<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Agron.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Agronomy</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Agron.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-3218</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fagro.2025.1636711</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Agronomy</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The reduced-tillering trait (<italic>tin</italic>) is not beneficial under wheat cropping systems that allow for moderate to high water-limited yields</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mureddu</surname>
<given-names>Francesca</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Motzo</surname>
<given-names>Rosella</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/473975/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Badeck</surname>
<given-names>Franz-Werner</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/822035/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rizza</surname>
<given-names>Fulvia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Giunta</surname>
<given-names>Francesco</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/473977/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Agricultural Sciences, Unit &#x2018;Agronomia, Coltivazioni erbacee e Genetica&#x2019;, University of Sassari</institution>, <addr-line>Sassari</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Italy</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l&#x2019;Analisi dell&#x2019;Economia Agraria&#x2014;Centro di Ricerca Genomica e Bioinformatica (CREA-GB)</institution>, <addr-line>Fiorenzuola d&#x2019;Arda</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Italy</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/75444/overview">Aqeel Ahmad</ext-link>, University of Florida, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2140134/overview">Christopher Hernandez</ext-link>, University of New Hampshire, United States</p>
<p>Mustafa Cerit, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, T&#xfc;rkiye, in collaboration with reviewer CH</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3096537/overview">Celesyin Ukozehasi</ext-link>, University of Rwanda, Rwanda</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Rosella Motzo, <email xlink:href="mailto:motzo@uniss.it">motzo@uniss.it</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<elocation-id>1636711</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>31</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Mureddu, Motzo, Badeck, Rizza and Giunta.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Mureddu, Motzo, Badeck, Rizza and Giunta</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Reduced-tillering wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) lines carrying the <italic>tin</italic> (tiller inhibition) gene are characterized by high spike fertility and high grain weights. These traits may enable high yields under favorable climatic conditions, provided that the low tillering is offset by an adequate sowing rate. Field trials were conducted to evaluate the effect of the <italic>tin</italic> gene by comparing two pairs of near-isogenic lines (NILs), namely Janz &#xb1; <italic>tin</italic> and Kite &#xb1; <italic>tin</italic>, sown at a rate of 350 germinable seeds m<sup>-</sup>&#xb2; across six environments (two sites &#xd7; three years) in Italy (Sardinia and Emilia-Romagna). Seasonal rainfall (October&#x2013;May) ranged from 311 to 784 mm, corresponding to mean grain yields between 3.5 and 6.7 t ha<sup>-1</sup>. On average, the <italic>tin</italic> lines yielded similarly to their free-tillering counterparts (4.67 vs. 4.78 t ha<sup>-1</sup>, respectively), owing to their higher grain weight (45.0 vs. 42.3 mg), which compensated for a lower grain number (10408 vs. 11554 m<sup>-</sup>&#xb2;) resulting from fewer spikes m<sup>-2</sup> (406 vs. 437), despite a similar number of grains per spike. The reduced fruiting efficiency of <italic>tin</italic> lines (56.0 vs. 65.6 grains g<sup>-1</sup> of spike), likely due to an inefficient investment in chaff, may have constrained the expression of their typically high spike fertility. However, the lower spike number plasticity in <italic>tin</italic> lines was balanced by greater plasticity in grain weight, enabling comparable grain yield plasticity between NILs. Although the grain yield level and plasticity of <italic>tin</italic> lines were comparable to those of free-tillering lines, these results do not support their adoption in cropping systems targeting moderate to high yields. On the other hand, the findings do not rule out the potential benefits of introgressing <italic>tin</italic> genes into different genetic backgrounds or improving fruiting efficiency to overcome the limitations identified in this study.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>low tillering</kwd>
<kwd>wheat</kwd>
<kwd>plasticity</kwd>
<kwd>grain weight</kwd>
<kwd>spike fertility</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="37"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="7298"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Agroecological Cropping Systems</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Breeders have been working on the tillering capacity of cereals, and an important achievement was obtained with the introgression of the <italic>tin</italic> (tiller inhibition) gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Atsmon and Jacobs, 1977</xref>) into free-tillering bread wheat lines (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.). By shifting part of the soil water availability from pre- to post-anthesis, the reduced-tillering trait of <italic>tin</italic> lines showed a small but consistent advantage in terms of yield in the most water-limited environments of Australia under current and likely future conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Houshmandfar et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>Tin</italic> lines not only produce fewer tillers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mitchell et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Sadras and Rebetzke, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hendriks et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Motzo et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>), but also generate more fertile spikes and larger, heavier grains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Richards, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Mitchell et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hendriks et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Motzo et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). However, the extent to which these traits are expressed strongly depends on the genetic background, environmental conditions, and management strategy adopted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>This near-uniculm growth habit&#x2014;characterized by a high harvest index, large spikes, high spike fertility, and heavy grains&#x2014;aligns well with the ideotype proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Donald (1968)</xref> for highly productive environments, such as those found in Italy. These range from the Mediterranean-type climates of Southern Italy and the Italian islands to the wetter areas of Northern Italy. Such environments typically receive more than 500 mm of seasonal rainfall (October&#x2013;June) and experience less severe terminal water stress compared to Australian wheat-growing regions.</p>
<p>In Italy, bread wheat is generally cultivated at sowing densities of 350&#x2013;400 viable seeds m<sup>-2</sup> and nitrogen fertilization rates of 100&#x2013;150 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>. Under these conditions, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Giunta et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref> evaluated 27 bread wheat cultivars and reported average grain yields of 6.9 t ha<sup>-1</sup> (ranging from 4.7 to 9.8 t ha<sup>-1</sup>). Yield variation was not markedly constrained by fluctuations in seasonal rainfall, which ranged from 297 to 592 mm across the four environments tested.</p>
<p>In such contexts, <italic>tin</italic> lines are expected to increase grain yield by enhancing the proportion of main stems, which are presumably more fertile and productive than tillers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), and potentially capable of producing heavier grains.</p>
<p>However, the effectiveness of adopting a <italic>tin</italic> plant type depends on meeting several key conditions. First, the advantages of higher spike fertility, grain weight, and harvest index in <italic>tin</italic> lines must also be expressed at sowing densities of 350&#x2013;400 seeds m<sup>-2</sup>. Previous studies assessing the impact of sowing density on <italic>tin</italic> lines used lower densities (approximately 150&#x2013;300 seeds m<sup>-2</sup>) and found no significant effects on yield or yield-related traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mitchell et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> reported that <italic>tin</italic> lines produced heavier grains than free-tillering lines at both 100 and 200 plants m<sup>-2</sup>.</p>
<p>Second, the inherent reduction in tiller number plasticity in <italic>tin</italic> lines must be offset by increased plasticity in spike fertility and/or grain weight. Although grain weight is generally considered the least plastic of the yield components (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Sadras and Slafer, 2012</xref>), even small increases in grain weight can contribute to yield gains&#x2014;especially when amplified by high grain number per spike in favorable seasons.</p>
<p>Third, potential trade-offs between yield components must be carefully considered.</p>
<p>The aim of this study was to compare two <italic>tin</italic> lines with their near-isogenic free-tillering counterparts under environmental conditions typical of Italian wheat-growing areas, using the sowing and fertilization practices commonly adopted by local farmers. The trials were designed to test whether: (i) the higher spike fertility and grain weight observed in <italic>tin</italic> lines relative to free-tillering lines are maintained under these conditions and result in increased grain yield; and (ii) plasticity in spike fertility and grain weight allows <italic>tin</italic> lines to adapt to environmental variability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Sites and experimental design</title>
<p>Four field trials were conducted in Ottava (SS) (40.8&#xb0;N 8.5&#xb0;E, 80 m above sea level) in Sardinia, Italy, in the 2016/17 (&#x2018;SS17&#x2019;), 2017/18 (&#x2018;SS18&#x2019;), 2020/21 (&#x2018;SS21&#x2019;) and 2022/23 (&#x2018;SS23&#x2019;) seasons, and two field trials were conducted in Fiorenzuola d&#x2019;Arda (PC) (44.9&#xb0;N, 9.9&#xb0;E, 82 m asl) in Northern Italy, in the 2016/17 (&#x2018;FI17&#x2019;) and 2017/18 (&#x2018;FI18&#x2019;) seasons.</p>
<p>The soil in Ottava consisted of a sandy clay loam of a maximum depth of about 0.6&#x2013;0.7 m overlying a limestone bedrock (Xerochrepts). The climate is typically Mediterranean, with an annual rainfall of 552 mm, mainly concentrated between October and April (with reference to the past 60 years), and a seasonal rainfall (Oct&#x2013;May) of 480 mm. The annual mean temperature is 16.3&#xb0;C, with minimum winter (Jan&#x2013;Mar) temperatures of 6.6&#xb0;C and maximum spring (Apr&#x2013;Jun) temperatures of 22.5&#xb0;C. The soil in Fiorenzuola d&#x2019;Arda is a deep silt clay loam, mesic Udic Ustochrepts, and the climate is temperate, with an annual average rainfall of 786 mm (with reference to the past 37 years) and a seasonal rainfall (Oct-May) of 574 mm. The annual mean temperature is 12.5&#xb0;C, with minimum winter (Jan&#x2013;Mar) temperatures of -1.9&#xb0;C and maximum spring (Apr&#x2013;Jun) temperatures of 23.0&#xb0;C.</p>
<p>In all the six environments, we compared two near-isogenic pairs of lines (NILs) (commercial cultivars and two backcross oligoculm selections containing the <italic>tin</italic> gene of the donor line 492) of bread wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.), namely Janz &#xb1; <italic>tin</italic> and Kite &#xb1; <italic>tin</italic>. The two NILs, kindly provided by Dr. R.A. Richards, possess the <italic>tin</italic> (tiller inhibition) gene, in linkage with the <italic>Hg</italic> (hairy glume) gene at 10 &#xb1; 3 map units (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Richards, 1988</xref>). Kite &#xb1; <italic>tin</italic> is awnless while Janz &#xb1; <italic>tin</italic> is awned.</p>
<p>Fields were prepared by chisel-ploughing to a depth of 0.25 m, followed by surface cultivation. Sowing was performed at the rate of 350 germinable seeds m<sup>-2</sup> between 31 October and 26 November in all environments except SS23, where the unfavorable rainfall pattern moved sowing to the 3 January. The preceding crop was barley at Fiorenzuola, and faba bean or Alexandrian clover at Ottava. Plots consisted of 8 rows 8.4 m long, with a between-row distance of 0.15 m, for a total area of 10 m<sup>2</sup>. Nitrogen fertilization only was applied in the field trials in Fiorenzuola, split between sowing and April, for a total of 177 kg N ha<sub>-1</sub> in 2017 and 108 kg N&#xa0;ha<sub>-1</sub> in 2018. Both N and P were applied in Ottava, with the N rate varying from 49 to 119 kg ha<sub>-1</sub>, and P from 13 to 40 kg ha<sub>-1</sub>. Weeds, pests and diseases were chemically controlled.</p>
<p>Treatments were arranged in a split-plot design with four replications. Cultivars were assigned to the main plots and the presence/absence of the <italic>tin</italic> gene to the sub-plots.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Measurements and data analysis</title>
<p>Emergence, booting (DC 39, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zadoks et&#xa0;al., 1974</xref>), anthesis (DC 61) and physiological maturity (DC 92) were recorded by periodical inspections of the plots when more than 50% of plants in the plot had reached that phenological stage.</p>
<p>Two biomass samplings were carried out at the stages of anthesis and physiological maturity. Four 0.5 m long samples of uprooted plants per plot, roots excluded, were hand-cut at each stage for a total of 0.3 m<sup>2</sup>. Anthesis and maturity samples were divided into stems plus leaves (indicated as &#x2018;stems&#x2019;) and spikes, and the number of stem and spikes ascertained and expressed on a square meter basis. All samples were oven-dried at 80&#xb0;C for 48 hours before weighing. Spikes from the maturity samples were threshed, and grain weight, number of grains spike<sup>-1</sup> and moisture content determined.</p>
<p>Nitrogen percentage was determined on each Ottava biomass subsample by means of a Carbon/Hydrogen/Nitrogen Analyzer (628 Series, LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA).</p>
<p>The number of grains m<sup>-2</sup> was calculated as the product of the number of spikes m<sup>-2</sup> and the number of grains spike<sup>-1</sup>. Grain yield was obtained on a plot basis with mechanical harvesting. Grain weight and grain yield were expressed at 0% humidity.</p>
<p>Fruiting efficiency was calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Fischer (2011)</xref> as:</p>
<p>Fruiting efficiency (number of grains set per unit of spike dry weight at anthesis) = (number of grains m<sup>-2</sup>)/(spike weight m<sup>-2</sup> at anthesis)</p>
<p>The grain filling rate was estimated by dividing grain weight by the number of days between anthesis and maturity, considered to be roughly representative of the grain filling duration. Translocation was estimated on both a single stem basis and on a unit surface basis:</p>
<p>Translocation on individual stem basis (g stem<sup>-1</sup>) = dry weight one stem at maturity &#x2013; dry weight one stem at anthesis</p>
<p>Translocation on a surface basis (g m<sup>-2</sup>) = Translocation on one stem basis x number of stems m<sup>-2</sup> at physiological maturity</p>
<p>The maximum fraction of photosynthetically active radiation intercepted (FIPAR) by the leaves was measured at booting, i.e. once all leaves had emerged and the maximum leaf interception reached. Measurements were made at noon using a portable probe (Sun-Scan Canopy Analysis System SS1-UM-1.05. Delta-T Devices Ltd., Burwell, Cambridge, UK) allowing the simultaneous measurement of photosynthetically active radiation above (using an external sensor) and below (using the probe) the canopy. The same instrument estimated the green area index (GAI). Using these data, we calculated the KPAR (extinction coefficient for photosynthetically active radiation) of each plot according to the formula:</p>
<p>KPAR = &#x2212;[LN(1-FIPAR)]/GAI</p>
<p>The daily photothermal quotient (PTQ) for the booting-anthesis period was calculated following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Fisher (1985)</xref> by dividing the daily intercepted PAR (calculated by multiplying the maximum FIPAR by half the daily total solar radiation recorded at the site) by the daily mean temperature minus 4.5&#xb0;C. We also calculated the mean PTQ value for the whole booting-anthesis period.</p>
<p>Weather data (maximum and minimum temperature, rainfall, solar radiation, wind speed and air humidity) were recorded in meteorological stations located approx. 300 m from the fields. Reference evapostranspiration (ETo) was calculated from those data according to the Penman-Monteith equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Allen et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>). Cumulative growing degree days (&#xb0;Cd) from sowing were calculated assuming a base temperature of 0 &#xb0;C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ritchie, 1991</xref>).</p>
<p>Linear regressions were used to explore the relationships between different agronomic traits, and to analyze trait plasticity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Finlay and Wilkinson, 1963</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Lin et&#xa0;al., 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Becker and Leon, 1988</xref>). Plasticity was quantified separately for <italic>tin</italic> and free-tillering lines as the slope of the regression relating the line means of the two groups to the environment means (i.e. a response is non-plastic if it is in parallel to the mean environment response, as indicated by a regression coefficient of zero). We calculated plasticity for each group of lines using the 12 &#x2018;environment x cultivar&#x2019; means. We used t-tests to calculate the probability that differences in the slopes for <italic>tin</italic> and free-tillering lines occurred by chance.</p>
<p>After assessing the homogeneity of variances by means of the Bartlett Test, we performed a combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) by superimposing the year as the main plot factor on the original design. The resulting split-split-plot design is an extension of the split-plot design, and can be adopted to accommodate a third factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gomez and Gomez, 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Quinn and Keough, 2002</xref>). Year was the whole plot factor (A), cultivar was the sub plot factor (B), and +/- <italic>tin</italic> the sub-sub plot factor (C). Error (a) (Block x A) was used to test the significance of A; error (b) (Block x B(A)) was used to test A and A x B; error (c) (Block x C x (A X B)) was used to test C, A x C, B x C and A x B x C. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">R Core Team, 2017</xref>), package &#x2018;agricolae&#x2019;, ssp.plot procedure. Following a significant F test, means were compared through the least significant difference (LSD) test, considering a probability level of 0.05, calculated using the appropriate standard errors of the mean and t values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gomez and Gomez, 1984</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Weather</title>
<p>Temperatures. From October to March, Fiorenzuola recorded lower temperatures than Ottava, with December showing the greatest difference: maximum temperatures averaged 16.8&#xb0;C at Ottava and only 6.6&#xb0;C at Fiorenzuola, and minimum temperatures averaged 8.5&#xb0;C at Ottava and -1.8&#xb0;C at Fiorenzuola (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Mean monthly minimum temperatures at Fiorenzuola dropped to around or below 0&#xb0;C between December and January in both the 17/18 and 18/19 seasons. During this early part of the growing cycle, Ottava in 22/23 experienced the warmest temperatures between October and January.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Average maximum monthly temperatures <bold>(A)</bold>, average minimum monthly temperatures <bold>(B)</bold>, mean monthly evapotranspiration <bold>(C)</bold>, and mean monthly rainfall <bold>(D)</bold> during the studied growing seasons. (FI17, orange empty triangles; FI18, orange full triangles; SS17, blue empty circles; SS18; blue full circles; SS21 blue empty triangles; SS23 blue full triangles).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fagro-07-1636711-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four graphs depict climate data from October to June for different years. The top left graph shows mean maximum temperatures, which vary between 10&#xb0;C and 35&#xb0;C. The top right displays mean minimum temperatures ranging from -5&#xb0;C to 25&#xb0;C. The bottom left graph indicates evapotranspiration values from 0 to 6 millimeters. The bottom right chart presents rainfall in millimeters, with values extending up to 220 millimeters. Each graph compares data represented by different colored lines and bars, indicating variations across multiple years.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>In contrast, during the final three months of the growing cycle, both sites experienced similarly increasing temperatures. SS23 was the coolest environment during this period, particularly in terms of maximum temperatures, averaging 18.2&#xb0;C compared with 24.4&#xb0;C in the other environments. In April and May, the grain filling phase, maximum temperatures ranged from 18.7&#xb0;C in SS23 to 22.6&#xb0;C in FI17.</p>
<p>Evapotranspiration. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) was also lower at Fiorenzuola than at Ottava during the October&#x2013;March period, with values ranging from 0.3 to 1.9 mm d<sup>-1</sup> at Fiorenzuola and 1.2 to 2.7 mm d<sup>-1</sup> at Ottava. At Ottava, SS17 showed the highest ETo throughout the season, peaking at 6.5 mm d<sup>-1</sup> in June, while SS23 recorded the lowest values, with 3.7 mm d<sup>-1</sup> in May and 5.4 mm d<sup>-1</sup> in June.</p>
<p>Rainfall. SS18 recorded the highest total seasonal rainfall (784 mm from October to June), partly due to an exceptional 200 mm in May. SS23, the second-wettest environment (649 mm), received most rainfall during winter, with 200 mm in December, 180 mm in January, and 150 mm in February. The driest season was 2017, with totals of 311 mm at Ottava and 329 mm at Fiorenzuola, although spring rainfall was higher at Fiorenzuola (117 mm from March to May) than at Ottava (25 mm). Total rainfall in FI18 was 518 mm, including a notable 136 mm in May.</p>
<p>The overall performance of <italic>tin</italic> and free-tillering lines across these environmental conditions was assessed at both anthesis and maturity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Anthesis</title>
<p>Depending on the environment and sowing date, anthesis occurred between 9 April (SS18) and 16 May (FI18). In terms of cumulative growing degree days from sowing, anthesis ranged from 1318&#xb0;Cd (FI18) to 1718&#xb0;Cd (SS21). All lines flowered at approximately the same time, indicating that the <italic>tin</italic> gene did not affect developmental rate. Compared with the Italian commercial cultivar Bologna, grown in an adjacent field and sown on the same day in 2017 and 2018 at both SS and FI, the Australian lines flowered 8 days earlier at FI and 17 days earlier at SS. Cultivar Bologna can be considered representative of the leading Italian bread wheat cultivars, as it ranked among the top five Italian cultivars in 2018 based on certified seed production (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.crea.gov.it/web/difesa-e-certificazione/-/statistiche">https://www.crea.gov.it/web/difesa-e-certificazione/-/statistiche</ext-link>).</p>
<p>A wide variation in total biomass at anthesis (558&#x2013;1174 g m<sup>-2</sup>) and related traits was observed across environments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The presence of the <italic>tin</italic> gene led to greater biomass, heavier stems, and higher spike dry weight per unit area, without affecting the proportion of fertile stems (about 0.90, regardless of <italic>tin</italic> presence) or the spike-to-total dry weight ratio (about 0.20). Cultivar Kite exhibited lower spike dry weight than Janz, both in absolute terms and relative to total dry weight.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Anthesis sampling: treatment means of the measured traits and results of the ANOVA.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Source of variation</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Total biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Spike biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Weight 1 &#x2018;stem&#x2019;</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Spike weight/total weight</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Fertile stem number/Total stem number</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(g m<sup>-2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(g m<sup>-2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(g)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Environment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FI17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">906 bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">217 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.45 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.85 d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FI18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">560 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">137 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.65 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.94 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1174 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">242 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.55 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.88 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">993 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">245 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.46 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.91 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">827 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">163 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.63 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.95 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">558 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">129 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.81 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.95 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Cultivar</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">*</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Kite</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">829</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">169 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.18 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.91 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Janz</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">851</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">210 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.38</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.23 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.93 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">TIN</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ns</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ns</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">808 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">181 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.25 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">873 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">199 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.58 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.92</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>TIN</italic> x ENV</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>TIN</italic> x CULT</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">ENV x CULT</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ns</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>TIN</italic> x ENV xCULT</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ns</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>ns, not significant at the ANOVA F-test; *significant for P &#x2264; 0.05; **significant for P &#x2264; 0.01; ***significant for P &#x2264; 0.001.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Means with the same letter are not significantly different at the LSD-test for P &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Any effect of reduced tillering or cultivar on radiation interception by anthesis was ruled out based on data for the fraction of intercepted PAR (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S1</bold>
</xref>), which ranged from a minimum of 0.55 at SS23&#x2014;where late sowing limited GAI to 1.42&#x2014;to a maximum of 0.96 at SS18, where GAI reached 6.31, but were not different between NILs (0.82 and 0.81 on average, se= 0.01). This fraction of intercepted radiation was used to calculate the mean daily photothermal quotient (PTQ) for the period between booting and anthesis. We observed a wide variation in mean PTQ across environments, ranging from 0.6 MJ&#xb0;C<sup>-1</sup> in SS23 (late sowing) to 1.4 MJ&#xb0;C<sup>-1</sup> in FI17, along with inconsistent and difficult-to-interpret differences between <italic>tin</italic> and free-tillering lines. As a result, NILs did not differ significantly in mean PTQ values.</p>
<p>Data on nitrogen uptake at anthesis and its partitioning between the spike and vegetative tissues (&#x201c;stems&#x201d;) were available only for the four Ottava environments. These data showed no significant effect of the <italic>tin</italic> gene on N uptake or partitioning (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S2</bold>
</xref>), despite large variation in these traits across environments. Cultivar Janz exhibited greater N uptake than Kite.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Maturity: grain yield and yield components</title>
<p>The presence of the <italic>tin</italic> gene had no effect on grain yield, and no interaction was detected between the <italic>tin</italic> gene and either the environment or parental cultivar for this trait (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Grain yield ranged from 3.5 &#xb1; 0.22 t ha<sup>-1</sup> at SS23, likely due to late sowing, to 6.7 &#xb1; 0.22 t ha<sup>-1</sup> at FI17. Yields were comparable to that of the Italian commercial cultivar Bologna, which produced 5.2 &#xb1; 0.7 t ha<sup>-1</sup> when grown in adjacent fields and sown on the same day in 2017 and 2018 at both sites.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Yield and yield components.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" colspan="2" align="center">Source of variation</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Grain yield</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Grain weight</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">GNO</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Grains spike<sup>-1</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Spikes m<sup>-2</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Grain filling rate</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Fruiting efficiency</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(t ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(mg)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(no m<sup>-2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(no)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(no)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(mg &#xb0;Cd<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(no grains g<sup>-1</sup> of spike)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>Environment</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">FI17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.73 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50.3 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13431 ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.3 ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">500 ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.20 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63.3 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">FI18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.05 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49.0 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8335 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.5 bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">332 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.19 cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">62.3 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">SS17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.99 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.4 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12110 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.9 cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">542 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.29 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">53.7 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">SS18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.46 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.5 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13751 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.1 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">463 bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14 e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57.0 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">SS21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.60 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.7 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9449 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.8 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">320 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.27 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">58.1 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">SS23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.54 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.1 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8884 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.7 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">452 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.19 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">71.1 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>Cultivar</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Kite</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.82</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.6 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10741</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">420 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.22 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">65.1 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Janz</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.64</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.8 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11235</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">454 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.21 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56.9 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>TIN</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.78</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.3 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11554 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">467 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.21 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">65.6 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.67</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.0 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10408 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">406 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.22 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56.0 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>TIN x ENV</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FI17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">48.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13097</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">519</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.80</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12982</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">478</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FI18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">46.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8918</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">325</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">68.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7885</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">346</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">55.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13151</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">624</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">62.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.88</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11068</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">461</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.50</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14228</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">508</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.43</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13275</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">419</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">53.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.80</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10408</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">337</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.40</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8490</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">303</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.70</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9332</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">482</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">75.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.38</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8436</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">422</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">66.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>LSD<sub>0.05</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>0.04</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>1.5</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>1110</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>3.3</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>40</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>0.01</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>8.6</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>TIN x CULT</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>ENV x CULT</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>TIN x ENV x CULT</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Treatment means of the measured traits and results of the ANOVA.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>ns, not significant at the ANOVA F-test; *significant for P &#x2264; 0.05; **significant for P &#x2264; 0.01; ***significant for P &#x2264; 0.001;</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Means with the same letter are not significantly different at the LSD-test for P &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>LSD<sub>0.05</sub>, Least Significant Difference for the comparison of <italic>tin</italic> and free-tillering lines within the same environment at P &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<sec id="s3_3_1">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Grain number</title>
<p>Grain yield was more strongly associated with grain number per unit area (GNO; r = 0.83, P &#x2264; 0.001, n = 24) than with grain weight (r = 0.42, P &#x2264; 0.04). In turn, GNO correlated more closely with spikes m<sup>-2</sup> (r = 0.64, P &#x2264; 0.001) than with grains spike<sup>-1</sup> (r = 0.41, P &#x2264; 0.04). However, no differences in these relationships were observed between <italic>tin</italic> and free-tillering lines.</p>
<p>The lower mean GNO in <italic>tin</italic> lines (11235 &#xb1; 182) compared to free-tillering ones (10741 &#xb1; 182) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>) was attributed to the reduced number of spikes m<sup>-2</sup> in <italic>tin</italic> lines (406 &#xb1; 7 vs 467 &#xb1; 7) across all environments except FI18 and SS21, which had the lowest spike densities. Spike fertility was higher in <italic>tin</italic> lines in only two out of six environments, and the average difference in spike fertility between NIL groups was not significant. Cultivar Kite exhibited fewer spikes m<sup>-2</sup> than Janz.</p>
<p>The presence of the <italic>tin</italic> gene was also associated with lower fruiting efficiency (56.0 &#xb1; 1.4 vs 65.6 &#xb1; 1.4 grains g<sup>-1</sup> of spike weight at anthesis), with no significant interaction with environment.</p>
<p>To assess the effect of environmental conditions around anthesis on GNO, values were regressed against the PTQ between booting and anthesis. Two distinct relationships emerged for <italic>tin</italic> and free-tillering lines (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), but comparison of intercepts and slopes revealed no significant differences.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>The relationship between mean photothermal quotient (PTQ, MJ&#xb0;C<sup>-1</sup>) between DC39 and DC61 and the grain number (GNO, grains m<sup>-2</sup>). Data are tin x cultivar x environment means. Blu circles= free-tillering; Orange triangles= tin.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fagro-07-1636711-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plot displaying the relationship between mean PTQ booting-anthesis and GNO. Blue dots and orange triangles represent respectively free-tillering and tin lines: blue (y = 7100.3x + 4809, R&#xb2; = 0.51) and orange (y = 6534.7x + 3956.2, R&#xb2; = 0.67).</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_2">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Grain weight</title>
<p>The <italic>tin</italic> gene had a positive effect on grain weight, with <italic>tin</italic> lines averaging 1.8 mg more than free-tillering lines. This difference resulted from a significant <italic>tin</italic> &#xd7; environment interaction, driven by large differences of 5.7 mg at SS17 and 5.9 mg at FI18. Notably, in the driest environment (SS17), grain weight was more negatively affected in free-tillering lines than in <italic>tin</italic> lines.</p>
<p>Grain weight variation was significantly associated with the rate of grain filling in both NIL groups. A higher rate was observed in <italic>tin</italic> lines (0.22 &#xb1; 0.001 mg &#xb0;Cd<sup>-1</sup>) compared to free-tillering ones (0.21 &#xb1; 0.001 mg &#xb0;Cd<sup>-1</sup>), with the largest differences between NILs being 0.05 and 0.03 mg &#xb0;Cd<sup>-1</sup> at SS17 and FI18, respectively.</p>
<p>The greater grain weight of <italic>tin</italic> lines was also linked to their greater capacity to translocate assimilates to developing grains between anthesis and maturity. This was evident both on a single stem basis (0.4 &#xb1; 0.02 g stem<sup>-1</sup> vs 0.2 &#xb1; 0.02 g stem<sup>-1</sup>) and per unit area (25 &#xb1; 1.4 g m<sup>-2</sup> vs 13 &#xb1; 1.4 g m<sup>-2</sup>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). For <italic>tin</italic> lines, translocation represented 25% of stem dry matter at anthesis when expressed per unit surface, and 16% on a per-stem basis.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Translocation to the growing grains, roughly estimated as the decrease in stem dry matter (DM) between anthesis and maturity (data from FI18 are missing).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" colspan="2" align="center">Source of variation</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">DM decrease anthesis-maturity</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(g m<sup>-2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(g stem<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>Environment</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">FI17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">127 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">SS17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">222 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.38 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">SS18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">122 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">SS21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">146 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">SS23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">54 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>Cultivar</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Kite</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">107 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.24 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Janz</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">162 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.35 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>TIN</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">107 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.20 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">162 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.38 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>TIN x ENV</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FI17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">125</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">128</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">180</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">263</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">186</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">104</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">188</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free-tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<bold>
<italic>LSD<sub>0.05</sub>
</italic>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>
<italic>48</italic>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>
<italic>0.1</italic>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>TIN x CULT</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>ENV x CULT</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">
<italic>TIN x ENV x CULT</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>***</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Means and ANOVA results.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>ns, not significant at the ANOVA F-test; *significant for P &#x2264; 0.05; **significant for P &#x2264; 0.01; ***significant for P &#x2264; 0.001.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Means with the same letter are not significantly different at the LSD-test for P &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>LSD<sub>0.05</sub>, Least Significant Difference for the comparison of <italic>tin</italic> and <italic>non-tin</italic> lines within the same environment at P &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The extent of translocation varied with environment, reaching a maximum in SS18, but it was not associated with post-anthesis water stress, as the most stressful grain filling conditions occurred in SS17, not SS18.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_3">
<label>3.3.3</label>
<title>Nitrogen</title>
<p>Nitrogen data were available only for the four Ottava environments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Grain protein content ranged from 9.9 &#xb1; 0.1% in SS21 to 16.1 &#xb1; 0.1% in SS18. Among these environments, SS18 consistently showed the highest total N uptake and N content in all plant organs, and, in terms of cultivars, Kite absorbed more nitrogen than Janz.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Nitrogen (N) uptake and partitioning at harvest.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Source of variation</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Grain protein</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Grain N</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Stem N</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Chaff N</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">N in grains</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">N in stems</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Total N</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(mg&#xa0;grain<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(g m<sup>-2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(g m<sup>-2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(g m<sup>-2</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Environment</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">*</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ns</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.7 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.78 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.4 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.8 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.1 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.14 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.03 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.91</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.4 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.5 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.5 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.9 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.71 d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.73 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.91</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.3 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.5 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.7 d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SS23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.2 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.93 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.88 ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.1 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.0 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.3 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Cultivar</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">***</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ns</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">*</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">**</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Kite</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.1 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.97 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.86</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.09 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.4 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.7 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.4 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Janz</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.8 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.81 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.88 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.2b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.7 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.7 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>TIN</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Free tillering</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.88</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.90</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.96</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.1 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.90</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.81</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.5 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">TIN x ENV</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">TIN x CULT</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">ENV x CULT</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>**</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">TIN x ENV x CULT</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>ns</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>*</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Means and ANOVA results. Fiorenzuola environments were not available.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>ns, not significant at the ANOVA F-test;</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>*significant for P &#x2264; 0.05;</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>**significant for P &#x2264; 0.01.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Means with the same letter are not significantly different at the LSD-test for P &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>As observed at anthesis, the <italic>tin</italic> gene did not affect nitrogen-related traits, with the only exception being grain N per unit area (g m<sup>-2</sup>), likely due to the higher GNO in free-tillering lines.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Plasticity</title>
<p>Plasticity in yield and related traits was assessed by calculating the slope of the regression between trait values and a gradient of environmental conditions ranging from &#x2018;unfavorable&#x2019; to &#x2018;favorable&#x2019;, separately for the two groups of NILs. According to the determination coefficients R<sup>2</sup>, the environmental indexes explained from 76 to 96% of the trait variation. The plasticity of spikes m<sup>-2</sup> was significantly greater in free-tillering lines, indicating that this trait was less responsive (i.e., less plastic) in <italic>tin</italic>-containing genotypes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). Conversely, <italic>tin</italic> lines exhibited greater plasticity for grain weight.</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Plasticity of <italic>tin</italic> and <italic>free-tillering</italic> lines for the main measured traits, quantified as the slope of the regression between line means and environment means.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Source of variation</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Free-tillering</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>Tin</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Probability T-test</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="1" align="center">Plasticity (b &#xb1; s.e.)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">R<sup>2</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="1" align="center">Plasticity (b &#xb1; s.e.)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">R<sup>2</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>tin vs</italic> free-tillering</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Grain yield (t ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.95 &#xb1; <italic>0.07</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.05 &#xb1; <italic>0.07</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.96</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.389</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Grain weight (mg)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.83 &#xb1; <italic>0.09</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.90</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.17 &#xb1; <italic>0.09</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.94</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Grain number m<sup>-2</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.07 &#xb1; <italic>0.10</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.92</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.93 &#xb1; <italic>0.1</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.376</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Number of grains spike<sup>-1</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00 &#xb1; <italic>0.18</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00 &#xb1; <italic>0.18</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.978</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Number of spikes m<sup>-2</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.25 &#xb1; <italic>0.10</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.94</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.75 &#xb1; <italic>0.1</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Fruiting efficiency</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.01 &#xb1; <italic>0.12</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.87</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.99 &#xb1; <italic>0.12</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.87</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.899</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Spike DM at anthesis (g m<sup>-2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.87 &#xb1; <italic>0.08</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.91</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.13 &#xb1; <italic>0.08</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.055</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>No other traits showed significant differences in plasticity due to the presence of the <italic>tin</italic> gene, although the difference in spike dry matter at anthesis approached significance (P &#x2264; 0.055).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The target environment of this experiment is not as water-limited as the Australian-type environments for which <italic>tin</italic> lines were proposed as a way of coping with severe terminal water stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Houshmandfar et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), as demonstrated by its high potential yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Fischer, 2015</xref>), estimated in about 10 t ha<sup>-1</sup>on a plot basis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Giunta et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The sowing rate commonly adopted for wheat in these situations is 350&#x2013;400 seeds m<sup>-2</sup>, much higher than the 100&#x2013;150 seeds m<sup>-2</sup> typical of the Australian cropping systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kirkegaard and Hunt, 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>Under these conditions, reduced-tillering lines may be used, not to save water early in the season, but to increase the proportion of main stems and hence mean spike fertility, grain weight and, ultimately, grain yield, consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Donald&#x2019;s (1968)</xref> ideotype for high yields in favorable environments. Although <italic>tin</italic> lines generally performed less well than their free-tillering counterparts in the more favorable situations of Australia (with grain yields exceeding 2 t ha<sup>-1</sup>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke, 2017</xref>), the difference in sowing rate might be expected to have an impact on the relative performance of <italic>tin</italic> vs free-tillering lines, as shown by the <italic>tin</italic> x sowing rate interaction for yield described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al. (2005)</xref>, with <italic>tin</italic> lines yielding more than the freely tillering lines at the higher but not at the lower sowing rates.</p>
<p>To investigate this possibility, we studied the effects of the tiller-inhibition gene in wheat grown in six different field environments, characterized by large differences in seasonal (Oct-May) rainfall, varying from 311 to 784 mm, and a wide range of grain yield (3.5&#x2013;6.7 t ha<sup>-1</sup>), considering two genetic backgrounds (Kite and Janz), which differ in most of the traits recorded at anthesis and in their yield components, but which are similar in terms of overall grain yield and flowering time. It is noteworthy that, despite the wide range of environmental conditions, no environment-by-line interaction was detected for grain yield. This result can be attributed to the similar and early anthesis dates of the NIL lines, which makes these findings applicable to a wide range of environments. Based on the available data for cultivar Bologna, which is representative of the best Italian bread wheat cultivars, the productivity of the Australian cultivars evaluated in this experiment falls within the range of Italian commercial cultivars.</p>
<p>The lower mean number of spikes m<sup>-2</sup> recorded for the <italic>tin</italic> lines compared with their free-tillering counterparts was not an obvious result, considering the negative relationship between tiller number and plant population density (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Darwinkel, 1978</xref>). On average, <italic>tin</italic> lines produced 13% fewer spikes m<sup>-2</sup> than their free-tillering counterparts, lying in-between the 11% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>) and 16% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke, 2017</xref>) quoted in the literature with respect to lower sowing densities. The sowing rate adopted here did not prevent <italic>tin</italic> lines from producing a certain number of fertile tillers, which was nonetheless smaller than in the free-tillering lines and insufficient to guarantee a value of plasticity in spikes m<sup>-2</sup> comparable to that expressed by free-tillering lines. This lower number and degree of plasticity in spikes m<sup>-2</sup> is an obvious and proven consequence of the reduced-tillering habit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite the reduction in spikes m<sup>-2</sup>, <italic>tin</italic> lines assured a grain yield and a level of plasticity in grain yield comparable to the free-tillering lines in all the environmental conditions and genetic backgrounds. This result contrasts with what was observed in the Australian context and suggests a difference in how <italic>tin</italic> altered the balances and trade-offs, i.e. the compensation, between GNO and grain weight.</p>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>The effect of <italic>tin</italic> gene on the grain number</title>
<p>GNO was the main determinant of grain yield, and the generally lower GNOs produced by <italic>tin</italic> lines derived from the inability of their spike fertility to compensate for the lower number of spikes m<sup>-2</sup>. But in contrast with previous studies reporting a variable but significantly greater grain number spike<sup>-1</sup> in <italic>tin</italic> vs free-tillering lines at lower plant population densities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Mitchell et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), we observed no difference in the average grain number spike<sup>-1</sup>, signalling that the sowing rate adopted did not allow the full expression of the &#x2018;<italic>gigas</italic>&#x2019; phenotype, i.e. limited tillering plus large and proliferous spikes and robust and vigorous vegetative parts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Atsmon and Jacobs, 1977</xref>). Duncan et&#xa0;al. (2005) similarly observed a decrease in <italic>tin</italic> spike fertility at higher sowing densities.</p>
<p>Analyzing GNO through the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Fischer&#x2019;s (2011)</xref> approach (GNO = spike weight m<sup>-2</sup> at anthesis x number of grains g of spike<sup>-1</sup> or &#x2018;fruiting efficiency&#x2019;) revealed that <italic>tin</italic> lines were able to build a greater biomass by anthesis thanks to their heavier stems, more than compensating for their lower number of spikes m<sup>-2</sup>, and to translate this greater biomass into a greater spike weight at anthesis. The reduced tillering did not compromise their ability to intercept radiation in the critical period for grain number determination (here, roughly considered to coincide with the booting to anthesis period). In fact, although <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Moeller et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> observed both a lower leaf area index and lower radiation interception in <italic>tin</italic> lines compared with free-tillering lines, the relationship between tillering, leaf area index and radiation interception is not straightforward (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Sadras and Rebetzke, 2013</xref>). Therefore, what limited the production of higher grain numbers in <italic>tin</italic> lines was their lower fruiting efficiency, which prevented any advantage being gained from the greater biomass and spike weight at anthesis. As already observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gaju et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Motzo et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>), the increase in chaff weight induced by the <italic>tin</italic> gene is disproportionately greater than the increase in grains spike<sup>-1</sup>, resulting in lower fruiting efficiencies. The earlier cessation of bud outgrowth associated with the <italic>tin</italic> gene during the transition of the shoot apex from the vegetative to the reproductive stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kebrom et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) likely favored the allocation of the diverted assimilates to organs that were growing in that period, while also lengthening the duration of their growth. Rachis and glumes start growing before the florets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">McMaster et&#xa0;al., 1992</xref>); hence, this earlier availability of resources may have resulted in a greater growth and weight of the spike&#x2019;s structural tissues and, in turn, a heavier chaff weight, but not necessarily in more fertile florets. A possible avenue to overcome this limitation could be an increase in the number of competent florets per spike weight, and/or in the proportion of competent florets that progress through pollination, fertilization and early grain survival to bear grains at maturity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Fischer, 2011</xref>). The association between floral abortion and the 7Ag.7DL translocation in wheat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Reynolds et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>) could be useful in breeding for a higher fruiting efficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>The effect of <italic>tin</italic> gene on the grain weight and protein percentage</title>
<p>The greater grain weight of <italic>tin</italic> lines was the yield component accounting for both the similar grain yields of <italic>tin</italic> and free-tillering lines, despite the lower number of grains m<sup>-2</sup> in the former, and the lack of any decrease in grain yield plasticity in <italic>tin</italic> compared with free-tillering lines.</p>
<p>The mean grain weight recorded here for <italic>tin</italic> lines (45 mg) was significantly higher than the values reported for most of the Australian environments at lower plant population densities, despite the negative effect of an increase in plant population density on the grain weight in <italic>tin</italic> lines observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mitchell et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke (2017)</xref> quoted a mean grain weight of 38 mg for <italic>tin</italic> lines grown across different water stress environments, whereas the higher grain weight recorded by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mitchell et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref>, for their higher plant density treatment (about 200 plants m<sup>-2</sup>) cultivated under irrigation, was 31 mg.</p>
<p>The greater anthesis biomass, translocation and grain filling rate associated with the higher grain weight of <italic>tin</italic> lines was in line with previous observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mitchell et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Higher rates of grain filling and greater translocation are both important for environments with terminal water stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mitchell et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Asseng et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). That is why the SS17 environment, characterized by the most severe water stress, was the one in which the greatest difference between the two NIL groups was observed. On the other hand, the lack of any increase in spike fertility meant that the potentially higher amount of water-soluble carbohydrates present in the denser stems by anthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Motzo et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dreccer et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>) were shared between a lower number of grains per spike, allowing them to grow at a higher rate, resulting in higher final grain weights also in the more favorable environments with abundant spring rainfall (FI18, SS18).</p>
<p>Therefore, we can at least partly attribute the higher plasticity in grain weight observed in the <italic>tin</italic> lines to the exploitation of greater quantities of assimilates and resources per spike in the more favorable environments, which compensated for their lower plasticity in spikes m<sup>-2</sup>, as shown by the similar levels of grain yield plasticity in <italic>tin</italic> and free tillering lines, in contrast with what was observed under Australian agricultural systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Moeller and Rebetzke, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Grain protein percentage is the most important component of wheat grain quality, and low protein grains are better suited for feed and not for human consumption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Shewry, 2009</xref>). The range in grain protein percentage recorded in the four environments for which nitrogen traits were available lay within those reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al. (2005)</xref>. Interestingly, the increase in grain weight did not cause a &#x2018;dilution effect&#x2019; on grain protein content, and by consequence did not result in a decrease in grain protein percentage, confirming the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Duggan et&#xa0;al. (2005)</xref>. GNO is generally considered the sink for grain nitrogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Martre et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). In this sense, the lower GNO of <italic>tin</italic> lines meant that the similar amounts of nitrogen taken up by anthesis by <italic>tin</italic> and free-tillering lines were shared by a lower, although heavier, number of grains at maturity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The expected advantages arising from a greater proportion of main stems in <italic>tin</italic> lines were only partly achieved, as the unfruitful investment in chaff weight prevented the expression of their characteristic higher spike fertility at the sowing densities analyzed. The limited plasticity in the number of spikes m<sup>-2</sup>, together with the reduced fruiting efficiency, compromised the yield potential under favorable environmental conditions. On the other hand, we must be careful not to rule out the possibility that the notable increase in grain weight and grain weight plasticity was, at least partly, a consequence of the lack of any increase in spike fertility. This is why the grain yield level and grain yield plasticity of <italic>tin</italic> lines, although comparable to free-tillering ones, do not justify their use for increasing wheat productivity in the target bread wheat cropping systems in Italy. On the other hand, the observed cultivar effect does not allow us to exclude the possibility that the limits highlighted here cannot be overcome by the introgression of the <italic>tin</italic> genes in other genetic backgrounds, or by genetic improvement of fruiting efficiency.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>FM: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Data curation, Investigation. RM: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. F-WB: Investigation, Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Data curation. FR: Data curation, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. FG: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The research was funded by the FAR (Fondo di Ateneo per la Ricerca 2020) of the University of Sassari.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>This research represents part of a PhD project carried out by Francesca Mureddu at the Doctoral School in Agriculture Sciences, curriculum Crop Productivity, at the University of Sassari. We are extremely grateful to Dr. Richard Richards for having given us the possibility to study low-tillering wheats by providing us with the seeds of the lines used in this experiment. We also thank the technicians Benedetta Scalas and Mario Deroma of the Dept. of Agricultural Sciences of the University of Sassari for their assistance in field management and laboratory analysis.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fagro.2025.1636711/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fagro.2025.1636711/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raes</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop equirements</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>FAO irrigation and drainage paper no. 56</source> (<publisher-name>FAO</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Rome, Italy</publisher-loc>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Asseng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martre</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maiorano</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>R&#xf6;tter</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Leary</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fitzgerald</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <page-range>155&#x2013;173</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.14481</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30549200</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Atsmon</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1977</year>). <article-title>A newly bred &#x2018;Gigas&#x2019; Form of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): morphological features and thermo-photoperiodic responses&#x2020;</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700010010x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Stability analysis in plant breeding</article-title>. <source>Plant Breed.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Darwinkel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Patterns of tillering and grain production of winter wheat at a wide range of plant densities</article-title>. <source>Netherlands J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>383</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>398</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18174/njas.v26i4.17081</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Donald</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1968</year>). <article-title>The breeding of crop ideotypes</article-title>. <source>Euphytica</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>385</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>403</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00056241</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dreccer</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chapman</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rattey</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neal</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christopher</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Developmental and growth controls of tillering and water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in contrasting wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) genotypes: Can we dissect them</article-title>? <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>160</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ers317</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23213136</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duggan</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Herwaarden</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fettell</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Agronomic evaluation of a tiller inhibition gene (tin) in wheat. I. Effect on yield, yield components, and grain protein</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/AR04152</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Finlay</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilkinson</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1963</year>). <article-title>The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme</article-title>. <source>Crop Pasture Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>742</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>754</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/AR9630742</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Number of grains in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>461</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859600056495</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Wheat physiology: A review of recent developments</article-title>. <source>Crop Pasture Sci.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/CP10344</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Definitions and determination of crop yield, yield gaps, and of rates of change</article-title>. <source>F. Crop Res.</source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.006</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gaju</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reynolds</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sparkes</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Foulkes</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Relationships between large-spike phenotype, grain number, and yield potential in spring wheat</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>961</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>973</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2008.05.0285</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Giunta</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pruneddu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuddas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Motzo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Bread and durum wheat: Intra- and inter-specific variation in grain yield and protein concentration of modern Italian cultivars</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>128</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2019.02.011</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <source>Statistical procedures for agricultural research 2nd Edn</source> (<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wiley &amp; Sons</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hendriks</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirkegaard</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lilley</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gregory</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rebetzke</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A tillering inhibition gene influences root-shoot carbon partitioning and pattern of water use to improve wheat productivity in rainfed environments</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>340</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erv457</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26494729</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Houshmandfar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ota</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Leary</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tausz-Posch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A reduced-tillering trait shows small but important yield gains in dryland</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol</source>. <volume>26</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <page-range>4056&#x2013;4067</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.15105</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32237246</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kebrom</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chandler</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Swain</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>King</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spielmeyer</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Inhibition of tiller bud outgrowth in the tin mutant of wheat is associated with precocious internode development</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>160</volume>, <fpage>308</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>318</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.112.197954</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22791303</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kirkegaard</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunt</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Increasing productivity by matching farming system management and genotype in water-limited environments</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>4129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4143</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erq245</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20709725</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Binns</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lefkovitch</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Stability analysis: where do we stand</article-title>? <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>894</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>900</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1986</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Spike formation and seed setting of the main stem and tillers under post-jointing drought in winter wheat</article-title>. <source>J.&#xa0;Agron. Crop Sci.</source> <volume>206</volume>, <fpage>694</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>710</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jac.12432</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Martre</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jamieson</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Semenov</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zyskowski</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porter</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Triboi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Modelling protein content and composition in relation to crop nitrogen dynamics for wheat</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>138</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2006.04.007</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McMaster</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Simulating winter wheat shoot apex phenology Simulating winter wheat shoot apex phenology</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>1,</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859600071483</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chapman</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rebetzke</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonnett</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fukai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of a reduced-tillering (tin) gene in wheat lines grown across different production environments</article-title>. <source>Crop Pasture Sci.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>128</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>141</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/CP11260</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rebetzke</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chapman</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fukai</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of reduced-tillering (tin) wheat lines in managed, terminal water deficit environments</article-title>. <source>J.&#xa0;Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>3439</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3451</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ert181</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23873998</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moeller</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evers</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rebetzke</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Canopy architectural and physiological characterization of near-isogenic wheat lines differing in the tiller inhibition gene tin</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>5</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2014.00617</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25520724</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moeller</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rebetzke</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Performance of spring wheat lines near-isogenic for the reduced-tillering &#x2018;tin&#x2019; trait across a wide range of water-stress environment-types</article-title>. <source>F. Crop Res.</source> <volume>200</volume>, <fpage>98</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>113</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2016.10.010</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Motzo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giunta</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deidda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Expression of a tiller inhibitor gene in the progenies of interspecific crosses Triticum aestivum L</article-title>. <source>x T. turgidum subsp. durum. F. Crop Res.</source> <volume>85</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <page-range>15&#x2013;20</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00123-0</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Quinn</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keough</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <source>Experimental design and data analysis for biologists</source> (<publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cambridge University press</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>R Core Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source>R: a language and environment for statistical computing</source> (<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austri</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org/">https://www.R-project.org/</uri> (Accessed <access-date>May 5, 2024</access-date>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reynolds</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pellegrineschi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skovmand</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Sink-limitation to yield and biomass: a summary of some investigations in spring wheat</article-title>. <source>Ann. Appl. Biol.</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.03100.x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>A tiller inhibitor gene in wheat and its effect on plant growth</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Agric. Res</source>. <volume>39</volume>, <page-range>749&#x2013;757</page-range>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ritchie</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Wheat phasic development</article-title>. <source>Modeling Plant Soil Syst.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronmonogr31.c3</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sadras</surname> <given-names>V. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rebetzke</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Plasticity of wheat grain yield is associated with plasticity of ear number</article-title>. <source>Crop Pasture Sci.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>234</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>243</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/CP13117</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sadras</surname> <given-names>V. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slafer</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Environmental modulation of yield components in cereals: Heritabilities reveal a hierarchy of phenotypic plasticities</article-title>. <source>F. Crop Res.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>224</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.014</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shewry</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Wheat</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot</source>. <volume>60</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <page-range>1537&#x2013;1553</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erp058</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19386614</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zadoks</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Konzak</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals</article-title>. <source>Weed Res.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>415</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>421</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>