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci</source>. <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>9847</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9862</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2017-14366</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30172409</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>

</back>
</article>