Numerous agricultural systems have witnessed heightened crop productivity through the use of synthetic fertilizers, which effectively lowers costs and maximizes yields. However, environmentalists’ express concerns that without action to mitigate fertilizer use, we risk creating an unsustainable situation in the long term, leading to an increased agricultural carbon footprint and elevated environmental compliance costs. These concerns have prompted a global shift towards more sustainable crop production approaches (Dhankher and Foyer, 2018; Pareek et al., 2020). In recent decades, bioactive natural products have been viewed as a positive approach, with the utilization of these eco-friendly compounds/materials in agriculture showing promise due to their low cost and potential for enhancing crop yield and quality. Biofertilizers, composed of active microbes, have emerged as cost-effective and eco-friendly alternatives to chemical-based fertilizers, being widely distributed in soil and capable of inducing specific desirable plant functions (Hug et al., 2020; Naamala and Smith, 2020).

Beneficial microbes, particularly Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR), play essential roles in supporting plant growth, enhancing nutrient uptake, regulating phytohormone levels, and helping plants tolerate abiotic environmental stresses such as salinity, drought, and temperature fluctuations (Rai et al., 2020; Chauhan et al., 2021; Riaz et al., 2021; Khoshru et al., 2020; Parameswaran et al., 2021). However, the performance of live microbial biofertilizers in the field is often inconsistent due to variable environmental conditions (Rilling et al., 2019) and competition from other microbes already at the site of application.

Beneficial microbes, particularly Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) constitute sustainable crop production inputs able, among other things to help mitigate the effects of climate change related stresses and to enhance uptake of atmospheric CO₂ by plants (Khoshru et al., 2020; Rai et al., 2020; Chauhan et al., 2021; Parameswaran et al., 2021; Riaz et al., 2021). However, there is a need to make their effects as consistent and as large as possible (Rilling et al., 2019). Microbial biostimulants, especially PGPR cell-free supernatants (CFSs) and isolated metabolites from the CFSs, have recently gained attention as tools to help plants withstand abiotic and biotic stresses. Specifically, these substances offer novel opportunities to promote tolerance to adverse environmental conditions during critical crop growth stages (Pellegrini et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021).

Soil salinization is a prominent abiotic stress that hampers plant functions and disrupts crop growth and yield on a global scale. Salinity reduces the plant’s water absorption capacity, creating drought-like conditions and impeding growth through osmotic stress. In addition, saline stress often leads to ion toxicity due to imbalances in cytosolic nutrients, mainly excess sodium (Na⁺) and chloride (Cl⁻) accumulation. Another consequence is the heightened synthesis and accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) under salinity stress, causing oxidative stress, cellular damage, and ultimately cell death (Assaha et al., 2017; Isayenkov and Maathuis, 2019). Despite these challenges, plants have evolved an efficient network of ROS scavenging/detoxifying systems. This detoxification process involves nonenzymatic or enzymatic antioxidants (Pang and Wang, 2008). The ability of beneficial plant-associated bacteria from saline and arid environments to develop unique evolutionary adaptations with plants for coping with challenging conditions has gained significant attention (Etesami and Adl, 2020; Leontidou et al., 2020). For instance, Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) play crucial roles in scavenging ROS, enhancing enzymatic and nonenzymatic antioxidant activities during stress, and reducing ROS levels under abiotic stress conditions (Bharti and Barnawal, 2019; Kumar et al., 2020). Moreover, bioactive compounds produced by these beneficial microbes can stimulate crop production without the limitations faced by live microbial biofertilizers. These microbial-derived compounds are a diverse group of natural substances that contribute to the agricultural sector by enhancing resistance to biotic/abiotic stresses and acting as inter-organismal signals to improve symbioses with beneficial organisms (Naamala and Smith, 2021). Some studies highlight the positive effects of PGPR CFSs and isolated metabolites as biostimulants for enhancing plant health and growth under salinity stress (Naamala et al., 2022; Shah et al., 2022a). However, despite this evidence, considerably less attention has been directed towards utilizing PGPR-CFSs to develop eco-friendly bio-formulations for enhancing crop production under field conditions. These bioagents are designed to improve crop yield in actual fields. Despite the potential of PGPR-CFSs, using them in real-world field conditions hasn’t been explored much. This calls for more in-depth research. This effort could uncover the full potential of these biostimulants and help advance sustainable farming by connecting lab discoveries with practical use.

Clear evidence shows that climate change is happening, bringing various effects such as higher temperatures, drought and rising sea levels. The levels of these changes to date indicate a faster warming of the Earth than initially thought. It’s well-established that human activities are making this situation worse by releasing more greenhouse gases (GHGs), strengthening the greenhouse effect in the earth’s atmosphere. This disturbance in the natural balance causes the atmosphere to trap more heat, leading to significant changes in the global climate system (Ahmad et al., 2010; Corwin, 2021).

The effects of climate change, especially on crops, have become more significant in recent times. Abiotic stresses, such as water shortages, temperature extremes, waterlogging, and soil salinity, pose challenges for modern crop production. These issues disrupt the growth of crops, affecting their reproductive phases and ultimately reducing the harvest index (the proportion of grain yield to total above-ground biomass) and overall crop yield. The damage depends on factors like the crop’s development stage, when the stress occurs, and how severe it is (Onu et al., 2019; Raza et al., 2019). In real-world agriculture, multiple stressors come together, making the effects more complicated and harmful than isolated stresses. This complex stress situation highlights the challenges crops face under field conditions (Pandey et al., 2015).

At the same time, the growing human population is putting more pressure on arable land. This population increase adds to the challenges for agriculture, involving both living (biotic) and non-living (abiotic) stresses. For instance, farmers often try to boost productivity by using more chemical fertilizers, pesticides, irrigation, and machinery. Ironically, this intensified farming may increase vulnerability to various stress factors. The expected increase in disturbances caused by climate change will worsen both biotic and abiotic stresses, making it more difficult for agriculture and weakening industrialized farming systems (Xie et al., 2019). Considering these factors, there’s an urgent need to rethink agricultural strategies. A more comprehensive and integrated approach is crucial, taking into account the combined challenges of climate change and population growth.

The strategic use of natural agricultural biostimulants presents a promising solution for achieving multiple agricultural and environmental goals. By improving soil health, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and enhancing nutrient-use efficiency, biostimulants can play a crucial role in the transition towards more sustainable and resilient farming systems. These agricultural biostimulants, such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), CFSs, seaweed extracts, and bioflavonoids, have become more popular as an eco-friendly method, which can help achieve the goals of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and lowering the carbon footprint. Additionally, they improve the efficiency of nutrient use in plants. Combining and applying these natural biostimulants can enhance soil quality and further reduce GHG emissions. This approach not only supports sustainable farming but also promotes healthier crop growth. By improving soil structure and increasing microbial activity, biostimulants can enhance nutrient availability, leading to better root development and increased plant resilience against diseases and environmental stresses. Moreover, the use of these biostimulants can reduce the need for synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, which are often associated with negative environmental impacts. Natural biostimulants can also be considered a great boost for restoring degraded soils, making them more fertile and productive over time, and leading to higher crop yields and better food security, particularly in regions where soil degradation is a significant issue. In addition to their environmental benefits, natural biostimulants can also contribute to the economic sustainability of farming. By reducing the dependence on chemical inputs, farmers can lower their production costs and increase their profitability. Furthermore, the use of biostimulants can open up new markets for organic and sustainably produced crops, meeting the growing consumer demand for environmentally-friendly products (Pandey et al., 2015; Pellegrini et al., 2020; Naamala et al., 2022; Shah et al., 2022a, 2022b; Zhao et al., 2023).

Soil salinization harms plants, disrupting their processes. How plants respond to salinity stress varies based on factors such as species, genotype, growth stage, and environmental conditions. Seedling emergence, a crucial phase, is vulnerable to salinity stress across crops (Naamala et al., 2022; Yaghoubian et al., 2022). While growth stage is a key determinant of stress sensitivity, the other factors—plant species, genotype, and environmental conditions—also play significant roles in shaping plant responses to salinity. Different species and genotypes exhibit variable salinity tolerance due to inherent physiological and biochemical traits. For instance, halophytes like Suaeda fruticosa exhibit superior ion compartmentalization and osmotic adjustment compared to glycophytes such as soybean (Shah et al., 2022b). Environmental factors, such as light intensity and temperature, modulate plant metabolism and antioxidant activity under salt stress, thereby influencing the degree of damage or tolerance. In this context, understanding species-specific and genotype-dependent mechanisms, alongside environment-driven modulation, is critical for targeted stress management strategies.

Moreover, although this manuscript emphasizes salinity stress as a case study, the effects of PGPR and their CFSs extend to other abiotic stressors, such as drought, extreme temperature, and heavy metal toxicity. PGPR-derived compounds help maintain water homeostasis during drought by increasing root growth and accumulation of osmoprotectants (Ayuso-Calles et al., 2021). Under cold stress, compounds like lipo-chitooligosaccharides (LCOs) enhance seed germination and early vigor, especially in canola (Schwinghamer et al., 2015). In heat stress conditions, thuricin 17 has been shown to boost biomass and root growth (Lyu et al., 2020). In the context of biotic stress, PGPR-CFSs also act as biocontrol agents, triggering systemic resistance and suppressing pathogens such as Macrophomina phaseolina (Castaldi et al., 2021). A more holistic exploration of these applications is needed, and future studies should expand beyond salinity to harness PGPR potential across diverse environmental challenges.

Challenges in seed germination due to heightened salinity are multi-dimensional. Salinity interferes with water absorption by seeds due to elevated osmotic potential, hindering germination. Harmful sodium and chloride ions in saline conditions add another layer of hindrance. These factors reduce seed germination rates under high salinity stress (de Leija et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2022; Shah et al., 2022a), as studied by Safdar et al. (2019). As plants grow beyond the vulnerable seedling stage, they develop greater resilience to salinity stress (Shah et al., 2022b). However, the speed of seed germination and seedling establishment is crucial for determining crop yield, especially with stress factors like salinity. Signs of salt stress might not be apparent later on, yet they can result in lower crop yields. This is because the adverse effects of salinity can impact the plant’s growth from an early stage, causing reduced final yields (Sabagh et al., 2021). Moreover, seeds facing challenges due to salinity may allow weeds to grow alongside or even faster than the main crop, resulting in a significant decrease in the final harvest (Arce et al., 2009). Extended exposure to salt stress significantly impacts various physiological and biochemical aspects of plants, reducing essential characteristics like leaf area, leaf water content, and photosynthetic pigments. This hampers overall photosynthetic capacity, causing a decrease in yield. These outcomes result from a complex interplay of factors, including nutritional imbalances, osmotic stress, ion effects, oxidative stress, and impaired water uptake from the soil. The cell wall becomes a primary site of salt stress effects, leading to significant changes in its physical properties (Pang and Wang, 2008; Raza et al., 2019; Çatav et al., 2021; Corwin, 2021).

The decline in photosynthesis, a crucial process in plant metabolism, in response to salt stress, is accompanied by an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The oxidative stress-induced elevation of ROS harms plant physiology, causing the breakdown of chloroplast structure and a decrease in photosynthetic pigments (Zhao et al., 2021). In response to salinity stress, plants undergo metabolic reprogramming to maintain cellular equilibrium, involving changes in the production of primary and secondary metabolites, including proteins, responding to varying degrees of salt stress (Athar et al., 2022). The physiological shifts from salt stress exposure have far-reaching implications for plant morphological traits, affecting features like leaf area. These effects lead to a reduction in both crop yield quantity and quality. This becomes evident in the context of total leaf area reduction, a consequence of changes in cell wall regulations and integrity, leaf turgor, and photosynthetic rates. These changes negatively impact other morphological traits, including plant height, stem diameter, and root growth. Various investigations have shown the adverse negative effect of soil salinity on agronomic traits in soybean, encompassing height, stem diameter, leaf size and shape, biomass accumulation, pod count, and seed yield (Phang et al., 2008; Yu et al., 2019; Otie et al., 2021; Hasanuzzaman et al., 2022).

Over the past few decades, cultivating agriculture using environmentally sustainable farming systems has become a significant challenge in the agricultural sector. Recently, there has been considerable focus on various biological substances and microorganisms known as plant biostimulants. These agents are used in agriculture to improve plant health, growth, and nutritional vigor. Plant biostimulants include beneficial fungi and bacteria, algal extracts, inorganic compounds, protein hydrolysates, humic substances, fulvic acid, and chitosan. The global biostimulant market has been steadily growing due to the favorable and environmentally friendly nature of these products, in contrast to synthetic agrochemicals, as documented by Dong et al. (2020); Sangiorgio et al. (2020), and D’Addabbo et al. (2019). In natural ecosystems, the well-being of most cultivated and wild plants is closely connected to the microbial organisms in the soil. These microorganisms have the potential to support plant growth and development by influencing hormone production, enzyme activities, signaling pathways, and various other mechanisms. Together, these factors help plants deal with both living and non-living environmental challenges. By promoting stress tolerance and resilience in plants, these mechanisms support plant growth. Additionally, the microorganisms associated with plants also play a role in making essential nutrients available through the release of complex substances, as explained by Sahab et al. (2021). Therefore, the need to create biostimulants based on microbes to lessen the negative effects of environmental stresses and ensure global food security is a significant concern. In this context, a top priority involves understanding the detailed interactions between plant roots and soil microorganisms. Elucidating and improving these interactions are crucial, not just for making agricultural systems work better, but also for keeping the soil healthy. Sangiorgio et al. (2020) and Etesami and Adl (2020) have provided valuable insights into these processes. Despite the promising use of microbial biostimulants as a smart alternative to regular chemicals in farming, there are some limitations that need careful consideration. These include issues like lower effectiveness compared to chemical alternatives and being more sensitive to environmental factors. The fact that outcomes can vary considerably among crops and locations emphasizes the need for more research. Therefore, making microbial biostimulants work better and having consistent results require collaborative scientific efforts, as highlighted by Lyu et al. (2021) and Sangiorgio et al. (2020).

The use of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) involves various types of bacteria that can independently team up with plants in specific ways. Those found around the roots are called plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) (Sansinenea, 2019). These bacteria are good at living on and in plant roots and in the nearby soil, helping plants grow better. The ways they help can vary depending on the specific plant they’re working with. Importantly, the substances produced by these helpful bacteria not only boost plant growth by increasing nutrient availability or changing plant hormone levels but also have the potential to influence the entire plant’s genetic activity (Rai et al., 2020). Traditional agriculture has often relied on using lots of chemicals to make crops grow more, but this can cause considerable environmental harm, as indicated by Ramakrishna et al. (2019).

Alternatively, using naturally occurring plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) is an eco-friendlier approach. It not only helps plants grow better but also improves the health of the soil. This happens because these bacteria produce different substances that make important changes in the soil around the plant, like its pH, structure, and nutrient levels. So, this method has the potential to make agriculture more sustainable in the long run (Hu et al., 2018; Ramakrishna et al., 2019; Naamala and Smith, 2020). In addition, the microbiome, acting like the ‘second genome’ of plants, has a big effect on how plant genes work. It does this by releasing signal molecules that affect the host plant, making a significant impact on the plant’s health and overall condition, including responses to stress factors. So, understanding and controlling the activities of the microbiota, especially the ones that help cultivated crops, can be very useful (Turner et al., 2013; Arif et al., 2020).

It’s well-established that microbes closely linked with plant roots play a key role in boosting plant resilience to environmental stress. This helps in enhancing growth, yield, and nutrient absorption, especially when conditions are tough. This idea is supported by the research of Leontidou et al. (2020); Etesami and Adl (2020); Singh et al. (2019), and Mhatre et al. (2019). The microbial community around plant roots is known for its various contributions in diminishing the negative effects of salinity-induced stress. By regulating and adapting plant growth and development, these microbes help plants survive and thrive. So, using halo-tolerant PGPR on the intended plant species is a practical way to lessen the negative impacts of salinity-related challenges on plant growth, as explained by Leontidou et al. (2020). In simple terms, microbes that help plants grow in salty soils have various ways of doing it. They can directly improve plant growth under saline conditions, possibly by making growth-promoting hormones like auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins. They might also reduce the levels of ethylene, a substance that hinders plant growth. PGPR’s role in managing hormone levels, particularly reducing ethylene and its negative impact on plant growth in salty conditions, is a crucial part of how they work. At the same time, some helpful microbes boost bacterial auxin production or increase the plant’s own auxin levels. This helps the main root grow longer and creates more lateral roots. Balancing ethylene and auxin in this way helps plants efficiently absorb water, ions, and nutrients when dealing with saline conditions (Spaepen and Vanderleyden, 2011; Zerrouk et al., 2016; Iqbal et al., 2017; Kumar et al., 2020; Eichmann et al., 2021; Park et al., 2021).

In saline soil, plants encounter a primary challenge known as osmotic stress, which disrupts water balance and stomatal gas exchange, consequently impeding the rate of photosynthesis. Addressing this issue strategically involves facilitating osmotic adjustment through the accumulation of water-soluble molecules. Halo-tolerant Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPRs) have the capacity to contribute to this mechanism by synthesizing compatible solutes or osmoprotectants, such as proline and glycine betaine. The synthesis and accumulation of these stress protectants enable plants to navigate the deleterious impacts of salinity-induced stress on growth, as corroborated by Ahmed et al. (2021); Ayuso-Calles et al. (2021); Nawaz et al. (2020), and Kumar et al. (2020). Furthermore, the adverse effects of soil salinity extend to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in oxidative damage to vital biomolecules and even to cellular demise. Nonetheless, selectively chosen microbes exhibit the capacity to stimulate various antioxidant defense enzymes, including peroxidases, catalases, superoxide dismutases, glutathione reductases, and glutathione S-transferases. This orchestrated enhancement of antioxidant defense systems effectively counters the toxic effects of ROS in stressful environments, as underscored by Leontidou et al. (2020); Otlewska et al. (2020), and Gapińska et al. (2008).

Although the majority of studies on CFSs have been conducted under laboratory and greenhouse conditions—where CFSs have demonstrated beneficial effects on seed germination, plant growth, and stress tolerance—recent research has begun to provide evidence of their efficacy under field conditions. For example, the application of a biosurfactant-rich CFS from Bacillus subtilis significantly reduced black scurf disease incidence in potato by 50% in a field setting (Hussain and Khan, 2020). Similarly, concentrated metabolites derived from Rhizobium tropici and Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens enhanced grain yields of maize and soybean in multi-location field trials (Marks et al., 2013). Furthermore, a combinational bioformulation comprising Bradyrhizobium cells, its CFS, and exopolysaccharides led to significant improvements in pigeon pea growth and nodulation under field conditions (Tewari et al., 2020). These findings highlight the promising potential of CFS-based products in real-world agricultural systems. However, to fully realize this potential, further well-replicated and crop-specific field trials are needed to assess the consistency, scalability, and economic viability of CFS applications across diverse agroecological zones.

The utilization of beneficial microorganisms to enhance plant growth and alleviate environmental stresses has garnered significant attention in agricultural research. However, despite substantial evidence highlighting the potential of microbe-based fertilizers and growth enhancers, their practical application on commercial farms faces several limitations. These constraints lead to inconsistencies in plant responses to microbial interventions, especially in the presence of unpredictable and adverse environmental conditions in croplands. Therefore, addressing these challenges is crucial to achieving consistent and reliable outcomes when implementing live beneficial microbes in real-world field conditions, which encompass diverse soils, crops, and climatic nuances (Rilling et al., 2019; Naamala and Smith, 2020; Tewari et al., 2020). The effectiveness of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in soil inoculations can face challenges due to various factors, particularly soil properties influencing microbial colonization and the expression of their biocontrol mechanisms. Abiotic features, including soil pH, texture, moisture content, temperature, oxygen levels, and nutrient availability, intricately affect PGPR colonization and the display of their beneficial traits. Temperature plays a crucial role as it influences microbial growth rates and enzymatic activities, impacting the diversity of biostimulants produced by PGPR. Soil moisture content is another crucial determinant, shaping microbial growth dynamics and functional diversity. Changes in soil water content can hinder successful PGPR inoculation; insufficient water can limit microbial growth, while excess moisture can create anaerobic conditions, hampering PGPR activities (Clark et al., 2009; Borowik and Wyszkowska, 2016; Liu et al., 2025). Additionally, soil pH significantly influences the composition and diversity of beneficial soil microorganisms. Even slight deviations from the optimal pH range can cause shifts in microbial biostimulant composition, potentially undermining the benefits of microbial inoculants for plant production (Kaur et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2022).

Moreover, the performance of PGPR is influenced by biological constraints, with specific root-secreted compounds regulating interactions with various biotic and abiotic components of the environment. The nature and magnitude of these root-secreted compounds vary with soil properties, nutrient availability, plant age, and physiological state. These compounds act as mediators of plant-microbe associations, ultimately affecting the efficacy of microbial inoculants (Bais et al., 2006). Technical challenges also pose significant hurdles in the application of PGPR. As living formulations, these biofertilizers require precise storage conditions at appropriate temperatures and durations to maintain viability. Ensuring the survival of these microbes during production, distribution, and storage is crucial, as the shelf-life of microbial inoculants is often shorter than that of chemical fertilizers, leading to potential financial losses (Ngampimol and Kunathigan, 2008; Brar et al., 2012; Arriel-Elias et al., 2018; Basu et al., 2021).

In response to these limitations, the use of CFSs derived from beneficial bacteria has emerged as a promising approach. These extracellular bioactive compounds offer an innovative solution that addresses various challenges associated with PGPR application. Extracted from broth cultures through various techniques, these compounds can provide alternative methods for enhancing crop production and addressing the variability of environmental conditions. Importantly, CFS technologies avoid reliance on specific microbial strains, potentially yielding more consistent results, especially under varying conditions imposed by climate change (Naamala and Smith, 2020; 2021). In conclusion, the implementation of microbial inoculants and extracellular bioactive compounds involves a complex interplay of factors that determine their efficacy and viability within agricultural contexts. Overcoming the challenges posed by environmental variability, soil properties, and technical constraints requires a comprehensive understanding of these factors. Innovative approaches such as CFSs hold promise in mitigating the limitations associated with microbial interventions in modern agriculture.

While CFSs have emerged as a promising alternative to live microbial inoculants, their use is not without limitations. One key disadvantage is the short-lived nature of their effects, as CFSs lack the ability to replicate and sustain long-term interactions in the rhizosphere, unlike live PGPR which can colonize and adapt dynamically to their environment (Naamala and Smith, 2021). This can result in a limited duration of biostimulatory or biocontrol activity, necessitating repeated applications or complementary strategies such as slow-release formulations.

Furthermore, although CFSs eliminate certain challenges associated with microbial viability, their activity is still influenced by soil physicochemical properties, including pH, texture, organic matter content, moisture levels, and temperature. These factors can affect metabolite stability, diffusion rates, and interaction with root exudates, ultimately shaping their efficacy (Pellegrini et al., 2020; Castaldi et al., 2021). For instance, high soil pH or excessive clay content may bind or degrade bioactive compounds, while extreme moisture fluctuations can alter the bioavailability of applied metabolites, similarly to how they impact PGPR colonization.

Therefore, the claim that CFSs are categorically “better” than PGPR inoculants under stress-prone field conditions must be viewed contextually, rather than universally. In some environments, particularly where soil microbial competition, shelf-life concerns, or colonization failures hinder PGPR efficacy, CFSs may offer practical advantages. However, under conditions where sustained, root-associated activity is critical, traditional PGPR inoculation may remain superior. A combined or integrated approach—such as co-application of live PGPR with their CFSs or encapsulated metabolites—could provide synergistic benefits, offering both immediate and prolonged effects while buffering environmental variability. A comparative overview of PGPR and their CFSs regarding application requirements, risks, and modes of action is illustrated in Figure 2 .

However, despite the promising attributes of PGPR-derived CFSs, several challenges remain that may limit their large-scale agricultural application. For instance, bioactive metabolites within CFSs are prone to degradation in soil due to microbial activity, UV radiation, and abiotic factors, potentially reducing their efficacy (Yakhin et al., 2017; Woo and Pepe, 2018). Moreover, the composition and concentration of metabolites can vary depending on microbial strain, growth phase, and medium conditions, complicating standardization (Vurukonda et al., 2016). From a practical perspective, large-scale production and formulation of stable and cost-effective CFS-based biostimulants also remains a bottleneck (Berg et al., 2020). These limitations underscore the need for further research to optimize formulations, evaluate long-term field performance, and assess the economic viability of CFS applications.

The search for sustainable ways to boost plant growth has led to interest in organic biostimulants. These compounds provide a practical way to strengthen plant development, whether applied to seeds, young plants in the soil, or through sprays on leaves. The recent emergence of Cell-Free Supernatants from plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR-CFSs) is a new approach with the potential to offer many benefits to plants. Plants recognize and respond to these CFSs, which act as facilitators for resource acquisition, protection against pathogens, and triggers for growth mechanisms related to the specific microorganism involved (Naamala and Smith, 2020; Monjezi et al., 2023). Microbes produce compounds that, while not always necessary for direct growth, can work in a stimulus-response system. Various stimuli, both well-known and less understood, trigger the activation of hidden gene clusters in microorganisms, resulting in the creation of useful compounds. This collection includes antibiotics, pigments, growth hormones, and signaling molecules between organisms, all positively linked to the production of valuable secondary metabolites (Singh et al., 2019; Naamala and Smith, 2021). Furthermore, CFSs not only aid in plant growth and health but also help maintain populations of PGPR, including rhizobia, by promoting the growth of the host plants on which these microorganisms rely (Tewari et al., 2020).

Dealing with climate change, agricultural stress, and a growing population requires a comprehensive approach. Climate change, with its rapidly developing and human-made conditions, causes problems like water scarcity and unpredictable temperatures, affecting crops. Meanwhile, the increasing global human population puts more pressure on essential resources, making these challenges more complex. While trying to boost agricultural productivity is an important goal, intensification of standard methods may have unintended consequences and trade-offs for the environment. Considering the complex interplay of factors, it is important to have a clear strategy that addresses multiple priorities. This involves adopting coordinated approaches to tackle the adverse effects of climate change and adjusting agricultural practices to meet evolving conditions. This comprehensive strategy aims to navigate the challenges posed by climate change, ensure food security, and sustainably manage resources amid population growth. Furthermore, plants face challenges, especially from non-living factors like extreme temperatures and soil salinity, complicating modern agriculture.

The increasing prevalence of soil salinity emphasizes the urgent need to address this challenge, which often surpasses, in severity, even the most advanced predictive models. Research efforts are therefore focused on developing versatile strategies, including innovative soil improvement techniques tailored to mitigate the extensive impacts of soil salinity. The story of sustainable and regenerative farming gets better with the increasing importance of plant biostimulants. Together, substances and microorganisms work to support plant health and encourage growth, all while aligning with the goal of preserving the environment. The organized progress and careful use of microbial-based biostimulants have the potential to contribute to global food security. However, the road ahead is filled with challenges that highlight the need for dedicated research efforts and a deep understanding of the complex relationships between plants and the various soil microorganisms.

Through collaborative scientific efforts, the improvement of biostimulant effectiveness and the cultivation of positive farming approaches global food security might be able to be maintained or increased in the face of climate change. In this a complex and detailed context, the idea of using plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) emerges as a powerful approach to boost both plant growth and the inherent resilience in agricultural systems. Among these helpful bacteria, PGPR play a key role, strategically positioned in the root area to coordinate various growth-enhancing mechanisms. This includes a symphony of actions, such as adjusting nutrient accessibility and working in harmony with the subtle regulation of gene expression in plants. Unlike traditional chemical methods, using PGPR strategically has the potential to increase yields and improve soil fertility. At the same time, these microorganisms influence the nearby rhizosphere environment, signaling a significant shift in modern agricultural practices. The significant impact of the microbiome in influencing gene expression highlights the depth of the symbiotic partnership that has the potential to reshape current agricultural approaches. The vital role played by PGPR in alleviating the harmful effects of stresses showcases their diverse capabilities. This involves coordinating growth processes that result in the production of stress-reducing substances, effectively counteracting oxidative stress and providing plants with an improved survival strategy in the face of adversity. Hence, the potential of using PGPR as a sustainable agricultural strategy seems very bright, outlining a path that is set to enhance crop production while carefully maintaining the overall ecological balance.

The use of beneficial microorganisms to enhance plant growth and mitigate environmental stress presents a promising avenue for sustainable agriculture. Among these, microbial CFSs have emerged as an innovative solution, offering many of the benefits of live microbes while overcoming limitations related to survival, colonization, and environmental variability. However, the practical implementation of these microbial strategies—whether using PGPR or their derived metabolites—requires careful consideration of local soil conditions, including pH, moisture, temperature, and nutrient availability. The complex interplay between plant, microbe, and environment necessitates a deep and nuanced understanding to achieve consistent results. While laboratory and greenhouse studies have reported encouraging effects of CFSs under abiotic stresses such as salinity and drought, their real-world application remains limited. This lack of field-based validation highlights a critical gap in the literature. To bridge this divide, future efforts must prioritize optimizing CFS production, formulation, and delivery systems, alongside conducting robust, replicated field trials. Ultimately, with continued interdisciplinary research and scientific collaboration, microbial biostimulants hold immense potential to transform agriculture by enhancing crop resilience, improving soil health, and contributing meaningfully to global food security.